Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:36:03.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - VOCABULARY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Suzanne Romaine
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Vocabulary is central to both the system and the use of language. Words are what are pronounced and written and organised into sentences and other grammatical combinations, being the fundamental units of meaning. Words are also what ordinary users think of as language, for they are accessible and reflect more fully the whole culture and respond more quickly to changes in society than do other aspects of language.

The study of the English vocabulary

Vocabulary study has a long history, going back in the Western world to Plato's Cratylus. The study of English vocabulary, however, received a sharp boost with the interest of members of the Philological Society in making a New English Dictionary, eventually renamed The Oxford English Dictionary (Murray, Bradley, Craigie & Onions 1884–1933). In the middle of the nineteenth century, Dean Trench (1851, 1855), who had been instrumental in beginning the OED, was a significant contributor to the field. Caught in the Web of Words (Murray 1977) traces the history of this major dictionary, and Empire of Words (Willinsky 1994) critically analyses its strengths and weaknesses.

The most important general English dictionary of the twentieth century is Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, edited by Philip Babcock Gove (1961). Its history has been traced by Herbert C. Morton (1994). The most important new specialised dictionary of the century is the Dictionary of American English (Cassidy and Hall 1985–). The history of English language lexicography before the period covered by this volume has been treated by Starnes and Noyes (1946), and that of American lexicography during the post-1775 period by Algeo (1990).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, V. (1973). An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J. (1987). Words in the Mind: an Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Algeo, J. & Algeo, A. S. (eds.) (1991). Fifty Years ‘Among the New Words’: A Dictionary of Neologisms, 19411991. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Algeo, J. (1971). The voguish uses of non . American Speech 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, J. (1975). The acronym and its congeners. First LACUS Forum 1974, ed. Makkai, Adam and Makkai, Valerie Becker . Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.Google Scholar
Algeo, J. (1977). Blends, a structural and systemic view. American Speech 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, J. (1978). The taxonomy of word making. Word 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, J. (1980). Where do all the new words come from?American Speech 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, J. (1990). American Lexicography. In Wörterbücher Dictionaries Dictionnaires: International Encyclopedia of Lexicography, ed. Hausmann, F. J. , Reichmann, O. , Wiegand, H. E. & Zgusta, L. , 19872009. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Among the new words. (1941–). ed. Bolinger, D. L. , Russell, I. W. , Porter, M. G. , Algeo, J. , Algeo, A. S. & Glowka, W. . American Speech 16–.CrossRef
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ayto, J. (1989–90). The Longman Register of New Words. 2 vols. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. W. (ed.) (1978). Early Modern English: Additions and Antedatings to the Record of English Vocabulary, 1475–1700. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Barber, C. (1964). Linguistic Change in Present-Day English. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Barnhart, C. L. , Steinmetz, S. & Barnhart, R. K. (1973). The Barnhart Dictionary of New English since 1963. Bronxville, NY: Barnhart.Google Scholar
Barnhart, C. L. , Steinmetz, S. & Barnhart, R. K. (1980). The Second Barnhart Dictionary of New English. Bronxville, NY: Barnhart.Google Scholar
Barnhart, D. K. (1987). The Barnhart Dictionary Companion Index (1982–1985). Cold Spring, NY: Lexik House.Google Scholar
Barnhart, D. K. (1994). The Barnhart New-Words Concordance. Cold Spring, NY: Lexik House.Google Scholar
Barnhart, R. K. & Steinmetz, S. , with Barnhart, C. L. (1990). The Third Barnhart Dictionary of New English. New York: H. W. Wilson.Google Scholar
Barnhart, C. L. & Barnhart, D. K. (eds.) (1982–). The Barnhart Dictionary Companion: A Quarterly to Update General Dictionaries. Cold Spring, NY: Lexik House.Google Scholar
Barnhart, C. L. & Barnhart, R. K. (eds.) (1988). World Book Dictionary. Chicago: World Book.Google Scholar
Barnhart, R. K. & Steinmetz, S. (eds.) (1988). The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology. Bronx, NY: H. W. Wilson.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1983). English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, P. (ed.) (1984). A Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English. By Partridge, Eric . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Beard, R. (1976). Once more on the analysis of ed-adjectives. Journal of Linguistics 12.Google Scholar
Biese, Y. M. (1941). Origin and Development of Conversions in English. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, ser. B, vol. 45, no. 2. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Boase-Beier, J. (1987). Poetic Compounds: The Principles of Poetic Language in Modern English Poetry. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1937–40). The living language. Words: A Periodical Devoted to the Study of the Origin, History, and Etymology of English Words 36. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Words and meanings, New. 1944–76. ed. Bolinger, D. L. , Russell, I. W. , Chapman, R. L. , Potter, S. & the , G. and Merriam, C. . Britannica Book of the Year. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.Google Scholar
Brown, R. W. (1956). Composition of Scientific Words. Rev. edn. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. (1972–86). A Supplement to the Oxford English Dictionary. 4 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Butler, S. (ed.) (1990). The Macquarie Dictionary of New Words. Macquarie University: Macquarie Library.Google Scholar
Cannon, G. (1987). Historical Change and English Word-Formation. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cartsensen, B. (1968). Zur Systematik und Terminologie Deutsch-Englischer Lehnbeziehungen. In Wortbildung, Syntax, und Morphologie: Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Hans Marchand, ed. Brekle, H. E. & Iipka, L. , 3245. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cassidy, E. G. & Hall, J. (eds.) (1985–) Dictionary of American Regional English. Vols. 1–. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Chapin, P. G. (1967). On the Syntax of Word-Derivation in English. Bedford, MA: Mitre Corp.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. L. (1986). New Dictionary of American Slang. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derolez, R. (1972). Two new dictionaries [Finkenstaedt, Leisi, Wolff 1970; Lehnert 1971]. English Studies 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellegård, A. (1963). English, Latin, and Morphemic Analysis. Gothenburg Studies in English 15. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, T. & Wolff, D. (1973). Ordered Profusion: Studies in Dictionaries and the English Lexicon. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, T. , Leisi, E. & Wolff, D. (1970). A Chronological English Dictionary Listing 80,000 Words in Order of Their Earliest Known Occurrence. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Flexner, S. B. (ed.) (1987). The Random House Dictionary of the English Language. 2nd edn., unabridged. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foster, B. (1968). The Changing English Language. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, E. W. (ed.) (1989). Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Gove, P. B. (ed.) (1961). Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry 4.Google Scholar
Hatcher, A. G. (1951). Modern English Word-Formation and Neo-Latin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. E. (ed.) (1984). Common Indian Words in English. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirtle, W. H. (1969). -Ed adjectives like ‘Verandahed’ and ‘blue-eyed’. Journal of Linguistics 6.Google Scholar
Hofland, K. & Johansson, S. (1982). Word Frequencies in British and American English. Bergan: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1975). Problems in the analysis of ed-adjectives. Journal of Linguistics 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1942). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, vol. 6, Morphology. London: Allen & Unwin, reprinted 1961.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. & Hofland, K. (1989). Frequency Analysis of English Vocabulary and Grammar. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. (1978). Some Aspects of the Vocabulary of Learned and Scientific English. Gothenburg Studies in English 42. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Klein, E. (1966–7). A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier, one-volume reprint 1971.Google Scholar
Koziol, H. (1972). Handbuch der englischen Wortbildungslehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kruisinga, E. (1932). A Handbook of Present-Day English. Part II, English Accidence and Syntax3. 5th edn. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Kurath, H. & Kuhn, S. M. (eds.) (1954–). Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kurian, G. T. (1993). Timenglish: The Words of Time. Baldwin Place, NY: Word Almanac.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. (1960). The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Reprint, The Hague: Mouton, 1968.Google Scholar
Lehnert, M. (1971). Rückläufiges Wörterbuch der englischen Gegenwartssprache. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Leith, D. (1983). A Social History of English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lerner, S. & Belkin, G. S. . (1993). Trash Cash, Fizzbos, and Flatliners: A Dictionary of Today's Words. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Reprinted as A Dictionary of New Words (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1995).Google Scholar
Levi, J. N. (1978). The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (1981). On the Organization of the Lexicon. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lighter, J. E. (1994–). Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang. Vols. 1–. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lindelöf, U. (1938). English Verb-Adverb Groups Converted into Nouns. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum, vol. 9, no. 5. Helsingfors: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Ljung, M. (1970). English Denominal Adjectives: A Generative Study of the Semantics of a Group of High-Frequency Denominal Adjectives in English. Gothenburg Studies in English 21. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Ljung, M. (1974). A Frequency Dictionary of English Morphemes. Stockholm: AWE/Gebers.Google Scholar
Ljung, M. (1976). -Ed adjectives revisited. Journal of Linguistics 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1993). Etymology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. 2nd edn. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1974). Morphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word-Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. B. (1980). Infixing and interposing in English. American Speech 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meus, V. (1975). Review of Ordered Profusion , by Finkenstaedt, T. and Wolff, D. . English Studies 56.Google Scholar
Meys, W. J. (1975). Compound Adjectives in English and the Ideal Speaker-Listener. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Mish, F. C. (1976). 6,000 Words: A Supplement to Webster's Third New International Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Mish, F. C. (1983). 9,000 Words: A Supplement to Webster's Third New International Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Mish, F. C. (1986). 12,000 Words: A Supplement to Webster's Third New International Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Morris, W. (ed.) (1969). American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. New York: American Heritage.Google Scholar
Mort, S. (1986). Longman Guardian New Words. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Morton, H. C. (1994). The Story of ‘Webster's Third’: Philip Gove's Controversial Dictionary and Its Critics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, E. (1977). Caught in the Web of Words: James Murray and the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, J. A. H. , Bradley, H. , Craigie, W. A. & Onions, C. T. . 18841933. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd edn., prepared by Simpson, J. A and Weiner, E. S. C. . 20 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.Google Scholar
Neufeldt, V. (ed.) (1988). Webster's New World Dictionary of American English. 3rd college edn. New York: Webster's New World.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, H. J. (1971). Towards a diachronic analysis of vocabulary. Cahiers de lexicologies. 18.Google Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (1987). Semantic aspects of comparative noun-adjective compounds. In Neuere Forschungen zur Wortbildung und Historiographie der Linguistik: Festgabefür Herbert E. Brekle zum 50. Geburtstag, 14554. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Onions, C. T. (1966). The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pennanen, E. V. (1966). Contributions to the Study of Back-Formation in English. Acta Academiae Socialis, ser. A, vol. 4. Tampere: Julkaisija Yhteiskunnallinen Korkeakoulu.Google Scholar
Pennanen, E. V. (1971). On the Introduction of French Loan-Words into English. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, ser. A., vol. 38. Tampere: Tampereen Yliopsisto.Google Scholar
Pennanen, E. V. (1972). Current views of word-formation. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73.Google Scholar
Pennanen, E. V. (1982). Remarks on syntagma and word-formation. Folia Linguistica 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. A. (1987). Deutsches Sprachgut im Wortschatz der Amerikaner und Engländer. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pound, L. (1914). Blends: Their Relation to English Word Formation. Anglistische Forschungen 42. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Praninskas, J. (1968). Trade Name Creation: Processes and Patterns. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rao, G. S. (1954). Indian Words in English. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ruhl, C. (1989). On Monosemy:A Study in Linguistic Semantics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, J. (1980). Documentation in the ‘O.E.D.’: Shakespeare and Nash as Test Cases. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, M. S. (1935). A History of Foreign Words in English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Seymour, R. K. (1968). A Bibliography of Word Formation in the Germanic Languages. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. & Weiner, E. (1993). Oxford English Dictionary Additions Series. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. (1988). The new vocabulary of English. In Words for Robert Burchfields Sixty-Fifth Birthday, ed. Stanley, E. G. & Hoad, T. F. , 14352. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Soukhanov, A. H. (1995). Word Watch: The Stories behind the Words of Our Lives. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Starnes, D. T. & Noyes, G. E. (1946). The English Dictionary from Cawdrey to Johnson, 1604–1755. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Stein, G. (1973). English Word-Formation over Two Centuries. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Stein, G. (1977). The place of word-formation in linguistic description. In Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung, ed. Brekle, Herbert E. and Kastovsky, Dieter , 21935. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Stein, G. (1984). Champers, preggers, starkers: -ers in present-day English. In Navicula Tubingensis: Studia in Honorem Antonii Tovar, ed. Arizcuren, F. J. Oroz , 35357. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. (ed.) (1996). Words: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Lund, 25–26 August 1995, organized under the auspices of the Royal Academy of Letters, History and Antiquities. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien.Google Scholar
Thorén, B. (1959). 8000 ord för 8 års engelska. Malmö: Gleerups.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. & Lorge, I. (1944). The Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 Words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 3rd printing 1959.Google Scholar
Thun, N. (1963). Reduplicative Words in English: A Study of Formations of the Types ‘Tick-tick’, ‘Hurly-burly’, and ‘Shilly-shally. Lund: Carl Bloms.Google Scholar
Trench, R. C. (1851). On the Study of Words. 2nd edn. New York: Redfield, 1852.Google Scholar
Trench, R. C. (1855). English, Past and Present. 9 th edn. London: Macmillan, 1875.Google Scholar
Wall, C. E. & Przebienda, E. (eds.) (1969–70). Words and Phrases Index. 4 vols. Ann Arbor, MI: Pierian.Google Scholar
Warren, B. (1978). Semantic Patterns of Noun-Noun Compounds. Gothenburg Studies in English 41. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willinsky, J. (1994). Empire of Words: The Reign of the OED. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandvoort, R. W. (1969). A Handbook of English Grammar. 5th edn. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • VOCABULARY
  • Edited by Suzanne Romaine, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • VOCABULARY
  • Edited by Suzanne Romaine, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • VOCABULARY
  • Edited by Suzanne Romaine, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.003
Available formats
×