Bibliographies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of the English Language , pp. 669 - 728Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000
References
Anon. (1680). A Treatise of Stops, Points or Pauses.London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 65, 1968]
Anon. (1682). Friendly advice to the correctour of the English Press at Oxford concerning the English Orthographie.London: Clavell.
Anon. (1704a). The Expert Orthographist. [London.]
Anon. (1704b). Right Spelling very much Improved.London: (?) the Author.
Anon. (1711). A Needful Attempt, to Make Language and Divinity Plain and Easie.London: Morphew; Cambridge: Smith. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 154, 1969]
(German original 1978, 2nd edn 1994.)
(1664). The Arrainment of Christendom. [?Rotterdam.] [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 293, 1971]Google Scholar
(1799). The Pronunciation of the English Language. Edinburgh: for the author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 72, 1968]Google Scholar
(1989). With double tongue: diglossia, stylistics and the teaching of English. In (ed.). Reading, Analysing and Teaching Literature,London: Longman ,204–40.Google Scholar
(1994). From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: stylisation and (de-) subjectivisation as processes of language change. Transactions of the Philological Society 92 (1): 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (eds.). (1990). Papers from the Fifth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spectator. See Spectator.
(1985). Metaformations: Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1982). Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1936/1937). I go a-fishing: an historical and geographical sketch of the a-phrase in its active significance. Studia Neophilologica 9: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986). Reconsidering the history of Like. Journal of Linguistics 22: 375–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962). Toward an Augustan Poetic: Edmund Waller's “Reform” of English Poetry.Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
(1965ff.). A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
(1966). Bibliography and historical linguistics. The Library. 5th series 21: 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. A corrected reprint of volumes I–x. Ilkley: Janus Press.Google Scholar
(1982). The Genitive v. the of Construction: a Study of Syntactic Variation in Seventeenth-Century English.Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
(1984). Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38: 20–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976). A Descriptive Syntax of Christopher Marlowe's Language.Tokyo: University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
(1949). The Language of Natural Description in Eighteenth Century Poetry.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Toxophilus=Ascham, R. (1545 [1868]). Toxophilus. Arber's English Reprints 7. London: A. Murray & Son.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1996). The Sublime: a Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). Well-weighed Syllables: Elizabethan Verse in Classical Metres.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1965). Literary Language and its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages (trans. ). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1984). Double negation and the eighteenth century. In . & (eds.). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development.Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield ,138–48.Google Scholar
(1985). Relative which in late eighteenth-century usage: the Clift family correspondence. In et al. (1985) ,15–29.Google Scholar
(1984). More on the history of subject contact clauses in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 5: 171–84.Google Scholar
(1883). English Dialect Words of the Eighteenth Century as Shown in the Universal Etymological Dictionary of Nathaniel Bailey. E.D.S., Series B. Reprinted Glossaries.Google Scholar
(1979). Ne in Middle English and Early Modern English. English Studies 60: 673–9. (1982). A functional perspective of the system of negation in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 3: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (1975). Michigan Early Modern English Materials. Ann Arbor, MI: Xerox University Microfilms & The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1978). Early Modern English: Additions and Antedatings to the Record of English Vocabulary 1475–1700. Hildesheim & New York: Olms.Google Scholar
(1770). Reflections on the English Language. London: for J. Bell [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 87, 1968]Google Scholar
(1926). ‘The anglicization of Scottish printing’. Scottish Historical Review 23: 107–15.Google Scholar
(1984). Form and functions of ONE: diachronic aspects. In & (eds.). Medieval Studies Conference in Aachen 1983. Language and Literature.Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang ,143–55.Google Scholar
(1944). William Shakspere's Small Latine and Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
(1947). Verb forms in -s and -th in Early Modern English. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 46: 183–7.Google Scholar
(1981). ‘You’ and ‘Thou’ in Shakespeare's Richard III. Leeds Studies in English, ns 12: 273–89. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987).Google Scholar
(1809). An Orthoepical Analysis of the English Language. London: Didier & Tebett. ed. 1974, A Critical Facsimile Edition of Thomas Batchelor: ‘an Orthoepical Analysis of the English Language’ and An Orthoepical Analysis of the Dialect of Bedfordshire, (1809. Lund Studies in English, 45.Google Scholar
(1964). Dryden's revisions in the Essay of Dramatic Poesy: the preposition at the end of the sentence and the expression of the relative. Review of English Studies ns 15: 268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965). Who and which and the grammarians of the seventeenth century. English Studies 46: 145–50.Google Scholar
(1967). ‘Ray, Worlidge, and Kersey's revision of The New World of English Words’. Anglia 85: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1964). Dryden's revisions in the Essay of Dramatic Poesy: the preposition at the end of the sentence and the expression of the relative. Review of English Studies 15 (59): 268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Vocabulary change in English. (Review of Cannon 1987.) American Speech 64: 252–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971). Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition, 1350–1450.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Redeeming Eve: Women Writers of the English Renaissance.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1580). Le maistre d'escole anglois, contenant plusieurs profitables preceptes pour les naturelz francois, et autres estrangers qui ont la langue francoise pour paruenir a la vraye prononciation de la language angloise. London: Thomas Purfotoote.Google Scholar
(1986). A Bibliography of Stylistics and Related Criticism, 1967–83.New York: Modern Languages Association of America.Google Scholar
(1980). English passives: a study in syntactic change and relational grammar. Lingua 51: 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1914). Die periphrastische Form des englischen Verbums im 17. Jahrhundert.Halle/Saale: Kaemmerer.Google Scholar
Froissart=Bourchier, J. (Lord Berners). (1523–1525 [1901–1903]). The Chronicle of Froissart (1523–1525). (ed.). (1901–1903). Tudor Translations.Google Scholar
& (1972). The interaction of speech perception and grammatical structure in the evolution of language. In & (eds.). Linguistic Change and Generative Theory.Essays from the University of California, Los Angeles, conference on Historical Linguistics in the Perspective of Transformational Theory, February 1969. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press ,32–95.Google Scholar
& (1992). The linguistic evolution of five written and speech- based English genres from the seventeenth to the 20th centuries. In et al. (1992) ,688–704.Google Scholar
(1941). Origin and Development of Conversions in English (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae B 45). Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
(1990). Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England.Leeds: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
(1926). Studies in the Grammar of the Early Printed English Bible Versions.Lund: Gleerupska Univ.-bokhandeln.Google Scholar
[1783]. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. 8th American edn. New York: Collins & Co, 1819. Facsimile edn, with introduction by , Delmar, New York: Scholars Facsimiles and Reprints, 1993.Google Scholar
(1965). English versions of ‘Reynard the Fox’ in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Studies in Philology 62 ,63–77.Google Scholar
(1976). The text and its presentation. In his Caxton: England's First Publisher. London: Osprey, ch. 6.Google Scholar
(1981). Non-standard Language in English Literature. (The Language Library). London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1984). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development.Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
(1979). Spoken English in Ireland. Representative Texts Assembled and Analysed. Dublin: Dolmen Press.Google Scholar
(1963). A grammatical approach to personification allegory. Modern Philology 60: 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1656). Glossographia.London: Newcomb. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 153, 1969]Google Scholar
(1931). Studien zum präpositionalen Infinitiv und Akkusativ mit dem TO-Infinitiv. Anglia 55: 114–247.Google Scholar
(1911). Critical Contributions to Early English Syntax. 2nd series. Christiania: Videnskabsselskabet i Christiania.Google Scholar
(1954). The Classical Heritage and its Beneficiaries.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1717 [1754]). The Works of the Right Honourable Henry St John, Lord Viscount Bolingbroke. (ed.). (1754). London.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1966). The English Language. Essays by English and American Men of Letters, I, 1490–1839. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1966). The English Language: Essays by English and American Men of Letters 1490–1839.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Silence and Sound: Theories of Poetics from the Eighteenth Century.London & Toronto: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
(1937). The Genitive and its of-Equivalent in the latter half of the Eighteenth Century.Amsterdam: H.J. Paris.Google Scholar
(1994). On the progression of the progressive in early Modern English. ICAME Journal 18: 5–25.Google Scholar
(1983). Existential There: a Synchronic and Diachronic Study. Studia Anglistica Norvegica 2. University of Bergen.Google Scholar
(1980). Orthoepists, printers and the rationalisation of English spelling. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 79: 332–54.
(1981). Dialectology in seventeenth-century dictionaries. Papers of the Dictionary Society of North America ,1–8.Google Scholar
& . (1711). A Grammar of the English Tongue.London: Brightland. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1967.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1921). The English Rite, Beinga Synopsis of the Sources and Revisions of‘The Book of Common Prayer’: 2 vols. 2nd rev. edn. London: Rivingtons.Google Scholar
(1988). The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post-verbal Particles. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1996). Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1654). Two Books more Exact and Judicious for the Entring Children to Spell.London: the Author.Google Scholar
, & (eds.). (1974). Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, 18 April, 1974. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
(1960–1962). Die englische Sprache: ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung, I–II. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(1580). Booke at Large for the Amendement of Orthography for English Speech. London: H. Denham; reprinted Leeds University (1970).Google Scholar
(1586 [1980]). The Works of William Bullokar II Pamphlet for Grammar 1586. (ed.). The University of Leeds, School of English.Google Scholar
(1966 [1580a]). A Short Introduction or Guiding. (Leeds Texts and Monographs, ns1). & (eds.). The Works of William Bullokar I.Leeds: the University.Google Scholar
(1970 [1580b]). Booke at Large. (Leeds Texts and Monographs ns1). (ed.) The Works of William Bullokar III. Leeds: the University.Google Scholar
(1666, 1678). Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners and The Pilgrim's Progress from this World to that which is to come. (ed.). (1966). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). The bare infinitive in The Winter's Tale. In & (eds.). Shakespeare, Text, Language, Criticism: Essays in Honour of Marvin Spevack.Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann ,34–56.Google Scholar
(1990). A profile of the grammar of three sixteenth-century lives of Sir Thomas More and of an unrelated ‘drab’ prose work by Anthony Gilby. In & (eds.). England and the Continental Renaissance: Essays in Honour of J. B. Trapp.Woodbridge: The Boydell Press ,109–24.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1994). The Cambridge History of the English Language. V: English in Britain and Overseas. Origins and Development. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1759). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. 2nd edn. London: R. & J. Dodsley. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1970.Google Scholar
(1992). Lexis and semantics. In (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Language, II. Cambridge University Press ,409–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1702). The Art of English Poetry. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 75, 1968]Google Scholar
(1702). The Art of English Poetry.London: Knaplock, Castle & Tooke. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.Google Scholar
(1991). The English Alliterative Tradition.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972). Compositors E & F of the Shakespeare First Folio. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 66: 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1968 [1574]). De pronunciatione graecae et latinae linguae. (ed. & tr.) (Leeds Texts and Monographs, ns2). Leeds: the University.Google Scholar
(1987). Historical Change and English Word-Formation; Recent Vocabulary (American University Studies, Ser. IV, English Language and Literature 46). New York & Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
(1985). Popular literature. In (ed.). Popular Culture in Seventeenth-Century England.London: Croom Helm ,198–243.Google Scholar
(1687). The Tutor to True English.London: Larkin. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 287, 1971]Google Scholar
(1576). Galateo, or Rather, A Treatise of the Manners and Behaviours, it Behoveth a Man to Use and Eschewe, in his Familiar Conversation. Trans. . London: R. Newbery [EE 120,1969].Google Scholar
(1974). Natural sound changes: some questions of directionality in diachronic phonetics. In et al (1974) ,21–9.Google Scholar
(1604). A Table Alphabeticall, Conteyning and Teaching the True Writing, and Vnderstanding of Hard Vsuall English Wordes.London: Weauer.Google Scholar
= The Letters of John Chamberlain. (ed.). (1939). The American Philosophical Society: Memoirs 12: 1. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
(1939). The Letters of John Chamberlain (Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society 12: 1). (ed.). Philadelphia: The Lancaster Press.Google Scholar
(1843 [1549]). Letter to Peter Osborne. In (ed.). Original Letters of Eminent Literary Men.London: Camden Society.Google Scholar
(1972). The time dimension: contribution toward a theory of sound change. Foundations of Language 8: 457–98.Google Scholar
(1970). Reading, writing, and phonology. Harvard Educational Review 40: 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1939). The Articles: a Study of their Theory and Use in English.Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
(1948). John Milton at St Paul's School: A Study of Ancient Rhetoric in English Renaissance Education.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1587). The Petie Schole. London: Vautrollier. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 2, 1967]Google Scholar
(1623). The English Dictionarie.London: Butter. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 124, 1968]Google Scholar
(1977). Sensible Words: Linguistic Practice in England 1640–1785. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1964). The Art of Discrimination, Thomson's ‘The Seasons' and the Language of Criticism.Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1674). The Compleat English Schoolmaster.London: Parker. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 26, 1967]Google Scholar
(1676). English Dictionary. London: S. Crouch. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 268, 1971]Google Scholar
(1966). Paradoxia Epidemica: the Renaissance Tradition of Paradox.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1972). ‘Language 1660–1784’. In (ed.). The Pelican Guide to English Literature 4: From Dryden to Johnson. Harmondsworth: Penguin ,125–41.Google Scholar
(1995). The chronology of French and Latin loan words in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 93 (2): 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way of the World=W. Congreve (1700). The Complete Plays of William Congreve. (ed.). (1967). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1687). The English Teacher. London: the author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 175, 1969]Google Scholar
(1687). The English Teacher. London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 175, 1969]. (ed.). (1953). Christopher Cooper's English Teacher (1687). Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
(1788). Elements of the Grammar of the English Language. London: Printed for the author.Google Scholar
(1596). The English Schoole-Maister. London: Jackson & Dexter. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 98, 1968]Google Scholar
(1611). A Dictionarie of the French and English Tongues. London: A. Islip. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 82, 1968]Google Scholar
(1937). ‘Northern words in Modern English’. S. P. E. Tract 50. Oxford: Clarendon Press ,79–107.Google Scholar
(1946). ‘The critique of pure English from Caxton to Smollett’. S. P. E. Tract 65. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
(1989). Seventeenth-century punctuation theory: Butler's philosophical analysis and Wilkins' philosophical critique. Folia Linguistica Historica 8: 309–49.Google Scholar
(1939 [1544]). (ed.). Cranmer's First Litany 1544.London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge; New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1983–1984). Editorial problems in Milton. Review of English Studies ns 34: 279–303. ns 35: 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (1928). The Prologues and Epilogues of William Caxton. (Early English Text Society 176.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
& . (1996). The borrowing of Classical and Romantic words into English: a study based on the electronicOxford English Dictionary. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 1(2): 95–124.Google Scholar
(1912). A history of the English relative constructions. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 11: 10–29, 180–204, 355–80.Google Scholar
(1970). Shakespeare and the tune of the time. Shakespeare Survey 23:1–12. Reprinted in & (1987).Google Scholar
(1951). Linguistic Studies in some Elizabethan Writings I: an Inquiry into Aspects of the Language of Thomas Deloney.Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
(1956). Linguistic Studies in some Elizabethan Writings II: The Auxiliary ‘do'.Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
(1640). Orthoepia anglicana.London: The Company of Stationers. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 31, 1967]Google Scholar
(1992). The status of word-formation in Middle English: approaching the question. In et al. (1992) ,465–82.Google Scholar
& (1994). The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In (1994) ,59–77.Google Scholar
(1948). Studies on the Accentuation of Polysyllabic Greek, Latin and Romance words in English. Stockholm Studies in English.Google Scholar
(1963). John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation. Part II: Phonology. Stockholm Studies in English, 11. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1955). John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1955). John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation. Part I: Biographical and Bibliographical Introductions. Texts and Index Verborum. Stockholm Studies in English, 5. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1983). Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
(1963). The Language of Science and the Language of Literature 1700–1740.London & New York: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
(1959). Scribal variation in late fifteenth-century English. In Mélanges de linguistique et de philologie: Fernand Mossé in memoriam. Paris: Didier ,95–103.Google Scholar
(1599). The English Secretary or Methods of Writing Epistles and Letters with a Declaration of such Tropes, Figures and Schemes, as either usually or for ornament sake are therin required.London: printed by P.S. for C. Burbie. Facsimile reprint with an introduction by , (Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints) Gainesville, Florida, 1967.Google Scholar
Robinson Crusoe = Defoe, D. (1719). The Life and Strange Surprising Adventures of Robinson Crusoe. London: W. Taylor.
Roxana = (1724). Roxana, the Fortunate Mistress. (ed.). (1964). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
& (1989). The demise of the Old English heritage and lexical innovation in Middle English: two intertwined developments. Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 15: 1–20.Google Scholar
(1984). Relativizers in Early Modern English: a dynamic quantitative study. In (1984) ,61–87.Google Scholar
(1986). English contact clauses revisited: a diachronic approach. Folia Linguistica Historica 7: 107–20.Google Scholar
(1988). Socio-historical aspects of relativization in late sixteenth century English: c. 1550–1600. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 21: 25–39.Google Scholar
Gull's Hornbook = . (1609 [1969]). The Gull's Hornbook. (ed.). (1969). Menston: Scolar PressGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker's Holiday= (1600). The Shoemaker's Holiday in The Dramatic Works of Thomas Dekker. (ed.). (1962). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1985a). Why Old English had no prepositional passive. English Studies 66: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985b). The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered. In et al. (1985) ,45–60.Google Scholar
(1985c). Some observations on ‘being teaching’. Studia Neophilologica 57/2 ,157–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Standardizing Written English. Diffusion in the Case of Scotland 1520–1659. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1985). Untersuchungen zur phonologischen Rezeption romanischen Lehnguts im Mittel- und Frühneuenglischen (Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 268). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
(1976). Language Processing and the Reading of Literature.Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(1751 [1740]). A New Guide to the English Tongue.London: Kent. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 4, 1967]Google Scholar
(1983). The Language of Medicine; its Evolution, Structure, and Dynamics. 2nd edn. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
(1969 [1955]). “Early Modern Standard English”. In (ed.). Approaches to English Historical Linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
& . (1982). Dictionary of Literary-Rhetorical Conventions of the English Renaissance.Westport & London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
(a1631). The Sermons of John Donne & (eds.). (1953–1962). Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1986). Defoe's Shortest Way with Dissenters: irony, intention and reader-response. Prose Studies 9 (2): 120–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1903). The loss of the prefix ge- in the modern English verb and some of its consequences, II: the conjunction since. Englische Studien 32: 371–428.Google Scholar
& (1991). The Germanic foot: metrical coherence in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 251–86.Google Scholar
Plays= (1669–1694). The Dramatic Works. 6 vols. (ed.). (1968). New York: Gordian Press.Google Scholar
Poems = (1649–1700). The Poems of John Dryden. 4 vols. (ed.). (1958). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1988). On Language. Rhetorica, Phonologica, Syntactica: a Festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his Friends and Colleagues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1710). A Guide to the English Tongue. London: Butler. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 92, 1968]Google Scholar
(1723). A Dictionary of all the Words Commonly Us'd in the English Tongue.London: S. & T. Butler.Google Scholar
, , & (eds.). (1985). Papers from the fourth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1910). Die Dialekt- und Ausländertypen des älteren englischen Dramas. Teil I: Die Dialekttypen. Louvain: A. Uystpruyst.Google Scholar
(1916). Geschichte der englischen Sprache, II: Historische Syntax. 3rd edn. Strasbourg: Trübner.Google Scholar
(1953). The Auxiliary ‘do’: the Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1983). Substantivsätze mit oder ohne that in der neueren englischen Literatur. Anglia 57: 78–109.Google Scholar
= (1824–1846). Original Letters Illustrative of English History; including numerous Royal Letters I–III. London: Richard BentleyGoogle Scholar
(1869). On Early English Pronunciation, with Especial Reference to Shakspere and Chaucer. Part I. On the Pronunciation of the XIVth, XVIth, XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries. London: Asher.Google Scholar
(1874). On Early English Pronunciation, with Especial Reference to Shakespere and Chaucer. Part III. On the Pronunciation of the XIVth and XVIth centuries. Chaucer, Gower, Wycliffe, Spenser, Shakespere, Salesbury, Barcley, Hart, Bullokar, Gill. Pronouncing Dictionary. London: Asher.Google Scholar
(1981). Diachronic Grammar: the Histor y of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions.Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). The English present perfect: has it seen its best days? In , & (eds.). Essays on English Language.Oslo: Novus ,95–106.Google Scholar
[Scolar Press] = (1531 [1970]). The Boke Named The Governor, 1531. Menston: The Scolar Press.Google Scholar
(1531). The Boke Named the Gouernour. London: T. Berthelet. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 246, 1970]Google Scholar
(1938). On the Origin and Early Development of the Auxiliary ‘do'.Lund: G. V. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
(1980). On the history of subject contact clauses in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 1: 139–70.Google Scholar
(1990). Finite complement clauses in Shakespeare's English I–II. Studia Neophilologica 62: 3–21; 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). On the origin and history of the English syntactic type (and) none but he to marry with Nan Page. English Studies 72: 513–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Infinitive complements in Shakespeare's English.Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago.Google Scholar
(1916). Colloquial contractions in Beaumont, Fletcher, Massinger and Shakespeare as a test of authorship. PMLA 31: 326–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A Constant Couple = (1701). In (ed.). (1967). The Complete Works of George Farquhar 1. New York: Gordian.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1994). Studies in Scots and Gaelic. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Languages of Scotland. Edinburgh: Canongate Academic.Google Scholar
, & (1994). English Historical Linguistics 1992.Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tom Jones = (1749). The History of Tom Jones. (ed.). (1984). London: Penguin English Library.Google Scholar
& (1973). Ordered Profusion: Studies in Dictionaries and the English Lexicon (Annales Universitatis Saraviensis 13). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
& (1981). Optional vs. radical re-analysis: mechanisms of syntactic change. Lingua 55: 301–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983). The demise of the Old English impersonal construction. Journal of Linguistics 19: 337–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987). A ‘Case’ for the Old English impersonal. In , , & (eds.). Explanation and Linguistic Change.Amsterdam: John Benjamins ,79–120.Google Scholar
(1988). The rise of the for noun phrase to V construction: an explanation. In & (eds.). An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang.London and New York: Routledge ,67–88.Google Scholar
(1977). Chancery and the emergence of standard written English in the fifteenth century. Speculum 52: 870–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979). Chancery standard and modern written English. Journal of the Society of Archivists 6: 136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980). Was there a kl-, gl- > tl-, dl- change in Early Modern EnglishLingua Posnaniensia 23: 87–90.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1985). Historical Semantics and Historical Word-Formation (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 29). Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Stanhope, Philip, 4th Earl of Chesterfield] (1754). The World, no. 101 (5 December). London: Cooper.Google Scholar
(1534 [1523]). The Book of Husbandry. (ed.). (1882). London: Trübner & Co. for the English Dialect Society.Google Scholar
(1740). Prononciation de la langue Angloise. Paris. In (1944). Mather Flint on early Eighteenth-Century English Pronunciation. Skrifta Utgivna af Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskapsamfundet i Uppsala, 37.Google Scholar
& (1901). Dialekt-materialien aus dem 18. Jahrhundert – III. Dialektwörter bei Kersey (1708). Anglia 24: N.F. 12, 118–32.Google Scholar
(1975). Conceitful Thought: the Interpretation of English Renaissance Poems.Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(1986). Reinterpreting English humanism. In & (eds.). Reassessing the Henrician Age: Humanism, Politics and Reform 1500–1550.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1993). Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (1673). Instructions for Right Spelling. [London]. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 303, 1971]Google Scholar
(1985). The rise of do-support in early Modern English: a reappraisal. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 10: 1–29.Google Scholar
(1588). The Arcadian Rhetorike. London: Thomas Orwin [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 176, 1969]Google Scholar
(1948). Studies on the Tenses of the English Verb from Chaucer to Shakespeare.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1957). On the use of auxiliaries to form the perfect and the pluperfect in late Middle English and early Modern English. Studia Linguistica 11: 54–6.Google Scholar
(1959). On the use of auxiliaries to form the perfect and the pluperfect in late Middle English and early Modern English. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 196: 152–3.Google Scholar
(1925). The periphrastic future with shall and will in Modern English. PMLA 40: 963–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970). Demonstrativum und bestimmter Artikel. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 69: 209–22.Google Scholar
(1954). Theory of Prosody in Eighteenth-Century England. (Connecticut College Monograph 5.) New London: Connecticut College.Google Scholar
(1912). The origin of would rather and some of its analogues. Englische Studien 45: 381–96.Google Scholar
(1929). The conversion of the indirect personal object into the subject of a passive construction. English Studies 11: 1–11, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1930a). The passive of a verb accompanied by a preposition. English Studies 12: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1930b). Some notes on the history of the progressive form. Neophilologus 15: 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1910). The History and Use of the Suffixes -ery (-ry), -age and -ment in English. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
(1982). Shakespeare's Latinate neologisms. Shakespeare Studies 15: 149–170. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987) ,207–28.Google Scholar
(1983). Latin–Saxon hybrids in Shakespeare and the Bible. Studies in the Humanities 10: 39–44. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987) ,229–34.Google Scholar
(1619). Logonomia Anglica.London: John Beale. Facsimile edn. & (eds.). (Stockholm Studies in English 26.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1972.Google Scholar
(1787). A Provincial Glossary. London: S. Hooper. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 63, 1968] (2nd edn. 1790)Google Scholar
(1972 [1619]). Logonomia anglica. (Stockholm Studies in English, 26, 27). , & (eds.), , (tr.). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
2(1621). Logonomia anglica. London: Joh. Beale (first 1619). [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 68, 1968] (1785). A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue. London: S. Hooper. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 80, 1968]Google Scholar
(1991). Transition areas versus focal areas in English dialectology. English World-Wide 12: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
= (1766). The Vicar of Wakefield in (ed.). (1966). Collected Works of Oliver Goldsmith, vol. IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1984). The interplay of syntax and semantics in the development of the English modals. In & (eds.). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development.Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield ,149–59.Google Scholar
(1987). Lexical loss and lexical survival: the case of Scots and English. Scottish Language 6: 1–20. Reprinted in Görlach (1990) ,123–43.Google Scholar
(1990a). Studies in the History of the English Language. (Anglistische orschungen 210). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
(1990d). ‘The study of Early Modern English variation – the Cinderella of English historical linguistics?’ In (1990a) 108–22 (1st edn. 1988).Google Scholar
(1990e). ‘Lexical loss and lexical survival – the case of Scots and English’. In (1990a) 123–43 (1st edn. 1987).Google Scholar
(1991). Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge University Press, ch. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995a). New Studies in the History of the English Language. (Anglistische Forschungen 232.) Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
(1992). The development of a scientific language in the seventeenth century. In et al. (1992) ,319–43.Google Scholar
(1983). Hen's Teeth and Horses' Toes. Further Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
(1594). Grammatica anglicana.Cambridge: Legatt. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 169, 1969]Google Scholar
(1959). Studies in the Syntax of the King James Version.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
= (a1771). The Complete Poems of Thomas Gray, English, Latin and Greek. & (eds.). (1966). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1983). Middle English Studies presented to Norman Davis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frier Bacon = (c. 1590). The Honorable Historie of Frier Bacon, and Frier Bongay. (ed.). Oxford: Malone Society Reprints.Google Scholar
(1711). An Essay Towards a Practical English Grammar.London: R. Tookey. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.Google Scholar
et al. (eds.). (1988). Kissing the Rod: an Anthology of Seventeenth-Century Women's Verse.London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
(1976). Cohesion in Literary Texts: a Study of Some Grammatical and Lexical Features of English Discourse.The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1699). The Autobiography of Anne Lady Halkett.J. (ed.). (1875). London: Camden Society, ns 13.Google Scholar
(1881). On the origin of had rather go and analogous or apparently analo gous locutions. American Journal of Philology 2: 281–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1971). English Stress: Its Form, Its Growth, and Its Role in Verse.New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
, et al. (1964). The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. ch. 4: ‘The users and uses of English’. London: Longman ,75–110.Google Scholar
(1963). The Two Harmonies: Poetry and Prose in the Seventeenth Century.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1989). Prosody and Purpose in the English Renaisssance.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1771). Hermes, or A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Universal Grammar. 3rd edn. London: J. Nourse & P. Vaillan.Google Scholar
(1985). Phonological Variation and Change. Studies in Hiberno-English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (eds.). (1986). Perspectives on the English Language in Ireland. Proceedings of the First Symposium on Hiberno-English. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.Google Scholar
(1985). Phonological Variation and Change. Studies in HiBerno-English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1986). ‘Expanding the superstrate: habitual aspect markers in Atlantic Englishes’. English World-Wide 7: 141–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1551). The Opening of the Unreasonable Writing of our Inglish Toung. BM Royal MS 17. C. VII. In (1955) ,109–64.Google Scholar
(1569). An Orthographie, conteyning the due Order and Reason, howe to Write or Paint Thimage of Mannes Voice, most like to the Life or Nature. London [no publisher given]. Reprinted in Danielsson (1955): 165–228.Google Scholar
(1569). An Orthographie.London: Seres. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 209, 1969]. Also in Danielsson (1955) ,165–228.Google Scholar
(1569). An Orthographie. London: Seres. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 209, 1969]Google Scholar
(1570). A Methode. In (ed.). (1955). John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation, Part 1. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,229–50.Google Scholar
(1955 [1551]). The Opening of the Unreasonable writing of our Inglish Toung. (Stockholm Studies in English, 5). In Danielsson (1955). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1963). John Hart's Works on English Orthographie and Pronunciation. In Danielsson 1963. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
1570. A Methode or Confortable Beginning for all vnlearned, whereby they may bee taught to read English, in a very short time, vvith pleasure. London: Henrie Denham. Reprinted in Danielsson (1955) ,229–48.Google Scholar
= Letter-book of Gabriel Harvey (1573–1980). (ed.). (1884). London: Camden Society, ns 33.Google Scholar
(1951). Modern English Word-Formation and Neo-Latin: a Study of the Origins of English (French, Italian, German) Copulative Compounds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1973). Parataxe, hypotaxe et corrélation dans la phrase latine. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 68: 47–86.Google Scholar
(1995). Ist allowed or aint it – on contraction in early grammars and spelling books. Studia Neophilologica 67: 165–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). The origin and development of Modern English periphrastic do. In & (eds.). Historical Linguistics I. Amsterdam: North-Holland ,159–89.Google Scholar
(1929). Changing tastes in the eighteenth century: a study of Dryden's and Dodsley's Miscellanies. PMLA 44: 510–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). (1975). Proceedings of the eleventh International Congress of Linguists. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
(1992). Forms of Nationhood: the Elizabethan Writing of England.Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1967). Studies in English Demonstrative Pronouns: a Contribution to the History of English Morphology.Oslo: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
(1974). Touches of Sweet Harmony: Pythagorean Cosmology and Renaissance Poetics.San Marino: Huntingdon Library.Google Scholar
(1985). Writing and Revolution in Seventeenth-Century England. The Collected Essays of Christopher Hill, vol. I. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
(1983a). The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb: the Evidence from some Old and Early Middle English Texts (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Series B 160). Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
(1983b). Phrasal verbs in English grammar books before 1800. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 84: 376–86.Google Scholar
(1994). On phrasal verbs in Early Modern English: notes on lexis and style. In (1994) ,129–40.Google Scholar
(1643). A special Help to Orthographie: or, the true-writing of English. London: Cotes. [Extracts in Ellis (1874), 1018–1024.]Google Scholar
(1644). The English Primrose.London: Cotes. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 183, 1969]Google Scholar
(1653). Most Plain Directions for True-Writing.London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 118, 1968]Google Scholar
(1964). On the Concept of Standard English and the History of Modern English Pronunciation. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
(1988). ‘Talking proper’: schooling and the establishment of English ‘Received Pronunciation’. In & . (eds.). An Historic Tongue. London: Routledge ,209–27.Google Scholar
(1659). The Petty Schoole. London: J. T. for A. Crooke. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 133, 1969]Google Scholar
(1994). The use of thou and you in Early Modern spoken English: evidence from depositions in the Durham ecclesiastical court records. In (1994) ,141–51.Google Scholar
(1989). A Natural History of Negation.Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
and . (1954). Laut und Leben. Englishe Lautgeschichte der neueren Zeit. (1400–1950). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
& (1954). Laut und Leben. Englische Lautgeschichte der neueren Zeit (1400–1950). 2 vols. Berlin: Deutsche Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
(1989). The English gerund: syntactic change and discourse function. In & (eds.). Language Change and Variation.Amsterdam: John Benjamins ,173–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1662). Of Divers Superfluous Letters in the English Orthography. In A New English Grammar […] for Forreners to learn English.London: Williams, Brome & Marsh ,83–9.Google Scholar
(1991). Swearing: a Social History of Foul Language, Oaths and Profanity in English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1941). The Correspondence of Lady Katherine Paston, 1603–1627. Norfolk Record Society.Google Scholar
(1947). On the origin of the grammarians' rules for the use of shall and will. PMLA 62: 1178–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1552). Abecedarium anglico-latinum.London: Riddel. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 208, 1970]Google Scholar
(1925 (1865) [c. 1617]). Of the Orthographie and Congruitie of the Britan Tong. (ed.). Early English Text Society, old series 5.Google Scholar
(c. 1617). Of the Orthographie and Congruite of the Britan Tong. ed. (1865), Early English Text Society, old series 5.Google Scholar
(1661). Libellus orthographicus.London: Hancock & Cossinet. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 94, 1968]Google Scholar
(1983). On the notion “possible grammatical change”: a look at a perfectly good change that did not quite make it. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 15: 15–75.Google Scholar
(1981). Preverbal Adverbs and Auxiliaries: a Study of Word Order Change.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1951). Inversion in English with Special Reference to the Early English Period.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1909–1949). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
(1909–1949). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
(1917). Negation in English and other languages. De Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser I: 5. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
(1942). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. vol. 6. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
(1946). Growth and Structure of the English Language. 9th edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1949). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
(1958). On the be and have constructions with mutative verbs. Studia Linguistica 12: 106–18.Google Scholar
(1997). A corpus study of existential clauses: register variation and discourse function. In & (1997) ,303–18.Google Scholar
(1966). The pronoun of direct address in seventeenth-century English. American Speech 41: 261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967). The Formation of English Neo-classical Thought.Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1747). The Plan of a Dictionary of the English Language.London: J. & P. Knapton et al. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1970.Google Scholar
(1747). The Plan of a Dictionary.London: Knapton; Longman & Shewell; Hitch; Millar; Dodsley. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 223, 1970]Google Scholar
(1755 [1979]). A Dictionary of the English Language … and the English Grammar. London: W. Strahern. Reprinted London: Times Books.Google Scholar
(1755). A Dictionary of the English Language: in which the Words are deduced from their Originals, and illustrated in their Different Significations by Examples from the Best Writers. 2 vols. London: J. F. & C. Rivington.Google Scholar
(1755). Dictionary of the English Language. London; reprinted London: Times Books (1983); new edition by , London: Longman et al., (1818); “Preface to A Dictionary of the English Language”. In (1966) ,129–56.Google Scholar
(1765). Mr Johnson's Preface to his Edition of Shakespear's Plays.London: J. & R. Tonson et al.Google Scholar
(1779–1981). The Lives of the English Poets; and a Criticism on their works. 3 vols. Dublin: Messrs Whitestone et al.Google Scholar
(1764). A Pronouncing and Spelling Dictionary. London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 95, 1968]Google Scholar
(1701). Dr John Jones's Practical Phonography. London: Richard Smith. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 167, 1969]Google Scholar
(1701). Practical phonography.London: Smith. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 167, 1969]Google Scholar
(1951). The Seventeenth Century: Essays by Richard Foster Jones and Others Writing in his Honor.Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1953). The Triumph of the English Language: a Survey of Opinions Concerning the Vernacular from the Introduction of Printing to the Restoration. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1640 [1954]). The English Grammar. In & (eds.). Ben Jonson, vol VIII. The Poems. The Prose Works. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1640). The English Grammar. In Works, London. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 349, 1972]Google Scholar
(1640). The English Grammar. Made by Ben. Johnson. For the benefit of all Strangers, out of his Observations of the English language now spoken, and in use. In The Workes of Benjamin Ionson, II.31–84. London: Richard Bishop.Google Scholar
(1925). The English Grammar: Introduction by C. H. Herford & P. Simpson. In The Works,Oxford: Clarendon Press, II ,415–35.Google Scholar
(1947 [1640]). The English Grammar. In & (eds.). The Works,Oxford: Clarendon Press, VIII, 455–61 (The text); 463–553 (The grammar). [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 349, 1972]Google Scholar
(1952). The English Grammar; a Commentary by C. H. Herford & P. & E. Simpson. In The Works.Oxford: Clarendon Press, XI ,165–218.Google Scholar
(1598–1633 [1925–1947]). Ben Jonson. 8 vols. & (eds.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1947). Shakespeare's Use of the Arts of Language.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Between hypotaxis and parataxis. Clauses of reason in Ancrene Riwle. In (1991) ,203–20.Google Scholar
(1956). Der indefinite Agens von Chaucer bis Shakespeare: die Wörter und Wendungen für ‘man’.Meisenheim/Glan: Hain.Google Scholar
(1976). The perfect auxiliaries in the language of Shakespeare. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 8: 45–53.Google Scholar
, , [1762]. Elements of Criticism. 2 vols. 6th edn. Edinburgh & London, 1785. Facsimile edn. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1993.Google Scholar
(1985). Deverbal nouns in Old and Modern English: from stem-for-mation to word-formation? In (1985) ,221–61.Google Scholar
(1986a). The problem of productivity in word-formation. Linguistics 24: 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986b). Problems in the morphological analysis of complex lexical items. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36: 93–107.Google Scholar
(1992a). Semantics and Vocabulary. In (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Language, I. Cambridge University Press ,290–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992b). The formats change – the problems remain: word-formation theory between 1960 and 1990. In (ed.). Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins ,285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (eds.). (1988) Luick revisited. Papers read at the Luick-Symposium at Schloβ Liechtenstein, 15.–18.9.1985.Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1994). Studies in Early Modern English (Topics in English Linguistics 13). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
(1979a). Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55: 332–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1887). Zur Sprache Christopher Marlowes.Vienna: Verlag der K. K. Staats-oberrealschule.Google Scholar
(1987). Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English.Dordrecht: Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Syntactic change and the history of English modals. Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 16.Google Scholar
(1985). Elocution and general phonetic theory: John Herries. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 7: 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979). On that that that that became that which which became what. In , & (eds.). Papers from the Fifteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.Chicago Linguistic Society ,185–96.Google Scholar
(1920). The Modern English Verb–Adverb Combination (Stanford University Publications in Language and Literature 1: 1). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1784). A Rhetorical Grammar of the English Language. London: Cadell & Longman. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 332, 1972]Google Scholar
(1979). Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries: the Old-Word Tradition in English Lexicography down to 1721 and Speght's Chaucer Glossaries. Leiden University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1702). A New English Dictionary. London. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 140, 1969]Google Scholar
(1708). Dictionarium Anglo-Britannicum. London. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 156, 1969]Google Scholar
(1991). For to Speke French Trewely. The French Language in England, 1000–1600: its Status, Description and Instruction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& . (1963). Desiderius Erasmus On Copia of Words and Ideas.Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
(1746). A New English Grammar: a Guide to the English Tongue, with Notes. London: Manby & Cox. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 297, 1971]Google Scholar
(1971–1972). An Historical Outline of English Syntax, I–II. Aarhus: Akademisk Boghandel.Google Scholar
(1994). Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1992). Subordinating uses of and in the history of English. In et al. (1992) ,310–18.Google Scholar
(1986). Semantic Change and Componential Analysis: an Inquiry into Pejorative Developments in English (Eichstätter Materialen 9). Regensburg: Pustet.Google Scholar
(1964). Negation in English. In & (eds.). The Structure of Language.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall ,246–323.Google Scholar
(1985). Personification and the Sublime: Milton to Coleridge.Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). ‘The due order and reason’: on the histories of English spelling. Folia Linguistica Historica 12: 209–18.Google Scholar
(1961). The Word ‘Irony’ and Its Context, 1500–1755. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
(1978). On the development of an awareness of English syntax in early (1550–1660) descriptions of word order by English grammarians, logicians and rhetoricians. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 79: 44–58.Google Scholar
(1938–1939). (1621) on the dialects of South and East England. Studia Neophilogica II.
(1985). Where do concessives come from? On the development of concessive connectives. In (1985) ,263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). The impersonal use of verbs in Shakespeare's plays. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 21 ,41–56.Google Scholar
(1962). Studies in the Vocabulary of English Drama 1550–1600, excluding Shakespeare and Ben Jonson (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B 84). Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
(1968). Repetitive Word Pairs in Old and Early Middle English Prose.Annales Universitatis Turkuensis. Turku.Google Scholar
(1968). Repetitive Word Pairs in Old and Early Middle English Prose (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B 107). Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
(1967). Grundzüge der englischen Semantik (Wiener Beiträge zur englischen Philologie 70). Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
(1989). Function and grammar in the history of English: periphrastic do. In & (eds.). Language Change and Variation.Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins ,133–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985). The purloined Letter: evidence and probability regarding Robert Langham's authorship. The Library, 6th series 7: 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1992). A language in transition: the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. ICAME Journal 16: 7–27.Google Scholar
& (1983). The syntactic study of early American English: the variationist at the mercy of his corpus?Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 84: 470–90.Google Scholar
& (1993). ‘By and By Enters [This] My Artificiall Foole’: searching for syntactic constructions in the Helsinki Corpus. In et al. (1993).Google Scholar
(1991). Variation and diachrony, with American English in Focus. Studies on CAN/MAY and SHALL/ WILL.Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(1991). Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus: Studies on CAN/MAY and SHALL/WILL. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(1994). BE vs. HAVE with intransitives in Early Modern English. In , & (eds.). English Historical Linguistics 1992.Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins ,179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. 3rd edn. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
(1997). Be/have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransi-tives from Late Middle to Modern English. In et al. (eds.), (1997a) ,17–85.Google Scholar
, compiled (1996). Manual to the Diachronic Part of The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts; Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
& . (1997). Learning from the Early Modern English dictionaries corpus. In , & (eds.), Tracing the Trail of Time: Proceedings from the Second Diachronic Corpora Workshop. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi ,47–61.Google Scholar
(1974). From Signs to Propositions: the Concept of Form in Eighteenth-Century Semantic Theory.London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1700). A Key to the Art of Letters.London: A. & J. Churchil & J. Wild. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.Google Scholar
(1933). Select Studies in Colloquial English of the Late Middle Ages.Lund: Gleerupska Univ. Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
(1946). The roots of the propword one. Studier i modern språkvetenskap utgivna av Nyfilologiska Sällskapet i Stockholm 16: 97–138.Google Scholar
(1976). English Phonology and Phonological Theory: Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). The Shape of English. Structure and History. London & Melbourne: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
(1988). Vowel shifts, great and otherwise: remarks on Stockwell and Minkova. In & (1988) ,395–410.Google Scholar
(1989). How early does English get modern? Or, what happens if you listen to orthoepists and not to historians? Diachronica VI (1).Google Scholar
(1990). Where do Extraterritorial Englishes come from? Dialect input and recodification in transported Englishes. In et al. (1990) ,245–80.Google Scholar
(1992a). The Early Modern English vowels noch einmal, again: a reply to Minkova and Stockwell. Diachronica IX (1) ,1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992b). What, if anything, was the Great Vowel Shift? In Rissanen et al.(1992) ,144–55.Google Scholar
(1994). Proliferation and option-cutting: the strong verb in the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries. In & (1994) ,81–114.Google Scholar
(1997). Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1758). Lectures Concerning Oratory.Dublin: George Faulkner. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.Google Scholar
(1966). Linguistics and the figures of rhetoric. In (ed.). Essays on Style and Language.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ,135–156.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1968). Directions for Historical Linguistics: a Symposium. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
(1959). Die Entstehung des neuenglischen its. Mélanges de Linguistique et de Philologie: Fernand Mossé in memoriam. Paris: Didier ,231–7.Google Scholar
(1985). The influence of semantic fields on semantic change. In (1985) ,283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1941). Französische Lehnwörter und Lehnbedeutungen im Englischen des 18. Jahrhunderts. Bochum-Langendreer: Pöppinghaus.Google Scholar
(1929). The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700–1800. (University of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature 25). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
(1984). The Greek diacritical marks and their application to other languages in the Renaissance. General Linguistics 24: 21–37.Google Scholar
(1570). Manipulus vocabulorum. (ed.). (1867), Manipulus vocabulorum: a Rhyming Dictionary of the English Language, by Peter Levins (1570). Early English Text Society, old series 27.Google Scholar
(1570). Manipulus Vocabulorum. London: Henrie Bynneman for John Waley [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 195, 1969]; ed. , 1867, EETS 27.Google Scholar
(1937). English Verb–Adverb Groups Converted into Nouns (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 9: 5). Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
(1984). Punctuation. In & (eds.). Research in Composition and Rhetoric: a Bibliographic Sourcebook. Westport, CT & London: Greenwood Press: 371–98.Google Scholar
(1700 [1690]). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. (ed.). (1975). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
[1690]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. . Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1742 [1655–1656]). Letters. In A Collection of the State Papers of John Thurloe, Esq.London: Gyles, Woodward & Davis, IV.Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (1987). New edn. London: Longman.
(1762). A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London: J. Hughs for [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 18, 1967]Google Scholar
(1775 [1979]). A Short Introduction to English Grammar. Scholars'facsimi les and reprints. New York: Delmar.Google Scholar
(1973). Consistency and correctness in the orthographic usage of John Capgrave's Chronicle. Studia Neophilologica 45: 323–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1896). Untersuchungen zur englischen Lautlehre. Strasburg: Trübner. (1914/1941). Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Leipzig: Tauchnitz. Reprinted: 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1906). Beiträge zur englischen Grammatik IV: der Ursprung der Fügung a good one. Anglia 29: 339–46.Google Scholar
(1977). Deixis and anaphora. In (ed.). The Development of Conversation and Discourse.Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(1988). The transition from the impersonal to the personal use of the verb like in late Middle English and Early Modern English – some previously neglected determinants of variation. In (1988) ,210–18.Google Scholar
(1712). The English Grammar.London: Clements. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 6, 1967]Google Scholar
(1905 [1561]). Interpungendi ratio. In & . Punctuation: its Principles and Practice.London: Routledge, tr. in appendix B.Google Scholar
(1644). The Sea-mans Dictionary. London: G. M. for John Bellamy. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 328, 1972]Google Scholar
(1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: a Synchronic–Diachronic Approach. 2nd edn. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
(1988). Middle English and Early Modern English letters as the basis of a linguistic corpus. In , et al. (eds.). Historical English. Innsbruck University ,167–85.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1988). Historical English, on the Occasion of Karl Brunner's 100th Birthday.Innsbruck: AMOEGoogle Scholar
= (1586–1593). The Complete Works of Christopher Marlowe 1–2. (ed.). (1973). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1749). Lingua Britannica Reformata. London: for S. Birt etc. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 258, 1970] (2nd edn. 1754).Google Scholar
(ed.). (1988). Ovid Renewed: Ovidian Influences on Literature and Art from the Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1931). The Beginnings of American English. Essays and Comments. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1964). Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Studies.New York: Columbia University Press, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1995). Pronouns and terms of address in Shakespearean English: a socio-affective marking system in transition. Vienna English Working Papers 4 (1): 20–42.Google Scholar
(1992). What were Robert Cawdrey's Hard Words? Learned terms in A Table Alphabeticall (1604). In Pahta et al. (1992) ,51–8.Google Scholar
(1997). Lexicography and Physicke. The Record of Sixteenth-Century English Medical Terminology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1996). The Poetics of Sensibility: a Revolution in Literary Style.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1983). Present indicative plural forms in the Later Middle English of the North Midlands. In & (1983) ,235–44.Google Scholar
(1986). Common and Courtly Language: the Stylistics of Social Class in Eighteenth-Century English Literature.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1953). Der indefinite Agens im Mittelenglischen 1050–1350: die Wörter und Wendungen für ‘man’.Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1977). Langues en contact: pidgins-creoles – (languages in contact). Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 75. Tübingen: TBL-Verlag Narr.Google Scholar
(1945). Multiple meaning and change of meaning in English. Language 21: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Variation and Change in Early Scottish Prose, Studies Based on the Helsinki Corpus of Older Scots. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
(1993). Variation and Change in Early Scottish Prose; Studies Based on the Helsinki Corpus of Older Scots (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Dissertationes Humanarum Litterarum 65). Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
(1970). English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). The Teaching of English from the Sixteenth Century to 1870.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middle English Dictionary (1954–). Prepared & et al. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(1685). Nouvelle M'ethode pour Apprendre l'Anglois. London: Thomas Basset. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 216, 1970]Google Scholar
(1687). The Grounds of the French Tongue.London: Basset. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 157, 1969]Google Scholar
(1688). The English Grammar.London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 152, 1969]Google Scholar
(1964). Eras and Modes in English Poetry. Revised edition. University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1967). Style and Proportion: The Language of Prose and Poetry.Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
(1967). A Quantitative Approach to the Style of Jonathan Swift.The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1966). Pronominal case in Shakespearian imperatives. Language 42: 10–17. Reprinted in & (1987) ,301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983). On the sociolinguistic history of /h/-dropping in English. In , et al., (eds.) Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics. Odense University Press ,37–54.Google Scholar
(1983). On the sociolinguistic history of /h/-dropping in English. In et al. (1983) ,37–54.Google Scholar
(1992). Middle English dialectology. In , (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English language, II. 1476-1776. Cambridge University Press ,156–206.Google Scholar
Paradise Lost= (1667 [1952]). Paradise Lost in (ed.). (1952). The Poetical Works of John Milton I-II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1997). Constraint ranking in Middle English stress-shifting. English Language and Linguistics 1 (1): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1990). The Early Modern English vowels: more O’ Lass. Diachronica VII (2): 199–214.Google Scholar
(1958). Relative pronouns in Shakespeare's colloquial English. In , T. Egawa, & (eds.). Studies in English Grammar and Linguistics: a Miscellany in Honour of Takanobu Otsuka.Tokyo: Kenkyusha ,335–49.Google Scholar
(1992). Relative constructions and functional amalgamation in Early Modern English. In et al (1992) ,336–51.Google Scholar
(1935). The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in Eighteenth-Century England.New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
[1557] = (1557). The Workes of Sir Thomas More wrytten by him in the Englysh Tonge. Ed. . London.Google Scholar
= (1963–). The Complete Works of St Thomas More 1–15. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1972). The Religious Sublime: Christian Poetry and Critical Tradition in Eighteenth-Century England.Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
& (1995). The lexical Scandinavian element in Early Modern English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 96 (4): 339–415.Google Scholar
(1938). Histoire de la forme périphrastique ‘^tre’ +participe présent en Germanique.Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
(1952). A Handbook of Middle English, tr. . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1969). Writing. In and (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Linguistics, Information and Control. Oxford: Pergamon Press ,627–33.Google Scholar
(1976). Spelling junctions in English. In (ed.). Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Applied Linguistics. Stuttgart: Hochschul Verlag ,469–79.Google Scholar
(1990). The writing of language. In (ed.). An Encyclopaedia of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1962 [1958: 1683–1684]). Mechanick Exercises. 2nd (modern) edn. & (eds.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1960). Collected Poems of Sir Thomas Wyatt. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1582). The First Part of the Elementarie. London: Vautroullier. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 219, 1970]Google Scholar
(1967). ‘Thou’ and ‘You’ in Shakespeare: a study in the second person pronoun. Engish Studies 48: 1–9. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987).Google Scholar
(ed.). (1983). Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric.University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1795). English Grammar. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 106, 1968]Google Scholar
(1958). The English Syntactical Type ‘One the best man’ and its Occurrence in other Germanic Languages.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
(1959). The Middle English syntactical type his own hand(s) with his own hands, himself with reference to other similar expressions. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 60: 267–86.Google Scholar
(1960). A Middle English Syntax. I. Parts of Speech.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
(1980). Grammatical peculiarities of the contact-clause in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 1: 171–84.Google Scholar
(1984). Explorations into syntactic obsoleteness: English a-X-ing and X-ing. In (1984) ,363–81.Google Scholar
(1988). A word on the regulation of the auxiliary do: Samuel Pepys's Diary as a test case. Mulberry 37 ,113–45.Google Scholar
(1784). Elements of Orthoepy: containing a Distinct View of the Whole Analogy of the English Language: so far as it relates to Pronunciation, Accent, and Quantity. London: T. Payne & Son.Google Scholar
= . (1589–1601). The Works of Thomas Nashe. 4 vols. & (eds.). (1958. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1974). Synchron-diachrone Untersuchungen zur Expanded Form im Englischen: eine struktural-funktionale Analyse.Munich: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
(1971). Towards a diachronic analysis of vocabulary. Cahiers de lexicologie 18: 29–42.Google Scholar
& (1989). A corpus of Early Modern Standard English in a socio-historical perspective. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 90: 67–110.Google Scholar
& . (1993). Its strength and the beauty of it: the standardisation of the third person neuter possessive in Early Modern English. In & (1994) ,171–216.Google Scholar
& (1997). To Explain the Present: Studies in the changing English language in honor of Matti Rissanen.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
& (1986). Do you support the do-support? Emphatic and non-emphatic do in affirmative statements in present-day spoken English. In (ed.). Papers from the the Third Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,35–50.Google Scholar
(1983). A corpus of colloquial Early Modern English for a lexical–syntactic study: evidence for consistency and variation. In (ed.), Papers from the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation (Stockholm Studies in English 57). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,109–22.Google Scholar
(1983). A corpus of colloquial Early Modern English for a lexical–syntactic study: evidence for consistency and variation. In (ed.). Papers from the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation. (Acta Universitatis Stockholmensis 57.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,109–22.Google Scholar
(1987). Change from above: a morphosyntactic comparison of two Early Modern English editions of The Book of Common Prayer. In (ed.). Neophilologica Fennica.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique ,295–315.Google Scholar
(1991). ‘BUT', ‘ONLY', ‘JUST’: Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English 1500–1900 (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique 51). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
(1997). The processes of adverb derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. In , & (eds.). Grammaticalization at Work, Studies of Long-term Developments in English (Topics in English Linguistics 24). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter ,145–189.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1997). To Explain the Present. Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Memoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
(1974). Background and history of the parenthetic as who say/saith in Old and Middle English literature. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 75: 568–601.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1988). An Historic Tongue. Studies in English Linguisticsin Memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
, & (eds.). (1992). Early Modern English: Trends, Forms and Texts (Biblioteca della ricerca, Cultura straniera 49). Fasano: Schena.Google Scholar
(1978). ‘Hack at Tom Poley's’: Swift's use of puns. In (ed.). The Art of Jonathan Swift.London: Vision ,43–56.Google Scholar
& , (eds.). (1992). The Penguin Book of Renaissance Verse 1509–1659.London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
(1992). Names of Sicknesses in English, 1400–1550: an Exploration of the Lexical Field (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Dissertationes Humanarum Litterarum 63). Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
(1998). Names of Body Parts in English, 1400–1550 (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Humaniora 291). Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
(1985). The Bible as a reviver of words: the evidence of Anthony Purver, a mid-eighteenth-century critic of the English of the King James Bible. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86: 515–33.Google Scholar
(1990). The Linguistics of Punctuation. Stanford, CT: Centre for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
(1992). Man's son/son of man: translation, textual conditioning, and the history of the English genitive. In et al. (1992): 359–72.Google Scholar
& (1995). Lexical diffusion in semantic change: with special reference to universal changes. Folia Linguistica Historica 16/1–2: 29–73.Google Scholar
(1990). What has happened to ‘impersonal’ constructions?Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 91: 31–55.Google Scholar
(1963). Formal and informal spelling in the eighteenth century. English Studies 44: 267–75.Google Scholar
(1984). Informal spelling systems in Early Modern English: 1500–1800. In & (eds.). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development (CECTAL Conference Papers Series, No. 3). Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield ,123–36.Google Scholar
(1985). Spelling-book rules and the capitalisation of nouns in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In & (eds.). Historical and Editorial Studies on Medieval and Early Modern English. Groningen: Wolters- Noordhoff ,49–61.Google Scholar
(1990). Archaism. In et al. (eds.). The Spenser Encyclopedia.University of Toronto Press ,50–2.Google Scholar
(1984). Informal spelling systems in Early Modern English: 1500–1800. In & (1984),123–37Google Scholar
(1990). Lekker scrabbling: discovery and exploration of once-Dutch words in the onlineOxford English Dictionary. English Studies 71: 261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& . (1926). The compound words in Spenser's poetry. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 25 (4): 498–516.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1992). “As Who Say” – Many Happy Returns; Essays in Honour of Saara Nevanlinna. Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
(1997). A medieval case of grammaticalization: Methinks. In et al. (eds.). (1997b): 371–403.Google Scholar
(1965). The Rise of English Studies.University of Hull Publications. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1530). Lesclarcissement de la langue francoyse. London: J. Haukyns. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 190, 1969]Google Scholar
(1992). Pause and Effect: an Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West.Aldershot: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Pause and Effect: an Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Aldershot: Scolar.Google Scholar
(1974/1975). The Letter Book of John Parkhurst, Bishop of Norwich, Compiled during the Years 1571–5 (Publications of the Norfolk Record Society 43). Ed. . Norwich: Norfolk Record Society.Google Scholar
(1953). The Accidence of Ben Jonson's Plays, Masques and Entertainments. Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes.Google Scholar
(1964). The historical development of punctuation marks. In his Orthography in Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama. London: Arnold, appendix 8 ,182–94.Google Scholar
(1577). The Garden of Eloquence. London: H. Iackson. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 267, 1971]Google Scholar
(1593). The Garden of Eloquence. Facsimile edn. with an introduction by (Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints). Gainesville, FL, 1954.Google Scholar
(1997). The development of reflexive strategies in English. In et al. (eds.) (1997b): 277–370.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1899). Queen Elizabeth's Englishings of Boethius, Plutarch, jc. Early English Text Society, old series 113.Google Scholar
(1951). Chapters on the Language in Ben Jonson's Dramatic Works (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B 39). Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
(1966). Contributions to the Study of Back-Formation in English (Acta Academiae Socialis A 4). Tampere: Yhteiskunnallinen Korkeakoulu.Google Scholar
(1971a). On the Introduction of French Loan-Words into English (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis A 38). Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
(1971b). Conversion and Zero-Derivation in English (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis A 40). Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
= (1660–1619 [1970–1983]). The Diary of Samuel Pepys 1–11. & (eds.). London: G. Bell..Google Scholar
(1990). Time in motion: grammaticalization of the be going to construction in English. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 49–64.Google Scholar
(1658). The New World of English Words.London: Brooke. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 162, 1969]Google Scholar
(1969). The Heroic Couplet.Cleveland & London: The Press of Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
(1663). Practical Rhetorick. Or, certain little sentences varied according to the rules prescribed by Erasmus. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1972.Google Scholar
(1994). The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1982). The evolution of early standard English: the creolization hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14 ,69–86.Google Scholar
(1665). The Vocal Organ. Oxford: William Hall. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 227, 1970]Google Scholar
(1761). The Rudiments of English Grammar. London: for R. Griffiths. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 210, 1969]Google Scholar
(1762 [1970]). Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Menston: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
(1777). A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism.London: J. Johnson. Facsimile reprint ed. & , Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
(1589). The Arte of English Poesie. London: R. Field. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 110, 1968]Google Scholar
Spectator= (1711–1714). The Spectator. 5 vols. (ed.). (1965). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
[English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) = Facsimiles in English Linguistics, 1500–1800. See Alston (1974)] 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, No. 135, II ,32–6.Google Scholar
[1589]. The Arte of English Poesie. ed. & , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
, , & . (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
(1989). Das Perfect im Spätmittel- und Frühneuenglischen: eine Frequenz- und Funktionsanalyse anhand von Brieftexten.Innsbruck: Institut für Anglistik, University of Innsbruck.Google Scholar
(1585). The Rudimentes of P. Ramus his Latine Grammar.London: Walde-graue [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 306, 1971]Google Scholar
(1989). “X me no x's”: some examples (mainly from the Renaissance) of the neologizing imperative retort. American Speech 64: 233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1579). An Exposition of Certaine Difficult and Obscure Wordes and Termes of the Lawes of This Realme. London: R. Tottel. [EE 210, 1969]Google Scholar
& (1997). Dummies on the move: prop-ONE and affirmative DO in the 17th century. In & (eds.), (1997) ,395–417.Google Scholar
& (1997). Indefinite pronouns with singular human reference. In et al. (eds.). (1997b): 17–85.Google Scholar
(1991). The Noun Phrase in Early Sixteenth-Century English: a Study Based on Sir Thomas More's Writings.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
(1991). The Noun Phrase in Early Sixteenth-Century English: a Study Based on Sir Thomas More's Writings (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique 50). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
(1994a). The development of the compound pronouns in -body and -one in Early Modern English. In (1994) ,301–24.Google Scholar
(1994b). The position of adjectival modifiers in Late Middle English noun phrases. In et al. (eds.), (1994): 159–68.Google Scholar
(1674). A Collection of English Words not Generally Used. London (21691). [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 145, 1969]Google Scholar
(1934). On the Development of English Verbs from Latin and French Past Participles (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 6: 4). Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
(1936). On continuative relative clauses in English. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 9(3): 1–61.Google Scholar
(1936). Verb Doublets of Latin Origin in English (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 8: 4). Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
(1937). Some notes on the origin of the relative combination the which. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 38: 146–88.Google Scholar
Clarissa = (1747–1748 [1751]). Clarrisa, Or The History of a Young Lady. Everyman edition. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Pamela = (1739–1740 [1785]). Pamela, Or Virtue Rewarded … Everyman edition. London: Dent.Google Scholar
(1967). The Uses of ‘one’ in Old and Early Middle English.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
(1975). “Strange and inkhorne tearmes”, Loan-words as style markers in the prose of Edward Hall, Thomas Elyot, Thomas More and Roger Ascham. In (ed.). Style and Text. Stockholm: Skriptor ,250–62.Google Scholar
(1984). The choice of relative pronouns in seventeenth century American English. In (1984) ,417–35.Google Scholar
(1985). Periphrastic do in affirmative statements in Early American English. Journal of English Linguistics 18 ,163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991b). On the history of that/zero as object clause links in English. In & (eds.). English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik.London & New York: Longman ,272–89.Google Scholar
(1993). The development of the pronominal uses of one in Middle and Early Modern English. In et al. (1993).Google Scholar
, , & (eds.). (1992). History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.). (1993). Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
, & (eds.). (1997a). English in Transition. Corpus- based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.). (1997b). Grammaticalization at Work. Studies of Long-term Developments in English.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.). (1993). Enter the Helsinki Corpus: Computer-Assisted Approaches to English Historical Linguistics.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
, , & (eds.). (1992). History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1619). The Art of Pronuntiation. MS Bodl. Ashmole 1153. (ed.). (1957), The Phonetic Writings of Robert Robinson. Early English Text Society, old series 238.Google Scholar
& (1994). Remarks on the origin and evolution of abbreviations and acronyms. In , & (eds.). English Historical Linguistics 1992 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 113). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins ,261–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985). Literature and Popular Culture in Eighteenth-century England.Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
(1980). The relative clause marker in Scots English: diffusion, complexity and style as dimensions of syntactic change. Language in Society 9: 221–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981). Syntactic complexity, relativization and stylistic levels in Middle Scots. Folia Linguistica Historica 1: 56–77.Google Scholar
(1982). Socio-Historical Linguistics: its Status and Methodology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). Towards a typology of relative-clause formation strategies in Germanic. In (1984) ,437–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985). Variability in word formation patterns and productivity in the history of English. In (ed.). Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 34). Amsterdam: Benjamins, Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press ,451–65.Google Scholar
(1992). A Way with Words. The Language of English Renaissance Literature.London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1893). The absolute participle in Middle English and Modern English. PMLA 8 ,245–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1893). The Absolute Participle in Middle and Modern English.Baltimore: The Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
(1941). Poetic Diction in the English Renaissance from Skelton through Spenser.New York: Modern Language Association of America Revolving Fund Series. (reprint Kraus Reprint Corporation New York, 1966).Google Scholar
(1952). Fair, Foul, Nice, Proper, A Contribution to the Study of Polysemy (Gothenburg Studies in English 1). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1970). Plain, A Study in Co-Text and Context (Stockholm Studies in English 22). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
& (1987). The ‘be/have’ Variation with Intransitives in English.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1966). Relative Constructions in early Sixteenth-Century English, with Special Reference to Sir Thomas Elyot.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1970). Coordination of Relative Clauses in Sixteenth-Century English.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1984). The English Plant Names in ‘The Grete Herball’ (1526) (Stockholm Studies in English 71). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1987). Antedatings and Additions for Oxford English Dictionary from the Catalogue of Prints of Political and Personal Satire in the British Museum (Stockholm Studies in English 72). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1961). The development of relative pronouns in modern colloquial English: a statistical survey of the development of their usage seen in British prose plays from the sixteenth century to the present time. The Scientific Reports of Mugokawa Women's University 8: 67–89.Google Scholar
(1966). Sentence structures in colloquial Shakespearian English. Transactions of the Philological Society 1965. Reprinted in & (1987) ,265–300.Google Scholar
(1967). Elizabethan colloquial English in the Falstaff plays. Leeds Studies in English ns 1. Reprinted in & (1987) ,37–70.Google Scholar
(1970). Some functions of Shakespearian word-formation. Shakespeare Survey 23: 13–26. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987) ,193–206.Google Scholar
(1972). The Works of Francis Lodwick: a Study of his Writings in the Intellectual Context of the Seventeenth Century.London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1986). The spelling and punctuation of Shakespeare's time. In @@Wells & Taylor (1986), xlii–lvi.Google Scholar
(1988) [1962]). Early seventeenth-century punctuation as a guide to sentence structure. Review of English Studies ns 13: 347–60. Repr. in her The Study of Language in Seventeenth-Century England. Amsterdam: Benjamins ,47–60.Google Scholar
(1989). John Rastell and the normalization of early sixteenth-century orthography. In , and (eds). Essays on English Language in Honour of Bertil Sundby. Oslo: Novus Forlag ,289–301.Google Scholar
(1994). John Hart and the Beginnings of Phonetics in Sixteenth-Century England. In , & (eds.). Perspectives on English: Studies in Honour of Emma Vorlat, Louvain: Peeters ,1–20.Google Scholar
(1996 [1982]). Wh- and Yes/No questions; Charles Butler's Grammar (1633) and the history of a linguistic concept. In (ed.). Language form and linguistic variation: Papers dedicated to Angus McIntosh. Amsterdam: Benjamins,401–26. Reprinted in (1996). Language and Society in Early Modern England. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
& (1987). Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (eds.). (1987). A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972). Linguistic Evolution with Special Reference to English.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981). Spelling and dialect in the late and post Middle English periods. In & (eds.). So Meny People Langages and Tonges. Edinburgh: Benskin & Samuels ,43–54.Google Scholar
(1980). Documentation in the Oxford English Dictionary: Shakespeare and Nashe as Test Cases. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1989b). Early Modern English: Oxford English Dictionary, New Oxford English Dictionary, EMED. In (ed.). Dictionaries of English, Prospects for the Record of Our Language. Cambridge University Press ,66–74.Google Scholar
(1977). Der englische Wortschatz (Grundlagen der Anglistik und Amerikanistik 9). Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
(1982). Shakespeares Englisch (Grundlagen der Anglistik und Amerikanistik 12). Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
(1996). The 3rd plural present indicative in Early Modern English – variation and linguistic contact. In (1996) ,144–60.Google Scholar
(1964). The relative pronouns in the sixteenth century plays Roister Doister and Respublica. A frequency study. English Studies, Presented to R. W. Zandwoort on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. English Studies 45: Supplement ,84–9.Google Scholar
(1959). The English Language in Modern Times (since 1400).Warsaw: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
(1992). Who(m)? constraints on the loss of case marking of wh-pro-nouns in the English of Shakespeare and other poets of the Early Modern English period. In et al. (1992) ,437–52.Google Scholar
(1967). On the dating of NE ee and ea spellings from Middle English e and e. In & (eds.). Approaches in Linguistic Methodology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
(1974). History of English Spelling. Manchester University Press & New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
= (1672). Epsom-Wells. In The Complete Works of Thomas Shadwell2. Ed. . (1927). London: The Fortune Press (Alten).Google Scholar
= (a1616 [1623). The Complete Works. Original Spelling Edition. , , & (eds.). (1986). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1623). Comedies, Histories jc Tragedies [First Folio], facs. by , The Norton Facsimile. New York: Norton, 1968.Google Scholar
(1987). On the structure and understanding of poetic oxymoron. Poetics Today 8 (1): 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975). English Poetic Diction from Chaucer to Wordsworth.Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
= (1775–1759). The Plays of Richard Brinsley Sheridan. Everyman edition. London: J. M. Dent & Co.Google Scholar
(1761). A Dissertation on the Causes of the Difficulties which Occur in Learning the English Language. London: for R. and J. Dodsley [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 40, 1967]Google Scholar
(1762). A Course of Lectures on Elocution.London: Millar, R. & J. Dodsley, Davies [et al]. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 129, 1968]Google Scholar
(1762). A Course of Lectures on Elocution. London: W. Strahan. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 129, 1968]Google Scholar
(1780). A Geneal Dictionary of the English Language. Two volumes. London: for J. Dodsley. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 50, 1967]Google Scholar
(1780). A General Dictionary of the English Language. London: J. Dodsley. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 50, 1967]Google Scholar
(1781). A rhetorical grammar of the English language, calculated solely for the purposes of teaching propriety of pronunciation, and justness of delivery, in that tongue, by the organ of speech. Dublin: Price, Whitestone. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 146, 1969]Google Scholar
(1975). Noun-verb stress alternation: an example of lexical diffusion of a sound change in English. Journal of English Linguistics 43: 71ff.Google Scholar
(1970 [1892]). Principles of English Etymology. Second Series: The Foreign Element. College Park, MD: McGrath.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1873). Reprinted Glossaries. English Dialect Society, Series B; reprinted Vaduz: Kraus, 1965.Google Scholar
(1991). Thomas Hobbes: rhetoric and the construction of morality. Proceedings of the British Academy 76 ,1–61.Google Scholar
(1976). The possessive apostrophe: the development and decline of a crooked mark. College English 38: 175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(Stockholm Studies in English, 56). In (ed. & tr.). Sir Thomas Smith's Literary and Linguistic Works, III. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
(1568). De recta et emendata linguae anglicanae scriptione dialogus. In (ed. & tr.) (1963). Sir Thomas Smith: Literary and Linguistic Works [1542, 1549, 1568], III. Stockholm Studies in English, 56.Google Scholar
(1739). Dionysius Longinus on the Sublime.London: J. Watts. Facsimile edn. Delmar, New York: Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints, 1975.Google Scholar
(1970). The end-rhymes of Marvell, Cowley, Crashaw, Lovelace and Vaughan. Acta Academiae Aboensis, Ser: Humaniora, 39: 2.
(1951, 1958). Verb Syntax in John Dryden's Prose, 2 vols. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequistska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
(1957). Latin influence on English syntax. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique du Copenhague 11: 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980). From postmodification to premodification. In (ed.). Papers from the Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,77–84.Google Scholar
(1983). The growth of cataphoric personal and possessive pronouns in English. In , & (eds.). Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics.Odense: Odense University Press ,225–38.Google Scholar
(1602). The Workes of Our Ancient and Learned English Poet, Geffrey Chaucer, Newly Printed. London: A. Islip.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2(1602). The Workes of our Ancient and Learned English Poet, Geffrey Chaucer. London: Adam Islip for Bonham Norton.Google Scholar
(1973). The Harvard Concordance to Shakespeare. Cambridge, MA: The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1897). Studien zur Geschichte des englischen Pronomens im XV. und XVI. Jahrhundert.Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1908). Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1667). The History of the Royal-Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London.Google Scholar
(1988). The lascivious metaphor: the evolution of the plain style in the seventeenth century. Studia Neophilologica 60: 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1927). Der adnominale Genitiv und sein Ersatz im Mittelenglischen und Frühneuenglischen. Giessener Beiträge 3: 1–35.Google Scholar
(c. 1530). England in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth. Ed. . (1893). Early English Text Society, extra series.Google Scholar
& (1991 [1946]). The English Dictionary from Cawdrey to Johnson 1604–1755 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 57). New edn by . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1946). The English Dictionary from Cawdrey to Johnson, 1604–1755. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. (2nd edn. (ed.). (1991). Amsterdam: Benjamins.)Google Scholar
(1974). Grammatik und Variation von Flexionsformen in der Sprache des Shakespeare Corpus. Munich: Tudur.Google Scholar
(1985a). Natürlicher syntaktischer Sprachwandel: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der englischen ‘do’-Periphrase in Fragen. München: Tudur.Google Scholar
(1985c). Stylistic aspects of syntactic change. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 153–78.Google Scholar
(1986). Syntactic variation and change: the case of do in questions in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 7: 121–49.Google Scholar
(1990). The Semantics of Syntactic Change: Aspects of the Evolution of do in English. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 47.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (eds.). (1994). Towards a Standard English 1600–1800.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1973). English Word-Formation over Two Centuries: in Honour of Hans Marchand on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (Tübingen Beiträge zur Linguistik 34). Tübingen: TBL.Google Scholar
& . (1990). Literature, Language and Change: from Chaucer to the Present.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1961). The Middle English ‘long close’ and ‘long open’ mid vowels. Texas Studies in Literature and Language 2, 2459–2468.Google Scholar
& (1988a). The English vowel shift – problems of coherence and explanation. In & (1988) ,395–410. (1988b). A rejoinder to Lass. In & (1988), 411–18.Google Scholar
(1982). Some aspects of the history of the be +ing construction. In (ed.). Language Form and Linguistic Variation: Papers Dedicated to Angus McIntosh.Amsterdam: John Benjamins ,427–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1936). The Grammar of Spenser's Faerie Queene. (Linguistic Society of America Language Dissertations Series) University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1936). The Grammar of Spenser's Faerie Queene.Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
(1985). Towards a Dictionary of English Normative Grammar. Dictionaries 7: 151–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & . (1991). A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800 (DENG). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1991). A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 63). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). Sentence Adverbials in English: a Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation.Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
(1892–1898). A New English Grammar: Logical and Historical. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Journal to Stella = (1712–1713). Journal to Stella, I–II. (ed.). (1948). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
(1712). ‘A proposal for correcting, improving and ascertaining the English tongue.’ London: for Benj. Tooke. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 213, 1969]Google Scholar
(1972). Shakespeare's use of s endings of the verbs to do and to have in the First Folio. CLA Journal 16 214–31. Repr. Salmon & Burness 1987. (1976). Shakespeare's use of eth and es ending verbs in the First Folio. CLA Journal 19 Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987).Google Scholar
The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1993). Prepared Lesley Brown. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1956). 3rd rev. edn. Prepared , & . Rev. & ed. . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1963). Whence the semi-colon? In P.Foote and A. Brown. Early English and Norse Studies. London: Methuen ,191–5.Google Scholar
(1984 [1971]). Religion and the Decline of Magic; Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century England. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
(1984 [1983]). Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
(1982). Double negation and eighteenth-century English grammars. Neophilologus 66: 278–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985). Do-support in the writings of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu: a change in progress. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 127–51.Google Scholar
(1986). Negative do in eighteenth-century English: the power of prestige. Dutch Quarterly Review 16: 296–312.Google Scholar
(1987). The Auxiliary ‘do’ in Eighteenth-Century English: a Sociohistorical-Linguistic Approach.Dordrecht: JCG Printing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987). The Auxiliary ‘do’ in Eighteenth-Century English: a Sociohistorical-Linguistic Approach. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). The origin and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: a case of destigmatization. Nowele 16: 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Any as an indefinite determiner in non-assertive clauses: evidence from Present-day and Early Modern English. In (1994).Google Scholar
(1985). Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l'anglais contemporain. Paris & Geneva: Champion-Slatkine.Google Scholar
& (1991). The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In & (eds.). Approaches to Grammaticalization.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, I: 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& . (1980). Linguistics for Students of Literature.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
(1972). A History of English Syntax: a Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
(1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). From less to more situated in language: the unidirectionality of semantic change. In , , & (eds.). Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1529). A b c, etc. [A single sheet containing the alphabet, a series of simple syllables, the Lord's Prayer and a hymn to the Virgin.] See also T[olomeo] Ia[niculo]da Bressa: Vicenza, 1529…The additional characters invented by G G Trissino are employed. (British Library catalogue entry, pressmark C. 107. K.8).Google Scholar
(1930). On the Syntax of the English Verb from Caxton to Dryden.Prague: Jednota Československych Matematiku a Fysiku.Google Scholar
(1766). The difference between words esteemed synonymous, in the English language; and, the proper choice of them determined. London: for J. Dodsley. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 207, 1970]Google Scholar
[pseud. Edward Search, Esq.] (1773). Vocal Sound. London: T. Jones. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 165, 1969]Google Scholar
(1967). Protean Shape. A Study in Eighteenth-Century Vocabulary and Usage. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
(1726). The Oxford Spelling-Book. London: Hazard. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 41, 1967]Google Scholar
(1553). Respublica, an Interlude for Christmas 1553, Attributed to Nicholas Udall (EETS, os 226). Re-edited. (1952). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1973). Imperative constructions in Shakespeare. Studies in English Linguistics 2: 71–107.Google Scholar
(1953 [1554]). A lodging for the night. In (ed.). The Oxford Book of English Talk. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
The Provoked Wife = (1726). The Provoked Wife in The Complete Works of Sir John Vanbrugh, vol. I. & (eds.). (1925). Bloomsbury: The Nonesuch Press.Google Scholar
(1970). The Structure of English Orthography (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 82). The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970). Classical Rhetoric in English Poetry.London: Macmillan. Reissued with new preface and annotated bibliography by Southern Illinois University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
(1981). Rhetorical and anti-rhetorical tropes: on writing the history of elocutio. Comparative Criticism 3: 105–32.Google Scholar
(1985). The Royal Society and English prose style: a reassessment. In & , Rhetoric and the Pursuit of Truth, Los Angeles. Clark Memorial Library ,3–76.Google Scholar
(ed.). (1982). Rhetoric Revalued.Binghamton, N.Y: Centre for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
& (eds.). (1869). The Fraternitye of Vacabondes etc. London: Early English Text Society, extra series 9.Google Scholar
(1946, 1952). A Syntax of the English Language of St Thomas More. 2 vols. Louvain: Librairie Universitaire.Google Scholar
(1963–1973). An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 3 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
(1982). Evidence for spoken regional English in the sixteenth century. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 5: 1–25.Google Scholar
(1987). The treatment of dialect in English dictionaries. In (ed.). Studies in Lexicography. Oxford: Clarendon Press ,156–77.Google Scholar
(1988). The phonology of South-Western English 1500–1700. In . (ed.). Historical Dialectology, Regional and Social. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter ,609–44.Google Scholar
The Complete Works of St Thomas More 14.2. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.
(1983). Thou and you in Early Modern English: Brown and Gilman revisited. Studia Linguistica 37: 107–25 Reprinted in & (1987).Google Scholar
(1785).A Rhetorical Grammar. London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 266, 1971]Google Scholar
(1791). A critical pronouncing dictionary and expositor of the English language. London: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.Google Scholar
(1791). A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London: Robinson. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 117, 1968]Google Scholar
(1935). The development of the rhetoric and meter of the heroic couplet, especially in 1625–1645. PMLA 50: 166–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1653). Grammatica linguae anglicanae. Oxford: L. Lichfield [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 142, 1969]Google Scholar
(1653). Joannis Wallisii grammatica linguae anglicanae. 6th edn. London: William Bowyer. Ed & tr. J. A. Kemp (1972), John Wallis' Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1653). Joannis Wallisii grammatica linguae anglicanae. (ed.). (1972). John Wallis' Grammar of the English Language.London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1724). De ratione interpungendi. In . Elementa rhetorica. London: Tooke & Motte ,49–90.Google Scholar
(1983). Review article: D. W. Lightfoot, Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 19: 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). Reworking the history of English auxiliaries. In et al. (1990) ,537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Sense Developments: a Contrastive Study of the Development of Slang Senses and Novel Standard Senses in English (Stockholm Studies in English 80). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1940). The return of the enjambed couplet. English Literary History 7 (3): 239–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). (1962). Of Dramatic Poesy and Other Critical Essays by John Dryden. 2 vols. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
(1721). The Art of Reading and Writing English. London: Clark, Matthews & Ford. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 333, 1972]Google Scholar
(1789). Dissertations on the English Language: with Notes, Historical and Critical. Boston, MA: Isaiah Thomas. Reprinted (1951), Gainesville, FL: Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints.Google Scholar
(1975). Der Gebrauch von ‘shall/should’ und ‘will/would’ in englischer Prosa am Ende des 16. Jahrhunderts.Augsburg: Blasaditsch GmbH.Google Scholar
(1993). Britannia's Issue: The Rise of British Literature from Dryden to Ossian.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In & (eds.) ,95–195.Google Scholar
(1976). The aims, problems and values of A Dictionary of Early Modern English Pronunciation 1500–1800. In DEMEP ,9–39.Google Scholar
& (1986). William Shakespeare: the Complete Works. Original spelling edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1976). Statistische Studien zur Entwicklung des englischen Wortschatzes (Schweizer Anglistische Arbeiten 91). Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
(1654). The English-Grammar. London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 241, 1970]Google Scholar
(1982). From discourse to syntax: for in early English causal clauses. In (ed.). Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam: Benjamins ,385–93.Google Scholar
(1982). From discourse to syntax: for in Early English causal clauses. In (1982) ,385–93.Google Scholar
(1973). English Nominalizations in -ing Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
(1975). Yes–no Questions and Answers in Shakespeare's Plays: a Study in Text Linguistics.Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
(1668). An Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: Gellibrand. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 119, 1969]Google Scholar
(1688). An Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. London: Gellibrand. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 119, 1968]Google Scholar
(1976). Synaesthetic adjectives: a possible law of semantic change. Language 52: 461–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1935). The rhetorical pattern of neo-classic wit. Modern Philology 33: 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1951). The Senecan Amble: a Study in Prose Form from Bacon to Collier.London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
(1929). Colloquial Language of the Commonwealth and Restoration (The English Association Pamphlet 73). London.Google Scholar
(1553). The Arte of Rhetorique, for the Vse of All suche as are Studious of Eloquence, sette forth in English.London: R. Grafton.Google Scholar
(1963). The orthography and provenance of Henry Machyn. In & (eds.). Early English and Norse Studies. London: Methuen ,202–16.Google Scholar
(1948). Philosophic Words: a Study of Style and Meaning in the ‘Rambler’ and ‘Dictionary’ of Samuel Johnson.Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1973). Linguistic Change and the Great Vowel Shift in English. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1985). Natural Emphasis. English Versification from Chaucer to Dryden.San Marino: The Huntington Library.Google Scholar
(1940). Fifteenth Century Translation as an Influence on English Prose.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1994). Sources of London English: Medieval Thames Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1995). Middle English {-ende} and {-ing}: a possible route to gram-maticalization. In (ed.) (1995) ,356–82.Google Scholar
(1989a). Discourse, style and the rise of periphrastic do in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 10: 71–91.Google Scholar
(1989b). On the stylistic basis of syntactic change. Folia Linguistica Historica 10: 93–115.Google Scholar
(1994). The critic and the grammarians: Joseph Addison and the pre- scriptivists. In & (eds.). Towards A Standard English 1600–1800.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter ,243–84.Google Scholar
(1994a). The critic and the grammarians: Joseph Addison and the prescriptivists. In & (1994) ,243–284.Google Scholar
(1997). Speaker innovation, textual revision and the case of Joseph Addison. In & (1997) ,483–503.Google Scholar
(1989). A remarkable gap in the history of English syntax. Folia Linguistica Historica 9: 117–59.Google Scholar
(a1716). The Complete Works of William Wycherley. (ed.). (1965). New York: Russell & Russell Inc.Google Scholar
(1971). The syntax of the ing-forms in Thomas Kyd. The Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, University of Shimane 5: 33–64.Google Scholar
(1914). Northern English or London English as the standard pronunciation. Anglia 38: 405–32.Google Scholar
(1929). The Pronunciation of English Vowels 1400–1700. Göteborg: Wald, Zachrissons Boktryckeri A–B. [Reprinted 1971. New York: AMS Press.]Google Scholar
(1993). Early Middle English Word-Formation: Semantic Aspects of Derivational Affixation in the AB Language (Bamberger Beiträge zur Englischen Sprachwissenschaft 32). Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
(1973). Structural change in the English auxiliary system on the replacement of be by have. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 107–17.Google Scholar