Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:42:00.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliographies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Edited by
Roger Lass
Roger Lass
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of the English Language , pp. 669 - 728
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1680). A Treatise of Stops, Points or Pauses.London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 65, 1968]
Anon. (1682). Friendly advice to the correctour of the English Press at Oxford concerning the English Orthographie.London: Clavell.
Anon. (1704a). The Expert Orthographist. [London.]
Anon. (1704b). Right Spelling very much Improved.London: (?) the Author.
Anon. (1711). A Needful Attempt, to Make Language and Divinity Plain and Easie.London: Morphew; Cambridge: Smith. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 154, 1969]
(German original 1978, 2nd edn 1994.)
[Philly], J. (1664). The Arrainment of Christendom. [?Rotterdam.] [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 293, 1971]Google Scholar
Abbott, E. A. (1870). A Shakespearian Grammar.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D. (1937). tiз ‘transkrip∫ns’. Le Maître Phonétique 59: 34–6.Google Scholar
Adams, J. (1799). The Pronunciation of the English Language. Edinburgh: for the author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 72, 1968]Google Scholar
Adamson, S. M. (1989). With double tongue: diglossia, stylistics and the teaching of English. In Short, M. (ed.). Reading, Analysing and Teaching Literature,London: Longman ,204–40.Google Scholar
Adamson, S. M. (1994). From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: stylisation and (de-) subjectivisation as processes of language change. Transactions of the Philological Society 92 (1): 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, S., Law, V., , N. Vincent & Wright, S. (eds.). (1990). Papers from the Fifth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addision, Spectator. See Spectator.
Addison, J. (1987 [1711]). The Spectator. Bond, D. F. (ed.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolph, R. (1968). The Rise of Modern Prose Style.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1985). Metaformations: Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ahlqvist, A. (ed.). (1982). Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Åkerlund, A. (1911). On the History of the Definite Tenses in English.Cambridge: Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar
Åkerlund, A. (1913/1914). A word on the passive definite tenses. Englische Studien 47: 321–37.Google Scholar
Åkerlund, A. (1936/1937). I go a-fishing: an historical and geographical sketch of the a-phrase in its active significance. Studia Neophilologica 9: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrow, K. H. (1972). The English Writing System. London: Longman, for the Schools Council.Google Scholar
Alderson, S. (1996a). Swift and the pun. Swift Studies 11: 47–57.Google Scholar
Alderson, S. (1996b). The Augustan attack on the pun. Eighteenth-Century Life 20: 1–19.Google Scholar
Allen, C. (1986). Reconsidering the history of Like. Journal of Linguistics 22: 375–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, A. (1962). Toward an Augustan Poetic: Edmund Waller's “Reform” of English Poetry.Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Alston, R. C. (1965ff.). A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
Alston, R. C. (1966). Bibliography and historical linguistics. The Library. 5th series 21: 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, R. C. (1974). A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. A corrected reprint of volumes I–x. Ilkley: Janus Press.Google Scholar
Altenberg, B. (1982). The Genitive v. the of Construction: a Study of Syntactic Variation in Seventeenth-Century English.Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Altenberg, B. (1984). Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38: 20–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amis, G. T. (1976). The structure of the Augustan couplet, Genre 9: 37–58.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, S. (1976). A Descriptive Syntax of Christopher Marlowe's Language.Tokyo: University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Arthos, J. (1949). The Language of Natural Description in Eighteenth Century Poetry.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ascham, Toxophilus=Ascham, R. (1545 [1868]). Toxophilus. Arber's English Reprints 7. London: A. Murray & Son.Google Scholar
Ashfield, A. & Bolla, P. (eds.). (1996). The Sublime: a Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attridge, D. (1974). Well-weighed Syllables: Elizabethan Verse in Classical Metres.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1965). Literary Language and its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages (trans. Manheim, R.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Austin, F. O. (1984). Double negation and the eighteenth century. In Blake, N. F.. & Jones, C. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development.Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield ,138–48.Google Scholar
Austin, F. O. (1985). Relative which in late eighteenth-century usage: the Clift family correspondence. In Eaton, et al. (1985) ,15–29.Google Scholar
Auwera, J. (1984). More on the history of subject contact clauses in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 5: 171–84.Google Scholar
Axon, W. E. A. (1883). English Dialect Words of the Eighteenth Century as Shown in the Universal Etymological Dictionary of Nathaniel Bailey. E.D.S., Series B. Reprinted Glossaries.Google Scholar
B[urrow], J. (1768). A Few Thoughts upon Pointing. [London]: Worrall & ToveyGoogle Scholar
B[urrow], J. (1771). De usu et ratione interpungendi.London: Worrall & Tovey.Google Scholar
Baghdikian, S. (1979). Ne in Middle English and Early Modern English. English Studies 60: 673–9. (1982). A functional perspective of the system of negation in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 3: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C-J. & Maroldt, K. (1977). The French lineage of English. In Meisel, (1977), 25–51Google Scholar
Bailey, N. (1727). Universal Etymological Dictionary, vol. II. London.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. W. & Burton, D. M. (1968). English Stylistics: A Bibliography.Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. W., Downer, J. W., Robinson, J. L. & Lehman, P. V. (1975). Michigan Early Modern English Materials. Ann Arbor, MI: Xerox University Microfilms & The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. W. (ed.). (1978). Early Modern English: Additions and Antedatings to the Record of English Vocabulary 1475–1700. Hildesheim & New York: Olms.Google Scholar
Baker, R. (1770). Reflections on the English Language. London: for J. Bell [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 87, 1968]Google Scholar
Baker, W. (1724). Rules for True Spelling and Writing English. 2nd edn. Bristol: the Author.Google Scholar
Bald, M. A. (1926). ‘The anglicization of Scottish printing’. Scottish Historical Review 23: 107–15.Google Scholar
Bald, W. (1984). Form and functions of ONE: diachronic aspects. In Bald, W. & Weinstock, H. (eds.). Medieval Studies Conference in Aachen 1983. Language and Literature.Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang ,143–55.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. (1944). William Shakspere's Small Latine and Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Bambas, R. C. (1947). Verb forms in -s and -th in Early Modern English. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 46: 183–7.Google Scholar
Barber, C. L. (1976). Early Modern English.London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Barber, C. L. (1981). ‘You’ and ‘Thou’ in Shakespeare's Richard III. Leeds Studies in English, ns 12: 273–89. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987).Google Scholar
Barber, C. (1976). Early Moder n English.London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Baret, J. (1580 [1573–1574]). An Alvearie. 2nd edn. [London: Denham]Google Scholar
Barrell, J. (1988). Poetry, Language and Politics.Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, A. (1990). The Names of Comedy.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Basset = Basset, M. (1976). Translation of More's De Tristitia. In Miller, C. H. (ed.).Google Scholar
Batchelor, T. (1809). An Orthoepical Analysis of the English Language. London: Didier & Tebett. ed. Zettersten, A. 1974, A Critical Facsimile Edition of Thomas Batchelor: ‘an Orthoepical Analysis of the English Language’ and An Orthoepical Analysis of the Dialect of Bedfordshire, (1809. Lund Studies in English, 45.Google Scholar
Bately, J. M. (1964). Dryden's revisions in the Essay of Dramatic Poesy: the preposition at the end of the sentence and the expression of the relative. Review of English Studies ns 15: 268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bately, J. M. (1965). Who and which and the grammarians of the seventeenth century. English Studies 46: 145–50.Google Scholar
Bately, J. M. (1967). ‘Ray, Worlidge, and Kersey's revision of The New World of English Words’. Anglia 85: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bately, J. (1964). Dryden's revisions in the Essay of Dramatic Poesy: the preposition at the end of the sentence and the expression of the relative. Review of English Studies 15 (59): 268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, F. W. (1934). English Poetry and the English Language.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1983). English Word-Formation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L. (1988). Introducing Linguistic Morpholog y. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1989). Vocabulary change in English. (Review of Cannon 1987.) American Speech 64: 252–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, A. C. (1951). A History of the English Language. 2nd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Baugh, A. C. and Cable, T.. 3(1978). A History of the English Language. Boston: Routledge. (41993)Google Scholar
Baxandall, M. (1971). Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition, 1350–1450.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beilin, E. V. (1987). Redeeming Eve: Women Writers of the English Renaissance.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bellot, J. (1580). Le maistre d'escole anglois, contenant plusieurs profitables preceptes pour les naturelz francois, et autres estrangers qui ont la langue francoise pour paruenir a la vraye prononciation de la language angloise. London: Thomas Purfotoote.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. R. (1986). A Bibliography of Stylistics and Related Criticism, 1967–83.New York: Modern Languages Association of America.Google Scholar
Bennett, P. A. (1980). English passives: a study in syntactic change and relational grammar. Lingua 51: 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergeder, F. (1914). Die periphrastische Form des englischen Verbums im 17. Jahrhundert.Halle/Saale: Kaemmerer.Google Scholar
Berners, Froissart=Bourchier, J. (Lord Berners). (1523–1525 [1901–1903]). The Chronicle of Froissart (1523–1525). Ker, W. P. (ed.). (1901–1903). Tudor Translations.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. & Langendoen, D. T. (1972). The interaction of speech perception and grammatical structure in the evolution of language. In Stockwell, R. P. & Macaulay, R. K. S. (eds.). Linguistic Change and Generative Theory.Essays from the University of California, Los Angeles, conference on Historical Linguistics in the Perspective of Transformational Theory, February 1969. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press ,32–95.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (1992). The linguistic evolution of five written and speech- based English genres from the seventeenth to the 20th centuries. In Rissanen, et al. (1992) ,688–704.Google Scholar
Biese, Y. M. (1941). Origin and Development of Conversions in English (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae B 45). Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Binns, J. W. (1990). Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England.Leeds: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Björling, A. (1925). The propword one in Early Modern English. Anglia Beiblatt 36: 76–8.Google Scholar
Björling, A. (1926). Studies in the Grammar of the Early Printed English Bible Versions.Lund: Gleerupska Univ.-bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Bladin, V. (1911). Studies on Denominative Verbs in English. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Blair, H. [1783]. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. 8th American edn. New York: Collins & Co, 1819. Facsimile edn, with introduction by Downey, C., Delmar, New York: Scholars Facsimiles and Reprints, 1993.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1965). English versions of ‘Reynard the Fox’ in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Studies in Philology 62 ,63–77.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1968). Caxton and courtly style. Essays and Studies 21: 29–45.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1973). Caxton's own Prose. London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1976). The text and its presentation. In his Caxton: England's First Publisher. London: Osprey, ch. 6.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1981). Non-standard Language in English Literature. (The Language Library). London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1983). Shakespeare's Language: an Introduction.London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1992). Translation and the history of English. In Rissanen, et al. (1992). ,3–24.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. & Jones, C. (eds.). (1984). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development.Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Bliss, A. (1979). Spoken English in Ireland. Representative Texts Assembled and Analysed. Dublin: Dolmen Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, M. W. (1963). A grammatical approach to personification allegory. Modern Philology 60: 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blount, T. (1656). Glossographia.London: Newcomb. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 153, 1969]Google Scholar
Blount, T. (1656). Glossographia. London: T Newcomb for H. Moseley.Google Scholar
Blum, J. (1601). The Booke of Five Collumnes of Architecture. Trans. I.T London.Google Scholar
Bock, H. (1931). Studien zum präpositionalen Infinitiv und Akkusativ mit dem TO-Infinitiv. Anglia 55: 114–247.Google Scholar
Boedtker, A. T. (1911). Critical Contributions to Early English Syntax. 2nd series. Christiania: Videnskabsselskabet i Christiania.Google Scholar
Bøgholm, N. (1906). Bacon og Shakespeare. En sproglig sammenligningCopenhagen: Martius Truelsen.Google Scholar
Bolgar, R. R. (1954). The Classical Heritage and its Beneficiaries.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolingbroke = Bolingbroke, H. (1717 [1754]). The Works of the Right Honourable Henry St John, Lord Viscount Bolingbroke. Mallet, D. (ed.). (1754). London.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1946). Visual morphemes. Language 22: 333–40.CrossRef
Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and Form.London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolton, W. F. (ed.). (1966). The English Language. Essays by English and American Men of Letters, I, 1490–1839. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, W. F. (ed.). (1966). The English Language: Essays by English and American Men of Letters 1490–1839.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, D. F. (ed.). (1965). The Spectator. 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bond, D. F. (ed.). (1987). The Tatler. 3 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradford, R. (1992). Silence and Sound: Theories of Poetics from the Eighteenth Century.London & Toronto: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
Bradford, R. (1993). A Linguistic History of English Poetry.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Breejen, B. (1937). The Genitive and its of-Equivalent in the latter half of the Eighteenth Century.Amsterdam: H.J. Paris.Google Scholar
Breivik, A. Hille (1994). On the progression of the progressive in early Modern English. ICAME Journal 18: 5–25.Google Scholar
Breivik, L. E. (1983). Existential There: a Synchronic and Diachronic Study. Studia Anglistica Norvegica 2. University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Brengelman, F. H. (1980). Orthoepists, printers and the rationalisation of English spelling. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 79: 332–54.
Brengelman, F. H. (1981). Dialectology in seventeenth-century dictionaries. Papers of the Dictionary Society of North America ,1–8.Google Scholar
Brightland, J. & Gildon, C.. (1711). A Grammar of the English Tongue.London: Brightland. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Brightman, F. E. (ed.). (1921). The English Rite, Beinga Synopsis of the Sources and Revisions of‘The Book of Common Prayer’: 2 vols. 2nd rev. edn. London: Rivingtons.Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. (1988). The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post-verbal Particles. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, L. (1996). Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, D. (ed.). (1996). English Historical Linguistics 1994. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook, G. L. (1976). The Language of Shakespeare.London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Brook, S. (1965). The Language of the Book of Common Prayer.London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Brooksbank, J. (1654). Two Books more Exact and Judicious for the Entring Children to Spell.London: the Author.Google Scholar
Brown, G. & Yule, G.. (1983). Discourse Analysis.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, (1960) ,253–76.Google Scholar
Bruck, A., Fox, R. A. & Galy, M. W. (eds.). (1974). Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, 18 April, 1974. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Brunner, K. (1960–1962). Die englische Sprache: ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung, I–II. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brutiaux, P. (1995). The rise and fall of the semi-colon. Applied Linguistics 16.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. (1762). The British Grammar.London: A. Millar. Facsimile edn., Menston: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Bullokar, J. (1616). An English Expositor. London: J. Legatt for A. Crooke.Google Scholar
Bullokar, W. (1580). Booke at Large for the Amendement of Orthography for English Speech. London: H. Denham; reprinted Leeds University (1970).Google Scholar
Bullokar, W. (1586 [1980]). The Works of William Bullokar II Pamphlet for Grammar 1586. Turner, J. R. (ed.). The University of Leeds, School of English.Google Scholar
Bullokar, W. (1586). Pamphlet for Grammar. London: Edward Bollifant.Google Scholar
Bullokar, W. (1966 [1580a]). A Short Introduction or Guiding. (Leeds Texts and Monographs, ns1). Danielsson, B. & Alston, R. C. (eds.). The Works of William Bullokar I.Leeds: the University.Google Scholar
Bullokar, W. (1970 [1580b]). Booke at Large. (Leeds Texts and Monographs ns1). Turner, J. R. (ed.) The Works of William Bullokar III. Leeds: the University.Google Scholar
Bunyan = Bunyan, J. (1666, 1678). Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners and The Pilgrim's Progress from this World to that which is to come. Sharrock, R. (ed.). (1966). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. (1987). The bare infinitive in The Winter's Tale. In Fabian, B. & Rosador, K. T. v. (eds.). Shakespeare, Text, Language, Criticism: Essays in Honour of Marvin Spevack.Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann ,34–56.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. (1990). A profile of the grammar of three sixteenth-century lives of Sir Thomas More and of an unrelated ‘drab’ prose work by Anthony Gilby. In Chaney, E. & Mack, P. (eds.). England and the Continental Renaissance: Essays in Honour of J. B. Trapp.Woodbridge: The Boydell Press ,109–24.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. (ed.). (1994). The Cambridge History of the English Language. V: English in Britain and Overseas. Origins and Development. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E. (1759). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. 2nd edn. London: R. & J. Dodsley. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Burke, P. (1993). The Art of Conversation.Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Burnley, D. (1992). Lexis and semantics. In Blake, N. F. (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Language, II. Cambridge University Press ,409–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnley, J. D. (1983). A Guide to Chaucer's Language.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Burnley, J. D. (1986). Curial prose in England. Speculum 61: 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnley, J. D. (1992). The History of the English Language: a Sourcebook.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Burton = Burton, R. (1621 [1660]). The Anatomie of Melancholy. 7th edn. London: Cripps.Google Scholar
Butler, C. (1633). The English Grammar.Oxford: the Author.Google Scholar
Butler, C. (1634 [1910]). Charles Butler's English Grammar (1634). Eichler, A. (ed.). Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bysshe, E. (1702). The Art of English Poetry. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 75, 1968]Google Scholar
Bysshe, E. (1702). The Art of English Poetry.London: Knaplock, Castle & Tooke. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Cable, T. (1991). The English Alliterative Tradition.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairncross, A. (1972). Compositors E & F of the Shakespeare First Folio. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 66: 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caius, J. (1968 [1574]). De pronunciatione graecae et latinae linguae. Gabel, J. B. (ed. & tr.) (Leeds Texts and Monographs, ns2). Leeds: the University.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (1776). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. 2 vols. London: T Cadell, Edinburgh: W Creech.Google Scholar
Cannon, G. (1986). Blends in English word-formation. Linguistics 24: 257–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, G. (1987). Historical Change and English Word-Formation; Recent Vocabulary (American University Studies, Ser. IV, English Language and Literature 46). New York & Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Capp, B. (1985). Popular literature. In Reay, B. (ed.). Popular Culture in Seventeenth-Century England.London: Croom Helm ,198–243.Google Scholar
Care, H. (1687). The Tutor to True English.London: Larkin. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 287, 1971]Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (1841). On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History.London: James Fraser.Google Scholar
Carter, H. (1975). A History of the Oxford University Press. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (1987). Vocabulary.London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Casa, G. della (1576). Galateo, or Rather, A Treatise of the Manners and Behaviours, it Behoveth a Man to Use and Eschewe, in his Familiar Conversation. Trans. Peterson, R.. London: R. Newbery [EE 120,1969].Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1974). Natural sound changes: some questions of directionality in diachronic phonetics. In Bruck, et al (1974) ,21–9.Google Scholar
Cave, T. (1979). The Corncucopian Text.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cawdrey, R. (1604). A Table Alphabeticall, Conteyning and Teaching the True Writing, and Vnderstanding of Hard Vsuall English Wordes.London: Weauer.Google Scholar
Cawdrey, R. (1604). A Table Aphabeticall. London: I. R. for E. Weaver. [EE 226, 1970]Google Scholar
Caxton, Aesop=The Fables of Aesop. (1484 [1889]). Jacobs, J. (ed.). London: David Nutt.Google Scholar
Cercignani, F. (1981). Shakespeare's Works and Elizabethan Pronunciation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, = The Letters of John Chamberlain. McClure, N. E. (ed.). (1939). The American Philosophical Society: Memoirs 12: 1. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. (1939). The Letters of John Chamberlain (Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society 12: 1). McClure, N. E. (ed.). Philadelphia: The Lancaster Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Bussy DAmbois=Chapman, G.. (1964). Bussy DAmbois. Brooke, N. (ed.). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cheke, J. (1843 [1549]). Letter to Peter Osborne. In Ellis, H. (ed.). Original Letters of Eminent Literary Men.London: Camden Society.Google Scholar
Chen, M. (1972). The time dimension: contribution toward a theory of sound change. Foundations of Language 8: 457–98.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1970). Reading, writing, and phonology. Harvard Educational Review 40: 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Christophersen, P. (1939). The Articles: a Study of their Theory and Use in English.Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Clark, D. L. (1948). John Milton at St Paul's School: A Study of Ancient Rhetoric in English Renaissance Education.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clement, F. (1587). The Petie Schole. London: Vautrollier. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 2, 1967]Google Scholar
Cobbett, W. (1817). A Grammar of the English Language. London (2nd edn. 1833).Google Scholar
Cockeram, H. (1623). The English Dictionarie.London: Butter. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 124, 1968]Google Scholar
Cohen, M. (1977). Sensible Words: Linguistic Practice in England 1640–1785. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. (1964). The Art of Discrimination, Thomson's ‘The Seasons' and the Language of Criticism.Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coles, E. (1674). The Compleat English Schoolmaster.London: Parker. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 26, 1967]Google Scholar
Coles, E. (1676). An English Dictionary. London: S. Crouch.Google Scholar
Coles, E. (1676). English Dictionary. London: S. Crouch. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 268, 1971]Google Scholar
Colie, R. (1966). Paradoxia Epidemica: the Renaissance Tradition of Paradox.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, A. S. (1972). ‘Language 1660–1784’. In Ford, B. (ed.). The Pelican Guide to English Literature 4: From Dryden to Johnson. Harmondsworth: Penguin ,125–41.Google Scholar
Colman, J. (1995). The chronology of French and Latin loan words in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 93 (2): 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congreve, Way of the World=W. Congreve (1700). The Complete Plays of William Congreve. Davis, H. (ed.). (1967). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. (1685). Grammatica linguae anglicanae.London: Tooke.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. (1687). The English Teacher. London: the author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 175, 1969]Google Scholar
Cooper, C. (1687). The English Teacher. London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 175, 1969]. Sundby, B. (ed.). (1953). Christopher Cooper's English Teacher (1687). Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Coote, C. (1788). Elements of the Grammar of the English Language. London: Printed for the author.Google Scholar
Coote, E. (1596). The English Schoole-Maister. London: Jackson & Dexter. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 98, 1968]Google Scholar
Corns, T. N. (1990). Milton's Language.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cotgrave, R. (1611). A Dictionarie of the French and English Tongues. London: A. Islip. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 82, 1968]Google Scholar
Coverdale, Ecclus=Coverdale, M. (1537 [1535]). The Bible. Southwark.Google Scholar
Craigie, W. A. (1937). ‘Northern words in Modern English’. S. P. E. Tract 50. Oxford: Clarendon Press ,79–107.Google Scholar
Craigie, W. A. (1945). ‘Pure English of the soil’. S. P. E. Tract 64. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Craigie, W. A. (1946). ‘The critique of pure English from Caxton to Smollett’. S. P. E. Tract 65. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Cram, D. (1989). Seventeenth-century punctuation theory: Butler's philosophical analysis and Wilkins' philosophical critique. Folia Linguistica Historica 8: 309–49.Google Scholar
Cranmer, T. (1939 [1544]). Hunt, J. E. (ed.). Cranmer's First Litany 1544.London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge; New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Creaser, J. (1983–1984). Editorial problems in Milton. Review of English Studies ns 34: 279–303. ns 35: 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croll, M. W. (1966). Style, Rhetoric and Rhythm. ed. Patrick, J. M. et al. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotch, W. J. B. (ed.) (1928). The Prologues and Epilogues of William Caxton. (Early English Text Society 176.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. (1996). Language in History.London & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. & Davy, D.. (1969). Investigating English Style. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Clapham, P.. (1996). The borrowing of Classical and Romantic words into English: a study based on the electronicOxford English Dictionary. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 1(2): 95–124.Google Scholar
Curme, G. O. (1912). A history of the English relative constructions. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 11: 10–29, 180–204, 355–80.Google Scholar
Curme, G. O. (1931). Syntax. A Grammar ofthe English Language III. Boston, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Cusack, B. (1970). Shakespeare and the tune of the time. Shakespeare Survey 23:1–12. Reprinted in Salmon, & Burness, (1987).Google Scholar
Dahl, T. (1951). Linguistic Studies in some Elizabethan Writings I: an Inquiry into Aspects of the Language of Thomas Deloney.Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Dahl, T. (1956). Linguistic Studies in some Elizabethan Writings II: The Auxiliary ‘do'.Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Daines, S. (1640). Orthoepia anglicana.London: The Company of Stationers. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 31, 1967]Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (1992). The status of word-formation in Middle English: approaching the question. In Rissanen, et al. (1992) ,465–82.Google Scholar
Danchev, A. & Kytö, M. (1994). The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, (1994) ,59–77.Google Scholar
Danielsson, B. (1948). Studies on the Accentuation of Polysyllabic Greek, Latin and Romance words in English. Stockholm Studies in English.Google Scholar
Danielsson, B. (1963). John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation. Part II: Phonology. Stockholm Studies in English, 11. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Danielsson, B. (ed.) (1955). John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Danielsson, B. (ed.). (1955). John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation. Part I: Biographical and Bibliographical Introductions. Texts and Index Verborum. Stockholm Studies in English, 5. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Darby, H. C. (ed.) (1973). A New Historical Geography of England. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, M. & Nielsen, H. F. (eds.). (1983). Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Davie, D. (1952). Purity of Diction in English Verse.London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Davie, D. (1963). The Language of Science and the Language of Literature 1700–1740.London & New York: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Davies, H. S. (1952). Sir John Cheke and the translation of the Bible. Essays and Studies 5: 1–12.Google Scholar
Davies, H. S. (1970). Milton and the vocabulary of verse and prose. In Watson, , (1970) ,175–93.Google Scholar
Davis, N. (1955). The language of the Pastons. Publications of the British Academy 40: 119–44.Google Scholar
Davis, N. (1959). Scribal variation in late fifteenth-century English. In Mélanges de linguistique et de philologie: Fernand Mossé in memoriam. Paris: Didier ,95–103.Google Scholar
Davis, N. (1971). William Tyndale's English of Controversy.London: University College LondonGoogle Scholar
Davis, N. (ed.). (1971). Paston Letters and Papers, I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dawks, T. (1685). The Compleat English-man.London: Dawks & Passenger.Google Scholar
Day, A. (1599). The English Secretary or Methods of Writing Epistles and Letters with a Declaration of such Tropes, Figures and Schemes, as either usually or for ornament sake are therin required.London: printed by P.S. for C. Burbie. Facsimile reprint with an introduction by Evans, R. O., (Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints) Gainesville, Florida, 1967.Google Scholar
Defoe, Plague year=Defoe, D. (1722). A Journal of the Plague Year. London: E. Nutt.Google Scholar
Defoe, Robinson Crusoe = Defoe, D. (1719). The Life and Strange Surprising Adventures of Robinson Crusoe. London: W. Taylor.
Defoe, Roxana =D., Defoe (1724). Roxana, the Fortunate Mistress. Jack, J. (ed.). (1964). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Defoe, D. (1890 [1729]). The Compleat English Gentleman.Bülbring, K. D. (ed.). London: Nutt.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, X. & Pauwels, L. (1989). The demise of the Old English heritage and lexical innovation in Middle English: two intertwined developments. Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 15: 1–20.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, X. (1984). Relativizers in Early Modern English: a dynamic quantitative study. In Fisiak, (1984) ,61–87.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, X. (1986). English contact clauses revisited: a diachronic approach. Folia Linguistica Historica 7: 107–20.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, X. (1988). Socio-historical aspects of relativization in late sixteenth century English: c. 1550–1600. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 21: 25–39.Google Scholar
Dekker, Gull's Hornbook = Dekker, T.. (1609 [1969]). The Gull's Hornbook. McKerrow, R. B. (ed.). (1969). Menston: Scolar PressGoogle Scholar
Dekker, Shoemaker's Holiday=Dekker, T. (1600). The Shoemaker's Holiday in The Dramatic Works of Thomas Dekker. Bowers, F. (ed.). (1962). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Denison, D. (1985a). Why Old English had no prepositional passive. English Studies 66: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, D. (1985b). The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered. In Eaton, et al. (1985) ,45–60.Google Scholar
Denison, D. (1985c). Some observations on ‘being teaching’. Studia Neophilologica 57/2 ,157–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, D. (1990). The Old English impersonal revived. In Adamson, et al. (1990) ,111–40.Google Scholar
Denison, D. (1993a). English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Denison, D. (1993b). Some recent changes in the English verb. In Gotti, (1993) ,15–33.Google Scholar
Deutschbein, M. (1917). System der neuenglischen Syntax.Cöthen: Otto Schulze.Google Scholar
Devitt, A. J. (1989). Standardizing Written English. Diffusion in the Case of Scotland 1520–1659. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diensberg, B. (1985). Untersuchungen zur phonologischen Rezeption romanischen Lehnguts im Mittel- und Frühneuenglischen (Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 268). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Dillon, G. L. (1976). Language Processing and the Reading of Literature.Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, G. L. (1977). Kames and Kiparsky on syntactic boundaries. Language and Style 10: 16–22.Google Scholar
Dilworth, T. (1751 [1740]). A New Guide to the English Tongue.London: Kent. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 4, 1967]Google Scholar
Dirckx, J. H. (1983). The Language of Medicine; its Evolution, Structure, and Dynamics. 2nd edn. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. (1968). English Pronunciation, 1500–1700. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. (1969 [1955]). “Early Modern Standard English”. In Lass, R. (ed.). Approaches to English Historical Linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Donker, M. & Muldrow, G. M.. (1982). Dictionary of Literary-Rhetorical Conventions of the English Renaissance.Westport & London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Donne = Donne, J. (a1631). The Sermons of John DonnePotter, G. R. & Simpson, E. M. (eds.). (1953–1962). Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Downie, J. A. (1986). Defoe's Shortest Way with Dissenters: irony, intention and reader-response. Prose Studies 9 (2): 120–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draat, P. F. (1903). The loss of the prefix ge- in the modern English verb and some of its consequences, II: the conjunction since. Englische Studien 32: 371–428.Google Scholar
Draat, P. F. (1910). The adverb since. Anglia 33: 145–71.Google Scholar
Draat, P. F. (1912a). The preposition since. Anglia 35: 155–64.Google Scholar
Draat, P. F. (1912b). The omission of the nominative relative. Anglia 36: 493–506.Google Scholar
Draat, P. F. (1915). The man which. Anglia 39: 268–9.Google Scholar
Draat, P. F. (1919). The relative that. Neophilologus 4: 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. E. & Lahirí, A. (1991). The Germanic foot: metrical coherence in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 251–86.Google Scholar
Dryden, Plays=Dryden, J. (1669–1694). The Dramatic Works. 6 vols. Summers, M. (ed.). (1968). New York: Gordian Press.Google Scholar
Dryden, Poems = Dryden, J. (1649–1700). The Poems of John Dryden. 4 vols. Kinsley, J. (ed.). (1958). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Duncan-Rose, C. & Vennemann, T. (eds.). (1988). On Language. Rhetorica, Phonologica, Syntactica: a Festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his Friends and Colleagues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dyche, T. (1710). A Guide to the English Tongue. London: Butler. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 92, 1968]Google Scholar
Dyche, T. (1723). A Dictionary of all the Words Commonly Us'd in the English Tongue.London: S. & T. Butler.Google Scholar
Dyche, T. (1725). The Spelling Dictionary.London: Norris & Ware.Google Scholar
Eaton, R., Fischer, O., Koopman, W. & Leek, F. (eds.). (1985). Papers from the fourth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, E. (1910). Die Dialekt- und Ausländertypen des älteren englischen Dramas. Teil I: Die Dialekttypen. Louvain: A. Uystpruyst.Google Scholar
Einenkel, E. (1912). Der Ursprung der Fügung a good one. Anglia 36: 539–44.Google Scholar
Einenkel, E. (1903–1904). Das englische Indefinitum. Anglia 26: 461–72; 27: 1–204.Google Scholar
Einenkel, E. (1914). Nochmals zur Fügung a good one. Anglia 38: 193–212.Google Scholar
Einenkel, E. (1916). Geschichte der englischen Sprache, II: Historische Syntax. 3rd edn. Strasbourg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1965). Historische neuenglische Laut- und Formenlehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ellegård, A. (1953). The Auxiliary ‘do’: the Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ellinger, J. (1983). Substantivsätze mit oder ohne that in der neueren englischen Literatur. Anglia 57: 78–109.Google Scholar
Ellis, = Ellis, H. Sir (1824–1846). Original Letters Illustrative of English History; including numerous Royal Letters I–III. London: Richard BentleyGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. J. (1869). On Early English Pronunciation, with Especial Reference to Shakspere and Chaucer. Part I. On the Pronunciation of the XIVth, XVIth, XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries. London: Asher.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. J. (1874). On Early English Pronunciation, with Especial Reference to Shakespere and Chaucer. Part III. On the Pronunciation of the XIVth and XVIth centuries. Chaucer, Gower, Wycliffe, Spenser, Shakespere, Salesbury, Barcley, Hart, Bullokar, Gill. Pronouncing Dictionary. London: Asher.Google Scholar
Elmer, W. (1981). Diachronic Grammar: the Histor y of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions.Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elphinston, T. (1765). The Principles of the English Language Digested.Google Scholar
Elsness, J. (1989). The English present perfect: has it seen its best days? In Breivik, L. E., Hille, A. & Johansson, S. (eds.). Essays on English Language.Oslo: Novus ,95–106.Google Scholar
Elyot, [Scolar Press] = Elyot, T. (1531 [1970]). The Boke Named The Governor, 1531. Menston: The Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Elyot, T. (1531). The Boke Named the Gouernour. London: T. Berthelet. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 246, 1970]Google Scholar
Elyot, T. (1533). Of the Knowledg whiche Maketh a Wise Man. London: T. Berthelet.Google Scholar
Emma, R. D. (1964). Milton's Grammar.London, The Hague, Paris: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Engblom, V. (1938). On the Origin and Early Development of the Auxiliary ‘do'.Lund: G. V. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Erdmann, P. (1980). On the history of subject contact clauses in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 1: 139–70.Google Scholar
Evans, M. (1950–1951). Elizabethan spoken English. Cambridge Journal 4: 401–14.Google Scholar
Fabb, N. (1997). Linguistics and Literature.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fanego, T. (1990). Finite complement clauses in Shakespeare's English I–II. Studia Neophilologica 62: 3–21; 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, T. (1991). On the origin and history of the English syntactic type (and) none but he to marry with Nan Page. English Studies 72: 513–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, T. (1992). Infinitive complements in Shakespeare's English.Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago.Google Scholar
Farnham, W. E. (1916). Colloquial contractions in Beaumont, Fletcher, Massinger and Shakespeare as a test of authorship. PMLA 31: 326–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, A Constant Couple = Farquhar, G. (1701). In Stonehill, C. (ed.). (1967). The Complete Works of George Farquhar 1. New York: Gordian.Google Scholar
Fenning, D. (1756). The Universal Spelling-book.London: Crowden, Woodgate & Collins.Google Scholar
Fenton, A. & MacDonald, D. A. (eds.). (1994). Studies in Scots and Gaelic. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Languages of Scotland. Edinburgh: Canongate Academic.Google Scholar
Fernández, F., Fuster, M. & Calvo, J. J. (1994). English Historical Linguistics 1992.Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, Jonathan Wild= Fielding, H. (1743). Jonathan Wild. (1932). Everyman edition. London: Dent.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, Tom Jones =Fielding, H. (1749). The History of Tom Jones. Mutter, R. P. C. (ed.). (1984). London: Penguin English Library.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, T. & Wolff, D. (1973). Ordered Profusion: Studies in Dictionaries and the English Lexicon (Annales Universitatis Saraviensis 13). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, T. (1963). You and Thou. Studien zur Anrede im Englishchen. Berlin: E. Schmidt.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, T., Leisi, E. & Wolff, D. (1970). A Chronological English Dictionary. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. & Leek, F. C. (1981). Optional vs. radical re-analysis: mechanisms of syntactic change. Lingua 55: 301–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. (1983). The demise of the Old English impersonal construction. Journal of Linguistics 19: 337–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. (1987). A ‘Case’ for the Old English impersonal. In Koopman, W., Leek, F., Fischer, O. & Eaton, R. (eds.). Explanation and Linguistic Change.Amsterdam: John Benjamins ,79–120.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. (1988). The rise of the for noun phrase to V construction: an explanation. In Nixon, G. & Honey, J. (eds.). An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang.London and New York: Routledge ,67–88.Google Scholar
Fish, S. E. (ed.). (1971). Seventeenth-Century Prose.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. H. (1977). Chancery and the emergence of standard written English in the fifteenth century. Speculum 52: 870–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. H. (1979). Chancery standard and modern written English. Journal of the Society of Archivists 6: 136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1980). Was there a kl-, gl- > tl-, dl- change in Early Modern EnglishLingua Posnaniensia 23: 87–90.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1985). Historical Semantics, Historical Word-Formation.Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1995). Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. (ed.). (1984). Historical Syntax.Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. (ed.). (1985). Historical Semantics and Historical Word-Formation (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 29). Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitz-Adam, A. [Stanhope, Philip, 4th Earl of Chesterfield] (1754). The World, no. 101 (5 December). London: Cooper.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, R. P. (1966). The style of Ossian. Studies in Romanticism 6: 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzherbert, J. (1534 [1523]). The Book of Husbandry. Skeat, W. W. (ed.). (1882). London: Trübner & Co. for the English Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Flint, M. (1740). Prononciation de la langue Angloise. Paris. In Kökeritz, H. (1944). Mather Flint on early Eighteenth-Century English Pronunciation. Skrifta Utgivna af Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskapsamfundet i Uppsala, 37.Google Scholar
Förster, D. & , M. (1901). Dialekt-materialien aus dem 18. Jahrhundert – III. Dialektwörter bei Kersey (1708). Anglia 24: N.F. 12, 118–32.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. (1975). Conceitful Thought: the Interpretation of English Renaissance Poems.Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. (1982). Kinds of Literature.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (1986). Reinterpreting English humanism. In Fox, A. & Guy, J. (eds.). Reassessing the Henrician Age: Humanism, Politics and Reform 1500–1550.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fox, B. (1993). Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, G. and Hooke, E. (1673). Instructions for Right Spelling. [London]. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 303, 1971]Google Scholar
Frank, T. (1985). The rise of do-support in early Modern English: a reappraisal. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 10: 1–29.Google Scholar
Franz, W. (1939). Die Sprache Shakespeares in Vers und Prosa. 3rd edn. Halle/Saale: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fraunce, A. (1588). The Arcadian Rhetorike. London: Thomas Orwin [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 176, 1969]Google Scholar
Fraunce, A. (1588). The Arcadian Rhetorique. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. C. (1968). On the primes of metrical style. Language and Style, 1 ,63–101.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. C. (ed.). (1981). Essays in Modern Stylistics.London & New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fridén, G. (1948). Studies on the Tenses of the English Verb from Chaucer to Shakespeare.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Fridén, G. (1957). On the use of auxiliaries to form the perfect and the pluperfect in late Middle English and early Modern English. Studia Linguistica 11: 54–6.Google Scholar
Fridén, G. (1959). On the use of auxiliaries to form the perfect and the pluperfect in late Middle English and early Modern English. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 196: 152–3.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1925). The periphrastic future with shall and will in Modern English. PMLA 40: 963–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1940). American English Grammar.New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Fries, U. (1970). Demonstrativum und bestimmter Artikel. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 69: 209–22.Google Scholar
Fries, U. (1994). Text deixis in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fussell, P. (1954). Theory of Prosody in Eighteenth-Century England. (Connecticut College Monograph 5.) New London: Connecticut College.Google Scholar
, G. A. (1639). Pallas armata, the Gentlemans Armorie. London: I. D. for J. Williams.Google Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1912). The origin of would rather and some of its analogues. Englische Studien 45: 381–96.Google Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1926). A friend of mine. Neophilologus 12: 18–31.Google Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1929). The conversion of the indirect personal object into the subject of a passive construction. English Studies 11: 1–11, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1930a). The passive of a verb accompanied by a preposition. English Studies 12: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1930b). Some notes on the history of the progressive form. Neophilologus 15: 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1932). The absolute genitive. English Studies 14: 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadde, F. (1910). The History and Use of the Suffixes -ery (-ry), -age and -ment in English. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Garner, B. A. (1982). Shakespeare's Latinate neologisms. Shakespeare Studies 15: 149–170. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987) ,207–28.Google Scholar
Garner, B. A. (1983). Latin–Saxon hybrids in Shakespeare and the Bible. Studies in the Humanities 10: 39–44. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987) ,229–34.Google Scholar
Garner, B. A. (1987a). Shakespeare's latinate neologisms. In Salmon, & Burness, (1987) ,207–28.Google Scholar
Garner, B. A. (1987b). Latin–Saxon hybrids in Shakespeare and the Bible. In Salmon, & Burness, (1987) ,229–34.Google Scholar
Gil, A. (1619). Logonomia Anglica.London: John Beale. Facsimile edn. Danielsson, B. & Gabrielson, A. (eds.). (Stockholm Studies in English 26.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1972.Google Scholar
Gil, A. (1787). A Provincial Glossary. London: S. Hooper. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 63, 1968] (2nd edn. 1790)Google Scholar
Gil, A. (1972 [1619]). Logonomia anglica. (Stockholm Studies in English, 26, 27). Danielsson, B., & Gabrielson, A. (eds.), Alston, R. C., (tr.). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Gil, A. 2(1621). Logonomia anglica. London: Joh. Beale (first 1619). [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 68, 1968] Grose, F. (1785). A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue. London: S. Hooper. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 80, 1968]Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. J. (1979). Literary Language from Chaucer to Johnson.London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. (ed.). (1958). The Sermons of John Donne. New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
Glauser, B. (1991). Transition areas versus focal areas in English dialectology. English World-Wide 12: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, = Goldsmith, J. (1766). The Vicar of Wakefield in Friedman, A. (ed.). (1966). Collected Works of Oliver Goldsmith, vol. IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. A. (ed.). (1995). The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodman, G. (1616). The Fall of Man.London: Lee. [British Library Pressmark 4255. bb. 44]Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (1984). The interplay of syntax and semantics in the development of the English modals. In Blake, N. F. & Jones, C. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development.Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield ,149–59.Google Scholar
Gordon, I. A. (1966). The Movement of English Prose.London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Gordon, I. A. (1980 [1966]). The Movement of English Prose. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1978). Einführung ins Frühneuenglischen. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1987). Lexical loss and lexical survival: the case of Scots and English. Scottish Language 6: 1–20. Reprinted in Görlach (1990) ,123–43.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1990a). Studies in the History of the English Language. (Anglistische orschungen 210). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1990b). ‘The development of Standard Englishes’. In Görlach, (1990a) ,9–64.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1990c). ‘Renaissance English’. In Görlach, , (1990a), 95–107 (first edn. 1984).Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1990d). ‘The study of Early Modern English variation – the Cinderella of English historical linguistics?’ In Görlach, (1990a) 108–22 (1st edn. 1988).Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1990e). ‘Lexical loss and lexical survival – the case of Scots and English’. In Görlach, (1990a) 123–43 (1st edn. 1987).Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1991). Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge University Press, ch. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görlach, M. (1991). Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görlach, M. (1995a). New Studies in the History of the English Language. (Anglistische Forschungen 232.) Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1995b). Dialect lexis in Early Modern English dictionaries. In Görlach, (1995a) ,82–127.Google Scholar
Gotti, M. (1992). The development of a scientific language in the seventeenth century. In Avila, Nocera et al. (1992) ,319–43.Google Scholar
Gotti, M. (1996). Robert Boyle and the Language of Science.Milan: Guerini Scientifica.Google Scholar
Gotti, M. (ed.). (1993). English Diachronic Syntax.Bergamo: GueriniGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1983). Hen's Teeth and Horses' Toes. Further Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gr[eaves], P. (1594). Grammatica anglicana.Cambridge: Legatt. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 169, 1969]Google Scholar
Grainger, J. M. (1959). Studies in the Syntax of the King James Version.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Granger, T. (1616). Syntagma grammaticvm. London: T. Dawson.Google Scholar
Gray, = Gray, T. (a1771). The Complete Poems of Thomas Gray, English, Latin and Greek. Starr, H. H. & Hendrickson, J. R. (eds.). (1966). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gray, D. & Stanley, E. G. (eds.). (1983). Middle English Studies presented to Norman Davis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Frier Bacon = Greene, R. (c. 1590). The Honorable Historie of Frier Bacon, and Frier Bongay. Greg, W. W. (ed.). Oxford: Malone Society Reprints.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. (1711). An Essay Towards a Practical English Grammar.London: R. Tookey. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. (1711). Essay towards a Practical English Grammar. London: R. Tookey.Google Scholar
Greer, G. et al. (eds.). (1988). Kissing the Rod: an Anthology of Seventeenth-Century Women's Verse.London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, M. & Carroll, S.. (1978). Language and Situation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Groom, B. (1955). The Diction of Poetry from Spenser to Bridges.University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Gutwinski, W. (1976). Cohesion in Literary Texts: a Study of Some Grammatical and Lexical Features of English Discourse.The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halkett=, (1699). The Autobiography of Anne Lady Halkett.J. Nichols, G. (ed.). (1875). London: Camden Society, ns 13.Google Scholar
Hall, F. (1881). On the origin of had rather go and analogous or apparently analo gous locutions. American Journal of Philology 2: 281–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. & Keyser, S. J. (1971). English Stress: Its Form, Its Growth, and Its Role in Verse.New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1981). The iambic pentameter. In Freeman, (1981): 206–24.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R.. (1976). Cohesion in English.Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., et al. (1964). The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. ch. 4: ‘The users and uses of English’. London: Longman ,75–110.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K. G. (1963). The Two Harmonies: Poetry and Prose in the Seventeenth Century.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hanham, Alison. (ed.). (1975). The Cely Letters, 1472–1488. (EETS 273.) Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardison, O. B. (1989). Prosody and Purpose in the English Renaisssance.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1771). Hermes, or A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Universal Grammar. 3rd edn. London: J. Nourse & P. Vaillan.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1985). Phonological Variation and Change. Studies in Hiberno-English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1994). English Sound Structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, J., Little, D. & Singleton, D. (eds.). (1986). Perspectives on the English Language in Ireland. Proceedings of the First Symposium on Hiberno-English. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.Google Scholar
Harris, John. (1985). Phonological Variation and Change. Studies in HiBerno-English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, John. (1986). ‘Expanding the superstrate: habitual aspect markers in Atlantic Englishes’. English World-Wide 7: 141–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. (1551). The Opening of the Unreasonable Writing of our Inglish Toung. BM Royal MS 17. C. VII. In Danielsson, (1955) ,109–64.Google Scholar
Hart, J. (1569). An Orthographie, conteyning the due Order and Reason, howe to Write or Paint Thimage of Mannes Voice, most like to the Life or Nature. London [no publisher given]. Reprinted in Danielsson (1955): 165–228.Google Scholar
Hart, J. (1569). An Orthographie.London: Seres. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 209, 1969]. Also in Danielsson (1955) ,165–228.Google Scholar
Hart, J. (1569). An Orthographie. London: Seres. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 209, 1969]Google Scholar
Hart, J. (1570). A Methode.London: Henrie Denham. Also in Danielsson (1955) ,29–50.Google Scholar
Hart, J. (1570). A Methode. In Danielsson, B. (ed.). (1955). John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation, Part 1. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,229–50.Google Scholar
Hart, J. (1955 [1551]). The Opening of the Unreasonable writing of our Inglish Toung. (Stockholm Studies in English, 5). In Danielsson (1955). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hart, J. (1963). John Hart's Works on English Orthographie and Pronunciation. In Danielsson 1963. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hart, J. 1570. A Methode or Confortable Beginning for all vnlearned, whereby they may bee taught to read English, in a very short time, vvith pleasure. London: Henrie Denham. Reprinted in Danielsson (1955) ,229–48.Google Scholar
Harvey, = Letter-book of Gabriel Harvey (1573–1980). Long, E.J. (ed.). (1884). London: Camden Society, ns 33.Google Scholar
Hatcher, A. G. (1951). Modern English Word-Formation and Neo-Latin: a Study of the Origins of English (French, Italian, German) Copulative Compounds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Haudry, J. (1973). Parataxe, hypotaxe et corrélation dans la phrase latine. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 68: 47–86.Google Scholar
Haugland, K. (1995). Ist allowed or aint it – on contraction in early grammars and spelling books. Studia Neophilologica 67: 165–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, R. B. (1974). The origin and development of Modern English periphrastic do. In Anderson, J. & Jones, C. (eds.). Historical Linguistics I. Amsterdam: North-Holland ,159–89.Google Scholar
Havens, R. D. (1922). The Influence of Milton on English Poetry.Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Havens, R. D. (1929). Changing tastes in the eighteenth century: a study of Dryden's and Dodsley's Miscellanies. PMLA 44: 510–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, T. (1972). Metaphor.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hazard, P. (1964). The European Mind, 1680–1715.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Head, R. (1673). The Canting Academy. London.Google Scholar
Heilman, L. (ed.). (1975). Proceedings of the eleventh International Congress of Linguists. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Helgerson, R. (1992). Forms of Nationhood: the Elizabethan Writing of England.Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heller, L. G. (1974). Toward a general typology of the pun. Language and Style, 7: 271–82.Google Scholar
Heltveit, T. (1967). Studies in English Demonstrative Pronouns: a Contribution to the History of English Morphology.Oslo: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Heninger, H. K. (1974). Touches of Sweet Harmony: Pythagorean Cosmology and Renaissance Poetics.San Marino: Huntingdon Library.Google Scholar
Heywood, = Heywood, T. (1607). A Woman Kilde with Kindnesse. London: William Iaggard.Google Scholar
Hill, A. (1988). Chaucer and the pun-hunters: some points of caution. In Duncan-Rose, & Vennemann, (1988) ,66–78.Google Scholar
Hill, B. (1983). William Patten: a Tudor Londoner. In White, B. M. (ed.). Essays and Studies ns 36: 14–26.Google Scholar
Hill, C. (1985). Writing and Revolution in Seventeenth-Century England. The Collected Essays of Christopher Hill, vol. I. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, R. (1983a). The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb: the Evidence from some Old and Early Middle English Texts (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Series B 160). Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, R. (1983b). Phrasal verbs in English grammar books before 1800. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 84: 376–86.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, R. (1994). On phrasal verbs in Early Modern English: notes on lexis and style. In Kastovsky, (1994) ,129–40.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H. (1986). Principles in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hodges, R. (1643). A special Help to Orthographie: or, the true-writing of English. London: Cotes. [Extracts in Ellis (1874), 1018–1024.]Google Scholar
Hodges, R. (1644). The English Primrose.London: Cotes. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 183, 1969]Google Scholar
Hodges, R. (1653). Most Plain Directions for True-Writing.London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 118, 1968]Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. (1988). Snuck: the development of irregular preterite forms. In Nixon, & Honey, (1988) ,31–40.Google Scholar
Holder, W. (1669). The Elements of Speech. London: F. Martyn.Google Scholar
Holmberg, B. (1964). On the Concept of Standard English and the History of Modern English Pronunciation. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Honey, J. (1988). ‘Talking proper’: schooling and the establishment of English ‘Received Pronunciation’. In Nixon, G. & Honey, J.. (eds.). An Historic Tongue. London: Routledge ,209–27.Google Scholar
Hoole, C. (1659). The Petty Schoole. London: J. T. for A. Crooke. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 133, 1969]Google Scholar
Hooper, W. (ed.). (1969). Selected Literary Essays by C. S. Lewis.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hope, J. (1994). The use of thou and you in Early Modern spoken English: evidence from depositions in the Durham ecclesiastical court records. In Kastovsky, (1994) ,141–51.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Traugott, E. C.. (1993). Grammaticalization.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation.Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horn, W. (1940). Der Lautwandel von sj zu š i n Neuenglischen. Beiblatt zur Anglia 1: 21–4.Google Scholar
Horn, W. and Lehnert, M.. (1954). Laut und Leben. Englishe Lautgeschichte der neueren Zeit. (1400–1950). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Horn, W. & Lehnert, M. (1954). Laut und Leben. Englische Lautgeschichte der neueren Zeit (1400–1950). 2 vols. Berlin: Deutsche Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Hoskins, J. [?1599] Directions for Speech and Style. Ed. Hudson, H. H.. Princeton University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Houston, A. (1989). The English gerund: syntactic change and discourse function. In Fasold, R. & Schiffrin, D. (eds.). Language Change and Variation.Amsterdam: John Benjamins ,173–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R. (1984). A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howel[l], J. (1645). Epistolæ Ho Elianæ.London: Moseley.Google Scholar
Howel[l], J. (1662). Of Divers Superfluous Letters in the English Orthography. In A New English Grammar […] for Forreners to learn English.London: Williams, Brome & Marsh ,83–9.Google Scholar
Howell, W. S. (1956). Logic and Rhetoric in England 1500–1700.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, W. S. (1971). Eighteenth-century British Logic and Rhetoric.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the Grammar of English.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. (1988). Words in Time. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (1991). Swearing: a Social History of Foul Language, Oaths and Profanity in English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hughey, R. (ed.). (1941). The Correspondence of Lady Katherine Paston, 1603–1627. Norfolk Record Society.Google Scholar
Huizinga, J. (1927). The Waning of the Middle Ages.Google Scholar
Hulbert, J. R. (1947). On the origin of the grammarians' rules for the use of shall and will. PMLA 62: 1178–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huloet, R. (1552). Abecedarium anglico-latinum.London: Riddel. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 208, 1970]Google Scholar
Hume, A. (1925 (1865) [c. 1617]). Of the Orthographie and Congruitie of the Britan Tong.Wheatley, H. B. (ed.). Early English Text Society, old series 5.Google Scholar
Hume, A. (c. 1617). Of the Orthographie and Congruite of the Britan Tong. ed. Wheatley, H. B. (1865), Early English Text Society, old series 5.Google Scholar
Hunt, T. (1661). Libellus orthographicus.London: Hancock & Cossinet. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 94, 1968]Google Scholar
Hussey, S. S. (1992). The Literary Language of Shakespeare. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Ihalainen, O. (1983). On the notion “possible grammatical change”: a look at a perfectly good change that did not quite make it. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 15: 15–75.Google Scholar
Ihalainen, O. (1994). The dialects of England since 1776. In Burchfield, (1994) ,197–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, G. (1988). The origins of the English gerund. Nowele 12: 15–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, S. (1981). Preverbal Adverbs and Auxiliaries: a Study of Word Order Change.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, B. (1951). Inversion in English with Special Reference to the Early English Period.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. (1993). Erasmus, Man of Letters.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1907). John Hart's Pronunciation of English. Anglistische Forschungen 22.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1909–1949). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1909–1949). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1917). Negation in English and other languages. De Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser I: 5. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1942). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. vol. 6. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1946). Growth and Structure of the English Language. 9th edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1949). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johannisson, T. (1958). On the be and have constructions with mutative verbs. Studia Linguistica 12: 106–18.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. (1997). A corpus study of existential clauses: register variation and discourse function. In Nevalainen, & Kahlas-Tarkka, (1997) ,303–18.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. C. (1966). The pronoun of direct address in seventeenth-century English. American Speech 41: 261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. W. (1967). The Formation of English Neo-classical Thought.Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. (1747). The Plan of a Dictionary of the English Language.London: J. & P. Knapton et al. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1747). The Plan of a Dictionary.London: Knapton; Longman & Shewell; Hitch; Millar; Dodsley. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 223, 1970]Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1755 [1979]). A Dictionary of the English Language … and the English Grammar. London: W. Strahern. Reprinted London: Times Books.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1755). A Dictionary of the English Language: in which the Words are deduced from their Originals, and illustrated in their Different Significations by Examples from the Best Writers. 2 vols. London: J. F. & C. Rivington.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1755). A Dictionary of the English Language. London: J. & P. Knapton.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1755). Dictionary of the English Language. London; reprinted London: Times Books (1983); new edition by Todd, H. J., London: Longman et al., (1818); “Preface to A Dictionary of the English Language”. In Bolton, (1966) ,129–56.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1765). Mr Johnson's Preface to his Edition of Shakespear's Plays.London: J. & R. Tonson et al.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1779–1981). The Lives of the English Poets; and a Criticism on their works. 3 vols. Dublin: Messrs Whitestone et al.Google Scholar
Johnston, W. (1764). A Pronouncing and Spelling Dictionary. London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 95, 1968]Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1909). The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, J. (1701). Dr John Jones's Practical Phonography. London: Richard Smith. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 167, 1969]Google Scholar
Jones, J. (1701). Practical phonography.London: Smith. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 167, 1969]Google Scholar
Jones, R. F. (1951). The Seventeenth Century: Essays by Richard Foster Jones and Others Writing in his Honor.Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. F. (1953). The Triumph of the English Language: a Survey of Opinions Concerning the Vernacular from the Introduction of Printing to the Restoration. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jonson, B. (1600). Euery Man out of His Humour. London: W. Holme.Google Scholar
Jonson, B. (1640 [1954]). The English Grammar. In Percy, C. H. H. & Simpson, E. (eds.). Ben Jonson, vol VIII. The Poems. The Prose Works. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jonson, B. (1640). The English Grammar. In Works, London. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 349, 1972]Google Scholar
Jonson, B. (1640). The English Grammar. Made by Ben. Johnson. For the benefit of all Strangers, out of his Observations of the English language now spoken, and in use. In The Workes of Benjamin Ionson, II.31–84. London: Richard Bishop.Google Scholar
Jonson, B. (1925). The English Grammar: Introduction by C. H. Herford & P. Simpson. In The Works,Oxford: Clarendon Press, II ,415–35.Google Scholar
Jonson, B. (1947 [1640]). The English Grammar. In Herford, C. H. & Simpson, P. & E. (eds.). The Works,Oxford: Clarendon Press, VIII, 455–61 (The text); 463–553 (The grammar). [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 349, 1972]Google Scholar
Jonson, B. (1952). The English Grammar; a Commentary by C. H. Herford & P. & E. Simpson. In The Works.Oxford: Clarendon Press, XI ,165–218.Google Scholar
Jonson=Jonson, B. (1598–1633 [1925–1947]). Ben Jonson. 8 vols. Herford, S. H. & Simpson, P. E. (eds.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, Sister M. (1947). Shakespeare's Use of the Arts of Language.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. (1991). Between hypotaxis and parataxis. Clauses of reason in Ancrene Riwle. In Kastovsky, (1991) ,203–20.Google Scholar
Jud-Schmid, E. (1956). Der indefinite Agens von Chaucer bis Shakespeare: die Wörter und Wendungen für ‘man’.Meisenheim/Glan: Hain.Google Scholar
Kakietek, P. (1970). May and might in Shakespeare's English. Linguistics 64 ,26–35.Google Scholar
Kakietek, P. (1972). Modal Verbs in Shakespeare's English.Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar
Kakietek, P. (1976). The perfect auxiliaries in the language of Shakespeare. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 8: 45–53.Google Scholar
Kames, Henry Home, Lord, , [1762]. Elements of Criticism. 2 vols. 6th edn. Edinburgh & London, 1785. Facsimile edn. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1985). Deverbal nouns in Old and Modern English: from stem-for-mation to word-formation? In Fisiak, (1985) ,221–61.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1986a). The problem of productivity in word-formation. Linguistics 24: 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1986b). Problems in the morphological analysis of complex lexical items. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36: 93–107.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1992a). Semantics and Vocabulary. In Hogg, R. (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Language, I. Cambridge University Press ,290–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1992b). The formats change – the problems remain: word-formation theory between 1960 and 1990. In Pütz, M. (ed.). Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins ,285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1994). Studies in Early Modern English.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. & Bauer, G. (eds.). (1988) Luick revisited. Papers read at the Luick-Symposium at Schloβ Liechtenstein, 15.–18.9.1985.Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (ed.) (1991). Historical English Syntax.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (ed.). (1994). Studies in Early Modern English (Topics in English Linguistics 13). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1979a). Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55: 332–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1979b). Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Language 55: 649–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, L. (1887). Zur Sprache Christopher Marlowes.Vienna: Verlag der K. K. Staats-oberrealschule.Google Scholar
Kellner, L. (1892). Historical Outlines of English Syntax.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kemenade, A. (1987). Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English.Dordrecht: Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, A. (1989). Syntactic change and the history of English modals. Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 16.Google Scholar
Kemp, J. A. (1985). Elocution and general phonetic theory: John Herries. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 7: 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, W. (1979). On that that that that became that which which became what. In Clyne, P. F., Hanks, W. R. & Hofbauen, C. L. (eds.). Papers from the Fifteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.Chicago Linguistic Society ,185–96.Google Scholar
Kempe, W. (1588). The Education of Children in Learning.London: Porter & Gubbin.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. G. (1920). The Modern English Verb–Adverb Combination (Stanford University Publications in Language and Literature 1: 1). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenner, H. (1974). Pope's reasonable rhymes. English Literary History 41: 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, W. (1784). A Rhetorical Grammar of the English Language. London: Cadell & Longman. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 332, 1972]Google Scholar
Kerling, J. (1979). Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries: the Old-Word Tradition in English Lexicography down to 1721 and Speght's Chaucer Glossaries. Leiden University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersey, J. (1702). A New English Dictionary. London. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 140, 1969]Google Scholar
Kersey, J. (1708). Dictionarium Anglo-Britannicum. London. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 156, 1969]Google Scholar
Kestowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kibbee, D. A. (1991). For to Speke French Trewely. The French Language in England, 1000–1600: its Status, Description and Instruction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. B. & Rix, H. D.. (1963). Desiderius Erasmus On Copia of Words and Ideas.Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1977). The rhythmic structure of English verse. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 189–24.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1981). Stress, syntax and meter. In Freeman, (1981): 225–72.Google Scholar
Kirkby, J. (1746). A New English Grammar: a Guide to the English Tongue, with Notes. London: Manby & Cox. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 297, 1971]Google Scholar
Kisbye, T. (1971–1972). An Historical Outline of English Syntax, I–II. Aarhus: Akademisk Boghandel.Google Scholar
Klein, L. E. (1994). Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemola, J. & Filppula, M. (1992). Subordinating uses of and in the history of English. In Rissanen, et al. (1992) ,310–18.Google Scholar
Kleparski, G. (1986). Semantic Change and Componential Analysis: an Inquiry into Pejorative Developments in English (Eichstätter Materialen 9). Regensburg: Pustet.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J. (eds.). The Structure of Language.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall ,246–323.Google Scholar
Knapp, S. (1985). Personification and the Sublime: Milton to Coleridge.Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kniezsa, V. (1992). ‘The due order and reason’: on the histories of English spelling. Folia Linguistica Historica 12: 209–18.Google Scholar
Knorrek, M. (1938). Der Einfluβ des Rationalismus auf die englishe Sprache. Breslau: Priebatsch.Google Scholar
Knox, N. (1961). The Word ‘Irony’ and Its Context, 1500–1755. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Koelb, C. (1987). The iambic pentameter revisited. In Salmon, & Burness, (1987): 433–41.Google Scholar
Kohonen, V. (1978). On the development of an awareness of English syntax in early (1550–1660) descriptions of word order by English grammarians, logicians and rhetoricians. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 79: 44–58.Google Scholar
Kökeritz, H. (1938–1939). Gil, Alexander (1621) on the dialects of South and East England. Studia Neophilogica II.
Kökeritz, H. (1945). The reduction of initial kn and gn in English. Language 21: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kökeritz, H. (1953). Shakespeare's Pronunciation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
König, E. (1985). Where do concessives come from? On the development of concessive connectives. In Fisiak, (1985) ,263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopytko, R. (1988). The impersonal use of verbs in Shakespeare's plays. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 21 ,41–56.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, I. (1962). Studies in the Vocabulary of English Drama 1550–1600, excluding Shakespeare and Ben Jonson (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B 84). Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, I. (1968). Repetitive Word Pairs in Old and Early Middle English Prose.Annales Universitatis Turkuensis. Turku.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, I. (1968). Repetitive Word Pairs in Old and Early Middle English Prose (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B 107). Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Koziol, H. (1967). Grundzüge der englischen Semantik (Wiener Beiträge zur englischen Philologie 70). Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Koziol, H. (1972). Handbuch der englischen Wortbildungslehre. 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kroch, A. S. (1989). Function and grammar in the history of English: periphrastic do. In Fasold, R. W. & Schiffrin, D. (eds.). Language Change and Variation.Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins ,133–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A. S. (1990). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuin, R. J. P. (1985). The purloined Letter: evidence and probability regarding Robert Langham's authorship. The Library, 6th series 7: 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, M. & Rissanen, M. (1992). A language in transition: the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. ICAME Journal 16: 7–27.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. & Rissanen, M. (1983). The syntactic study of early American English: the variationist at the mercy of his corpus?Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 84: 470–90.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. & Rissanen, M. (1993). ‘By and By Enters [This] My Artificiall Foole’: searching for syntactic constructions in the Helsinki Corpus. In Rissanen, et al. (1993).Google Scholar
Kytö, M. (1991). Variation and diachrony, with American English in Focus. Studies on CAN/MAY and SHALL/ WILL.Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. (1991). Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus: Studies on CAN/MAY and SHALL/WILL. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. (1994). BE vs. HAVE with intransitives in Early Modern English. In Fernández, F., Fuster, M. & Calvo, J. J. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics 1992.Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins ,179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, M. (1996). Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. 3rd edn. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. (1997). Be/have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransi-tives from Late Middle to Modern English. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.), (1997a) ,17–85.Google Scholar
Kytö, M., compiled (1996). Manual to the Diachronic Part of The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts; Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1975). On the use of the present to explain the past. In Heilman, (ed.) 825–51.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things.University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancashire, I. & Patterson, K.. (1997). Learning from the Early Modern English dictionaries corpus. In Hickey, R., Kytö, M. & Lancashire, I. (eds.), Tracing the Trail of Time: Proceedings from the Second Diachronic Corpora Workshop. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi ,47–61.Google Scholar
Land, S. K. (1974). From Signs to Propositions: the Concept of Form in Eighteenth-Century Semantic Theory.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lane, A. (1700). A Key to the Art of Letters.London: A. & J. Churchil & J. Wild. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Langenfelt, G. (1933). Select Studies in Colloquial English of the Late Middle Ages.Lund: Gleerupska Univ. Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Langenfelt, G. (1946). The roots of the propword one. Studier i modern språkvetenskap utgivna av Nyfilologiska Sällskapet i Stockholm 16: 97–138.Google Scholar
Lanham, R. A. (1991). A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. 2nd edn. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1973). The World We Have Lost. 2nd edn. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). English Phonology and Phonological Theory: Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1983). Velar /r/ and the history of English. In Davenport, M. et al. (1983) ,67–94.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1984). Phonology. An Introduction to Basic Concepts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1987). The Shape of English. Structure and History. London & Melbourne: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1988). Vowel shifts, great and otherwise: remarks on Stockwell and Minkova. In Kastovsky, & Bauer, (1988) ,395–410.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1989). How early does English get modern? Or, what happens if you listen to orthoepists and not to historians? Diachronica VI (1).Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1990). Where do Extraterritorial Englishes come from? Dialect input and recodification in transported Englishes. In Adamson, et al. (1990) ,245–80.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1992a). The Early Modern English vowels noch einmal, again: a reply to Minkova and Stockwell. Diachronica IX (1) ,1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. (1992b). What, if anything, was the Great Vowel Shift? In Rissanen et al.(1992) ,144–55.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1994). Proliferation and option-cutting: the strong verb in the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries. In Stein, & Ostade, Tieken-Boon (1994) ,81–114.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1997). Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, J. (1758). Lectures Concerning Oratory.Dublin: George Faulkner. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Lawton, G. (1962). John Wesley's English. A Study of his Literary Style. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. & Short, M. H.. (1981). Style in Fiction.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1966). Linguistics and the figures of rhetoric. In Fowler, R. (ed.). Essays on Style and Language.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ,135–156.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.). (1968). Directions for Historical Linguistics: a Symposium. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lehnert, M. (1959). Die Entstehung des neuenglischen its. Mélanges de Linguistique et de Philologie: Fernand Mossé in memoriam. Paris: Didier ,231–7.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. (1985). The influence of semantic fields on semantic change. In Fisiak, (1985) ,283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leidig, P. (1941). Französische Lehnwörter und Lehnbedeutungen im Englischen des 18. Jahrhunderts. Bochum-Langendreer: Pöppinghaus.Google Scholar
Leith, , (1983). A Social History of English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Leonard, S. A. (1929). The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700–1800. (University of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature 25). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Levin, S. (1984). The Greek diacritical marks and their application to other languages in the Renaissance. General Linguistics 24: 21–37.Google Scholar
Levins, P. (1570). Manipulus vocabulorum. Wheatley, H. B. (ed.). (1867), Manipulus vocabulorum: a Rhyming Dictionary of the English Language, by Peter Levins (1570). Early English Text Society, old series 27.Google Scholar
Levins, P. (1570). Manipulus Vocabulorum. London: Henrie Bynneman for John Waley [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 195, 1969]; ed. Wheatley, H. B., 1867, EETS 27.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1964). The Discarded Image.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1967 [1960]). Studies in Words. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1969a). Variation in Shakespeare and others. In Hooper, (1969) ,94–87.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1969b). The fifteenth-century heroic line. In Hooper, (1969) ,45–57.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. H. (1894). The History of the English Paragraph.University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (?1672). Plain and Short Rules for Pointing Periods grammatically [lacks title page]Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. (1979). Principles of Diachronic Syntax.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindelöf, U. (1937). English Verb–Adverb Groups Converted into Nouns (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 9: 5). Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Lipka, L. (1985). Inferential features in historical semantics. In Fisiak, (1985) ,339–54.Google Scholar
Lipka, L. (1990). An Outline of English Lexicolog y. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisle, W. (1633). A Saxon Treatise Concerning the Old and New Testament. London.Google Scholar
Little, G. D. (1984). Punctuation. In Moran, M. G. & Funsford, R. F. (eds.). Research in Composition and Rhetoric: a Bibliographic Sourcebook. Westport, CT & London: Greenwood Press: 371–98.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1700 [1690]). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch, P. H. (ed.). (1975). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. [1690]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longland, C. (1742 [1655–1656]). Letters. In A Collection of the State Papers of John Thurloe, Esq.London: Gyles, Woodward & Davis, IV.Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (1987). New edn. London: Longman.
Lowth, R. (1762). A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London: J. Hughs for Millar, A. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 18, 1967]Google Scholar
Lowth, R. (1775 [1979]). A Short Introduction to English Grammar. Scholars'facsimi les and reprints. New York: Delmar.Google Scholar
Lucas, P. (1973). Consistency and correctness in the orthographic usage of John Capgrave's Chronicle. Studia Neophilologica 45: 323–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luckombe, P. (1771). Points. The History and Art of Printing.London: Johnson.Google Scholar
Luick, K. (1896). Untersuchungen zur englischen Lautlehre. Strasburg: Trübner. (1914/1941). Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Leipzig: Tauchnitz. Reprinted: 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Luick, K. (1906). Beiträge zur englischen Grammatik IV: der Ursprung der Fügung a good one. Anglia 29: 339–46.Google Scholar
Luick, K. (1913). Zur Vorgeschichte der Fügung a good one. Anglia 37: 543–8.Google Scholar
Luick, K. (1916). Berichtigung (Zur Erörtetung über a good one). Anglia 39: 247–5.Google Scholar
Lutz, A. (1988). On the historical phonotactics of English. In Kastovsky, & Bauer, (1988) ,221–40.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Deixis and anaphora. In Myers, T. (ed.). The Development of Conversation and Discourse.Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mack, P. (ed.). (1994). Renaissance Rhetoric.Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madan, F. (1926). The Oxford Press, 1650–1675. The Library. 4th series 6: 113–47.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, C. (1988). The transition from the impersonal to the personal use of the verb like in late Middle English and Early Modern English – some previously neglected determinants of variation. In Markus, (1988) ,210–18.Google Scholar
Maitaire, M. (1712). The English Grammar.London: Clements. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 6, 1967]Google Scholar
Manutius, A. (1905 [1561]). Interpungendi ratio. In Husband, T. F. & Husband, M. F. A.. Punctuation: its Principles and Practice.London: Routledge, tr. in appendix B.Google Scholar
Manwayring, H. (1644). The Sea-mans Dictionary. London: G. M. for John Bellamy. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 328, 1972]Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: a Synchronic–Diachronic Approach. 2nd edn. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Markus, M. (1988). Middle English and Early Modern English letters as the basis of a linguistic corpus. In Mair, Christian, et al. (eds.). Historical English. Innsbruck University ,167–85.Google Scholar
Markus, M. (1990). Mittelenglisches Studienbuch. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Markus, M. (ed.). (1988). Historical English, on the Occasion of Karl Brunner's 100th Birthday.Innsbruck: AMOEGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, = Marlowe, C. (1586–1593). The Complete Works of Christopher Marlowe 1–2. Bowers, F. (ed.). (1973). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, B. (1749). Lingua Britannica Reformata. London: for S. Birt etc. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 258, 1970] (2nd edn. 1754).Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (ed.). (1988). Ovid Renewed: Ovidian Influences on Literature and Art from the Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, G. (1622, 1623 [1910]). Grammaire angloise. Brotanek, R. (ed.). Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Mason, G. (1633). Grammaire angloise. London: Nat Butter.Google Scholar
Mathews, M. M. (ed.). (1931). The Beginnings of American English. Essays and Comments. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1991). Morphology. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. (1981). Syntax.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, W. (1938). Cockney Past and Present. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mätzner, E. (1880–1885). Englische Grammatik. 3. Aufl. Berlin: WeidmannGoogle Scholar
Mazzeo, J. A. (1964). Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Studies.New York: Columbia University Press, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mazzon, G. (1995). Pronouns and terms of address in Shakespearean English: a socio-affective marking system in transition. Vienna English Working Papers 4 (1): 20–42.Google Scholar
McClure, J. D. (1994). English in Scotland. In Burchfield, (1994) ,23–93.Google Scholar
McConchie, R. W. (1992). What were Robert Cawdrey's Hard Words? Learned terms in A Table Alphabeticall (1604). In Pahta et al. (1992) ,51–8.Google Scholar
McConchie, R. W. (1997). Lexicography and Physicke. The Record of Sixteenth-Century English Medical Terminology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGann, J. J. (1996). The Poetics of Sensibility: a Revolution in Literary Style.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1961). ‘Graphology’ and meaning. Archivum Linguisticum 13: 107–20.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1983). Present indicative plural forms in the Later Middle English of the North Midlands. In Gray, & Stanley, (1983) ,235–44.Google Scholar
McIntosh, C. (1986). Common and Courtly Language: the Stylistics of Social Class in Eighteenth-Century English Literature.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
McKnight, G. H. (1968 [1928]). The Evolution of the English Language. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Medina, P. (1595). The Arte of Nauigation. Trans. Frampton, J.. London: T. Dawson.Google Scholar
Meier, H. H. (1953). Der indefinite Agens im Mittelenglischen 1050–1350: die Wörter und Wendungen für ‘man’.Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (ed.) (1977). Langues en contact: pidgins-creoles – (languages in contact). Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 75. Tübingen: TBL-Verlag Narr.Google Scholar
Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The Language of Law. Boston & Toronto: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Menner, R. J. (1945). Multiple meaning and change of meaning in English. Language 21: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meriton, G. (1683). A Yorkshire Dialogue, ed. Cawley, A. C.. Leeds: Yorkshire Dialect Society (1959).Google Scholar
Meurman-Solin, A. (1993). Variation and Change in Early Scottish Prose, Studies Based on the Helsinki Corpus of Older Scots. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Meurman-Solin, A. (1993). Variation and Change in Early Scottish Prose; Studies Based on the Helsinki Corpus of Older Scots (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Dissertationes Humanarum Litterarum 65). Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Michael, I. (1970). English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, I. (1987). The Teaching of English from the Sixteenth Century to 1870.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middle English Dictionary (1954–). Prepared Kurath, H. & Kuhn, S. M. et al. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Miège, G. (1685). Nouvelle M'ethode pour Apprendre l'Anglois. London: Thomas Basset. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 216, 1970]Google Scholar
Miège, G. (1687). The Grounds of the French Tongue.London: Basset. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 157, 1969]Google Scholar
Miège, G. (1688). The English Grammar.London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 152, 1969]Google Scholar
Miles, J. (1964). Eras and Modes in English Poetry. Revised edition. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Miles, J. (1967). Style and Proportion: The Language of Prose and Poetry.Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Miles, J. (1974). Poetry and Change.University of California Press.Google Scholar
Milic, L. T. (1967). A Quantitative Approach to the Style of Jonathan Swift.The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, C. M. (1966). Pronominal case in Shakespearian imperatives. Language 42: 10–17. Reprinted in Salmon, & Burness, (1987) ,301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. (1983). On the sociolinguistic history of /h/-dropping in English. In Davenport, M., et al., (eds.) Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics. Odense University Press ,37–54.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (1983). On the sociolinguistic history of /h/-dropping in English. In Davenport, et al. (1983) ,37–54.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (1992). Middle English dialectology. In Blake, N. F., (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English language, II. 1476-1776. Cambridge University Press ,156–206.Google Scholar
Milton, Paradise Lost=Milton, J. (1667 [1952]). Paradise Lost in Darbishire, H. (ed.). (1952). The Poetical Works of John Milton I-II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Minkova, D. (1997). Constraint ranking in Middle English stress-shifting. English Language and Linguistics 1 (1): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkova, D. & Stockwell, R. P. (1990). The Early Modern English vowels: more O’ Lass. Diachronica VII (2): 199–214.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. & Deane, P. M.. (1962). Abstract of British Historical Statistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1985). Old English Syntax I–II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsui, T. (1958). Relative pronouns in Shakespeare's colloquial English. In Araki, K., T. Egawa, Oyama, T. & Yasui, M. (eds.). Studies in English Grammar and Linguistics: a Miscellany in Honour of Takanobu Otsuka.Tokyo: Kenkyusha ,335–49.Google Scholar
Moessner, L. (1992). Relative constructions and functional amalgamation in Early Modern English. In Rissanen, et al (1992) ,336–51.Google Scholar
Moessner, L. (1994). Early Modern English passive constructions. In Kastovsky, (1994) ,217–31.Google Scholar
Monk, S. H. (1935). The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in Eighteenth-Century England.New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Monteith, R. (1704). The True and Genuine Art, of Exact Pointing.Edinburgh: the Author.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. (1994). The evolution of verb concord in Scots. In Fenton, & MacDonald, (1994) ,81–95.Google Scholar
More, [1557] =More, T. (1557). The Workes of Sir Thomas More wrytten by him in the Englysh Tonge. Ed. Rastell, W.. London.Google Scholar
More, T. = More, T. (1963–). The Complete Works of St Thomas More 1–15. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, D. B. (1972). The Religious Sublime: Christian Poetry and Critical Tradition in Eighteenth-Century England.Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Moskowich, I. & Seoane, E. (1995). The lexical Scandinavian element in Early Modern English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 96 (4): 339–415.Google Scholar
Mossé, F. (1938). Histoire de la forme périphrastique ‘^tre’ +participe présent en Germanique.Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Mossé, F. (1950). Handbook of Middle English.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mossé, F. (1952). A Handbook of Middle English, tr. Walker, J. A.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mountford, J. (1969). Writing. In Meetham, A. R. and Hudson, R. A. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Linguistics, Information and Control. Oxford: Pergamon Press ,627–33.Google Scholar
Mountford, J. (1976). Spelling junctions in English. In Nickel, G. (ed.). Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Applied Linguistics. Stuttgart: Hochschul Verlag ,469–79.Google Scholar
Mountford, J. (1990). The writing of language. In Collinge, N. E. (ed.). An Encyclopaedia of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moxon, J. (1962 [1958: 1683–1684]). Mechanick Exercises. 2nd (modern) edn. Davis, H. & Carter, H. (eds.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. M. (1984). The Native Tongue and the Word.University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Muir, K. (ed.). (1960). Collected Poems of Sir Thomas Wyatt. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mulcaster, R. (1582). The First Part of the Elementarie. London: Vautroullier. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 219, 1970]Google Scholar
Mulholland, J. (1967). ‘Thou’ and ‘You’ in Shakespeare: a study in the second person pronoun. Engish Studies 48: 1–9. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987).Google Scholar
Murdoch, P. (ed.). (1762). The Works of James Thomson.London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J. (ed.). (1983). Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric.University of California Press.Google Scholar
Murray, L. (1795). English Grammar. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 106, 1968]Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T. F. (1958). The English Syntactical Type ‘One the best man’ and its Occurrence in other Germanic Languages.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T. F. (1959). The Middle English syntactical type his own hand(s) with his own hands, himself with reference to other similar expressions. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 60: 267–86.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T. F. (1960). A Middle English Syntax. I. Parts of Speech.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nagucka, R. (1980). Grammatical peculiarities of the contact-clause in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 1: 171–84.Google Scholar
Nagucka, R. (1984). Explorations into syntactic obsoleteness: English a-X-ing and X-ing. In Fisiak, (1984) ,363–81.Google Scholar
Nakamura, F. (1988). A word on the regulation of the auxiliary do: Samuel Pepys's Diary as a test case. Mulberry 37 ,113–45.Google Scholar
Nares, R. (1784). Elements of Orthoepy: containing a Distinct View of the Whole Analogy of the English Language: so far as it relates to Pronunciation, Accent, and Quantity. London: T. Payne & Son.Google Scholar
Nashe, = Nashe, T.. (1589–1601). The Works of Thomas Nashe. 4 vols. McKerrow, R. B. & Wilson, F. P. (eds.). (1958. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nehls, D. (1974). Synchron-diachrone Untersuchungen zur Expanded Form im Englischen: eine struktural-funktionale Analyse.Munich: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, H. J. (1971). Towards a diachronic analysis of vocabulary. Cahiers de lexicologie 18: 29–42.Google Scholar
Neumann, J. H. (1944). Jonathan Swift and English spelling. Studies in Philology 41: 79–85.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1989). A corpus of Early Modern Standard English in a socio-historical perspective. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 90: 67–110.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H.. (1993). Its strength and the beauty of it: the standardisation of the third person neuter possessive in Early Modern English. In Stein, & Ostade, Tieken-Boon (1994) ,171–216.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (1997). To Explain the Present: Studies in the changing English language in honor of Matti Rissanen.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Rissanen, M. (1986). Do you support the do-support? Emphatic and non-emphatic do in affirmative statements in present-day spoken English. In Jacobson, S. (ed.). Papers from the the Third Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,35–50.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (1983). A corpus of colloquial Early Modern English for a lexical–syntactic study: evidence for consistency and variation. In Jacobson, S. (ed.), Papers from the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation (Stockholm Studies in English 57). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,109–22.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (1983). A corpus of colloquial Early Modern English for a lexical–syntactic study: evidence for consistency and variation. In Jacobson, S. (ed.). Papers from the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation. (Acta Universitatis Stockholmensis 57.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,109–22.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (1987). Change from above: a morphosyntactic comparison of two Early Modern English editions of The Book of Common Prayer. In Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (ed.). Neophilologica Fennica.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique ,295–315.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (1991). ‘BUT', ‘ONLY', ‘JUST’: Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English 1500–1900 (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique 51). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (1992). Present. In Pahta et al. (1992): 59–65.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (1993). Early Modern English. In Rissanen, et al. (1993) ,53–73.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (1994). Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, (1994).Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (1997). The processes of adverb derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. In Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. & Heikkonen, K. (eds.). Grammaticalization at Work, Studies of Long-term Developments in English (Topics in English Linguistics 24). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter ,145–189.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (eds.). (1997). To Explain the Present. Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Memoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevanlinna, S. (1974). Background and history of the parenthetic as who say/saith in Old and Middle English literature. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 75: 568–601.Google Scholar
[Newbery, J.] (1745). An Easy Spelling Dictionary.London: Newbery.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. & Honey, J. (eds.). (1988). An Historic Tongue. Studies in English Linguisticsin Memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nocera Avila, C., Pantaleo, N. & Pezzini, D. (eds.). (1992). Early Modern English: Trends, Forms and Texts (Biblioteca della ricerca, Cultura straniera 49). Fasano: Schena.Google Scholar
Nokes, D. (1978). ‘Hack at Tom Poley's’: Swift's use of puns. In Probyn, C. (ed.). The Art of Jonathan Swift.London: Vision ,43–56.Google Scholar
Norbrook, D. & Woudhuysen, H. R., (eds.). (1992). The Penguin Book of Renaissance Verse 1509–1659.London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Norri, J. (1992). Names of Sicknesses in English, 1400–1550: an Exploration of the Lexical Field (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Dissertationes Humanarum Litterarum 63). Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Norri, J. (1998). Names of Body Parts in English, 1400–1550 (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Humaniora 291). Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Norton, D. (1985). The Bible as a reviver of words: the evidence of Anthony Purver, a mid-eighteenth-century critic of the English of the King James Bible. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86: 515–33.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G. (1990). The Linguistics of Punctuation. Stanford, CT: Centre for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Nunnally, T. (1992). Man's son/son of man: translation, textual conditioning, and the history of the English genitive. In Rissanen, et al. (1992): 359–72.Google Scholar
O Sé, D. (1986). Word-stress in Hiberno-English. In Harris, et al. (1986) ,97–110.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, W. R. & Todd, L. (1980). Variety in Contemporary English. London: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogura, M. & Wang, W. S.-Y. (1995). Lexical diffusion in semantic change: with special reference to universal changes. Folia Linguistica Historica 16/1–2: 29–73.Google Scholar
Ogura, M. (1990). What has happened to ‘impersonal’ constructions?Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 91: 31–55.Google Scholar
Onions, C. T. (1986 [1911]). A Shakespeare Glossary. 3rd edn. rev. Eagleson, R. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Orr, J. (1948). The Impact of French upon English.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. E. (1958). Branded Words in English Dictionaries before Johnson. Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. (1963). Formal and informal spelling in the eighteenth century. English Studies 44: 267–75.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. (1984). Informal spelling systems in Early Modern English: 1500–1800. In Blake, N. F. & Jones, C. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development (CECTAL Conference Papers Series, No. 3). Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield ,123–36.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. (1985). Spelling-book rules and the capitalisation of nouns in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In Arn, M.-J. & Wirtjes, H. (eds.). Historical and Editorial Studies on Medieval and Early Modern English. Groningen: Wolters- Noordhoff ,49–61.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. (1990). Archaism. In Hamilton, A. C. et al. (eds.). The Spenser Encyclopedia.University of Toronto Press ,50–2.Google Scholar
Ossleton, N. (1984). Informal spelling systems in Early Modern English: 1500–1800. In Blake, & Jones, (1984),123–37Google Scholar
Otter, A. G. (1990). Lekker scrabbling: discovery and exploration of once-Dutch words in the onlineOxford English Dictionary. English Studies 71: 261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otway, = Otway, T.The Works of Thomas Otway. 2 vols. (a1685 [1812]). London: F C. & J.Rivington etc.Google Scholar
Padelford, F. M. & Maxwell, W. C.. (1926). The compound words in Spenser's poetry. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 25 (4): 498–516.Google Scholar
Page, N. 2(1988). Speech in the English Novel. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahta, P. I. Taavitsainen & Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (eds.). (1992). “As Who Say” – Many Happy Returns; Essays in Honour of Saara Nevanlinna. Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, M. (1997). A medieval case of grammaticalization: Methinks. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.). (1997b): 371–403.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. J. (1965). The Rise of English Studies.University of Hull Publications. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palsgrave, J. (1530). Lesclarcissement de la langue francoyse. London: J. Haukyns. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 190, 1969]Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1960). Renaissance and Renascences in Western Art.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Parker, E. L. (1938). The cursus in Sir Thomas Browne. PMLA 53: 1037–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, M. B. (1992). Pause and Effect: an Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West.Aldershot: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. (1992). Pause and Effect: an Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Aldershot: Scolar.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, J. (1974/1975). The Letter Book of John Parkhurst, Bishop of Norwich, Compiled during the Years 1571–5 (Publications of the Norfolk Record Society 43). Ed. Houlbrooke, R.A.. Norwich: Norfolk Record Society.Google Scholar
Partridge, A. C. (1953). Studies in the Syntax of Ben Jonson's Plays.Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes.Google Scholar
Partridge, A. C. (1953). The Accidence of Ben Jonson's Plays, Masques and Entertainments. Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes.Google Scholar
Partridge, A. C. (1964). The historical development of punctuation marks. In his Orthography in Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama. London: Arnold, appendix 8 ,182–94.Google Scholar
Partridge, A. C. (1969). Tudor to Augustan English.London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Partridge, E. (1935). Slang To-day and Yesterday. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Partridge, E. (1947). Usage and Abusage.London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Partridge, E. (1968 [1947]). Shakespeare's Bawdy. New edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peacham, H. (1577). The Garden of Eloquence. London: H. Iackson. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 267, 1971]Google Scholar
Peacham, H. (1593). The Garden of Eloquence. Facsimile edn. with an introduction by Crane, W. G. (Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints). Gainesville, FL, 1954.Google Scholar
Peitsara, K. (1992). On the development of the by-agent in English. In Rissanen, et al. (1992) ,379–400.Google Scholar
Peitsara, K. (1993). On the development of the by-agent in English. In Rissanen, et al. (1993) ,219–33.Google Scholar
Peitsara, K. (1997). The development of reflexive strategies in English. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.) (1997b): 277–370.Google Scholar
Pemberton, C. (ed.). (1899). Queen Elizabeth's Englishings of Boethius, Plutarch, jc. Early English Text Society, old series 113.Google Scholar
Pennanen, E. V. (1951). Chapters on the Language in Ben Jonson's Dramatic Works (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B 39). Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Pennanen, E. V. (1966). Contributions to the Study of Back-Formation in English (Acta Academiae Socialis A 4). Tampere: Yhteiskunnallinen Korkeakoulu.Google Scholar
Pennanen, E. V. (1971a). On the Introduction of French Loan-Words into English (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis A 38). Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Pennanen, E. V. (1971b). Conversion and Zero-Derivation in English (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis A 40). Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Pepys, = Pepys, S. (1660–1619 [1970–1983]). The Diary of Samuel Pepys 1–11. Latham, R. & Matthews, W. (eds.). London: G. Bell..Google Scholar
Perez, A. (1990). Time in motion: grammaticalization of the be going to construction in English. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 49–64.Google Scholar
Peters, H. (1994). Degree adverbs in Early Modern English letters. In Kastovsky, (1994) ,269–88.Google Scholar
Phillips, E. (1658). The New World of English Words.London: Brooke. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 162, 1969]Google Scholar
Phillips, K. C. (1984). Language and Class in Victorian England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Piper, W. B. (1969). The Heroic Couplet.Cleveland & London: The Press of Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1984). The modals story retold. Studies in Language 8: 305–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, G. (1980). Boileau and the Nature of Neo-Classicism.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, J. (1663). Practical Rhetorick. Or, certain little sentences varied according to the rules prescribed by Erasmus. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Potkay, A. (1994). The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Poussa, P. (1982). The evolution of early standard English: the creolization hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14 ,69–86.Google Scholar
Poussa, P. (1992). Pragmatics of this and that. In Rissanen, et al. (1992) ,401–17.Google Scholar
Poutsma, H. (1904–1926). A Grammar of Late Modern English. 4 vols. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. L. (1981). Literary cooperation and implicature. In Freeman, (1981) ,377–412.Google Scholar
Price, O. (1665). The Vocal Organ. Oxford: William Hall. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 227, 1970]Google Scholar
Priestley, J. (1761). The Rudiments of English Grammar. London: for R. Griffiths. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 210, 1969]Google Scholar
Priestley, J. (1762 [1970]). Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Menston: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. (1777). A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism.London: J. Johnson. Facsimile reprint ed. Bevilacqua, V. M. & Murphy, R., Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Prins, A. A. (1952). French Influence in English Phrasing.Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Prins, A. A. (1952). French Influence in English Phrasing. Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Pugliatti, P. (1992). Shakespeare's names for rebellion. In Avila, Nocera et al. (1992) ,81–93.Google Scholar
Puttenham, G. (1589). The Arte of English Poesie.London: R. Field.Google Scholar
Puttenham, G. (1589). The Arte of English Poesie. Willock, G. D. & Walker, A. (eds.). (1970). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Puttenham, G. (1589). The Arte of English Poesie. London: R. Field. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 110, 1968]Google Scholar
Puttenham, G.Spectator= (1711–1714). The Spectator. 5 vols. Bond, D. F. (ed.). (1965). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Puttenham, G.[English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) = Facsimiles in English Linguistics, 1500–1800. See Alston (1974)] 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, No. 135, II ,32–6.Google Scholar
Puttenham, G. [1589]. The Arte of English Poesie. ed. Willcock, G. D. & Walker, A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.. (1972). A Grammar of Contemporary English.Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Swartvik, J.. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rainer, E. M. (1989). Das Perfect im Spätmittel- und Frühneuenglischen: eine Frequenz- und Funktionsanalyse anhand von Brieftexten.Innsbruck: Institut für Anglistik, University of Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Ramus, P. (1572). Grammatica.Paris: apud Andrean Wechelum.Google Scholar
Ramus, P. (1585). The Rudimentes of P. Ramus his Latine Grammar.London: Walde-graue [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 306, 1971]Google Scholar
Randall, D. B. J. (1989). “X me no x's”: some examples (mainly from the Renaissance) of the neologizing imperative retort. American Speech 64: 233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastell, J. (1579). An Exposition of Certaine Difficult and Obscure Wordes and Termes of the Lawes of This Realme. London: R. Tottel. [EE 210, 1969]Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. & Nurmi, A. (1997). Dummies on the move: prop-ONE and affirmative DO in the 17th century. In Nevalanien, & Kahlas-Tarkka, (eds.), (1997) ,395–417.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. & Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (1997). Indefinite pronouns with singular human reference. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.). (1997b): 17–85.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1991). The Noun Phrase in Early Sixteenth-Century English: a Study Based on Sir Thomas More's Writings.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1991). The Noun Phrase in Early Sixteenth-Century English: a Study Based on Sir Thomas More's Writings (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique 50). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1994a). The development of the compound pronouns in -body and -one in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, (1994) ,301–24.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1994b). The position of adjectival modifiers in Late Middle English noun phrases. In Fries, et al. (eds.), (1994): 159–68.Google Scholar
Ray, J. (1674). A Collection of English Words not Generally Used. London (21691). [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 145, 1969]Google Scholar
Reddick, A. (1990). The Making of Johnson's Dictionary 1746–1773.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Redfern, W. (1984). Puns.Oxford: Basil Blackwell/André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. (1934). On the Development of English Verbs from Latin and French Past Participles (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 6: 4). Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. (1936). On continuative relative clauses in English. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 9(3): 1–61.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. (1936). Verb Doublets of Latin Origin in English (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 8: 4). Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. (1937). Some notes on the origin of the relative combination the which. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 38: 146–88.Google Scholar
Richardson, Clarissa = Richardson, T. (1747–1748 [1751]). Clarrisa, Or The History of a Young Lady. Everyman edition. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Richardson, Pamela =Richardson, T. (1739–1740 [1785]). Pamela, Or Virtue Rewarded … Everyman edition. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Ricks, C. (1963). Milton's Grand Style.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1967). The Uses of ‘one’ in Old and Early Middle English.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1975). “Strange and inkhorne tearmes”, Loan-words as style markers in the prose of Edward Hall, Thomas Elyot, Thomas More and Roger Ascham. In Ringbom, H. (ed.). Style and Text. Stockholm: Skriptor ,250–62.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1984). The choice of relative pronouns in seventeenth century American English. In Fisiak, (1984) ,417–35.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1985). Periphrastic do in affirmative statements in Early American English. Journal of English Linguistics 18 ,163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1989). The conjunction for in Early Modern English. Nowele 14: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1991a). Spoken language and the history of do-periphrasis. In Kastovsky, (1991) ,321–42.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1991b). On the history of that/zero as object clause links in English. In Aijmer, K. & Altenberg, B. (eds.). English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik.London & New York: Longman ,272–89.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1993). The development of the pronominal uses of one in Middle and Early Modern English. In Rissanen, et al. (1993).Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1994). On the position of not in Early Modern English questions. In Kastovsky, (1994): 339–48.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1997). The pronominalization of one. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.), (1997b) ,87–143.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M., Ihalainen, O., Nevalainen, T. & Taavitsainen, I. (eds.). (1992). History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. & Palander-Collin, M. (eds.). (1993). Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. & Heikkonen, K. (eds.). (1997a). English in Transition. Corpus- based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. & Heikkonen, K. (eds.). (1997b). Grammaticalization at Work. Studies of Long-term Developments in English.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. & Palander-Collin, M. (eds.). (1993). Enter the Helsinki Corpus: Computer-Assisted Approaches to English Historical Linguistics.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M., Ihalainen, O., Nevalainen, T. & Taavitsainen, I. (eds.). (1992). History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. (1619). The Art of Pronuntiation. MS Bodl. Ashmole 1153. Dobson, E. J. (ed.). (1957), The Phonetic Writings of Robert Robinson. Early English Text Society, old series 238.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, F. & Cannon, G. (1994). Remarks on the origin and evolution of abbreviations and acronyms. In Fernández, F., Fuster, M. & Calvo, J. J. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics 1992 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 113). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins ,261–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J. P. W. (1972). Grub Street: Studies in a Subculture.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. P. W. (1985). Literature and Popular Culture in Eighteenth-century England.Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. F. (1947). The Correspondence of Sir Thomas More. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1980). The relative clause marker in Scots English: diffusion, complexity and style as dimensions of syntactic change. Language in Society 9: 221–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1981). Syntactic complexity, relativization and stylistic levels in Middle Scots. Folia Linguistica Historica 1: 56–77.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1982). Socio-Historical Linguistics: its Status and Methodology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984). Towards a typology of relative-clause formation strategies in Germanic. In Fisiak, (1984) ,437–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1985). Variability in word formation patterns and productivity in the history of English. In Fisiak, J. (ed.). Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 34). Amsterdam: Benjamins, Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press ,451–65.Google Scholar
Ronberg, G. (1992). A Way with Words. The Language of English Renaissance Literature.London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ross, C. H. (1893). The absolute participle in Middle English and Modern English. PMLA 8 ,245–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, C. H. (1893). The Absolute Participle in Middle and Modern English.Baltimore: The Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Rubel, V. L. (1941). Poetic Diction in the English Renaissance from Skelton through Spenser.New York: Modern Language Association of America Revolving Fund Series. (reprint Kraus Reprint Corporation New York, 1966).Google Scholar
Rudskoger, A. (1952). Fair, Foul, Nice, Proper, A Contribution to the Study of Polysemy (Gothenburg Studies in English 1). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Rudskoger, A. (1970). Plain, A Study in Co-Text and Context (Stockholm Studies in English 22). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ruthven, K. K. (1969). The Conceit.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Rydén, M. & Brorström, S. (1987). The ‘be/have’ Variation with Intransitives in English.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Rydén, M. (1966). Relative Constructions in early Sixteenth-Century English, with Special Reference to Sir Thomas Elyot.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Rydén, M. (1970). Coordination of Relative Clauses in Sixteenth-Century English.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Rydén, M. (1983). English relatives revisited. Moderna Språk 77: 209–18.Google Scholar
Rydén, M. (1984). The English Plant Names in ‘The Grete Herball’ (1526) (Stockholm Studies in English 71). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Rynell, A. (1987). Antedatings and Additions for Oxford English Dictionary from the Catalogue of Prints of Political and Personal Satire in the British Museum (Stockholm Studies in English 72). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Saito, T. (1961). The development of relative pronouns in modern colloquial English: a statistical survey of the development of their usage seen in British prose plays from the sixteenth century to the present time. The Scientific Reports of Mugokawa Women's University 8: 67–89.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1966). Sentence structures in colloquial Shakespearian English. Transactions of the Philological Society 1965. Reprinted in Salmon, & Burness, (1987) ,265–300.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1967). Elizabethan colloquial English in the Falstaff plays. Leeds Studies in English ns 1. Reprinted in Salmon, & Burness, (1987) ,37–70.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1970). Some functions of Shakespearian word-formation. Shakespeare Survey 23: 13–26. Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987) ,193–206.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1972). The Works of Francis Lodwick: a Study of his Writings in the Intellectual Context of the Seventeenth Century.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1979). The Study of Language in Seventeenth-Century England.Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1986). The spelling and punctuation of Shakespeare's time. In @@Wells & Taylor (1986), xlii–lvi.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1987). Some functions of Shakespearian word-formation. In Salmon, & Burness, (1987) ,193–206.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1988) [1962]). Early seventeenth-century punctuation as a guide to sentence structure. Review of English Studies ns 13: 347–60. Repr. in her The Study of Language in Seventeenth-Century England. Amsterdam: Benjamins ,47–60.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1988). English punctuation theory 1500–1800. Anglia 106: 285–314.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1989). John Rastell and the normalization of early sixteenth-century orthography. In Breivik, L. E., Hille, A. and Johansson, S. (eds). Essays on English Language in Honour of Bertil Sundby. Oslo: Novus Forlag ,289–301.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1994). John Hart and the Beginnings of Phonetics in Sixteenth-Century England. In Carlon, K., Davidse, K. & Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (eds.). Perspectives on English: Studies in Honour of Emma Vorlat, Louvain: Peeters ,1–20.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1996 [1982]). Wh- and Yes/No questions; Charles Butler's Grammar (1633) and the history of a linguistic concept. In Anderson, J. M. (ed.). Language form and linguistic variation: Papers dedicated to Angus McIntosh. Amsterdam: Benjamins,401–26. Reprinted in Salmon, V. (1996). Language and Society in Early Modern England. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. & Burness, E. (1987). Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, V. & Burness, E. (eds.). (1987). A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, M. L. (1972). Linguistic Evolution with Special Reference to English.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, M. L. (1981). Spelling and dialect in the late and post Middle English periods. In Benskin, M. & Samuels, M. L. (eds.). So Meny People Langages and Tonges. Edinburgh: Benskin & Samuels ,43–54.Google Scholar
Sanders, A. (1994). The Short Oxford History of English Literature.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Savory, T. H. (1967). The Language of Science. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Scaglione, A. (1972). The Classical Theory of Composition.University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, J. (1980). Documentation in the Oxford English Dictionary: Shakespeare and Nashe as Test Cases. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, J. (1989a). Early Modern English Lexicography. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, J. (1989b). Early Modern English: Oxford English Dictionary, New Oxford English Dictionary, EMED. In Bailey, R. W. (ed.). Dictionaries of English, Prospects for the Record of Our Language. Cambridge University Press ,66–74.Google Scholar
Schäfter, J. (1989). Early Modern English Lexicography. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scheffer, J. (1975). The Progressive in English.Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. (1977). Der englische Wortschatz (Grundlagen der Anglistik und Amerikanistik 9). Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. (1982). Shakespeares Englisch (Grundlagen der Anglistik und Amerikanistik 12). Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schendl, H. (1996). The 3rd plural present indicative in Early Modern English – variation and linguistic contact. In Britton, (1996) ,144–60.Google Scholar
Scheurwegs, G. (1964). The relative pronouns in the sixteenth century plays Roister Doister and Respublica. A frequency study. English Studies, Presented to R. W. Zandwoort on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. English Studies 45: Supplement ,84–9.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlauch, M. (1959). The English Language in Modern Times (since 1400).Warsaw: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Schlauch, M. (1987). The social background of Shakespeare's malapropisms. In Salmon, & Burness, (1987) ,71–99.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. (1992). Who(m)? constraints on the loss of case marking of wh-pro-nouns in the English of Shakespeare and other poets of the Early Modern English period. In Rissanen, et al. (1992) ,437–52.Google Scholar
Scott, C. T. (1967). On the dating of NE ee and ea spellings from Middle English e and e. In Rauch, I. & Scott, C. T. (eds.). Approaches in Linguistic Methodology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Scragg, D. G. (1974). History of English Spelling. Manchester University Press & New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Sebeok, T. A. (ed.). (1960). Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, M. S. (1961 [1935]). A History of Foreign Words in English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Shadwell, = Shadwell, T. (1672). Epsom-Wells. In The Complete Works of Thomas Shadwell2. Ed. Summers, M.. (1927). London: The Fortune Press (Alten).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, = Shakespeare, W. (a1616 [1623). The Complete Works. Original Spelling Edition. Wells, S., Taylor, G., Jowett, J. & Montgomery, W. (eds.). (1986). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (1623). Comedies, Histories jc Tragedies [First Folio], facs. by Hinman, Ch., The Norton Facsimile. New York: Norton, 1968.Google Scholar
Shen, Y. (1987). On the structure and understanding of poetic oxymoron. Poetics Today 8 (1): 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherbo, A. (1975). English Poetic Diction from Chaucer to Wordsworth.Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Sheridan, = Sheridan, R. B. (1775–1759). The Plays of Richard Brinsley Sheridan. Everyman edition. London: J. M. Dent & Co.Google Scholar
Sheridan, T. (1761). A Dissertation on the Causes of the Difficulties which Occur in Learning the English Language. London: for R. and J. Dodsley [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 40, 1967]Google Scholar
Sheridan, T. (1762). A Course of Lectures on Elocution.London: Millar, R. & J. Dodsley, Davies [et al]. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 129, 1968]Google Scholar
Sheridan, T. (1762). A Course of Lectures on Elocution. London: W. Strahan. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 129, 1968]Google Scholar
Sheridan, T. (1775). Lectures on the Art of Reading. 2 vols. London: J. Dodsley et al.Google Scholar
Sheridan, T. (1780). A Geneal Dictionary of the English Language. Two volumes. London: for J. Dodsley. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 50, 1967]Google Scholar
Sheridan, T. (1780). A General Dictionary of the English Language. London: J. Dodsley. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 50, 1967]Google Scholar
Sheridan, T. (1781). A rhetorical grammar of the English language, calculated solely for the purposes of teaching propriety of pronunciation, and justness of delivery, in that tongue, by the organ of speech. Dublin: Price, Whitestone. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 146, 1969]Google Scholar
Sherman, D. (1975). Noun-verb stress alternation: an example of lexical diffusion of a sound change in English. Journal of English Linguistics 43: 71ff.Google Scholar
Sichermann, C. M. (1982). Meter and meaning in Shakespeare. Language and Style 15 ,169–92.Google Scholar
Sidney, P. (1595). An Apologie for Poetry. London: H. Olney.Google Scholar
Simpson, P. (1911). Shakespearean Punctuation. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (1970 [1892]). Principles of English Etymology. Second Series: The Foreign Element. College Park, MD: McGrath.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (ed.). (1873). Reprinted Glossaries. English Dialect Society, Series B; reprinted Vaduz: Kraus, 1965.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1991). Thomas Hobbes: rhetoric and the construction of morality. Proceedings of the British Academy 76 ,1–61.Google Scholar
Sklar, E. S. (1976). The possessive apostrophe: the development and decline of a crooked mark. College English 38: 175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. G. (ed.). (1904). Elizabethan Critical Essays. 2 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, G. G. (ed.). (1904). Elizabethan Critical Essays. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1996). An Historical Study of English. Function, Form and Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, J. C. & Selincourt, E. (eds.). (1912). The Poetical Works of Edmund Spenser. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (ed.). (1983). A Collection of Ranter Writings.London: Junction Books.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1963 [1568]). De recta et emendata linguae anglicanæ scriptione dialogus.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (Stockholm Studies in English, 56). In Danielsson, B. (ed. & tr.). Sir Thomas Smith's Literary and Linguistic Works, III. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Smith, T. (1568). De recta et emendata linguae anglicanae scriptione dialogus. In Danielsson, B. (ed. & tr.) (1963). Sir Thomas Smith: Literary and Linguistic Works [1542, 1549, 1568], III. Stockholm Studies in English, 56.Google Scholar
Smith, W. (1739). Dionysius Longinus on the Sublime.London: J. Watts. Facsimile edn. Delmar, New York: Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints, 1975.Google Scholar
Smollett, Roderick Random =Smollett, T. (1748 [1960]). The Adventures of Roderick Random. Everyman edition.Google Scholar
Söderholm, T. (1970). The end-rhymes of Marvell, Cowley, Crashaw, Lovelace and Vaughan. Acta Academiae Aboensis, Ser: Humaniora, 39: 2.
Söderlind, J. (1951, 1958). Verb Syntax in John Dryden's Prose, 2 vols. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequistska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Sonnino, L. (1968). A Handbook to Sixteenth-Century Rhetoric.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sørensen, K. (1957). Latin influence on English syntax. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique du Copenhague 11: 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, K. (1980). From postmodification to premodification. In Jacobson, S. (ed.). Papers from the Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell ,77–84.Google Scholar
Sørensen, K. (1983). The growth of cataphoric personal and possessive pronouns in English. In Davenport, M., Hansen, E. & Nielsen, H. F. (eds.). Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics.Odense: Odense University Press ,225–38.Google Scholar
Spasov, D. (1966). English Phrasal Verbs. Sofia: Naouka i Izkoustvo.Google Scholar
Spearing, A. C. (1985). Medieval to Renaissance in English Poetry.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Speght, T. (1602). The Workes of Our Ancient and Learned English Poet, Geffrey Chaucer, Newly Printed. London: A. Islip.Google Scholar
Speght, T. (ed.). 2(1602). The Workes of our Ancient and Learned English Poet, Geffrey Chaucer. London: Adam Islip for Bonham Norton.Google Scholar
Spenser, E. (1579). The Shepheardes Calender. London: H. Singleton.Google Scholar
Spevack, M. (1973). The Harvard Concordance to Shakespeare. Cambridge, MA: The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spies, H. (1897). Studien zur Geschichte des englischen Pronomens im XV. und XVI. Jahrhundert.Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Spingarn, J. E. (ed.). (1908). Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sprat, T. (1667). The History of the Royal-Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London.Google Scholar
Srigley, M. (1988). The lascivious metaphor: the evolution of the plain style in the seventeenth century. Studia Neophilologica 60: 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, L. (1927). Der adnominale Genitiv und sein Ersatz im Mittelenglischen und Frühneuenglischen. Giessener Beiträge 3: 1–35.Google Scholar
Stapleton, = Stapleton, T. (1565). A Fortresse of the Faith. Antwerp: John Laet.Google Scholar
Stapleton, T. (ed.). (1839). The Plumpton Correspondence. London: The Camden Society.Google Scholar
StarkeyStarkey, T. (c. 1530). England in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth. Ed. Cooper, J. M.. (1893). Early English Text Society, extra series.Google Scholar
Starnes, D. T. & Noyes, G. E. (1991 [1946]). The English Dictionary from Cawdrey to Johnson 1604–1755 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 57). New edn by Stein, G.. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starnes, Witt T. & Noyes., G. E. (1946). The English Dictionary from Cawdrey to Johnson, 1604–1755. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. (2nd edn. Stein, G. (ed.). (1991). Amsterdam: Benjamins.)Google Scholar
SteeleSteele, R. (1701–22 [1760–1771]). Dramatic Works. London.Google Scholar
Steele, R. (1987 [1709]). The Tatler.Bond, D. F. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, XVIII ,144–51.Google Scholar
Steen, G. (1994). Understanding Metaphor.Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Stein, D. (1974). Grammatik und Variation von Flexionsformen in der Sprache des Shakespeare Corpus. Munich: Tudur.Google Scholar
Stein, D. (1985a). Natürlicher syntaktischer Sprachwandel: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der englischen ‘do’-Periphrase in Fragen. München: Tudur.Google Scholar
Stein, D. (1985b). Discourse markers in Early Modern English. In Eaton, et al (1985) ,283–302.Google Scholar
Stein, D. (1985c). Stylistic aspects of syntactic change. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 153–78.Google Scholar
Stein, D. (1986). Syntactic variation and change: the case of do in questions in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 7: 121–49.Google Scholar
Stein, D. (1990). The Semantics of Syntactic Change: Aspects of the Evolution of do in English. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 47.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, D. & Ostade, I. Tieken-Boon (eds.). (1994). Towards a Standard English 1600–1800.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stein, G. (1973). English Word-Formation over Two Centuries: in Honour of Hans Marchand on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (Tübingen Beiträge zur Linguistik 34). Tübingen: TBL.Google Scholar
Stein, G. (1985). The English Dictionary before Cawdrey. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, G. (1997). John Palsgrave as Renaissance Linguist. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. & Waterhouse, R.. (1990). Literature, Language and Change: from Chaucer to the Present.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
SterneSterne, L. (a1768 [1956]). Tristram Shandy Everyman. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, E. (1662). Origines sacrae.London: Henry Mortlock.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1961). The Middle English ‘long close’ and ‘long open’ mid vowels. Texas Studies in Literature and Language 2, 2459–2468.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. & Minkova, D. (1988a). The English vowel shift – problems of coherence and explanation. In Kastovsky, & Bauer, (1988) ,395–410. (1988b). A rejoinder to Lass. In Kastovsky, & Bauer, (1988), 411–18.Google Scholar
Stoffel, C. (1955). Had rather and analogous phrases. Taalstudie 8 ,216–35.Google Scholar
Strang, B. M. H. (1970). A History of English. London & New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strang, B. (1970). A History of English.London and New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strang, B. (1982). Some aspects of the history of the be +ing construction. In Anderson, J. (ed.). Language Form and Linguistic Variation: Papers Dedicated to Angus McIntosh.Amsterdam: John Benjamins ,427–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strype, J. (1824 [1708–1709]). Annals of the Reformation.Oxford: Clarendon Press, IV ,108–9.Google Scholar
Sugden, H. W. (1936). The Grammar of Spenser's Faerie Queene. (Linguistic Society of America Language Dissertations Series) University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Sugden, H. W. (1936). The Grammar of Spenser's Faerie Queene.Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Sundby, B. (1985). Towards a Dictionary of English Normative Grammar. Dictionaries 7: 151–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundby, B., Bjørge, A. K. & Haugland, K. E.. (1991). A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800 (DENG). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundby, B., Bjørge, A. K. & Haugland, K. E. (1991). A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 63). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, T. (1988). Sentence Adverbials in English: a Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation.Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1877). Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1892–1898). A New English Grammar: Logical and Historical. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, Journal to Stella = Swift, J. (1712–1713). Journal to Stella, I–II. Williams, H. (ed.). (1948). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Swift, J. (1712). ‘A proposal for correcting, improving and ascertaining the English tongue.’ London: for Benj. Tooke. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 213, 1969]Google Scholar
Taylor, E. W. (1972). Shakespeare's use of s endings of the verbs to do and to have in the First Folio. CLA Journal 16 214–31. Repr. Salmon & Burness 1987. (1976). Shakespeare's use of eth and es ending verbs in the First Folio. CLA Journal 19 Reprinted in Salmon & Burness (1987).Google Scholar
The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1993). Prepared Lesley Brown. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
The Oxford English Dictionary (1989). 2nd edn. Prepared Simpson, J. A. & Weiner, E. S. C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1956). 3rd rev. edn. Prepared Little, W., Fowler, H. W. & Coulson, J.. Rev. & ed. Onions, C. T.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. (1963). Whence the semi-colon? In P.Foote and A. Brown. Early English and Norse Studies. London: Methuen ,191–5.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. (1984 [1971]). Religion and the Decline of Magic; Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century England. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. (1984 [1983]). Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (1961). The Founding of English Metre.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (1997). Lowth's corpus of prescriptivism. In Nevalainen, & Kahlas-Tarkka, (1997) ,451–63.Google Scholar
Thorndike, A. (1934). Parentheses in Shakespeare. The Shakespeare Association Bulletin 9: 31–7.Google Scholar
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1982). Double negation and eighteenth-century English grammars. Neophilologus 66: 278–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1985). Do-support in the writings of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu: a change in progress. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 127–51.Google Scholar
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1986). Negative do in eighteenth-century English: the power of prestige. Dutch Quarterly Review 16: 296–312.Google Scholar
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1987). The Auxiliary ‘do’ in Eighteenth-Century English: a Sociohistorical-Linguistic Approach.Dordrecht: JCG Printing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1987). The Auxiliary ‘do’ in Eighteenth-Century English: a Sociohistorical-Linguistic Approach. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1989). Dr Johnson and the auxiliary do. Folia Linguistica Historica 10: 145–62.Google Scholar
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1990). Exemplification in eighteenth-century grammars. In Adamson, et al. (1990) ,481–96.Google Scholar
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1990). The origin and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: a case of destigmatization. Nowele 16: 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillotson, G. (1964). Augustan Poetic Diction.University of London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W. (1943). The Elizabethan World Picture. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tottie, G. (1994). Any as an indefinite determiner in non-assertive clauses: evidence from Present-day and Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, (1994).Google Scholar
Tournier, J. (1985). Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l'anglais contemporain. Paris & Geneva: Champion-Slatkine.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & König, E.(1991). The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (eds.). Approaches to Grammaticalization.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, I: 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Pratt, M. L.. (1980). Linguistics for Students of Literature.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1972). A History of English Syntax: a Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1990). From less to more situated in language: the unidirectionality of semantic change. In Adamson, S., Law, V., Vincent, N. & Wright, S. (eds.). Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Treip, M. (1970). Milton's Punctuation and Changing English Usage, 1582–1676. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Trissino, G.G. (1529). A b c, etc. [A single sheet containing the alphabet, a series of simple syllables, the Lord's Prayer and a hymn to the Virgin.] See also T[olomeo] Ia[niculo]da Bressa: Vicenza, 1529…The additional characters invented by G G Trissino are employed. (British Library catalogue entry, pressmark C. 107. K.8).Google Scholar
Trnka, B. (1930). On the Syntax of the English Verb from Caxton to Dryden.Prague: Jednota Československych Matematiku a Fysiku.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trusler, J. (1766). The difference between words esteemed synonymous, in the English language; and, the proper choice of them determined. London: for J. Dodsley. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 207, 1970]Google Scholar
Tucker, A. [pseud. Edward Search, Esq.] (1773). Vocal Sound. London: T. Jones. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 165, 1969]Google Scholar
Tucker, S. I. (1967). Protean Shape. A Study in Eighteenth-Century Vocabulary and Usage. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, S. I. (1972). Enthusiasm. A Study in Semantic Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuite, T. (1726). The Oxford Spelling-Book. London: Hazard. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 41, 1967]Google Scholar
Tuve, R. (1966). Allegorical Imagery.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Udall, N. (1553). Respublica, an Interlude for Christmas 1553, Attributed to Nicholas Udall (EETS, os 226). Re-edited. Greg, W. W. (1952). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Uhrström, W. (1907). Studies on the Language of Samuel Richardson.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ukaji, M. (1973). Imperative constructions in Shakespeare. Studies in English Linguistics 2: 71–107.Google Scholar
Ukaji, M. (1978). Imperative Sentences in Early Modern English.Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Ukaji, M. (1992). ‘I not say’: bridge phenomenon in syntactic change. In Rissanen, et al. (1992) ,453–62.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1964). Semantics: an Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Underhill, E. (1953 [1554]). A lodging for the night. In Sutherland, J. (ed.). The Oxford Book of English Talk. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vallins, G. H. (1965). rev. Scragg, D. G.. Spelling. London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Vanbrugh, The Provoked Wife = Vanbrugh, J. (1726). The Provoked Wife in The Complete Works of Sir John Vanbrugh, vol. I. Dobree, B. & Webb, G. (eds.). (1925). Bloomsbury: The Nonesuch Press.Google Scholar
Vanneck, G. (1955). The colloquial preterite in modern American English. Word 14: 237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venezky, R. (1970). The Structure of English Orthography (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 82). The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, B. (1970). Classical Rhetoric in English Poetry.London: Macmillan. Reissued with new preface and annotated bibliography by Southern Illinois University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1981). Rhetorical and anti-rhetorical tropes: on writing the history of elocutio. Comparative Criticism 3: 105–32.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1985). The Royal Society and English prose style: a reassessment. In Vickers, B. & Struever, N. S., Rhetoric and the Pursuit of Truth, Los Angeles. Clark Memorial Library ,3–76.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1988). In Defence of Rhetoric.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (ed.). (1982). Rhetoric Revalued.Binghamton, N.Y: Centre for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (ed.). (1987). English Science, Bacon to Newton. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viles, E. & Furnivall, F. J. (eds.). (1869). The Fraternitye of Vacabondes etc. London: Early English Text Society, extra series 9.Google Scholar
Visser, F. Th. (1946, 1952). A Syntax of the English Language of St Thomas More. 2 vols. Louvain: Librairie Universitaire.Google Scholar
Visser, F. Th. (1963–1973). An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 3 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. F. (1982). Evidence for spoken regional English in the sixteenth century. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 5: 1–25.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. F. (1987). The treatment of dialect in English dictionaries. In Burchfield, R. W. (ed.). Studies in Lexicography. Oxford: Clarendon Press ,156–77.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. F. (1988). The phonology of South-Western English 1500–1700. In Fisiak, J.. (ed.). Historical Dialectology, Regional and Social. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter ,609–44.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. F. 2(1977). English Dialects. An Introduction. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. (1972). English Dialects: an Introduction. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Wald, Zachrissons BoktryckeriThe Complete Works of St Thomas More 14.2. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.
Waldron, R. A. (1967). Sense and Sense Development. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Wales, K. M. (1983). Thou and you in Early Modern English: Brown and Gilman revisited. Studia Linguistica 37: 107–25 Reprinted in Salmon, & Burness, (1987).Google Scholar
Walker, J. (1785).A Rhetorical Grammar. London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 266, 1971]Google Scholar
Walker, J. (1791). A critical pronouncing dictionary and expositor of the English language. London: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (1791). A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London: Robinson. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 117, 1968]Google Scholar
Wallerstein, R. C. (1935). The development of the rhetoric and meter of the heroic couplet, especially in 1625–1645. PMLA 50: 166–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, J. (1653). Grammatica linguae anglicanae. Oxford: L. Lichfield [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 142, 1969]Google Scholar
Wallis, J. (1653). Joannis Wallisii grammatica linguae anglicanae. 6th edn. London: William Bowyer. Ed & tr. J. A. Kemp (1972), John Wallis' Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wallis, J. (1653). Joannis Wallisii grammatica linguae anglicanae. Kemp, J. A. (ed.). (1972). John Wallis' Grammar of the English Language.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wallis, J. (1972 [1653]). Joannis Wallisi Grammatica linguæ anglicanse. Kemp, J. (ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ward, J. (1724). De ratione interpungendi. In Vossius, G. J.. Elementa rhetorica. London: Tooke & Motte ,49–90.Google Scholar
Warner, A. (1983). Review article: D. W. Lightfoot, Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 19: 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. (1990). Reworking the history of English auxiliaries. In Adamson, et al. (1990) ,537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, A. (1971). The styles of Sir Thomas Browne. In Fish, (1971) ,413–23.Google Scholar
Warren, B. (1992). Sense Developments: a Contrastive Study of the Development of Slang Senses and Novel Standard Senses in English (Stockholm Studies in English 80). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Wasserman, E. R. (1940). The return of the enjambed couplet. English Literary History 7 (3): 239–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. (ed.). (1962). Of Dramatic Poesy and Other Critical Essays by John Dryden. 2 vols. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (ed.). (1970). Literary English Since Shakespeare.Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, I. (1721). The Art of Reading and Writing English. London: Clark, Matthews & Ford. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 333, 1972]Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1789). Dissertations on the English Language: with Notes, Historical and Critical. Boston, MA: Isaiah Thomas. Reprinted (1951), Gainesville, FL: Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints.Google Scholar
Webster=Webster, J. (1623). The Works of John Webster.Lucas, F. L. (ed.). (1927). London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Weida, G. (1975). Der Gebrauch von ‘shall/should’ und ‘will/would’ in englischer Prosa am Ende des 16. Jahrhunderts.Augsburg: Blasaditsch GmbH.Google Scholar
Weinbrot, H. D. (1993). Britannia's Issue: The Rise of British Literature from Dryden to Ossian.Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, H. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, & Malkiel, (eds.) ,95–195.Google Scholar
Weinstock, H. (1976). The aims, problems and values of A Dictionary of Early Modern English Pronunciation 1500–1800. In DEMEP ,9–39.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1936). A History of Modern Colloquial English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. 3 vols. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, S. & Taylor, G. (1986). William Shakespeare: the Complete Works. Original spelling edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Welsted, L. (1724). Epistles, Odes etc.London: J. Walthoe & J. Peele.Google Scholar
Wermser, R. (1976). Statistische Studien zur Entwicklung des englischen Wortschatzes (Schweizer Anglistische Arbeiten 91). Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Whalley, J. I. (1969). English Handwriting 1540–1853. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Wharton, J. (1654). The English-Grammar. London: the Author. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 241, 1970]Google Scholar
White, J. (1761 [1969]). The English Verb: a Grammatical Essay.Menston: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Whythorne, T. (1961 [c. 1576]). The Autobiography. Osborn, J. M. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wiegand, N. (1982). From discourse to syntax: for in early English causal clauses. In Ahlqvist, A. (ed.). Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam: Benjamins ,385–93.Google Scholar
Wiegand, N. (1982). From discourse to syntax: for in Early English causal clauses. In Ahlqvist, (1982) ,385–93.Google Scholar
Wik, B. (1973). English Nominalizations in -ing Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Wikberg, K. (1975). Yes–no Questions and Answers in Shakespeare's Plays: a Study in Text Linguistics.Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (1668). An Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: Gellibrand. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 119, 1969]Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (1688). An Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. London: Gellibrand. [English Linguistics 1500–1800, Alston (1970. Menston: Scolar Press) 119, 1968]Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1955). Ovid Recalled.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1963). Golden Latin Artistry.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. (1976). Synaesthetic adjectives: a possible law of semantic change. Language 52: 461–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society.London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Williamson, G. (1935). The rhetorical pattern of neo-classic wit. Modern Philology 33: 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, G. (1951). The Senecan Amble: a Study in Prose Form from Bacon to Collier.London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. (1929). Colloquial Language of the Commonwealth and Restoration (The English Association Pamphlet 73). London.Google Scholar
Wilson =Wilson, T. (1553). The Arte of Rhetorique, for the Vse of All suche as are Studious of Eloquence, sette forth in English.London: R. Grafton.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D.. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua 87 (1–2): 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. M. (1963). The orthography and provenance of Henry Machyn. In Foote, P. & Brown, A. (eds.). Early English and Norse Studies. London: Methuen ,202–16.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. (1551). The Rule of Reason. London: R. Grafton.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. (1553). The Arte of Rhetorique. London: R. Graftonus [EE 206, 1969].Google Scholar
Wilson, T. [1553]. The Arte of Rhetorique. 1585 edn. Ed. Mair, G. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. (1941). The Prose Style of Samuel Johnson.Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. (1948). Philosophic Words: a Study of Style and Meaning in the ‘Rambler’ and ‘Dictionary’ of Samuel Johnson.Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. (1954). The Verbal Icon.University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Wölcken, F. (1957). Entwicklungsstufen der Wortbildung aus Initialen. Anglia 75: 317–33.Google Scholar
Wolfe, P. M. (1973). Linguistic Change and the Great Vowel Shift in English. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woods, S. (1985). Natural Emphasis. English Versification from Chaucer to Dryden.San Marino: The Huntington Library.Google Scholar
Workman, S. K. (1940). Fifteenth Century Translation as an Influence on English Prose.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, L. (1994). Sources of London English: Medieval Thames Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, L. (1995). Middle English {-ende} and {-ing}: a possible route to gram-maticalization. In Fisiak, J. (ed.) (1995) ,356–82.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1989a). Discourse, style and the rise of periphrastic do in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 10: 71–91.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1989b). On the stylistic basis of syntactic change. Folia Linguistica Historica 10: 93–115.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1994). The critic and the grammarians: Joseph Addison and the pre- scriptivists. In Stein, D. & Ostade, I. Tieken-Boon (eds.). Towards A Standard English 1600–1800.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter ,243–84.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1994a). The critic and the grammarians: Joseph Addison and the prescriptivists. In Stein, & Ostade, Tieken-Boon (1994) ,243–284.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1994b). The mystery of the modal progressive. In Kastovsky, (1994) ,467–485.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1997). Speaker innovation, textual revision and the case of Joseph Addison. In Nevalainen, & Kahlas-Tarkka, (1997) ,483–503.Google Scholar
Wurff, W. (1989). A remarkable gap in the history of English syntax. Folia Linguistica Historica 9: 117–59.Google Scholar
Wycherley=Wycherley, W. (a1716). The Complete Works of William Wycherley.Summers, M. (ed.). (1965). New York: Russell & Russell Inc.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1939). A History of Modern Colloquial English. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. 3(1936). A History of Modern Colloquial English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1923). Studies in English Rhymes from Surrey to Pope. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Yamada, M. (1971). The syntax of the ing-forms in Thomas Kyd. The Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, University of Shimane 5: 33–64.Google Scholar
Youmans, G. (1983). Generative tests for generative meter. Language 59 (1): 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zachrisson, R. E. (1914). Northern English or London English as the standard pronunciation. Anglia 38: 405–32.Google Scholar
Zachrisson, R. E. (1929). The Pronunciation of English Vowels 1400–1700. Göteborg: Wald, Zachrissons Boktryckeri A–B. [Reprinted 1971. New York: AMS Press.]Google Scholar
Zbierska-Sawala, A. (1993). Early Middle English Word-Formation: Semantic Aspects of Derivational Affixation in the AB Language (Bamberger Beiträge zur Englischen Sprachwissenschaft 32). Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, R. (1973). Structural change in the English auxiliary system on the replacement of be by have. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 107–17.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliographies
  • Edited by Roger Lass, University of Cape Town
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264761.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliographies
  • Edited by Roger Lass, University of Cape Town
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264761.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliographies
  • Edited by Roger Lass, University of Cape Town
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264761.010
Available formats
×