Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:20:44.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The world economy and the Cold War in the middle of the twentieth century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2010

Melvyn P. Leffler
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Odd Arne Westad
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Vice President Richard M. Nixon boasted about American color television to Nikita Khrushchev, the first secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, during their famous “kitchen debate” of July 1959, but the early Cold War was fought in black and white. The issues were monochrome and so were the images: stacks of Marshall Plan flour on an Italian wharf, C-47s approaching Tempelhof airport over the ruins of Berlin during the blockade, films of blast furnaces with white sparks emitted against a night sky, and the photos of the American vice president and the Soviet first secretary debating the path to household affluence in a Moscow exposition hall. At stake in that model American kitchen was consumer affluence or collective prowess, suburban dreams of the Eisenhower years versus Khrushchev’s cocky promise from 1956, “We will bury you,” rendered plausible a year later by the trail of Sputnik in the night sky.

Still, when Nixon and Khrushchev debated their societies’ respective achievements, they agreed that peaceful competition was preferable to ruthless military or political confrontation. Peaceful competition meant primarily economic competition: the rivalry between capitalism and state socialism. Divergent economic systems should not be so menacing that they compelled a strategic arms race; the two sides had not organized extensive alliances just to defend private or state ownership of capital, the market or the plan. Nonetheless, distinctions between socialism and capitalism seemed fundamental to ideological identity and to bloc cohesion in the 1950s, as they would again in the 1980s when the state socialist economies showed evident signs of decomposition. Neither were the distinctions just a source of ideological identity, no more than the stake of economic rivalry was just household appliances. The two economic systems had to provide the resources to sustain the military confrontation and subsidize allies. National power depended on economic achievement — a point the American vice president recognized when he conceded that the Soviets still led in getting payloads into orbit.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitz, Moses, “Economics of Growth,” in Moses Abramowitz, Thinking about Growth and Other Essays on Economic Growth and Welfare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accornero, Aris, Era il secolo del lavoro: come era e come cambia il grande protagonista del ’900 (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1997).Google Scholar
Domar, Evsey, “Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment,” Econometrica, 14 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, Till, Britain and the Economic Problem of the Cold War: The Political Economy and the Economic Impact of the British Defence Effort, 1945–1955 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar
Harrod, R. F., “An Essay in Dynamic Theory,” Economic Journal, 49 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, János, The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Charles S., In Search of Stability: Explorations in Historical Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Mazoyer, Marcel and Roudart, Laurence, Histoire des agricultures du monde: de néolithique à la crise contemporaine (Paris: Seuil, 1998).Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R., European Historical Statistics, 1750–1970, abridged ed. (London: Macmillan, 1978).Google Scholar
Sara Lorenzini, DueGermanie in Africa: la cooperazione allo sviluppo e la competizione per i mercati di materie prime e tecnologia (Florence: Edizioni Polistampa, 2003).Google Scholar
Stolper, Wolfgang F., The Structure of the East German Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tertrais, Hugues, La piastre et le fusil: le coût de la guerre d’Indochine 1945–1954 (Paris: Comité pour l’Histoire Économique et Financière de la France, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×