Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:25:27.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Nuclear weapons and the escalation of the Cold War, 1945–1962

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2010

Melvyn P. Leffler
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Odd Arne Westad
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Nuclear weapons are so central to the history of the Cold War that it can be dificult to disentangle the two. Did nuclear weapons cause the Cold War? Did they contribute to its escalation? Did they help to keep the Cold War “cold”? We should also ask how the Cold War shaped the development of atomic energy. Was the nuclear-arms race a product of Cold War tension rather than its cause?

The atomic bomb and the origins of the Cold War

The nuclear age began before the Cold War. During World War II, three countries decided to build the atomic bomb: Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union. Britain put its own work aside and joined the Manhattan Project as a junior partner in 1943. The Soviet effort was small before August 1945. The British and American projects were driven by the fear of a German atomic bomb, but Germany decided in 1942 not to make a serious effort to build the bomb. In an extraordinary display of scientific and industrial might, the United States made two bombs ready for use by August 1945. Germany was defeated by then, but President Harry S. Truman decided to use the bomb against Japan.

The decision to use the atomic bomb has been a matter of intense controversy. Did Truman decide to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order, as he claimed, to end the war with Japan without further loss of American lives? Or did he drop the bombs in order to intimidate the Soviet Union, without really needing them to bring the war to an end? His primary purpose was surely to force Japan to surrender, but he also believed that the bomb would help him in his dealings with Iosif V. Stalin. That latter consideration was secondary, but it confirmed his decision. Whatever Truman’s motives, Stalin regarded the use of the bomb as an anti-Soviet move, designed to deprive the Soviet Union of strategic gains in the Far East and more generally to give the United States the upper hand in defining the postwar settlement. On August 20, 1945, two weeks to the day after Hiroshima, Stalin signed a decree setting up a Special Committee on the Atomic Bomb, under the chairmanship of Lavrentii P. Beriia. The Soviet project was now a crash program.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyle, Peter G. (ed.), The Churchill–Eisenhower Correspondence 1953–1955 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorge, Danger and Survival: Choices about the Bomb in the First Fifty Years (New York: Random House, 1988).Google Scholar
Eden, Anthony, Full Circle (London: Cassell, 1960).Google Scholar
Fursenko, A. A. (ed.), Prezidium TsK KPSS 1954–1964, vol. I [The Presidium of the Central Committee of the CPSU 1954–1964] (Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2003).Google Scholar
Fursenko, Aleksandr and Naftali, Timothy, “One Hell of a Gamble”: Castro, Kennedy, and the Cuban Missile Crisis 1958–1964 (London: John Murray, 1997) –89.Google Scholar
Fursenko, Aleksandr and Naftali, Timothy, Khrushchev’s Cold War (New York: W. W. Norton, 2006) –45.Google Scholar
Goncharov, Sergei N., John Wilson Lewis, and Xue Litai, Uncertain Partners: Stalin, Mao, and the Korean War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993) –67.Google Scholar
Heikal, Mohammed, Sphinx and Commissar: The Rise and Fall of Soviet Influence in the Arab World (London: Collins, 1978).Google Scholar
Hewlett, Richard G. and Holl, Jack M., Atoms for Peace and War 1953–1961: Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Holloway, David, Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Horne, Alastair, Macmillan 1957–1986: Volume II of the Offcial Biography (London: Macmillan, 1989).Google Scholar
Khrushchev, N. S., Khrushchev Remembers, vol. I (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977).Google Scholar
Khrushchev, Sergei, Rozhdenie sverkhderzhavy: kniga ob otse [Birth of a Superpower: A Book about My Father] (Moscow: Vremia, 2000).Google Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn P., A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Lewis, David K., Convention: A Philosophical Study (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
May, Ernest R. (ed.), American Cold War Strategy: Interpreting NSC 68 (Boston, MA: Bedford Books, 1993).Google Scholar
Poole, Walter S., The History of the Joint Chiefs of Sta., vol. IV, 1950–1952 (Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1980) –62.Google Scholar
Riabev, L. D. (ed.), Atomnyi proekt SSSR: dokumenty i materialy, vol. II, Atomnaia bomba 1945–1954, book 1 [The Atomic Project of the USSR: Documents and Materials, vol. II, The Atomic Bomb 1945–1954, book 1] (Moscow: Nauka, 1999).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, David, “The Origins of Overkill: Nuclear Weapons and American Strategy, 1945–1960,” International Security, 7, 4 (Spring 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, Scott D., “SIOP-62: The Nuclear War Plan Brieffing to President Kennedy,” International Studies, 12, 1 (Summer 1987).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C., The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960), ch..Google Scholar
Stalin, I. V. to Molotov, V. M., Malenkov, G. M., Beriia, L. P., Mikoian, A. I., December 9, 1945, in Politburo TsK VKP(b) i sovet ministrov SSSR 1945–1953 [The Politburo of the Central Committee of the VKP(b) and the Council of Ministers of the USSR 1945–1953] (Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2002).Google Scholar
Torkunov, A. V., Zagadochnaia voina: koreiskii konfikt 1950–1953 godov [The Mysterious War: The Korean Confict 1950–1953] (Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2000), 46.Google Scholar
,US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1948, vol. I, pt. 2 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1975).
Vaïsse, Maurice, La grandeur: politique étrangère de général de Gaulle, 1958–1969 (Paris: Fayard, 1998) –25.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×