Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:05:38.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Universities

from PART I - WORKERS AND PLACES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2009

By
Jonathan Harwood
Edited by
Peter J. Bowler  and
John V. Pickstone
Peter J. Bowler
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast
John V. Pickstone
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Universities have been important to biology not merely by providing it with a home. Particular features of the university setting had a substantial impact on both the proliferation of new fields in the nineteenth century and the central questions that came to characterize those fields. The history of biological thought and practice must therefore make room for institutional history. Moreover, writing the history of “biology” poses particular problems. Unlike many subjects in the natural sciences (e.g., chemistry, physics) or the humanities (e.g., history, philosophy), “biology” has rarely been institutionalized as a single subject. Whenever the life sciences experienced growth within the universities, they displayed a remarkable tendency to be institutionalized separately rather than to remain together as an internally differentiated whole. Just why this has occurred is not clear, but its historiographical implication is that “biology” is best conceived as a collection of loosely connected areas of inquiry (I will call them “fields”) sharing little more than their concern with living organisms.

That said, the status that these fields have occupied within the university has varied considerably. Some of them (e.g., zoology or botany) were disciplines in the sense that they were central to the curriculum and were institutionalized in separate departments (or “institutes”) at most universities. But many fields were established for long periods of time without ever acquiring disciplinary status; for convenience, I will call them specialties (e.g., morphology, embryology, or cytology).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 90 - 107
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abir-Am, Pnina, “The Discourse of Physical Power and Biological Knowledge in the 1930s: A Reappraisal of the Rockefeller Foundation’s Policy in Molecular Biology,” Social Studies of Science, 12 (1982),CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, David Elliston, The Naturalist in Britain: A Social History (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978).Google Scholar
Allen, Garland, Life Science in the 20th Century (New York: Wiley, 1975);Google Scholar
Altman, D. W., Fryxell, Paul, and Harvey, Rosemary D., “S. C. Harland and Joseph B. Hutchinson: Pioneer Botanists and Geneticists Defining Relationships in the Cotton Genus,” Huntia, 9 (1993).Google Scholar
Amsterdamska, Olga, “Medical and Biological Constraints: Early Research on Variation in Bacteriology,” Social Studies of Science, 17 (1987);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, Kenneth, “Plant Pathology and Mycology,” in A Short History of Botany in the United States, ed. Ewan, Joseph (New York: Hafner, 1969).Google Scholar
Bateson, Beatrice, William Bateson, FRS, Naturalist (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Beatty, John, “Evolutionary Antireductionism: Historical Reflections,” Biology and Philosophy, 5 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G. D. H., “Frank Leonard Engledow, 1890–1985,” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 32 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneuil, Christophe, “Crafting and Disciplining the Tropics: Plant Science in the French Colonies,” in Science in the Twentieth Century, ed. Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique (Amsterdam: Harwood, 1997).Google Scholar
Brockway, Lucille, Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens (New York: Academic Press, 1979);Google Scholar
Burian, Richard, Gayon, Jean, and Zallen, Doris, “The Singular Fate of Genetics in the History of French Biology, 1900–1940,” Journal of the History of Biology, 21 (1988);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bynum, W. F. and Porter, Roy, eds., Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Cain, Joseph, “Common Problems and Cooperative Solutions: Organizational Activity in Evolutionary Studies, 1936–1947,” Isis, 84 (1993), at p. 21.Google ScholarPubMed
Cittadino, Eugene, “Ecology and the Professionalization of Botany in America, 1890–1905,” Studies in the History of Biology, 4 (1980).Google Scholar
Cittadino, Eugene, Nature as the Laboratory: Darwinian Plant Ecology in the German Empire, 1880–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990);Google Scholar
Clark, Paul, Pioneer Microbiologists of America (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1961), p..Google Scholar
Coleman, William and Holmes, Frederic, eds., The Investigative Enterprise: Experimental Physiology in 19th Century Medicine (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988);Google Scholar
Coleman, William, Biology in the 19th Century: Problems of Form, Function and Transformation (New York: Wiley, 1971);Google Scholar
Cooke, Kathy, “From Science to Practice, or Practice to Science? Chickens and Eggs in Raymond Pearl’s Agricultural Breeding Research, 1907–1916,” Isis, 88 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew and Williams, Percy, eds., The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992);Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989);Google Scholar
Dietrich, Michael, “Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution within Evolutionary Biology,” Journal of the History of Biology, 31 (1998).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisnerova, Vera, “Botanische Disziplinen,” in Geschichte der Biologie, 3rd ed., ed. Jahn, Ilse (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1998);Google Scholar
Engel, Michael, “Paradigmenwechsel und Exodus: Zellbiologie, Zellchemie und Biochemie in Berlin,” in Exodus von Wissenschaften aus Berlin: Fragestellungen, Ergebnisse, Desiderate, ed. Fischer, Wolfram et al. (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1994).Google Scholar
Eulner, Hans-Heinz, Die Entwicklung der medizinischen Spezialfaecher an den Universitaeten des deutschen Sprachgebietes (Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1970);Google Scholar
Gayon, Jean and Zallen, Doris, “The Role of the Vilmorin Company in the Promotion and Diffusion of the Experimental Science of Heredity in France, 1840–1920,” Journal of the History of Biology, 31 (1998).Google Scholar
Geison, Gerald, Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978)Google Scholar
Green, J. Reynolds, A History of Botany in the United Kingdom (London: Dent, 1914);Google Scholar
Harland, S. C., “William Lawrence Balls,” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 7 (1961).Google Scholar
Harwood, Jonathan, Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900–1933 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993);Google Scholar
Harwood, Jonathan, “National Styles in Science: Genetics in Germany and the United States between the World Wars,” Isis, 78 (1987);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, Joseph, “Sydney Cross Harland,” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 30 (1984).Google Scholar
Jahn, Ilse, Loether, Rolf, and Senglaub, Konrad, eds., Geschichte der Biologie: Theorien, Methoden, Institutionen und Kurzbiographien (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1982), p..Google Scholar
Jahn, Ilse, Grundzuege der Biologiegeschichte (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1990), p..Google Scholar
Judson, Horace, The Eighth Day of Creation: The Makers of the Revolution in Biology (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979);Google Scholar
Kamminga, Harmke and Weatherall, Mark, “The Making of a Biochemist I: Frederick Gowland Hopkins’ Construction of Dynamic Biochemistry,” Medical History, 40 (1996).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, Lily, The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rise of the New Biology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Barbara, “The American Breeders Association: Genetics and Eugenics in an Agricultural Context, 1903–1913,” Social Studies of Science, 13 (1983);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmelman, Barbara, “The Influence of Agricultural Practice on the Development of Genetic Theory,” Journal of the Swedish Seed Association, 107 (1997);Google Scholar
Kohler, Robert, Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900–1945 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991);Google Scholar
Kohler, Robert, From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Robert, Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), chap. 7;Google Scholar
Kohler, Robert, “Science and Philanthropy: Wickliffe Rose and the International Education Board,” Minerva, 23 (1985).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler, Robert, “Bacterial Physiology: The Medical Context,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 59 (1985);Google ScholarPubMed
Mitman, Gregg and Burkhardt, Richard, “Struggling for Identity: The Study of Animal Behavior in America, 1930–1945,” in The Expansion of American Biology, ed. Benson, Keith, Maienschein, Jane, and Rainger, Ronald (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Morrell, Jack, Science at Oxford, 1914–1939: Transforming an Arts University (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997) and chap. 7. The quotation is on p. 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathusius, Lilly, Theodor Roemer: Lebensabriss und bibliographischer Ueberblick (Halle: Universitaets- u. Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalts, 1955);Google Scholar
Nyhart, Lynn, Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995);Google Scholar
Olby, Robert, The Path to the Double Helix (London: Macmillan, 1974);Google Scholar
Olby, Robert, “Scientists and Bureaucrats in the Establishment of the John Innes Horticultural Institution under William Bateson,” Annals of Science, 46 (1989);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olby, Robert, Origins of Mendelism, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Overfield, Richard, Science with Practice: Charles E. Bessey and the Maturing of American Botany (Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1993), chap. 4;Google Scholar
Palladino, Paolo, “The Political Economy of Applied Research: Plant-Breeding in Great Britain, 1910–1940,” Minerva, 28 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, Philip, Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Pauly, Philip “General Physiology and the Discipline of Physiology, 1890–1935,” in Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940, ed. Geison, Gerald (Bethesda, Md.: American Physiological Society, 1987);Google Scholar
Pauly, Philip, “The Appearance of Academic Biology in Late 19th Century America,” Journal of the History of Biology, 17 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickstone, J. V., “Physiology and Experimental Medicine,” in Companion to the History of Modern Science, ed. Olby, R. C., Cantor, G. N., Christie, J. R. R., and Hodge, M. J. S. (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Pickstone, John V., “Science in Nineteenth-Century England: Plural Configurations and Singular Politics,” in The Organisation of Knowledge in Victorian Britain, ed. Daunton, Martin (published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Porter, Roy, The Making of Geology: Earth Sciences in Britain, 1660–1815 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977);Google Scholar
Porter, Roy, “Gentlemen and Geology: The Emergence of a Scientific Career, 1660–1920,” Historical Journal, 21 (1978);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, “Vertebrate Paleontology as Biology: Henry Fairfield Osborn and the American Museum of Natural History,” in The American Development of Biology, ed. Rainger, Ronald, Benson, Keith, and Maienschein, Jane (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, “Biology, Geology or Neither or Both: Vertebrate Paleontology at the University of Chicago, 1892–1950,” Perspectives on Science, 1 (1993);Google Scholar
Reif, Wolf-Ernst, “The Search for a Macroevolutionary Theory in German Paleontology,” Journal of the History of Biology, 19 (1986).Google Scholar
Ridley, Mark, “Embryology and Classical Zoology in Great Britain,” in A History of Embryology, ed. Horder, T. J., Witkowski, J. A., and Wylie, C. C. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Charles, No Other Gods: On Science and American Social Thought (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), chap. 9.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret, “The Organisation of the Agricultural Sciences,” in The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860–1920, ed. Oleson, A. and Voss, J. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979), at pp. 216–20;Google Scholar
Sapp, Jan, “The Struggle for Authority in the Field of Heredity, 1900–1932,” Journal of the History of Biology, 16 (1983).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobey, Ronald, Saving the Prairies: The Life Cycle of the Founding School of American Plant Ecology, 1895–1955 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981), chap. 5 and App. Table 4.Google Scholar
Trow, Martin, “Leadership and Organization: The Case of Biology at Berkeley,” in Higher Education Organization: Conditions for Policy Implementation, ed. Premfors, Rune (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1984).Google Scholar
Tuchman, Arlene, Science, Medicine and the State in Germany: The Case of Baden, 1815–1871 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993);Google Scholar
Turner, R. Steven, “The Growth of Professorial Research in Prussia, 1818–1848: Causes and Context,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Steven, Kerwin, E., and Woolwine, D., “Careers and Creativity in 19th Century Physiology: Zloczower Redux,” Isis, 75 (1984).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernon, Keith, “Pus, Beer, Sewage and Milk: Microbiology in Britain, 1870–1940,” History of Science, 28 (1990);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernon, Keith, “Desperately Seeking Status: Evolutionary Systematics and the Taxonomist’s Search for Respectability, 1940–1960,” British Journal for the History of Science, 26 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weindling, Paul, “The Rockefeller Foundation and German Biomedical Sciences, 1920–1940: From Educational Philanthropy to International Science Policy,” in Science, Politics and the Public Good: Essays in Honour of Margaret Gowing, ed. Rupke, N. (London: Macmillan, 1988);Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M., “History of the Bussey Institution,” in The Development of Harvard University since the Inauguration of President Eliot, 1869–1929, ed. Morison, Samuel E. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1930).Google Scholar
Wilson’s, E. O. insider account in his Naturalist (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1996), chap. 12.Google Scholar
Wright, A. H., “Biology at Cornell University,” Bios, 24 (1953);Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×