Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:15:01.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Theory of Chemical Structure and its Applications

from Part III - Chemistry and Physics: Problems Through the Early 1900s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Alan Rocke
Edited by
Mary Jo Nye
Mary Jo Nye
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

The theory of chemical structure was developed in the 1850s and 1860s, a product of the efforts of a number of leading European chemists. By the late 1860s it was regarded as a mature and powerful conceptual scheme that not only gave important insight into the details of molecular architecture in an invisibly small realm of nature, but also furnished heuristic guidance in the technological manipulation of those molecules, providing assistance in the creation of an important fine chemicals industry. The theory continued to develop in its power and subtlety throughout the following decades, until by the end of the century, it was by all measures the reigning doctrine of the science of chemistry, dominating investigations in both academic and industrial laboratories. Consequently, the story of the rise of this theory is an important component of the history of basic science, and also of the manner in which scientific ideas are applied to industry.

EARLY STRUCTURALIST NOTIONS

Speculations concerning geometrical groupings of the imperceptible particles that make up sensible bodies go back to the pre-Socratics. However, for our purposes, it is expedient to begin the story with the rise of chemical atomism, since structural ideas presuppose atoms in the modern chemical (post-Lavoisien) sense. The founder of the chemical atomic theory was John Dalton (1766–1844), and it is suggestive that immediately following the proposal of chemical atoms, Dalton and others began to speculate how they might be arranged into molecules (often then called “compound atoms”). As early as 1808 – about the time Dalton’s ideas first began to be known in the chemical community – William Wollaston was “inclined to think … that we shall be obliged to acquire a geometric conception of [the] relative arrangement [of the elementary atoms] in all the three dimensions of solid extension.”

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 255 - 271
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, A. A., Unsaturation in Organic Chemistry (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1968).Google Scholar
Beer, J. J., The Emergence of the German Dye Industry (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Benfey, O. T., From Vital Force to Structural Formulas (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1964).Google Scholar
Benfey, O. T., ed., Kekulé Centennial (Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berzelius, , “Experiments to Determine the Definite Proportions in Which the Elements of Organic Nature are Combined,” Annals of Philosophy, 5 (1815).Google Scholar
Berzelius, , “Ueber die Zusammensetzung der Weinsäure und Traubensäure,” Annalen der Physik, 2d ser., 19 (1830).Google Scholar
Brooke, John, “Berzelius, the Dualistic Hypothesis, and the Rise of Organic Chemistry,” in Enlightenment Science in the Romantic Era, ed. Melhado, E. and Frängsmyr, T. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Brooke, John, “Wöhler’s Urea, and its Vital Force? – A Verdict from the Chemists,” Ambix, 15 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, John, Thinking about Matter: Studies in the History of Chemical Philosophy (Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate, 1995).Google Scholar
Brooke, John, “Organic Synthesis and the Unification of Chemistry: A Reappraisal,” British Journal for the History of Science, 5 (1971).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooke, J., “Laurent, Gerhardt, and the Philosophy of Chemistry,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 6 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Nathan, “Alexander Butlerov and the Professionalization of Science in Russia,” Russian Review, 57 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bud, R. and Roberts, G., Science versus Practice: Chemistry in Victorian Britain (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Bykov, G. V., Istoriia klassicheskoi teorii khimicheskogo stroeniia (Moscow, Akademiia Nauk, 1960).Google Scholar
Bykov, G. V. is “K istoriografii teorii khimicheskogo stroeniia,” Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki, 4 (1982).Google Scholar
Couper, , “Sur une nouvelle theorie chimique,” Comptes rendus, 46 (1858).Google Scholar
Davy, , Elements of Chemical Philosophy (London, 1812).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deMilt, Clara, “Auguste Laurent, Founder of Modern Organic Chemistry,” Chymia, 4 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, J. B., “Memoire sur la loi des substitutions et la théorie des types,” Comptes Rendus, 10 (1840).Google Scholar
Farrar, W. V., “Dalton and Structural Chemistry,” in Cardwell, D., ed., John Dalton and the Progress of Science (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Fox, Robert, “Scientific Enterprise and the Patronage of Research in France,” Minerva, 11 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, R., “Science, Industry, and the Social Order in Mulhouse,” British Journal for the History of Science, 17 (1984).Google Scholar
Frankland, , “On a New Series of Organic Bodies Containing Metals,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 142 (1852).Google Scholar
Gay-Lussac, , “Recherches sur l’acide prussique,” Annales de chimie, 95 (1815), at.Google Scholar
Haber, L. F., The Chemical Industry During the Nineteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Harris, J. and Brock, W., “From Giessen to Gower Street: Towards a Biography of Alexander Williamson,” Annals of Science, 31 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Frederick L., “The Complementarity of Teaching and Research in Liebig’s Laboratory,” Osiris, 2d ser., 5 (1989).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornix, W. J., “A. W Hofmann and the Dyestuffs Industry,” in Die Allianz von Wissenschaft und Industry, ed. Meinel, C. and Scholz, H. (Weinheim: VCH Verlag, 1992).Google Scholar
Johnson, Jeffrey, “Academic Chemistry in Imperial Germany,” Isis, 76 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapoor, S., “The Origin of Laurent’s Organic Classification,” Isis, 60 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapoor, S., “Dumas and Organic Classification,” Ambix, 16 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kekulé, , Lehrbuch der organischen Chemie, 2 vols. (Erlangen: Enke, 1861–6).Google Scholar
Kekulé, , “On a New Series of Sulphuretted Acids,” Proceedings of the Royal Society, 7 (1854).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kekulé, , “Sur la constitution des substances aromatiques,” Bulletin de la Société Chimique, 2d ser., 3 (1865).Google Scholar
Kekulé, , “Ueber die Constitution und die Metamorphosen der chemischen Verbindungen und über die chemische Natur des Kohlenstoffs,” Annalen der Chemie, 106 (1858).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, , “Constructing Symbolic Spaces,” Ambix, 43 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Mi Gyung, “The Layers of Chemical Language II,” History of Science, 30 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Ursula, Nineteenth-Century Chemistry: Its Experiments, Paper-Tools, and Epistemological Characteristics (Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 1997).Google Scholar
Klosterman, Leo, “A Research School of Chemistry in the Nineteenth Century: Jean-Baptiste Dumas and His Research Students,” Annals of Science, 42 (1985).Google Scholar
Kolbe, , “Ueber den natürlichen Zusammenhang der organischen mit den unorganischen Verbindungen,” Annalen der Chemie, 113 (1860).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leprieur, F. and Papon, P., “Synthetic Dyestuffs: The Relations between Academic Chemistry and the Chemical Industry in Nineteenth-Century France,” Minerva, 17 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebig, , “Ueber die Constitution der organischen Säuren,” Annalen derPharmacie, 26 (1838).Google Scholar
Mauskopf, SeymourCrystals and Compounds: Molecular Structure and Composition in Nineteenth Century French Science (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1976).Google Scholar
Melhado, , Jacob Berzelius: The Emergence of His Chemical System (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Meyer-Thurow, G., “The Industrialization of Invention: A Case Study from the German Chemical Industry,” Isis, 73 (1982).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novitsky, MaryaAuguste Laurent and the Prehistory of Valence (Chur, Switzerland: Harwood, 1992).Google Scholar
Nye, Mary J., “Berthelot’s Anti-Atomism: A ‘Matter of Taste’?” Annals of Science, 31 (1981).Google Scholar
Odling, , “On the Constitution of Acids and Salts,” Journal of the Chemical Society, 7 (1854).Google Scholar
Partington, J. R., A History of Chemistry, vol. 4 (London: Macmillan, 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabkin, Y., “La chimie et le pétrole: Les débuts d’une liaison,” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, 30 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramberg, Peter, “Arthur Michael’s Critique of Stereochemistry,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 22 (1995).Google Scholar
Ramsay, ed., Van’t Hoff-LeBel Centennial (Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, O. B., Stereochemistry (London: Heyden, 1981).Google Scholar
Rocke, A. J., The Quiet Revolution: Hermann Kolbe and the Science of Organic Chemistry (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rocke, A. J., Chemical Atomism in the Nineteenth Century (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Rocke, A. J., “Kekulé, Butlerov, and the Historiography of the Theory of Chemical Structure,” British Journal for the History of Science, 14 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Colin, Edward Frankland: Chemistry, Controversy, and Conspiracy in Victorian London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Russell, C. A., The History of Valency (Leicester, England: Leicester University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Russell, C., “The Changing Role of Synthesis in Organic Chemistry,” Ambix, 34 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütt, W., “Guglielmo Koerner und sein Beitrag zur Chemie isomerer Benzolderivate,” Physis, 17 (1995).Google Scholar
Travis, Anthony, The Rainbow Makers (Bethlehem, Pa.: Lehigh University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Travis, A. S., Hornix, W. J., and Bud, R., eds., Organic Chemistry and High Technology, 1850–1950 (special issue of British Journal for the History of Science, March 1992).Google Scholar
Wetzel, Walter, Naturwissenschaft und chemische Industrie in Deutschland (Stuttgart: Steiner, 1991).Google Scholar
Williamson, , “On the Constitution of Salts,” Chemical Gazette, 9 (1851).Google Scholar
Williamson, , “Theory of Etherification,” Philosophical Magazine, 3d ser., 37 (1850).Google Scholar
Wöhler, and Liebig, , “Untersuchungen über das Radikal der Benzoesäure,” Annalen der Pharmacie, 3 (1832).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollaston, , “On Super-Acid and Sub-Acid Salts,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 98 (1808).Google Scholar
Wurtz, , “Théorie des combinations glycériques,” Annales de Chimie, 3d ser., 43 (1855).Google Scholar
y, E. and Gerhardt, C. Jr., Charles Gerhardt: Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa correspondance (Paris: Masson, 1900).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×