Homes and Households

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521572446.010

9 - Homes and Households

from Part II - Personae and Sites of Natural Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Alix Cooper

Edited by

Katharine Park and

Lorraine Daston

Show author details

Katharine Park: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Lorraine Daston: Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Where did early modern natural inquiry take place? Research by historians of science has begun to suggest that many of the activities crucial to the Scientific Revolution took place not only in such recognizably new and innovative sites as botanical gardens, anatomy theaters, laboratories, and the quarters of scientific societies but also – and often simultaneously – within the seemingly humble and prosaic spaces of natural inquirers’ own homes and households. These domestic spaces in fact saw the production of natural knowledge of all kinds, as their occupants used them as places not just to sleep but also to think, write, calculate, observe, and experiment on natural phenomena. Furthermore, while doing so, they frequently ended up enlisting household members in these projects. In this way, homes and households became crucial sites for the pursuit of natural knowledge in early modern Europe.

Few historians of science have paid attention to these kinds of “private” spaces. One of the main reasons for this is almost certainly the way in which, over the past several centuries, scientific work has gradually come to be conceptualized as occuring primarily outside the home. This particular assumption is itself a historical artifact, stemming from modern changes in the organization of work more broadly. During the nineteenth century in particular, as more and more people abandoned home-based workshops and began to travel to new places of employment, newly labeled “scientists” likewise increasingly came to work outside the home in institutional spaces that were perceived as religiously and emotionally neutral. In the process, considerable ideological boundaries were erected between work and family, and between public and private realms, which have continued to shape modern thinking.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 224 - 237

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572446.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Algazi, Gadi “Scholars in Households: Reconfiguring the Learned Habitus, 1400–1600,” Science in Context, 16 (2003).Google Scholar

Anderson, MichaelApproaches to the History of the Western Family, 1500–1914 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980).CrossRef Google Scholar

Bethke Elshtain, Jean ed., The Family in Political Thought (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Biagioli, MarioGalileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Blunt, Wilfrid and Stearn, William T., The Art of Botanical Illustration (Kew: Royal Botanic Garden, 1994).Google Scholar

Christianson, John R.On Tycho’s Island: Tycho Brahe and His Assistants, 1570–1601 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Cooper, Alix “‘The Possibilities of the Land’: The Inventory of ‘Natural Riches’ in the Early Modern German Territories,” in Oeconomies in the Age of Newton, ed. Schabas, Margaret and DeMarchi, Neil (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Cooper, Alix, “The Death of the Naturalist: The Labor of Posthumous Publication in Early Modern Natural History,” paper presented at the History of Science Society annual meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 1999.Google Scholar

Coulton Gillispie, CharlesDictionary of Scientific Biography, ed. (New York: Scribner, 1981).Google Scholar

Daumas, MauriceScientific Instruments of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, trans. and ed. Holbrook, Mary (New York: Praeger, 1972).Google Scholar

Dittrich, ErhardDie deutschen und österreichischen Kameralisten (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1973).Google Scholar

Dorinda, Outram “Before Objectivity: Wives, Patronage, and Cultural Reproduction in Early Nineteenth-Century French Science,” in Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Women in Science, 1789–1979, ed. Abir-Am, Pnina G. and Outram, Dirinda (New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Euler, Friedrich W. “Entstehung und Entwicklung deutscher Gelehrtengeschlechter,” in Universität und Gelehrtenstand, 1400–1800, ed. Rössler, Helmuth and Franz, Günther (Limburg: C. A. Starke Verlag, 1970).Google Scholar

Fairchilds, CissieDomestic Enemies: Servants and Their Masters in Old Regime France (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Findlen, Paula “Masculine Prerogatives: Gender, Space, and Knowledge in the Early Modern Museum,” in The Architecture of Science, ed. Galison, Peter and Thompson, Emily (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Fischer, HansJohann Jakob Scheuchzer (2. August 1672–23. Juni 1733), Naturforscher und Arzt (Zürich: Leemann, 1973).Google Scholar

Flandrin, Jean-LouisFamilies in Former Times, trans. Southern, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Goodman, DenaThe Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Guthrie, Leonard “The Lady Sedley’s Receipt Book, 1686, and other Seventeenth-Century Receipt Books,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 6 (1913).Google Scholar PubMed

Hannaway, Owen “Laboratory Design and the Aim of Science: Andreas Libavius versus Tycho Brahe,” Isis, 77 (1986).CrossRef Google Scholar

Harkness, Deborah “Managing an Experimental Household: The Dees of Mortlake and the Practice of Natural Philosophy,” Isis, 88 (1997).CrossRef Google Scholar

Heilbron, JohnPhysics at the Royal Society during Newton’s Presidency (Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1983).Google Scholar

Hevelius, JohannesMachinae coelestis (Danzig: Simon Reiniger, 1673).Google Scholar

Hufton, Olwen “Women Without Men: Widows and Spinsters in Britain and France in the Eighteenth Century,” Journal of Family History, 9 (1984).CrossRef Google Scholar

Hufton, OlwenThe Prospect Before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe, 1500–1800 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995).Google Scholar

Hunt, LynnThe Family Romance of the French Revolution (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Hunter, Lynette “Women and Domestic Medicine: Lady Experimenters, 1570–1620,” in Women, Science and Medicine, 1500–1700: Mothers and Sisters of the Royal Society, ed. Hunter, Lynette and Hutton, Sarah (Stroud: Sutton, 1997).Google Scholar

Jennett, Sean trans., Beloved Son Felix: The Journal of Felix Platter, a Medical Student in Montpellier in the Sixteenth Century (London: Muller, 1961).Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, Ernst H.The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1957).Google Scholar

Koerner, LisbetLinnaeus: Nature and Nation (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Kussmaul, AnnServants in Husbandry in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).CrossRef Google Scholar

Landes, Joan B.Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Le Roy Ladurie, Emmanuel, The Beggar and the Professor: A Sixteenth-Century Family Saga, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Loesel, JohannPlantas in Borussia sponte nascentes e manuscriptis Parentis mei divulgo (Königsberg: Menseniu, 1654).Google Scholar

MacDonald, A. A. “The Renaissance Household as Centre of Learning,” in Centres of Learning: Learning and Location in Pre-Modern Europe and the Near East, ed. Drijvers, Jan Willem and MacDonald, A. A. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995).Google Scholar

McIntosh, Marjorie “Servants and the Household Unit in an Elizabethan English Community,” Journal of Family History, 9 (1984).CrossRef Google Scholar

Mentzel, ChristianPinax botanonymos polyglottos katholikos (Berlin: Runge, 1682).Google Scholar

Miterauer, Michael and Sieder, Reinhard, The European Family: Patriarchy and Partnership from the Middle Ages to the Present, trans. Oosterveen, Karla and Hörzinger, Manfred (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Moran, Bruce T. ed., Patronage and Institutions: Science, Technology, and Medicine at the European Court, 1500–1750 (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Müller, Rainer, “Student Education, Student Life,” in Universities in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1800, ed. Ridder-Symoens, Hilde (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Murdin, LesleyUnder Newton’s Shadow: Astronomical Practices in the Seventeenth Century (Bristol: Adam Hilger, 1985).Google Scholar

O’Malley, C. D.Andreas Vesalius of Brussels, 1514–1564 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Ozment, StevenWhen Fathers Ruled: Family Life in Reformation Europe (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Paré, Ambroise, On Monsters and Marvels, trans. Pallister, Janis L. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Pinault, MadeleineThe Painter as Naturalist, trans. Sturgess, Philip (Paris: Flammarion, 1991).Google Scholar

Pollock, LindaWith Faith and Physic: The Life of Tudor Gentlewoman Lady Grace Mildmay, 1552–1620 (London: Collins and Brown, 1993).Google Scholar

Putti, VittorioBerengario da Carpi: Saggio biografico e bibliografico seguito dalla traduzione del “De fractura calvae sive cranei” (Bologna: L. Capelli, 1937).Google Scholar

Pycior, Helena M., Slack, Nancy G., and Abir-Am, Pnina G., eds., Creative Couples in the Sciences (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Schama, SimonThe Embarrassment of Riches (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Schiebinger, LondaThe Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Schullian, Dorothy M. “An Anatomical Demonstration by Giovanni Lorenzo of Sassoferrato, 19 November 1519,” in Miscellanea di scritti di bibliografia ed erudizione in memoria di Luigi Ferrari (Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1952).Google Scholar

Secord, James A. “Newton in the Nursery: Tom Telescope and the Philosophy of Tops and Balls,” History of Science, 23 (1985).CrossRef Google Scholar

Shackelford, Jole “Tycho Brahe, Laboratory Design and the Aim of Science: Reading Plans in Context,” Isis, 84 (1993).Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven “‘The Mind Is Its Own Place’: Science and Solitude in Seventeenth-Century England,” Science in Context, 4 (1990).Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England,” Isis, 79 (1988).CrossRef Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven “The Invisible Technician,” American Scientist, 77 (1989).Google Scholar

Shapin, StevenA Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Shorter, EdmundThe Making of the Modern Family (New York: Basic Books, 1975).Google Scholar

Shteir, Ann B.Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science: Flora’s Daughters and Botany in England, 1760 to 1860 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Small, Albion W.The Cameralists: The Pioneers of German Social Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1909).Google Scholar

Smith, Pamela H.The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, Pamela H.The Business of Alchemy: Science and Culture in the Holy Roman Empire (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Sobel, Dava, Galileo’s Daughter (New York: Penguin, 2000).Google Scholar

Steiger, RudolfJohann Jakob Scheuchzer (1672–1733). 1. Werdezeit (bis 1699) (Zürich: Leemann, 1927).Google Scholar

Stone, LawrenceThe Family, Sex, and Marriage in England, 1500–1800 (New York: Harper and Row, 1977).Google Scholar

Taylor, E. G. R.The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor and Stuart England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954).Google Scholar

Thornton, DoraThe Scholar in His Study: Ownership and Experience in Renaissance Italy (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Thrower, Norman J. W., Maps and Civilization: Cartography in Culture and Society, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Tribe, Keith “Cameralism and the Science of Government,” Journal of Modern History, 56 (1984).CrossRef Google Scholar

Wiesner, Merry E.Working Women in Renaissance Germany (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Witold, RybczynskiHome: A Short History of an Idea (London: Penguin, 1986).Google Scholar

Zemon Davis, Natalie, Women on the Margins: Three Seventeenth-Century Lives (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Zielengziger, KurtDie alten deutschen Kameralisten (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1914).Google Scholar