Aberdeen University Library. MS 2206/3/3. Aberdeen.Google Scholar

Ablondi, Fred 2005. Gerauld de Cordemoy: Atomist, Occasionalist, Cartesian. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Acosta, José de 1590. Historia natural y moral de las Indias. Seville: Juan de Leon.Google Scholar

Adams, Marcus P. 2016. “Hobbes on Natural Philosophy as ‘True Physics’ and Mixed Mathematics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adams, Robert Merrihew 1983. “Phenomenalism and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8: 217–257.Google Scholar

Adamson, Peter 2007. Al-Kindī. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adamson, Peter, and Pormann, Peter E. (eds.) 2012. The Philosophical Works of Al-Kindī. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adriaenssen, H. 2017. Representation and Scepticism from Aquinas to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aguilonius, Franciscus 1613. Opticorum libri sex philosophis iuxta ac mathematicis utiles. Antwerp.Google Scholar

Ahnert, Thomas 2004. “Newtonianism in Early Enlightenment Germany, c. 1720 to 1750: Metaphysics and the Critique of Dogmatic Philosophy,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35: 471–491.Google Scholar

Aiton, Eric J. 1972. The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motion. London: MacDonald.Google Scholar

Aiton, Eric J. 1975a. “The Elliptical Orbit and the Area Law,” Vistas in Astronomy 18: 573–583.Google Scholar

Aiton, Eric J. 1975b. “Kepler’s Ideas on Infinitesimals, Limits, and Continuity,” Vistas in Astronomy 18: 671–672.Google Scholar

Al-Haytham, 1972 [1572]. Opticae thesaurus: Alhazeni Arabis libris septem, nunc primum editi. New York: Johnson Reprint Company.Google Scholar

Al-Haytham, 1989. The Optics of Ibn Al-Haytham, Books I–II: On Direct Vision. Edited by Sabra, A. I.. 2 vols. London: The Warburg Institute.Google Scholar

Al-Kindī, 1975. “De radiis, edited by M-T. d’Alverny and F. Hudry,” Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 41: 141–259.Google Scholar

Alanen, Lilli 2003. Descartes’s Concept of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Alberti, Leon Battista 1991. On Painting. Edited by Grayson, Cecil. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Alexander, Peter 1985. Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles: Locke and Boyle on the External World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alexandrescu, Vlad 2007. “Descartes and Pascal on the Eucharist,” Perspectives on Science 15: 434–449.Google Scholar

Almási, Gábor 2014. “Rethinking Sixteenth-Century ‘Lutheran Astronomy’,” Intellectual History Review 24: 5–20.Google Scholar

Anfray, Jean-Pascal 2017. “Philosophie de l’esprit,” in Leduc, Christian, Laerke, Mogens, and Rabouin, David (eds.), Leibniz: Lectures et commentaires, Paris: Vrin, pp. 79–103.Google Scholar

Anonymous, 1676. Letters and Poems in Honour of the Incomparable Princess, Margaret, Dutchess of Newcastle. London: Thomas Newcombe.Google Scholar

Anonymous, 1890 [1612]. Considerazioni sopra il Discorso del Sig. Galileo Galilei intorno alle cose, che stanno in sù l’acqua, o che in quella si muovono, in Favaro, Antonio (ed.), Le opere di Galileo Galilei, Vol. 4, Florence: Barbéra, pp. 143–196.Google Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. 2000a. “Descartes’ Cardiology and its Reception in English Physiology,” in Gaukroger, Stephen, Schuster, John, and Sutton, John (eds.), Descartes’ Natural Philosophy, London: Routledge, pp. 420–444.Google Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. 2000b. The Philosophy of Robert Boyle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. 2002. “Robert Boyle and the Heuristic Value of Mechanism,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33: 157–170.Google Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. 2009. “The Experimental History of the Understanding from Locke to Sterne,” Eighteenth Century Thought 4: 143–169.Google Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. 2011a. “The Creation of the English Hippocrates,” Medical History 55: 457–478.Google Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. 2011b. John Locke and Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. 2014. “Philosophy of Experiment in Early Modern England: The Case of Bacon, Boyle and Hooke,” Early Science and Medicine 19: 103–132.Google Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. 2015. “Experimental Pedagogy and the Eclipse of Robert Boyle in England,” Intellectual History Review 25: 115–131.Google Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. (ed.) 2017. The Idea of Principles in Early Modern Thought: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Routledge Studies in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anstey, Peter R. 2018. “Bacon, Experimental Philosophy and French Enlightenment Natural History,” in Garrod, Raphaële and Smith, P. J. (eds.), Natural History in Early Modern France, Boston: Brill, pp. 205–240.Google Scholar

Anstey, Peter R., and Vanzo, Alberto 2012. “The Origins of Early Modern Experimental Philosophy,” Intellectual History Review 22: 499–518.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas 1963. Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics. Translated by R. J. Blackwell, R. J. Spath, and W. E. Thirlkel. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Arabatzis, Theodore, and Howard, Don 2015. “Special Issue: Integrated History and Philosophy of Science in Practice,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 50: 1–90.Google Scholar

Argenterio, Giovanni 1550. Varia opera de re medicum. Florence.Google Scholar

Argenterio, Giovanni 1592 [1566]. In Artem medicam Galeni, in Opera. Venice.Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger 1984. “Galileo’s Lunar Observations in the Context of Medieval Lunar Theory,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 15: 213–226.Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger 1986. “Descartes as Critic of Galileo’s Scientific Methodology,” Synthese 67: 77–90.Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger 1999. Descartes and the Last Scholastics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger 2001. “The Initial Response to Galileo’s Lunar Observations,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 32: 571–581.Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger 2011. Descartes among the Scholastics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger 2014. Descartes and the First Cartesians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger 2021. “Descartes and Logic: Perfecting the Ingenium,” in Raphaele, Garrod and Marr, Alexander (eds.), Descartes and the Ingenium: The Embodied Soul in Cartesianism, Leiden: Brill, pp. 31–46.Google Scholar

Aristotle, 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Armogathe, Jean-Robert 1977. Theologia cartesiana: L’explication physique de l’eucharistie chez Descartes et Dom Robert Desgabets. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine 1990. On True and False Ideas. Edited by Kremer, E. J.. Lewinston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre 1996. Logic or the Art of Thinking. Edited and translated by Buroker, Jill Vance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arthur, Richard T. W. 2006. “Animal Generation and Substance in Sennert and Leibniz,” in Smith, Justin E. H. (ed.), The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–174.Google Scholar

Ash, Eric H. 2004. Power, Knowledge, and Expertise in Elizabethan England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Aubenque, Pierre 2005 [1962]. Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. 5th ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Aubrey, John 1898. Brief Lives, Chiefly of Contemporaries, Set Down by John Aubrey, Between the Years 1669 & 1696. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Aucante, Vincent 2006. La philosophie medicale de Descartes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Austin, William H. 1970. “Isaac Newton on Science and Religion,” Journal of the History of Ideas 31: 521–542.Google Scholar

Averroës, 1986. De substantia orbis. Cambridge, MA and Jerusalem: The Medieval Academy of America and The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar

Ayers, Michael 1991. Locke. 2 vols. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Babeș, Ovidiu 2018. “Descartes and Roberval: The Composite Pendulum and its Center of Agitation,” Journal of Early Modern Studies 7: 123–150.Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston 1951. L’activité rationaliste de la physique contemporaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Backus, Irena 2016. Leibniz: Protestant Theologian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon, Francis 1626. Sylva Sylvarum, or A Naturall Historie. London: J. H. for William Lee.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis 1674. Of the Advancement and Proficience of Learning, or the Partitions of Sciences. Edited by Wats, Gilbert. London: For Thomas Williams.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis 1733. The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon. Edited by Shaw, Peter. 3 vols. London: For J. J. & P. Knapton.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis 1857–1874. The Works of Francis Bacon. Edited by Spedding, John, Ellis, Robert Leslie, and Heath, Douglas Denon. 14 vols. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis 1859. Sylva Sylvarum, in Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert Leslie, and Heath, Douglas Denon (eds.), The Works of Francis Bacon, Vol. 2, London: Longman, pp. 325–680.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis 1996–. The Oxford Francis Bacon. Edited by Serjeantson, Richard and Stewart, Alan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis 2000 [1620]. The New Organon. Edited by Jardine, Lisa and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis 2004. The Instauratio Magna. Part 2: Novum Organum and Associated Texts. Edited by Rees, Graham and Wakely, Maria. The Oxford Francis Bacon, Vol. 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis 2007. The Instauratio Magna. Part 3: Historia naturalis et experimentalis: Historia ventorum and Historia vitæ & mortis. Edited by Rees, Graham and Wakely, Maria. The Oxford Francis Bacon, Vol. 12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baglivi, Giorgio 1696. De praxi medica. Rome: Typis Dominici Antonii Herculis.Google Scholar

Baker, Thomas 1699. Reflections upon Learning. London: A. Bosvile.Google Scholar

Bakker, Paul J. M. 2007. “Natural Philosophy, Metaphysics, or Something in Between? Agostino Nifo, Pietro Pomponazzi, and Marcantonio Genua on the Nature and Place of the Science of the Soul,” in Bakker, Paul J. J. M. and Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H. (eds.), Mind, Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 151–178.Google Scholar

Baldini, Ugo 2003. “The Academy of Mathematics of the Collegio Romano from 1553 to 1612,” in Feingold, Mordechai (ed.), Jesuit Science and the Republic of Letters, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 47–98.Google Scholar

Baldini, Ugo, and Napolitani, Pier Daniele 1991. “Per una biografia di Luca Valerio. Fonti edite e inedite per una ricostruzione della sua carriera scientifica,” Bolletino di Storia delle Scienze Mathematiche 11: 3–157.Google Scholar

Baliani, Giovanni Battista 1666. “Della Filosofia Naturale, e suoi principii,” in Opere diverse, Genoa.Google Scholar

Barker, Peter 2008. “Stoic Alternatives to Aristotelian Cosmology: Pena, Rothmann, and Brahe,” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 61: 265–286.Google Scholar

Barker, Peter 2011. “The Reality of Peurbach’s Orbs: Cosmological Continuity in Fifteenth and Sixteenth Century Astronomy,” in Boner, Patrick J. (ed.), Change and Continuity in Early Modern Cosmology, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 7–32.Google Scholar

Barker, Peter, and Ariew, Roger (eds.) 1999. Revolution and Continuity: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Early Modern Science. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Barker, Peter, and Goldstein, Bernard R. 2016. “Theological Foundations of Kepler’s Astronomy,” Osiris 16: 88–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrera-Osorio, Antonio 2006. Experiencing Nature: The Spanish American Empire and the Early Scientific Revolution. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Barrow, Isaac 1685. Lectiones mathematicae XXIII, in quibus principia matheseôs generalia exponuntur. London.Google Scholar

Barrow, Isaac 1734. The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning Explained and Demonstrated: Being Mathematical Lectures Read in the Publick Schools at the University of Cambridge. Translated by John Kirkby. London: Stephen Austen.Google Scholar

Basson, Sebastien 1621. Philosophiae naturalis adversus Aristotelem libri XII. Geneva: Pierre de la Rouière.Google Scholar

Bates, Don 1998a. “Closing the Circle: How Harvey and His Contemporaries Played the Game of Truth, Part 1,” History of Science 36: 213–232.Google Scholar

Bates, Don 1998b. “Closing the Circle: How Harvey and His Contemporaries Played the Game of Truth, Part 2,” History of Science 36: 245–267.Google Scholar

Bates, Don 2000. “Machina Ex Deo: William Harvey and the Meaning of Instrument,” Journal of the History of Ideas 61: 577–593.Google Scholar

Bayer, Greg 1997. “Coming to Know Principles in Posterior Analytics II 19,” Apeiron 30: 109–142.Google Scholar

Bayon, H. P. 1939. “William Harvey, Physician and Biologist: His Precursors, Opponents and Successors,” Annals of Science 4: 329–389.Google Scholar

Bayon, H. P. 1947. “William Harvey (1578–1657): His Application of Biological Experiment, Clinical Observation, and Comparative Anatomy to the Problems of Generation,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 2: 51–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beeckman, Isaac 1939–1953. Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634. Edited by Cornelis, De Waard. 4 vols. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Bellis, Delphine 2017. “Nos in Diem Vivimus: Gassendi’s Probabilism and Academic Philosophy from Day to Day,” in Charles, Sébastien and Smith, Plínio Junqueira (eds.), Academic Skepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 125–152.Google Scholar

Bellis, Delphine 2018. “Imaginary Spaces and Cosmological Issues in Gassendi’s Philosophy,” in Bakker, Frederik, Bellis, Delphine, and Palmerino, Carla Rita (eds.), Space, Imagination and the Cosmos from Antiquity to the Early Modern Period, Cham: Springer, pp. 233–260.Google Scholar

Bellucci, Dino 1998. Science de la nature et Réformation: La physique au service de la Réforme dans l’enseignement de Philippe Mélanchthon. Rome: Edizioni Vivere.Google Scholar

Belot, Gordon 2011. Geometric Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Benedetti, Giovanni Battista 1554. Demonstratio proportionum motuum localium contra Aristotelem et omnes philosophos. Venice.Google Scholar

Benedetti, Giovanni Battista 1969 [1585]. Diversarum speculationum mathematicarum et physicarum liber, in Drake, Stillman and Drabkin, I. E. (eds.), Mechanics in Italy: Selections from Tartaglia, Benedetti, Guido Ubaldo & Galileo. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Benedict, Jim 2004. “Carpenter, Nathanael,” in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/4734.Google Scholar

Bennett, James A. 1980. “Robert Hooke as Mechanic and Natural Philosopher,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 35: 33–48.Google Scholar

Bennett, James A. 1986. “The Mechanics’ Philosophy and the Mechanical Philosophy,” History of Science 24: 1–28.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jim 2003. “Knowing and Doing in the Sixteenth Century: What Were Instruments For?,” British Journal for the History of Science 36: 129–150.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jim 2012. “Cosmography and the Meaning of Sundials,” in Biagioli, Mario and Riskin, Jessica (eds.), Nature Engaged: Science in Practice from the Renaissance to the Present, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 249–262.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan 1971. Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan 1984. A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan, and Remnant, Peter 1978. “How Matter Might at First be Made,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8: 1–11.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George 1975. “An Essay towards a New Theory of Vision,” in Philosophical Works; Including the Works on Vision, edited by Michael E. Ayers, London: Dent, pp. 7–70.Google Scholar

Bernoulli, Daniel 1746. “Nouveau problème de mécanique,” Mémoires de l’Académie des Sciences (Berlin) 1: 54–70.Google Scholar

Bernoulli, Jacob 1695. “Explicationes, annotationes et additiones ad ea quæ in actis sup. anni de curva elastica, isochrona paracentrica, & velaria, hinc inde memorata, & partim controversa leguntur; ubi de linea mediarum directionum, aliisque novis,” Acta Eruditorum: 537–553.Google Scholar

Bernoulli, Jacob 1703. “Démonstration générale du centre de balancement,” Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences: 78–84.Google Scholar

Bernoulli, Jean 1727. Discours sur les loix de la communication du mouvement. Paris: Claude Jombert.Google Scholar

Bernoulli, Johann 1710. “Extrait de la réponse de M. Bernoulli à M. Herman, datée de Basle le 7 Octobre 1710,” Mémoires de l’Académie des Sciences: 521–533.Google Scholar

Berryman, Sylvia 2002. “Galen and the Mechanical Philosophy,” Apeiron 35: 235–253.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico 1992. “Guidobaldo Dal Monte and the Archimedean Revival,” Nuncius 7: 3–34.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico 1993. Equivalence and Priority: Newton versus Leibniz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico 2006. Thinking with Objects: The Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico 2008. “The Collaboration between Anatomists and Mathematicians in the Mid-Seventeenth Century,” Early Science and Medicine 13: 665–709.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico 2011. Mechanism, Experiment, Disease: Marcello Malpighi and Seventeenth-Century Anatomy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico 2013. “Machines and the Body: Between Anatomy and Pathology,” in Gaillard, Aurélia, Goffi, Jean-Yves, Roukhomovsky, Bernard, and Roux, Sophie (eds.), L’Automate: modèle métaphore machine merveille, Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico 2019. Mechanism: A Visual, Lexical and Conceptual History. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Biagioli, Mario 1989. “The Social Status of Italian Mathematicians, 1450–1600,” History of Science 27: 41–94.Google Scholar

Biagioli, Mario 2003. “Stress in the Book of Nature: the Supplemental Logic of Galileo’s Realism,” MLN 118: 557–585.Google Scholar

Biancani, Giuseppe 1996 [1615]. Aristotelis loca mathematica, translated by G. Klima, in Mancosu, Paolo, Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 178–212.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Lorenzo 1996. Rinascimento e libertinismo: Studi su Gabriel Naudé. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Luca 2007. “Continuity and Change in the Aristotelian Tradition,” in Hankins, James (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49–71.Google Scholar

Biener, Zvi 2004. “Galileo’s First New Science: The Science of Matter,” Perspectives on Science 12: 262–287.Google Scholar

Biener, Zvi 2016. “Hobbes on the Order of Sciences: A Partial Defense of the Mathematization Thesis,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 54: 312–332.Google Scholar

Biener, Zvi 2017. “De gravitatione Reconsidered: The Changing Significance of Experimental Evidence for Newton’s Metaphysics of Space,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55: 583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biener, Zvi, and Schliesser, Eric (eds.) 2014. Newton and Empiricism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bigotti, Fabrizio 2017. “A Previously Unknown Path to Corpuscularism in the Seventeenth Century: Santorio’s Marginalia to the Commentaria in Primam Fen Primi Libri Canonis Avicennae (1625),” Ambix 64: 29–42.Google Scholar

Birch, Thomas 1756–1757. A History of the Royal Society of London. 4 vols. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar

Biswas, Margaret R., and Biswas, Asit K. 2008. “Palissy, Bernard,” in Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. 10, Detroit: Charles Scribner’s Sons, pp. 280–281.Google Scholar

Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie 1990. Le principe de vie chez Descartes. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie 2000. “Descartes, Reader of Harvey: The Discovery of the Circulation of Blood in Context,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 22: 15–40.Google Scholar

Blair, Ann 1993. “Teaching of Natural Philosophy in Seventeenth-Century Paris: The Case of Jean Cécile Frey,” History of Universities 12: 95–158.Google Scholar

Blair, Ann 1994. “Tradition and Innovation in Early Modern Natural Philosophy: Jean Bodin and Jean-Cécile Frey,” Perspectives on Science 2: 428–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blank, Andreas 2005. Leibniz: Metaphilosophy and Metaphysics, 1666–1686. Munich: Philosophia.Google Scholar

Blank, Andreas 2007. “Composite Substance, Common Notions, and Kenelm Digby’s Theory of Animal Generation,” Science in Context 20: 1–20.Google Scholar

Blank, Andreas 2010. Biomedical Ontology and the Metaphysics of Composite Substances: 1540–1670. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar

Blay, Michel 1994. “History of Science and History of Mathematization: The Example of the Science of Motion at the Turn of the 17th and 18th Centuries,” in Gavroglu, Kostas, Christianidis, Jean, and Nicolaidis, Efthymios (eds.), Trends in Historiography of Science, Boston: Kluwer, pp. 405–420.Google Scholar

Blay, Michel 1998. Reasoning with the Infinite: From the Closed World to the Mathematical Universe. Translated by M. B. DeBevoise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bloch, Olivier-René 1971. La philosophie de Gassendi. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Blum, Paul Richard 1988. “Der Standardkurs Der Katholischen Schulphilosophie im 17. Jahrundert,” in Kessler, Eckhard, Lohr, Charles H., and Sparn, Walter (eds.), Aristotelismus und Renaissance. In Memoriam Charles B. Schmitt, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, pp. 127–148.Google Scholar

Blum, Paul Richard 1992. “Qualitates occultae: Zur philosophischen Vorgeschichte eines Schlüsselbegriffs zwischen Okkultismus und Wissenschaft,” in Buck, August (ed.), Die okkulten Wissenschaften in der Renaissance, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar

Blum, Paul Richard 2012a. Giordano Bruno: An Introduction. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Blum, Paul Richard 2012b. Studies on Early Modern Aristotelianism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Boas, Marie 1949. “Hero’s Pneumatica: A Study of Its Transmission and Influence,” Isis 40: 38–48.Google Scholar

Boas, Marie 1952. “The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy,” Osiris 10: 412–541.Google Scholar

Bodéüs, Richard 1991. “Leibniz, Jean de Raey et la physique reformée,” Studia Leibnitiana 23: 103–10.Google Scholar

Bodmer Foundation. MS Bodmer.Google Scholar

Boenke, Michaela 2018. “Bernardino Telesio,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/telesio/.Google Scholar

Bondi, Roberto 2018. Il primo dei moderni: Filosofia e scienza in Bernardino Telesio. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar

Boner, Patrick J. 2007. “Kepler v. the Epicureans,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 38: 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boner, Patrick J. 2013. Kepler’s Cosmological Synthesis: Astrology, Mechanism and the Soul. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Booth, Sara Elizabeth, and Albert, van Helden 2000. “The Virgin and the Telescope: The Moons of Cigoli and Galileo,” Science in Context 13: 463–486.Google Scholar

Bordiga, Giovanni 1985. Giovanni Battista Benedetti. Venice: Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti.Google Scholar

Borel, Pierre 1655. De vero telescopii inventore. The Hague.Google Scholar

Borghero, Carlo 2011. Les Cartésiens face à Newton: philosophie, science et religion dans la première moitié du XVIIIe siècle. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Borrelli, Arianna 2020. “Giovan Battista Della Porta’s Construction of Pneumatic Phenomena and his Use of Recipes as Heuristic Tools,” Centaurus 62: 406–424.Google Scholar

Bos, Henk J. M. 1974. “Differentials, Higher-Order Differentials and the Derivative in the Leibnizian Calculus,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 14: 1–90.Google Scholar

Bos, Henk J. M. 1993. Lectures in the History of Mathematics. Providence: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar

Bos, Henk J. M. 1998. “La structure de la Géométrie de Descartes,” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 51: 291–318.Google Scholar

Bos, Henk J. M. 2001. Redefining Geometrical Exactness: Descartes’ Transformation of the Early Modern Concept of Construction. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Boschiero, Luciano 2007. Experiment and Natural Philosophy in Seventeenth-Century Tuscany. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Boudri, Johann Christiaan 2002. What was Mechanical about Mechanics: The Concept of Force between Metaphysics and Mechanics from Newton to Lagrange. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourne, William 1578. Inventions or Devices: Very Necessary for all Generalles and Captaines, or Leaders of Men, as well by Sea as by Land. London.Google Scholar

Bowen, Alan C. 2007. “The Demarcation of Physical Theory and Astronomy by Geminus and Ptolemy,” Perspectives on Science 15: 327–358.Google Scholar

Boyer, Carl 1959. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 1672. An Essay about the Origine & Virtues of Gems. London: William Godbid.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 1684. Memoirs for the Natural History of Humane Blood. London: Samuel Smith.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 1688. A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things: wherein it is inquir’d, whether, and (if at all) with what cautions, a naturalist should admit them. London: John Taylor.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 1772a [1666]. The Origine of Formes and Qualities, in The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, Vol. 3. London: W. Johnston et al., pp. 1–112.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 1772b. The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle. 6 vols. London: Printed for J. and F. Rivington.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 1999a [1672]. An Hydrostatic Discourse Occasioned by the Objections of the Learned Dr. Henry More. Edited by Hunter, Michael and Davis, Edward B.. The Works of Robert Boyle, Vol. 7. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 1999b [1666–1667]. The Origine of Forms and Qualities. Edited by Hunter, Michael and Davis, Edward B.. The Works of Robert Boyle, Vol. 5. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 1999c [1661]. The Sceptical Chymist. Edited by Hunter, Michael and Davis, Edward B.. The Works of Robert Boyle, Vol. 2. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 1999–2000. The Works of Robert Boyle. Edited by Hunter, Michael and Davis, Edward. 14 vols. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 2001. The Correspondence of Robert Boyle. Edited by Hunter, Michael, Clericuzio, Antonio, and Principe, Lawrence M.. 6 vols. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 2004. Royal Society Boyle Papers, in Hunter, Michael (ed.), Boyle Papers Online. http://www.bbk.ac.uk/boyle/papers/introduction.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 2005. Unpublished Material Relating to Robert Boyle’s Memoirs for the Natural History of Human Blood. Edited by Hunter, Michael and Knight, Harriet. London: Birkbeck, University of London.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert 2008. The Text of Robert Boyle’s “Designe about Natural History”. Edited by Hunter, Michael and Anstey, Peter R.. London: Birkbeck, University of London.Google Scholar

Brackenridge, J. Bruce 1995. The Key to Newton’s Dynamics: The Kepler Problem and the Principia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bradbury, S., and Turner, G. l’E. (eds.) 1967. Historical Aspects of Microscopy. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar

Brading, Katherine 2011. “On Composite Systems: Descartes, Newton, and the Law-Constitutive Approach,” in Jalobeanu, Dana and Anstey, Peter R. (eds.), Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion, New York: Routledge, pp. 130–152.Google Scholar

Brahe, Tycho 1573. De nova et nullius aevi memoria prius visa stella. Hven.Google Scholar

Breger, Herbert 1986. “Leibniz’ Einführung des Transzendenten,” Studia Leibnitiana 14: 119–132.Google Scholar

Breger, Herbert 2008. “The Art of Mathematical Rationality,” in Dascal, Marcelo (ed.), Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?, New York: Springer, pp. 141–152.Google Scholar

Brenz, Johannes 1590. Opera. Vol. 8. Tübingen: Gruppenbach.Google Scholar

Brioist, Pascal 2009. “‘Familiar Demonstrations in Geometry’: French and Italian Engineers and Euclid in the Sixteenth Century,” History of Science 47: 1–26.Google Scholar

Broad, Jacqueline 2003. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brockliss, Lawrence W. B. 1995. “Descartes, Gassendi and the Reception of the Mechanical Philosophy in the French Collèges de Plein Exercice, 1640–1730,” Perspectives on Science 3: 450–479.Google Scholar

Brown, Deborah J. 2011. “Cartesian Functional Analysis,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90: 75–92.Google Scholar

Brown, Gregory 1984. “‘Quod ostendendum susceperamus?’ What did Leibniz Undertake to Show in Brevis Demonstratio?,” Leibniz’ Dynamica, Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 13: 122–137.Google Scholar

Brown, Harcourt 1934. Scientific Organizations in Seventeenth-Century France (1620–1680). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Brown, Theodore M. 1977. “Physiology and the Mechanical Philosophy in Mid-Seventeenth Century England,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 51: 25–54.Google Scholar

Bruno, Giordano 1591. “De innumerabilibus, immenso et infigurabili, seu de universo et mundis libri octo,” in De monade, numero et figura liber, Frankfurt: Apud Ioannem Uvechelum et Petrum Fischerum, pp. 147–654.Google Scholar

Bruno, Giordano 1879–1891. Opera latine conscripta. Edited by Fiorentino, Francesco, Tocco, Felice, and Vitelli, G.. 3 vols. Naples: Apud Dom. Morano.Google Scholar

Bruno, Giordano 1962 [1588]. Camoeracensis acrotismus, in Opera latine conscripta, Vol. 1–1. Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: Frommann, 53–190.Google Scholar

Bruno, Giordano 2006. De l’infini, de l’univers et des mondes. Translated by Giovanni Aquilecchia, Jean Seidengart, Pierre Cavaillé, Miguel Ángel Granada, and Zaira Sorrenti. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Bucciantini, Massimo, Camerota, Michele, and Giudice, Franco 2015. Galileo’s Telescope: A European Story. Translated by Catherine Bolton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Buccolini, Claudio 2013. “Mersenne, Translator of Bacon?,” Journal of Early Modern Studies 2: 33–59.Google Scholar

Buffon, Georges-Louis Leclerc 1749–1789. Histoire naturelle générale et particulière. 36 vols. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar

Burnett, D. Graham 2005. Descartes and the Hyperbolic Quest: Lens Making Machines and their Significance in the Seventeenth Century. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar

Burtt, Edwin Arthur 1924. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Büttner, Jochen 2017. “Shooting with Ink,” in Valleriani, Matteo (ed.), The Structures of Practical Knowledge, Cham: Springer, pp. 115–166.Google Scholar

Büttner, Jochen 2019. Swinging and Rolling: Unveiling Galileo’s Unorthodox Path from a Challenging Problem to a New Science. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Büttner, Jochen, Damerow, Peter, Renn, Jürgen, and Schemmel, Matthias 2003. “The Challenging Images of Artillery. Practical Knowledge at the Roots of the Scientific Revolution,” in Wolfgang, Lefèvre, Renn, Jürgen, and Schoepflin, Urs (eds.), The Power of Images in Early Modern Science, Basle: Birkhäuser, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1973. “The Growth of Harvey’s De motu cordis,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 47: 427–470.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1977. “De motu cordis: Written in Two Stages: Response,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 51: 140–150.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1978. “William Harvey: A Conventional Medical Revolutionary,” Journal of the American Medical Association 239: 1295–1298.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1979a. “The Medical Side of Harvey’s Discovery,” in William Harvey and His Age: The Professional and Social Context of the Discovery of the Circulation, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 28–102.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1979b. “The School of Padua: Humanistic Medicine in the Sixteenth Century,” in Webster, Charles (ed.), Health, Medicine, and Mortality in the Sixteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335–370.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1981. “Harvey, William,” in Gillispie, Charles Coulston (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. 6, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, pp. 150–162.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1982. “Boyle and Harvey on the Valves in the Veins,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 5: 351–357.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, Jerome J., and Pagel, Walter 1971. “The Chequered Career of Galen’s Doctrine on the Pulmonary Veins,” Medical History 15: 211–229.Google Scholar

Cabeo, Niccolò 1646. In quatuor libros Meteorologicorum Aristotelis commentaria, et quaestiones. Rome.Google Scholar

Calcagnini, Celio 1544. “Quod caelum stet, Terra moveatur vel de perenni motu Terrae,” in Opera aliquot, Basle: Froben, pp. 388–395.Google Scholar

Calder, I. R. F. 1952. John Dee Studied as an English Neoplatonist. PhD dissertation. London: The Warburg Institute.Google Scholar

Calinger, Ronald S. 2016. Leonhard Euler. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cally, Pierre 1683. Primum philosophiae perficiendae rudimentum, anthropologia, sive tractatio de homine. Caen: Jean Cavelier.Google Scholar

Cally, Pierre 1695. Universae philosophiae institutio. Tomus primus. Caen: Jean Cavelier.Google Scholar

Calvin, Jean 1551. Commentarii in Isaiam prophetam. Geneva: Crispinus.Google Scholar

Calvin, Jean 1553. Institutiones Christianae religionis. Geneva: Stephanus.Google Scholar

Camerota, Michele, and Helbing, Mario O. 2000. “Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo’s De motu antiquiora and the Quaestiones de motu elementorum of the Pisan Professors,” Early Science and Medicine 5: 319–366.Google Scholar

Campanella, Tommasso 1622. Apologia pro Galileo. Frankfurt: Impensis Godefridi Tampachii, Typis Erasmi Kempfferi.Google Scholar

Campanella, Tommasso 1637. Dialectica. Paris: Tussan Dubray.Google Scholar

Campanella, Tommasso 1981. La cittá del sole: dialogo poetico/The City of the Sun: A Poetical Dialogue. Translated by Daniel J. Donno. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Campanella, Tommasso 1994. A Defense of Galileo The Mathematician from Florence. Translated by Richard J. Blackwell. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Caparrini, Sandro, and Fraser, Craig 2013. “Mechanics in the Eighteenth Century,” in Buchwald, Jed Z. and Fox, Robert (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 358–405.Google Scholar

Capecchi, Danilo 2018. The Path to Post-Galilean Epistemology. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Čapek, Milic (ed.) 1976. The Concepts of Space and Time. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Capivaccio, Girolamo 1603. Opera omnia. Frankfurt: Jona Rhodio.Google Scholar

Capozzi, Mirella, and Roncaglia, Gino 2009. “Logic and Philosophy of Logic from Humanism to Kant,” in Haaparanta, Leila (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 78–158.Google Scholar

Cardano, Girolamo 1966 [1663]. Opera omnia. Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: Frommann.Google Scholar

Carey, Daniel 1997. “Compiling Nature’s History: Travellers and Travel Narratives in the Early Royal Society,” Annals of Science 54: 269–292.Google Scholar

Carriero, John 1990. “Newton on Space and Time: Comments on J. E. McGuire,” in Bricker, Philip and Hughes, R. I. G. (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–134.Google Scholar

Carriero, John 2009. Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes’s Meditations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, Richard B. 1983. Descartes’ Medical Philosophy: The Organic Solution to the Mind-Body Problem. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Carugo, Adriano 1984. “L’insegnamento della matematica all’Università di Padova prima e dopo Galileo,” Storia della Cultura Veneta 4: 151–199.Google Scholar

Cassan, Elodie 2015. Les chemins cartésiens du jugement. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar

Catena, Pietro 1563. Oratio pro idea methodi. Padua: apud Gratiosum Perchacinum.Google Scholar

Cavaillé, Jean-Pierre 2009. “Libérer le libertinage: Une catégorie à l’épreuve des sources,” Annales 46(1): 45–78.Google Scholar

Cavaillé, Jean-Pierre 2012. “Libertine and Libertinism: Polemic Uses of the Terms in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century English and Scottish Literature,” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 12: 12–36.Google Scholar

Cavendish, Margaret 1668. Grounds of Natural Philosophy. London.Google Scholar

Cavendish, Margaret 2001. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. Edited by O’Neill, Eileen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Alan 1993. “The Lack of Excellency of Boyle’s Mechanical Philosophy,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24: 541–564.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Alan 2002. “Experiment versus Mechanical Philosophy in the Work of Robert Boyle: A Reply to Anstey and Pyle,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43: 191–197.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Alan 2010. “Boyle and the Origins of Modern Chemistry: Newman Tried in the Fire,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41: 1–10.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Alan 2011. “Understanding Science Through Its History: A Response to Newman,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42: 150–153.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Alan 2012. “Intermediate Causes and Explanations: The Key to Understanding the Scientific Revolution,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43: 551–562.Google Scholar

Charleton, Walter 1650. A Ternary of Paradoxes of the Magnetick Cure of Wounds. Nativity of Tartar in Wine. Image of God in Man. Written originally by Joh. Bapt. Van Helmont, and Translated, Illustrated and Amplified by Walter Charleton. London.Google Scholar

Charleton, Walter 1654. Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana, or, A fabrick of science natural, upon the hypothesis of atoms founded by Epicurus. London: Thomas Newcomb for Thomas Heath.Google Scholar

Charleton, Walter 1966 [1654]. Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana, Or, a Fabrick of Science Natural, Upon the Hypothesis of Atoms. New York: Johnson Reprint Company.Google Scholar

Chauvin, Étienne 1692. Lexicon rationale sive thesaurus philosophicus ordine alphabetico digestus. Rotterdam: Peter Slaart.Google Scholar

Chauvin, Étienne 1713. Lexicon philosophicum … novum opus. Leeuwarden.Google Scholar

Childrey, Joshua 1667. Histoire des singularitéz naturelles, d’Angleterre. Translated by Pierre Briot. Paris: Robert de Ninville.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 2009. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Christie, James E. 2019. From Influence to Inhabitation: The Transformation of Astrobiology in the Early Modern Period. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Cifoletti, Giovanna 1996. “The Creation of the History of Algebra in the Sixteenth Century,” in Goldstein, Catherine, Gray, Jeremy, and Ritter, Jim (eds.), L’Europe mathématique: histoires, mythes, identités, Paris: Edition de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 123–144.Google Scholar

Claessens, Guy 2009. “Clavius, Proclus, and the Limits of Interpretation: Snapshot-Idealization versus Projectionism,” History of Science 47: 317–336.Google Scholar

Clarke, Desmond M. 1982. Descartes’ Philosophy of Science. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, Desmond M. 1989. Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy under Louis XIV. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, Samuel 1705. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God. London.Google Scholar

Clarke, Samuel, and Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1717. A Collection of Papers, which passed between the late learned Mr. Leibnitz, and Dr. Clarke, in the years 1715 and 1716. Edited by Clarke, Samuel. London.Google Scholar

Clauberg, Johannes 1691. Opera omnia philosophica. Edited by Schalbruchii, J. T.. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Blaev.Google Scholar

Clave, Estienne de 1635. Paradoxes ou traittez philosophiques des pierres et pierreries contre l’opinion vulgaire. Paris: Pierre Chevalier.Google Scholar

Clavius, Christoph 1585. In sphaeram Ioannis de Sacro Bosco commentarius. 3rd ed. Rome: Basa.Google Scholar

Clericuzio, Antonio 1990. “A Redefinition of Boyle’s Chemistry and Corpuscular Philosophy,” Annals of Science 47: 561–589.Google Scholar

Clericuzio, Antonio 2000. Elements, Principles and Corpuscles: A Study of Atomism and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Clough, David 2009. “The Anxiety of the Human Animal: Martin Luther on Non-human Animals and Human Animality,” in Deane-Drummond, Celia and Clough, David (eds.), Creaturely Theology: On God, Humans and other Animals, London: SCM Press, pp. 41–60.Google Scholar

Clucas, Stephen 2001. “Corpuscular Theories in the Northumberland Circle,” in Lüthy, Christoph H., Murdoch, John E., and Newman, William R. (eds.), Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, Leiden: Brill, pp. 181–207.Google Scholar

Clucas, Stephen 2005. “Joanna Stephens’s Medicine and the Experimental Philosophy,” in Zinsser, Judith P. (ed.), Men, Women and the Birthing of Modern Science, DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, pp. 141–158.Google Scholar

Clucas, Stephen 2010. “Scientia and Inductio Scientifica in the Logica Hamburgensis of Joachim Jungius,” in Sorell, Tom, Rogers, G. A., and Kraye, Jill (eds.), Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 52–70.Google Scholar

Clucas, Stephen (ed.) 2011. Magic, Memory, and Natural Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Farnham: Ashgate Variorum.Google Scholar

Clulee, Nicholas H. 1977. “Astrology, Magic, and Optics: Facets of John Dee’s Early Natural Philosophy,” Renaissance Quarterly 30: 632–680.Google Scholar

Clulee, Nicholas H. 1988. John Dee’s Natural Philosophy: Between Science and Religion. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cockburn, Catharine Trotter 2006. “Remarks upon Some Writers in the Controversy concerning the Foundation of Moral Virtue and Moral Obligation,” in Sheridan, Patricia (ed.), Catharine Trotter Cockburn: Philosophical Writings, Peterborough: Broadview Press, pp. 87–146.Google Scholar

Cohen, H. Floris 1994. The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard 1966. Franklin and Newton: An Inquiry into Speculative Newtonian Experimental Science and Franklin’s Work in Electricity as an Example Thereof. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard 1985. Revolution in Science. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard, Duffin, K. E., and Strickland, Stuart (eds.) 1990. Puritanism and the Rise of Modern Science: The Merton Thesis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Harry 2008. “Actors’ and Analysts’ Categories in the Social Analysis of Science,” in Meusburger, Peter, Welker, Michael, and Wunder, Edgar (eds.), Clashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion, New York: Springer, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar

Colombo, Realdo 1559. De re anatomica libri XV. Venice: Nicolai Beuilacquae.Google Scholar

Commandino, Federico 1558. Archimedis opera non nulla. Venice.Google Scholar

Comte, Auguste 1835. Cours de philosophie positive. Vol. 2: La philosophie astronomique et la philosophie de la physique. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar

Conimbricenses 1607. In universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagirita. Cologne: Bernard Gualther.Google Scholar

Conimbricenses 1616 [1591–1606]. Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis Societatis Iesu, in octo libros physicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae, prima pars. Cologne.Google Scholar

Conimbricenses 1984 [1594]. Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis Societas Jesu in octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis. Edited by Manuel, de Gois. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar

Contarini, Gasparo 1571. Opera. Paris: Apud Sebastianum Nivellium.Google Scholar

Cook, Harold J. 2011. “The History of Medicine and the Scientific Revolution,” Isis 102: 102–108.Google Scholar

Cook, Monte 1996. “Descartes and the Dustbin of the Mind,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13: 17–33.Google Scholar

Cooper, Alix 2006. “Homes and Households,” in Park, Katharine and Daston, Lorraine (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 3: Early Modern Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 224–237.Google Scholar

Copenhaver, Brian 2018. “Against ‘Humanism’: Pico’s Job Description,” in Ossa-Richardson, Anthony and Meserve, Margaret (eds.), Et Amicorum: Essays on Renaissance Humanism and Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, pp. 198–240.Google Scholar

Copernicus, Nicolaus 1543. De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, libri VI. Nuremburg: Iohannes Petreus.Google Scholar

Copernicus, Nicolaus 1978. On the Revolutions. Translated by Edward Rosen. Vol. 2. Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Cormack, Lesley B. 2017. “Handwork and Brainwork: Beyond the Zilsel Thesis,” in Cormack, Lesley B., Walton, Steven A., and Schuster, John A. (eds.), Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 11–36.Google Scholar

Cormack, Lesley B., Walton, Steven A., and Schuster, John A. (eds.) 2017. Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Costabel, Pierre 1951. “La mécanique dans l’Encyclopédie,” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences et de leurs Applications 4: 267–293.Google Scholar

Costabel, Pierre 1983. La question des forces vives: La signification d’un débat sur trente ans (1728–1758). Paris: Centre de Documentation Sciences Humaines.Google Scholar

Coste, Pierre 1691. “Discours sur la philosophie,” in Régis, Pierre-Sylvain, Cours entier de philosophie, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Huguetan.Google Scholar

Coudert, Allison 1975. “A Cambridge Platonist’s Cabbalist Nightmare,” Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 633–652.Google Scholar

Cramer, Gabriel 1750. Introduction à l’analyse des lignes courbes algébriques. Geneva: Chez les Frères Cramer and Cl. Philibert.Google Scholar

Craver, Carl F., and Darden, Lindley 2013. In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Crespi, A. L. 1931. La vita e le opere di Francesco Patrizi. Milan: Scuola Tip. Artigianelli.Google Scholar

Crockett, Timothy 2005. “Leibniz on Shape and the Cartesian Conception of Body,” in Nelson, Alan (ed.), A Companion to Rationalism, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 262–281.Google Scholar

Crombie, Alistair C., and Carugo, A. 1996. “The Jesuits and Galileo’s Ideas of Science and Nature,” in Science, Art and Nature in Medieval and Modern Thought, London: Hambledon Press, pp. 165–230.Google Scholar

Cudworth, Ralph 1678. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. London: R. Royston.Google Scholar

Cudworth, Ralph 1977. The True Intellectual System of the Universe, in Collected Works, Vol. 1. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew 1985. “Fabricius and the ‘Aristotle Project’ in Anatomical Teaching and Research at Padua,” in Wear, Andrew, French, Roger K., and Lonie, I. M. (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–222.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew 1988a. “Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on the Identity and Invention of Science,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 19: 365–389.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew 1988b. “William Harvey: The Discovery of the Circulation of the Blood,” in Porter, Roy (ed.), Man Masters Nature: Twenty-Five Centuries of Science, New York: G. Bazillier, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew 1997. The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients. Brookfield, VT: Scolar Press.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew 2000. “The Identity of Natural Philosophy. A Response to Edward Grant,” Early Science and Medicine 5: 259–278.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew 2010. The Anatomist Anatomis’d: An Experimental Discipline in Enlightenment Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew, and Williams, Perry 1993. “De-Centering the ‘Big Picture’: The Origins of Modern Science and the Modern Origins of Science,” British Journal for the History of Science 26: 407–432.Google Scholar

D’Alembert, Jean le Rond 1743. Traité de dynamique. Paris: David.Google Scholar

D’Alembert, Jean Le Rond 1744. Traité de l’équilibre et du mouvement des fluides: pour servir de suite au Traité de dynamique. Paris: David.Google Scholar

D’Alembert, Jean Le Rond 1752. Essai d’une nouvelle théorie de la resistance des fluides. Paris: David.Google Scholar

D’Alembert, Jean Le Rond 1758. “Discours préliminaire,” in Traité de dynamique, Paris: David, pp. i–xxxv.Google Scholar

Dales, Richard C. 1980. “The De-Animation of the Heavens in the Middle Ages,” Journal of the History of Ideas 41: 531–550.Google Scholar

Damerow, Peter, Freudenthal, Gideon, McLaughlin, Peter, and Renn, Jürgen 2004. Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Daniel, Gabriel 1690. Voiage du monde de Descartes. Paris: Veuve de Simon Bénard.Google Scholar

Daniel, Gabriel 1692. A Voyage to the World of Cartesius. Translated by Thomas Taylor. London: Thomas Bennet.Google Scholar

Darrigol, Olivier 2012. A History of Optics from Greek Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Darrigol, Olivier, and Frisch, Uriel 2008. “From Newton’s Mechanics to Euler’s Equations,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 237: 1855–1869.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine 1995a. “Curiosity in Early Modern Science,” Word and Image 11: 391–404.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine 1995b. “The Moral Economy of Science,” Osiris 2: 2–10.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine 2017. “The History of Science and the History of Knowledge,” Know 1: 131–154.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, and Gallison, Peter 1999. Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Daumas, Maurice 1953. Les instruments scientifiques au XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Davis, A. E. L. 2003. “The Mathematics of the Area Law: Kepler’s Successful Proof in Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae (1621),” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57: 355–393.Google Scholar

De Angelis, Simone 2008. “From Text to the Body: Commentaries on De Anima, Anatomical Practice and Authority around 1600,” in Campi, Emidio, De Angelis, Simone, Goeing, Anja-Silvia, and Grafton, Anthony T. (eds.), Scholarly Knowledge: Textbooks in Early Modern Europe, Geneva: Libraries Droz, pp. 205–228.Google Scholar

De Angelis, Simone 2010. Anthropologien: Genese und Konfiguration einer “Wissenschaft vom Menschen” in der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin.Google Scholar

De Franco, Luigi 1995. Introduzione a Bernardino Telesio. Soveria Manelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar

De Pace, Anna 1993. Le matematiche e il mondo: ricerche su un dibattito in Italia nella seconda metà del Cinquecento. Milan: Francoangeli.Google Scholar

De Sallo, Denis 1689. Le journal des sçavans depuis le mois de Juin jusques à la fin de l’année MDCLXXXVIII. Amsterdam: Wolfgang, Waezberge, Boom, and van Someren.Google Scholar

De Waard, Cornelis 1906. Uitvinding der Verrekijkers. ’s-Gravenhage: De Nederl. Boek- en Steendrukkerij voorheen H. L. Smits.Google Scholar

De Waard, Cornelis 1925. “Les objections de Pierre Petit contre le Discours et les Essais de Descartes,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 32: 53–89.Google Scholar

De Wreede, L. C. 2007. Willebrord Snellius (1580–1626): A Humanist Reshaping the Mathematical Sciences. PhD dissertation. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter 1984. “Marin Mersenne and the Probabilistic Roots of ‘Mitigated Scepticism’,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 22: 173–205.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter 1987. “Jesuit Mathematical Science and the Reconstitution of Experience in the Early Seventeenth Century,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18: 133–175.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter 1988. Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter 1991. “Narratives, Anecdotes, and Experiments: Turning Experience into Science in the Seventeenth Century,” in Dear, Peter (ed.), The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument: Historical Studies, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 135–163.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter 1995. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter 1998. “Method and the Study of Nature,” in Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–177.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter 2005. “What Is the History of Science the History Of?: Early Modern Roots of the Ideology of Modern Science,” Isis 96: 390–406.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter 2006. “The Meanings of Experience,” in Park, Katharine and Daston, Lorraine (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 3: Early Modern Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 106–131.Google Scholar

Debus, Alan G. 1978. Man and Nature in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dee, John 1978. John Dee on Astronomy: Propaedeumata aphoristica (1558 and 1568, Latin and English). Translated by Wayne Shumaker. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Deer, Linda Richardson 2018. Academic Theories of Generation in the Renaissance: The Contemporaries and Successors of Jean Fernel (1497–1558). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Deitz, Luc 1997. “‘Falsissima est ergo haec de triplici substantia Aristotelis doctrina.’ A Sixteenth-Century Critic of Aristotle – Francesco Patrizi da Cherso on Privation, Form, and Matter,” Early Science and Medicine 2: 227–250.Google Scholar

Deitz, Luc 2007. “Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s Criticism of Aristotle’s Logic,” Vivarium 45: 113–124.Google Scholar

Deitz, Luc 2019. “Do We Have Any Genuine Works by Aristotle? Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s Discussion of the Corpus Aristotelicum,” Intellectual History Review 29: 545–560.Google Scholar

Del Prete, Antonella 2001a. “Charles Sorel et l’Italie: une interprétation de la Renaissance,” in Foucault, Didier and Cavaillé, Jean-Pierre (eds.), Sources antiques de l’irréligion moderne, Toulouse: Université Toulouse-Le Mirail, pp. 171–80.Google Scholar

Del Prete, Antonella 2001b. “Explications sur le mystère de l’Eucharistie suivant les principes de la philosophie de Descartes,” La Lettre Clandestine 10: 226–260.Google Scholar

Del Soldato, Eva 2010. Simone Porzio: un aristotelico tra natura e grazia. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael 2015. “Interpreting Spinoza: The Real is the Rational,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 523–535.Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis 1996. Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis 2000a. Life’s Form: Late Aristotelian Conceptions of the Soul. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis 2000b. “Life and Health in Cartesian Natural Philosophy,” in Gaukroger, Stephen, Schuster, John, and Sutton, John (eds.), Descartes’ Natural Philosophy, London: Routledge, pp. 723–735.Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis 2001. Spirits and Clocks: Machine and Organism in Descartes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis 2005. “Mechanisms of Life in the Seventeenth Century: Borelli, Perrault, Régis,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 245–260.Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis 2006. “From Natural Philosophy to Natural Science,” in Rutherford, Donald (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–94.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1637a. Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire sa raison et chercher la verité dans les sciences. Plus la Dioptrique, les Météores, et la Géométrie. Leiden: Ian Maire.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1637b. La Géométrie, in Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire sa raison et chercher la verité dans les sciences. Plus la Dioptrique, les Météores, et la Géométrie, Leiden: Ian Maire, pp. 295–413.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1668. Traité de la mechanique. Edited by Poisson, N. J.. Paris: C. Angot.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1964–1974 [1897–1913]. Oeuvres de Descartes. Edited by Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. New ed. 11 vols. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1972. Treatise on Man. Translated by Thomas Steele Hall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1982 [1644]. Principles of Philosophy. Edited by Miller, Valentine Rodger and Miller, Reese P.. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1984–1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Edited and translated by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, and Kenny, Anthony. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1989. The Passions of the Soul. Translated by Stephen H. Voss. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1996. Oeuvres de Descartes. Edited by Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. Reprint ed. 11 vols. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 1998. The World and Other Writings. Translated by Stephen Gaukroger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Descartes, René 2001. Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology. Edited by Olscamp, P. J.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Detlefsen, Karen 2013. “Teleology and Natures in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation,” in Detlefsen, Karen (ed.), Descartes’ Meditations: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–176.Google Scholar

Di Bono, Mario 1990. Le sfere omocentriche di Giovan Battista Amico nell’astronomia del Cinquecento. Genoa: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.Google Scholar

Di Liscia, Daniel 2014. “A tract De maximo et minimo according to Albert of Saxony,” SCIAMVS 15: 57–14.Google Scholar

Di Liscia, Daniel A., Kessler, Eckhard, and Methuen, Charlotte (eds.) 1997. Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Dibon, Paul 1990. Regards sur la Hollande du Siècle d’or. Naples: Vivarium.Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis, and D’Alembert, Jean le Rond (eds.) 1751–1772. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers. 28 vols. Paris: Briasson et al.Google Scholar

Digby, Kenelm 1644. Two Treatises. In the one of which, the Nature of Bodies; in the other, the Nature of Mans Soule; is looked into: in way of discovery, of the Immortality of Reasonable Soules. Paris: Gilles Blaizot.Google Scholar

Digby, Kenelm 1658. Discours fait en une célèbre assemblée, par le chevalier Digby … touchant la guérison des playes par la poudre de sympathie. Paris: Ch. Osmond.Google Scholar

Digges, Leonard, and Digges, Thomas 1571. A Geometrical Practice, Named Pantometria. London: Henrie Bynneman.Google Scholar

Digges, Leonard, and Digges, Thomas 1590. An Arithmetical Warlike Treatise Named Stratioticos. London: Richard Field.Google Scholar

Digges, Leonard, and Digges, Thomas 1591. A Geometrical Practical Treatize Named Pantometria. London: Abell Jeffes.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, E. J. 1961. The Mechanization of the World Picture. Translated by C. Dikshoorn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Distelzweig, Peter 2013. “The Intersection of the Mathematical and Natural Sciences: The Subordinate Sciences in Aristotle,” Apeiron 46: 85–105.Google Scholar

Distelzweig, Peter 2014a. “Fabricius’s Galeno-Aristotelian Teleomechanics of Muscle,” in Nachtomy, Ohad and Smith, Justin E. H. (eds.), The Life Sciences in Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar

Distelzweig, Peter 2014b. “Meam de motu & usu cordis, & ciruitu sanguinis sententiam: Teleology in William Harvey’s De Motu Cordis,” Gesnerus: Swiss Journal of the History of Medicine and Science 71: 258–70.Google Scholar

Distelzweig, Peter 2015. “The Use of Usus and the Function of Functio: Teleology and Its Limits in Descartes’s Physiology,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 377–399.Google Scholar

Distelzweig, Peter 2016. “‘Mechanics’ and Mechanism in William Harvey’s Anatomy: Varieties and Limits,” in Distelzweig, Peter, Goldberg, Benjamin, and Ragland, Evan R. (eds.), Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 117–140.Google Scholar

Distelzweig, Peter, Goldberg, Benjamin, and Ragland, Evan R. (eds.) 2016. Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Dobbs, B. J. T. 2000. “Newton as Final Cause and First Mover,” in Osler, Margaret J. (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar

Dobre, Mihnea 2011. “The Vanishing Nature of Body in Descartes’s Natural Philosophy,” in Jalobeanu, Dana and Anstey, Peter R. (eds.), Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Physics, New York: Routledge, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar

Dobre, Mihnea 2013a. “On Glass-Drops: A Case Study of the Interplay between Experimentation and Explanation in Seventeenth-Century Natural Philosophy,” Journal of Early Modern Studies 2: 105–124.Google Scholar

Dobre, Mihnea 2013b. “Rohault’s Cartesian Physics,” in Dobre, Mihnea and Nyden, Tammy (eds.), Cartesian Empiricisms, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 203–226.Google Scholar

Dobre, Mihnea, and Nyden, Tammy (eds.) 2013. Cartesian Empiricisms. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Domski, Mary 2009. “The Intelligibility of Motion and Construction: Descartes’ Early Mathematics and Metaphysics, 1619–1637,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40: 119–130.Google Scholar

Domski, Mary 2019. “Newton and Descartes,” in Jalobeanu, Dana and Wolfe, Charles T. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_113-1.Google Scholar

Domski, Mary 2020. “Descartes, Mathematics and the Science of Motion,” in Jalobeanu, Dana and Wolfe, Charles T. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_29-2.Google Scholar

Domski, Mary, and Dickson, Michael (eds.) 2010. Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Downing, Lisa 2002. “Robert Boyle,” in Nadler, Steven (ed.), A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, Chichester: Blackwell, pp. 338–353.Google Scholar

Downing, Lisa 2014. “Locke’s Metaphysics and Newtonian Metaphysics,” in Biener, Zvi and Schliesser, Eric (eds.), Newton and Empiricism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 97–118.Google Scholar

Drake, Stillman 1957. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Drake, Stillman 1970a. “The Dispute over Bodies in Water,” in Galileo Studies, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 159–176.Google Scholar

Drake, Stillman 1970b. Galileo Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Drake, Stillman 1976a. “Galileo’s First Telescopic Observations,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 7: 153–168.Google Scholar

Drake, Stillman 1976b. Galileo Against the Philosophers. Los Angeles: Zeitlin & Ver Brugge.Google Scholar

Drake, Stillman, and Drabkin, I. E. 1969. Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Dreyer, J. L. E. 1953. A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Du Châtelet, Emilie 1740. Institutions de physique. Paris: Prault Fils.Google Scholar

Du Châtelet, Emilie 1741. Réponse de Madame la Marquise du Chastelley à la lettre que M. de Mairan, Secrétaire Perpétuel de l’Académie royale des sciences, lui a écrite le 18 février 1741 sur la question des forces vives. Brussels: Foppens.Google Scholar

Du Châtelet, Emilie 1742. Institutions de physique. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Aux Depens de la Compagnie.Google Scholar

Du Châtelet, Emilie 2009. Selected Philosophical and Scientific Writings. Translated by Judith P. Zinsser and Isabel Bour. Edited by Zinsser, Judith P.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Duchesneau, François 1994. La dynamique de Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Duchesneau, François 1998. Les modéles du vivant de Descartes à Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Ducheyne, Steffen 2005. “Joan Baptiste Van Helmont and the Question of Experimental Modernism,” Physis 43: 305–332.Google Scholar

Ducheyne, Steffen 2011. “Newton on Action at a Distance and the Cause of Gravity,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42: 154–159.Google Scholar

Ducheyne, Steffen 2012. The Main Business of Natural Philosophy: Isaac Newton’s Natural-Philosophical Methodology. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Ducheyne, Steffen 2013. “The Status of Theory and Hypotheses,” in Anstey, Peter R. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 169–191.Google Scholar

Dumitru, Claudia 2013. “Crucial Instances and Crucial Experiments in Bacon, Boyle and Hooke,” Societate şi Politică 7: 45–61.Google Scholar

Duncan, Stewart 2005. “Hobbes’s Materialism in the Early 1640s,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13: 437–448.Google Scholar

Dunlop, Katherine 2012. “What Geometry Postulates: Newton and Barrow on the Relationship of Mathematics to Nature,” in Janiak, Andrew and Schliesser, Eric (eds.), Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–101.Google Scholar

Dunn, John M. 1968. “The Identity of the History of Ideas,” Philosophy 43: 85–104.Google Scholar

Dupré, Sven 2002. Galileo, the Telescope, and the Science of Optics in the Sixteenth Century. PhD dissertation. Ghent: Universiteit Ghent.Google Scholar

Dupré, Sven 2010. “William Bourne’s Invention. Projecting a Telescope and Optical Speculation in Elizabethan England,” in Van Helden, Albert, Dupré, Sven, van Gent, Rob, and Zuidervaart, Huib J. (eds.), The Origins of the Telescope, Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, pp. 129–146.Google Scholar

Dupré, Sven 2012. “Kepler’s Optics Without Hypotheses,” Synthese 185: 501–525.Google Scholar

Eamon, William 1994. Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Eamon, William 2011. “How to Read a Book of Secrets,” in Rankin, Alisha and Leong, Elaine (eds.), Secrets and Knowledge in Medicine and Science, 1500–1800, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 35–58.Google Scholar

Earman, John 1989. World Enough and Spacetime. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ebeling, Florian 2005. Das Geheimnis des Hermes Trismegistos. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Ebeling, Florian 2007. The Secret History of Hermes Trismegistus: Hermeticism from Ancient to Modern Times. Translated by David Lorton. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Edelstein, Dan 2010. The Enlightenment: A Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, Clinton R. 1969. “Mapping by Questionnaire: An Early Spanish Attempt to Determine New World Geographical Positions,” Imago Mundi 23: 17–28.Google Scholar

Edwards, Michael 2005. “Aristotelianism, Descartes, and Hobbes,” Historical Journal 50: 449–464.Google Scholar

Egmond, Florike 2010. The World of Carolus Clusius: Natural History in the Making, 1550–1610. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar

Eichstadius, Laurentius 1644. Tabulae harmonicae coelestium motuum. Stettin: Typis Georgii Rhetii.Google Scholar

Ekholm, Karin 2008. “Harvey’s and Highmore’s Accounts of Chick Generation,” Early Science and Medicine 13: 568–614.Google Scholar

Ent, Georgio 1641. Apologia pro circulatione sanguinis: qua respondetur Aemilio Parisano medico Veneto. London: R. Young.Google Scholar

Eriksen, Christoffer Basse 2018. Beneath the Visible Nature and the Sub-Visible World in Early Modern Microscopy. PhD dissertation. Aarhus: Aarhus University.Google Scholar

Ernst, Germana 2010. Tommaso Campanella: The Book and the Body of Nature. Translated by David L. Marshall. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Ernst, Germana 2014. “Tommaso Campanella,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/campanella/.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard 1736. Mechanica: sive, motus scientia analytice exposita. Saint Petersburg: ex Typographia Academiae Scientiarum.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard 1744. Methodus inveniendi lineas curvas maximi minimive proprietate gaudente. Lausanne and Geneva: Bousquet.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard 1745. “Dissertation sur la meilleure construction du cabestan,” in Pièces qui ont remporté le prix de l’Académie royale des sciences en 1741, Paris, pp. 29–87.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard 1748. Introductio in analysin infinitorum. Lausanne: Bousquet.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard 1750. “Reflexions sur L’Espace et Le Tems,” Memoires de L’Académie des Sciences de Berlin: 324–333.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard 1755. Institutiones calculi differentialis. St. Petersburg: Academiae Imperialis Scientiarum.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard 1765. Theoria motus corporum solidorum seu rigidorum. Rostock and Greifswald: A. F. Röse.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard 1824. Institutiones calculi integralis. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar

Evans, James 1998. The History and Practice of Ancient Astronomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fabri, Honoré 1669. Physica, id est, scientia rerum corporearum. Lyons: Anisson.Google Scholar

Fabricius ab Aquapendente, Hieronymus 1603. De venarum ostiolis. Padua: L. Pasquati.Google Scholar

Fabricius ab Aquapendente, Hieronymus 1600. De visione. De voce. De auditu. Venice: Per Francisum Bolzettam.Google Scholar

Fabricius ab Aquapendente, Hieronymus 1615. De respiratione et eius instrumentis. Padua: P. Meglietti.Google Scholar

Fabricius ab Aquapendente, Hieronymus 1942. The Embryological Treatises of Hieronymus Fabricius of Aquapendente. Translated by Howard Adelmann. 2 vols. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Farrington, Benjamin 1964. The Philosophy of Francis Bacon; An Essay on Its Development from 1603 to 1609 with New Translations of Fundamental Texts. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Feingold, Mordechai 2001. “Mathematicians and Naturalists: Sir Isaac Newton and the Royal Society,” in Buchwald, Jed Z. and Cohen, I. Bernard (eds.), Isaac Newton’s Natural Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 76–102.Google Scholar

Feingold, Mordechai 2010. “The War on Newton,” Isis 101: 175–186.Google Scholar

Feingold, Mordechai 2016. “‘Experimental Philosophy’: Invention and Rebirth of a Seventeenth-Century Concept,” Early Science and Medicine 21: 1–28.Google Scholar

Felden, Johannes 1642. Tractatus de enunciationibus et syllogismis. Helmaestad: Muller.Google Scholar

Feldhay, Rivka 1998. “The Use and Abuse of Mathematical Entities,” in Machamer, Peter (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galileo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–145.Google Scholar

Ferguson, James P. 1974. The Philosophy of Dr. Samuel Clarke and Its Critics. New York: Vantage Press.Google Scholar

Fermat, Pierre de 1679. “Ad locos planos et solidos isagoge,” in Varia opera mathematica, Toulouse.Google Scholar

Fernel, Jean 1555. Medicina. Venice: Apud Balthassarem.Google Scholar

Fernel, Jean 2003. The Physiologia of Jean Fernel (1567). Edited and translated by Forrester, J. M.. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar

Fichant, Michel 1998. Science et métaphysique dans Descartes et Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Ficino, Marsilio 1989. Three Books on Life: A Critical Edition and Translation. Translated by Carol V. Kaske and John R. Clark. Binghamton: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar

Field, J. V. 1984. “A Lutheran Astrologer: Johannes Kepler,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 31: 189–272.Google Scholar

Field, J. V., and James, Frank A. J. L. 1993. “Introduction,” in Field, J. V. and James, Frank A. J. L. (eds.), Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen, and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Findlen, Paula 1994. Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Findlen, Paula 2006. “Natural History,” in Park, Katharine and Daston, Lorraine (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 3: Early Modern Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 435–469.Google Scholar

Fisher, Saul 2005. Pierre Gassendi’s Philosophy and Science: Atomism for Empiricists. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Fleming, James Dougal 2011. “‘The Undiscoverable Country: Occult Qualities, Scholasticism, and the End of Nescience,” in Fleming, James Dougal (ed.), The Invention of Discovery, 1500–1700, London: Routledge, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar

Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier de 1731. Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences. Année M. DCCXXIX. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar

Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier de 1737 [1686]. A Week’s Conversation on the Plurality of Worlds. Translated by Aphra Behn, Joseph Addison, Joseph Glanvill, and John Hughes. 6th ed. London: A. Bettesworth.Google Scholar

Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier de 1740. Éloges des académiciens, avec l’Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences. 2 vols. La Haye: I. van der Kloot.Google Scholar

Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier de 1752. Oeuvres. 8 vols. Paris: Brunet.Google Scholar

Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier de 1766. “Digression sur les Anciens et les Modernes,” in Oeuvres, Vol. 4, Paris: Libraires Associés, pp. 169–198.Google Scholar

Force, James E., and Popkin, Richard H. (eds.) 2013. Newton and Religion: Context, Nature, and Influence. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Fors, Hjalmar, Principe, Lawrence M., and Sibum, H. Otto 2016. “From the Library to the Laboratory and Back Again: Experiment as a Tool for Historians of Science,” Ambix 63: 85–97.Google Scholar

Foucher, Simon 1995. “Critique [of Nicolas Malebranche’s] Of the Search for the Truth,” in Watson, Richard A. and Grene, Marjorie (eds.), Malebranche’s First and Last Critics: Simon Foucher and Dortous de Mairan, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar

Fournier, Marian 1996. The Fabric of Life: Microscopy in the 17th Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Fracastoro, Girolamo 1574. Opera omnia. Venice: Giunta.Google Scholar

France, Catherine Ann 2014. Gunnery and the Struggle for the New Science (1537–1687). Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar

Frank, Günter 2003. Die Vernunft des Gottesgedankens Religionsphilosophische Studien zur frühen Neuzeit. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Frank, Robert G. 1972. “Harvey Redux,” Journal of the History of Biology 5: 189–204.Google Scholar

Frank, Robert G. 1976. “Institutional Structure and Scientific Activity in the Early Royal Society,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Congress of the History of Science, Vol. 4, Tokyo, pp. 82–101.Google Scholar

Frank, Robert G. 1980. Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists: Scientific Ideas and Social Interaction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Fraser, Craig 1983. “Lagrange’s Early Contributions to the Principles and Methods of Mechanics,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 28: 197–241.Google Scholar

Fraser, Craig 1989. “The Calculus as Algebraic Analysis: Some Observations on Mathematical Analysis in the 18th Century,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 39: 317–335.Google Scholar

Fraser, Craig 1990. “Lagrange’s Analytical Mathematics, Its Cartesian Origins and Reception in Comte’s Positive Philosophy,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21: 243–256.Google Scholar

Fraser, Craig 1997. Calculus and Analytical Mechanics in the Age of Enlightenment. Brookfield: Variorum.Google Scholar

Fredette, Raymond 2001. “Galileo’s De motu antiquiora: Notes for a Reappraisal,” in Montesinos, José and Santos, Carlos Solis (eds.), Largo campo di filosofare, La Orotava: Fundacion Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia, pp. 165–181.Google Scholar

French, Peter J. 1972. John Dee: The World of an Elizabethan Magus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

French, Roger K. 1985. “Berengario da Carpi and the Use of Commentary in Anatomical Teaching,” in Wear, Andrew, French, Roger K., and Lonie, I. M. (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–74.Google Scholar

French, Roger K. 1989. “Harvey in Holland: Circulation and the Calvinists,” in French, Roger K. and Wear, Andrew (eds.), The Medical Revolution of the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–86.Google Scholar

French, Roger K. 1994. William Harvey’s Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

French, Roger K. 1999. Dissection and Vivisection in the European Renaissance: The History of Medicine in Context. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Frey, Ianus Caecilius 1646. Opuscula varia nusquam edita. Paris: Apud Petrum David.Google Scholar

Frey, Ianus Caecilius 2003. Cribrum philosophorum. Edited by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Lecce: Conte Editore.Google Scholar