Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:38:57.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Some developments in the philosophy of mathematics, 1790–1870

from II - Logic and Mathematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Allen W. Wood
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Songsuk Susan Hahn
Affiliation:
Université Concordia, Montréal, Québec
Get access

Summary

Introductions to the philosophy of mathematics rarely focus on the period 1790–1870, if they mention it at all. Aside from Mill’s empiricist program, what was happening in the philosophy of mathematics between Kant and Frege? Certainly there were crucial mathematical developments. For example, non-Euclidean geometry was discovered in the 1830s, and this paved the way for later conventionalist and formalist philosophies of mathematics such as those offered by Poincaré and Hilbert. In addition, the rigorization of analysis during our period was an important precedent to logicism, a philosophical program espoused by Frege, Dedekind, and Russell just after 1870. But where is the influential philosophy?

Of course, there were philosophers, so there was also philosophy of mathematics. One approach to this period would be to survey what philosophers such as Hegel, Herbart, Fries, Mill, and Comte said about mathematics. However, few of these authors are known for their contributions to philosophy of mathematics, with the notable exception of Mill. Moreover, most of this philosophical work seems far removed from the revolutionary developments in mathematics. On the other hand, entwined in the mathematical developments are crucial and fascinating philosophical arguments. In fact, it is precisely in its close connection to mathematical developments that the relevant philosophy is so exciting, for it shows that the border between mathematics and its philosophy is both permeable and dynamic. Philosophical issues arise in mathematics, and mathematicians deal with them, explicitly and implicitly, in their creative work and in their teaching. Furthermore, how the philosophical issues are treated affects mathematics.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkeley, George. “The Analyst.” 1734. Excerpted in From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996, 62–92.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George “De Motu.” 1721. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 38–54.
Berkeley, George Philosophical Commentaries, notebooks A, B. 1707–8. Excerpted in Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 14–16.
Berkeley, George A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Part One. 1710. Excerpted in Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 21–37.
Bolzano, Bernard. “Contributions to a Better-Grounded Presentation of Mathematics.” 1810. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 176–224.
Bolzano, Bernard “Purely Analytic Proof….” 1817. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 227–48.
Bolzano, Bernard Wissenschaftslehre. 1837. Abridged trans. by Rolf George as Theory of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonola, Roberto. Non-Euclidean Geometry. Trans. Horatio Scott Carslaw. New York: Dover, 1955.Google Scholar
Bottazzini, Umberto. The Higher Calculus: A History of Real and Complex Analysis from Euler to Weierstrass. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffa, J. Alberto. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedekind, Richard. “Continuity and Irrational Numbers.” 1872. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 766–79.
Dedekind, Richard “On the Introduction of New Functions in Mathematics.” 1854. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 755–62.
De Morgan, Augustus. The Differential and Integral Calculus. London: Baldwin & Cradock, 1842.Google Scholar
De Morgan, Augustus“On Divergent Series and Various Points of Analysis Connected with Them.”Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 8 (1844): 182–203.Google Scholar
De Morgan, Augustus“Review of Peacock’s A Treatise on Algebra.”Quarterly Journal of Education 9 (1835): 91–110, 293–311.Google Scholar
De Morgan, Augustus Trigonometry and Double Algebra. 1849. Reference to first two chapters of bk. II reprinted in Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert.
Eves, Howard. Great Moments in Mathematics (After 1650). Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America, 1981.Google Scholar
Ewald, William (ed.). From Kant to Hilbert. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
Fisch, Menachem. “The Making of Peacock’s Treatise on Algebra: A Case of Creative Indecision.” Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 54 (1999): 137–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. The Foundations of Arithmetic. 1884. Trans. J. L. Austin. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Gauss, Carl Friedrich. Letter to Bessel. 1829. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 301.
Gauss, Carl Friedrich. Letter to Schumacher. 1831. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 302–5.
Gauss, Carl Friedrich. Letter to Wolfgang von Bolyai. 1799. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 299.
Grabiner, Judith. The Origins of Cauchy’s Rigorous Calculus. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Gray, Jeremy. “The Discovery of Non-Euclidean Geometry.” 1987. In Studies in the History of Mathematics. Ed. Phillips, Esther, 37–60. Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America, 1987.Google Scholar
Gray, JeremyIdeas of Space, Euclidean, Non-Euclidean and Relativistic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William Rowan. Preface to the “Lectures on Quaternions.” 1853. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 376–425.
Hamilton, William RowanTheory of Conjugate Functions or Algebraic Couples; with a Preliminary and Elementary Essay on Algebra as the Science of Pure Time.” Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 17, pt. I (1837): 293–422. Excerpted in Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 369–75.Google Scholar
Helmholz, Hermann von. “The Origin and Meaning of Geometrical Axioms.” 1876. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 663–89.
Kitcher, Philip. “Bolzano’s Ideal of Algebraic Analysis.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 6 (1975): 229–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip “Mill, Mathematics, and the Naturalist Tradition.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Ed. Skorupski, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 57–111.Google Scholar
Kitcher, PhilipThe Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lambert, Johann Heinrich. “Theory of Parallel Lines.” 1786. Excerpted in Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 158–67.
Mancosu, Paolo. “Bolzano and Cournot on Mathematical Explanation.” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 52 (1999): 429–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo . Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic. 1872. Ed. Robson, J. M.. 8th ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. “Impossible Numbers: A Chapter in the History of Modern Logic.” Studies in the History of Ideas 3 (1935): 429–74.Google Scholar
Nowak, Gregory. “Riemann’s Habilitationsvortrag and the Synthetic a priori Status of Geometry.” In The History of Modern Mathematics. Eds. Rowe, David and McCleary, John, 1:17–46. New York: Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Phillips, Esther (ed.). Studies in the History of Mathematics. Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America, 1987.
Pycior, Helena. “Early Criticism of the Symbolical Approach to Algebra.” Historia Mathematica 9 (1982): 392–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pycior, HelenaGeorge Peacock and the British Origins of Symbolical Algebra.” Historia Mathematica 8 (1981): 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pycior, HelenaThe Three Stages of Augustus De Morgan’s Algebraic Work.” Isis 74 (1983): 211–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Joan. “Augustus De Morgan, the History of Mathematics and the Foundations of Algebra.” Isis 78 (1987): 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, JoanRigor and Clarity: Foundations of Mathematics in France and England, 1800–1840.” Science in Context 4 (1991): 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemann, Georg Friedrich Bernhard. “On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry.” 1868. In Ewald, From Kant to Hilbert, 652–61.
Rowe, David, and McCleary, John (eds.). The History of Modern Mathematics, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1989.
Skorupski, John (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRef
Skorupski, John (ed.). John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge, 1989.
Lambert, Johann Heinrich, “Theory of Parallel Lines” (1786), excerpted in From Kant to Hilbert, ed. William Ewald (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 158–67Google Scholar
A Treatise on Algebra (Cambridge: J. & J. J. Deighton, 1830)
George, Rolf as Theory of Science (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×