From intuitionism to emotivism

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.061

58 - From intuitionism to emotivism

from 14 - Ethics, religion, and the arts

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Jonathan Dancy

Edited by

Thomas Baldwin

Show author details

Jonathan Dancy: Affiliation:
University of Reading
Thomas Baldwin: Affiliation:
University of York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Moral philosophy during the period under review was marked by the dominance in England of a form of ethical intuitionism that arose in response to G. E. Moore’s Principia Ethica (1903). By the mid-1930s this began to be challenged, both in England and in the United States, by various forms of emotivism. In some isolation from this debate, Dewey continued to write extensively on ethics.

INTUITIONISM

The intuitionist school consisted of H. A. Prichard, W.D. Ross, H.W. B. Joseph, and E. F. Carritt in Oxford and C. D. Broad and A. C. Ewing in Cambridge. Prichard should probably be considered the leader of the school, though he published the least; Broad called Prichard ‘a man of immense ability whom I have always regarded as the Oxford Moore’ (1971: 14).

The intuitionists believed that rightness and goodness were distinct qualities, qualities that such things as people, actions, emotions, motives, intentions, and consequences could have. They were interested in the nature of and relation between these two qualities and in the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic forms of them, and in which things in fact have these properties. Ross, for instance, argued that there was no such thing as instrumental goodness, that is, value as a means (1930: 133, 1939: 257); but he insisted that there was such a thing as intrinsic value, and that it was distinct from intrinsic rightness. Further, nothing was capable of being both intrinsically good and intrinsically right (Prichard 1912: 5–6).

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945 , pp. 693 - 705

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.061 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ayer, A. J. (1936). Language, Truth and Logic, London: Gollancz.Google Scholar

Barnes, W. H. F. (1934). ‘A Suggestion about Values’, Analysis 1.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barnes, W. H. F. (1948). ‘Ethics without Propositions’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. XXII.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, R. B. (1928). ‘Verbal Ambiguity and Philosophical Analysis’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. (1928). ‘Analysis of Some Ethical Concepts’, Journal of Philosophical Studies (Philosophy) 3; reprinted in Broad, 1971.Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. (1930). Five Types of Ethical Theory, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. (1934). ‘Is “Goodness” a Name of a Simple Non-Natural Quality?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 34; reprinted in Broad, 1971.CrossRef Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. (1945). ‘Some Reflections on Moral-Sense Theories in Ethics’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45; reprinted in Broad, 1971.CrossRef Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. (1971). Broad’s Critical Essays in Moral Philosophy, ed. Cheney, D., London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1935). Philosophy and Logical Syntax, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Carritt, E. F. (1928). The Theory of Morals, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carritt, E. F. (1935). Morals and Politics, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carritt, E. F. (1947). Ethical and Political Thinking, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. and Tufts, J. H. (1932). Ethics, rev. edn, New York: Holt (Later Works, vol. VII).Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1899–1924). The Middle Works: 1899–1924, 15 vols., ed. Boyston, J. A., Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press (1976–83).Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct, New York: Holt (Middle Works, vol. XIV).Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1925–53). The Later Works: 1925–1953, 17 vols., ed. Boyston, J. A., Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press (1976–83).Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty, New York: Milton, Balch and Co. (Later Works, vol. IV).Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1939). The Theory of Valuation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Later Works, vol. XIII).Google Scholar

Edwards, P. (1955). The Logic of Moral Discourse, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Ewing, A. C. (1929). The Morality of Punishment, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ewing, A. C. (1947). The Definition of Good, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ewing, A. C. (1953). Ethics, London: English Universities Press, Teach Yourself Books.Google Scholar

Ewing, A. C. (1959). Second Thoughts in Moral Philosophy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Festenstein, M. (1997). Pragmatism and Political Theory, Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Gouinlock, J. (1972). John Dewey’s Philosophy of Value, New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Hägerström, A. (1911). ‘Om Moraliska Föreställningars Sanning’. Trans. 1964 Sandin, R. T., Philosophy and Religion, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Hägerström, A. (1938). Inquiries into the Nature of Laws and Morals, trans. Broad, C. D., Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar

Hurley, P. E. (1988). ‘Dewey on Desires: The Lost Argument’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 24.Google Scholar

Joseph, H. W. B. (1931). Some Problems in Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. (1946). ‘A Refutation of Morals’, Australian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 24: 77f.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; rev. edn, ed. Baldwin, T. 1993.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. (1912). Ethics, London: Home University Library.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. (1952). ‘A Reply to my Critics’ in Schilpp, P. A. ed., The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, New York: Tudor Publishing Co..Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (1923). The Meaning of Meaning, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Prichard, H. A. (1912). ‘Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?’, Mind 21. Repr. in Prichard, 1968.Google Scholar

Prichard, H. A. (1928). ‘Duty and Interest’; inaugural lecture, repr. in Prichard, 1968.Google Scholar

Prichard, H. A. (1932). ‘Duty and Ignorance of Fact’, Proceedings of the British Academy; repr. with endnotes in Prichard, 1968.Google Scholar

Prichard, H. A. (1968). Moral Obligation, ed. Urmson, J. O., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rashdall, H. (1907). The Theory of Good and Evil, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, R. (1948). ‘The Emotive Theory of Ethics’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. XXII.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and The Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (1939). Foundations of Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. A. W. (1936). Religion and Science, New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Selby-Bigge, L. A. (1897). British Moralists, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Stevenson, C. L. (1937). ‘The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms’, Mind 46. Repr. in Stevenson, 1963.Google Scholar

Stevenson, C. L. (1938). ‘Persuasive Definitions’, Mind 47. Repr. in Stevenson, 1963.Google Scholar

Stevenson, C. L. (1944). Ethics and Language, Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Stevenson, C. L. (1948). ‘The Nature of Ethical Disagreement’, Sigma. Repr. in Stevenson, 1963. This piece was written in 1941.Google Scholar

Stevenson, C. L. (1963). Facts and Values, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Stratton, G. M. (1903). ‘A Psychological Test of Virtue’, International Journal of Ethics 11.Google Scholar

Urmson, J. O. (1968). The Emotive Theory of Ethics, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Urmson, J. O. (1975). ‘A Defence of Intuitionism’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75.CrossRef Google Scholar

Welchman, J. (1995). Dewey’s Ethical Thought, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Logische-philosophische Abhandlung, in Annalen der Natur Philosophie. Trans. 1961 Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1965). ‘Lecture on Ethics’, Philosophical Review 74.CrossRef Google Scholar