Anderson, Gordon A. The Latin Compositions in Fascicules vii and viii of the Notre Dame Manuscript Wolfenbüttel Helmstadt [sic] 1099 (1206), 2 vols., Musicological Studies 24/1–2. Brooklyn: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1968 and 1976.Google Scholar

Anonymous iv. Der Musiktraktat des Anonymus 4, ed. Reckow, Fritz, 2 vols., Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 4–5. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1967.Google Scholar

Arlt, Wulf. Ein Festoffizium des Mittelalters aus Beauvais in seiner liturgischen und musikalischen Bedeutung, 2 vols. Cologne: Arno Volk, 1970.Google Scholar

Arlt, Wulf., chair. “‘Peripherie’ und ‘Zentrum’ in der Geschichte der ein- und mehrstimmigen Musik des 12. bis 14. Jahrhunderts,” in Bericht über den internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongress, Berlin 1974, ed. Kühn, H. and Nitsche, P.. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1980, 15–170.Google Scholar

Arlt, Wulf and Haas, Max. “Pariser modale Mehrstimmigkeit in einem Fragment der Basler Universitätsbibliothek,” in Forum musicologicum: Basler Studien zur Musikgeschichte 1, ed. Arlt, W. et al. Bern: Francke, 1975, 223–72.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Charles M. “Franco of Cologne on the Rhythm of Organum Purum,” Early Music History 9 (1990), 1–26.Google Scholar

Baltzer, Rebecca A. “Another Look at a Composite Office and Its History: The Feast of Susceptio reliquarum in Medieval Paris,” Journal of the Royal Musical Association 113 (1988), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baltzer, R. A. “Aspects of Trope in the Earliest Motets for the Assumption of the Virgin,” in Studies in Medieval Music: Festschrift for Ernest H. Sanders, ed. Lefferts, P. M. and Seirup, B., Current Musicology, 45–47. New York: Columbia University Department of Music, 1990, 5–42.Google Scholar

Baltzer, R. A. “The Geography of the Liturgy at Notre-Dame of Paris,” in Plainsong in the Age of Polyphony, ed. Kelly, T. F., Cambridge Studies in Performance Practice 2. Cambridge University Press, 1992, 45–64.Google Scholar

Baltzer, R. A. “How Long Was Notre-Dame Organum Performed?” in Beyond the Moon: Festschrift Luther Dittmer, ed. Gillingham, B. and Merkley, P., Musicological Studies 113. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1990, 118–43.Google Scholar

Baltzer, R. A. “Notation, Rhythm, and Style in the Two-Voice Notre Dame Clausula,” 2 vols. in 3. Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University, 1974.Google Scholar

Baltzer, R. A. “Notre Dame Manuscripts and Their Owners: Lost and Found,” Journal of Musicology 5 (1987), 380–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baxter, J. H., ed. An Old St. Andrews Music Book (Cod. Helmst. 628), St. Andrews University Publications 30. London: Humphrey Milford; Oxford University Press, 1931.Google Scholar

Boussard, Jacques. Nouvelle histoire de Paris, de la fin du siège de 885–886 à la mort de Philippe Auguste, 2nd ed., ed. Fleury, M.. Paris: Hachette, 1997.Google Scholar

Bradley, Catherine A. “Contrafacta and Transcribed Motets: Vernacular Influences on Latin Motets and Clausulae in the Florence Manuscript,” Early Music History 33 (2014), 1–70.Google Scholar

Bradley, Catherine A. “Ordering in the Motet Fascicles of the Florence Manuscript,” Plainsong and Medieval Music 22 (2013), 37–64.Google Scholar

Bruzelius, Caroline. “The Construction of Notre-Dame in Paris,” Art Bulletin 69 (1987), 540–69.Google Scholar

Bukofzer, Manfred F. “Interrelationships between Conductus and Clausula,” Annales musicologiques 1 (1953), 65–103.Google Scholar

Busse Berger, Anna Maria. Medieval Music and the Art of Memory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Berger, A. M. Busse. “Mnemotechnics and Notre Dame Polyphony,” Journal of Musicology 14 (1996), 263–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, A. M. Busse. “Die Rolle der Mündlichkeit in der Komposition der ‘Notre Dame-Polyphonie,’” Das Mittelalter 3 (1998), 127–43.Google Scholar

Büttner, Fred. Das Klauselrepertoire der Handschrift Saint-Victor (Paris, BN, lat. 15139): Eine Studie zur mehrstimmigen Komposition im 13. Jahrhundert. Lecce: Milella, 2011.Google Scholar

Cazelles, Raymond. Nouvelle histoire de Paris, de la fin du règne de Philippe Auguste à la mort de Charles V, 1223–1380. Paris: Hachette, 1972.Google Scholar

Dittmer, Luther, ed. Facsimile Reproduction of the Manuscript Firenze, Biblioteca Mediceo-Laurenziana, Pluteo 29,1, 2 vols., Publications of Mediaeval Musical Manuscripts 10–11. Brooklyn: Institute of Mediaeval Music, [1966–67].Google Scholar

Dittmer, L., ed. Facsimile Reproduction of the Manuscript Madrid 20486, Publications of Mediaeval Musical Manuscripts 1. Brooklyn: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1957.Google Scholar

Dittmer, L., ed. Facsimile Reproduction of the Manuscript Wolfenbüttel 1099 (1206), Publications of Mediaeval Musical Manuscripts 2. Brooklyn: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1960.Google Scholar

Everist, Mark. “From Paris to St. Andrews: The Origins of W₁,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 43 (1990), 1–42.Google Scholar

Everist, M., ed. Polyphonic Music in Thirteenth-Century France: Aspects of Sources and Distribution, Outstanding Dissertations in Music from British Universities. New York: Garland, 1990.Google Scholar

Everist, M., ed. French 13th-Century Polyphony in the British Library: A Facsimile Edition of the Manuscripts Additional 30091 and Egerton 2615 (folios 79–94v). London: Plainsong and Mediæval Music Society, 1988.Google Scholar

Fassler, Margot. “Accent, Meter, and Rhythm in Medieval Treatises ‘De ritmis,’” Journal of Musicology 5 (1987), 164–90.Google Scholar

Fassler, M. Gothic Song: Victorine Sequences and Augustinian Reform in Twelfth-Century Paris, Cambridge Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Music. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Fassler, M. “The Role of the Parisian Sequence in the Evolution of Notre-Dame Polyphony,” Speculum 62 (1987), 345–74.Google Scholar

Fassler, M. “Who Was Adam of St. Victor? The Evidence of the Sequence Manuscripts,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 37 (1984), 233–69.Google Scholar

Flotzinger, Rudolf. “‘De Stephani roseo sanguine’: Vom Quadruplum zur einstimmigen Motette,” Die Musikforschung 37 (1984), 177–91.Google Scholar

Flotzinger, R. Der Discantussatz im Magnus liber und seiner Nachfolge, mit Beiträgen zur Frage der sogenannten Notre-Dame-Handschriften, Wiener musikwissenschaftliche Beiträge 8. Vienna: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1969.Google Scholar

Flotzinger, R. Leoninus musicus und der Magnus liber organi. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2003.Google Scholar

Flotzinger, R. Perotinus musicus, Wegbereiter abendländischen Komponierens. Mainz: Schott, 2000.Google Scholar

Flotzinger, R. Von Leonin zu Perotin: Der musikalische Paradigmenwechsel in Paris um 1210. Bern: Peter Lang, 2007.Google Scholar

Flotzinger, R. “Zu Perotin und seinem ‘Sederunt,’” in Analysen: Beiträge zu einer Problemgeschichte des Komponierens. Festschrift für Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht zum 65. Geburtstag, Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 23. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1984, 14–28.Google Scholar

Flotzinger, R. “Zur Frage der Modalrhythmik als Antik-Rezeption,” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 29 (1972), 203–08.Google Scholar

Franco of Cologne. Franconis de Colonia ars cantus mensurabilis, ed. Reaney, Gilbert and Gilles, André, CSM 18. n.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1974.Google Scholar

Godt, Irving and Rivera, Benito. “The Vatican Organum Treatise – A Colour Reproduction, Transcription and Translation into English,” in Gordon Athol Anderson (1929–1981) in Memoriam, von seinen Studenten, Freunden und Kollegen, 2 vols., Musicological Studies 49/1–2. Henryville, PA: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1984, ii: 264–345.Google Scholar

Gross, Guillaume. Chanter en polyphonie à Notre-Dame de Paris aux 12e et 13e siècles, Studia artistarum 14. Turnhout: Brepols, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, G. “Organum at Notre-Dame in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries: Rhetoric of Words and Music,” Plainsong and Medieval Music 15 (2006), 87–108.Google Scholar

Haggh, Barbara and Huglo, Michel. “Magnus liber – Maius munus: Origine et destinée du manuscrit F,” Revue de musicologie 90 (2004), 193–230.Google Scholar

Handschin, Jacques. “Was brachte die Notre Dame-Schule Neues?” Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft 6 (1924), 545–58.Google Scholar

Handschin, J. “Zur Geschichte von Notre-Dame,” Acta Musicologica 4 (1932), 5–17; 49–55; 104–05.Google Scholar

Handschin, J. “Zur Leonin-Perotin-Frage,” Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft 14 (1932), 319–21.Google Scholar

Handwörterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie, ed. Eggebrecht, Hans H. et al. Wiesbaden and Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1971–.Google Scholar

Holsinger, Bruce W. Music, Body, and Desire in Medieval Culture: Hildegard of Bingen to Chaucer, Reading Medieval Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Holsinger, B. W. “The Ovidian Verse Epistles of Master Leoninus (ca. 1135–1201),” The Journal of Medieval Latin 10 (2000), 239–54.Google Scholar

Huglo, Michel. “Les débuts de la polyphonie à Paris: les premiers organa parisiens,” in Forum musicologicum: Basler Beiträge zur Musikgeschichte 3 (Aktuelle Fragen der musikbezogenen Mittelalterforschung: Texte zu einem Basler Kolloquium des Jahres 1975), ed. Arlt, W.. Winterthur: Amadeus, 1982, 93–163.Google Scholar

Huglo, M. “Principes de l’ordonnance des répons organisés à Notre-Dame de Paris,” Revue de musicologie 83 (1997), 81–92.Google Scholar

Husmann, Heinrich. “The Enlargement of the Magnus liber organi and the Paris Churches St. Germain l’Auxerrois and Ste. Geneviève-du-Mont,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 16 (1963), 176–203.Google Scholar

Husmann, H. “The Origin and Destination of the Magnus liber organi,” The Musical Quarterly 49 (1963), 311–30.Google Scholar

Immel, Steven C. “The Vatican Organum Treatise Re-examined,” Early Music History 20 (2001), 121–72.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Peter C. “Ein neues Fragment zum Magnus liber organi.” Kleinüberlieferung mehrstimmiger Musik vor 1550 in deutschen Sprachgebiet 7, in Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, i. Philologisch-historische Klasse, Jg. 2006. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2006, 149–66.Google Scholar

Jerome of Moravia. Hieronymi de Moravia tractatus de musica, ed. Meyer, Christian and Lobrichon, Guy, Corpus Christianorum continuatio mediaevalis 250. Turnhout: Brepols, 2012.Google Scholar

de Garlandia, Johannes. Johannes de Garlandia: De mensurabili musica, kritische Edition mit Kommentar und Interpretation der Notationslehre, ed. Reimer, Erich, 2 vols., Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 10–11. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1972.Google Scholar

John of Salisbury. Ioannis Saresberiensis policraticus i-iv, ed. Keats-Rohan, K. S. B., Corpus Christianorum continuatio mediaevalis 118. Turnhout: Brepols, 1993.Google Scholar

Levy, Kenneth. “A Dominican Organum Purum,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 27 (1974), 183–211.Google Scholar

Lexicon musicum latinum medii aevi, ed. Bernhard, M., 2 vols. in 13 fasc. to date (2013). Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften; C. H. Beck, 1995–2012.Google Scholar

Losseff, Nicola. The Best Concords: Polyphonic Music in Thirteenth-Century Britain, Outstanding Dissertations in Music from British Universities. New York: Garland, 1994.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Friedrich. “Die liturgischen Organa Leonins und Perotins,” in Riemann-Festschrift: Gesammelte Studien. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel, 1909, 200–13.Google Scholar

Ludwig, F. Repertorium organorum recentioris et motetorum vetustissimi stili, 2nd, “erweiterte” ed., ed. Dittmer, L. A. et al., 2 vols. in 3, Musicological Studies 26. Hildesheim, New York, and Henryville PA: Georg Olms; Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1964–78 (Bd. I/1, Catalogue raisonné der Quellen, Handschriften in Quadrat-Notation, originally published Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1910).Google Scholar

Ludwig, F. Le magnus liber organi de Notre-Dame de Paris, general editor Roesner, Edward H., 7 vols. in 8. Les Remparts: Éditions de l’Oiseau-Lyre, 1993–2009:Google Scholar

Ludwig, F. i: Les quadrupla et tripla de Paris, ed. Roesner, Edward H.; plainchant ed. Huglo, Michel (1993).Google Scholar

Ludwig, F. ii: Les organa à deux voix pour l’Office du manuscrit de Florence, Biblioteca Medicea-Laurenziana, plut. 29.1, ed. Everist, Mark (2003).Google Scholar

Ludwig, F. iii–iv: Les organa à deux voix pour la Messe du manuscrit de Florence, Biblioteca Medicea-Laurenziana, plut. 29.1, ed. Everist, Mark (2001, 2002).Google Scholar

Ludwig, F. v: Les clausules à deux voix du manuscrit de Florence, Biblioteca Medicea-Laurenziana, pluteus 29.1, fascicule v, ed. Baltzer, Rebecca A. (1995).Google Scholar

Ludwig, F. vi: Les organa à deux voix du manuscrit de Wolfenbüttel, Herzog August Bibliothek, cod. Guelf. 1099 Helmst., ed. Payne, Thomas B., 2 vols. (1996).Google Scholar

Ludwig, F. vii: Les organa et les clausules à deux voix du manuscrit de Wolfenbüttel, Herzog August Bibliothek, cod. Guelf. 628 Helmst., ed. Roesner, Edward H.; plainchant ed. MacCarthy, E. A. and Hair, G.-M. (2009).Google Scholar

Page, Christopher. The Owl and the Nightingale: Musical Life and Ideas in France 1100–1300. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas B. “Associa tecum in patria: A Newly Identified Organum Trope by Philip the Chancellor,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 39 (1986), 233–54.Google Scholar

Payne, T. B. “Poetry, Politics, and Polyphony: Philip the Chancellor’s Contribution to the Music of the Notre Dame School,” 5 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 1991.Google Scholar

Philip the Chancellor. Motets and Prosulas, ed. Payne, Thomas B., Recent Researches in the Music of the Middle Ages and Early Renaissance 41. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions, 2011.Google Scholar

Pinegar, Sandra. “Textual and Contextual Relationships among Theoretical Writings on Measurable Music of the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries,” 2 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1991.Google Scholar

Reckow, Fritz. Die Copula: Über einige Zusammenhänge zwischen Setzweise, Formbildung, Rhythmus und Vortragsstil in der Mehrstimmigkeit von Notre-Dame, Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse 1972/13. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1972.Google Scholar

Reckow, F. “Das Organum,” in Gattungen der Musik in Einzeldarstellungen: Gedenkschrift Leo Schrade, erste Folge, ed. Arlt, W. et al. Berne: Francke, 1973, 434–96.Google Scholar

Robertson, Anne Walters. “Benedicamus domino: The Unwritten Tradition,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 41 (1988), 1–62.Google Scholar

Roesner, Edward H. “The Emergence of Musica mensurabilis,” in Studies in Musical Sources and Style: Essays in Honor of Jan LaRue, ed. Wolf, E. K. and Roesner, E. H.. Madison, WI: A-R Editions, 1990, 41–74.Google Scholar

Roesner, E. H., ed. “Johannes de Garlandia on Organum in speciali,” Early Music History 2 (1982), 129–60.Google Scholar

Roesner, E. H., ed. “The Performance of Parisian Organum,” Early Music 7 (1979), 174–89.Google Scholar

Roesner, E. H., ed. “The Problem of Chronology in the Transmission of Organum Duplum,” in Music in Medieval and Early Modern Europe: Patronage, Sources and Texts, ed. Fenlon, I.. Cambridge University Press, 1981, 365–90.Google Scholar

Roesner, E. H., ed. “Who ‘Made’ the Magnus liber?” Early Music History 20 (2001), 227–66.Google Scholar

Roesner, E. H., ed. Antiphonarium seu magnus liber organi de gradali et antiphonario: Color Microfiche Edition of the Manuscript Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Pluteus 29.1, Codices illuminati medii aevi 45. Munich: Helga Lengenfelder, 1996.Google Scholar

Rokseth, Yvonne. Polyphonies du XIIIe siècle, 4 vols. Paris: Éditions de l’Oiseau-Lyre, 1935–39.Google Scholar

Rouse, Richard H. and Rouse, Mary A.. Illiterati et uxorati, Manuscripts and Their Makers: Commercial Book Production in Medieval Paris, 1200–1500, 2 vols. Turnhout: Harvey Miller; Brepols, 2000.Google Scholar

Sanders, Ernest H. “Consonance and Rhythm in the Organum of the 12th and 13th Centuries,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 33 (1980), 264–86.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. H. “The Medieval Motet,” in Gattungen der Musik in Einzeldarstellungen: Gedenkschrift Leo Schrade, erste Folge, ed. Arlt, W. et al. Berne: Francke, 1973, 497–573.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. H. “The Question of Perotin’s Oeuvre and Dates,” in Festschrift für Walter Wiora zum 30. Dezember 1966, ed. Finscher, L. and Mahling, C.-H.. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1967, 241–49.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. H. “Style and Technique in Datable Polyphonic Notre-Dame Conductus,” in Gordon Athol Anderson (1929–1981) in Memoriam, von seinen Studenten, Freunden und Kollegen, 2 vols., Musicological Studies 49/1–2. Henryville, PA: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1984, ii: 505–30.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Helmut. “Zur Melodiebildung Leonins und Perotins,” Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft 14 (1931), 129–34.Google Scholar

Smith, Norman E. “The Clausulae of the Notre Dame School: A Reportorial Study,” 3 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 1964.Google Scholar

Smith, N.E. “From Clausula to Motet: Material for Further Studies in the Origin and Early History of the Motet,” Musica Disciplina 34 (1980), 29–65.Google Scholar

Smith, N.E. “Interrelationships among the Alleluias of the Magnus liber organi,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 25 (1972), 175–202.Google Scholar

Smith, N.E. “Interrelationships among the Graduals of the Magnus Liber Organi,” Acta Musicologica 45 (1973), 73–97.Google Scholar

Smith, N.E. “Tenor Repetition in the Notre Dame Organa,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 19 (1966), 329–51.Google Scholar

Staehelin, Martin, ed. Die mittelalterliche Musik-Handschrift W₁:Vollständige Reproduktion des “Notre Dame”-Manuskripts der Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel, Cod. Guelf. 628 Helmst., Wolfenbütteler Mittelalter-Studien 9. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1995.Google Scholar

Stenzl, Jürg et al. Perotinus magnus, Musik-Konzepte 107. Munich: Richard Bomberg, 2000.Google Scholar

Stenzl, J. et al. Die vierzig Clausulae der Handschrift Paris Bibliothèque nationale latin 15139 (Saint Victor-Clausulae), Publikationen der Schweizerischen Musikforschenden Gesellschaft II/22. Berne: Paul Haupt, 1970.Google Scholar

Thurston, Ethel, ed. The Music in the St. Victor Manuscript, Paris lat. 15139, Studies and Texts 5. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1959.Google Scholar

Tischler, Hans, ed. The Earliest Motets (to circa 1270): A Complete Comparative Edition, 2 vols. in 3. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Tischler, H., ed. The Parisian Two-Part Organa: The Complete Comparative Edition, 2 vols. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Treitler, Leo. “Regarding Meter and Rhythm in the Ars antiqua,” The Musical Quarterly 65 (1979), 524–58.Google Scholar

Treitler, L. With Voice and Pen: Coming to Know Medieval Song and How It was Made. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

van der Werf, Hendrik Integrated Directory of Organa, Clausulae, and Motets of the Thirteenth Century. Rochester, NY: The Author, 1989.Google Scholar

Waite, William G. “The Abbreviation of the Magnus liber,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 14 (1961), 147–58.Google Scholar

Waite, W. G. The Rhythm of Twelfth-Century Polyphony: Its Theory and Practice, Yale Studies in the History of Music 2. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Wegman, Rob C. “The World According to Anonymous iv,” in ‘Qui musicam in se habet’: Studies in Honor of Alejandro Enrique Planchart, AIM Miscellanea 9, ed. Bonnie Blackburn, Boorman, Stanley and Zayaruznaya, Anna. Middleton, WI: American Institute of Musicology, 2015, 693–730.Google Scholar

Wright, Craig. “The Feast of the Reception of the Relics at Notre Dame of Paris,” in Music and Tradition: Essays for John M. Ward, ed. Shapiro, A. Dhu. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985, 1–13.Google Scholar

Wright, C. “Leoninus, Poet and Musician,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 39 (1986), 1–35.Google Scholar

Wright, C. Music and Ceremony at Notre Dame of Paris, 500–1550. Cambridge Studies in Music. Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Yudkin, Jeremy “The Anonymous of St. Emmeram and Anonymous iv on the Copula,” The Musical Quarterly 70 (1984), 1–22.Google Scholar

Yudkin, J. “The Copula According to Johannes de Garlandia,” Musica Disciplina 34 (1980), 67–84.Google Scholar

Yudkin, J. “The Rhythm of Organum Purum,” Journal of Musicology 2 (1983), 355–76.Google Scholar

Yudkin, J. ed. De musica mensurata: The Anonymous of St. Emmeram, Complete Critical Edition, Translation, and Commentary. Music: Scholarship and Performance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Zaminer, Frieder. Der vatikanische Organum-Traktat (Ottob. lat. 3025): Organum-Praxis der frühen Notre Dame-Schule und ihrer Vorstufen, Münchner Veröffentlichungen zur Musikgeschichte 2. Tutzing: Hans Schneider, 1959.Google Scholar