Aluas, Luminita. “The Quatuor principalia musicae: A Critical Edition and Translation, with Introduction and Commentary,” 2 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 1996.Google Scholar

Anonymous iv. The Music Treatise of Anonymous IV: A New Translation, trans. Yudkin, Jeremy, Musicological Studies and Documents 41. Neuhausen-Stuttgart: American Institute of Musicology/Hänssler-Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar

Anonymous iv. Der Musiktraktat des Anonymus 4, ed. Reckow, Fritz, 2 vols., Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 5. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1967.Google Scholar

Apel, Willi. The Notation of Polyphonic Music 900–1600, 5th ed. Cambridge, MA: Mediaeval Academy of America, 1953.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Charles M. “Franco of Cologne on the Rhythm of Organum purum,” Early Music History 9 (1989), 1–26.Google Scholar

Baltzer, Rebecca A. “The Manuscript Makers of W1: Further Evidence for an Early Date,” in Quomodo cantabimus canticum? Studies in Honor of Edward H. Roesner, ed. Cannata, David Butler, Currie, Gabriela Ilnitchi, Mueller, Rena Charnin and Nádas, John Louis (Middleton, WI: American Institute of Musicology, 2008), 103–20.Google Scholar

Bank, J[oannes]. A. Tactus, Tempo and Notation in Mensural Music from the 13th to the 17th Century. Amsterdam: Annie Bank, 1972.Google Scholar

Bent, Margaret. “The Earliest Fifteenth-Century Transmission of English Music to the Continent,” in Essays on the History of English Music in Honour of John Caldwell: Sources, Style, Performance, Historiography, ed. Hornby, Emma and Maw, David. Woodbridge: Boydell, 2010, 83–96.Google Scholar

Bent, Margaret. “Notation, §III, 3. Polyphonic Mensural Notation, c. 1260–1500,” in NG2, vol. xviii: 129–40.Google Scholar

Bent, Margaret. “A Preliminary Assessment of the Independence of English Trecento Notations,” L’Ars nova italiana del Trecento 4 (1978), 65–82.Google Scholar

Bent, Margaret. “The Transmission of English Music,” in Kurt von Fischer zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. Eggebrecht, Hans Heinrich and Lüttolf, Max. Munich: Katzbichler, 1973.Google Scholar

Berger, Christian. Hexachord, Mensur und Textstruktur: Studien zum französischen Lied des 14. Jahrhunderts, Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 35. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1992.Google Scholar

Besseler, Heinrich and Gülke, Peter. Schriftbild der mehrstimmigen Musik, Musikgeschichte in Bildern 3/5. Leipzig: VEB Deutscher Verlag für Musik, 1973.Google Scholar

Bockholdt, Rudolf. “Semibrevis minima und Prolatio temporis: Zur Entstehung der Mensuraltheorie der Ars nova,” Musikforschung 16 (1963), 3–21.Google Scholar

Bradley, Catherine. “Contrafacta and Transcribed Motets: Vernacular Influences on Latin Motets and Clausulae in the Florence Manuscript,” Early Music History 32 (2013), 1–70.Google Scholar

Burkard, Thorsten and Huck, Oliver. “Voces applicatae verbis, Ein musikologischer und poetologischer Traktat aus dem 14. Jahrhundert (I-Vnm Lat. CI. XII.97 [4125]), Einleitung, Edition, Übersetzung und Kommentar,” Acta musicologica 74 (2002), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busse Berger, Anna Maria. Medieval Music and the Art of Memory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busse Berger, Anna Maria. Mensuration and Proportion Signs: Origins and Evolution, Oxford Monographs on Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Colette, Marie-Noëlle, Popin, Marielle, and Vendrix, Philippe. Histoire de la notation du Moyen Âge à la Renaissance, Musique ouverte. [Paris]: Minerve, 2003.Google Scholar

Crocker, Richard L. “Musica rhythmica and Musica metrica in Antique and Medieval Theory,” Journal of Music Theory 2 (1958), 2–23.Google Scholar

Desmond, Karen. “Did Vitry Write an Ars vetus et nova?” The Journal of Musicology 32 (2015), 441–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desmond, Karen. “New Light on Jacobus, Author of Speculum musicae,” Plainsong and Medieval Music 9 (2002), 19–40.Google Scholar

Di Bacco, Giuliano. “Original and Borrowed Authorship and Authority: Remarks on the Circulation of Philipoctus da Caserta’s Theoretical Legacy,” in A Late Medieval Songbook and Its Context: New Perspectives on the Chantilly Codex (Bibliothèque du Château de Chantilly, Ms. 564), ed. Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, Centre d’Études Supérieures de la Renaissance, Collection “Épitome musical.” Turnhout: Brepols, 2009, 329–64.Google Scholar

Dyer, Joseph. “A Thirteenth-Century Choirmaster: The ‘Scientia Artis Musicae’ of Elias Salomon,” The Musical Quarterly 66 (1980), 83–111.Google Scholar

Earp, Lawrence. “Cathedral and Court: Music under the Late Capetian and Valois Kings, to Louis XI,” in The Cambridge Companion to French Music, ed. Trezise, Simon, Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge University Press, 2015, 21–48.Google Scholar

Earp, Lawrence. “Interpreting the Deluxe Manuscript: Exigencies of Scribal Practice and Manuscript Production in Machaut,” in The Calligraphy of Medieval Music, ed. Haines, John, Musicalia Medii Aevi 1. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011, 223–40.Google Scholar

Ellsworth, Oliver B., ed. and trans. The Berkeley Manuscript: University of California Music Library, MS. 744 (olim Phillipps 4450), Greek and Latin Music Theory. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Everist, Mark. “From Paris to St. Andrews: The Origins of W₁,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 43 (1990), 1–42.Google Scholar

Everist, Mark. “A New Source for the Polyphony of the Ars subtilior: Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, nouvelles acquisitions françaises 22069,” in A Late Medieval Songbook and Its Context, ed. Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, 283–301.Google Scholar

Fallows, David. “The End of the Ars subtilior,” Basler Jahrbuch für historische Musikpraxis 20 (1996), 21–40.Google Scholar

Fassler, Margot E. “Accent, Meter, and Rhythm in Medieval Treatises ‘De rithmis,’” Journal of Musicology 5 (1987), 164–90.Google Scholar

Fassler, Margot E. “The Role of the Parisian Sequence in the Evolution of Notre-Dame Polyphony,” Speculum 62 (1987), 345–74.Google Scholar

Franco of Cologne. Ars cantus mensurabilis, ed. Reaney, Gilbert and Gilles, André, CSM 18. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1974.Google Scholar

Frobenius, Wolf. “Longa – brevis”; “Prolatio”; “Proprietas”; “Semibrevis,” in Handwörterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie, ed. Eggebrecht, Hans Heinrich. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1972–.Google Scholar

Fuller, Sarah. “A Phantom Treatise of the Fourteenth Century? The Ars nova,” Journal of Musicology 4 (1985–86), 23–50.Google Scholar

Fuller, Sarah. “Theoretical Foundations of Early Organum Theory,” Acta musicologica 53 (1981), 52–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallo, F. Alberto. “Die Notationslehre im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert,” in Die Mittelalterliche Lehre von der Mehrstimmigkeit, ed. Zaminer, Frieder, Geschichte der Musiktheorie 5. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1984, 257–356.Google Scholar

Gallo, F. Alberto. La teoria della notazione in Italia dalla fine del XIII all’inizio del XV secolo, Antiquae Musicae Italicae Subsidia Theoretica. Bologna: Tamari, 1966.Google Scholar

Gallo, F. Alberto, Gehring, Julia, and Huck, Oliver. “La notazione ‘italiana’ del Trecento,” Rivista italiana di musicologia 39 (2004), 235–70.Google Scholar

Gillingham, Bryan. Modal Rhythm, Musicological Studies 46. Ottawa: The Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1986.Google Scholar

Gozzi, Marco. “La cosiddetta ‘Longanotation’: Nuove prospettive sulla notazione italiana del Trecento,” Musica Disciplina 49 (1995), 121–49.Google Scholar

Gozzi, Marco. “New Light on Italian Trecento Notation Part 1: Sections i–iv.1,” Recercare 13 (2001), 5–78.Google Scholar

Gozzi, Marco. “On the Text–Music Relationship in the Italian Trecento: The Case of the Petrarchan Madrigal Non al so amante set by Jacopo da Bologna,” Polifonie 4 (2004), 197–222.Google Scholar

Gray, John. “The Ars Nova Treatises Attributed to Philippe de Vitry: Translation and Commentary,” 2 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, 1996.Google Scholar

Gross, Guillaume. Chanter en polyphonie à Notre-Dame de Paris aux 12e et 13e siècles, Studia Artistarum, Études sur la faculté des arts dans les universités médiévales 14. Turnhout: Brepols, 2007.Google Scholar

Gross, Guillaume. “Organum at Notre-Dame in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries: Rhetoric in Words and Music,” Plainsong and Medieval Music 15 (2006), 87–108.Google Scholar

de Machaut, Guillaume. Le Livre dou Voir Dit (The Book of the True Poem), ed. Leech-Wilkinson, Daniel, trans. Palmer, R. Barton, Garland Library of Medieval Literature 106A. New York and London: Garland, 1998.Google Scholar

Günther, Ursula. “Das Ende der Ars nova,” Musikforschung 16 (1963), 105–20.Google Scholar

Günther, Ursula. “Polymetric Rondeaux from Machaut to Dufay: Some Style-Analytical Observations,” in Studies in Musical Sources and Style: Essays in Honor of Jan LaRue, ed. Wolf, Eugene K. and Roesner, Edward H.. Madison, WI: A-R Editions, 1990, 75–108.Google Scholar

Haas, Max. “Die Musiklehre im 13. Jahrhundert von Johannes de Garlandia bis Franco,” in Die Mittelalterliche Lehre von der Mehrstimmigkeit, ed. Zaminer, Frieder, 89–159.Google Scholar

Haggh, Barbara and Michel Huglo, . “Magnus liber – Maius munus: origine et destinée du manuscrit F,” Revue de musicologie 90 (2004), 193–230.Google Scholar

Haines, John. “The Origins of the Musical Staff,” The Musical Quarterly 91 (2008), 327–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haines, John. “Proprietas and Perfection in Thirteenth-Century Music,” Theoria: Historical Aspects of Music Theory 15 (2008), 5–29.Google Scholar

Johannes, Hanboys. Summa, ed. and trans. Lefferts, Peter M. (with Robertus de Handlo, Regule). Lincoln; London: University of Nebraska Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Robertus de, Handlo. Regule (The Rules) …, ed. and trans. Lefferts, Peter M.. Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Harrison, Frank Ll. and Wibberley, Roger, eds. Manuscripts of Fourteenth-Century English Polyphony, Early English Church Music 26. London: Stainer & Bell, 1981.Google Scholar

Herlinger, Jan. “Music Theory of the Fourteenth and Early Fifteenth Centuries,” in Music as Concept and Practice in the Late Middle Ages, ed. Strohm, Reinhard and Blackburn, Bonnie J., New Oxford History of Music 3/1. Oxford University Press, 2001, 244–300.Google Scholar

Hiley, David and Payne, Thomas B.. “Notation, §III, 2. Polyphony and Secular Monophony to c. 1260,” in NG2, vol. xviii: 119–29.Google Scholar

Hirshberg, Jehoash. “Criticism of Music and Music as Criticism in the Chantilly Codex,” in A Late Medieval Songbook and Its Context, ed. Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, 133–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huck, Oliver. “‘Modus cantandi’ und Prolatio. ‘Aere ytalico’ und ‘aere gallico’ im Codex Rossi 215,” Die Musikforschung 54 (2001), 115–30.Google Scholar

Huck, Oliver. “Music for Luchino, Bernabò and Gian Galeazzo Visconti,” in Kontinuität und Transformation in der italienischen Vokalmusik zwischen Due- und Quattrocento, ed. Dieckmann, Sandra et al., Musica Mensurabilis 3. Hildesheim: Olms, 2007, 247–58.Google Scholar

Huck, Oliver. “Notation und Rhythmus im Tempus perfectum in der Musik des frühen Trecento,” Analecta musicologica 37 (2005), 41–56.Google Scholar

Hughes, Andrew and Bent, Margaret. The Old Hall Manuscript, 3 vols., CMM 46. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1973.Google Scholar

Huglo, Michel. “Règlement du XIII^e siècle pour la transcription des livres notés,” in Festschrift Bruno Stäblein zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Ruhnke, Martin. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1967, 121–33.Google Scholar

Jacobus of Liège. Speculum musicae, liber septimus, ed. Bragard, Roger, CSM 3. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1973.Google Scholar

de Garlandia, Johannes. De mensurabili musica, ed. Reimer, Eric, 2 vols., Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 10. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1972.Google Scholar

de Muris, Johannes. Ars practica mensurabili cantus secundum Iohannem de Muris: Die Recensio maior des sogenannten “Libellus practice cantus mensurabilis,” ed. Berktold, Christian, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Veröffentlichungen der Musikhistorischen Kommission 14. Munich: Beck’schen Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1999.Google Scholar

de Muris, Johannes. Notitia artis musicae … ed. Michels, Ulrich, CSM 17. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1972.Google Scholar

Kelly, Thomas Forrest. Capturing Music: The Story of Notation. New York: Norton, 2015.Google Scholar

Lambertus/Aristoteles. The “Ars musica” attributed to Magister Lambertus/Aristoteles, ed. Meyer, Christian, trans. Desmond, Karen, Royal Musical Association Monographs 27. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar

Leach, Elizabeth Eva. “Nature’s Forge and Mechanical Production: Writing, Reading and Performing Song,” in Rhetoric beyond Words: Delight and Persuasion in the Arts of the Middle Ages, ed. Carruthers, Mary J., Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 78. Cambridge University Press, 2010, 72–95.Google Scholar

Lefferts, Peter M. “An Anonymous Treatise of the Theory of Frater Robertus de Brunham,” in Quellen und Studien zur Musiktheorie des Mittelalters, vol. iii, ed. Bernhard, Michael. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2001.Google Scholar

Lefferts, Peter M. The Motet in the Fourteenth Century, Studies in Musicology 94. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Lerch, Irmgard. “Mensuralnotation zwischen Ars antiqua und Ars nova,” Musica Disciplina 54 (2004), 5–38.Google Scholar

Long, Michael. “Musical Tastes in Fourteenth-Century Italy: Notational Styles, Scholarly Traditions, and Historical Circumstances.” Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 1981.Google Scholar

Losseff, Nicola. The Best Concords: Polyphonic Music in Thirteenth-Century Britain, Outstanding Dissertations in Music from British Universities. New York; London: Garland, 1994.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Friedrich. “Excurs II: Die der Darstellung des Rhythmus dienende Differenzierung in der Schreibung der Notengruppen in der Quadrat-Notation; die Herrschaft der modalen Rhythmen in den rhythmisch strengeren melismatischen Partien der Organa, in den ältesten Motetten in ganzem Umfang und in einigen Gattungen der 1 stimmigen Lieder,” in Repertorium organorum recentioris et motetorum vetustissimi stili, ed. Dittmer, Luther A.. New York: Institute of Mediaeval Music; Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964, vol. i.1: 42–57.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Friedrich. “[Review of Wolf, Geschichte der Mensural-Notation],” in Sammelbände der Internationalen Musik-Gesellschaft 6 (1904–05), 597–641Google Scholar

Lütteken, Laurenz. “Notation. vi.1–4. Mensuralnotation,” in MGG2, Sachteil, vol. vii: cols. 323–35.Google Scholar

Marchettus of Padua. Pomerium, ed. Vecchi, Giuseppe, CSM 6. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1961.Google Scholar

Michels, Ulrich. Die Musiktraktate des Johannes de Muris, Beihefte zum Arkiv für Musikwissenschaft 8. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1970.Google Scholar

Nádas, John and Ziino, Agostino, eds. The Lucca Codex (Codice Mancini): Lucca, Archivio di Stato, MS 184; Perugia, Biblioteca Comunale Augusta, MS 3065: Introductory Study and Facsimile Edition, Ars Nova 1. Lucca: Libreria Musicale Italiana, 1990.Google Scholar

Norwood, Patricia P. “Evidence Concerning the Provenance of the Bamberg Codex,” Journal of Musicology 8 (1990), 491–504.Google Scholar

Odington, Walter. De speculatione musicae, Part vi, trans. Huff, Jay A., Musicological Studies and Documents 31. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1973.Google Scholar

Odington, Walter. Summa de speculatione musica, ed. Hammond, Frederick F., CSM 14. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1970.Google Scholar

Page, Christopher. Discarding Images: Reflections on Music and Culture in Medieval France. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Page, Christopher. Latin Poetry and Conductus Rhythm in Medieval France, Royal Musical Association Monographs 8. London: Royal Musical Association, 1997.Google Scholar

Parrish, Carl. The Notation of Medieval Music. New York: Norton, 1959; reprint New York: Pendragon, 1978.Google Scholar

Philip the Chancellor. Motets and Prosulas, ed. Payne, Thomas B., Recent Researches in Music of the Middle Ages and Early Renaissance 41. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions, 2011.Google Scholar

Pinegar, Sandra. “Textual and Conceptual Relationships among Theoretical Writings on Mensurable Music of the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1991.Google Scholar

Pirrotta, Nino. “Marchettus de Padua and the Italian Ars nova,” Musica Disciplina 9 (1955), 57–71.Google Scholar

Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, eds. Codex Chantilly, Bibliothèque du château de Chantilly, Ms. 564, Introduction, Collection “Épitome musical.” Turnhout: Brepols, 2008.Google Scholar

Rastall, Richard. The Notation of Western Music: An Introduction. London: Dent, 1983.Google Scholar

Reckow, Fritz. “Proprietas und Perfectio: Zur Geschichte des Rhythmus, seiner Aufzeichnung und Terminologie im 13. Jahrhundert,” Acta musicologica 39 (1967), 115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ristory, Heinz. Denkmodelle zur französischen Mensuraltheorie des 14. Jahrhunderts. Vol. i, Historische Darstellung, Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen / Musicological Studies 81/1. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 2004.Google Scholar

Roesner, Edward H. “The Emergence of Musica mensurabilis,” in Studies in Musical Sources and Style: Essays in Honor of Jan LaRue., ed. Wolf, Eugene K. and Roesner, Edward H.. Madison, WI: A-R Editions, 1990, 41–74.Google Scholar

Roesner, Edward H. “The Music in MS fr. 146,” in Le Roman de Fauvel in the Edition of Mesire Chaillou de Pesstain: A Reproduction in Facsimile of the Complete Manuscript Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, Fonds Français 146, eds. Roesner, Edward H., Avril, François, and Regalado, Nancy Freeman. New York: Broude Brothers, 1990.Google Scholar

Roesner, Edward H. “The Performance of Parisian Organum,” Early Music 7 (1979), 174–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, Ernest H. “Duple Rhythm and Alternate Third Mode in the 13th Century,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 15 (1962), 249–91.Google Scholar

Sanders, Ernest H. “Rithmus,” in Essays on Medieval Music in Honor of David G. Hughes, ed. Boone, Graeme M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995, 415–40.Google Scholar

Stoessel, Jason. “The Captive Scribe: The Context and Culture of Scribal and Notational Process in the Music of the Ars subtilior.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of New England, Armidale, Australia, 2002.Google Scholar

Stoessel, Jason. “Symbolic Innovation: The Notation of Jacob de Senleches,” Acta Musicologica 71 (1999), 136–64.Google Scholar

Stone, Anne. “Che cosa c’è di più sottile riguardo l’Ars subtilior?” Rivista italiana di musicologia 31 (1996), 3–31.Google Scholar

Stone, Anne. “The Composer’s Voice in the Late Fourteenth-Century Song: Four Case Studies,” in Johannes Ciconia: Musicien de la transition, ed. Vendrix, Philippe. Turnhout: Brepols, 2003, 179–87.Google Scholar

Stone, Anne. “Glimpses of the Unwritten Tradition in some Ars subtilior Works,” Musica Disciplina 50 (1996), 59–93.Google Scholar

Stone, Anne. “Writing Rhythm in Late Medieval Italy: Notation and Musical Style in the Manuscript Modena, Biblioteca Estense, Alpha.M.5.24.” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 1994.Google Scholar

Tanay, Dorit. “Between the Fig Tree and the Laurel: Or voit tout en aventure Revisited,” in A Late Medieval Songbook and Its Context, ed. Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, 161–78.Google Scholar

Tanay, Dorit. Noting Music, Marking Culture: The Intellectual Context of Rhythmic Notation, 1250–1400, Musicological Studies and Documents 46. Holzgerlingen: American Institute of Musicology/Hänssler-Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar

Traub, Andreas. “Notation. v. Modalnotation,” in MGG2, Sachteil, vol. vii: cols. 317–23.Google Scholar

Vecchi, Giuseppe. ed. “Anonimi Rubrice breves,” Quadrivium 10 (1969), 125–34.Google Scholar

Whitcomb, Pamela. “Teachers, Booksellers and Taxes: Reinvestigating the Life and Activities of Johannes de Garlandia,” Plainsong and Medieval Music 8 (1999), 1–13Google Scholar

Wibberley, Roger. “Notation in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries,” in Manuscripts of Fourteenth-Century English Polyphony, ed. Harrison, Frank Ll. and Wibberley, Roger, xix–xxviii.Google Scholar

Wolf, Johannes. Geschichte der Mensural-Notation von 1250–1460. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1904.Google Scholar

Wright, Craig. Music at the Court of Burgundy 1364–1419: A Documentary History, Musicological Studies 28. Henryville, PA: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1979.Google Scholar