Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:46:44.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The vocation of criticism and the crisis of the republic of letters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Jon Klancher
Edited by
Marshall Brown
Marshall Brown
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

To whom did the critic speak, and who could occupy the office of ‘critic’? This chapter explores the roles of men and women of ‘letters’ in the Romantic age as a framework for understanding the vocation of Romantic criticism. Until the beginning of the nineteenth century, critics and reviewers of poetry, drama or the novel worked within the wider context of two closely related early modern categories: ‘polite literature’ and the ‘republic of letters’. The crisis of both categories, between 1780 and 1830, produced changes in culture and criticism that would profoundly alter the status of literature itself in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. ‘Polite letters’ embraced the genres of historiography, natural philosophy, moral philosophy and political discourse as well as poetry, drama and criticism itself, while significantly excluding the new genre of the novel. Resting on this basis, the early modern idea of a ‘republic of letters’ defined a territory that existed on no European map – an ‘elusive, often deliberately mysterious domain’, as Elizabeth Eisenstein remarks – yet shaped the self-understanding of European criticism until the last decade of the eighteenth century.

At that point, the historian's road map to the republic of letters becomes more obscure. By 1800 its authority over the organization of reading and writing seems to have diminished as quickly as Edmund Burke's ‘political Men of Letters’ were discredited in the French Revolution controversy of the 1790s. Instead of an idealized unity of critical reasoners embedded in modern print culture, the republic of letters became in the Romantic age a confusing clash of those ‘sects and systems’ that, according to David Hume, the early modern republic had triumphantly suppressed.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 296 - 320
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Meyer H., The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition, New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Arac, Jonathan, Critical genealogies: historical situations for postmodern literary studies, New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Aske, Martin, ‘Critical disfigurings; the “jealous leer malign” in Romantic criticism’, in Questioning Romanticism, Beer, John (ed.), Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Baillie, Joanna, ‘Preface’ to A series of plays, 1798, rpt. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Barbauld, Anna Letitia (ed.), The British novelists, 50 vols., London: Rivington, 1810.Google Scholar
Barrell, John, English literature in history, 1730–80: an equal, wide survey, London: Hutchinson, 1983.Google Scholar
Barrell, John, The political theory of painting from Reynolds to Hazlitt: ‘the body of the public’, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, German Romantic literary theory, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrendt, Stephen C., Shelley and his audiences, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C., Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: the genesis of modern German political thought, 1790–1820, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (ed. and trans.), The early political writings of the German Romantics, Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghahn, Klaus L., ‘From Classicist to Classical literary criticism, 1730–1806’, Blazer, John R. (trans.), in Hohendahl, Peter Uwe (ed.), A history of German literary criticism, 1730–1980, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bialostosky, Don H., Wordsworth, dialogics, and the practice of criticism, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Brinton, CraneThe political ideas of the English Romantics, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1966Google Scholar
Bromwich, David, ‘Romantic poetry and the Edinburgh ordinances’, Yearbook of English studies 19 (1989).Google Scholar
Bromwich, David, Hazlitt: the mind of a critic, Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France, O'Brien, Conor Cruise (ed.), Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, ‘Culture's medium: the role of the review’, in Curran, Stuart (ed.), The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, rebels, and reactionaries: English literature and its background, 1760–1830, New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Bygrave, Stephen, ‘Land of the giants: gaps, limits and audiences in Coleridge's Biographia literaria’, in Beyond Romanticism: new approaches to texts and contexts, 1780–1832, London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Carlson, Julie A., In the theatre of Romanticism: Coleridge, nationalism, women, Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas, Critical and miscellaneous essays, Traill, Henry DuC (ed.), London: Chapman & Hall, 1899.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas, On heroes, hero-worship and the heroic in history, New York: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Chandler, James K., ‘Representative men, spirits of the age, and other Romantic types’, in Johnston, Kenneth R. et al. (eds.), Romantic revolutions: criticism and theory, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Chandler, James K., Wordsworth's second nature: a study of the poetry and politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Christensen, Jerome, Coleridge's blessed machine of language, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Christensen, Jerome, Lord Byron's strength: Romantic writing and commercial society, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Christensen, Jerome, Practicing enlightenment: Hume and the formation of a literary career, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas (eds.), Romanticism and the sciences, Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine ‘The ideal and reality of the republic of letters’ Science in context 4 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas, The collected writings of Thomas de Quincey, new edn, Masson, David (ed.), 14 vols., Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black, 1889–90.Google Scholar
D'Israeli, Isaac, Curiosities of literature: consisting of anecdotes, characters, sketches and observations, literary, critical and historical, London: Murray, 1791.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, The function of criticism: from ‘The spectator’ to post-structuralism, London: Verso, 1984.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, ElizabethThe printing revolution in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, 1983Google Scholar
Engell, James, The creative imagination: Enlightenment to Romanticism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelsing, Rolf, Analphabetentum und Lektüre: zur Sozialgeschichte des Lesens in Deutschland zwischen feudaler und industrieller Gesellschaft, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1973.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Fichte: early philosophical writings, Breazeale, Daniel (ed. and trans.), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, The characteristics of the present age, in Smith, William (trans.), Popular works of Johann Gottlieb Fichte, London: Trübner, 1889, II.Google Scholar
Women critics, 1660–1820: an anthology, Folger, Collective on Early Women Critics (ed.), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Friedrichsmeyer, Sara, ‘Caroline Schlegel-Schelling: “a good woman, and no heroine”’, in Goodman, Katherine R. and Waldstein, Edith (eds.), In the shadow of Olympus: German women writers around 1800, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, Edmund Burke's aesthetic ideology: language, gender, and political economy in revolution, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmartin, Kevin, Print politics: the press and radical opposition in early nineteenthcentury England, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Godwin, William, The enquirer: reflections on education, manners, and literature, London: Robinson, 1797.Google Scholar
Goldgar, AnneImpolite learning: conduct and community in the republic of letters, 1680-1750, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Oliver, Collected works of Oliver Goldsmith, Friedman, Arthur (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966, 5 vols.Google Scholar
Goodman, Dena, The republic of letters: a cultural history of the French Enlightenment, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Goodman, Dena, The republic of letters: a cultural history of the French Enlightenment, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Greig, J. Y. T. (ed.), The letters of David Hume, Oxford, 1932, I:Google Scholar
Gross, John, The rise and fall of the man of letters: aspects of English literary life since 1800, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1969.Google Scholar
Guillory, John, Cultural capital: the problem of literary canon formation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, Burger, Thomas (trans.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Paul, Coleridge's poetics, Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Heyck, T[homas] W[illiam], The transformation of intellectual life in Victorian England, London: Croom Helm, 1982.Google Scholar
Hogle, Jerrold E., Shelley's process: radical transference and the development of his major works, New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hohendahl, Peter (ed.), A history of German literary criticism, 1730–1980, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hunt, Leigh, Leigh Hunt's literary criticism, Houtchens, Lawrence Huston and Houtchens, Carolyn Washburn (eds.), New York: Columbia University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Izenberg, Gerald N., Impossible individuality: Romanticism, revolution, and the origins of modern selfhood, 1787–1802, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobus, Mary, ‘The art of managing books’, in Reed, Arden (ed.), Romanticism and language, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis, Contributions to the ‘Edinburgh review’, London: Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans, 1854.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, The Yale edition of the works of Samuel Johnson, Bate, W. J. et al. (eds.), New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1958–, 20 vols.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of judgment, Pluhar, Werner S. (trans.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Perpetual peace, and other essays on politics, history, and morals, Humphrey, Ted (trans.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1983.Google Scholar
Kinnaird, John, William Hazlitt, critic of power, New York: Columbia University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Kirchstein, MaxKlopstocks deutsche Gelehrtenrepublik, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1928.Google Scholar
Klancher, Jon P., The making of English reading audiences, 1790–1832, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc, The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German Romanticism, Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cherel (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Leask, Nigel, The politics of imagination in Coleridge's critical thought, New York: St Martin's Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Joseph M., The battle of the books: history and literature in the Augustan age, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Mann, MichaelThe sources of social power, Cambridge University Press, 1986, II:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marino, Adrian, ‘Literature and ideology in the republic of letters’, in Jost, François (ed.), Aesthetics and the literature of ideas: essays in honor of A. Owen Aldridge, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Mathias, T[homas] J[ames], The pursuits of literature: a satirical poem in four dialogues, with notes, 12th edn, London: Becket, 1808.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome J., Social values and poetic acts: the historical judgment of literary work, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., ‘A criticism of their own: Romantic women literary critics’, in Beer, John (ed.), Questioning Romanticism, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., Romanticism & gender, New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Park, Roy, Hazlitt and the spirit of the age: abstraction and critical theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Pfau, Thomas, Wordsworth's profession: form, class, and the logic of early Romantic cultural production, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary, The proper lady and the woman writer: ideology and style in the works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Reeve, Clara, The progress of romance through times, countries, and manners, 1785, rpt. New York: Garland, 1970.Google Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J., The meaning of literature, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Roper, Derek, Reviewing before the ‘Edinburgh’, 1788–1802, London: Methuen, 1978.Google Scholar
Rose, Mark, Authors and owners: the invention of copyright, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, On the aesthetic education of man, Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, L. A. (trans.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Behler, Ernst (ed.), Munich: Schöningh, 1958–.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Literary notebooks, 1797–1801, Eichner, Hans (ed.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Philosophical fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schoenfield, Mark, ‘Regulating standards: the Edinburgh review and the circulations of judgement’, Wordsworth circle 24 (1993).Google Scholar
Schoenfield, Mark, The professional Wordsworth: law, labor, and the poet's contract, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schulte-Sasse, Jochen, ‘The concept of literary criticism in German Romanticism, 1795–1810’, in Hohendahl, Peter Uwe (ed.), Ahistory of German literary criticism, 1730–1980, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Schulte-Sasse, Jochen et al. (eds.), Theory as practice: a critical anthology of early German Romantic writings, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Seyhan, Azade, Representation and its discontents: the critical legacy of German Romanticism, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, Shelley's prose, or The trumpet of a prophecy, Clark, David Lee (ed.), Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, The prose works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Murray, E. B. (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, David, Romanticism, nationalism and the revolt against theory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Simpson, David (ed.), The origins of modern critical thought: German aesthetic and literary criticism from Lessing to Hegel, Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Simpson, David (ed.), The origins of modern critical thought: German aesthetics and literary criticism from Lessing to Hegel, Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Siskin, Clifford, The work of writing: literature and social change in Britain, 1700–1830, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Staël, Madame, De la littérature considerée dans ses rapports avec les institutions sociales, Paris: Maradan, 1800 (trans. A treatise on ancient and modern literature, London: George Cawthorn, 1803, 2 vols.).Google Scholar
Swann, Karen, ‘Literary gentlemen and lovely ladies: the debate on the character of Christabel’, ELH 52 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, Thomas, ‘To the public’, Analytical review 1 (1788).Google Scholar
Wellek, René, A history of modern criticism: 1750–1950, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1955, 8 vols.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary, A vindication of the rights of woman, Kramnick, Miriam Brody (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha, The author, art, and the market: rereading the history of aesthetics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Zionkowski, Linda, ‘Territorial disputes in the republic of letters: canon formation and the literary profession’, The eighteenth century: theory and interpretation 31 (1990).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×