Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:44:30.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Structuralism of the Prague School

from STRUCTURALISM: ITS RISE, INFLUENCE AND AFTERMATH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Lubomír Doležel
Edited by
Raman Selden
Lubomír Doležel
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

The groundwork of structural poetics laid by the Russian Formalists was developed into the first system of twentieth-century literary structuralism by scholars of the Cercle linguistique de Prague (Prague Linguistic Circle – PLC). The personal and theoretical links between the Russian and the Prague schools are well known. Jan Mukařovský, the most prominent literary theorist of Prague, acknowledged that the conceptual system of his first major work – the May monograph of 1928 – originated with the Russian Formalists (Kapitoly, II, p. 12). Later on, in his review of the Czech translation of Shklovsky's Theory of Prose (published in 1934) Mukařovský summed up not only the Czech indebtedness to, but also the Czech criticism of, early Russian Formalism (‘K českému překladu’, Kapitoly, I, pp. 344–50; Steiner, The Word, pp. 134–42). The first president of the PLC, Vilém Mathesius, surveying the first ten years of the Circle's activities in 1936, highly commended the contribution of Russian scholars, but emphasized the domestic sources of Prague School thought. He strongly protested the claim that the work done in Prague was nothing more than an application of Russian linguistic and literary-theoretical trends; the ‘working symbiosis’ achieved in the Circle is a ‘mutual give and take’ (‘Deset let’, pp. 149ff.; cf. Renský, ‘Roman Jakobson’, p. 380). In the same year, Roman Jakobson, who was a member of both Schools, spoke as well of a ‘symbiosis of Czech and Russian thought’, but pointed also to influences from Western European and American science.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 31 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, Daniel, and Schooneveld, C. H. (eds.), Roman Jakob son. Echoes of His Scholarship (Lisse, 1977).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen and Bowlt, John E. (eds.), Russian Formalism (Edinburgh, 1973).Google Scholar
Bastide, Roger (ed.), Sens et usage du terme structure dans les sciences humaines et sociales, 2nd edn (The Hague, 1972).Google Scholar
Bogatyrjov, Petr, Funkcie kroja na Maravskom Slovensku (Turčiansky sv. Martin, 1937); The Functions of Folk Costume in Moravian Slovakia, trans. Crum, Richard G. (The Hague, 1971).Google Scholar
Bojtár, Endre, Slavic Structuralism (Amsterdam, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broekman, Jan M., Strukturalismus. Moskau – Prag – Paris (Freiburg, 1971).Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl, Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache (Jena, 1934).Google Scholar
Bulygina, T. B., ‘Pražskaja lingvističeskaja škola’ [The Prague Linguistic School], Guchman, in M. M. and Jarceva, V. N. (eds.), Osnovnye napravlenija strukturalizma (Moscow, 1964).Google Scholar
Bulygina, T. B., ‘Pražskaja lingvističeskaja škola’ [The Prague Linguistic School], Guchman, in M. M. and Jarceva, V. N. (eds.), Osnovnye napravlenija strukturalizma (Moscow, 1964).Google Scholar
Burg, Peter, Jan Mukařovský. Genese und System der tschechischen strukturalen Asthetik (Munich, 1985).Google Scholar
Červenka, Miroslav, ‘Die Grundkategorien des Prager literaturwissenschaftlichen Strukturalismus’, in Žmegač, and Škreb, (eds.), Kritik.
Červenka, Miroslav, ‘Die Grundkategorien des Prager literaturwissenschaftlichen Strukturalismus’, in Žmegač, and Škreb, (eds.), Kritik.
Červenka, Miroslav, ‘O Vodicčkově metodologii literárnich dejin’ [On Vodička's methodology of literary history], in F. Vodička, Struktura vývoje (Prague, 1969).Google Scholar
Červenka, Miroslav, ‘O Vodicčkově metodologii literárnich dejin’ [On Vodička's methodology of literary history], in F. Vodička, Struktura vývoje (Prague, 1969).Google Scholar
Červenka, Miroslav, ‘Semantic contexts’, Poetics, 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Červenka, Miroslav, and Jankovič, Milan (eds.), The Prague Structuralist School Its History and Future (forthcoming).
Chatman, Seymour, and Levin, Samuel R., ‘Linguistics and literature’, in Sebeok, (ed.), Trends, X.
Cherry, Collin, On Human Communication (Cambridge, MA, New York, London, 1957).Google Scholar
Chvatfk, Květoslav, ‘Semiotics of a literary work of art. Dedicated to the 90th birthday of Jan Mukařovský (1981–1975)’, Semiotica, 37 (1981).Google Scholar
Chvatfk, Květoslav, Tschechoslowakischer Strukturalismus. Theorie und Geschichte (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
Cohen, Ralph, The Art of Discrimination. Thomson's The Seasons and the Language of Criticism (London, 1964).Google Scholar
Danesš, František, ‘On linguistic strata (levels)’, in Travaux linguistiques de Prague, IV (1971).Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomfír, Narrative Modes in Czech Literature (Toronto, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir, ‘Roman Jakobson as a student of communication’, in Proceedings of the Roman Jakobson Colloquium (Rome, 1990).Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir, Narrative Modes in Czech Literature (Toronto, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir, Occidental Poetics. Tradition and Progress (Lincoln, NE, 1990).Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto, ‘The influence of Roman Jakobson on the development of semiotics’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson.
Effenberger, Vratislav, ‘Roman Jakobson and the Czech avant-garde between two wars’, American Journal of Semiotics, 2, (1983), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effenberger, Vratislav, ‘Roman Jakobson and the Czech avant-garde between two wars’, American Journal of Semiotics, 2, (1983), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eng, Jan, ‘The effectiveness of the aesthetic function’, in Steiner, , Červenka, and Vroon, (eds.), Structure.
Erlich, Victor, Russian Formalism. History–Doctrine, 2nd edn. (The Hague, 1965).Google Scholar
Peer, Willie, ‘Bühlers Organon-Modell und die Semiotik der Kunst’, in Eschbach, (ed.), Bühler-Studien, I.
Eschbach, Achim (ed.), Bühler-Studien, 2 vols. (Frankfurt-on-Main, 1984).Google Scholar
Fieguth, Rolf, ‘Rezeption contra falsches und richtiges Lesen? Oder Missverstä-nisse mit Ingarden’, Sprache im technischen Zeitalter, 37 (1971).Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika, Bedeutung. Probleme einer semiotischen Hermeneutik und Asthetik (Munich, 1979).Google Scholar
Flaker, Aleksandar, ‘Der russische Formalismus – Theorie und Wirkung’, in Žmegač, and Škreb, (eds.), Zur Kritik.
Fokkema, D. W., and Kunne-Ibsch, Elrud, Theories of Literature in the Twentieth Century (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Fokkema, D. W., and Kunne-Ibsch, Elrud, ‘The reception of literature: theory and practice of “Rezeptionsästhetik”’, in Theories of Literature in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Fontaine, Jacqueline, Le Cercle linguistique de Prague (Tours, 1974).Google Scholar
Galan, F. W., Historic Structures (Austin, 1984).Google Scholar
Garvin, Paul L., ‘Karl Bühler's contribution to the theory of linguistics’, The Journal of General Psychology, 75, (1966).Google Scholar
Garvin, Paul ‘Rôle des linguistes de l'Ecole de Prague dans le développment de la norme linguistique tchèque’ in Bérard, Edith and Maurais, Jacques (eds.), La norme linguistique (Québec, 1983).Google Scholar
Garvin, Paul L. (ed. and trans.), A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and Style (Washington, 1964).Google Scholar
Glowiński, Michal, ‘On concretization’, in Odmark, (ed.), Language.
Grygar, Mojmír, ‘Semantische Mehrdeutigkeit des dichterischen Textes. Zur strukturellen Analyse der Dichtung “Mai” von K. H. Mácha’, Tijdschrift voor slavische taal- en letterkunde, 1 (1972).Google Scholar
Grygar, Mojmír, ‘The role of personality in literary development’, in Steiner, , Červenka, and Vroon, (eds.), Structure.
Günther, Hans, Struktur als Prozess (Munich, 1973).Google Scholar
Günther, Hans, (ed.), Zeichen und Funktion. Beiträge zur ästhetischen Konzeption Jan Mukařovskýs (Munich, 1986).Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K, Explorations in the Functions of Language (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav, ‘Úkoly spisovného jazyka a jeho kultura’ [The tasks of standard language and its culture] (1932), Studie; Eng. trans, in Garvin, (ed.), Reader,; rpt. in Vachek, and Dušková, (eds.), Praguiana.Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav, ‘Funkce spisovného jazyka’ [Functions of standard language] (1929), Studie.Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav, ‘K funkčnímu rozvrstvení spisovného jazyka’ [On functional differentiation of standard language] (1942), Studie.Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav, Studie o spisovném jazyce [Studies on standard language] (Prague, 1963).Google Scholar
Holenstein, Elmar, ‘On the poetry and the plurifunctionality of language’, in Smith, (ed.), Structure and Gestalt.
Holenstein, Elmar, Roman Jakob son's Approach to Language. Phenomenological Structuralism (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar
Horálek, Karel, ‘Les fonctions de la langue et de la parole’, in Travaux linguistiques de Prague, I (Prague, 1964).Google Scholar
Hrushovski, Benjamin, ‘Poetics, criticism, science’, PTL – A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, (1976).Google Scholar
Ihwe, Jens, Linguistik in der Literaturwissenschaft (Munich, 1972).Google Scholar
Man, Paul, ‘Introduction’ to Jauss, Robert, Toward an Aesthetic of Reception (Brighton, 1982).Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. V., ‘Growth of the theoretical framework of modern poetics’, in Sebeok, (ed.), Trends, XII.
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Co je poesie?’ [What is poetry?] (1934); Eng. trans, in Language.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Die Arbeit der sogenannten “Prager Schule'” (1936), SW, II.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Efforts towards a means-ends model of language in European linguistics of the inter-war period’, in Mohrmann, Gh., Norman, F. and Sommerfelt, A. (eds.), Trends in Modern Linguistics (Utrecht-Antwerp, 1963).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Language in operation’, in L'Aventure de l'esprit. Mélanges Alexandre Koyré (Paris, 1964), II, SW, III.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Linguistics and communication theory’, in Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects (Providence, RI, 1961), SW, II.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Linguistics and poetics’, in Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in Language (New York, 1960), SW, III.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘On linguistic aspects of translation’, in Brower, R. A. (ed.), On Translation (Cambridge, MA, 1959), SW, II.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘On the relation between visual and auditory signs’, in Proceedings of the AFCRL Symposium on Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form (Boston, 1967), SW, II.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Randbemerkungen zur Prosa des Dichters Pasternak’ (1935); Eng. trans, in Language.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Randbemerkungen zur Prosa des Dichters Pasternak’ (1935); Eng. trans, in Language.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Socha v symbolice Puškinově’ [The statue in Pushkin's poetic mythology] (1937); Eng. trans, in Language.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Staročeský verš’ [Old Czech verse] (1934); Eng. trans, in Selected Writings (SW), VI.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Zeichen und System der Sprache’ (1962), SW, II.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Language in Literature (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Questions de poétique (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Selected Writings (SW), 8 vols. (The Hague, 1966–1988).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, The Framework of Language (Ann Arbor, MI, 1980).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Pomorska, Krystyna, Dialogues (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (ed.), N. S. Trubeckofs Letters and Notes (The Hague, 1975).Google Scholar
Jankovič, Milan, ‘Perspectives of semantic gesture’, Poetics, 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Jankovič, Milan, ‘Perspectives of semantic gesture’, Poetics, 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert, Literaturgeschichte als Provokation, 2nd edn (Frankfurt-on-Main, 1970), Eng. trans. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception (Brighton, 1982).Google Scholar
Jefferson, Ann, ‘Structuralism and posts tructuralism’, in Jefferson, and Robey, (eds.), Modern Literary Theory.
Jefferson, Ann and Robey, David (eds.), Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Kalivoda, Robert, ‘Zur Typologie der Funktionen und zum Konzept eines totalen Funktionalismus’, in Gunther, (ed.), Zeichen.
Lerner, Daniel (ed.), Parts and Wholes (New York, 1963).Google Scholar
Linhartová, Věra, ‘La place de Roman Jakobson dans la vie littéraire et artistique Tchécoslovaque’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson.
Linhartová, Věra, ‘La place de Roman Jakobson dans la vie littéraire et artistique Tchécoslovaque’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson.
Martens, Gunter, ‘Textstrukturen aus rezeptionsästhetischer Sicht. Perspektiven einer Textästhetik auf der Grundlage des Prager Strukturalismus’, Wirkendes Wort, 25 (1973).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav, ‘Postscript: Prague School semiotics’, in Matejka, L. and Titunik, I. R. (eds.), Semiotics of Art. Prague School Contributions (Cambridge, MA, 1976).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav, ‘Postscript: Prague School semiotics’, in Matejka, L. and Titunik, I. R. (eds.), Semiotics of Art. Prague School Contributions (Cambridge, MA, 1976).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav, Crossroads of Sound and Meaning (Lisse, 1975).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav (ed.), Sound, Sign and Meaning. Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle (Ann Arbor, MI, 1978).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav and Titunik, Irwin R. (eds.), Semiotics of Art. Prague School Contributions (Cambridge, MA, 1976).Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém ‘Deset let Pražskeho linguistickeℏo kroužku’ [Ten years of the Prague Linguistic Circle] (1936), qtd. from Eng. trans, in Vachek, J., The Linguistic School of Prague (Bloomington, 1966).Google Scholar
Mayenowa, Maria Renata, ‘Classic statements of the semiotic theory of art: Mukařovský and Morris’, in Matejka, (ed.), Sound.
Mercks, Kees, ‘The semantic gesture and the guinea pigs’, in Amsenga, B. J. et al. (eds.), Voz'mi na radosf. To Honour Jeanne van der Eng-liedmeier (Amsterdam, 1980).Google Scholar
Mercks, Kees, ‘The semantic gesture and the guinea pigs’, in Amsenga, B. J. et al. (eds.), Voz'mi na radosf. To Honour Jeanne van der Eng-liedmeier (Amsterdam, 1980).Google Scholar
Merquior, J. G., From Prague to Paris. A Critique of Structuralist and Post-structuralist Thought (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Možejko, Edward, ‘Slovak theory of literary communication: notes on the Nitra school of literary criticism’, PTL – A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 4 (1979).Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Básník’ [The poet] (1941), Studie z estetiky; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Dénomination poétique et la fonction esthétique de la langue’, in Hjelmslev, L. et al. (eds.), Actes du IVe Congrès international des linguistes (Copenhagen, 1936); Czech trans, in Kapitoly, I; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Dialog a monolog’ [Dialogue and monologue] (1940), Kapitoly, I; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Estetika jazyka’ [Aesthetics of language] (1940), Kapitoly, I.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Genetika smyslu v Máchově poesii’ [Genesis of sense in Mácha's poetry] (1938), Kapitoly, III.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Jazyk spisovný a jazyk básnický’ [Standard language and poetic language], in Havránek, B. and Weingart, M. (eds.), Spisovná čeština a jazyková kultura (Prague, 1932); Eng. trans, (part) in Garvin, , ReaderGoogle Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Jazyk spisovný a jazyk básnický’ [Standard language and poetic language], in Havránek, B. and Weingart, M. (eds.), Spisovná čeština a jazyková kultura (Prague, 1932); Eng. trans, (part) in Garvin, , Reader.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘K českému překladu Šklovského Teorie prózy’ [A note on the Czech translation of Shklovsky's Theory of Prose] (1934), Kapitoly, I; Eng. trans. in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘K pojmosloví československé teorie uměni’ [On the conceptural system of the Czechoslovak theory of art] (1947), Kapitoly, I.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘K pojmosloví československé teorie uměni’ [On the conceptural system of the Czechoslovak theory of art] (1947), Kapitoly, I.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘K problému funkci v architektuře’ [On the problem of functions in architecture] (1937/1938), Studie z estetiky; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘L'Art comme fait sémiologique’, in Actes du huitième Congrès international de philosophic (Prague, 1936); trans, Czech, in Studie zestetiky; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Mfísto estetické funkce mezi ostatními’ [The place of the aesthetic function among the other functions] (1942), Studie z estetiky; Eng. trans. in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Nové nèmecké dílo o základech literárni vědy’ [A new German work on the foundations of the science of literature] (1939), Studie z poetiky.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘O strukturalismu’ [On structuralism] (1946), Studie z estetiky,; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Obecné zaásady a vývoj novocečeského verše’ [General principles and evolution of modern Czech verse] (1934), Kapitoly, II.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Ojazyce básnickém’ [On poetic language] (1940), Kapitoly, I; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Polákova Vznešenost přfrody’ [Polák's Sublimity of Nature] (1934), Kapitoly, II.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Polákova Vznešenost přfrody’ [Polák's Sublimity of Nature] (1934), Kapitoly, II.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Strukturalismus v estetice a ve vědě o literatuře’ [Structuralism in aesthetics and in the science of literature] (1939/1940), Kapitoly, II; Eng. trans. Steiner, in (ed.), Prague School.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Význam estetiky’ [The significance of aesthetics] (1942), Studie z estetiky,; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, Estetická funkce, norma a hodnota jako sociálmífakty (1936), Studie z estetiky,; Eng. trans. Aesthetic Function, Norm and Value as Social Facts (Ann Arbor, MI, 1970).Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, Kapitoly z české poetiky [Chapters from Czech poetics], 3 vols. (Prague, 1948).Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, Máchuv Máj. Estetická studie [Maácha's May. An aesthetic study] (1928), Kapitoly, III.
Mukařovský, Jan, Studie z estetiky [Studies from aesthetics] (Prague, 1966).Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, Studie z poetiky [Studies from poetics] (Prague, 1982).Google Scholar
Odmark, John (ed.), Language, Literature and Meaning, I – Problems of Literary Theory (Amsterdam, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J.Die Wissenschaft von der Dichtung, published in Berlin in 1939.Google Scholar
Pomorska, Krystyna et al. (eds.), Language, Poetry and Poetics. The Generation of the 1890s: Jakobson, Trubeckoj, Majakovskij (Proceedings of the First Roman Jakobson Colloquium) (Berlin, 1987).Google Scholar
Pomorska, Krystyna, ‘Roman Jakobson and the new poetics’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson.
Pos, H.J. ‘Perspectives du structuralisme’, Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, VIII (1939).Google Scholar
Procházka, Miroslav, Příspěvek k problematice sémiologie literatury a umění [A Contribution to the semiology of literature and art] (Prague, 1969).Google Scholar
Prucha, Jan, Pragmalinguistics: East European Approaches (Amsterdam, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renský, Miroslav, ‘Roman Jakobson and the Prague school’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson.
Renský, Miroslav, ‘Roman Jakobson and the Prague school’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson.
Sangster, Rodney B., Roman Jakobson and Beyond: Language as a System of Signs (Berlin, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand, Cours de linguistique générale, (1916) ed. Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert; critical edition prepared by Mauro, Tullio (Paris, 1972). (Pagination identical with earlier editions from the same publisher.) Cours de linguistique générale (Critical edn), ed. Engler, Rudolf, 2 vols. (Wiesbaden, 1967–1974).Google Scholar
Schamschula, Walter, ‘Mukařovský (1891–1975)’, in Turk, Horst (ed.), Klassiker der Literaturtheorie (Munich, 1979).Google Scholar
Schmid, Herta, ‘Der Funktionsbegriff des tschechischen Strukturalismus in der Theorie und in der literaturwisseschaftlichen Analyse am Beispiel von Havel's Horský hotel’, in Steiner, , Črvenka, and Vroon, (eds.), Structure.
Schmid, Herta, ‘Die “semantische Geste” als Schlüsselbegriff des Proger literaturwissenschaft-lichen Strukturalismus’, in Ibsch, E. (ed.), Schwerpunkte der Literaturwissenschajt (Amsterdam, 1982).Google Scholar
Schmid, Herta, ‘Die “semantische Geste” als Schlüsselbegriff des Proger literaturwissenschaft-lichen Strukturalismus’, in Ibsch, E. (ed.), Schwerpunkte der Literaturwissenschajt (Amsterdam, 1982).Google Scholar
Schmid, Herta, ‘Zum Begriff der ästhetischen Konkretisation im tschechischen Strukturalismus’, Sprache im technischen Zeitalter, 36 (1970).Google Scholar
Schwarz, Ulrich, Rettende Kritik und antizipierte Utopie. Zur geschichtlichen Gehalt-ästhetischen Erfahrung in den Theorien von J an Mukařovský, Walter Benjamin und Theodor W. Adorno (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A., ‘Karl Bühler: a neglected figure in the history of semiotic inquiry’, in The Play of Musement (Bloomington, 1981).Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, 13 vols. (The Hague, 1963–1976).Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare, Analysis of the Literary Text (Bloomington, 1988).Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare, Semiotics and Literary Criticism (The Hague, 1973).Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude F., and Weaver, Warren, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (Urbana, 1949).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, O teoriiprozy [On the theory of prose], 2nd edn (Moscow, 1929).Google Scholar
Simons, Peter M., ‘The formalization of Husserl's theory of wholes and parts’, in Smith, (ed.), Parts.
Skalička, Vladimiír, ‘Kodaňský strukturalismus a “Pražská sǩola'” [Copenhagen Structuralism and the ‘Prague School'], Slovo a slovesnost, 10 (1947/1948).Google Scholar
Skalička, Vladimiír, ‘Kodaňský strukturalismus a “Pražská sǩola'” [Copenhagen Structuralism and the ‘Prague School'], Slovo a slovesnost, 10 (1947/1948).Google Scholar
Slawiński, Janusz, Literatur als System und Prozess (Munich, 1975).Google Scholar
Smith, BarryParts and Moments. Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. (Munich, 1982).Google Scholar
Smith, Barry, and Mulligan, Kevin, ‘Pieces of a theory’, in Smith, (ed.), Parts.
Smith, Barry (ed.), Structure and Gestalt: Philosophy and Literature in Austria-Hungary and Her Successor States (Amsterdam, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spillner, Bern, Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft. Stilforschung, Rhetorik, Textlinguistik (Stuttgart, 1974).Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward, ‘Roman Jakobson: teacher and scholar’, in A Tribute to Roman Jakob son, 1896–1982 (Berlin, 1983).Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward, ‘Structural poetics and linguistics’, in Sebeok, (ed.), Trends, XII.
Steiner, Peter ‘Theèses présentées au Premier Congrès des philologues slaves’, in Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, I (Prague, 1929); Eng. trans, in Steiner, (ed.), Prague School.Google Scholar
Steiner, PeterStructure, Sign and Function. Selected Essays by Jan Mukařovský (New Haven, 1978).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter, ‘The conceptual basis of Prague structuralism’, in Matejka, (ed.), Sound.
Steiner, Peter, Russian Formalism. A Metapoetics (Ithaca, 1984).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter, Studies Dedicated to the Memory of Felix Vodička (Amsterdam, 1982).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter, and Wendy Steiner, ‘The axes of poetic language’, in Odmark, (ed.), Language.
Steiner, Peter (ed.), The Prague School. Selected Writings, 1929–1946 (Austin, 1982).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter and Burbank, John (eds. and trans.), The Word and Verbal Art. Selected Essays by Jan Mukaíovský (New Haven, 1977).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter, Červenka, M. and Vroon, R. (eds.), The Structure of the Literary Process.CrossRef
Stempel, Wolf-Dieter, Gestalt, Ganzheit, Struktur. Aus Vor- und Frühgeschichte des Strukturalismus in Deutschland (Göttingen, 1978).Google Scholar
Striedter, Jurij, ‘Einleitung’ to Vodička, Felix, Die Struktur der literarischen Entwick-lung, ed. Boldt, Frank et al. (Munich, 1976).Google Scholar
Striedter, Jurij, Literary Structure, Evolution, and Value: Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism Reconsidered (Cambridge, MA, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peer, Willie, Stylistics and Psychology. Investigations in Foregroundingi (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Sus, Oleg, ‘On the genetic preconditions of Czech structuralist semiology and semantics. An essay on Czech and German thought’, Poetics, 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Sus, Oleg, ‘On the genetic preconditions of Czech structuralist semiology and semantics. An essay on Czech and German thought’, Poetics, 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Svejkovsý, F., ‘Theoretical poetics in the twentieth century’, in Sebeok, (ed.), Trends, XII.
Tobin, Yishai (ed.), The Prague School and its Legacy (Amsterdam, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toman, Jindřrich, ‘A marvellous chemical laboratory …. and its deeper meaning: notes on Roman Jakobson and the Czech avant-garde between the two wars’, in Pomorska, et al. (eds.), Language.
Toman, Jindřrich, ‘A marvellous chemical laboratory …. and its deeper meaning: notes on Roman Jakobson and the Czech avant-garde between the two wars’, in Pomorska, et al. (eds.), Language.
Tomashevsky, Boris, Teorija literatury. Po`tika [Theory of Literature. Poetics], 4th edn (Moscow, 1928).Google Scholar
Trnka, Bohumil, ‘Linguistics and the ideological structure of the period’, qtd. from Eng. trans, in Vachek, The Linguistic School of Prague (Bloomington, 1966).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef, ‘Karl Bühler und die Prager Linguistenschule’, in Eschbach, (ed.), Bühler-Studien, II.
Vachek, Josef, Dictionnaire de linguistique de I'Ecole de Prague (Utrecht, 1960).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef, The Linguistic School of Prague (Bloomington, 1966).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef (ed.), A Prague School Reader in Linguistics (Bloomington, 1964).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef and Dusšková, Libuše (eds.), Praguiana. Some Basic and Less Known Aspects of the Prague Linguistics (Amsterdam, 1983).Google Scholar
Veltruský, Jiří, ‘Jan Mukařfovský;'s structural poetics and aesthetics’, Poetics Today, 2 (1980/1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vodiˇka, Felix, ‘The integrity of the literary process: notes on the development of theoretical thought in J. Mukřfovský's work’, Poetics, 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, ‘Literární historic Její problémy a úkoly’ [Literary history. Its problems and tasks] (1942), Struktura; Eng. trans, (part) in Matejka, and Titunik, (eds.), Semiotics.Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, ‘Literární historic Její problémy a úkoly’ [Literary history. Its problems and tasks] (1942), Struktura,; Eng. trans, (part) in Matejka, and Titunik, (eds.), Semiotics.Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, ‘Problematika ohlasu Nerudova dila’ [Problems of the echo of Neruda's work] (1941), Struktura; Eng. trans, in Steiner, (ed.), Prague School.Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, ‘Problematika ohlasu Nerudova dila’ [Problems of the echo of Neruda's work] (1941), Struktura,; Eng. trans, in Steiner, (ed.), Prague School.Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, Počátky krásné prózy novocěeské [The beginnings of Czech artistic prose] (Prague, 1948).Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, Structura vývoje (Prague, 1969).Google Scholar
Volek, Emil, Metastructuralismo. Poética moderna, semiotica narrativa y filosojia de las ciencias sociales (Madrid, 1985).Google Scholar
Warning, Rainer, ‘Rezeptionsästhetik als literaturwissenschaftliche Pragamatik’, in Warning, Rainer (ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik: Theorie und Praxis (Munich, 1975).Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R., ‘The poetic function and the nature of language’, in Pomorska, Krystyna and Rudy, Stephen (eds.), Roman Jakobson. Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time (Minneapolis, 1985).Google Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘The theory of literary history’, in Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, VI (Prague, 1936).Google Scholar
Wellek, René, The Literary Theory and Aesthetics of the Prague School (Ann Arbor, MI, 1969), rpt. in Discriminations: Further Concepts of Criticism (New Haven, 1970).Google Scholar
Winner, Thomas G., ‘The creative personality as viewed by the Prague linguistic circle: theories and implications’, in Matejka, L. (ed.), American Contributions to the Seventh International Congress of Slavists, I - Linguistics and Poetics (The Hague, 1973).Google Scholar
Winner, Thomas ‘Jan Mukařfovský: the beginnings of structural and semiotic aesthetics’, in Matejka, (ed.), Sound.
Winner, Thomas ‘Jan Mukařfovský: the beginnings of structural and semiotic aesthetics’, in Matejka, (ed.), Sound.
Winner, Thomas ‘Roman Jakobson and avant-garde art’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson.
Žmegač, Viktor and Škreb, Zdenko (eds.), Zur Kritik literaturwissenschaftlicher Methodologie (Frankfurt-on-Main, 1973).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×