Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:42:31.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The impact of Shakespeare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Marshall Brown
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

The impact of Shakespeare on Romantic literary criticism may be measured in at least three ways. First, his place in the canon: starting in the later eighteenth century, a transformation in taste, led and articulated by critical writings, radically changed the value of Shakespeare. In the world of culture and learning, Shakespeare ceased to be primarily a source of pleasure and of interest almost exclusively in England; he became by the 1830s a universal genius known and admired, throughout the West, for his deep insight into the human condition. His newly exemplary pedagogical value made Shakespeare the basis for England's educational mission in India. Shakespeare's cultural destiny was thus linked to Britain's rise to world power in the decades from the Seven Years' War through the Napoleonic struggles; Britain's wars against France counterpointed and reinforced the challenge Shakespeare offered to the literary values of the French neoclassicism that dominated European thought for more than a century. Second, the place of Romantic critics in the canon of Shakespeare studies: German works by August Wilhelm Schlegel and English works by Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Hazlitt are landmarks that still serve as points of departure for fresh thinking nearly two centuries later. Third, Shakespeare was a crucial starting point for important Romantic writers as they made innovative contributions in poetry and fiction, as well as in literary criticism and theory: Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Friedrich Schlegel, John Keats, Herman Melville.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, M. H., The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition, New York: Norton, 1958.Google Scholar
Abrams, Meyer H., The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition, New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Arac, Jonathan, ‘Hamlet, Little Dorrit, and the history of character’, South Atlantic quarterly 87.2 (Spring 1988)Google Scholar
Arac, Jonathan, ‘The media of sublimity: Johnson and Lamb on King Lear’, Studies in Romanticism 26 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, NinaWoman and the demon, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan, Shakespeare and the English Romantic imagination, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan, Shakespearean constitutions: politics, theatre, criticism, 1730–1830, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bate, Walter Jackson, John Keats, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan (ed.), The Romantics on Shakespeare, London: Penguin Books, 1992.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, German Romantic literary theory, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, A. C., ‘Hegel's theory of tragedy’, in Oxford lectures on poetry, London: Macmillan, 1909Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas, On heroes, hero-worship and the heroical in history, Goldberg, Michael K. (ed.), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, or, biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions, Engell, James and Bate, Walter Jackson (eds.), 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Coleridge's criticism of Shakespeare, Foakes, R. A. (ed.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. V: Lectures 1808–1819 on literature, Foakes, R. A. (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987, 16 vols.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The note books of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), 3 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Crawford, John M., Romantic criticism of Shakespearian drama, Salzburg: Institut für Englische Sprache und Literatur, Universität Salzburg, 1978.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst RobertEuropean literature and the Latin Middle Ages, Trask, Willard R. (trans.), New York: Harper and Row, 1963, chapter 16, ‘The book as symbol’, esp.
Dirk, Delabastita and D'hulst, Lievan (eds.), European Shakespeares: translating Shakespeare in the Romantic age, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1993.Google Scholar
Donohue, Joseph W. Jr, Dramatic character in the English Romantic age, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo, Representative men, in Essays and lectures, New York: Viking Press, 1983Google Scholar
Freud, SigmundThe origins of psychoanalysis: letters to Wilhelm Fliess, drafts and notes, 1887-1902, Bonaparte, Marie, Freud, Anna and Kris, Ernst (eds.), Mosbacher, Eric and Strachey, James (trans.), Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furst, Lilian R., ‘Shakespeare and the formation of Romantic drama in Germany and France’, in Gillespie, Gerald (ed.), Romantic drama, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1994Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, ‘Shakespeare: a tribute’, in Essays on art and literature, Gearey, John (ed.), Nardroff, Ellen and Nardroff, Ernest H. (trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1986Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Wilhelm Meister's apprenticeship, Blackall, Eric A. (ed. and trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann WolfgangWilhelm Meister's apprenticeship, Blackall, Eric A. and Lange, Victor (trans.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Grazia, Margreta, Shakespeare verbatim: the reproduction of authenticity and the 1790 apparatus, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundolf, Friedrich, Shakespeare und der deutsche Geist, Berlin: Bondi, 1911.Google Scholar
Habicht, Werner, ‘Romanticism, antiromanticism, and the German Shakespeare tradition’, in Kishi, Tetsuo, Pringle, Roger, Wells, Stanley (eds.), Shakespeare and cultural traditions, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1994Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, ‘Shakespeare and Milton’, Characters of Shakespeare's plays, London: Oxford University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, ‘Shakespeare and Milton’, in Lectures on the English poets and the English comic writers, Hazlitt, William Carew (ed.), London: Bell, 1894.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare, Wimsatt, W. K. Jr (ed.), New York: Hill and Wang, 1960.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. John (ed.), De Quincey as critic, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973Google Scholar
Joyce, JamesA portrait of the artist as a young man, in Levin, Harry (ed.), The portable James Joyce, rev. edn, New York: Vintage, 1966
Keats, John, The letters of John Keats: 1814–1821, Rollins, Hyder Edward (ed.), vol. I, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Jean-Luc Nancy, , The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German Romanticism, Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cherel (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lamb, Charles, ‘On the tragedies of Shakespeare, with reference to their fitness for stage representation’, in Complete works and letters, New York: Random House, 1935Google Scholar
LeWinter, Oswald (ed.), Shakespeare in Europe, New York: Meridian Books, 1963.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, F. O., American Renaissance: art and expression in the age of Emerson and Whitman, Oxford University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Melville, Herman, ‘Hawthorne and his mosses’, in Moby-Dick, Hayford, Harrison and Parker, Hershel (eds.), New York: Norton, 1967.Google Scholar
Odell, George C. D., Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving, New York: Scribner's Sons, 1920.Google Scholar
Sauer, Thomas G., A. W. Schlegel's Shakespearean criticism in England, 1811–1846, Bonn: Bouvier, 1981.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, A course of lectures on dramatic art and literature, Morrison, Alexander James William (ed.), Black, John (trans.), London: Bohn, 1846.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘On Goethe's Meister’, in German aesthetic and literary criticism: the Romantic ironists and Goethe, Wheeler, Kathleen M. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Philosophical fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Gespräch über die Poesie, in Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, vol. II: Charakteristiken und Kritiken I (1796–1801), Eichner, Hans (ed.), Munich: Schöningh, 1967 (trans. Behler, Ernst and Struc, Roman, Dialogue on poetry and literary aphorisms, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Literary notebooks, Eichner, Hans (ed.), University of London/Athlone Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, S., Shakespeare's lives, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Simpson, David (ed.), The origins of modern critical thought: German aesthetic and literary criticism from Lessing to Hegel, Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Spanos, William V.Charles Olson and negative capability: A de-structive interpretation’, in Repetitions: the postmodern occasion in literature and culture, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1987Google Scholar
Stendhal, , Racine and Shakespeare, Daniels, Guy (trans.), New York: Crowell-Collier Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary, Reinventing Shakespeare: a cultural history from the Restoration to the present, New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989.Google Scholar
Van Tieghem, Paul, Le romantisme dans la littérature européenne, Paris: Michel, 1948.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, GauriMasks of conquest, New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘Romanticism re-examined’, in Romanticism reconsidered, Frye, Northrop (ed.), New York: Columbia University Press, 1963Google Scholar
Wellek, René, A history of modern criticism: 1750–1950, vols. I–III, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955, 8 vols.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Kathleen M. (ed.), German aesthetic and literary criticism: the Romantic ironists and Goethe, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, The prose works of William Wordsworth, Owen, W. J. B. and Smyser, Jane Worthington (eds.), 3 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×