Aarsleff, Hans, The study of language in England 1780–1860, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Aarsleff, Hans, ‘Wordsworth, language and Romanticism’, Essays in criticism 30 (1980), pp. 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrams, M. H., ‘Structure and style in the greater romantic lyric’, in From sensibility to romanticism: essays presented to Frederick A. Pottle, Hilles, F. W. and Bloom, Harold (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1965, pp. 527–60.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H., ‘Structure and style in the greater romantic lyric’, Natural supernaturalism: tradition and revolution in Romantic literature, New York: Norton, 1973.Google Scholar

Abrams, Meyer H., The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition, New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H., Natural supernaturalism: tradition and revolution in Romantic literature, New York: Norton, 1971.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H., The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition, New York: Norton, 1958.Google Scholar

Adams, Hazard, ‘Revisiting Reynolds's Discourses and Blake's annotations’, in Essick, Robert E. and Pearce, Donald (eds.), Blake in his time, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1978, pp. 128–44.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W., and Horkheimer, Max, Dialectic of Enlightenment, Cumming, John (trans.), London: Verso, 1997.Google Scholar

Albert, Georgia, ‘Understanding irony: three essays on Friedrich Schlegel’, MLN, 108 (1993), pp. 825–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcock, Mary, ‘A receipt for writing a novel’, in Hughes, Joanna (ed.), Poems, London: Dilly, 1799, pp. 89–93.Google Scholar

Alford, Steven, Irony and the logic of the Romantic imagination, New York: Lang, 1984.Google Scholar

Alison, Archibald, Essays on the nature and principles of taste, 1790, rpt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1968.Google Scholar

Allemann, Beda, Ironie und Dichtung, Pfüllingen: Neske, 1956.Google Scholar

Allemann, Beda, ‘Ironie als literarisches Prinzip’, in Ironie und Dichtung, Schaefer, Albert (ed.), Munich: Beck, 1970, pp. 11–37.Google Scholar

Allemann, Beda, Irony and the discourse of modernity, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Allemann, Beda, Ironie und literarische Moderne, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997.Google Scholar

Almeida, Hermione, Romantic medicine and John Keats, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Altick, Richard D., Paintings from books: art and literature in Britain, 1760–1900, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Amarasinghe, Upali, Dryden and Pope in the early nineteenth century, Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Amrine, Frederick, Zucker, Francis J. and Wheeler, Harvey (eds.), Goethe and the sciences: a reappraisal, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Wilda C., Between the library and the laboratory: the language of chemistry in eighteenth-century France, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Anon, ., ‘The living poets of England. Mrs Hemans’, The literary magnet 4 (March 1826), pp. 113–21.Google Scholar

Anon, ., ‘The poetry of Miss Landon’, The literary magnet n.s. 1 (January 1827).Google Scholar

Ansel, Michael, ‘Auf dem Weg zur Verwissenschaftlichung der Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: Heines Abhandlung Zur Geschichte der Religion und Philosophie in Deutschland und Die romantische Schule’, Internationales Archiv för Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur 17.2 (1992)Google Scholar

Arac, Jonathan, ‘The media of sublimity: Johnson and Lamb on King Lear’, Studies in Romanticism 26 (1987), pp. 209–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arac, Jonathan, ‘Hamlet, Little Dorrit, and the history of character’, South Atlantic quarterly 87.2 (Spring 1988), pp. 311–28.Google Scholar

Arac, Jonathan, Critical genealogies: historical situations for postmodern literary studies, New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Arden, Reed (ed.), Romanticism and language, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Nancy, Desire and domestic fiction: a political history of the novel, New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Isobel, ‘The gush of the feminine: how can we read women's poetry of the Romantic period?’ in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar

Arnim, Bettina, Die Günderode, in Schmitz, Walter and Steinsdorff, Sibylle (eds.), Werke und Briefe, 4 vols., Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1986, I: 295–746.Google Scholar

Arnim, Bettina, Goethes Briefwechsel mit einem Kinde, in Schmitz, Walter and Steinsdorff, Sibylle (eds.), Werke und Briefe, vol. II, Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1992, 4 vols. (trans. Goethe's correspondence with a child, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1868).Google Scholar

Arnold, Matthew, The poems of Wordsworth, London: Macmillan, 1879.Google Scholar

Ashfield, Andrew and Bolla, Peter (eds.), The sublime: a reader in eighteenthcentury British aesthetic theory, Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashton, Rosemary, The German idea: four English writers and the reception of German thought, 1800–1860, Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Aske, Martin, ‘Critical disfigurings; the “jealous leer malign” in Romantic criticism’, in Questioning Romanticism, Beer, John (ed.), Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar

Attridge, Derek, Peculiar language, London: Methuen, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ault, Donald, Visionary physics: Blake's response to Newton, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Austen, Jane, Jane Austen's letters to her sister Cassandra and others, Chapman, R. W. (ed.), London: Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Austen, Jane, Persuasion, Spacks, Patricia Ann Meyer (ed.), New York: Norton, 1995.Google Scholar

Austen, Jane, Northanger Abbey, Grogan, Claire (ed.), Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Baer, Marc, Theatre and disorder in late Georgian London, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bahti, Timothy, ‘Fate in the past: Peter Szondi's reading of German Romantic genre theory’, Boundary 2 11 (1983), pp. 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baillie, Joanna, ‘Preface’ to A series of plays, 1798, rpt. London: Routledge, 1996: 1–72.Google Scholar

Baillie, Joanna, ‘Introductory discourse’, A series of plays, 1798, rpt. London: Routledge, 1996, I: 1–72.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich, The dialogic imagination, Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael (trans.), Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Baldick, Chris, The social mission of English criticism, 1848–1932., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Balzac, Honoré, Preface to La comédie humaine, , Marcel Bouteron (ed.), vol. I, Paris: Gallimard, 1950–6, pp. 3–16 (trans. Marriage, Ellen, The works of Honoré de Balzac, vol. I, Philadelphia, PA: Avil, 1901, pp. liii–lxix).Google Scholar

Balzac, Honoré, ‘A study of M. Beyle’, in The charterhouse of Parma by Stendhal, , 2 vols., Moncrieff, C. K. Scott (trans.), New York: Boni & Liveright, 1925, 1: vii–lxxiii.Google Scholar

Banks, Brenda, ‘Rhetorical missiles and double-talk: Napoleon, Wordsworth, and the invasion scare of 1804’, in Romanticism, radicalism, and the press, Behrendt, Stephen C. (ed.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1997, pp. 103–19.Google Scholar

Barbauld, Anna Laetitia (ed.), ‘On the origin and progress of novel-writing’, in The British novelists, 50 vols., London: Rivington, 1810, 1: 1–62.Google Scholar

Barbauld, Anna Letitia (ed.), The British novelists, 50 vols., London: Rivington, 1810.Google Scholar

Barbauld, Anna Letitia, The works of Anna Lætitia Barbauld, with a memoir by Lucy Aikin, 2 vols., London: Longman, 1825.Google Scholar

Barbauld, Anna Letitia, The poems of Anna Letitia Barbauld, McCarthy, William and Kraft, Elizabeth (eds.), Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Barbauld, Anna Letitia, ‘On the pleasure derived from objects of terror, with Sir Bertrand, a fragment’, Gamer, Michael (ed.), http://www.english.upenn.edu/˜mgamer/Romantic/ barbauldessays.html.

Barbauld, Anna Letitia (ed.), Poetical works of Mr. William Collins, London: Cadell and Davies, 1802.Google Scholar

Barbauld, Anna Letitia (ed.), The correspondence of Samuel Richardson, London: Richard Phillips, 1804.Google Scholar

Barbauld, Anna Letitia (ed.), The British novelists, 50 vols., London: Rivington, 1810.Google Scholar

Barfield, Owen, Saving the appearances: a study in idolatry, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Barilli, Renato, Rhetoric, Menozzi, Giuliana (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Barrell, John, English literature in history, 1730–80: an equal, wide survey, London: Hutchinson, 1983.Google Scholar

Barrell, John, The political theory of painting from Reynolds to Hazlitt: ‘the body of the public’, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Barrell, John, The birth of Pandora and the division of knowledge, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.Google Scholar

Barry, Kevin, Language, music, and the sign: a study in aesthetics, poetics and poetic practice from Collins to Coleridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl, Protestant theology in the nineteenth century: its background & history, Valley Forge, PA: Judson Press, 1973. Translation based on 2nd rev. German edn, Zurich: Zollikon, 1952.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland, ‘The old rhetoric: an aide-memoire’, in The semiotic challenge, Howard, Richard (trans.), New York: Hill and Wang, 1988, pp. 11–94.Google Scholar

Barzun, Jacques, Classic, Romantic, and Modern, New York: Doubleday, 1961.Google Scholar

Bate, Walter J., From Classic to Romantic: premises of taste in eighteenth century England, New York: Harper, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bate, Walter J. (ed.), Criticism: the major texts, New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1970.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan (ed.), The Romantics on Shakespeare, London: Penguin Books, 1992.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan, Shakespeare and the English Romantic imagination, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan, Shakespearean constitutions: politics, theatre, criticism, 1730–1830, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bate, Walter Jackson, John Keats, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Bator, Paul G., ‘Rhetoric and the novel in the eighteenth-century British university curriculum’, Eighteenth-century studies 30 (1996–7), pp. 173–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baudelaire, Charles, Baudelaire as a literary critic: selected essays, Hyslop, Lois Boe and Hyslop, Francis E. Jr (trans.), University Park, pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Baudelaire, Charles, Oeuvres complètes, Pichois, Claude (ed.), 2 vols., Paris: Gallimard, 1976, vol. II.Google Scholar

Baudelaire, Charles, La Fanfarlo, Boyd, Greg (trans.), Lappin, Kendall E. (ed.), Berkeley: Donald S. Ellis, 1986.Google Scholar

Baudelaire, Charles, Oeuvres complètes, Dantec, Yves-Gérard (ed.), Paris: Gallimard, 1951.Google Scholar

Bauer, Matthias, Romantheorie, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumer, Konstanze, Bettina, Psyche, Mignon: Bettina von Arnim und Goethe, Stuttgart: Heinz, 1986.Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White, ‘German philosophy’, in The encyclopedia of philosophy, Edwards, Paul (ed.), 8 vols., New York: Macmillan, 1967, vol. III, pp. 291–309.Google Scholar

Becker, Eva D., Der deutsche Roman um 1780, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beebee, Thomas O., The ideology of genre: a comparative study of generic instability, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Beer, John B., Coleridge, the visionary, London: Chatto & Windus, 1959.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, ‘The origins of Romantic literary theory’, Colloquia Germanica 2 (1968), pp. 109–26.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, ‘The impact of Classical antiquity on the formation of the Romantic literary theory of the Schlegel brothers’, in Classical models in literature, Konstantinovic, Zoran, , Warren Anderson and Dietze, Walter (eds.), (Proceedings of the ixth Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association), Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck, 1981, pp. 139–43.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, ‘Problems of origin in literary history’, in Theoretical issues in literary history, Perkins, David (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, Studien zur Romantik und zur idealistischen Philosophie, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1988.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, Unendliche Perfektibilität: europäische Romantik und französische Revolution, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1989.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, Frühromantik, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behler, Ernst and Hörisch, Jochen, Die Aktualität der Frühromantik, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1987.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, ‘Die Auffassung der Revolution in der deutschen Frühromantik’, in Essays on European literature in honor of Liselotte Dieckmann, Hohendahl, Peter Uwe, Lindenberger, Herbert and Schwarz, Egon (eds.), St Louis, MO: Washington University Press, 1972, pp. 191–215.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, ‘Französische Revolution und Antikekult’, in Europäische Romantik i, Mandelkow, Karl Robert (ed.), Neues Handbuch der Literaturwissenschaft 14, Wiesbaden: Athenaion, 1982, pp. 83–112.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, Unendliche Perfektibilität: europäische Romantik und französische Revolution, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1989.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, Irony and the discourse of Modernity, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, German Romantic literary theory, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behler, Ernst, and Hörisch, Jochen, Die Aktualität der Frühromantik, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1989.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, Klassische Ironie, romantische Ironie, tragische Ironie: zum Ursprung dieser Begriffe, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1972.Google Scholar

Behler, Diana, The theory of the novel in early German Romanticism, Berne: Peter Lang, 1978.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, ‘Goethes Wilhelm Meister und die Romantheorie der Frühromantik’, Etudes germaniques 44 (1989), pp. 409–28.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, German Romantic literary theory, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behler, Ernst, Irony and the discourse of modernity, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, ‘Die Poesie in der frühromantischen Theorie der Brüder Schlegel’, in Behler, Ernst (ed.), Athenäum: Jahrbuch für Romantik (1991), pp. 13–40.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, ‘Problems of origin in modern literary history’, in Theoretical issues in literary history, Perkins, David (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst, ‘Concepts of literary history in the comparative literary history of the Schlegel brothers’, in Comparative literary history as discourse: in honor of Anna Balakian, Valdés, Mario J., Javitch, Daniel and Aldridge, A. Owen (eds.), Bern: Peter Lang, 1992, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar

Behrendt, Stephen C., ‘Questioning the Romantic novel’, Studies in the novel 26 (1994), pp. 5–25.Google Scholar

Behrendt, Stephen C., Shelley and his audiences, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Behrendt, Stephen, ‘Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the woman writer's fate’, in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 69–87.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C., The fate of reason: German philosophy from Kant to Fichte, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick (ed. and trans.), The early political writings of the German Romantics, Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C., Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: the genesis of modern German political thought, 1790–1820, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Michael Davitt, The development of American romance: the sacrifice of relation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Bender, John, and Wellbery, David E. (eds.), The ends of rhetoric: history - theory - practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter, Illuminations, Arendt, Hannah (ed.), Zohn, Harry (trans.), New York: Schocken, 1969.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter, The concept of criticism in German Romanticism, in Selected writings, vol. I: 1913–26, Bullock, Marcus Paul and Jennings, Michael W. (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1996, pp. 116–200.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter, Der Begriff der Kunstkritik in der deutschen Romantik, in Gesammelte Schriften, Tiedemann, Rolf and Schweppenhäuser, Hermann (eds.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974, vol. I, pp. 7–122.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter, ‘The storyteller: reflections on the work of Nikolai Leskov’, in Illuminations, Arendt, Hannah (ed.), Zohn, Harry (trans.), New York: Schocken, 1969, pp. 83–109.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter, ‘The storyteller: reflections on the work of Nikolai Leskov’, The origin of German tragic drama, Osborne, John (trans.), London: Verso, 1992.Google Scholar

Berghahn, Klaus L., ‘From Classicist to Classical literary criticism, 1730–1806’, Blazer, John R. (trans.), in Hohendahl, Peter Uwe (ed.), A history of German literary criticism, 1730–1980, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1988, pp. 13–98.Google Scholar

Berman, Antoine, The experience of the foreign: culture and translation in Romantic Germany, Heyvaert, S. (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bernhardi, August Ferdinand, Anfangsgründe der Sprachwissenschaft, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1990.Google Scholar

Bernhardi, August Ferdinand, Sprachlehre, 2 vols., 2nd edn, Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1973.Google Scholar

Besser, Gretchen R., Germaine de Staël revisited, New York: Twayne, 1994.Google Scholar

Bhéguin, Albert, L'ame romantique et le rêve: essai sur le romantisme allemand et la poésie française, Paris: Corti, 1946.Google Scholar

Bialostosky, Don H. and Needham, Lawrence D. (eds.), Rhetorical traditions and British Romantic literature, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Bialostosky, Don H., Wordsworth, dialogics, and the practice of criticism, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bietak, Wilhelm, Romantische Wissenschaft, Deutsche Literatur, ser. 17, vol. 13, Leipzig: Reclam, 1940.Google Scholar

Bishop, Lloyd, Romantic irony in French literature: from Diderot to Beckett, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Black, Max, Models and metaphors: studies in language and philosophy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Blackall, Eric A., Goethe and the novel, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Blair, Hugh, Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, 1783, rpt. Philadelphia: Troutman & Hayes, 1853.Google Scholar

Blair, Hugh, Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, London: W. Tegg, 1879.Google Scholar

Blair, Hugh, Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, vol. III, New York: Garland, 1970, 3 vols.Google Scholar

Blake, William, The poetry and prose of William Blake, Erdman, David V. (ed.), Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1970.Google Scholar

Blake, William, The complete poetry and prose of William Blake, rev. edn, Erdman, David V. and Bloom, Harold (eds.), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Blake, William, Poetry and prose, Keynes, Geoffrey (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1946.Google Scholar

Blake, William, The poetry and prose of William Blake, Erdman, David V. (ed.), Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1970.Google Scholar

Blanckenburg, Friedrich, Versuch über den Roman, Lämmert, Eberhard (ed.), Stuttgart: Metzler, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blin, Georges, Stendhal et les problèmes du roman, Paris: Corti, 1990.Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold, Kabbalah and criticism, New York: Seabury Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold, ‘The internalization of quest romance’, The Yale review 58 (1969), pp. 526–36.Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold, The visionary company: a reading of English Romantic poetry, rev. edn, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1961; 1971.Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold, Introduction, Mary Shelley, New York: Chelsea House, 1985, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold, et al. (eds.), Deconstruction and criticism, New York: Seabury, 1979.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, Hans, ‘Anthropologische Annäherung an die Aktualität der Rhetorik’, in Wirklichkeiten in denen wir leben, Stuttgart: Reclam, 1981, pp. 104–36.Google Scholar

Böckmann, Paul, ‘Der Roman der Transzendentalpoesie in der Romantik’, in Geschichte, Deutung, Kritik: Literaturwissenschaftliche Beiträge dargebracht zum 65. Geburtstag Werner Kohlschmidts, Bindschedler, Maria and Zinsli, Paul (eds.), Bern: Francke, 1969, pp. 165–85.Google Scholar

Bohler, Michael, ‘Naturwissenschaft und Dichtung bei Goethe’, in Wittkowski, Wolfgang (ed.), Goethe im Kontext: Kunst und Humanität, Naturwissenschaft und Politik von der Aufklärung bis zur Restauration, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1984, pp. 313–35.Google Scholar

Bohls, Elizabeth, Women travel writers and the language of aesthetics, 1716–1818, Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhme, Jakob, Sämmtliche Werke, Schiebler, K. W. (ed.), 7 vols., Leipzig: Barth, 1922.Google Scholar

Bolla, Peter, The discourse of the sublime: readings in history, aesthetics and the subject, Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Bonfiglio, Thomas P., ‘Electric affinities: Arnim and Schellings Naturphilosophie’, Euphorion 81 (1987), pp. 217–39.Google Scholar

Bono, James J., ‘Science, discourse, and literature: the role/rule of metaphor in science’, in Literature and science: theory and practice, Peterfreund, Stuart (ed.), Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, 1990, pp. 59–89.Google Scholar

Booth, Wayne, A rhetoric of irony, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Bosse, Heinrich, ‘The marvellous and Romantic semiotics’, Studies in Romanticism 14 (1975), pp. 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosse, Heinrich, ‘“Dichter kann man nicht bilden”: zur Veränderung der Schulrhetorik nach 1770’, Jahrbuch für internationale Germanistik 2 (1976), pp. 81–125.Google Scholar

Boulger, James D., Coleridge as religious thinker, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Bourgeois, René, L'ironie romantique: spectacle et jeu de Mme de Staël à Gérard de Nerval, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 1974.Google Scholar

Bovenschen, Silvia, Die imaginierte Weiblichkeit: exemplarische Untersuchungen zu kulturgeschichtlichen und literarischen Präsentationsformen des Weiblichen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1979.Google Scholar

Bowie, Andrew, Aesthetics and subjectivity: from Kant to Nietzsche, Manchester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bradley, A. C., ‘Hegel's theory of tragedy’, in Oxford lectures on poetry, London: Macmillan, 1909, pp. 69–95.Google Scholar

Braider, Christopher, Refiguring the real: picture and modernity in word and image, 1400–1700, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Brantner, Christina E., ‘Frühromantische Frauengestalten in Dorothea Veits Roman Florentin (1801)’, Michigan Germanic studies 17 (1991), pp. 51–70.Google Scholar

Brewer, Daniel, ‘Political culture and literary history: La Harpe's Lycée’, Modern language quarterly 58 (1997), pp. 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bromwich, David, Hazlitt: the mind of a critic, Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Bromwich, David, ‘Romantic poetry and the Edinburgh ordinances’, Yearbook of English studies 19 (1989), 1–16.Google Scholar

Brooks, Peter, The melodramatic imagination: Balzac, Henry James, melodrama, and the mode of excess, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Brooks, Cleanth, ‘Irony as a principle of structure’, in Critical theory since Plato, Adams, Hazard (ed.), New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971, pp. 968–74.Google Scholar

Brown, Huntington, The Classical tradition in English literature: a bibliography, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935.Google Scholar

Brown, Marshall, The shape of German romanticism, Ithaca, NY: Crnell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Brown, Marshall, ‘Romanticism and enlightenment’, in The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Curran, Stuart (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Marshall, The shape of German Romanticism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Brown, Jane K. ‘The theatrical mission of the Lehrjahre’, Goethe's narrative fiction: the Irvine Goethe symposium, Lillyman, William J. (ed.), Berlin: de Gruyter, 1983, pp. 69–84.Google Scholar

Brown, Marshall, ‘The logic of realism: a Hegelian approach’, PMLA 96 (1981), pp. 224–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Chandos Michael, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft, or, the female illuminati: the campaign against women and “modern philosophy” in the early republic’, Journal of the early republic 15 (1995), pp. 389–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Nathaniel, Sexuality and feminism in Shelley, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Barry S., ‘Sturm und Drang and the Romantic period in music’, Studies in Romanticism 9 (1970), pp. 269–84.Google Scholar

Brown, Marshall, Turning points: essays in the history of cultural expressions, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Bruns, Gerald L., Modern poetry and the idea of language, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Bruns, , ‘Wordsworth at the limits of romantic hermeneutics’, The centennial review 33 (1989), pp. 393–418.Google Scholar

Bryson, Norman, Word and image: French painting of the Ancien Régime, Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Bubner, RÜdiger (ed.), Das älteste Systemprogramm: Studien zur FrÜhgeschichte des deutschen Idealismus (Hegel-Studien, suppl. no. 9), Bonn: Bouvier, 1973.Google Scholar

Bull, Malcolm (ed.), Apocalypse theory and the ends of the world, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund, A philosophical inquiry into the origins of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful, Boulton, James T. (ed.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France, O'Brien, Conor Cruise (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976.Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth, The rhetoric of religion: a study in logology, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Burney, Fanny, Diary and letters of Madame d'Arblay, Barrett, Charlotte (ed.), 7 vols., London: Henry Colburn.

Burroughs, Catherine B., Closet stages: Joanna Baillie and the theater theory of British Romantic women writers, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burwick, Frederick, ‘Elektrizität und Optik: zu den Beziehungen zwischen wissenschaftlichen und literarischen Schriften Achim von Arnims’, Aurora 46 (1986), pp. 19–47.Google Scholar

Burwick, Frederick, The damnation of Newton: Goethe's color theory and Romantic perception, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burwick, Frederick (ed.), Approaches to organic form: permutations in science and culture, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, Douglas, ‘Wordsworth and the classics’, University of Toronto quarterly 2 (1933), pp. 359–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, Douglas, Mythology and the Romantic tradition in English poetry, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937.Google Scholar

Bush, Douglas, Science and English poetry: a historical sketch, 1590–1950, New York: Oxford University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Butler, E. M., The tyranny of Greece over Germany: a study of the influence exercised by Greek art and poetry over the great German writers of the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Cambridge University Press, 1935.Google Scholar

Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, rebels, and reactionaries: English literature and its background, 1760–1830., New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Butler, Marilyn (ed.), Burke, Paine, Godwin, and the Revolution controversy, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Butler, Marilyn, Jane Austen and the war of ideas, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. Romantics, rebels, and reactionaries: English literature and its background 1760–1830, Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, rebels, and reactionaries: English literature and its background, 1760–1830, New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Butler, Marilyn, ‘Culture's medium: the role of the review’, in Curran, Stuart (ed.), The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 120–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bygrave, Stephen, ‘Land of the giants: gaps, limits and audiences in Coleridge's Biographia literaria’, in Beyond Romanticism: new approaches to texts and contexts, 1780–1832, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 32–52.Google Scholar

Byron, George Gordon Lord, Poetical works, McGann, Jerome J. (ed.), 7 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980–93.Google Scholar

Byron, George Gordon Lord, The complete works, McGann, Jerome J. (ed.), 7 vols., Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Cambridge history of the Bible, vol. III: The West, from the Reformation to the present day, Greenslade, S. L. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1963, 3 vols.Google Scholar

Campbell, Thomas, Specimens of the British poets: with biographical and critical notices, and an essay on English poetry, 7 vols., London: John Murray, 1819.Google Scholar

Campbell, Thomas, ‘An essay on English poetry’, in Specimens of the British poets: with biographical and critical notices, and an essay on English poetry, London: John Murray, 1819.Google Scholar

Campe, Rüdiger, Affekt und Ausdruck: zur Umwandlung der literarischen Rede im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campe, Rüdiger, ‘Die zwei Perioden des Stils’, Comparatio 2 (1991), pp. 73–99.Google Scholar

Cantor, Paul A., Creature and creator: myth-making and English Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Carlson, Julie A., In the theatre of Romanticism: Coleridge, nationalism, women, Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, Julie A., ‘Forever young: Master Betty and the queer stage of youth in English Romanticism’, in Pfau, Thomas and Kercsmar, Rhonda Ray (eds.), Rhetorical and cultural dissolution in Romanticism, Special Issue, South Atlantic quarterly 95 (1996), pp. 575–602.Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas, On heroes, hero-worship and the heroical in history, Goldberg, Michael K. (ed.), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas, Critical and miscellaneous essays, Traill, Henry DuC (ed.), London: Chapman & Hall, 1899.Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas, On heroes, hero-worship and the heroic in history, New York: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas, Critical and miscellaneous essays, Traill, H. D. (ed.), 5 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Carus, Carl Gustav, Psyche: zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Seele, Pforzheim: Flammer und Hoffmann, 1846.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst, The philosophy of the Enlightenment, Koelln, Fritz C. A. and Pettegrove, James P., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Castex, Pierre-Georges, Baudelaire critique d'art, Paris: Sedes, 1969.Google Scholar

Caygill, Howard, Art of judgement, Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Caygill, Howard, A Kant dictionary, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Robert, History of the English language and literature, 4th edn, Edinburgh: Chambers 1837.Google Scholar

Chandler, James K., Wordsworth's second nature: a study of the poetry and politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Chandler, James K., ‘Representative men, spirits of the age, and other Romantic types’, in Johnston, Kenneth R. et al. (eds.), Romantic revolutions: criticism and theory, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990, pp. 104–32.Google Scholar

Chapple, Gerald, Hall, Frederick and Schulte, Hans (eds.), The Romantic tradition: German literature and music in the nineteenth century, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1992.Google Scholar

Charity, A. C., Events and their afterlife: the dialectics of Christian typology in the Bible and Dante, Cambridge University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Chase, Cynthia, Decomposing figures: rhetorical readings in the Romantic tradition, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Chateaubriand, François-René, Génie du christianisme, ou, beautés de la religion chrétienne, Paris: Migneret, 1802 (trans. Shoberl, Frederic, The beauties of Christianity, Philadelphia, pa: Carey, 1815).Google Scholar

Chateaubriand, François-René, Le Génie du christianisme, ou, beautés de la religion chrétienne, Paris: Migneret, 1802 (trans. Shoberl, Frederic, The beauties of Christianity, Philadelphia, PA: Carey, 1815).Google Scholar

Chateaubriand, François-René, The genius of Christianity: or, the spirit and beauty of the Christian religion, White, Charles I. (trans.), New York: Fertig, 1976.Google Scholar

Christensen, Jerome, Coleridge's blessed machine of language, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Christensen, Jerome, Practicing enlightenment: Hume and the formation of a literary career, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Christensen, Jerome, Lord Byron's strength: Romantic writing and commercial society, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Clark, Kenneth, The gothic revival: an essay in the history of taste, 3rd edn, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1962.Google Scholar

Cohen, Ted, and Guyer, Paul (eds.), Essays in Kant's aesthetics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Cohen, Paula M., ‘Jane Austen's rejection of Rousseau: a novelistic and feminist initiation’, Papers on language and literature 30 (1994), pp. 215–34.Google Scholar

Cole, Lucinda, ‘(Anti)feminist sympathies: the politics of relationship in Smith, Wollstonecraft, and More’, ELH 58 (1991), pp. 107–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, Watson, George (ed.), New York: Everyman, 1971.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, ‘On the principles of genial criticism’, in Biographia literaria, edited with his aesthetical essays, Shawcross, John (ed.), 2 vols., OxfordUniversity Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Lay sermons, White, Reginald James (ed.), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, or, biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions, Engell, James and Bate, Walter Jackson (eds.), 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, or, biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions, Engell, James and Bate, Walter Jackson (eds.), 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar

ColeridgeTaylor, Samuel, The notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Collected letters of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Griggs, E. L. (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1956–71.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. V: Lectures 1808–19 on literature, Foakes, R. H. (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987, 16 vols.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Poetical works, Coleridge, E. H. (ed.), 2 vols., Oxford University Press, 1912.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), 5 vols., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957–.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), 16 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, On the constitution of the church and state according to the idea of each, Barrell, John (ed.), London: Dent & Sons, 1972.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, ‘Confessions of an inquiring spirit’, in Collected works, vol. 1XI: Shorter works and fragments, Jackson, J. R. J. and Jackson, H. T. (eds.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 1111–71.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, Shawcross, J. (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1907.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The note books of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), 3 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, or, biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions, Engell, James and Bate, Walter Jackson (eds.), 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. V: Lectures 1808–1819 on literature, Foakes, R. A. (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987, 16 vols.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Coleridge's criticism of Shakespeare, Foakes, R. A. (ed.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel T., ‘The mysteries of Udolpho, by Radcliffe, Ann’, The critical review 24 (August 1794), pp. 361–72.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel T., ‘The Italian, by Radcliffe, Ann’, The critical review 28 (June 1798), pp. 166–9.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel T., ‘Hubert de Sevrac, by Robinson, Mary’, The critical review 28 (August 1798).Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel T., The complete poetical works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coleridge, Ernest Harley (ed.), 2 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1912.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel T., The notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), 3 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel T., The friend, Rooke, Barbara E. (ed.), 2 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel T., Table-talk, Woodring, Carl (ed.), 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel T., Http://www.english.upenn.edu/˜mgamer/Romantic/coleridge.reviews, Gamer, Michael (ed.).

Coleridge, Samuel T., Letters from England 1813–1844, Colvin, Christina (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Comstock, Cathy, ‘“Transcendental buffoonery”: irony as process in Schlegel's “Über die Unverständlichkeit”’, Studies in Romanticism, 26 (1987), pp. 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corngold, Stanley, ‘Nietzsche's moods’, Studies in Romanticism 29 (1990), pp. 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, Robert, Devolving English literature, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Crawford, John M., Romantic criticism of Shakespearian drama, Salzburg: Institut für Englische Sprache und Literatur, Universität Salzburg, 1978.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas (eds.), Romanticism and the sciences, Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Curran, Stuart (ed.), The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curran, T. H., ‘Schleiermacher: true interpreter’, in The interpretation of belief: Coleridge, Schleiermacher and Romanticism, Jasper, David (ed.), London: Macmillan, 19861986, pp. 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curran, Stuart, Poetic form and British Romanticism, Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Curran, Stuart ‘Romantic poetry: the I altered’, in Mellor, (ed.), Romanticism and feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988, pp. 185–207.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, Carl, Esthetics of music, Austin, William W. (trans.), Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Damrosch, Leopold Jr, ‘God and man’, in Symbol and truth in Blake's myth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980, pp. 244–301.Google Scholar

Dane, Joseph, The critical mythology of irony, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Darwin, Erasmus, The loves of the plants, 1789, facsim., Oxford: Woodstock, 1991.Google Scholar

Daverio, John, ‘Schumann's systems of musical fragments and Witz’, in Nineteenth-century music and the German Romantic ideology, New York: Schirmer Books, 1993, pp. 49–88.Google Scholar

Daverio, John, ‘Schumann's systems of musical fragments and Witz’, in Nineteenth-century music and the German Romantic ideology, New York: Schirmer Books, 1993, pp. 49–88.Google Scholar

Davidson, Cathy N., The revolution of the word: the rise of the novel in America, Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dawson, P. M. S., ‘Poetry in an age of revolution’, in The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Curran, Stuart (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993pp. 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Paz, Alfredo, Europa romantica: fondamenti e paradigmi della sensibilità moderna, Naples: Liguori, 1994.Google Scholar

De Quincey, Thomas, The collected writings of Thomas de Quincey, new edn, Masson, David (ed.), 14 vols., Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black, 1889–90.Google Scholar

De Quincey, Thomas, The collected writings of Thomas De Quincey, new edn, Masson, David (ed.), 14 vols., Edinburgh: Black, 1889–90.Google Scholar

Deane, Seamus, The French Revolution and Enlightenment in England, 1789–1832, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeJean, Joan, ‘Portrait of the artist as Sappho’, in Gutwirth, Goldberger and Szmurlo, (eds.), Germaine de Staël, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1991, pp. 122–37.Google Scholar

Delacroix, Eugène, The journal of Eugène Delacroix, Pach, Walter (trans.), New York: Crown, 1948.Google Scholar

Delacroix, Eugène, Journal de Eugène Delacroix, Joubin, André (ed.), 2 vols., Paris: Plon, 1932 (trans. Pach, Walter, The journal of Eugène Delacroix, New York: Crown, 1948).Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, Of grammatology, Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (trans.), Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Dewey, John, ‘James Marsh and American philosophy’, Journal of the history of ideas, 2 (1941), pp. 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

d'Hondt, Jacques, ‘Lumières et romantisme: le choc de la révolution’, Bulletin de la société américaine de philosophie de langue française 2 (1990–91)pp. 115–26.Google Scholar

Dierkes, Hans, Literaturgeschichte als Kritik: Untersuchungen zu Theorie und Praxis von Friedrich Schlegels frühromantischer Geschichtsschreibung, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1980.Google Scholar

Dierkes, Hans, ‘Ironie und System: Friedrich Schlegels “Philosophische Lehrjahre” (1797–1799)’, Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 97 (1990)pp. 251–76.Google Scholar

Dierkes, Hans, Literaturgeschichte als Kritik: Untersuchungen zu Theorie und Praxis von Friedrich Schlegels fröhromantischer Literaturgeschichtsschreibung, Studien zur deutschen Literatur 63, Töbingen: Niemeyer, 1980.Google Scholar

Dirk, Delabastita and D'hulst, Lievan (eds.), European Shakespeares: translating Shakespeare in the Romantic age, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1993.Google Scholar

D'Israeli, Isaac, Curiosities of literature: consisting of anecdotes, characters, sketches and observations, literary, critical and historical, London: Murray, 1791.Google Scholar

Dockhorn, Klaus, Macht und Wirkung der Rhetorik, Bad Homburg, Berlin and Zurich: Gehlen, 1968.Google Scholar

Donohue, Joseph W. Jr, Dramatic character in the English Romantic age, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Du Bos, Jean-Baptiste, Critical reflections on poetry, painting, and music, New York: AMS Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Dunlop, John Colin, History of prose fiction, Wilson, Henry (ed.), new edn, New York: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Dunlop, John Colin, History of prose fiction: a new edition revised with notes, appendices and index, Wilson, Henry (ed.), new edn, 2 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Dupuis, C. F., Origines de tous les cultes, ou religion universelle, 12 vols., Paris: 1791.Google Scholar

Dyson, A. E., The crazy fabric: essays in irony, London: Macmillan, 1965.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry, The function of criticism, London: Verso, 1984.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry, The ideology of the aesthetic, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry, The ideology of the aesthetic, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

Eaves, Morris, William Blake's theory of art, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Eaves, Morris, The counter-arts conspiracy: art and industry in the age of Blake, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Eaves, Morris, ‘The sister arts in British Romanticism’, in The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Curran, Stuart (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 236–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edgeworth, Maria, Letters for literary ladies, London: Johnson, 1795.Google Scholar

Eichendorff, Joseph, Der deutsche Roman des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts in seinem Verhältniß zum Christentum, in Sämtliche Werke des Freiherrn Joseph von Eichendorff, Historisch-Kritische Ausgabe, Mauser, Wolfram (ed.), 18 vols., Regensburg: Josef Habbel, 1965, VIII: 5–245.Google Scholar

Eichner, Hans, ‘The rise of modern science and the genesis of Romanticism,’ PMLA 97 (1982), pp. 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eitner, Lorenz (ed.), Neoclassicism and Romanticism, 1750–1850: sources and documents, 2 vols., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar

Elistratova, A. and Rona, E., ‘Romantic writers and the Classical literary heritage’, in European Romanticism, Soter, I., Neupokoyeva, I. and Rona, E. (eds.), Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1977, pp. 91–126.Google Scholar

Ellenberger, Henri F., The discovery of the unconscious: the history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry, New York: Basic Books, 1970.Google Scholar

Ellison, Julie, Delicate subjects: Romanticism, gender, and the ethics of understanding, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph Waldo, Representative men, in Essays and lectures, New York: Viking Press, 1983, pp. 611–761.Google Scholar

Emmersleben, August, Die Antike in der romantischen Theorie: die Gebrüder Schlegel und die Antike, Berlin: Ebering, 1937.Google Scholar

Engell, James, Forming the critical mind: Dryden to Coleridge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Engell, James, The creative imagination: Enlightenment to Romanticism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engelsing, Rolf, Analphabetentum und Lektüre: zur Sozialgeschichte des Lesens in Deutschland zwischen feudaler und industrieller Gesellschaft, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1973.Google Scholar

Erdman, David V., Blake, prophet against empire: a poet's interpretation of the history of his own times, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Erskine-Hill, Howard, The Augustan idea in English literature, London: Arnold, 1983.Google Scholar

Erskine-Hill, Howard, Poetry of opposition and revolution: Dryden to Wordsworth, Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubanks, Kevin, ‘Minerva's veil: Hemans, critics, and the construction of gender’, European Romantic review 8 (1997), pp. 341–59.Google Scholar

Favret, Mary A., ‘Telling tales about genre: poetry in the Romantic novel’, Studies in the novel 26 (1994), pp. 153–72.Google Scholar

Favret, Mary A., ‘A woman writes the fiction of science: the body in Frankenstein’, Genders 14 (1992), pp. 50–65.Google Scholar

Favret, Mary A., Romantic correspondence: women, politics, and the fiction of letters, Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Feldman, Paula R. and Kelley, Theresa M. (eds.), Romantic women writers: voices and countervoices, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Moira, Subject to others: British women writers and colonial slavery, 1670–1834, New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Moira, ‘Janet Little and Robert Burns: the politics of the heart’, in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 207–22.Google Scholar

Fermon, Nicole, Domesticating passions: Rousseau, woman, and the nation, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1997.Google Scholar

Ferris, Ina, The achievement of literary authority: gender, history, and the Waverley novels, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Fetzer, John Francis, ‘Romantic irony’, in European Romanticism: literary cross-currents, modes, and models, Hoffmeister, Gerhart (ed.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1990, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, Ludwig, The essence of Christianity, Eliot, George (trans.), New York: Harper, 1957.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Addresses to the German nation, Kelly, George Armstrong (ed.), New York & Evanston, IL: Harper & Row, 1968.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, ‘Von der Sprachfähigkeit und dem Ursprung der Sprache’, in Gesamtausgabe I, vol. III: Werke 1794–1796, Lauth, Reinhard and Jacob, Hans (eds.), Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann, 1966, pp. 97–127 (trans. Surber, Jere Paul, Language and German idealism: Fichte's linguistic philosophy, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, The characteristics of the present age, in Smith, William (trans.), Popular works of Johann Gottlieb Fichte, London: Trübner, 1889, II: 1–288.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Fichte: early philosophical writings, Breazeale, Daniel (ed. and trans.), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Fielding, Joseph, Joseph Andrews, Battestin, Martin C. (ed.), The Wesleyan edition of the works of Henry Fielding, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Fielding, Joseph, The history of Tom Jones, Bowers, Fredson (ed.), Oxford: Wesleyan University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Fiesel, Eva, Die Sprachphilosophie der deutschen Romantik, Tübingen: Mohr, 1927; rpt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1973.Google Scholar

Fink, Gonthier-Louis, ‘Die Revolution als Herausforderung in Literatur und Publizistik’, in Zwischen Revolution und Restauration: Klassik, Romantik 1786–1815, Deutsche Literatur: eine Sozialgeschichte 5, Glaser, Horst Albert (ed.), Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1980, pp. 110–29.Google Scholar

Fink, Gonthier-Louis (ed.), Les romantiques allemands et la révolution française, Strasbourg: Université des sciences humaines de Strasbourg, 1989.Google Scholar

Fink, Karl J., Goethe's history of science, Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Finlay, Marike, The Romantic irony of semiotics: Friedrich Schlegel and the crisis of representation, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishelov, David, Metaphors of genre: the role of analogies in genre theory, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Flagg, John S., ‘Shelley and Aristotle: elements of the Poetics in Shelley's theory of poetry’, Studies in Romanticism 9 (1970), pp. 44–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flaherty, Gloria, Opera in the development of German critical thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Flitter, Derek, Spanish Romantic literary theory and criticism, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Flitter, Derek, Spanish Romantic literary theory and criticism, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Foerster, Donald M., Homer in English criticism: the historical approach in the eighteenth century, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Women critics, 1660–1820: an anthology, Folger, Collective on Early Women Critics (ed.), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Fontanier, Pierre, Les figures du discours, Paris: Flammarion, 1968.Google Scholar

Formigari, Lia, Signs, science and politics: philosophies of language in Europe 1700–1830, Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fort, Bernadette (ed.), Fictions of the French Revolution, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Foscolo, Ugo, Ugo Foscolo's ‘Ultime lettere di Jacopo Ortis’: a translation, RadcliC-Umstead, Douglas (trans.), Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Foster, Gretchen M. (ed.), Pope versus Dryden: a controversy in letters to the Gentleman's magazine 1789–91, Victoria, BC: English Literary Studies, 1989.Google Scholar

Fowler, Alastair, Kinds of literature: an introduction to the theory of genres and modes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Fraiman, Susan, ‘Jane Austen and Edward Said: gender, culture, and imperialism’, Critical inquiry 21 (1995), pp. 805–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, Manfred, ‘Philosophische Grundlagen der Frühromantik’, Athenäum 4 (1994), pp. 37–130.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred, ‘Philosophische Grundlagen der Frühromantik’, Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik: Vorlesungen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred, Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred, ‘The infinite text’, Glyph: textual studies, vol. VII, Weber, Samuel (ed.), Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980, pp. 70–101.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred, Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik: Vorlesungen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar

Franklin, Caroline, ‘“At once above – beneath her sex”: the heroine in Regency verse romance’, Modern language review 84 (1989), pp. 273–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Caroline, ‘“Quiet cruising o'er the ocean woman”: Byron's Don Juan and the woman question’, Studies in Romanticism 29 (1990), pp. 603–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederiksen, Elke P. and Goodman, Katherine R. (eds.), Bettina Brentano von Arnim: gender and politics, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Fredricks, Nancy, ‘On the sublime and beautiful in Shelley's Frankenstein’, Essays in literature 23 (1996), pp. 178–89.Google Scholar

Frei, Hans W., The eclipse of Biblical narrative: a study in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century hermeneutics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund, The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Strachey, James (trans.), London: The Hogarth Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Fried, Michael, Absorption and theatricality: painting and beholder in the age of Diderot, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Friedrichsmeyer, Sara, ‘Caroline Schlegel-Schelling: “a good woman, and no heroine”’, in Goodman, Katherine R. and Waldstein, Edith (eds.), In the shadow of Olympus: German women writers around 1800, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Friedrichsmeyer, Sara, The androgyne in German Romanticism: Friedrich Schlegel, Novalis and the metaphysics of love, New York: Lang, 1983.Google Scholar

Friedrichsmeyer, Sara, ‘Caroline Schlegel-Schelling: “a good woman and no heroine”’, in Goodman, and Waldstein, (eds.), In the shadow of Olympus, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992, pp. 115–36.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop, A study of English Romanticism, Brighton: Harvester Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop, Fearful symmetry: a study of William Blake, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop, The great code: the Bible and literature, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop, ‘Poetry and design in William Blake’, in Blake: a collection of critical essays, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966, pp. 119–26.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop, The stubborn structure: essays on criticism and society, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Furet, François, Interpreting the French Revolution, Forster, Elborg (trans.), Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona (eds.), A critical dictionary of the French Revolution, Goldhammer, Arthur (trans.), Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Furniss, Tom, Edmund Burke's aesthetic ideology: language, gender, and political economy in revolution, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furniss, Tom, ‘Nasty tricks and tropes: sexuality and language in Mary Wollstonecraft's Rights of woman’, Studies in Romanticism 32 (1993), pp. 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furst, Lilian R., Romanticism in perspective: a comparative study of the aspects of the Romantic movements in England, France and Germany, London: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar

Furst, Lilian R., Fictions of romantic irony, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Furst, Lilian R., ‘Shakespeare and the formation of Romantic drama in Germany and France’, in Gillespie, Gerald (ed.), Romantic drama, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1994, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar

Furst, Lilian, The contours of European Romanticism, London: Macmillan, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and method, New York: Seabury Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans Georg, Truth and method, Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G. (trans.), 2nd edn, New York: Crossroad, 1988.Google Scholar

Galperin, William H., The return of the visible in British Romanticism, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Garber, Frederick, ‘Nature and the Romantic mind: egotism, empathy, irony’, Comparative literature 29 (1977), pp. 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber, Frederick (ed.), Romantic irony, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber, Frederick, Self, text, and romantic irony: the example of Byron, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber, Frederick (ed.), Romantic irony, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasché, Rodolphe, ‘Überlegungen zum Begriff der Hypotypose bei Kant’, in Hart Nibbrig, Christiaan L. (ed.), Was heißt ‘Darstellen’?Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994, pp. 152–74.Google Scholar

Geißler, Rolf (ed.), Romantheorie in der Aufklärung: Thesen und Texte zum Roman des 18. Jahrhunderts in Frankreich, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard, The architext: an introduction, Lewin, Jane E. (ed.), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Genlis, Stéphanie-Félicité Comtesse, ‘Le femme auteur’, Nouveaux contes moraux et nouvelles historiques, 3 vols., Paris: Maradin, 1802, III: 51–150.Google Scholar

Genlis, Stéphanie-Félicité Comtesse, De l'influence des femmes sur la littérature française, Paris: Lecointe et Durey, 1826.Google Scholar

Gervinus, Georg Gottfried, Geschichte der poetischen National-Literatur der Deutschen, 5 vols., Leipzig: Engelmann, 1835–42.Google Scholar

Gervinus, Georg Gottfried, ‘Prinzipien einer deutschen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung’, in Literaturwissenschaft und Literaturgeschichte: ein Lesebuch zur Fachgeschichte der Germanistik, Cramer, Thomas and Wenzel, Horst (eds.), Munich: Fink, 1975, pp. 19–64.Google Scholar

Gibbon, Edward, An essay on the study of literature, New York: Garland, 1970.Google Scholar

Gibbon, Edward, The decline and fall of the Roman Empire, Womersley, David (ed.), London: Penguin Books, 1995.Google Scholar

Gide, André, Introduction, in Hogg, James, The private memoirs and confessions of a justified sinner, London: Cresset, 1947, pp. ix–xv.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Gerald (ed.), Romantic drama, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1994.Google Scholar

Gillispie, Charles Coulston, Genesis and geology: a study in the relations of scientific thought, natural theology, and social opinion in Great Britain, 1790–1850, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Gilmartin, Kevin, Print politics: the press and radical opposition in early nineteenthcentury England, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Gipper, Helmut, ‘Sprachphilosophie in der Romantik’, in Sprachphilosophie: ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössicher Forschung, Dascal, Marcelo et al. (eds.), Berlin: de Gruyter 1992, I: 197–233.Google Scholar

Gipper, Helmut and Schmitter, Peter, Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachphilosophie im Zeitalter der Romantik, Tübingen: Günter Narr Verlag, 1979.Google Scholar

Giuliano, Cheryl Fallon, ‘Gulnare/Kaled's “untold” feminization of Byron's Oriental tales’, Studies in English literature, 1500–1900 33 (1993), pp. 785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleckner, Robert F. and Enscoe, Gerald (eds.), Romanticism: points of view, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962.Google Scholar

Gode, Alexander, Natural science in German Romanticism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1941.Google Scholar

Godwin, William, Caleb Williams, McCracken, David (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Godwin, William, ‘Of choice in reading’, in The enquirer: reflections on education, manners, and literature in a series of essays, New York: Kelley, 1965, pp. 129–46.Google Scholar

Godwin, William, ‘Of history and romance’, in Things as they are; or, the adventures of Caleb Williams, Hindle, Maurice (ed.), London: Penguin, 1988.Google Scholar

Godwin, William, ‘Of history and romance’, rpt. as ‘Essay on history and romance’, in Political and philosophical writings of William Godwin, Philp, Mark (ed.), 7 vols., London: William Pickering, 1993, VII: 290–301.Google Scholar

Godwin, William, The enquirer: reflections on education, manners, and literature, London: Robinson, 1797.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, ‘On German architecture’, in Essays on art and literature, Gearey, John (ed.), Ellen, and Nordhoff, Ernest (trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1986.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, The sorrows of young Werther. The new Melusina. Novelle, Lange, Victor (trans.), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Die Schriften zur Naturwissenschaft, Leopoldina-Ausgabe, Gunther Schmid (ed.), Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1947–.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Goethe's color theory, Aach, Herb (ed. and trans.), New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Scientific studies, Miller, Douglas (ed. and trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1988.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Sämtliche Werke nach Epochen seines Schaffens, Richter, Karl (ed.), 21 vols., Munich: Hanser, 1985–96.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Goethe's botanical writings, Mueller, Bertha (trans.), Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Elective affinities: a novel, Constantine, David (ed. and trans.), Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von, Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre (Gesamtausgabe der Werke und Schriften in zweiundzwanzig Bänden), 22 vols., Stuttgart: Cotta, 1940–1963, VII: 9–708 (trans. Blackall, Eric A., Wilhelm Meister's apprenticeship, New York: Suhrkamp, 1989).Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Wilhelm Meister's apprenticeship, Blackall, Eric A. (ed. and trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, ‘Shakespeare: a tribute’, in Essays on art and literature, Gearey, John (ed.), Nardroff, Ellen and Nardroff, Ernest H. (trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 163–5.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfang, Faust, Arndt, Walter (trans.), New York: Norton, 1976.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfang, Plays, Passage, Charles W. (trans.), New York: Frederick Ungar, 1980.Google Scholar

Goldberg, M. A., The poetics of Romanticism: toward a reading of John Keats, Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Oliver, Collected works of Oliver Goldsmith, Friedman, Arthur (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966, 5 vols.Google Scholar

Goodman, Dena, The republic of letters: a cultural history of the French Enlightenment, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Goodman, Katherine R. and Waldstein, Edith (eds.), ‘Introduction’, In the shadow of Olympus: German women writers around 1800, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Goslee, Nancy, ‘Witch or pawn: women in Scott's narrative poetry’, in Mellor, (ed.), Romanticism and feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988, pp. 115–36.Google Scholar

Grabo, Carl Henry, A Newton among poets: Shelley's use of science in ‘Prometheus Unbound’, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1930.Google Scholar

Graver, Bruce, ‘Wordsworth's georgic beginnings’, Texas studies in literature and language 33 (1991), pp. 137–59.Google Scholar

Grazia, Margreta, Shakespeare verbatim: the reproduction of authenticity and the 1790 apparatus, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenfield, Susan C., ‘“Abroad and at home”: sexual ambiguity, miscegenation, and colonial boundaries in Edgeworth's Belinda’, PMLA 112 (1997), pp. 214–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grey, Thomas S., ‘Metaphorical modes in nineteenth-century music criticism: image, narrative, and idea’, in Music and text: critical inquiries, Scher, Steven Paul (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grey, Thomas S., Wagner's musical prose: texts and contexts, Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grey, Thomas S., ‘Tableaux vivants: landscape, history painting, and the visual imagination in Mendelssohn's orchestral music’, Nineteenth-century music 31 (1997), pp. 38–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, John, The rise and fall of the man of letters: aspects of English literary life since 1800, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1969.Google Scholar

Gubar, Susan, ‘Feminist misogyny: Mary Wollstonecraft and the paradox of “it takes one to know one”’, Feminist studies 20 (1994), pp. 453–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guillén, Claudio, Literature as system: essays toward the theory of literary history, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Guillory, John, Cultural capital: the problem of literary canon formation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gundolf, Friedrich, Shakespeare und der deutsche Geist, Berlin: Bondi, 1911.Google Scholar

Gusdorf, Georges, Fondements du savoir romantique, Paris: Payot, 1982.Google Scholar

Gutwirth, Madelyn, Madame de Staël, novelist: the emergence of the artist as woman, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Gutwirth, Madelyn, The twilight of the goddesses: women and representation in the French Revolutionary era, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gutwirth, Madelyn, Goldberger, Avriel and Szmurlo, Karyna (eds.), Germaine de Staël: crossing the borders, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, Kant and the claims of taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Kant, Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, Burger, Thomas (trans.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Habicht, Werner, ‘Romanticism, antiromanticism, and the German Shakespeare tradition’, in Kishi, Tetsuo, Pringle, Roger, Wells, Stanley (eds.), Shakespeare and cultural traditions, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1994, pp. 243–52.Google Scholar

Hagstrum, Jean H., The sister arts: the tradition of literary pictorialism and English poetry from Dryden to Gray, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Hagstrum, Jean H., William Blake, poet and painter: an introduction to the illuminated verse, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Hall, Jason Y., ‘Gall's phrenology; a Romantic psychology’, Studies in Romanticism 16 (1977), pp. 305–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hallam, Henry, Introduction to the literature of Europe in the fifteenth, sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Paris: Baudry, 1839.Google Scholar

Hamburger, Käte, The logic of literature, Rose, Marilynn J. (trans.), 2nd edn, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Paul, ‘Romantic irony and English literary history’, in The Romantic heritage: a collection of critical essays, Engelberg, Karsten (ed.), Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, 1983, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Paul, Coleridge's poetics, Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar

Hamlin, Cyrus, ‘The Temporality of selfhood: metaphor and Romantic poetry’, New Literary History 6 (1974), pp. 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamlin, Cyrus, ‘Platonic dialogue and romantic irony: prolegomenon to a theory of Romantic narrative’, Canadian review of comparative literature 3 (1976)pp. 5–26.Google Scholar

Hamlin, Cyrus, ‘The origins of a philosophical genre theory in German Romanticism’, European Romantic review 5 (1994), pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Handwerk, Gary, Irony and ethics in narrative: from Schlegel to Lacan, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Handwerk, Gary, ‘Of Caleb's guilt and Godwin's truth: ideology and ethics in Caleb Williams’, ELH 60 (1993), pp. 939–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanley, Keith and Selden, Ray (eds.), Revolution and English Romanticism: politics and rhetoric, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.Google Scholar

Harding, Anthony J. ‘Felicia Hemans and the effacement of woman’, in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 138–49.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. F. C., The second coming: popular millenarianism, 1780–1850, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.Google Scholar

Hartman, Geoffrey H., Wordsworth's poetry, 1787–1815, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Hartman, Geoffrey, Wordsworth's poetry, 1787–1814, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Hartman, Geoffrey H., Beyond formalism: literary essays 1958–1970, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Hartman, Geoffrey H., The fate of reading and other essays, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Heinrich, Lord Byrons Stellung zu den Klassizisten seiner Zeit, Bottrop: Postberg, 1932.Google Scholar

Havens, Raymond Dexter, The influence of Milton on English poetry, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1922.Google Scholar

Hayden, John O., Polestar of the ancients: the Aristotelian tradition in Classical and English literary criticism, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Hays, Mary, Female biography; or memoirs of illustrious and celebrated women, of all ages and countries, London: Phillips, 1803.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., 1930–4, rpt. New York: AMS Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, Selected writings, Cook, Jon (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, ‘Lectures on the English comic writers’, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967, VI: 1–168.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, ‘Sir Walter Scott, Racine, and Shakespear’, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967, XII: 336–46.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, ‘The spirit of the age; or contemporary portraits’, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967, XI: 1–184.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, ‘The Waverley notes’, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967, XX: 231–3.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, ‘Shakespeare and Milton’, in Lectures on the English poets and the English comic writers, Hazlitt, William Carew (ed.), London: Bell, 1894.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, ‘Shakespeare and Milton’, Characters of Shakespeare's plays, London: Oxford University Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William, Lectures on the English poets, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., London: J. M. Dent, 1930–34, V: 1–168.Google Scholar