Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:41:12.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Edited by
Raman Selden
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 404 - 465
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A Barthes Reader, ed. Sontag, Susan (New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Abercrombie, David, Studies in Linguistics and Phonetics (London, 1965).Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H., ‘How to do things with texts’, Partisan Review, 46 (1979), 566–88.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H., ‘How to do things with texts’, Partisan Review, 46 (1979), 566–88.Google Scholar
Adam, Jean-Michel, Le texte narratif (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
Adam, Jean-Michel, Le r´ecit (Paris, 1984).Google Scholar
Adams, Hazard, and Searle, Leroy (eds.), Critical Theory Since 1965 (Tallahassee, FL, 1986).Google Scholar
All except you, ‘Repères’, Galerie Maeght (1983).
Alors, la Chine? (1975).
Althusser, Louis, Pour Marx (Paris, 1965); For Marx, trans. Brewster, Ben (London, 1969).Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis, Lénine et la philosophic: Marx et Lénine devant Hegel (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. Brewster, Ben (London, 1971)Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis, Pour Marx (Paris, 1966); For Marx, trans. Brewster, Ben (London, 1969)Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis, ‘Idéologic et appareils idéologiques d'Etat’, (1970), in Positions (Paris, 1976), pp. 67–125; ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatuses’, trans. Brewster, Ben, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (London, 1971), pp. 121–73.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis, ‘Freud et Lacan’ in Positions (Paris, 1976) pp. 9–34; ‘Freud and Lacan’, trans. Brewster, Ben, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, pp. 177–202.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis, ‘Letter on Art’, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, pp. 203–8.
Althusser, Louis, ‘Cremonini, painter of the abstract’, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, pp. 209–20.
Althusser, Louis, and Balibar, Etienne, Lire le Capital (Paris, 1968); Reading Capital, trans. Brewster, Ben (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles, ‘The hermeneutics of literary indeterminancy: a dissenting from the orthodoxy’, New Literary History, 10 (1978–1979), 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altieri, Charles, Act and Quality: A Theory of Literary Meaning and Humanistic Understanding (Amherst, 1981).Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles, ‘The poem as act: a way to reconcile presentation and mimetic theories’, Iowa Review, 6 (1975), 103–24.Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles, ‘The qualities of action: a theory of middles in literature’, Boundary 2, 5 (1977), 323–50, 899–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altieri, Charles, ‘The hermeneutics of literary indeterminacy: a dissent from the new orthodoxy’, New Literary History, 10 (1978), 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altieri, Charles, Act and Quality: A Theory of Literary Meaning and Humanistic Understanding (Amherst, MA, 1981).Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles, Philosophical Papers, 3rd edn., ed. Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G.J. (Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar
Anz, Heinrich, ‘Erwartungshorizont: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag zu H. R. Jauβ’ Begründung einer Rezeptionsästhetik der Literatur’, Euphorion, 70 (1976), 398–408.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl–Otto, et al., Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik (Frankfurt, 1971).Google Scholar
Arac, Jonathan, Godzich, Wlad, and Martin, Wallace (eds.), The Yale Critics: Deconstruction in America (Minneapolis, 1983).Google Scholar
Arac, Jonathan, Critical Genealogies: Historical Situations for Postmodern Literary Studies (New York, 1987).Google Scholar
Armstrong, Daniel, and Schooneveld, C. H. (eds.), Roman Jakob son. Echoes of His Scholarship (Lisse, 1977).Google Scholar
Armstrong, Paul B., ‘The conflict of interpretations and the limits of pluralism’, Publication of the Modern Language Association, 98 (1983), 341–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrivé, M., ‘Notes sur le métalangage et la d´négation lacanienne’, in Parret, and Ruprecht, , Aims and Prospects, pp. 99–112.
Arvatov, Boris, Sociologiceskaja poetika (Moscow, 1928).Google Scholar
Atkins, Douglas G., and Johnson, Michael L. (eds.), Writing and Reading Differently: Deconstruction and the Teaching of Composition and Literature (Lawrence, KS, 1985).Google Scholar
Attridge, Derek, The Rhythms of English Poetry (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Attridge, Derek, Peculiar Language: Literature as Difference from the Renaissance to James Joyce (London and Ithaca, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubral, F. and Delcourt, X., Contre la nouvelle philosophic (1978).Google Scholar
Austin, J[ohn] L., How to Do Things With Words, 2nd edn., ed. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisa, Marina (Cambridge, MA, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, La Psychanalyse du feu (Paris, 1938); The Psychoanalysis of Fire, trans. Ross, Alan C. M. (Boston, 1964).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, L'Eau et les rêves (Paris, 1942); Water and Dreams: An Essay on the Imagination of Matter, trans. Farrell, Edith R. (Dallas, 1983).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, L'Air et les songes (Paris, 1943).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, La Poétique de I'espace (Paris, 1957); The Poetics of Space, trans. Jolas, Maria (Boston, 1964).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, La Poétique de la Rêverie (Paris, 1960); The Poetics of Reverie: Childhood, Language and the Cosmos, trans. Russell, Daniel (Boston, 1969).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, On Poetic Imagination and Reverie: Selections from the Works of Gaston Bachelard, trans. Gaudin, Colette (Indianapolis, 1971).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, Fragments d'une poétique du feu (Paris, 1988).Google Scholar
Bailey, Richard W., and Burton, Dolores M., English Stylistics: A Bibliography (Cambridge, MA, 1968).Google Scholar
Bailey, R. W., Matejka, L. and Steiner, P. (eds.), The Sign: Semiotics around the World (Ann Arbor, MI, 1978).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays on the Novel, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Holquist, Michael and Emerson, Caryl (Austin, TX, 1981).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail, Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, ed. and trans. Emerson, Caryl (Minneapolis, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail, Rabelais and his World, trans. Iswolsky, Hélène (Bloomington, IN, 1984).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. Holquist, Michael and Emerson, Caryl, trans. McGee, Vern (Austin, TX, 1986).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail, Toward a Philosophy of the Act, ed. Holquist, Michael and Liapunov, Vadim, trans. Liapunov, Vadim (Austin, TX, 1981).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail, Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Works, ed. Holquist, Michael and Liapunov, Vadim, trans. Liapunov, Vadim (Austin, TX, 1990).Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke, Narratologie (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke, ‘The laughing mice; or, on focalization’, Poetics Today, 2 (1981), 202–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bal, Mieke, ‘The narrating and the focalizing: a theory of the agents in narrative’, Style, 17 (1983), 234–69.Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke, Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative, trans. Boheemen, Christine (Toronto, 1985).Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke (ed.) Poetics, 13 (1984).CrossRef
Bal, Mieke ‘Psychopoetics – theory’, Poetics, 13 (1984), 4–5.Google Scholar
Balibar, Renee, Les Français fictifs: le rapport des styles littéraires au franqais national (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
Balibar, Renee, ‘An example of literary work in France: Georges Sand's “La Mare au diable'V “The Devil's Pool” of 1846’, in 1848: The Sociology of Literature, ed. Barker, Francis et al. (Colchester, 1978), pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
Balibar, Renee, ‘National language, education, literature’, in Literature, Politics and Theory, ed. Barker, Francis et al. (London, 1986), pp. 126–47.Google Scholar
Balibar, Renee, LTnstitution de francais (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
Balibar, Reńee, and Laporte, Dominique, Le Français national: politique et practique de la language nationale sur la Révolution (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
Balibar, Renee, ‘An example of literary work in France: Georges Sand's “La Mare au diable'V “The Devil's Pool” of 1846’, in 1848: The Sociology of Literature, ed. Barker, Francis et al. (Colchester, 1978).Google Scholar
Balibar, Renee, ‘National language, education, literature’, in Literature, Politics and Theory, ed. Barker, Francis et al. (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Balibar, Renee, LTnstitution de francais (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
Balibar, Reńee, and Laporte, Dominique, Le Français national: politique et practique de la language nationale sur la Révolution (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M., ‘Deconstructive practice and legal theory’, Yale Law Journal, 96 (1987), 743–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Ann, Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction (Boston, 1982).Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann, Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction (Boston, 1982).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, and Bowlt, John E. (eds.), Russian Formalism: A Collection of Articles and Texts in Translation (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen and Bowlt, John E. (eds.), Russian Formalism (Edinburgh, 1973).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Experimental Painting (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘Language in and about the work of art’, Studio International, 942 (1972), 106–11.Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘Malcolm Hughes and the open book’, Studio International, 958 (1973), 85–90.Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Barthes, Roland, Eléments de Sémiologie (Paris, 1964); Elements of Semiology, trans. Lavcers, Annette and Smith, Colin (London, 1967).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Systéme de la Mode (Paris, 1967); The Fashion System, trans. Ward, Matthew and Howard, Richard (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘Par ou commencer’, Poétique, 1 (1970), 3–9.Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, S/Z (Paris, 1970); Eng. trans. Miller, Richard (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Sade, Fourier, Loyola (Paris, 1971); Eng. trans. Miller, Richard (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Image, Music, Text; ed. and trans. Heath, Stephen (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Dessins (Les Sables d'Olonne, 1981).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, L'Obvie et l'obtus (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Michelet, trans. Howard, Richard (New York, 1987).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘Structuralism and the revival of rhetoric’, in Routh, Jane and Wolff, Janet (eds.), The Sociology of Literature: Theoretical Approaches, Sociological Review monograph 25 (Keele, 1977), pp. 68–84.Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘The career of Tel Quel: Tel Quel becomes L'lnfin’, Comparative Criticism, 6 (1984), pp. 327–39.Google Scholar
Barck, Karlheinz, ‘Rezeptionsästhetik und soziale Funktion der Literatur’, Weimarer Beiträge, 31, (1985), 1131–49.Google Scholar
Barck, Karlheinz, and Fontius, Martin, ‘Von der Rezeptions asthetik zur literarischen Hermeneutik’, Weimarer Beiträge, 32 (1986), 333–42.Google Scholar
Barker, Francis, Solzhenitsyn: Politics and Form (London, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Francis et al. (eds.), Literature, Society, and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977).Google Scholar
Barker, Francis1848: The Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1978).Google Scholar
Barker, FrancisThe Politics of Theory (Colchester, 1983).Google Scholar
Barker, FrancisLiterature, Politics and Theory (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Barker, Francis, Solzhenitsyn: Politics and Form (London, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Francis et al. (eds.), Literature, Society, and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977).Google Scholar
Barker, Francis1848: The Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1978).Google Scholar
Barker, FrancisThe Politics of Theory (Colchester, 1983).Google Scholar
Barker, FrancisLiterature, Politics and Theory (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Barker, Francis, ‘Althusser and art’, Red Letters, 4 (1977), 7–12.Google Scholar
Barner, Wilfried, ‘Rezeptions- und Wirkungsgeschichte’, in Brackert, Helmut and Stückrath, Jörn (eds.), Literatur wissenschaft: Grundkurs 2, (Reinbeck, 1981)81), pp. 102–24.Google Scholar
Barney, Richard A., ‘Uncanny criticism in the United States’, in Tracing Literary Theory, ed. Natoli, Joseph (Urbana IL, 1987).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, Mythologies (Paris, 1957); Mythologies, trans. Lavers, Annette (London, 1972); The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies, trans. Howard, Richard (New York, 1979).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, Sur Racine (Paris, 1963); On Racine, trans. Howard, Richard (New York, 1983).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, Eléments de sémiologie (Paris, 1964); Elements of Semiology, trans. Lavers, Annette and Smith, Colin (London, 1967).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, Image-Music-Text, ed. and trans. Heath, Stephen (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, ‘Introduction à l'analyse structurale des réciks’, Communications, 8 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, Roland, ‘Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives’, trans. Heath, Stephen, in Heath, (ed.), Image-Music-Text, pp. 79–124.
Barthes, Roland, Système de la mode (Paris, 1967); The Fashion System, trans. Ward, Matthew and Howard, Richard (New York, 1983).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, S/Z (Paris, 1970); S/Z, trans Miller, Richard (New York, 1974).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, ‘Introduction à l'analyse structurale des réeks’, Communications, 8 (1966), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, Roland, S/Z (Paris, 1970). Eng. trans. Miller, Richard (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, ‘Introduction à l'analyse structurale des récits’, Communications, 8 (1966), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, Roland, S/Z (Paris, 1970); trans. Miller, Richard (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, Le Plaisir du texte (Paris, 1973); The Pleasure of the Text, trans. Miller, Richard (London, 1976).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, Fragments d'un discours amoureux (Paris, 1977); A Lover's Discourse. Fragments, trans. Howard, Richard (New York, 1978; London, 1979).Google Scholar
Barthes après Barthes, une actualité en question 5. Actes du colloque international de Paris, ed. Coquio, C. and Salado, R. (1994).Google Scholar
‘Barthes critique le “Barthes” de Barthes’, also entitled ‘Barthes puissance trois’ (Barthes to the third power), La Quinzaine littéraire 1–15 March, 1975.
Bastide, Roger (ed.), Sens et usage du terme structure dans les sciences humaines et sociales, 2nd edn (The Hague, 1972).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, L'Erotisme (Paris, 1957); Eroticism: Death and Sensuality, trans. Dalwood, Mary (San Francisco, 1972).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, L'Expérience intérieure (Paris, 1954); Inner Experience, trans. Boldt, Leslie Anne (Albany, 1988).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, La Littérature et le mal (Paris, 1957); Literature and Evil trans. Hamilton, Alastaire (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, Histoire de Voeil (Paris, 1967); Story of the Eye, trans. Neugroschel, Joachim (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, Visions of Excess: Selected Writings 1927–1939, trans. Stoekl, Allan (Minneapolis, 1985).Google Scholar
Bate, Walter Jackson, ‘The crisis of English studies’, Harvard Magazine, 85 (Sept.–Oct., 1982), 45–55.Google Scholar
Bathrich, David, ‘The politics of reception theory in the GDR’, Minnesota Review, 5 (1975), 125–33.Google Scholar
Bathrich, David, ‘La Point de vue de la réception: Prestiges et problèmes d'une perspective’, Revue des Sciences Humaines, 40, n. 189, (1983), 21–36.Google Scholar
Batsleer, Janet, Davis, Tony, O'Rourke, Rebecca and Weedon, Chris, Rewriting English: Cultural Politics of Gender and Class (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Baudry, Jean-Louis, ‘Linguistique et production textuelle’, in Tel Quel: Th´orie d'ensemble (Paris, 1968), pp. 351–64.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe C., The Possibility of Criticism (New Haven, 1970).Google Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe ‘The concept of literature’, in Brady, Frank, Palmer, John, and Price, Martin (eds.), Literary Theory and Structure: Essays in Honor of William K. Wismatt (New Haven, 1973), pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
Bédier, Joseph, Les fabliaux: études de littérature populaire et d'histoire littéraire du moyen-âdge (1893; 6th edn Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Béguin, Albert, L'Ame romantique et le rêve: essai sur la romantisme allemand et la poésie francaise, 2 vols. (Marseilles, 1937).Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘The new hermeneutics and comparative literature’, Neohelicon, 10 (1983), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnhabib, Seyla, ‘Epistemologies of postmodernism: a rejoinder to Jean-Francois Lyotard’, New German Critique, 33 (1984), 103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsey, Catherine, Critical Practice (London, 1980).Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine, The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine, ‘The Romantic construction of the unconscious’, Literature, Politics, and Theory, ed. Barker, Francis et al. (London, 1986), pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
Bennett, James R., Bibliography of Stylistics and Related Criticism, 1967–83 (New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony, Formalism and Marxism (London, 1979).Google Scholar
Bennington, Geoffrey, and Derrida, Jacques, Jacques Derrida (Chicago and London, 1993).Google Scholar
Bensmaia, R., The Barthes Effect (Minneapolis, 1987).Google Scholar
Benton, Ted, The Rise and Fall of Structural Marxism (London, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile, Problèmes de linguistique générale (2 vols.) vol. I, (Paris, 1966), vol. 2, (Paris, 1974); Problems in General Linguistics, trans. Meek, Mary E. (Coral Gables, 1971).Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile, Problèmes de linguistique générate (Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile, ‘La philosophic analytique et le language’, in Problems de linguistique generale, Volume I (Paris, 1966), pp. 267–76; trans, as ‘Analytical philosophy and language; in Problems in General Linguistics, Volume I (Coral Gables, FL, 1971), pp. 231–8.Google Scholar
Benvenuto, Bice, and Kennedy, Roger, The Works of Jacques Lacan (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard, ‘Serious play: the ethico-political horizon of Jacques Derrida’, Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 1 (1987), 93–117.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J., Beyond Objectivity and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis, (Philadelphia, 1983).Google Scholar
Bernstejn, Sergei, ‘Esteticeskie predposylki teorii deklamacii’, Poètika, 3 (1927), 25–44.Google Scholar
Bernstejn, Sergei, ‘Stich i deklamacija’, Russkaja rec’: Novaja serija, I (Leningrad, 1927).Google Scholar
Betti, Emilio, Theoria generale della interpretazione (Milan, 1955).Google Scholar
Billaz, André, ‘La Problématique de la “réception” dans les deux Allemagnes’, Revue d'Histoire Littér aire de la France, 81 (1981), 109–20.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, Lautréamont et Sade (Paris, 1949).Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, L'Espace littéraire (Paris, 1955); The Space of Literature, trans. Smock, Ann (Lincoln, 1982).Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, L'Entretien infini (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, The Sirens' Song: Selected Essays, trans. Rabinovitch, Sacha (Brighton, 1982).Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, The Gaze of Orpheus and Other Literary Essays, trans. Davis, Lydia (Barrytown, NY, 1981).Google Scholar
Bleich, David, Readings and Feelings: An Introduction to Subjective Criticism (Providence,IL, 1975).Google Scholar
Bleicher, Josef, Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique (London, 1980).Google Scholar
Bleicher, Josef, The Hermeneutic Imagination: Outline of a Positive Critique of Scientism and SociologyLondon, 1982).Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard, and Trager, George L., Outline of Linguistic Analysis (Baltimore, 1942).Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold et al., Deconstruction and Criticism (New York, 1979).Google Scholar
Bloom, Edward (ed.), ‘In defense of authors and readers: a discussion by Wayne Booth, Wolfgang Iser, et al.’, Novel, 11 (1977), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard, Language (New York, 1933).Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard, review of Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale, Modern Language Journal, 8 (1924), 317–19. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure (Geneva, 1941– ).
Boeckh, Philip August, Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der philologischen Wissenschaften, 2nd edn (Leipzig, 1886); On Interpretation and Criticism, trans. Pritchard, John Paul (Norman, OK, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogatyrëv, Petr, and Roman Jakobson, ‘Slavjanskaja filologija v Rosii za gg. 1914–1921’, Slavia, 1 (1922), 171–84, 457–69, 626–36.Google Scholar
Bogatyrjov, Petr, Funkcie kroja na Maravskom Slovensku (Turčiansky sv. Martin, 1937); The Functions of Folk Costume in Moravian Slovakia, trans. Crum, Richard G. (The Hague, 1971).Google Scholar
Bois, Y. -A., ‘Ecrivain, artisan, narrateur’, in Critique, 423–4 (1982), 655–62.Google Scholar
Bojtár, Endre, Slavic Structuralism (Amsterdam, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Jürgen, ‘Die hermeneutische Spirale: überlegungen zu einer integrativen Literaturtheorie’, Poetica, 17 (1985), 355–71.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, Marie, Life and Works of Edgar Allen Poe, trans. Rodker, J. (London, 1940).Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C., The Rhetoric of Fiction (1961; 2nd edn, Chicago, 1981).Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen, An Essay on Shakespeare's Sonnets (New Haven, 1969).Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen, ‘On the value of Hamlet’, in Rabkin, Norman (ed.), Reinterpretations of Elizabethan Drama: Selected Papers from the English Institute (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C., The Rhetoric of Fiction (Chicago, 1961; 2nd ed., 1983).Google Scholar
Booth, WayneA Rhetoric of Irony (Chicago, 1974).Google Scholar
Booth, WayneCritical Understanding: The Powers and Limits of Pluralism (Chicago, 1979).Google Scholar
Booth, WayneThe Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1988).Google Scholar
Boris, Eikhenbaum, and Tynyanov, Juri (eds.), Russian Prose, trans. Parrott, R. (Ann Arbor, MI, 1985).Google Scholar
Böschenstein, Bernhard, ‘Peter Szondi: “Studies on Hölderlin"; exemplarity of a path’, Boundary 2, 11 (1983), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böschenstein, Bernhard, Boundary 2, 5, no. 2 (1977).
Bouché, C., ‘Materialist literary theory in France, 1965–75’, Praxis, 5 (1981), 3–20.Google Scholar
Bouscasse, S. and Bourgeois, D., Faut-il brûler les nouveaux philosophes? (1978).Google Scholar
Bouveresse, Jaques, Le Philosophe chez les Autophages (Paris, 1984).Google Scholar
Bove, Paul A., ‘Variations on authority: some deconstructive transformations of the new criticism’, in Arac, Jonathan, Godzich, Wlad, Martin, Wallace (eds.), The Yale Critics: Deconstruction in America (Minneapolis, 1983), pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Bové, Paul A., Destructive Poetics: Heidegger and Modern American Poetry (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
Bové, Paul A., Destructive Poetics: Heidegger and Modern American Poetry (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Bowie, Malcolm, Freud, Proust and Lacan (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Bozarth–Cambell, Alia, The Word's Body: An Incarnational Aesthetic of Interpretation (University, AL, 1979).Google Scholar
Bremond, Claude ‘Le message narrati’, Communications, 4 (1964), 4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremond, Claude ‘La logique des possibles narratifs’,
Bremond, ClaudeLogique du récit (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Brenkman, John, ‘The Other and the One: Psychoanalysis, reading, the Sympo sium’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 396–456.Google Scholar
Brewer, Maria Minich, ‘A loosening of tongues: from narrative economy to women writing’, Modern Language Notes, 99 (1984), 1141–161.Google Scholar
Brik, Osip, ‘Zvukovye povtory’, in Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka, II (Petersburg, 1917).Google Scholar
Brik, Osip, ‘T.n. “formal ‘nyj metod’”, Lef 1 (1923).213–15.Google Scholar
Brik, Osip, ‘Ritm i sintaksis: Materialy k izuceniju poeticeskoj reci’, Novyj Lef, 3–6 (1927).15–20, 23–9, 32–7, 33–9.Google Scholar
Britton, Celia, Claude Simon: Writing the Visible (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Britton, Celia, ‘The nouveau roman and Tel Quel Marxism’, Paragraph, 12 (1989), 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodtkorb, Paul, Ishmael's White Whale: A Phenomenological Reading of ‘Moby Dick’, (New Haven, 1965).Google Scholar
Broekman, Jan M., Strukturalismus. Moskau – Prag – Paris (Freiburg, 1971).Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter, Reading for the Plot. Design and Intention in Narrative (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Brown, A., Roland Barthes: The Figures of Writing (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
Brunet, Manon, ‘Pour une esthétique de la production de la réception’, Etudes Francoises, 19 (1983/1984), 65–82.Google Scholar
Bruns, Gerald, Inventions, Writing, Textuality, and Understanding in Literary History (New Haven, 1982).Google Scholar
Bruns, Gerald, Hermeneutics, Ancient and Modern (New Haven, 1992).Google Scholar
Bryson, Norman, Vision and Painting (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Bryson, Norman (ed.), Calligram – Essays in New Art History from France (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Bubner, Rüdiger, Modern German Philosophy, trans. Matthews, Eric (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
Bubner, Rüdiger, Essays in Hermeneutics and Critical Theory, trans. Matthews, Eric (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Buck, Günther, ‘Von der Texthermeneutik zur Handlungshermeneutik’, in Fuhrmann, Man fred et al. (ed.), Text und Applikation: Theologie, Jurisprudenz und Literaturwissenschaft im hermeneutischen Gespräch (Munich, 1981), pp. 525–36.Google Scholar
Buck, Günther,, ‘Hermeneutics of texts and hermeneutics of action’, New Literary History, 4 (1980), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, Günther, ‘The structure of hermeneutic experience and the problem of tradition’, New Literary History, 10 (1981), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffat, , ‘Le simulacre’, in Tel Quel, 47 (1971), 108–14.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl, Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache (Jena, 1934).Google Scholar
Bulygina, T. B., ‘Pražskaja lingvističeskaja škola’ [The Prague Linguistic School], Guchman, in M. M. and Jarceva, V. N. (eds.), Osnovnye napravlenija strukturalizma (Moscow, 1964), 46–126.Google Scholar
Burg, Peter, Jan Mukařovský. Genese und System der tschechischen strukturalen Asthetik (Munich, 1985).Google Scholar
Bürger, Peter, ‘Probleme der Rezeptions forschung’, Poetica, 9 (1977), 446–71.Google Scholar
Burgin, Victor, The End of Art Theory: Criticism and Postmodernity (London, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgin, Victor, Cinema Semiotics and the Work of Christian Metz, Screen special double issue, 14 (1973).Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth, ‘Psychology and form’ (1924), in Counter-Statement (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1968), pp. 29–44.Google Scholar
Burniston, S. and Weedon, C., ‘Ideology, subjectivity and the artistic text’, in Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, On Ideology (London, 1978), pp. 216–22.Google Scholar
Bush, Douglas, ‘Professor Fish on the Milton Variorum’, Critical Inquiry, 3 (1976), 179–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butor, M. ‘La Fascinatrice’ (1968), in Répertoire IV (1974), pp. 371–97.Google Scholar
Buttigieg, Joseph A. (ed.), Criticism Without Boundaries: Directions and Crosscurrents in Postmodern Critical Theory (Notre Dame, 1987).Google Scholar
‘Ça prend’ (on Proust), Le Magazine littéraire, 144 (December 1978).
Calvet, L. -J., Roland Barthes, un regard politique sur le signe (1973).Google Scholar
Camile, Michael, ‘The book of signs: writing and visual difference in Gothic manuscript illuminations’, Word & Image, 1 (1985), 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caputo, John D., Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction and the Hermeneutic Project (Bloomington, 1987).Google Scholar
Caputo, JohnComparative Criticism, 5 (1983).
Carroll, David, The Subject in Question (Chicago, 1982).Google Scholar
Carte e segni. A catalogue of an exhibition of Barthes' paintings and drawings (Milan, 1981).
Cavell, Stanley, Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays (1969; rpt. Cambridge, 1976).Google Scholar
Caws, Peter, Structuralism: The Art of the Intelligible (Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1988).Google Scholar
Caws, Mary Ann, Surrealism and the Literary Imagination: A Study of Breton and Bachelard (The Hague, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, On Ideology (London, 1978) (Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 10).
Červenka, Miroslav, ‘O Vodicčkově metodologii literárnich dejin’ [On Vodička's methodology of literary history], in F. Vodička, Struktura vývoje (Prague, 1969), 329–50.Google Scholar
Červenka, Miroslav, ‘Semantic contexts’, Poetics, 4 (1972), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Červenka, Miroslav, ‘Die Grundkategorien des Prager literaturwissenschaftlichen Strukturalismus’, in Žmegač, and Škreb, (eds.), Kritik, 137–68.
Červenka, Miroslav, and Jankovič, Milan (eds.), The Prague Structuralist School Its History and Future (forthcoming).
Chabrol, Claude, Le récit féminin. Contribution sémiologique à l'analyse du courrier du coeur et des entrevues ou ‘enquêtes’ sur la femme dans la presse féminine actuelle (The Hague, 1971).Google Scholar
Chabrol, C., Sémiotique narrative et textuelle (1973).Google Scholar
Chambers, Ross, Story and Situation: Narrative Seduction and the Power of Fiction (Minneapolis, 1984).Google Scholar
Champagne, R., Literary History in the wake of Roland Barthes: Re-Defining the Myths of Reading (Birmingham, AL, 1984).Google Scholar
Chase, Cynthia, ‘The decomposition of the elephants: double-reading Daniel Deronda’ in Decomposing Figures: Rhetorical Readings in the Romantic Tradition (Baltimore, 1986), pp. 157–74.Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour, and Levin, Samuel R., ‘Linguistics and literature’, in Sebeok, (ed.), Trends, X 250–94.
Chatman, Seymour, A Theory of Meter (The Hague, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatman, Seymour, The Late Style of Henry James (Oxford, 1972).Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour (ed.), Literary Style: A Symposium (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour, Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film (Ithaca, 1978).Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour, Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film (Ithaca, 1990).Google Scholar
Cherry, Collin, On Human Communication (Cambridge, MA, New York, London, 1957).Google Scholar
Chevrel, Yves, ‘De l'histoire de la réception à l'histoire des mentalités: l'example du naturalisme français en Allemagne au tournant siécle’, Synthesis, 10 (1983). 53–64.Google Scholar
Chevrel, Yves, ‘Théories de la réception: Perspectives comparatistes’, Degrés, 12, no. 39–40 (1984), j1–j15.Google Scholar
Chevrel, Yves, ‘Méthodologie de la recéption: de la recherche à l'enseignement’, Neohelicon, 12, n. 1 (1985). 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevrel, Yves, ‘Champs des études comparatistes de réception: Etat des recherches’, Oeuvres & Critiques, 11 (1986), 147–60.Google Scholar
Chladenius, Johann Martin, Einleitung zur richtigen Auslegung vernunftiger Reden and Schriften (Leipzig, 1742).Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Syntactic Structures (The Hague, 1957).Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (The Hague, 1964).Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA, 1965).Google Scholar
Christofides, G. C., ‘Gaston Bachelard's phenomenology of the imagination’, Romantic Review, 52 (1961), 36–47.Google Scholar
Christofides, G. C. ‘Bachelard's aesthetics’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 20 (1962), 263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chvatfk, Květoslav, Tschechoslowakischer Strukturalismus. Theorie und Geschichte (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
Chvatfk, Květoslav, ‘Semiotics of a literary work of art. Dedicated to the 90th birthday of Jan Mukařovský (1981–1975)’, Semiotica, 37 (1981)193–214.Google Scholar
Clark, Katerina and Holquist, Michael, Mikhail Bakhtin (Cambridge, MA, 1985).Google Scholar
Cleanth, Brooks and Warren, Robert Penn, Understanding Fiction (New York, 1943).Google Scholar
Clément, Catherine, Miroirs du sujet (Paris, 1975).Google Scholar
Clément, Catherine, Vies et légendes de Jacques Lacan (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
Cohen, Ralph, The Art of Discrimination. Thomson's The Seasons and the Language of Criticism (London, 1964).Google Scholar
Cohn, Dorrit, Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction (Princeton, 1978).Google Scholar
Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Volume III: Speech Acts (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
Collin, Françhise, Maurice Blanchot et la question de Vécriture (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
Collin, Françhise, Critique, 20 (1964), 1007–64 [On-Merleau-Ponty].
Communications, 36 (1982).
Compagnon, A. (ed.), Prétexte: Roland Barthes, Acts of a Colloquium at Cerisy-la-Salle (1977), 1978.Google Scholar
Con Davis, Robert (ed.), The Fictional Father: Lacanian Readings of the Text (Massachusetts, 1981).Google Scholar
Con Davis, Robert (ed.), Special issue: ‘Lacan and narration’, Modern Language Notes, 98 (1983).Google Scholar
Con Davis, Robert ‘Introduction: Lacan and narration’, Modern Language Notes, 98 (1983), pp. 849–59.Google Scholar
Con Davis, Robert ‘Lacan, Poe, and narrative repression’, Modern Language Notes, 98 (1983), pp. 983–1005.Google Scholar
Connolly, John M., ‘Gadamer and the author's authority: a language–game approach’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 44 (1986), 272–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Waldemar, ‘Der ästhetische Gegenstand: Eine ph¨nomenologische Studie’, Zeitschriftfur Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 3 (1908) and 4 (1909), 400–55.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla, Rosenfeld, Michael and Carlson, David Grey, Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice (New York and London, 1992).Google Scholar
Coste, Didier, Narrative as Communication (Minneapolis, 1989).Google Scholar
Courtés, Joseph, Introduction à la sémiotique narrative et discursive (Paris, 1976).Google Scholar
Coward, Rosalind and Ellis, John, Language and Materialism: Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Cramer, Konrad, and Wiehl, Reiner (eds.), Hermeneutik und Dialektik, 2 vols. (Tübingen, 1970).Google Scholar
Crews, Frederick, ‘Reductionism and its discontents’, Critical Inquiry, 1 (1975), 543–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crews, Frederick, ‘Criticism without constraint’, Commentary, 73 (January 1982), 65–71.Google Scholar
Critique, 302 (1972), 423–4 (1982)
Critique et vérité (1966); Criticism and Truth, trans. Keuneman, Katrine Pilcher (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Crosman, Robert, ‘Some doubts about the reader of Paradise Lost’, College English, 37 (1975), 372–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosman, Robert, Reading Paradise Lost (Bloomington, IN, 1980).Google Scholar
Crosman, Robert, ‘Do readers make meaning?’, in Suleiman, Susan R. and Wimmers, Inge Crosman (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 149–64.Google Scholar
Crosman, Robert, ‘How readers make meaning,’ College Literature, 9 (1982), 207–15.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, 1975).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Saussure (Glasgow, 1976).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction (London, 1981).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, On Deconstruction (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Framing the Sign: Criticism and its Institutions (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Saussure (London, 1976).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction (Ithaca, 1981).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, 1975).Google Scholar
Culler, J., Barthes (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism (Ithaca, NY, 1982).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Framing The Sign: Criticism and its Institutions (Norman, OK, 1989).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, 1975).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction (Ithaca, 1981).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
Cultural Hermeneutics, special issue on hermeneutics and critical theory, 2, no. 4 (1975).
Dällenbach, Lucien, Le récit spéculaire (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
Damisch, Hubert, Théorie du nuage (Paris, 1972).Google Scholar
Damisch, Hubert, ‘Equals infinity’, trans. Olorenshaw, R.H., 20th Century Studies, 15/16 (1976), 56–81.Google Scholar
Damisch, Hubert, Fenetre jaune cadmium (Paris, 1984).Google Scholar
Danesš, František, ‘On linguistic strata (levels)’, in Travaux linguistiques de Prague, IV (1971)127–43.Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, ‘Wissenschaftstheorie, Hermeneutik, Literaturwissenschaft: Anmerkungen zu einem unterbliebenen und Beiträge zu einem künftigen Dialog über die Methodologie des Verstehens’, Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift, 58 (1984), 167–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasenbrock, Reed W. (ed.), Redrawing the Lines: Analytic Philosophy, Deconstruction, and Literary Theory (Minneapolis, 1989).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald, ‘The myth of the subjective’, in Krausz, Michael (ed.), Relativism (Notre Dame, 1989), pp. 159–72.Google Scholar
Davies, T., ‘Education, ideology, and literature’, Red Letters, 7 (1978), 4–15.Google Scholar
Davis, Robert C., and Schleifer, Ronald (eds.), Rhetoric and Form: Deconstruction at Yale (Norman, OK, 1985).Google Scholar
Davis, Walter A., ‘The Fisher King: Wille zur Macht in Baltimore,’ Critical Inquiry, 10 (1984), 668–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Walter ‘Offending the profession (after Peter Handke)’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1984), 706–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debray, R., Le pouvoir intellectuel en France (1979).Google Scholar
Delay, Jean, La Jeunesse d André Gide (Paris, 1956).Google Scholar
DeLoach, Bill, ‘On first looking into Ricoeur's Interpretation Theory: a beginner's guide’, Pre/Text, 4 (1983), 225–36.Google Scholar
Delord, J., Roland Barthes et la photographie (1981).Google Scholar
DeMaria, Robert Jr., ‘The ideal reader: a critical fiction’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 93 (1978), 463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Man, Paul, Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (New Haven, CT, 1979).Google Scholar
De Man, Paul, Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism (1971; rpt. Minneapolis, 1983).Google Scholar
de Man, Paul, Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism, 2nd ed. (London, 1983).Google Scholar
De Man, Paul, Critical Writings 1953–1978, ed. and intro.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, De la grammatologie (Paris, 1967); Of Grammatology, trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (Baltimore, 1976).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Positionsi (Paris, 1972); Positions, trans. Bass, Alan (Chicago, 1981).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Dissemination, trans. Johnson, Barbara (Chicago, 1981).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Of Grammatology, trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (Baltimore and London, 1976).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Limited Inc abc’, Glyph, 2 (1977), 162–254; rpt. in Limited Inc (Evanstone, IL, 1988) along with ‘Afterword: toward an ethic of discussion’.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Writing and Difference, trans. Bass, Alan (Chicago, 1978).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Positions, trans. Bass, Alan (Chicago, 1981).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass, Alan (Chicago, 1982).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Racism's Last Word’, Critical Inquiry, 12 (Autumn, 1985), 290–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘But Beyond…(letter to Anne McClintock and Rob Nixon)’, Critical Inquiry, 13 (Autumn, 1986), 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘The purveyor of truth’, Yale French Studies 52 (1975), 31–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Force et signification’, Critique, 19 (1963), 483–99, 619–36.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘But, beyond …. (Open Letter to Anne McClintock and Rob Nixon)’, trans. Kamuf, Peggy, Critical Inquiry, 13 (1986), 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Limited Inc abc ….’ (Baltimore, 1977), 162–254.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Limited Inc abc …’ trans. Weber, Samuel, Glyph, 2 (1977).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Signature evenement contexte’, in Marges de la Philosophie (Paris, 1972), pp. 365–93Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Signature Event Context’, trans. Weber, Samuel and Mehlman, Jeffrey, Glyph, 1 (1977), 172–97Google Scholar
Descombes, Vincent, Modern French Philosophy, trans. Scott-Fox, L. and Harding, J. M. (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Detweiler, Robert, Story, Sign, and Self: Phenomenology and Structuralism as Literary Critical Methods (Philadelphia, 1978).Google Scholar
‘Deux femmes’, in Actes d'un procès pour viol en 1612, Editions des Femmes (1984), pp. xiii–xvii.
Dews, Peter, Logics of Disintegration: Post-Structuralist Thought and the Claims of Critical Theory (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Ingen, Ferdinand et al. (eds.), Dichter und Leser: Studien zur Literatur (Groningen, 1972).Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges, ‘The index of the absent wound’, in Michelson, Annette et al. (eds.), October – The First Decade (London, 1987), pp. 39–57.Google Scholar
‘Digressions’ in Le bruissement (omitted in Rustle) Rustle), pp. 83–96.
Dilthey, Wilhelm, Gesammelie Schriften (Göttingen–Stuttgart, 1914–1977).Google Scholar
Divver, Albert, ‘Tracing hermeneutics’, in Natoli, Joseph (ed.), Tracing Literary Theory (Urbana, 1987), pp. 54–79.Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir, Narrative Modes in Czech Literature (Toronto, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir, Occidental Poetics. Tradition and Progress (Lincoln, NE, 1990).Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir, ‘Roman Jakobson as a student of communication’, in Proceedings of the Roman Jakobson Colloquium (Rome, 1990)103–12.Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomfír, Narrative Modes in Czech Literature (Toronto, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doležel, Lubomfír, ‘Narrative semantics’, PTL, 1, (1976), 129–51.Google Scholar
Donato, Eugenio, ‘Language, vision and phenomenology: Merleau-Ponty as a test case’, Modern Language Notes, 85 (1970), 803–14.Google Scholar
Doubrovsky, S., ‘Une écriture tragique’, in Poétique, 47 (1981), 329–54.Google Scholar
Douglas, Kenneth, ‘Blanchot and Sartre’, Yale French Studies, 2 (1949), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droysen, Johann Gustav, Historik: Vorlesungen über Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der Geschichte (Munich, 1858); Outline of the Principles of History, trans. Andrews, E. Benjamin (Boston, 1897).Google Scholar
Dubrovsky, Serge, Pourquoi la nouvelle critique (Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald, and Todorov, Tzvetan, Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, trans. Porter, Catherine (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald and Todorov, Tzvetan, Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, trans. Porter, Catherine (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, Phénoménologie de Vexpérience esthétique (Paris, 1952); The Phenom enology of Aesthetic Experience, trans. Casey, Edward S. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, Le poétique (Paris, 1963).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, Esthétique et philosophic, 3 vols. (Paris: 1967–1981).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, ‘On the phenomenology and semiology of art’, Phenomenology and Natural Existence, ed. Riepe, Dale (Albany, 1973p83–94).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, In the Presence of the Sensuous: Essays in Aesthetics, trans. Roberts, Mark S. and Gallagher, Dennis (Atlantic Highlands, 1987).Google Scholar
Dundes, Alan, The Morphology of North American Indian Folktales (Helsinki, 1964).Google Scholar
Durand, Régis, ‘On aphanisis: a note on the dramaturgy of the subject in narrative analysis’, Modern Language Notes, 98 (1983), 860–70.Google Scholar
Eagle, Herbert (ed.), Russian Formalist Film Theory (Ann Arbor, MI, 1981).Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, Myths of Power: A Marxist Study of the Brontes (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory (London, 1976).Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, Marxism and Literary Criticism (London, 1976).Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, ‘Ecriture and 18th century fiction’, in Barker, F. et al. (eds.), Literature, Society and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977), pp. 55–8.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, ‘Tennyson: politics and society in “The Princess” and “In Memorian”’, in Barker, F. et al. (eds.), 1848: The Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1978), pp. 97–106.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, Literary Theory (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, Literary Theory: An Introduction (Minneapolis, 1983).Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, ‘The revolt of the reader’, in Against the Grain: Essays 1975–1985 (London, 1986), pp. 181–84.Google Scholar
Eaton, Marcia M., ‘Art, artifacts, and intentions’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 6 (1969), 165–9.Google Scholar
Eaton, Marcia ‘The truth value of literary statements,’ British Journal of Aesthetics, 12 (1972), 163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Marcia ‘James's turn of the speech-act’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 23 (1983), 333–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberling, Gerhard, ‘Hermeneutik’, in Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 3rd edn, vol. 3 (Tübingen, 1962), pp. 242–64.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto, ‘The influence of Roman Jakobson on the development of semiotics’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson39–58.
Eco, Umberto, A Theory of Semiotics (Bloomington, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, Umberto, Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language (London, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, Umberto, Travels in Hyperreality, trans. Weaver, William (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto, ‘Intentio Lectoris: the state of the art’, Differentia, 2 (Spring 1988), 147–68.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto, The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts (Bloomington, 1979).Google Scholar
Effenberger, Vratislav, ‘Roman Jakobson and the Czech avant-garde between two wars’, American Journal of Semiotics, 2, (1983), 3 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efimov, Nikola, ‘Formalizm v russkom hteraturovedenii’, Smolenskij gosudarstvennyj universitet: Naucnye izvestija, vol. 5, pt. 3 (Smolensk, 1925).Google Scholar
Ehlers, Klaas-Hinrich, Das dynamische System: Zur Entwicklung von Begriffund Metaphorik des System bei Jurij Tynjanov (New York, 1992).Google Scholar
Ehrmann, Jacques (ed), Structuralism (New York, 1970) (first pub. as Yale French Studies, 36–7 (1966)).
Ehrmann, Jacques, ‘Introduction to Gaston Bachelard’, Modern Language Notes 81 (1966), 572–78.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, Molodoj Tolstoj (Petersburg–Berlin, 1922).Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, Melodika russkogo liriceskogosticha (Petersburg, 1922).Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, Anna Achmatova: Opyt analiza (Petersburg, 1923).Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, Lermontov: Opyt istoriko-literaturnoj ocenki (Leningrad, 1924).Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, Skvoz' literaturu (Leningrad, 1924).Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, Literatura: Teorija, kritika, polemika (Leningrad, 1927).Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, Moj vremennik (Leningrad, 1929).Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, Aufsätze zur Theorie und Geschichte der Literatur, trans. Kämpfe, A. (Frankfurt, 1965).Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, The Young Tolstoi, trans. Kern, G. (Ann Arbor, MI, 1972).Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris, Lermontov: A Study in Literary-Historical Evaluation, trans. Parrot, R. and Weber, H. (Ann Arbor, MI, 1981).Google Scholar
Ejxenbaum, Boris M., ‘O'Henry and the theory of the short story’, in Matejka, Ladislav and Pomorska, Krystyna (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics (Cambridge, MA, 1971), pp. 227–70.Google Scholar
Ejxenbaum, Boris ‘The theory of the formal method’, in Matejka, Ladislav and Pomorska, Krystyna (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics (Cambridge, MA, 1971), pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
Eléments de sémiologie (1964), reprinted with Le degré zéro de l'écriture with a new foreword (1965); Elements of Semiology, trans. Lavers, Annette and Smith, Colin (London, 1964).Google Scholar
Elliott, Gregory, Althussim: The Detour of Theory (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Ellmann, Maud, ‘Disremembering Dedalus: “A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man’”, in Young, R. (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post–Structuralist Reader (London, 1981), pp. 189–206.Google Scholar
Eng, Jan, ‘The effectiveness of the aesthetic function’, in Steiner, , Červenka, and Vroon, (eds.), Structure137–59.
Eribon, D., Michel Foucault (1989). Many mentions of Barthes.Google Scholar
Erlich, Victor, Russian Formalism: History–Doctrine, 3rd edn (The Hague, 1969); American edn (New Haven, 1981).Google Scholar
Erlich, Victor (ed.), Twentieth-Century Russian Literary Criticism (New Haven, 1975).Google Scholar
Erlich, Victor, Russian Formalism. History–Doctrine, 2nd edn. (The Hague, 1965).Google Scholar
Erlich, Victor, Russian Formalism: History–Doctrine (1955; third edn, New Haven, 1981).Google Scholar
Esbroeck, Michel, Herméneutique, structuralisme et exégése (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Eschbach, Achim (ed.), Bühler-Studien, 2 vols. (Frankfurt-on-Main, 1984).Google Scholar
Peer, Willie, ‘Bühlers Organon-Modell und die Semiotik der Kunst’, in Eschbach, (ed.), Bühler-Studien, I, pp. 161–205.
Essais Critiques (1964); Critical Essays, trans. Howard, Richard (Evanston, 1974).Google Scholar
Fabb, Nigel, et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature (Manchester, 1987).Google Scholar
Fages, J. -B. (Jules Gritti), Comprendre Roland Barthes (Toulouse, 1979).Google Scholar
Falk, Eugene H., The Poetics of Roman Ingarden (Chapel Hill, 1981).Google Scholar
Farber, Marvin, The Aims of Phenomenology: The Motives, Methods, and Impact of Husserl's Thought (New York, 1966).Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, Jacques Lacan and the Adventure of Insight: Psychoanalysis in Contemporary Culture., (Cambridge, MA, 1987)Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, ‘To open the question’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, ‘Turning the screw of interpretation’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 94–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, La Folie et la chose littéraire (Paris, 1978)Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, ‘On reading poetry: reflections on the limits and possibilities of psychoanalytic approaches’, in Psychiatry and the Humanities vol. 4: ‘The literary Freud: mechanisms of defense and the poetic will’, ed. Smith, Joseph H. (New Haven, 1980), pp. 119–43.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, Le Scandale du corps parlant: Don Juan avec Austin ou La seduction en deux langues (Paris, 1980); The Literary Speech Act; Don Juan with J. L. Austin, or Seduction in Two Languages, trans. Porter, Catherine (Ithaca, 1983).Google Scholar
Fetterley, Judith, The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction (Bloomington, 1978).Google Scholar
Fetterley, Judith, ‘Reading about reading: “A Jury of Her Peers”, “The Murders in the Rue Morgue”, and “The Yellow Wallpaper'”, in Flynn, Elizabeth A. and Schweickart, Patrocinio P. (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986), pp. 147–64.Google Scholar
Fieguth, Rolf, ‘Rezeption contra falsches und richtiges Lesen? Oder Missverstä-nisse mit Ingarden’, Sprache im technischen Zeitalter, 37 (1971)142–59.Google Scholar
Fine, Arthur, ‘And not anti-realism either’, Noûs, 18 (1984), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer-Lichte, Erika, Bedeutung. Probleme einer semiotischen Hermeneutik und Asthetik (Munich, 1979).Google Scholar
Fischer–Lichte, Erika, Bedeutung: Probleme einer semiotischen Hermeneutik und ästhetik (Munich, 1970).Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley, ‘With the compliments of the author: reflections on Austin and Derrida’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982), 693–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Durham, NC, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, ‘Why no one's afraid of Wolfgang Iser’, Diacritics 11, no. 1 (1981), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA, 1980).Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley, ‘With the compliments of the author: reflections on Austin and Derrida’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982), 693–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost (New York, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, Self-Consuming Artifacts: The Experience of Seventeenth-Century Literature (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1972).Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley, Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA, 1980).Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley, *‘Why no one's afraid of Wolfgang Iser,’ Diacritics, 11 (Spring, 1981), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, *‘With the compliments of the author: reflections on Austin and Derrida’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982), 693–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, *‘Working on the chain gang: interpretation in the law and in literary criticism’, Critical Inquiry, 9 (1982), 201–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, *‘Profession despise thyself: fear and self-loathing in literary studies’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983), 349–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, ‘Fear of Fish: a reply to Walter Davis’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1984), 695–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, *‘Anti-professionalism’, New Literary History, 17 (1985), 89–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, *‘Pragmatism and literary theory I: consequences’, Critical Inquiry, 11 (1985), 433–ndash;58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, ‘No bias, no merit: the case against blind submission’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 103 (1988), 739–48.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley, Doing What Come Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Durham, NC, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaker, Aleksandar, ‘Der russische Formalismus – Theorie und Wirkung’, in Žmegač, and Škreb, (eds.), Zur Kritik115–36.
Flanigan, Beverly Olson, ‘Donne's “Holy Sonnet VII” as speech act’, Language and Style, 19 (1986), 49–57.Google Scholar
Flower MacCannell, Juliet, ‘Oedipus Wrecks: Lacan, Stendhal, and the narrative form of the real’, Modern Language Notes, 98 (1983), 910–40.Google Scholar
Flower MacCannell, Juliet, Figuring Lacan (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Flynn, Elizabethand, A.Schweickart, Patrocinio P. (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986).Google Scholar
Fokkema, D. W., and Kunne-Ibsch, Elrud, Theories of Literature in the Twentieth Century (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Fokkema, D. W., and Kunne-Ibsch, Elrud, ‘The reception of literature: theory and practice of “Rezeptionsästhetik”’, in Theories of Literature in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1977), pp. 136–64.Google Scholar
Foley, Barbara, Telling the Truth: The Theory and Practice of Documentary Fiction (Ithaca, 1986).Google Scholar
Fontaine, Jacqueline, Le Cercle linguistique de Prague (Tours, 1974).Google Scholar
Forget, Philippe (ed.), Text und Interpretation (Munich, 1984).Google Scholar
Forrester, John, Language and the Origins of Psychoanalysis (New York, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrester, John, The seductions of psychoanalysis: Freud, Lacan … Derrida, (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
Forrester, John, ‘Psychoanalysis or literature?’, French Studies, 35 (1981), 170–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, , Les mots et les choses (Paris, 1966); The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans. Sheridan-Smith, Alan (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Fragments d'un discours amoureux (1977); A Lover's Discourse: Fragments, trans. Howard, Richard (New York, 1978).Google Scholar
Francastel, Pierre, ‘Seeing … decoding’, Afterimage, 5 (1974), 4–21.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred, What Is Neostructuralism?, trans. Wilke, Sabine and Gray, Richard (Minneapolis, 1989).Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred, Das individuelle Allgemeine: Textstrukturierung und–interpretation nach Schleiermacher (Frankfurt, 1977).Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred, ‘Die Grenzen der Beherrschbarkeit der Sprache’, in Forget, Philippe (ed.), Text und Interpretation: Deutsch-franzüsische Debatte (Munich, 1984), pp. 181–213.Google Scholar
Freund, Elizabeth, The Return of the Reader: Reader-Response Criticism (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Freundlieb, Dieter, Zur Wissenschaftstheorie der Literaturwissenschaft: Eine Kritik der transzendentalen Hermeneutik (Munich, 1978).Google Scholar
Freundlieb, Dieter, ‘Identification, interpretation, and explanation: some problems in the philosophy of literary studies’, Poetics, 9 (1980), 423–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Norman, ‘Point of view in fiction: the development of a critical concept’, PMLA, 70 (1955), 1, 160–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, Thomas, ‘Critical relation: Peter Szondi's studies on Celan’, Boundary 2, 11 (1983), 139–67.
Frow, John, ‘Reading as system and as practice’, Comparative Criticism, 5 (1983), 87–105.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Ernst, Hermeneutik, 4th edn (Tübingen, 1970).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, Kleine Schriften, (Tübingen, 1967–1977)Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, 1: Philosophie und Hermeneutik (1967).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, 2: Interpretationen (1969).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, 3: Idee und Sprache: Plato, Husserl, Heidegger (1972).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, 4: Variationen (1977).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg,, Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, 4th edn. (Tü bingen, 1972); Truth and Method, trans. Barden, Garrett and Cumming, John (New York, 1975); rev. by Weinsheimer, Joel and Mars, Donald G. (1989).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. Linge, David E. (Berkeley, 1976).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, Rhetorik und Hermeneutik (Göttingen, 1976).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, ‘Philosophie und Literature’, in Orth, E. W. (ed.), Was ist Literatur? (Freiburg, 1981), pp. 18–45.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, ‘The eminent text and its truth’, in Hernadi, Paul (ed.), The Horizon of Literature (Lincoln, NE, 1982), pp. 337–67.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, Gesammelte Werke (Tübingen, 1985–)Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, On Education, Poetry and History: Applied Hermeneutics, ed. Misgeld, Dieter and Nicolson, Graeme, trans. Schmidt, Lawrence and Reuss, Monica (Albany, 1992).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, Hermeneutik, ästhetic, praktische Philosophie: Hans–Georg Gadamer im Gesprdch (Hei delberg, 1993).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans–Georg, and Gottfried, Boehm (eds.), Seminar: Die Hermeneutik und die Wissenschaften (Frankfurt, 1978).Google Scholar
Gadet, Françhise, Saussure and Contemporary Culture, trans. Elliott, Gregory (London, 1989).Google Scholar
Gagey, J., Gaston Bachelard ou la conversion à Vimaginaire (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Galan, F. W., Historic Structures (Austin, 1984).Google Scholar
Galan, F. W., Historic Structures: The Prague School Project, 1928–1946 (Austin, 1985).Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M., ‘The fictive use of language,’ Philosophy, no. 46 (1971), 324-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallop, Jane, Feminism and Psychoanalysis: The Daughter's Seduction (London, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallop, Jane, ‘Lacan and Literature: a case for transference’, Poetics 13 (1984), 301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvin, Paul L. (ed. and trans.), A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and Style (Washington, 1964).Google Scholar
Garvin, Paul L., ‘Karl Bühler's contribution to the theory of linguistics’, The Journal of General Psychology, 75, (1966), 212–15.Google Scholar
Garvin, Paul ‘Rôle des linguistes de l'Ecole de Prague dans le développment de la norme linguistique tchèque’ in Bérard, Edith and Maurais, Jacques (eds.), La norme linguistique (Québec, 1983), 143–52.Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe, The Tain of the Mirror: Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection (Cambridge, MA, 1986).Google Scholar
Gaudin, Colette, ‘LTmagination et la rêverie: remarques sur la poétique de Gaston Bachelard’, Symposium, 20 (1966)), 207–25.Google Scholar
Geiger, Moritz, Die Bedeutung der Kunst: Zugänge zu einer materialen Wertästhetik, ed. Berger, Klaus and Henckmann, Wolfhart (Munich, 1976). (Collection of published and unpublished writings on aesthetics.)
Geiger, Moritz, ‘Beiträge zur Phänomenologie des ästhetischen Genusses’, Jahrbuch für Philosophic und phänomenologische Forschung, 1 (1913), 567–684.Google Scholar
Genette, Gerard, ‘La Rhétorique restreinte’, in Figures III (Paris, 1972), pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard, ‘Frontières du recit’, Communications, 8 (1966), 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gérard, ‘Vraisemblance et motivation’, Communications, 11 (1968), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gérard, ‘Discourse du récit’, in his Figures III (Paris, 1972), pp. 65–282.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard, Nouveau discours du récit (Paris, 1983).Google Scholar
Genette, G., Seuils (1987).Google Scholar
Genot, Gérard, Elements of Narrativics: Grammar in Narrative, Narrative in Grammar (Hamburg, 1979).Google Scholar
Genot, Gérard, Grammaire et récit (Paris, 1984).Google Scholar
Genre, A symposium on Hirsch's, E. D.Validity in Interpretation, 1, no. 3 (1968).
Gerhart, Mary, The Question of Belief in Literary Criticism: An Introduction to the Hermeneutic Theory of Paul Ricoeur (Stuttgart, 1979).Google Scholar
Gibson, Walker, ‘Authors, speakers, readers, and mock readers’, College English 11 (1950); rpt. in Tompkins, Jane (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980), pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilli, Yves, ‘Les rapports texte-histoire et I'esthétique de la réception en RFA’, La Pensée, no. 233 (1983), 117–25.Google Scholar
Gilli, Yves, ‘Texte, lecture de texte et critique de “l'esthétique de la réception en RDA’, La Pensée, no. 240 (1984), 119–23.Google Scholar
Ginestier, Paul, La Pensée de Bachelard (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Glenn, Christine G., ‘The role of episodic structure and story length in children's recall of simple stories’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17 (1978), 229–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glowiński, Michal, ‘On concretization’, in Odmark, (ed.), Language.
Godel, Robert, Les sources manuscrites du Cours de linguistique générale de F. de Saussure (Geneva and Paris, 1957).Google Scholar
Godel, Robert, ‘F. de Saussure's theory oflanguage’, in Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 3, Theoretical Foundations, ed. Sebeok, Thomas A. (The Hague, 1966), pp. 479–93.Google Scholar
Godzich, Wlad, ‘The domestication of Derrida’, in Arac, Jonathan, Godzich, Wlad, Martin, Wallace (eds.), The Yale Critics: Deconstruction in America (Minneapolis, 1983), pp.20–40.Google Scholar
Goux, Jean–Joseph, ‘Marx et l'inscription du travail’, in Tel Quel: Théorie d'ensemble (Paris, 1968), pp. 188–211.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald, Literature Against Itself (Chicago, 1979).Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald, Professing Literature: An Institutional History (Chicago, 1987).Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald, Literature Against Itself: Literary Ideas in Modern Society (Chicago, 1979).Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald, ‘Narrative and the unofficial interpretive culture’, in Phelan, James (ed.), Reading Narrative: Form, Ethics, Ideology (Columbus, OH, 1989), pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald, ‘Culture and anarchy’, review of Is There a Text in this Class? by Fish, Stanley, New Republic, 184 (14 February, 1981), pp. 36–8.Google Scholar
Gras, Vernon, intro., ‘A symposium: hermeneutics, post-structuralism, and “objective interpretation'” Papers on Language and Literature, 17 (1981), 48–87.Google Scholar
Gras, Vernon W., European Literary Theory and Practice: From Existential Phenomenology o Structuralism (New York, 1973).Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J., Sémantique structurale. Recherche de méthode (Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J., Du sens: essais sémiotiques (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J., ‘Narrative grammars: units and levels’, MLN, 86 (1971), 793–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greimas, A. J., Maupassant: la sémiotique du texte, exercices pratiques (Paris, 1976).Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J., Du sens II: essais sémiotiques (Paris, 1983).Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J. and Joseph Courtés, ‘The cognitive dimension of narrative discourse’, New Literary History, 7 (1976), 433–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greimas, A. J. and Courtés, Joseph, Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonne de la science du langage (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J. ‘Roland Barthes: une biographie à construire’, Bulletin du Groupe derecherches sémio-linguistiques, 13(1980).Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie, ‘Life, death, and language: some thoughts on Wittgenstein and Derrida’, in her Philosophy in and out of Europe (Berkeley, 1976), pp. 142–54.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul, ‘Utterer's meaning, sentence-meaning, and word meaning’, Foundations of Language, 4 (1968), 225–42.Google Scholar
Grice, H. ‘Utterer's meaning and intentions’, Philosophical Review, 78 (1969), 147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Volume III: Speech Acts (New York, 1975), pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Grimm, Gunter, Rezeptionsgeschichte: Grundlegung einer Theorie, (Munich, 1977), 144–86.Google Scholar
Grimm, Gunter, ‘Rezeptionsgeschichte: Prämissen und Möglichkeiten historischer Darstellung,’ Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur, 2 (1977).Google Scholar
Grimm, Gunter (ed.), Literatur und Leser: Theorien und Modelle zur Rezeption literarischer Werke (Stuttgart, 1975).Google Scholar
Grob, Karl, ‘Theory and practice of philology: reflections on the public statements of Peter Szondi’, Boundary 2, 11 (1983), 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, Reinhardt, Phenomenology and Existentialism: An Introduction (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Grygar, Mojmír, ‘Semantische Mehrdeutigkeit des dichterischen Textes. Zur strukturellen Analyse der Dichtung “Mai” von K. H. Mácha’, Tijdschrift voor slavische taal- en letterkunde, 1 (1972), 30–50.Google Scholar
Grygar, Mojmír, ‘The role of personality in literary development’, in Steiner, , Červenka, and Vroon, (eds.), Structure, 187–210.
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich, ‘Deconstruction deconstructed: transformations of French logocentrist criticism in American literary theory’, Philosophische Rund schau, 33 (1986), 1–35.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich, ‘Soziologie und Rezeptionsäk:Ügenstand nd Chancen interdisziplinäsammenarbeit’, in Jiüolb, (ed.), Neue nsichten einer kün Germanistik (Munich, 1973)73), pp. 48–74.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich, ‘Konsequenzen der Rezeptionsä oder Literaturwissenschaft als Kom- unikationssoziologie’, Poetica, 7 (1975), 388–413.Google Scholar
Gunn, Daniel, Psychoanalysis and Fiction (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Günter, Horst, ‘Philological understanding: a note on the writings of Peter Szondi’, Comparative Criticism, 5 (1983), 245–50.Google Scholar
Günther, Hans, Struktur als Prozess (Munich, 1973).Google Scholar
Günther, Hans, (ed.), Zeichen und Funktion. Beiträge zur ästhetischen Konzeption Jan Mukařovskýs (Munich, 1986).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jiirgen, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. Lawrence, Frederick (Cambridge, MA, 1987), pp. 185–210 [the section called ‘Excursus on leveling the genre distinction between philosophy and literature’].Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften: Materialien (Frankfurt, 1970).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen,, ‘Die Universalitätsanspruch der Hermeneutik’, in Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik (Frankfurt, 1971), pp. 120–59.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, ‘A review of Gadamer's Truth and Method”, in Understanding and Social Inquiry, ed. Dallmayr, Fred R. and McCarthy, Thomas A. (Notre Dame, 1977), pp. 335–63.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, ‘The hermeneutic claim to universality’, in Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique, ed. Bleicher, Josef (London, 1970), pp. 181–211.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, ‘Culture, the media and the “ideology effect”’, in Curran, J., Gurevitch, M. and Woollacott, J. (eds.), Mass Communication and Society (London, 1977)Google Scholar
Halle, Morris and Keyser, Samuel Jay, ‘Chaucer and the study of prosody’, College English, 28 (1966), 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K, Explorations in the Functions of Language (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (London, 1978).Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, ‘Linguistic function and literary style: an inquiry into the language of William Golding's “The Inheritors'”, in Chatman, (ed.), Literary Style, pp. 330–68.
Hamon, Philippe, Introduction à l’analyse du descriptif (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
Hamon, Philippe, Le personnel du roman (Geneva, 1983).Google Scholar
Hamon, H. and Rotman, P., Les intellocrates (1981).Google Scholar
Hamon, P., ‘Pour un statut sémiologique du personnage’, in Poe´tique du recit (1977)Google Scholar
Hancher, Michael, ‘Three kinds of intention’, Modern Language Notes, 87 (1972), 827–51.Google Scholar
Hancher, Michael, ‘Understanding poetic speech acts’, College English, 36 (1975), 632–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancher, Michael, ‘Beyond a speech-act theory of literary discourse’, Modern Language Notes, 92 (1977), 1081–98.Google Scholar
Hansen-Löve, Aage, Der russische Formalismus: Methodologische Rekonstruktion seiner Entwicklung aus dem Prinzip der Verfremdung (Vienna, 1978).Google Scholar
Harris, Roy, Reading Saussure: A Critical Commentary on the ‘Cours de linguistique générale” (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Harris, Roy, Language, Saussure and Wittgenstein: How to Play Games with Words (London, 1988).Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey, Saving the Text: Literature/Derrida/Philosophy (Baltimore, 1981).Google Scholar
Hartmann, Geoffrey (ed.), Psychoanalysis and the Question of the Text (Baltimore, 1979)Google Scholar
Hartmann, Geoffrey, ‘The fulness and nothingness of literature’, Yale French Studies, 16 (1955), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauff, Jürgen, ‘Hermeneutik’, in žmegač, Viktor (ed.), Methoden–diskussion: Arbeits– buch zur Literaturwissenschaft, vol. 2 (Frankfurt, 1972), pp. 1–81.Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav, ‘Funkce spisovného jazyka’ [Functions of standard language] (1929), Studie, 11–18.Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav, ‘Úkoly spisovného jazyka a jeho kultura’ [The tasks of standard language and its culture] (1932), Studie,30–59; Eng. trans, in Garvin, (ed.), Reader,; rpt. in Vachek, and Dušková, (eds.), Praguiana, 143–64.Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav, ‘K funkčnímu rozvrstvení spisovného jazyka’ [On functional differentiation of standard language] (1942), Studie, 60–8.Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav, Studie o spisovném jazyce [Studies on standard language] (Prague, 1963).Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, ‘A grid-based theory of English meter’, Linguistic Inquiry, 14 (1983), 357–93.Google Scholar
Hays, Michael, ‘The criticism of Peter Szondi’, Boundary 2, 11 (1983), 1–5.Google Scholar
Heath, Stephen, ‘Film and system’, Screen, 16 (1975), 7–77, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S., Vertige du déplacement. (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
Heath, Stephen, The Nouveau Roman (London, 1972).Google Scholar
Heath, Stephen, ‘Difference’, Screen, 19, no. 3 (1978), 51–183.Google Scholar
Heath, Stephen, Questions of Cinema (London, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, ‘Letter on humanism’, in Krell, David F. (ed.), Basic Writings of Heidegger (New York and London, 1977), pp. 193–242.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, ‘The end of philosophy and the task of thinking’, in Basic Writings, pp. 369–92.
Heidegger, Martin, ‘The word of Nietzsche: “God is Dead”’, in Lovitt, William (trans.), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (New York, 1977), pp. 51–112.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Nietzsche IV, ed. Krell, David F., trans. Capuzzi, Frank A. (San Francisco, 1982).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Sein und Zeit (Frankfurt, 1927); Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung (Frankfurt, 1944; 4th expanded edn 1971)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Holzwege (Frankfurt, 1950).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Unterwegs zur Sprache (Pfullingen, 1959); On the Way to Language, trans. Hertz, Peter D. (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Der Ursprung des Kunstwerks (Stuttgart, 1960).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Hofstadter, Albert (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt, 1976–).Google Scholar
Hénault, Anne, Narratologie, sémiotique générate: les enjeux de la semiotique, 2 (Paris, 1983).Google Scholar
Hénault, Anne, Les enjeux de la sémiotique (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar
Hendricks, William O., Essays on Semiolinguistics and Verbal Art (The Hague, 1973).Google Scholar
Henrichs, Norbert, Bibliographic der Hermeneutik und ihre Anwendungsbereiche seit Schleiermacher (Düsseldorf, 1968).Google Scholar
Pitte, M. M., ‘Hermeneutics and the “crisis” of literature’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 24 (1984), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernadi, Paul, ‘Entertaining commitments: a reception theory of literary genres’, Poetics, 10 (1981), 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernadi, Paul, ‘Literary theory: a compass for critics’, Critical Inquiry, 3 (1976), 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernadi, Paul, ‘Doing, making, meaning: toward a theory of verbal practice’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 103 (1988), 749–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillenaar, H., Roland Barthes: Existentialisme, Semiotiek, Psychoanalyse (Assen, 1982).Google Scholar
Hirsch, E.D., Aims of Interpretation (Chicago, 1976).Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr., Validity in Interpretation (New Haven, 1967).Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr., The Aims of Interpretation (Chicago, 1978).Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr., ‘What's the use of speech-act theory?’, Centrum, 3 (1975), 121–4.Google Scholar
Hirsch, David H., ‘Penelope's web’, Sewanee Review, 90 (January 1982), 119–31.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul, ‘Althusser and the theory of ideology’, Economy and Society, 4 (1976), 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis, Omkring sprogteoriens grundlaeggelse (Copenhagen, 1943); Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, trans. Whitfield, Francis J. (Baltimore, 1953).Google Scholar
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe (ed.), Sozialgeschichte und Wirkungsäk: Dokumente zur mpirischen und marxistischen Rezeptionsforschung (Frankfurt, 1974).Google Scholar
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe, The Institution of Criticism (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
Hohendahl, Peter ‘Beyond reception aesthetics’, New German Critique, 28 (1983), 108–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdcroft, David, Saussure: Signs, System, and Arbitrariness (Cambridge, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holenstein, Elmar, Roman Jakob son's Approach to Language. Phenomenological Structuralism (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar
Holenstein, Elmar, ‘On the poetry and the plurifunctionality of language’, in Smith, (ed.), Structure and Gestalt, 1–43.
Holenstein, Elmar, Jakobson ou le structuralism phénoménologique (Paris, 1974); Roman Jakobson's Approach to Language: Phenomenological Structuralism, trans. Catherine, and Schelbert, Tarcisius (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar
Holenstein, Elmar, ‘The structure of understanding: structuralism versus hermeneutics’, Poetics and the Theory of Literature, 1 (1976), 223–38.Google Scholar
Holland, Norman N., The Dynamics of Literary Response (New York, 1968).Google Scholar
Holland, Norman5 Readers Reading (New Haven, 1975).Google Scholar
Holland, NormanPoems in Persons: An Introduction to the Psychoanalysis of Literature (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
Holland, Norman ‘Unity Identity Text Self’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 90 (1975), 813–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Norman ‘Recovering “The Purloined Letter”: reading as a personal transaction’, in Suleiman, Susan R. and Wimmers, Inge Crosman (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 350–70.Google Scholar
Holland, Norman ‘Why Ellen laughed’, Critical Inquiry, 7 (1980), 345–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, NormanLaughing (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
Holland, NormanThe I (New Haven, 1985).Google Scholar
Holland, Norman ‘The miller's wife and the professors: questions about the transactive theory of reading’, New Literary History, 17 (1986), 423–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollinger, Robert (ed.), Hermeneutics and Praxis (Notre Dame, 1985).Google Scholar
Holly, Michael Ann, Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History (Ithaca,1984)Google Scholar
Holub, Robert C., ‘Reception theory and Russian Formalism’, Germano-Slavica, 3 (1980), 272–86.Google Scholar
Holub, Robert ‘The American reception of reception theory’, German Quarterly, 55 (1982), 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holub, RobertReception Theory: A Critical Introduction, (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Holub, Robert ‘American confrontations with reception theory’, Monatshefte 81 (1989), 213–25.Google Scholar
Horálek, Karel, ‘Les fonctions de la langue et de la parole’, in Travaux linguistiques de Prague, I (Prague, 1964),41–6.Google Scholar
Howard, Roy J., Three Faces of Hermeneutics: An Introduction to Current Theories of Understanding (Berkley, 1982).Google Scholar
Hoy, David Gouzens, The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar
Hrushovski, Benjamin, ‘Poetics, criticism, science’, PTL – A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, (1976).Google Scholar
Hufnagel, Erwin, Einfuhrung in die Hermeneutik (Stuttgart, 1976).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Logische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. (Halle, 1900 and 1901); Logical Investigations, trans Findlay, F. J., 2 vols. (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie undphänomenologischen Philosophic (Halle, 1913); Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. Gibson, W. R. Boyce (New York, 1931).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Cartesianische Meditationen: Eine Einleitung in die Phänomenologie (The Hague, 1950); Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. Cairns, Dorion (The Hague, 1960).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phanomenologie (Bel grade, 1936); The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. Carr, David (Evanston, 1970).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Husserliana: Gesammelte Werke ed. Breda, H. L. (The Hague, 1950–). Collected Works (1980–).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, The Idea of Phenomenology, trans. Alston, William P. and Nakhnikian, George (The Hague, 1964).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Shorter Works (Brighton, 1981).Google Scholar
Hyppolite, Jean, Sens et existence dans la philosophic de Maurice Merleau-Ponty (Oxford, 1963).Google Scholar
Ibsch, Elrud, ‘Leserrollen, Bedeutungstypen und literarische Kommunikation’, Amsterdarner Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik, 15 (1982), 335–49.Google Scholar
Ibsch, Elrud, ‘On the empirical validation of hypotheses concerning reception aesthetics’, Neohelicon, 13 (1986), 235–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibsch, Elrud, ‘Reception aesthetics versus empirical research of reader's response’, Cahiers Roumains d'Etudes Littéraires, 3 (1986), 38–48.Google Scholar
Ihwe, Jens, Linguistik in der Literaturwissenschaft (Munich, 1972).Google Scholar
Image-Music-Text. Essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath (London, 1977)
Ingarden, Roman, Das literarische Kunstwerk (Tübingen, 1930); The Literary Work of Art, trans. Grabowicz, George G. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman, Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks (Tübingen, 1968); The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, trans. Crowly, Ruth Ann and Olson, Kenneth R. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman, Selected Papers in Aesthetics (Washington, 1985).Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman, The Work of Music and the Problem of Its Identity, trans. Czerniawski, Adam (Berkeley, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingen, Ferdinand, ‘Die Revoke des Lesers order Rezeption versus Interpretation: Zu Fragen der Interpretation und der Rezeptionsästhetik’, Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik, 3 (1974) 83–147.Google Scholar
Man, Paul, ‘Introduction’ to Jauss, Robert, Toward an Aesthetic of Reception (Brighton, 1982).Google Scholar
,Introduction: varieties of audience-oriented criticism’, in Suleiman, Susan R. and Crosman, Inge (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 3–45.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, Die Appellstruktur der Texte: Unbestimmtheit als Wirkungsbedingung iterarischer Prose (Constance, 1970); ‘Indeterminacy and the reader's response n prose fiction’, in Miller, J. Hillis (ed.), Aspects of Narrative: Selected Papers from he English Institute (New York, 1971)), pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, Der implizite Lesser: Kommunkationsformen der Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett (Munich, 1972); Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to eckett (Baltimore, 1974).Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘The reading process: a phenomenological approach’, in Cohn, Ralph (ed.), New Directions in Literary History (Baltimore, 1974)), pp. 125–45.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘The reality of fiction: a functionalist approach to literature’, New History, (1975), 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘In defense of authors and readers: for the reader’, Novel, 11 (1977), 19–25.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, Der Akt des Le sens: Theorie äscher Wirkung (Munich, 1976); The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (Baltimore, 1978).Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘Narrative strategies as a means of communication’, in Valdes, Mario J. and Miller, Owen J. (eds.), Interpretation of Narrative (Toronto, 1978), pp. 100–17.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘The current situation of literary theory: key concepts and the imaginary’, New iterary History, 11 (1979), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘The indeterminacy of the text: a critical reply’, Comparative Criticism, 2 (1980), 174–89.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘Interaction between text and reader’, in Suleiman, Susan R. and Crosman, Inge eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 106–19.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘Interview’, Diacritics, 10 (1980), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘Texts and readers’, Discourse Processes, 3 (1980), 327–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘Talk like whales: a reply to Stanley Fish’, Diacritics, 11 (1981), 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘The interplay between creation and interpretation’, New Literary History, 15 1983/1984), 387–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘Changing functions of literature’, REAL: The Yearbook of Research in English nd American Studies, 3 (1985), 1–21 and in London Germanic Studies, 3 1986), 162–79.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘Feigning in fiction’, in Miller, Mario J. Valdéen J. (eds.), Identity of he Literary Text (Toronto, 1985). 204–28.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, Prospecting: From Reader Response to Literary Anthropology (Baltimore, 1989).Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, Der Akt des Lesens: Theories asthetischer Wirkung (Munich, 1976); The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (Baltimore, 1978).Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘Talking like whales: a reply to Stanley Fish’, Diacritics, 11 (1981), 82–7.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. V., ‘Growth of the theoretical framework of modern poetics’, in Sebeok, (ed.), Trends, XII, 835–61.
Jacobus, Mary, Reading Woman: Essays in Feminist Criticism (New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Novejsaja russkaja poezija: Nabrosok pervyj (Prague, 1921).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, O češcaron;skom stiche preimuscestvenno v sopostavlenii s russkim (Berlin, 1923).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman.Über den tschechischen Vers. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des russischen Verses (= Postilla Bohemica 8–10, 1974).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman.Language in Literature, ed. Pomorska, K. and Rudy, S. (Cambridge, MA, 1987).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Co je poesie?’ [What is poetry?] (1934); Eng. trans, in Language, 369–78.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Staročeský verš’ [Old Czech verse] (1934); Eng. trans, in Selected Writings (SW), VI, 417–65.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Randbemerkungen zur Prosa des Dichters Pasternak’ (1935); Eng. trans, in Language, 301–17.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Die Arbeit der sogenannten “Prager Schule'” (1936), SW, II, 547–50.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Socha v symbolice Puškinově’ [The statue in Pushkin's poetic mythology] (1937); Eng. trans, in Language, 318–67.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘On linguistic aspects of translation’, in Brower, R. A. (ed.), On Translation (Cambridge, MA, 1959), 232–39, SW, II, 260–6.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Linguistics and poetics’, in Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in Language (New York, 1960), 350–77, SW, III, 18–51.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Linguistics and communication theory’, in Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects (Providence, RI, 1961), 245–52, SW, II, 272–9.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Zeichen und System der Sprache’ (1962), SW, II.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Language in operation’, in L'Aventure de l'esprit. Mélanges Alexandre Koyré (Paris, 1964), II, 269–81, SW, III, 7–17.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘On the relation between visual and auditory signs’, in Proceedings of the AFCRL Symposium on Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form (Boston, 1967), SW, II, 338–44.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, The Framework of Language (Ann Arbor, MI, 1980).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Questions de poétique (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Language in Literature (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Selected Writings (SW), 8 vols. (The Hague, 1966–1988).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Pomorska, Krystyna, Dialogues (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Efforts towards a means-ends model of language in European linguistics of the inter-war period’, in Mohrmann, Gh., Norman, F. and Sommerfelt, A. (eds.), Trends in Modern Linguistics (Utrecht-Antwerp, 1963), pp. 104–8.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (ed.), N. S. Trubeckofs Letters and Notes (The Hague, 1975).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Selected Writings(SW) (The Hague–Paris–Berlin, 1962–). (vols. 3, 6–8 ed. Rudy, Stephen; vol. 5 prepared by Stephen Rudy and Martha Taylor.)Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb’, SW, II, pp. 130–47.
Jakobson, Roman, ‘La théorie saussurienne en rétrospection’, SW, VIII, pp. 391–435.
Jakobson, Roman, Six leçons sur le son et le sens (Paris, 1976); Six Lectures on Sound and Meaning, trans. Mepham, John (Hassocks, Sussex, 1978).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, The Framework of Language (Michigan Studies in the Humanities no. 1) (Ann Arbor, 1980).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time, ed. Pomorska, Krystyna and Rudy, Stephen (Minneapolis, 1985).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Language in Literature, ed. Pomorska, Krystyna and Rudy, Stephen (Cambridge, MA, 1987).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Halle, Morris, Fundamentals of Language (1956; rev. edn, The Hague, 1971).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Pomorska, Krystyna, Dialogues (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Waugh, Linda R., The Sound Shape of Language (Brighton, 1979).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Closing statement: linguistics and poetics’, in Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in Language (New York, 1960), pp. 350–77.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances’, in Jakobson, Roman and Halle, Morris, Fundamentals of Language (The Hague, 1956), pp. 53–82.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbance’ (1956), reprinted in Jakobson: Studies in Child Language and Aphasia, Janua Linguarum, (The Hague, 1971), pp. 49–74.Google Scholar
Jakubinsky, Lev, ‘O zvukach stichotvornogo jazyka’, in Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka, I (Petersburg, 1916).Google Scholar
Jakubinsky, Lev, ‘Skoplenie odinakovych plavnych v prakticeskom i poeticeskom jazykach’, ibid., II (Petersburg, 1917).Google Scholar
Jakubinsky, Lev, ‘O poeticeskom glossemosočetanii’, in Poetika: Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka (Petersburg, 1919).Google Scholar
James, Henry, The House of Fiction: Essays on the Novel, ed. Edel, Leon (Westport, 1973).Google Scholar
James, Henry, Theory of Fiction: Henry James, ed. Miller, James E. Jr. (Lincoln, NE, 1972).Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism (Princeton, 1974).Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism (Princeton, 1972).Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca, 1981).Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, ‘Imaginary and Symbolic in Lacan: Marxism, psychoanalytic criticism and the problem of the subject’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 338–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (London, 1981).Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, ‘Religion and ideology: a political reading of Paradise Lost’, in Barker, F. et al. (eds.), Literature, Politics and Theory (London, 1986), pp. 35–56.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, The Political Unconscious: Narratives as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca, 1981).Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, ‘Foreword’, in Lyotard, Jean-Francois, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, Geoff and Massumi, Brian [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 10] (Minneapolis, 1984), pp. vii–xxi.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, The Ideologies of Theory, Essays 1971–1986: Volume I: Situations of Theory [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 48] (Minneapolis, 1988).Google Scholar
Jankovič, Milan, ‘Perspectives of semantic gesture’, Poetics, 4 (1972), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japp, Uwe, Hermeneutik: Der theoretische Diskurs, die Literatur und die Konstruktion ihres Zusammenhanges in den philologischen Wissenschaften (Munich, 1977).Google Scholar
Japp, Uwe, ‘Hermeneutik’, in Brackert, Helmut and Stückrath, Jörn (eds.), Literaturwissen– schaft: Grundkurs 2 (Reinbeck, 1981), pp. 451–63.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert, Literaturgeschichte als Provokation, 2nd edn (Frankfurt-on-Main, 1970), Eng. trans. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception (Brighton, 1982).Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert, ‘Limits and tasks of literary hermeneutics’, Diogenes, 109 (1980), 92–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert, ‘Zur Abgrenzung und Bestimmung einer literarischen Hermeneutik’, in Fuhrmann, Manfred et al. (ed.), Text und Applikation: Theologie, Jurisprudenz und Literatur– wissenschaft (Munich, 1981), pp. 551–60.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert, ‘Paradigmawè der Literaturwissenschaft’, Linguistische erichte, 3 (1969), 44–56.Google Scholar
Jauss, HansLiteraturgeschichte als Provokation (Baltimore, 1970).Google Scholar
Jauss, HansKleine Apologie der äscher Erfahrung, Konstanzer Universitän 59, Konstanz, 1972).Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Racines und Goethes Iphigenie: Mit einem Nachwort füe Partialitä ezeptionsäschen Methode’, Neue Hefte fur Philosophic, 4 (1973), 1–46.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Levels of identification of hero and audience’, New Literary History, 5 (1974), 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Der Leser als Instanz einer neuen Geschichte der Literatur’, Poetica, 7 (1975).), 325–44.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘The idealist embarrassment: observations on Marxist aesthetics’, New Literary istory, 7 (1975), 192–208.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Interview’, Diacritics, 5 (1975), 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Zur Fortsetzung des Dialogs zwischen ‘bücher’ und ‘materialistischer’ ezeptionsäk’, in Warning, Rainer (ed.), Rezeptionsäk: Theorie und raxis (Munich, 1975), pp. 343–52.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘La douceur du foyer –des Jahres 1857 als Muster der Vermittlung sozialer Normen’, in Warning, Rainer (ed.), Rezeptionsäk: Theorie und Praxis Munich, 1975), pp. 401–34.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Goethes und Valéust: Zur Hemeneutik von Frage und Antwort’, omparative Literature, 28 (1976), 201–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Theses on the transition from the aesthetics of literary works to a theory f aesthetic experience’, in Miller, Mario J. Valdéen J. (eds.), nterpretation of Narrative (Toronto, 1978)pp. 137–47.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘La jouissance esthéPoé’ 9 (1979), 261–74.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Rezeptionsäk und literarische Kommunikation’, in Sund, H. and immermann, M. (eds.), Auf dem Weg gebracht–d Wirklichkeit der Griü er Universitätanz (Konstanz 1979), pp. 387–97Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Sur l'expéesthégénéral et littéraire en particulier: Entre- tien avec Charles Grivel’, Revue des science humaines, 49, no. 177 (1980), 7–21.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Die Mythe vom Siündenfall (Gen. 3): Interpretation im Lichte der literarischen Hermeneutik’, in Fuhrmann, Manfred, Jaufi, Hans Robert, and Pannenberg, Wolfhart (eds.), Text und Applikation (Munich, 1980), pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Zur Abgrenzung und Bestimmung einer literarischen Hermeneutik’, in Text und Applikation (Munich, 1981), pp. 459–82.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Das fragende Adam: Zur Funktion von Frage und Antwort in literarischen Tradition’, in Text und Applikation (Munich 1981), pp. 551–60.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Job's questions and their distant reply: Goethe, Nietzsche, Heidegger’, Com parative Literature, 34 (1982), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, HansÄsthetische Erfahrung und literarische Hermeneutik (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Der Gebrauch der Fiktion in Formen der Anschauung und Darstellung der Geschichte’, in Koselleck, Reinhart, Lutz, Heinrich, and Rusen, Jorn (eds.), Formen der Geschichtsschreibung (Munich, 1982), pp. 415–51.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Zum Problem des dialogischen Verstehens’, in Lachmann, Renate (ed.), Dialogizität (Munich, 1982), pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Norwid and Baudelaire as contemporaries: a notable case of overdue concreti- zation’, in Steiner, Peter, Červenka, Miroslav, and Vroon, Ronald (eds.), The Structure of the Literary Process: Studies Dedicated to the memory of Felix Vodička (Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, HansAesthetic Experience and Literary Hermeneutics, Theory and History of Literature 3 (Minneapolis, 1982).Google Scholar
Jauss, HansToward an Aesthetic of Reception, Theory and History of Literature 2 (Minneapolis, 1982).Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Poesis’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982), 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Thesen zur Position Baudelaires in der ästhetischen Moderne’, Weimarer Beiträge, 31, no. 1 (1985), 15–23.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘The identity of the poetic text in the changing horizon of understanding’, in Valdés, Mario J. and Miller, Owen J. (eds.) Identity of the Literary Text (Toronto, 1985), pp. 146–74.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans ‘Die Theorie der Rezeption – Riückschau auf ihre unerkannte Vorgeschichte’, Cahiers Roumains d'Etudes Littéraires, 3 (1986), 4–20.Google Scholar
Jauss, HansArt Social und art industriel: Funktionen der Kunst im Zeitalter des Industrialismus (Munich, 1987), 4–20.Google Scholar
Jauss, HansQuestion and Answer: Forms of Dialectical Understanding, ed. and trans. Hays, Michael (Minneapolis, 1989).Google Scholar
Jay, Martin, ‘Should intellectual history take a linguistic turn? Reflections on the Habermas–Gadamer debate’, in LaCapra, Dominick and Kaplan, Steven L. (eds.), Modern Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives (Ithaca, 1982), pp. 86–110.Google Scholar
Jeanrond, Werner G., ‘The impact of Schleiermacher's hermeneutics on contem porary interpretation theory’, in Jasper, David (ed.), The Interpretation of Belief: Coleridge, Schleiermacher and Romanticism (London, 1986), pp. 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Ann, ‘Structuralism and posts tructuralism’, in Jefferson, and Robey, (eds.), Modern Literary Theory, pp. 84–112.
Jefferson, Ann and Robey, David (eds.), Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Johnson, B., ‘The Critical Difference’, in Young, R. (ed.), Untying the Text (Boston and London, 1981), pp. 162–74.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara, The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading (Baltimore, Maryland, 1980).Google Scholar
Johnson, Christopher, System and Writing in the Philosophy of Jacques Derrida (Cambridge, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Barbara, The Critical Difference (Baltimore, 1980).Google Scholar
Johnson, Pauline, Marxist Aesthetics (London, 1984), 25–45.Google Scholar
Johnson, Bruce, True Correspondence: A Phenomenology of Thomas Hardy's Novels (Tallahassee, 1983).Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara, ‘Poetry and performative language: Mallarmé and Austin’, in Barbara, Johnson, The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading (Baltimore, 1980), pp. 52–66.Google Scholar
Jolles, André, Einfache Formen: Legende, Sage, Mythe, Rätsel, Spruch, Kasus, Memorabile, Märchen, Witz (1930; 6th edn, Tubingen, 1982).Google Scholar
Jouve, V., La littérature selon Barthes (1986).Google Scholar
Juhl, Peter, Interpretation: An Essay in the Philosophy of Literary Criticism (Princeton, 1980).Google Scholar
Juri, Striedter, Literary Structure, Evolution, and Value: Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism Reconsidered (Cambridge, MA, 1989).Google Scholar
Jurt, Joseph, ‘"L'Esthétique de la réception": Une Nouvelle Approche de la litterature?’, Les Lettres Romanes, 37, no. 3 (1983), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jüttner, Siegfried, ‘Tm Namen des Lesers: Zur Rezeptionsdebatte in der deutschen Romanistik (1965–1975)’, Germanisch-romanische Monatsschrift, 60, 29 NF (1979), 1–26.Google Scholar
Kaelin, Eugene F., An Existentialist Aesthetic: The Theories of Sartre and Merleau-Ponty (Madison, 1962).Google Scholar
Kalivoda, Robert, ‘Zur Typologie der Funktionen und zum Konzept eines totalen Funktionalismus’, in Gunther, (ed.), Zeichen, pp. 62–95
Kavanagh, James H., ‘Marxism's Althusser: towards a politics of literary theory’, Diacritics, 12, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennard, Jean E., ‘Ourself behind ourself: a theory for lesbian readers’, in Flynn, Elizabeth A. and Schweickart, Patrocinio P. (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986), pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank, An Appetite for Poetry (Cambridge, MA, 1989).Google Scholar
Kimpel, Dieter, ‘Transzendentale-hermeneutische Literaturwissenschaft’, in Kimpel, Dieter and Pinkerneil, Beate (eds.), Methodische Praxis der Literaturwissenschaft (Kronberg/Ts., 1975), pp. 85–115.Google Scholar
Kincaid, James R., ‘Coherent readers, incoherent texts’, Critical Inquiry 3 (1977), 781–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, ‘The rhythmic structure of English verse’, Linguistic Inquiry, 8 (1977), 189–247.Google Scholar
Klein, Jürgen, Beyond Hermeneutics: Zur Philosophic der Literatur– und Geisteswissen– schaften (Essen, 1985).Google Scholar
Kloepfer, Rolf, ‘Escape into reception: the scientist and hermeneutic schools of German literary theory’, Poetics Today, 3, no. 2 (1982), 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, Steven, and Michaels, Walter Benn, ‘Against theory 2: hermeneutics and deconstruction’, Critical Inquiry, 14 (1987), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, Steven and Michaels, Walter Benn, ‘Against theory’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982), 723–42; rpt. in Mitchell, W.J. T. (ed.), Against Theory (Chicago, 1985), pp. 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, D., ‘Roland Barthes: an intertextual figure’, in Worton, M. and Still, J. (eds.), Intertextuality: Theories and Practices (Manchester, 1990).Google Scholar
Kockelmans, Joseph J. (ed.), Phenomenology: The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Its Interpretation (New York, 1967).Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K., Bibliographia Saussureana, 1870–1970 (Metuchen, NJ, 1972).Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K., Ferdinand de Saussure: The Origin and Development of His Linguistic Thought in Western Studies of Language (Braunschweig, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Annette, ‘Dancing through the minefield: some observations on the theory, practice, and politics of a feminist literary criticism,’ Feminist Studies, 6 (1980), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Annette, ‘A map for rereading: or, gender and the interpretation of literary texts,’ New Literary History, 11 (1980), 451–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köngäs-Maranda, Elli and Maranda, Pierre, Structural Models in Folklore and Transformational Essays (The Hague, 1971).Google Scholar
Konstantinovic, Zoran et al., (eds.), Literary Communication and Reception: Proceedings of the IXth Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association (Innsbruck, 1980).Google Scholar
Köpf, Gerhard (ed.), Rezeption spragmatik: Beiträge zur Praxis des Lesens (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
Krauss, Rosalind, ‘Notes on the index’, in Michelson, Annette et al. (eds.), October – The First Decade (London, 1987), pp. 2–15.Google Scholar
Krenzlin, Norbert, Das Werk “rein für sich": Zur Geschichte des Verhältnisses von Phänomenologie, Ästhetik und Literaturwissenschaft (Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar
Kresic, Stephen (ed.), Contemporary Literary Hermeneutics and Interpretation of Classical Texts (Ottawa, 1981).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, La révolution de la langage poétique (Paris, 1974); Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. Waller, Margaret (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, Semiotike: Recherches pour une sémanalyse (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, La Revolution du langage poetique (Paris, 1974); Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. Waller, Margaret, (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, trans. Gora, Thomas et al. (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, ‘The Semiotic Activity’, trans. Heath, Stephen and Prendergast, Christopher, in screen, 14 (1973), 25–39).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, J., Les samouraïs (1990).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, ‘La Sémiologie: science critique ou critique de la science’, in Tel Quel Théorie d'ensemble (Paris, 1968), pp. 80–93; ‘Semiotics: a critical science and/or a critique of science’, trans. Hand, Sean, in Moi, Toril (ed.), The Kristeva Reader, pp. 74–88.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, ‘The system and the speaking subject’ (1973), reprinted in The Kristeva Reader, pp. 24–33.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, La Révolution du langage poeiique (Paris, 1974). Parts of this have been translated by Waller, Margaret as ‘Revolution in poetic language’ in The Kristeva Reader, pp. 89–136.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, ‘Pratique signifiante et mode de production’, in La Traversée des signes (Paris, 1975), pp. 11–30; ‘Signifying practice and mode of production’, trans. Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey, Edinburgh ‘76 Magazine, 1 (1976), 64–75.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, ed. Roudiez, Leon (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
Krueger, Roberta, ‘Reading the Yvain/Charrette: Chretien's inscribed audiences at Noauz and Pesme Aventure’, Forum for Modern Language Studies, 19, no. 2 (1983), 172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krutch, J. W., Edgar Allen Poe: A Study in Genius (New York, 1926).Google Scholar
Kuenzli, Rudolf E., ‘The intersubjective structure of the reading process: a communication-oriented theory of literature’, Diacritics, 10, no. 2 (1980), 47–56.Google Scholar
Kunne-Ibsch, Elrud, ‘Rezeptions for schung: Konstanten und Varianten eines literaturwissenschaftlichen Konzepts in Theorie und Praxis’, Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik, 3 (1974), 1–36.Google Scholar
Kushner, Eva M., ‘The critical method of Gaston Bachelard’, in Slote, Bernice (ed.), Myth and Symbol (Lincoln, NE, 1963), pp. 39–50.Google Scholar
La chambre claire (1980); Camera Lucida, trans. Howard, Richard (New York and London, 1982; Fontana edition, 1984).Google Scholar
‘La dernière des solitudes’, two interviews (1975 and 1979) by Biron, Normand for Radio-Canada, in Revue d'esthétique, nouvelle serie, 2 (1981), 105–9.Google Scholar
La Tour Eiffel (1964). See Mythologies above.
Lacan, Jacques, Ecrits (Paris, 1966); Ecrits: A Selection, trans. Sheridan, Alan (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, Ecrits (Paris, 1966). Parts of this have been translated by Alan Sheridan as Ecrits: A Selection, (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 11: Les Quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse (Paris, 1973); The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, trans. Sheridan, Alan (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 20: Encore (Paris, 1975).Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 1: Les écrits techniques de Freud 1953–4 (Paris, 1975); Freud's Papers on Technique 1953–4, trans. Forrester, John and Tomaselli, Sylvana (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 2: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse (Paris, 1978); The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954–5, trans. Forrester, John and Tomaselli, Sylvana (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 3: Les Psychoses (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 7: L'Ethique de la psychanalyse (Paris, 1986).Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, ‘Desire and the interpretation of desire in Hamlet’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 11–52. Trans, by Hulbert, James.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, ‘Hommage fait à Marguerite Duras’, 1965, reprinted in Marguerite Duras, ed. Barat, Francois and Farges, Joël (Paris, 1979), pp. 131–37.Google Scholar
Lacoue–Labarthe, Philippe, and Nancy, Jean–Luc, Le Titre de la lettre (une Lecture de Lacan) (Paris, 1990).Google Scholar
Lämmert, Eberhart, Bauformen des Erzählens (Stuttgart, 1955).Google Scholar
Lancer, Susan Sniader, The Narrative Act: Point of View in Fiction (Princeton, 1931).Google Scholar
Lancer, Susan ‘Toward a feminist narratology’, Style, 20 (1986), 341–63.Google Scholar
Lang, Peter Christian, Hermeneutik, Ideologiekritik, ästhetik: über Gadamer und Adorno sowie Fragen einer aktuellen ästhetik (Königstein/Ts., 1981).Google Scholar
Laplanche, J., and Pontalis, J. -B., Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse (Paris, 1967); The Language of Psycho-Analysis, trans. Nicholson-Smith, D. (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Laplanche, J.Vie et mort enpsychanalyse (Paris, 1970), Life and Death in Psychoanalysis, trans. Mehlman, J. (Baltimore and London, 1979).Google Scholar
L'Arc, 56 (1974).
L'aventure sémiologique (1985); The Semiotic Challenge, trans. Howard, Richard (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Lavers, A., ‘En traduisant Barthes’, in Tel Quel, 47 (1971), 115–25.Google Scholar
Lavers, A., Roland Barthes: Structuralism and After (London and Cambridge, MA, 1982).Google Scholar
Lavers, A., ‘Ni avec toi, ni sans toi: sens, corps, société’, in Critique, 423–4 (1982), 720–5.Google Scholar
Lavers, A., ‘Logicus Sollers’, TLS (6 December 1968) (on Tel Quel).Google Scholar
Lavers, A., ‘Rejoycing on the left’, TLS (22 September 1972) (on Tel Quel).Google Scholar
Lavers, A., ‘On wings of prophecy’, TLS (1 May 1981) (on Tel Quel).Google Scholar
Lawall, Sarah N., Critics of Consciousness: The Existential Structures of Literature (Cambridge, MA, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, Leonard, ‘Event and repeatability: Ricoeur and Derrida in debate’, Pre/Text, 4 (1983), 317–34.Google Scholar
Le bruissement de la langue, Essais critiques IV (1984); The Rustle of Language, trans. Howard, Richard (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
Le degré zéro de écriture (1953); Writing Degree Zero, trans. Lavers, Annette and Smith, Colin (London and New York, 1967).Google Scholar
Le Galliot, Jean et al., Psychanalyse et langages littéraires (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
Le grain de la voix. Entretiens 1962–1980 (1981); The Grain of the Voice: Interviews 1962–1980, trans. Coverdale, Linda (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Le Magazine littéraire, 97 (1975).
Le plaisir du texte (1973); The Pleasure of the Text, trans, by Miller, Richard (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
Lebensztejn, Jean-Claude, ‘Un tableau de Titien: un essai de Panofsky’, Critique, 29, nos. 315–16, (1973), 821–42.Google Scholar
Leçon: leçon inaugurale de la chaire de sémiologie littéraire du Colleàe de France, prononcée le 7 Janvier 1977 (1978); Inaugural Lecture; trans. Howard, Richard, in Sontag, Susan, A Barthes Reader (1982).Google Scholar
Lecourt, Dominique, Marxism and Epistemology: Bachelard, Canguilhem and Foucault (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Leibfried, Erwin, Literarische Hermeneutik: Eine Einführung in ihre Geschichte und Probleme (Tübingen, 1980).Google Scholar
Leibfried, Erwin, Kritische Wissenschaft vom Text: Manipulation. Reflexion, transparente Poetologie (Stuttgart, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitch, Vincent B., Deconstructive Criticsm: An Advanced Introduction (New York, 1983).Google Scholar
Leitch, Vincent B., American Literary Criticism From the Thirties to the Eighties (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Leitch, Thomas M., ‘To what is fiction committed?’, Prose Studies, 6 (1983), 159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitch, Vincent B., American Literary Criticism from the Thirties to the Eighties (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Lemaire, Anika, Jacques Lacan (Brussels, 1977); trans. Macey, David (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Lemon, Lee T., and Reis, Marion J. (eds.), Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays (Lincoln, NE, 1965).Google Scholar
L'Empire des signes (Geneva, 1970); The Empire of Signs, trans. Howard, Richard (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Lentricchia, Frank, After the New Criticism (Chicago, 1980).Google Scholar
Lentricchia, Frank, Criticism and Social Change (Chicago, 1983).Google Scholar
Lentricchia, Frank, After the New Criticism: (Chicago, 1980).Google Scholar
Lerner, Daniel (ed.), Parts and Wholes (New York, 1963).Google Scholar
LeSage, Laurent (ed.), The French New Criticism: An Introduction and a Sampler (University Park, 1967).Google Scholar
Leschke, Rainer, Metamorphosis des Subjekts: Hermeneutische Reaktionen auf die (post–) strukturalistische Herausforderung (Frankfurt, 1987).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Anthropologic structurale (Paris, 1958): Structural Anthropology, trans. , Claire Jacobson and Schoepf, Brooke Grundfest (New York, 1963).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Anthropologic structurale (Paris, 1955).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, ‘The structural study of myth’ Journal of American Folklore, 78 (1955), 428–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, ‘La structure et la forme. Réflexions sur un ouvrage de Vladimir Propp’, Cahiers de l’Institut de Science économique appliquée, serie M, 7 (1960), 3–36.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Mythologies, 4 vols. (Paris, 1964–1971).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Anthropologic structurale II (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., ‘Sur S/Z’ (1970), in Bellour, R. and Clément, C. (eds.), Claude Lévi-Strauss (1979).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., Le Cm et le Cuit (1964).Google Scholar
Levin, Samuel R., Linguistic Structures in Poetry (The Hague, 1962).Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel, Sur Maurice Blanchot (Montpellier, 1975).Google Scholar
Lewis, Phillip, ‘Revolutionary semiotics’, Diacritics, 10 (1978), 216–22.Google Scholar
Lewis, Philip E., ‘Merleau-Ponty and the phenomenology of language’, Yale French Studies, 36–37 (1966)), 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberstson, Joseph, Proximity, Levinas, Blanchot, Bataille, and Consciousness (The Hague, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Man, Paul, Lindsay Waters (Minneapolis, 1989).Google Scholar
Linhartová, Věra, ‘La place de Roman Jakobson dans la vie littéraire et artistique Tchécoslovaque’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson, pp. 219–35.
Link, Hannelore, ‘"Die Appellstruktur der Texte” und “ein Paradigmawechsel in der Literaturwissenschaft'”, Jarhbuch der deutschen Schillergesellschaft, 17 (1973), 532–83.Google Scholar
Link, Hannelore, Rezeptionsforschung: Eine Einführung in Methoden und Probleme (Stuttgart, 1976).Google Scholar
Lintvelt, Jaap, Essai de typologie narrative: le ‘point de vue’ (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
L‘esprit créateur (1982).
Lloyd, Genevieve, The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy (London, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L'obvie et Vobtus, Essais critiques III (1982); The Responsibility of Forms: Critical Essays on Music, Art and Representation, trans. Howard, Richard (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
Lodge, David, The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature (London, 1977)Google Scholar
Lombardo, Patrizia, The Three Paradoxes of Roland Barthes (Athens, GA, 1989).Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij, Analiz poètičeskogo teksta (Leningrad, 1972); Analysis of the Poetic Text, trans. Johnson, D. Barton (Ann Arbor, MI, 1976).Google Scholar
Lovell, Terry, ‘Jane Austen and gentry society’, in Barker, F. et al. (eds.), Literature, Society and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977), pp. 118–32.Google Scholar
Lovell, Terry, ‘The social relations of cultural production: absent centre of a new discourse’, in One–Dimensional Marxism, ed. Clarke, Simon, (London, 1980), pp. 232–56.Google Scholar
Lubbock, Percy, The Craft of Fiction (London, 1921).Google Scholar
Lund, S. N., L'aventure du signifiant. Une lecture de Barthes (1981).Google Scholar
Lyons, John, Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics (Cambridge, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean Frangois, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, Geoff and Massumi, Brian (Minneapolis, 1984).Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois, La Condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir (Paris, 1979); The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, Geoff and Massumi, Brian [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 10] (Minneapolis, 1984).Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois and Thebaut, Jean-Loup, Au Juste (Paris, 1979); Just Gaming [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 20], trans. Godzich, Wlad (Minneapolis, 1985).Google Scholar
MacCabe, Colin, James Joyce and the Revolution of the Word (London, 1978).Google Scholar
MacCabe, Colin, ‘On discourse’, in The Talking Cure, ed. MacCabe, Colin (London, 1981), pp. 118–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macey, D., Lacan in Contexts (London, 1988).Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre, Pour une theorie de la production litteraire (Paris, 1966); A Theory of Literary Production, trans. Wall, Geoffrey (London, 1978).Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre, ‘Problems of reflection’ in Barker, Francis et al. (eds.), Literature, Society and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977), pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre, ‘An Interview with Pierre Macherey’, trans, and ed. Mercer, Colin and Radford, Jean, Red Letters, 5 (1977), 3–9.Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre, and Balibar, Etienne, ‘Sur la littérature comme forme idéologique’, Littérature, 13 (1974), 29–48; reprinted as preface to Balibar, R., Les Francais fictifs (Paris, 1974); ‘On Literature as an ideological form; trans. McLeod, I., Whitehead, J. and Wordsworth, A., in Young, Robert (ed.), Untying the Text, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar
Mackey, Louis et al., ‘Marxism and deconstruction: symposium at the conference on contemporary genre theory and the Yale School, 1 June 1984’, in Davis, Robert Con and Schleifer, Ronald (eds.), Rhetoric and Form: Deconstruction at Yale (Norman, OK, 1985), pp. 75–97.Google Scholar
Macksey, Richard, and Donato, Eugenio (eds.), The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man: The Structuralist Controversy (Baltimore, 1970) rpt. 1972 as The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man).Google Scholar
Magliola, Robert R., Phenomenology and Literature: An Introduction (West Lafayette, IN, 1977).Google Scholar
Magny, Claude-Edmonde, L'âge du roman américain (Paris, 1948).Google Scholar
Magowan, Robin, ‘Jean-Pierre Richard and the criticism of sensation’, Criticism, 6 (1964), 156–64.Google Scholar
Mailloux, Steven, ‘How to be persuasive in literary theory: the case of Wolfgang Iser’, Centrum, n.s., 1 (1981), 65–73.Google Scholar
Mailloux, Steven, Interpretive Conventions: The Reader in the Study of American Fiction (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
Mailloux, Steven, Interpretive Conventions: The Reader in the Study of American Fiction (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
Mailloux, Steven, ‘Convention and context’, New Literary History, 14 (1983), 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailloux, Steven, ‘Rhetorical hermeneutics’, Critical Inquiry, 11 (1985), 620–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailloux, Steven, Rhetorical Power (Ithaca, 1989).Google Scholar
Mallac, G., and Eberbach, M., Barthes (1971).Google Scholar
Mandelkow, Karl Robert, ‘Probleme der Wirkungsästhetik’, Jahrbuch für Internationale Germanistik, 2 (1970), 71–84.Google Scholar
Mandelkow, Karl ‘Rezeptionsästhetik und marxistische Literaturtheorie’, in , Walter Müller-Seidel (ed.), Historizität in Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft (Munich, 1974), pp. 379–88.Google Scholar
Mannoni, Maud, La Th7eacute;orie comme fiction (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar
Mansuy, Michel, Gaston Bachelard et les éléments (Paris, 1967).Google Scholar
Margolin, Jean Claude, Bachelard (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph (ed.), ‘Schleiermacher among the theorists of language and interpretation’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 45 (1987), 361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, JosephPhilosophy Looks at the Arts: Contemporary Readings in Aesthetics (Philadelphia, 1987).Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph, ‘Literature and speech acts,’ Philosophy and Literature, 3 (1979), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Joseph, ‘The logic and structures of fictional narrative’, Philosophy and Literature, 7 (1983), 168–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, Louis, Le Portrait du Roi (Paris, 1971); Portrait of the King, trans. Houle, Martha M. (London, 1988).Google Scholar
Marin, Louis, ‘Disneyland: a degenerate Utopia’, Glyph, 1, (1977), 50–66.Google Scholar
Marino, Adrian, ‘Hermeneutics as criticism’, Visible Language, 17 (1983), 206–15.Google Scholar
Martens, Gunter, ‘Textstrukturen aus rezeptionsästhetischer Sicht. Perspektiven einer Textästhetik auf der Grundlage des Prager Strukturalismus’, Wirkendes Wort, 25 (1973), 359–79.Google Scholar
Martin, Wallace, Recent Theories of Narrative (Ithaca, 1986).Google Scholar
Martin, Wallace, ‘The hermeneutic circle and the art of interpretation’ Comparative Literature 24 (1972), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Wallace, ‘Interpretation, modern’, in Preminger, Alex (ed.), Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (Princeton, 1974), pp. 943–7, pp. 943–7.Google Scholar
Martland, T. R., ‘Austin, art, and anxiety’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 29 (1970), 169–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R., ‘Paul Ricoeur's theory of interpretation: some implications for critical inquiry in art education’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 16 (1982), 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav, and Pomorska, Krystyna (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views (Cambridge, MA, 1971).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav and Titunik, Irwin R. (eds.), Semiotics of Art. Prague School Contributions (Cambridge, MA, 1976).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav, Crossroads of Sound and Meaning (Lisse, 1975).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav, ‘Postscript: Prague School semiotics’, in Matejka, L. and Titunik, I. R. (eds.), Semiotics of Art. Prague School Contributions (Cambridge, MA, 1976), pp. 265–98.Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav (ed.), Sound, Sign and Meaning. Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle (Ann Arbor, MI, 1978).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav, ‘The roots of Russian semiotics of art’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.) The Sign, pp. 146–72.
Matejka, Ladislav, and Titunik, Irwin R. (eds.), Semiotics of Art ‘(London, 1976).Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém ‘Deset let Pražskeho linguistickeℏo kroužku’ [Ten years of the Prague Linguistic Circle] (1936), qtd. from Eng. trans, in Vachek, J., The Linguistic School of Prague (Bloomington, 1966).Google Scholar
Mathieu-Colas, Michel, ‘Frontièresdelanarratologie’, Po´tique, 65 (1986), 91–110.Google Scholar
Maurer, Karl, ‘Formen des Lesens’, Poetica, 9 (1977), 472–98.Google Scholar
Mauron, C., L'inconscient dans Voeuvre et la vie de Racine (1954).Google Scholar
Mayenowa, Maria Renata, ‘Classic statements of the semiotic theory of art: Mukařovský and Morris’, in Matejka, (ed.), Sound, pp. 425–32.
McCarthy, Thomas, ‘On the margins of polities’, Journal of Philosophy, 85 (1988), 645–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, Edgar, Meaning in Texts: The Historical Shaping of a Narrative Hermeneutics (Philadelphia, 1978).Google Scholar
Medvedev, Pavel, Forma'nyj metod: Kriticeskoe vvedenie v sociologiceskuju poetiku (Leningrad, 1928).Google Scholar
Medvedev, Pavel, Formalizm iformalisty (Leningrad, 1934).Google Scholar
Medvedev, P. N. (attributed to M. Bakhtin), The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics, trans. Wehrle, Albert J. (Cambridge, MA, 1985).Google Scholar
Megill, Allan, Prophets of Extremity (Berkeley, 1985).Google Scholar
Mehlman, Jeffrey, A Structural Study of Autobiography (Ithaca, 1974).Google Scholar
Mèhlman, Jeffrey, ‘Trimethylamin: notes on Freud's specimen dream’, in Young, R. (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post–Structuralist Reader (London, 1981), pp. 177–88.Google Scholar
Meier, George Friedrich, Versuch einer allgemeinen Auslegekunst (Halle, 1757).Google Scholar
Melkonian, Martin, Le corps couché de Roland Barthes (1989).Google Scholar
Mercer, Colin, ‘Baudelaire and the City: 1848 and the inscription of Hegemony’, in Barker, F. et al. (eds), Literature, Politics and Theory (London, 1986), 17–34.Google Scholar
Mercks, Kees, ‘The semantic gesture and the guinea pigs’, in Amsenga, B. J. et al. (eds.), Voz'mi na radosf. To Honour Jeanne van der Eng-liedmeier (Amsterdam, 1980)1980), pp. 309–22.Google Scholar
Meregalli, Franco, ‘Sur la réception litteraire’, Revue de litterature comparée, 54 (1980), 139–49.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Ph7eacute;noménologie de la perception (Paris, 1945); Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Smith, Colin (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, ‘Le Primat de la perception et ses conséquences philosophiques’, Bulletin de la Société Française de Philosophie, 41 (1947), 119–53.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Sens et non-sens (Paris, 1948); Sense and Nonsense, trans. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Dreyfus, Patricia Allen (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Signes (Paris, 1960); Signs, trans. McCleary, Richard C. (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, L'Oeil et l'esprit (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Le Visible et l'invisible: suivi de notes de travail (Paris, 1964); The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Lingis, Alphonso (Evanston, 1968).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, The Essential Writings of Merleau-Ponty, ed. Fisher, Alden L. (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
Merquior, J. G., From Prague to Paris. A Critique of Structuralist and Post-structuralist Thought (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Métraux, Alexandre, ‘Zur phänomenologischenÄsthetik Moritz Geigers’, Studia Philosophica, 28 (1968), 68–92.Google Scholar
Metz, Christian, Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, trans. Taylor, Michael (New York, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Christian, Essais sur la signification au cinéma (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Metz, C., Le signifiant imaginaire. Psychanalyse et cinéma (1984); Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, The Imaginary Signifier, trans. Britton, Celia, Williams, Annwyl, Brewster, Ben and Guzzetti, Alfred (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Metz, Christian, Le Signifiant imaginaire (Paris, 1977); Psychoanalysis and Cinema: The Imaginary Signifier (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Michelet par lui-même (1954); Michelet, trans. Howard, Richard (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Michelfelder, Diane P., and Palmer, Richard E. (eds.), Dialogue and Deconstruction (Albany, 1989).Google Scholar
Michels, Gerd, Textanalyse und Textverstehen (Heidelberg, 1981).Google Scholar
Michelson, Annette, et al. (eds.) October – The First Decade (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Miller, Joan, French Structuralism: A Multidisciplinary Bibliography (New York, 1981).Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, ‘Ariachne's broken woof’, Georgia Review, 31 (1977), 44–60.Google Scholar
Miller, J.The Ethics of Reading: Kant, de Man, Eliot, Trollope, James, and Benjamin (New York, 1987).Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, Charles Dickens: The World of His Novels (Cambridge, MA, 1958).Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, The Disappearance of God (Cambridge, MA, 1963).Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, Poets of Reality (Cambridge, MA, 1965).Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, ‘The literary criticism of Georges Poulet’, Modern Language Notes, 78 (1963), 471–88.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis ‘The Geneva School: the criticism of Marcel Raymond, Albert Béguin, Georges Poulet, Jean Rousset, Jean-Pierre Richard, and Jean Starobinski’, Critical Quarterly, 8 (1966)), 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis ‘Geneva or Paris: the recent work of Georges Poulet’, University of Toronto Quarterly, 39 (1970), 212–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. ‘But are things as we think they are?’ Times Literary Supplement (9–15 October 1987), 1104–5.Google Scholar
Miller, Robin Feuer, Dostoevsky and The Idiot: Author, Narrator, and Reader (Providence, MA, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W.J.T., Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (Chicago, 1986).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet, and Rose, Jacqueline: ‘Introduction’, Feminine Sexuality, ed. Mitchell, and Rose, (London, 1982), 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mode, Système (1967); The Fashion System, trans. Ward, Matthew and Howard, Richard (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Mohanty, S. P. (ed.), Marx after Derrida, a special issue of Diacritics (Winter 1985).Google Scholar
Moi, Toril, Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Moi, Toril (ed.), The Kristeva Reader (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
Montrelay, Michèle, L'Ombre et le nom (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
Montrelay, Michèle, ‘Inquiry into femininity’, trans. Adams, Parveen, m/f 1 (1978), 65–101.Google Scholar
Moog-Gründewald, Maria, ‘Einfluss- und Rezeptions for schung’, in Schmeling, Manfred (ed.), Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft: Theorie und Praxis (Wiesbaden, 1981), PP. 49–72.Google Scholar
Moriarty, M., Roland Barthes (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Morin, E., ‘Le retrouv´ et le perdu’, in Communications, 36 (1982), 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrissette, B., Les romans de Robbe-Grillet (1963).Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul and Emerson, Caryl, Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics (Stanford, 1990).Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul, The Boundaries of Genre: Dostoevsky's Diary of a Writer and the Traditions of Literary Utopia (Austin, 1981).Google Scholar
Mounier, Jacques, ‘La Terminologie françhise des études de réception’, Oeuvres … Critiques, 11 (1986), 143–5.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges, Ferdinand de Saussure, ou le structuraliste sans le savoir (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Moynihan, Robert, A Recent Imagining: Interviews with Harold Bloom, Geoffrey Hartman, J. Hillis Miller, Paul de Man (Hamden, CN, 1986).Google Scholar
Možejko, Edward, ‘Slovak theory of literary communication: notes on the Nitra school of literary criticism’, PTL – A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 4 (1979), 371–84.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, Máchuv Máj. Estetická studie [Maácha's May. An aesthetic study] (1928), Kapitoly, III, 7–201.
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Jazyk spisovný a jazyk básnický’ [Standard language and poetic language], in Havránek, B. and Weingart, M. (eds.), Spisovná čeština a jazyková kultura (Prague, 1932), 123–56; Eng. trans, (part) in Garvin, , Reader17–30.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Obecné zaásady a vývoj novocečeského verše’ [General principles and evolution of modern Czech verse] (1934), Kapitoly, II, 9–90.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Polákova Vznešenost přfrody’ [Polák's Sublimity of Nature] (1934), Kapitoly, II 91–176.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘K českému překladu Šklovského Teorie prózy’ [A note on the Czech translation of Shklovsky's Theory of Prose] (1934), Kapitoly, I, 344–50; Eng. trans. in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word, 134–42;Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘L'Art comme fait sémiologique’, in Actes du huitième Congrès international de philosophic (Prague, 1936), 1065–72; trans, Czech, in Studie zestetiky; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure, 82–8.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, Estetická funkce, norma a hodnota jako sociálmífakty (1936), Studie z estetiky, 17–54; Eng. trans. Aesthetic Function, Norm and Value as Social Facts (Ann Arbor, MI, 1970).Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘K problému funkci v architektuře’ [On the problem of functions in architecture] (1937/1938), Studie z estetiky; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Dénomination poétique et la fonction esthétique de la langue’, in Hjelmslev, L. et al. (eds.), Actes du IVe Congrès international des linguistes (Copenhagen, 1936), 98–104; Czech trans, in Kapitoly, I 157–63; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word, 65–73.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Genetika smyslu v Máchově poesii’ [Genesis of sense in Mácha's poetry] (1938), Kapitoly, III, 239–310.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Nové nèmecké dílo o základech literárni vědy’ [A new German work on the foundations of the science of literature] (1939), Studie z poetiky, 337–46.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Strukturalismus v estetice a ve vědě o literatuře’ [Structuralism in aesthetics and in the science of literature] (1939/1940), Kapitoly, II, 13–28; Eng. trans. Steiner, in (ed.), Prague School, 65–82.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Estetika jazyka’ [Aesthetics of language] (1940), Kapitoly, I, 41–77.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Ojazyce básnickém’ [On poetic language] (1940), Kapitoly, I, 78–128; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word, 1–64.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Dialog a monolog’ [Dialogue and monologue] (1940), Kapitoly, I, 129–53; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word, 81–112.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Básník’ [The poet] (1941), Studie z estetiky, 144–52; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Word, 143–60.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Mfísto estetické funkce mezi ostatními’ [The place of the aesthetic function among the other functions] (1942), Studie z estetiky, 65–73; Eng. trans. in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure, 31–48.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘Význam estetiky’ [The significance of aesthetics] (1942), Studie z estetiky, 55–61; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure17–30.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘O strukturalismu’ [On structuralism] (1946), Studie z estetiky, 109–16; Eng. trans, in Steiner, and Burbank, (eds.), Structure, 3–16.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, ‘K pojmosloví československé teorie uměni’ [On the conceptural system of the Czechoslovak theory of art] (1947), Kapitoly, I,29–40.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, Kapitoly z české poetiky [Chapters from Czech poetics], 3 vols. (Prague, 1948).Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, Studie z estetiky [Studies from aesthetics] (Prague, 1966).Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan, Studie z poetiky [Studies from poetics] (Prague, 1982).Google Scholar
Mulhern, Francis, ‘Ideology and literary form—a comment’, New Left Review, 91 (1975), 80–7.Google Scholar
Mulhern, Francis, ‘Marxism in literary criticism’, New Left Review, 108 (1978), 77–87.Google Scholar
Müller, Günther, Morphologische Poetik (Tubingen, 1968).Google Scholar
Muller, John, ‘Psychosis and mourning in Lacan's Hamlet’, New Literary History, 12 (1980), 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, John and Richardson, William: Lacan and Language (New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Müller-Vollmer, Kurt, ‘Understanding and interpretation: toward a definition of literary hermeneutics’, Yearbook of Comparative Criticism, 10 (1983, 41–77).Google Scholar
Müller-Vollmer, Kurt (ed.), The Hermeneutics Reader (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Murray, Michael, ‘The conflict between poetry and literature’, Philosophy and Literature, 9 (1985), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mythologies (1957); a selection of Mythologies, trans. Lavers, Annette (London and New York, 1972). The other original essays except ‘Astrologie’ and five new essays were translated by Richard Howard as The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies (New York, 1979).Google Scholar
Nägele, Rainer, ‘Text, history and the critical subject: notes on Peter Szondi's theory and praxis of hermeneutics’, Boundary 2, 11 (1983, 29–51).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, Teun ‘Narrative macro-structures: logical and cognitive foundations’, PTL, 1 (1976), 547–68.Google Scholar
Nassen, Ulrich (ed.), Klassiker der Hermeneutik (Paderborn, 1982).Google Scholar
Nassen, UlrichTexthermeneutik: Aktualität, Geschichte, Kritik (Paderborn, 1979).Google Scholar
Natoli, Joseph (ed.), Literary Theory's Future(s) (Urbana, IL, 1989).Google Scholar
Natoli, JosephTracing Literary Theory (Urbana, IL, 1987).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred, ‘Literatur und Leser’, Weimarer Beiträge, 16, no. 5 (1970), 92–116.Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred, ‘Das Dilemma der “Rezeptionsästhetik”’, Poetica, 8 (1976), 451–66.Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred, ‘Literary production and reception’, New Literary History, 8 (1976), 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naumann, Manfred, ‘Bemerkungen zur Literaturrezeption als geschichtliches und gesellschaftliches Ereignis’, in Rinner, Fridrun and Zerinschek, Klaus (eds.), Komparatistik: Theoretische UÜberlegungen und südosteuropäische Wechselseitigkeit. Festschrift fur Zoran Konstantinovic (Heidelberg, 1981), pp. 159–68.Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred, Blickpunkt Leser (Leipzig, 1984).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred et al., Gesellschaft – Literatur – Lesen: Literaturrezeption in theoretischer Sicht (Weimar, 1973).Google Scholar
Naumann, ManfredPoetik und Hermeneutik: Arbeitsergebnisse einer Forschungsgruppe, Fink, Miünchen, 1964 ff.Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred I. Nachahmung und Illusion, 1964, Jauss, Hans Robert (ed.).Google Scholar
Naumann, ManfredW.lmmanente Ästhetik – Ästhetische Reflexion, 1966, Iser, Wolfgang (ed.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred III. Die nicht mehr schönen Kiünste, 1968, Hans Robert Jauss (ed.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred IV. Terror und Spiel, 1971, Fuhrmann, Manfred (ed.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred V '.Geschichte – Ereignis und Erzählung, 1973, Koselleck, Reinhart and Stempel, Wolf-Dieter (eds.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred Vl. Positionen der Negativität, 1975, Weinrich, Harald (ed.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred VII. Das Komische, 1976, Preisendanz, Wolfgang and Warning, Rainer (eds.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred VIII. Identität, 1979, Marquard, Odo and Stierle, Karlheinz (eds.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred IX. Text und Applikation, 1981, Furhmann, Manfred, Jauss, Hans Robert, and Pannenberg, Wolfhart (eds.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred X. Funktionen des Fiktiven, 1983, Hinrich, Dieter and Iser, Wolfgang (eds.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred XL Das Gespräch, 1984, Stierle, Karlheinz and Warning, Rainer (eds.).Google Scholar
Naumann, Manfred XII. Epochenschwelle und Epochenbewufitsein, 1986, Herzog, Reinhart and Koselleck, Reinhart (eds.).Google Scholar
New Literary History, ‘On interpretation I’, 3, no. 2 (1972); ‘On interpretation II’, 4, no. 2 (1973); ‘Literary hermeneutics’, 10, no. 1 (1978).
Newcomb, Anthony, ‘Schumann and late eighteenth century narrative strategies’, 9th-Century Music, 9 (1987), 164–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, christopher, Deconstruction: Theory and Practice (London, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, christopher, The Deconstructive Turn: Essays in the Rhetoric of Philosophy (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Norris, christopher, Derrida (Cambridge, MA, 1987).Google Scholar
Norris, christopher, Paul de Man, Deconstruction and the Critique of Aesthetic Ideology (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher, ‘"That the truest philosophy is the most feigning": Austin on the margins of literature’, in The Deconstructive Turn: Essays in the Rhetoric of Philosophy (London, 1983), pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher, Deconstruction: Theory and Practice (London, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Christopher, Subjective Criticism (Baltimore, 1978).Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher, ‘Teleology and taxonomy in critical explanation’, Bucknell Review, 26, no. 1 (1981), 102–27.Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher, ‘Intersubjective reading’, New Literary History, 17 (1986), 401–21.Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher, The Double Perspective: Language, Literacy, and Social Relations (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Nouveaux essais critiques, collected with Le degré zéro de Vécriture (1972); New Critical Essays, trans. Howard, Richard (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
Novitz, David, ‘The rage for deconstruction’, The Monist, 69 (1986), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odmark, John (ed.), Language, Literature and Meaning, I – Problems of Literary Theory (Amsterdam, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oeuvres complètes, 1942–1965, tome 1, ed. Marty, E. (1993).Google Scholar
Ohmann, Richard, ‘Speech acts and definition of literature’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 4 (1971), 1–19.Google Scholar
Ohmann, Richard, ‘Instrumental style: notes on the theory of speech as action’, in Kachru, Braj B. and Stahlke, Herbert F. W. (eds.), Current Trends in Stylistics (Champaign, IL, 1972). PP. 115–41.Google Scholar
Ohmann, Richard, ‘Speech, literature, and the space between,’ New Literary History, 4 (1972), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Michel, and Kelstrup, Gunver. ‘Rezeptionsforschung: Introduktion’, Kursiv, 20, no. 2 (1982), 65–75.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. S. J., ‘The writer's audience is always a fiction,’ Publications of the Modern Language Association, 90 (1975), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormiston, Gayle L., and Schrift, Alan D. (eds.), The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur (Albany, 1989).Google Scholar
Ormiston, GayleTransforming the Hermeneutic Context: From Nietzsche to Nancy (Albany, 1989).Google Scholar
Orr, Leonard, ‘Receptions-aesthetics as a tool in literary criticism and historiography’, Language Quarterly, 21, no. 3–4 (1983), 35–36, 52.Google Scholar
Oxenhandler, Neal, ‘Paradox and negation in the criticism of Maurice Blanchot’, Symposium, 16 (1962)), 36–44.Google Scholar
Palmer, Richard E., Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer (Evanston, 1969).Google Scholar
Palmer, Richard E. ‘Phenomenology as foundation for a post–modern philosophy of literary inter pretation’, Cultural Hermeneutics, 1 (1973), 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Richard E. ‘Toward a postmodern hermeneutics of performance’, in Bernamou, Michel and Cramello, Charles (eds.), Performance in Post–modern Culture (Madison, 1977), 19–32.Google Scholar
Palmer, Richard E. ‘Postmodern hermeneutics and the act of reading’, Religion and Literature, 15 (1983), 55–84.Google Scholar
Paragraph, 11, Nos 2 and 3 (July, November 1988).
Parret, H. and Ruprecht, H. G., Aims and Prospects of Semiotics (Amsterdam, 1985)Google Scholar
Pasternack, Gerhard, Theoriebildung in der Literaturwissenschaft: Einführung in Grund– fragen des Interpretationspluralismus (Munich, 1975).Google Scholar
Pasternack, Gerhard, Interpretation (Munich, 1979).Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas, La syntaxe narrative des tragédies de Corneille (Paris, 1976).Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas, ‘Narrative domains’, Poetics Today, 1 (1980), 105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Thomas, ‘Le déploiement de l'intrigue’, Poétique, 64 (1985), 455–61.Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas, The Poetics of Plot: The Case of English Renaissance Drama (Minneapolis, 1985).Google Scholar
Pêcheux, Michel, Les Vérités de la Palice (Paris, 1975); Language, Semantics and Ideology: Stating the Obvious, trans. Nagpal, Harbans (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Peck, Jeffrey M., ‘Bibliography of hermeneutics: literary and biblical interpretation’, Comparative Criticism, 5 (1983), 347–56.Google Scholar
Pedrick, Victoria, and Rabinowitz, Nancy Sorkin (eds.), Audience Oriented Criticism and the Classics, Special Issue of Arethusa, 19, no. 2 (1986).Google Scholar
Peinture du signe, Maison Descartes (Amsterdam, 1982).
Peirce, Charles Sanders, Collected Papers, ed. Hartshorne, Charles, Weiss, Paul, and Burks, Arthur W., 8 vols., Vols. 1–6 (Cambridge, MA, 1931–1935), vols. 7–8 (Cambridge, MA, 1958).Google Scholar
Peirce, CharlesPhilosophical Writings, ed. Buchler, Justus (New York, 1955).Google Scholar
Peirce, CharlesPeirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic, ed. Hoopes, James (Chapel Hill, 1991).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders, Collected Papers, ed. Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul, 8 vols. (Cambridge, MA, 1931–1958), 1931–58.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders, Philosophical Writings, ed. Buchler, Justus (New York, 1955).Google Scholar
Petrey, Sandy, ‘Castration, speech acts, and the realist difference: S/Z versus Sarrasine’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 102 (1987), 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, James, Reading People, Reading Plots: Character, Progression, and the Interpretation of Narrative (Chicago, 1989).Google Scholar
Phelan, James (ed.), Reading Narrative: Form, Ethics, Ideology (Columbus, OH, 1989).Google Scholar
Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (London, 1980).Google Scholar
Picon, Gaëtan, ‘L'Oeuvre critique de Maurice Blanchot’, Critique 14 (1956), 675–94 and 836–54.Google Scholar
Pire, Francois, Del Imagination dans Voeuvre de Gaston Bachelard (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Poétique, 47 (1981).
Polivanov, Evgeni, ‘Po povodu “zvukovych zestov” japonskogo jazyka’, Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka (Petersburg, 1916), I.Google Scholar
Pomorska, Krystyna, ‘Roman Jakobson and the new poetics’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson, pp. 363–78.
Pomorska, Krystyna et al. (eds.), Language, Poetry and Poetics. The Generation of the 1890s: Jakobson, Trubeckoj, Majakovskij (Proceedings of the First Roman Jakobson Colloquium) (Berlin, 1987).Google Scholar
Pos, H.J. ‘Perspectives du structuralisme’, Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, VIII (1939), 71–8.Google Scholar
Pouillon, Jean, Temps et roman (Paris, 1946).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Etudes sur le temps humain (Edinburgh, 1949); Studies in Human Time, trans. Coleman, Elliott (Baltimore, 1959).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, La Distance intérieure: Etudes sur le temps humain II (Paris, 1952); The Interior Distance, trans. Coleman, Elliott (Baltimore, 1959).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Les Métemorphoses du cercle (Paris, 1961); The Metamorphoses of the Circle, trans. Dawson, Carley and Coleman, Elliott (Baltimore, 1967).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, L'Espace proustien (Paris, 1963); Proustian Space, trans. Coleman, Elliott (Balti more, 1977).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Le Point de départ: Etudes sur le temps humain III (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Mesure de Vinstant: Etudes sur le temps humain IV (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, ‘Phenomenology of reading’, New Literary History, 1 (1969), 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulet, Georges, ‘Poulet on Poulet: the self and the other in critical consciousness’, Diacritics, 2, no. 1 (1971), 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Entre moi et moi: Essais critiques sur la conscience de soi (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, La poésie éclatée: Baudelaire, Rimbaud (Paris, 1980); Exploding Poetry: Baudelaire, Rimbaud, trans. Meltzer, Francoise (Chicago, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulet, Georges, La pensée indéterminée (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, ‘Bachelard et la critique contemporaine’, in Currents of Thought in French Literature (Oxford, 1965)1965), pp. 353–7.Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, ‘Maurice Blanchot, critique et romancier’, Critique 22 (1966), 485–97.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise, A Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse (Bloomington, 1977).Google Scholar
PrattLouise, Mary, Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse (Bloomington, 1977).Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary ‘The ideology of speech-act theory’, Centrum, 1 (1981)), 5–18.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise, ‘Interpretive strategies/strategic interpretations: on Anglo-American reader response criticism,’ Boundary 2, 11 (1981/1982), 201–31.Google Scholar
Pre/text, 4, nos. 3–4 (1983) (Ricoeur and Rhetoric).
Preli, Georges, La Force du dehors: extériorité, limit et nonpouvoir à partir de Maurice Blanchot (Fontenay-sous-Bris, 1977).Google Scholar
Preston, John, The Created Self: The Reader's Role in Eighteenth-Century Fiction (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald ‘Notes towards a categorization of fictional “narratees”’, Genre, 4 (1971), 100–5.Google Scholar
Prince, GeraldA Grammar of Stories: An Introduction (The Hague, 1973).Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald ‘Introduction à l'étude du narrataire’, Poétique, 14 (1973), 178–96.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald ‘Aspects of a grammar of narrative’, Poetics Today, 1 (1980), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, GeraldNarratology. The Form and Functioning of Narrative (Berlin, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Gerald ‘Narrative pragmatics, message, and point’, Poetics, 12 (1983), 527–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Gerald ‘The disnarrated’, Style, 22 (1988), 1–8.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald ‘Le thème du récit’, Communications, 47 (1988), 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Gerald, A Dictionary of Narratology (Lincoln, NE, 1987).Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald, ‘Introduction à l'étude du narrataire,’ Poetique no. 14 (1973); rpt. as ‘Introduction to the Study of the Narratee’, trans. Marineer, Francis, in Tompkins, Jane (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980), pp. 7–25.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald, ‘Notes on the text as reader’, in Suleiman, Susan R. and Crosman, Inge (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 225–40.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald, Narratology: The Form and Functioning of Narrative (Berlin, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procházka, Miroslav, Příspěvek k problematice sémiologie literatury a umění [A Contribution to the semiology of literature and art] (Prague, 1969).Google Scholar
Profitt, Edward, review of Is There a Text in This Class? by Fish, Stanley, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 17 (1983), 123–25.
Propp, Vladimir, Morfologija skazki (Leningrad, 1928).Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir, The Morphology of the Folktale, trans. Scott, L. (Austin, 1968).Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir, Morphologie du conte, trans. Derrida, M. et al. (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir, Morphologie des Marchens, trans. Wendt, Ch. (Munich, 1972).Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir, Morphology of the Folktale, trans. Scott, Laurence (Bloomington, 1958).Google Scholar
Prucha, Jan, Pragmalinguistics: East European Approaches (Amsterdam, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quillet, Pierre, Gaston Bachelard (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, Peter J., ‘Truth in fiction: a reexamination of audiences’, Critical Inquiry, 4 (1977)), 121–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, Peter ‘"What's Hecuba to Us?: the audience's experience of literary borrowing,’ in Suleiman, Susan R. and Crosman, Inge (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 241–63.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, Peter ‘Circumstantial evidence: musical analysis and theories of reading’, Mosaic, 18, no. 4 (1985), 159–73.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, PeterBefore Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation (Ithaca, 1987).Google Scholar
Radway, Janice, Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature (Chapel Hill, 1984).Google Scholar
Raglan, FitzRoy Richard Somerset, Lord, , The Hero, A Study in Tradition, Myth, and Drama (London, 1936).Google Scholar
Ragland Sullivan, Ellie, ‘The magnetism between reader and text: prolegomena to a Lacanian poetics’, Poetics, 13 (1984), 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragland Sullivan, Ellie, Jacques Lacan and the Question of Psychoanalysis (Illinois, 1986).Google Scholar
Rantavaara, Ira, ‘Hermeneutics and literary research’, in Köpeczi, Béla and Vajda, György (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, II (Stuttgart, 1980), pp. 605–9.Google Scholar
Rastier, François, Essais de sémiotique discursive (Tours, 1973).Google Scholar
Ray, William, Literary Meaning: From Phenomenology to Deconstruction (Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar
Ray, William, Research in Phenomenology, 10 (1980), 1–173 [special issue on Merleau-Ponty].Google Scholar
Raymond, Marcel, De Baudelaire au surréalisme (Paris, 1933); From Baudelaire to Surrealism (New York, 1950).Google Scholar
Raymond, Marcel, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: la quête de soi et la rêverie (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar
Raynaud, Jean-Michel, ‘De l'irrecevabilité de l'esthétique de la réception mais encore’ Revue des Sciences Humaines, 1, no. 189 (1983), 159–180.Google Scholar
Reese, Walter, Literarische Rezeption (Stuttgart 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichert, John, Making Sense of Literature (Chicago, 1977).Google Scholar
Reichert, John, ‘But that was in another ball park: a reply to Stanley Fish’, Critical Inquiry, 6 (1979). 164–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichler, C., La diabolie, la renardie, Vecriture (1979).Google Scholar
Renský, Miroslav, ‘Roman Jakobson and the Prague school’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson, pp. 379–89.
‘Réponses’, Tel Quel, 47 (Autumn, 1971),89–107. An interview by Thibaudeau, Jean in a special issue on Barthes. Essential reading.Google Scholar
Lauretis, Teresa, ‘Review of An Introduction to Literary Semiotics by Maria Cort and The Role of the Reader by Umberto Eco’, Clio, 10 (1980), 93–5.Google Scholar
Revue d'esthétique, 2 (1981). Special issue on Sartre and Barthes.
Rey, Jean–Michel, ‘Freud's writing on writing’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 301–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricardou, Jean, Pour une théorie du nouveau roman (Paris, 1971). Le nouveau roman (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre, Littérature et sensation (Paris, 1954).Google Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre, Poésie et profundeur (Paris, 1955).Google Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre, L'Univers imaginaire de Mallarmé (Paris, 1961).Google Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre, Onze études sur la poésie moderne (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Temos et récit, 3 vols. (Paris, 1983–1984).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, De L'interprétation: essai sur Freud (Paris, 1965); Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, trans. Savage, Denis (New Haven, 1970).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Le Conflit des interprétation (Paris, 1969); The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, trans. Ihde, Don (Evanston, 1974).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘The hermeneutical function of distanciation’, Philosophy Today, 17 (1973), 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘Ethics and culture: Habermas and Gadamer in dialogue’, Philosophy Today, 17 (1973)> 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘Phenomenology and hermeneutics’, Noûs, 9 (1975), 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘Philosophical hermeneutics and theological hermeneutics’, Studies in Religion, 5 (1975), 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning (Fort Worth, 1976).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘Schleiermacher's hermeneutics’, The Monist, 60 (1977), 181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘Writing as a problem for literary criticism and philosophical hermeneutics’, Philosophical Exchange, 2 (1977), 3–15.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘Constructing and constructing, Book Review: E. D. Hirsch, Jr., The Aims of Interpretation’, The Times Literary Supplement, 197 (25 February 1977), 216.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An Anthology of His Work, ed. Reagan, Charles E. and Stewart, David (Boston, 1978).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘On interpretation’, in Montefiori, A. (ed.), Philosophy in France Today (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 175–97.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘Narrative and hermeneutics’, in Fisher, John (ed.), Essays on Aesthetics: Perspec tives on the Work of Monroe C. Beardsley (Philadelphia, 1983), 149–60.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Temps et récit, 3 vols. (Paris, 1983–1985); Time and Narrative, trans. McLaughlin, Kathleen and Pellauer, David (Chicago, 1984–1988).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, ‘The Text as dynamic identity’, in Valdés, Mario J. (ed.), Identity of the Literary Text (Toronto, 1985), pp. 175–86.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Essais d'hermeneutique (Paris, 1986).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology (Evanston, 1967).Google Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael, Essais de stylistique structurale (Paris, 1971). Semiotics of Poetry (Bloomington, 1978).Google Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael, ‘Describing poetic structures: two approaches to Baudelaire's “Les chats'”, Yale French Studies 36–7 (1966). 200–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael, ‘Hermeneutic models’, Poetics Today, 4 (1983), 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael, Semiotics of Poetry (Bloomington, 1978).Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith, Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics (London, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riquelme, John Paul, ‘The ambivalence of reading’, Diacritics, 10, no. 2 (1980), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, Elias L., Things Done with Words: Speech Acts in Hispanic Drama (Providence, DE, 1986).Google Scholar
Robinson, James M., and Cobb, John B. (eds.), The New Hermeneutic (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
Roger, P., Roland Barthes, Roman (1986).Google Scholar
Roland Barthes par Roland Barthes (1975); Barthes by Barthes, trans Howard, Richard (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Roland Barthes, 1915–1980 (1990)
Roland Barthes. A Bibliographical Reader's Guide, by Freedman, Sanford and Taylor, Carole Anne (New York and London, 1983)Google Scholar
Roland Barthes: le texte et Vimage, Pavilion des Arts (1986). Incidents (1987).
Rorty, Richard, ‘Deconstruction and circumvention’, Critical Inquiry, 11 (1984), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ‘The higher nominalism in a nutshell: a reply to Henry Staten’, Critical Inquiry, 12 (1986), 462–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ‘Pragmatism, Davidson and truth’, in LePore, Ernest (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford, 1986), PP 333–55.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ‘Two senses of “logocentrism": a reply to Norris’, in Dasenbrock, Reed Way (ed.), Redrawing the Lines: Analytic Philosophy, Deconstruction, and Literary Theory (Minneapolis, 1989).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ‘Is Derrida a transcendental philosopher?’, Yale Journal of Criticism, 2 (April, 1989), 207–17.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ‘Deconstruction and circumvention’, Critical Inquiry, 11 (1984), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z., ‘The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy,’ Language in Society, 11 (1982), 203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Stanley, Hermeneutics as Politics (New York, 1987).Google Scholar
Rosen, Stanley, ‘The limits of interpretation’, in Cascardi, Anthony J. (ed.), Literature and the Question of Philosophy (Baltimore, 1987), pp. 213–41.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Louis M., Literature as Exploration (New York, 1938).Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, LouisThe Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work (Providence, IL, 1978).Google Scholar
Rousset, Jean, Narcisse romancier: essai sur la première personne dans le roman (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Rousset, Jean, La Littérature de Vâge baroque en France (Paris, 1953).Google Scholar
Rousset, Jean, Forme et signification (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar
Rousset, Jean, L'Intérieure et l'extérieure: Essais sur la poésie et sur le théâtre du XVIIe siécle (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Rudy, Stephen, Roman Jakobson, 1896–1982: A Complete Bibliography of His Writings (Berlin, 1990).Google Scholar
Rusterholz, Peter, ‘Hermeneutik’, in Arnold, Heinz Ludwig and Simeus, Volker (eds.), Grundziüge der Literature- und Sprach-wissenschaft, vol. 1 (Munich, 1973), pp. 89–105.Google Scholar
Rutten, Franz, ‘Sur les notions de texte et de lecture dans une théorie de la réception’, Revue des Sciences Humaines, 49, no. 177 (1980), 67–83.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure ‘The modal structure of narrative universes’, Poetics Today, 6 (1985), 717–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure ‘Embedded narratives and tellability’, Style, 20 (1986), 319–40.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-LaurePossible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory (Bloomington, 1991).Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure, ‘Linguistic models in narratology’, Semiotica, 28 (1979), 127–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Michael, Marxism and Deconstruction: A Critical Articulation (Baltimore and London, 1982).Google Scholar
S/Z (1970); Eng. trans. Miller, Richard (New York, 1974, and London, 1975).Google Scholar
Sade, Fourier, Loyola (1971); Eng. trans. Miller, Richard (New York and London, 1976).Google Scholar
Said, Edward W., ‘Labyrinth of incarnations: the essays of Maurice Merleau- Ponty’, Kenyon Review, 29 (1967), 54–68.Google Scholar
Sallis, John (ed.), Deconstruction and Philosophy: The Texts of Jacques Derrida (Chicago, 1987)Google Scholar
Sangster, Rodney B., Roman Jakobson and Beyond: Language as a System of Signs (Berlin, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward, Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech (New York, 1921).Google Scholar
Sartre, J. -P., The Psychology of Imagination, trans. Frechtman, Bernard (New York, 1948, London, 1949).Google Scholar
Sartre, J. -P., Plaidoyer pour les intellectuels (1972).Google Scholar
Sartre, J. -P., What is Literature?, translated by Frechtman, Bernard (New York, 1949).Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul, Imagination, trans. Williams, F. (Ann Arbor, 1962).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand, Cours de linguistique générale, (1916) ed. Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert; critical edition prepared by Mauro, Tullio (Paris, 1972). (Pagination identical with earlier editions from the same publisher.) Cours de linguistique générale (Critical edn), ed. Engler, Rudolf, 2 vols. (Wiesbaden, 1967–1974).Google Scholar
Saussure, FerdinandCourse in General Linguistics, trans. Baskin, Wade (1959; rev. edn, Glasgow, 1974).Google Scholar
Saussure, FerdinandCourse in General Linguistics, trans. Harris, Roy (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics, trans. Baskin, Wade (revised edn, London, 1974).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics, trans. Baskin, Wade (1959; Glasgow, 1974).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics, ed. Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert in collaboration with Riedlinger, Albert, trans. Baskin, Wade (1959; rpt. Glasgow, 1974). Scholes, Robert, Protocols of Reading (New Haven, CT, 1989).Google Scholar
Schamschula, Walter, ‘Mukařovský (1891–1975)’, in Turk, Horst (ed.), Klassiker der Literaturtheorie (Munich, 1979), pp. 238–50.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Meyer, ‘On some problems in the semiotics of visual art: field and vehicle in image-signs’, Semiotica, 1 (1969) 223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, Meyer, Words and Pictures: On the Literal and the Symbolic in the Illustration of a Text (The Hague, 1973).Google Scholar
Schauber, Ellen and Spolsky, Ellen, ‘Reader, language, and character’, Bucknell Review, 26, no. 1 (1981), 33–51.Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Scénographie d‘un tableau (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Le Déluge, La peste, Paolo Uccello (Paris, 1976).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, La Lumi?ère et la proie (Paris, 1980).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Le Greco ou l‘éveil des ressemblances (Paris, 1988).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Introduction to Poetics, trans. Howard, Richard (Brighton, 1981).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Theories of the Symbol, trans. Porter, Catherine (Oxford, 1982).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, La Conquête de l'Amérique (Paris, 1982); The Conquest of America (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Scheiffele, Eberhard, ‘Wege und Aporien der “Rezeptionsästhetik.”’, Neue Rund-schau, 90 (1979), 520–41.Google Scholar
Schlaeger, Jürgen, ‘Recent German contributions to literary theory’, in Société des Anglicistes de l’nseignment Supérieur. Echanges: Actes du Congrès de Strasbourg (Paris, 1982), pp. 59–71.Google Scholar
Schläger, Ji¨rgen, ‘Applikationsverständnis der literarischen Hermeneutik’, in Fuhrmann, Manfred et al. (eds.), Text und Applikation: Theologie, Jurisprudenz und Literaturwissenschaft (Munich, 1981), pp. 577–8.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich D. E., Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts by F. D. Schleiermacher, ed. Kimmerle, Heinz, trans. Duke, James and Forstman, Jack (Missoula, 1977).Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, FriedrichHermeneutik und Kritik, ed. Frank, Manfred (Frankfurt, 1977).Google Scholar
Schlenstedt, Dieter, Wirkungsästhetische Analysen: Poetologie und Prosa in der neueren DDR-Literatur (Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar
Schmid, Herta, ‘Zum Begriff der ästhetischen Konkretisation im tschechischen Strukturalismus’, Sprache im technischen Zeitalter, 36 (1970), 290–318.Google Scholar
Schmid, Herta, ‘Der Funktionsbegriff des tschechischen Strukturalismus in der Theorie und in der literaturwisseschaftlichen Analyse am Beispiel von Havel's Horský hotel’, in Steiner, , Črvenka, and Vroon, (eds.), Structure, pp. 455–81.
Schmid, Herta, ‘Die “semantische Geste” als Schlüsselbegriff des Proger literaturwissenschaft-lichen Strukturalismus’, in Ibsch, E. (ed.), Schwerpunkte der Literaturwissenschajt (Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 209–59.Google Scholar
Schober, Rita, Abbild, Sinnbild, Wertung: Aufsätze zur Theorie und Praxis literarischer Kommunikation (Berlin, 1982).Google Scholar
Schober, Rita, ‘Rezeption und Realismus’, Weimarer Beiträge, 27, M. 1 (1982), 5–48.Google Scholar
Schober, Rita, ‘Réception et historicité de la littérature’, Revue des science humaines, 60, no. 189 (1983), 8–20.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert, Structuralism in Literature: An Introduction (New Haven, 1974).Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert, ‘Cognition and the implied reader’, Diacritics, 5, no. 3 (1975), 13–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, Robert, ‘Deconstruction and communication’, Critical Inquiry, 14 (1988), 278–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Ulrich, Rettende Kritik und antizipierte Utopie. Zur geschichtlichen Gehalt-ästhetischen Erfahrung in den Theorien von J an Mukařovský, Walter Benjamin und Theodor W. Adorno (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
Schweickart, Patrocinio P., ‘Reading ourselves: toward a feminist theory of reading,’ in Flynn, Elizabeth A. and Schweickart, Patrocinio P. (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986), pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
Scuriau, Etienne, Les deux cent mille situations dramatiques (Paris, 1950).Google Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘Reiterating the differences: a reply to Derrida’, Glyph, 2 (1977), 198–208.Google Scholar
Searle, John ‘The world turned upside down’, New York Review of Books, 27 October 1983, PP. 73–9.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts,’ Philosophical Review, 77 (1968), 405–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, JohnSpeech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John ‘Reiterating the differences: a reply to Derrida’, Glyph 1 (1977), 198–208.Google Scholar
Searle, JohnExpression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (Cambridge, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John ‘The word turned upside down’, New York Review of Books, 27 October 1983, 74–9.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A., ‘Karl Bühler: a neglected figure in the history of semiotic inquiry’, in The Play of Musement (Bloomington, 1981), pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, 13 vols. (The Hague, 1963–1976).Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in Language (Cambridge, MA, 1960).Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas, ‘The semiotic web: a chronicle of prejudices’, Bulletin of Literary Semiotics, 2 (1975), 1–65; 3 (1975), 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segers, Rien T., ‘Readers, text and author: some implications of Rezeptions as thetik’, Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature, 24 (1975), 15–24.Google Scholar
Segers, Rien ‘An interview with Hans Robert Jauss’, New Literary History, 11 (1979), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segers, Rien ‘La Determination idéologique du lecteur: A Propos de la nécessité de la collaboration entre la sémiotique et l'esthétique de la réception’, Degrés, 24–25 (1980–1981), h1–h14.Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare, Semiotics and Literary Criticism (The Hague, 1973).Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare, Analysis of the Literary Text (Bloomington, 1988).Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare, Structure and Time: Narration, Poetry, Models, trans. Meddemmen, John (Chicago, 1979).Google Scholar
Selden, Raman, Criticism and Objectivity (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid, Science and Metaphysics (London, 1968).Google Scholar
Man, Paul, ‘Semiology and Rhetoric’, in Harari, Josue V. (ed.), Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-structuralist Criticism (London, 1980), pp. 121–40.Google Scholar
Seung, T. K., Semiotics and Thematics in Hermeneutics (New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Seung, T. K., Structuralism and Hermeneutics (New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Seyffert, Peter, Soviet Literary Structuralism: Background–Debate–Issues (Columbus, OH, 1985).Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude F., and Weaver, Warren, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (Urbana, 1949).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Gary, and Alan, Sica (eds.), Hermeneutics: Questions and Prospects (Amherst, 1984).Google Scholar
Shechner, Mark, review of Subjective Criticism by Bleich, David, Criticism, 21 (1979), p. 153
Shklovsky, Viktor, Voskresenie slova (Petersburg, 1914).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, ‘Zaumnyj jazyk i poezija’, Sborniki po teorii po`tičeskogo jazyka. I (Petersburg, 1916).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, ‘Evgeni Onegin: Puskin i Sterr’, in Ocerki po poetike Puskina (Berlin, 1923).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, O teorii prozy (Moscow, 1925; 2nd enlarged edn, Moscow, 1929).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, Tret'ja fabrika (Moscow, 1926).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, Technika pisatel'skogo remesla (Moscow-Leningrad, 1927).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, Gamburgskij scet (Moscow, 1928).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, Schriften zum Film, trans. Kämpfe, A. (Frankfurt, 1966).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, Theorie der Prosa, trans. Drohla, G. (Frankfurt, 1966).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, Sur la théorie de la prose, trans. Verret, G. (Lausanne, 1973).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, Theory of Prose, trans. Sher, B. (Elmwood Park, IL, 1990).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, O teoriiprozy [On the theory of prose], 2nd edn (Moscow, 1929).Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, ‘Art as technique’, in Lemon, Lee T. and Reis, Marion J. (eds.), Russian Formalist Criticism (Lincoln, NE, 1965), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor, ‘Sterne's Tristram Shandy: stylistic commentary’, in Lemon, and Reis, (eds.), Russian Formalist Criticism, pp. 25–57.
Shpet, Gustav, Esteticeskie fragmenty, vols. 1–3 (Petersburg, 1922–3).Google Scholar
Shukman, Ann, and O'Toole, L. M. (eds.), Formalist Theory (Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
Shukman, Ann, Formalism: History, Comparison, Genre (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar
Shukman, Ann, ‘Lotman: the dialectic of a semiotician’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.), The Sign, pp. 194–206.
Silverman, Hugh J., (ed.) Derrida and Deconstruction (New York and London, 1989).Google Scholar
Silverman, Hugh J., and Ihde, Don (eds.), Hermeneutics and Deconstruction (Albany, NY, 1985).Google Scholar
Silverman, Hugh J. (ed.), Gadamer and Hermeneutics (New York and London, 1991).Google Scholar
Silverman, Hugh J., and Ihde, Don, Hermeneutics and Deconstruction (Albany, 1985).Google Scholar
Simon, John K. (ed.), Modern French Criticism: From Proust and Valeéy to Structuralism (Chicago, 1972).Google Scholar
Simons, Peter M., ‘The formalization of Husserl's theory of wholes and parts’, in Smith, (ed.), Parts, pp. 113–59
Singleton, Charles S. (ed.), Interpretation: Theory and Praxis (Baltimore, 1969).Google Scholar
Skalička, Vladimiír, ‘Kodaňský strukturalismus a “Pražská sǩola'” [Copenhagen Structuralism and the ‘Prague School'], Slovo a slovesnost, 10 (1947/1948), 135–42.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Motives, intentions, and the interpretation of texts’, New Literary History, 3 (1971–1972), 321–42.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Hermeneutics and the role of history’, New Literary History, 7 (1975), 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Motives, intentions and the interpretation of texts’, New Literary History, 3 (1972), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Hermeneutics and the role of history’, New Literary History, 7 (1975), 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatoff, Walter, With Respect to Readers: Dimensions of Literary Response (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar
Slawiński, Janusz, Literatur als System und Prozess (Munich, 1975).Google Scholar
Smith, Barry (ed.), Structure and Gestalt: Philosophy and Literature in Austria-Hungary and Her Successor States (Amsterdam, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, BarryParts and Moments. Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. (Munich, 1982)Google Scholar
Smith, Barry, and Mulligan, Kevin, ‘Pieces of a theory’, in Smith, (ed.), Parts, pp. 15–109.
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein, ‘Narrative versions, narrative theories’, in Mitchell, W. J. T. (ed.), On Narrative (Chicago, 1981), pp. 209–32.Google Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein, Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory (Cambridge, MA, 1988), pp. 116–24 (a section called ‘Changing places: truth, error and deconstruction’).Google Scholar
Smith, Roch Charles, Gaston Bachelard (Boston, 1982).Google Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein, On the Margins of Discourse: The Relation of Literature to Language (Chicago, 1978).Google Scholar
Sollers, Philippe, ‘Ecriture et éevolution’, in Tel Quel: Théorie d'ensemble (Paris, 1968), pp. 67–79.Google Scholar
Sollers é'crivain (1979); Sollers Writer trans. Thody, Philip (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Solms, Wilhelm, and Schöll, Norbert, ‘Rezeptions as thetik’, in Nemec, Friedrich and Solms, Wilhlem (eds.) Literaturwissenschaft heute (Munich, 1979), 154–96.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A., Some Aspects of Text Grammars: A Study in Theoretical Linguistics and Poetics (The Hague, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T., Some Aspects of Text-Grammars (The Hague, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, Dietrich et al. (eds.), Funktion und Wirkung: Soziologische Untersuchungen zur Literatur und Kunst (Berlin, 1978).Google Scholar
Sommer, Dietrich (ed.), Probleme der Kunstwirkung (Halle, 1979).Google Scholar
Sommer, Dietrich (ed.), Leseerfahrung, Lebenserfahrung (Berlin, 1983).Google Scholar
Sosnocki, James Joseph, review of Fish et al, Modern Fiction Studies, 27 (1981), 753–58.
Souriau, Etienne, Les deux cent mille situations dramatiques (1950).Google Scholar
Spanos, William V., Martin Heidegger and the Question of Literature: Towards a Postmodern Literary Hermeneutics (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar
Spanos, William ‘Towards a fallen poetics: talking on the measure of occasion’, in Wellman, Don (ed.), Coherence (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 201–8.Google Scholar
Spanos, William V., Martin Heidegger and the Question of Literature (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert, The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, 3rd rev. edn (The Hague, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert, Les Temps Modernes, 17 (1961), 193–43 [issue on Merleau-Ponty].Google Scholar
Spillner, Bern, Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft. Stilforschung, Rhetorik, Textlinguistik (Stuttgart, 1974).Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics (New York and London, 1987).Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri, ‘The letter as cutting edge’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 208–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stampe, Dennis W., ‘Meaning and truth in the theory of speech acts’, in Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Volume III: Speech Acts (New York, 1975), pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward, ‘Structural poetics and linguistics’, in Sebeok, (ed.), Trends, XII, pp. 629–59.
Stankiewicz, Edward, ‘Roman Jakobson: teacher and scholar’, in A Tribute to Roman Jakob son, 1896–1982 (Berlin, 1983), pp. 17–26.Google Scholar
Stanton, Martin, Lacan and French Styles of Psychoanalysis (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Stanzel, Franz K., Die typischen Erzählsituationen im Roman daroestellt an ‘Tom Jones’, ‘Moby Dick’, ‘The Ambassadors’, ‘Ulysses’ (Vienna, 1955).Google Scholar
Stanzel, FranzA Theory of Narrative, trans. Goedsche, Charlotte (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, Les mots sous les mots: Les anagrammes de Ferdinand de Saussure (1964).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: la transparence et l'obstacle (Paris, 1957); Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Chicago, 1988).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, L'Oeil vivant (Paris, 1961).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, La Relation critique: L'Oeil vivant 2 (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, ‘Consideration on the present state of literary criticism’, Diogenes, 74 (1971), 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, ‘On the fundamental gestures of criticism’, New Literary History, 5 (1974), 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, ‘Criticism and authority’, Daedalus, 106, no. 4 (1977), 1–16.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, Montaigne en mouvement (Paris, 1982); Montaigne in Motion, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Chicago, 1985).Google Scholar
Staten, Henry, Wittgenstein and Derrida (Lincoln, NE, 1984).Google Scholar
Steig, Michael, Stories of Reading: Subjectivity and Literary Understanding (Baltimore, 1989).Google Scholar
Stein, Nancy L., ‘The definition of a story’, Journal of Pragmatics, 6 (1982), 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Peter, Russian Formalism: A Metapoetics (Ithaca, NY, 1984).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter (ed.), The Prague School. Selected Writings, 1929–1946 (Austin, 1982).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter and Burbank, John (eds. and trans.), The Word and Verbal Art. Selected Essays by Jan Mukaíovský (New Haven, 1977).Google Scholar
Steiner, PeterStructure, Sign and Function. Selected Essays by Jan Mukařovský (New Haven, 1978).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter ‘Theèses présentées au Premier Congrès des philologues slaves’, in Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, I (Prague, 1929), 7–29; Eng. trans, in Steiner, (ed.), Prague School3–31.Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter, ‘The conceptual basis of Prague structuralism’, in Matejka, (ed.), Sound, pp. 351–85.
Steiner, Peter, Russian Formalism. A Metapoetics (Ithaca, 1984).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter, Červenka, M. and Vroon, R. (eds.), The Structure of the Literary Process.CrossRef
Steiner, Peter, Studies Dedicated to the Memory of Felix Vodička (Amsterdam, 1982).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter, and Wendy Steiner, ‘The axes of poetic language’, in Odmark, (ed.), Language, pp. 35–70.
Steiner, Wendy, ‘Modern American semiotics’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.), The Sign, pp. 99–118.
Steiner, Wendy, Pictures of Romance: Form against Context in Painting and Literature (Chicago, 1988).Google Scholar
Steinmann, Martin Jr., ‘Perlocutionary acts and the interpretation of literature,’ Centrum, 3 (1975), 112–16.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, Horst, ‘Rezeption und Interpretation: Versuch einer Abgrenzung’, Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik, 3 (1974), 37–81.Google Scholar
Stempel, W. -D., and Striedter, Jurij (eds.), Texte der rusischen Formalisten, vols. 1 and 2 (Munich, 1969 and 1972).Google Scholar
Stempel, Wolf-Dieter, Gestalt, Ganzheit, Struktur. Aus Vor- und Frühgeschichte des Strukturalismus in Deutschland (Göttingen, 1978).Google Scholar
Stempel, Wolf-Dieter, ‘Aspects Génériques de la réception’, Poétique, 39 (1979), 353–62.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Meir, Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction (Baltimore, 1978)Google Scholar
Stiebel, Arlene, ‘But is it life? some thoughts on modern critical theory’, Modern Language Studies, 14, no. 3 (1984), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stierle, Karlheinz, ‘Für eine öffnung des hermeneutischen Zirkels’, Poetica, 17 (1985), 340–54.Google Scholar
Stierle, Karlheinz, Text als Handlung: Perspektiven einer systematischen Literaturwissen- schaft (Munich, 1975).Google Scholar
Stierle, Karlheinz, ‘The reading of fictional texts’, in Suleiman, Susan R. and Crosman, Inge (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 83–105.Google Scholar
Stone, Jennifer: ‘The horrors of power: a critique of Kristeva’, in The Politics of Theory, ed. Barker, F. et al. (Colchester, 1983), pp. 38–48.Google Scholar
Stout, Jeffrey, ‘What is the meaning of a text?’, New Literary History 14 (1982), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, Jeffrey, ‘The relativity of interpretation’, The Monist, 69 (1986), 103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, Barrie Ruth, ‘Women's words as weapons: speech as action in “The Wife's Lament'”, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 23 (1981), 268–85.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. ‘Intention and convention in speech acts’, Philosophical Review, 73 (1964), 439–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striedter, Jurij, ‘Einleitung’ to Vodička, Felix, Die Struktur der literarischen Entwick-lung, ed. Boldt, Frank et al. (Munich, 1976), pp. vii–ciii.Google Scholar
Striedter, Jurij, Literary Structure, Evolution, and Value: Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism Reconsidered (Cambridge, MA, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studien zur Entwicklung einer materialen Hermeneutik (Munich, 1979).
Sturrock, John (ed.), Structuralism and Since: From Lévi-Strauss to Derrida (Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar
Peer, Willie, Stylistics and Psychology. Investigations in Foregroundingi (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan R., ‘Reading Robbe-Grillet: sadism and text in Projet pour une revolution à New York’, Romanic Review, 68 (1977), 43–62.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan ‘Redundancy and the “readable” text’, Poetics Today, 1 (1979), 119–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, Susan, R. and Crosman, Inge, eds., The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Robert R., Political Hermeneutics: The Early Thinking of Hans-Georg Gadamer (University Park, 1989).Google Scholar
Sur la littérature (dialogue with Maurice Nadeau) (Grenoble, 1980).
Sur Racine (1963); On Racine, trans. Howard, Richard (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
Sus, Oleg, ‘On the genetic preconditions of Czech structuralist semiology and semantics. An essay on Czech and German thought’, Poetics, 4 (1972), 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, Herbert L. (ed.), At the Boundaries (Boston, 1984).Google Scholar
Svejkovsý, F., ‘Theoretical poetics in the twentieth century’, in Sebeok, (ed.), Trends, XII, pp. 863–941.
Szondi, Peter, Einfuhrung in die literarische Hermeneutik, ed. Bollack, Jean and Stierlin, Helen (Frankfurt, 1975).Google Scholar
Szondi, Peter, On Textual Understanding and Other Essays, trans. Mendelsohn, Harvey, Theory and History of Literature 15 (Manchester, 1986).Google Scholar
Tanner, Tony, Adultery in the Novel: Contract and Transgression (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
Tanner, Tony, Tel Quel, Théorie d'ensemble (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Taylor, Mark C. (ed.), Deconstruction in Context: Literature and Philosophy (Chicago, 1986).Google Scholar
Tel Quel, 47 (Autumn 1971).
Tesniere, Lucien, Eléments de syntaxe structurale (1959).Google Scholar
Man, Paul, The Resistance to Theory (Minneapolis, 1986).Google Scholar
Therrien, Vincent, La Révolution de Gaston Bachelard en critique littéaire (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Thody, P., Roland Barthes: A Conservative Estimate (London, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Brook, ‘Reading Wolfgang Iser or responding to a theory of response’, Comparative Literature Studies, 19 (1982), 54–66.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B., Critical Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jiürgen Habermas (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiefenbrun, Susan W., ‘The state of literary semiotics: 1983’, Semiotica, 51 (1984), 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, Yishai (ed.), The Prague School and its Legacy (Amsterdam, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan (ed.), Theorie de la litterature (Paris, 1965).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, La poétique de la prose (Paris, 1971); The Poetics of Prose, trans. Howard, Richard (Ithaca, 1977).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Qu'est-ce que le structuralisme: Poétique (Paris, 1968); Introduction to Poetics, trans. Howard, Richard (Minneapolis, 1981).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, ‘The birth of occidental semiotics’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.), The Sign, pp. 1–42.
Todorov, Tzvetan (ed.), French Literary Theory Today (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, ‘Les catégories du récit littéraire’, Communications, 8 (1966), 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Littérature et signification (Paris, 1967).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Grammaire du Décaméron (The Hague, 1969).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, ‘Les transformations narratives’, Poétique, 3 (1970), 322–33.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Poétique de la prose (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Poétique (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan (ed.), Théorie de la littérature, textes des formalistes russes (Paris, 1965).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Symbolism and Interpretation (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
Toman, Jindřrich, ‘A marvellous chemical laboratory …. and its deeper meaning: notes on Roman Jakobson and the Czech avant-garde between the two wars’, in Pomorska, et al. (eds.), Language, pp. 313–46.
Tomashevsky, Boris, ‘Literatura i biografija’, Kniga i revoljucija, 4 (1923).6–9.Google Scholar
Tomashevsky, Boris, Russkoe stichoslozenie:Metrika (Petersburg, 1923).Google Scholar
Tomashevsky, Boris, Teorija literatury:Poetika (Moscow-Leningrad, 1925).Google Scholar
Tomashevsky, Boris, O stiche: Stat'i (Leningrad, 1929).Google Scholar
Tomashevsky, Boris, Teorija literatury. Po`tika [Theory of Literature. Poetics], 4th edn (Moscow, 1928).Google Scholar
Tomashevsky, Boris, ‘Thematics’, in Lemon, Lee T. and Reis, Marion J. (eds.), Russian Formalist Criticism (Lincoln, 1965), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Tompkins, Jane P., ‘An introduction to reader-response criticism’, in Tompkins, Jane P. (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980), pp. ix–xxvi.Google Scholar
Tompkins, JaneSensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction 1790–1860 (New York, 1985).Google Scholar
Tompkins, Jane P. (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980).Google Scholar
Trager, George L., and Smith, Henry Lee, An Outline of English Structure (Washington, 1957).Google Scholar
Trnka, Bohumil, ‘Linguistics and the ideological structure of the period’, qtd. from Eng. trans, in Vachek, The Linguistic School of Prague (Bloomington, 1966), pp. 152–65.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S., Principles of Phonology, trans. Baltaxe, C. A. M. (Berkeley, 1969).Google Scholar
Turk, Horst, ‘Wahrheit oder Methode? H. G. Gadamers “Grundziüge einer Philosophischen Hermeneutik”’, in Birus, Hendirk (ed.), Hermeneutische Positionen (Göttingen, 1982).Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry, Psychoanalytical Politics: Freud's French Revolution (London, 1978).Google Scholar
Tynyanov, Juri, Problema stichotvornogo jazyka (Leningrad, 1924).Google Scholar
Tynyanov, Juri, ‘Ob osnovach kino’, in Poetika kino (Moscow-Leningrad, 1927).Google Scholar
Tynyanov, Juri, Archaisty i novatory (Leningrad, 1929).Google Scholar
Tynyanov, Juri and Jakobson, Roman, ‘Problemy izucenija literatury i jazyka’, Novyj Lef 12 (1928), 35–7.Google Scholar
Tynyanov, Juri, Die literarischen Kunstmittel und die Evolution der Literatur, trans. Kaämpfe, A. (Frankfurt, 1967).Google Scholar
Tynyanov, Juri, Das Problem der Verssprache: Zur Semantik des poetischen Textes, trans. Paulmann, I. (Munich, 1977).Google Scholar
Tynyanov, Juri, The Problem of Verse Language, trans. Sosa, M. and Harvey, B. (Ann Arbor, MI, 1981).Google Scholar
Ungar, S., Roland Barthes: The Professor of Desire (Lincoln, NB and London, 1983).Google Scholar
Uspensky, Boris, A Poetics of Composition: The Structure of the Artistic Text and Typology of a Compositional Form, trans. Zavarin, Valentina and Wittig, Susan (Berkeley, 1973).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef and Dusšková, Libuše (eds.), Praguiana. Some Basic and Less Known Aspects of the Prague Linguistics (Amsterdam, 1983).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef (ed.), A Prague School Reader in Linguistics (Bloomington, 1964).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef, Dictionnaire de linguistique de I'Ecole de Prague (Utrecht, 1960).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef, The Linguistic School of Prague (Bloomington, 1966).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef, ‘Karl Bühler und die Prager Linguistenschule’, in Eschbach, (ed.), Bühler-Studien, II, pp. 247–53.
Valdes, Mario J., Phenomenological Hermeneutics and the Study of Literature (Toronto, 1987).Google Scholar
Valdés, Mario J., Shadows in the Cave: A Phenomenological Approach to Literary Criticism Based on Hispanic Texts (Toronto, 1982).Google Scholar
Valdés, Mario J.Phenomenological Hermeneutic and the Study of Literature (Toronto, 1987).Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard L. ‘Gadamer and Kant: the critique of modern aesthetic consciousness’, Interpretation, 9 (1981), 353–64.Google Scholar
Veltruský, Jiří, ‘Jan Mukařfovský;'s structural poetics and aesthetics’, Poetics Today, 2 (1980/1981), 117–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Man, Paul, ‘Vérité et méthode dans l'oeuvre de George Poulet’, Critique, 25 (1969), 608–23.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, Viktor, O poezii Anny Achmatovoj: Stilisticeskie nabroski (Leningrad, 1925).Google Scholar
Vinogradov, Viktor, Gogol’ i natural'naja skola (Leningrad, 1925).Google Scholar
Vinogradov, Viktor, Etjudy O stile Gogolja (Leningrad, 1926).Google Scholar
Vinogradov, Viktor, Evoljucija russkogo naturalizma: Gogo'-Dostoevskij (Leningrad, 1929).Google Scholar
Vinokur, Grigori, ‘Poetika, lingvistika, sociologija: Metodologiceskaja spravka’, Lef 3 (1923), 104–13.Google Scholar
Vinokur, Grigori, Kul'tura jazyka (Moscow, 1925).Google Scholar
Vinokur, Grigori, Biografija i kul'tura (Moscow, 1927).Google Scholar
Dijk, T., Visible language, 11, no. 4 (1977).
Vitoux, Pierre, ‘Le jeu de la focalisation’, Poétique, 51 (1982), 359–68.Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, ‘Problematika ohlasu Nerudova dila’ [Problems of the echo of Neruda's work] (1941), Struktura, 193–219; Eng. trans, in Steiner, (ed.), Prague School103–34.Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, ‘Literární historic Její problémy a úkoly’ [Literary history. Its problems and tasks] (1942), Struktura, 13–53; Eng. trans, (part) in Matejka, and Titunik, (eds.), Semiotics, 197–208.Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, Počátky krásné prózy novocěeské [The beginnings of Czech artistic prose] (Prague, 1948).Google Scholar
Vodička, Felix, Structura vývoje (Prague, 1969).Google Scholar
Vodiˇka, Felix, ‘The integrity of the literary process: notes on the development of theoretical thought in J. Mukřfovský's work’, Poetics, 4 (1972), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volek, Emil, Metastructuralismo. Poética moderna, semiotica narrativa y filosojia de las ciencias sociales (Madrid, 1985).Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N. (attributed to Bakhtin, M.), Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. Matejka, Ladislaw and Titunik, I. R. (Cambridge, MA, 1986).Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N.Freudianism: A Critical Sketch, trans. Titunik, I. R. (Bloomington, IN, 1987).Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N., Marksizm i jilosofija jazyka:Osnovnye problemy sociologičeskogo metoda v nauke ojazyke (Leningrad, 1929); Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. Matejka, Ladislav and Titunik, I. R. (New York, 1973).Google Scholar
Wach, Joachim, Das Verstehen: Grundziüge einer Geschichte der nermeneutischen Theorie im 19. Jahrhundert, 3 vols. (Tübingen, 1926ü1933).Google Scholar
Wagner, Irmgard, ‘Hans Robert Jauβ and Classicity’, Modern Language Notes, 99 (1984), 1173–84.Google Scholar
Waldmann, Gü;nter, Kommunikations ästhetik I: Die Ideologie der Erzähl form (Munich, 1976).Google Scholar
Walsh, Dorothy, ‘Literary art and linguistic meaning’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 12 (1972). 32l–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warhol, Robyn R., Gendered Interventions: Narrative Discourse in the Victorian Novel (New Brunswick, 1989).Google Scholar
Warning, Rainer (ed.), Rezeption s äs thetik: Theorie und Praxis (Munich, 1975).Google Scholar
Warning, Rainer, ‘Rezeptionsästhetik als literaturwissenschaftliche Pragamatik’, in Warning, Rainer (ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik: Theorie und Praxis (Munich, 1975), pp. 9–41.Google Scholar
Warnke, Georgia, Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Wasserman, G. R., Roland Barthes (Boston, 1981).Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R., ‘The poetic function and the nature of language’, in Pomorska, Krystyna and Rudy, Stephen (eds.), Roman Jakobson. Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time (Minneapolis, 1985), pp. 143–68.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R., Roman Jakob son's Science of Language (Lisse, 1976).Google Scholar
Weber, Samuel, ‘Saussure and the apparition oflanguage: the critical perspective’, Modern Language Notes, 91 (1976), 913–38.Google Scholar
Weber, Samuel, ‘Caught in the act of reading’, in Weber, Samuel (ed.), Demarcating the Disciplines: Philosophy Literature Art, Glyph Textual Studies 1 (Minneapolis, 1986), pp. 181–214.Google Scholar
Weber, Samuel, ‘The debt of criticism: notes on Stanley Fish's Is There a Text in This Class?’, in Institution and Interpretation [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 31] (Minneapolis, 1987), pp. 33–9.Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert, ‘"Reception aesthetics” and the crisis of literary history’, Clio, 5 (1975), 3–33.Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert, ‘"Rezeption sästhetik” oder das Ungenügen an der bürgerlichen Bildung: Zur Kritik einer Theorie literarischer Kommunikation’, in Kunstensemble und Öffentlichkeit (Halle-Leipzig, 1982), pp. 85–133.Google Scholar
Weimar, Klaus, Historische Einleitung zur literaturwissenschaftlichen Hermeneutik (Tuübingen, 1975).Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harald, Tempus, Besprochene und Erzählte Welt (Stuttgart, 1964).Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harald, ‘Für eine Literaturgeschichte des Lesers’, Merkur, 21 (1967), 1026–38.Google Scholar
Weinsheimer, Joel C., ‘"London” and the fundamental problem of hermeneutics’, Critical Inquiry, 9 (1982), 303–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinsheimer, Joel C.Gadamer's Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method (New Haven, 1985).Google Scholar
Weinsheimer, Joel C.Philosophical Hermeneutics and Literary Theory (New Haven, 1991).Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, L. (ed.), Thought without Language (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Wellek, René, A History of Modern Criticism 1750–1950, vol 7 (New Haven, 1991).Google Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘The theory of literary history’, in Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, VI (Prague, 1936), 173–91.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, The Literary Theory and Aesthetics of the Prague School (Ann Arbor, MI, 1969), rpt. in Discriminations: Further Concepts of Criticism (New Haven, 1970), pp. 275–303.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Samuel C. III, ‘The extension of deconstruction’, The Monist, 69 (1986), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Samuel ‘Indeterminacy of French interpretation: Derrida and Davidson’, in LePore, Ernest (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford, 1986), pp. 477–94.Google Scholar
White, Hayden, ‘The historical text as a literary artifact’, Clio, 3 (1974), 277–303.Google Scholar
White, Hayden, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore, 1986).Google Scholar
Whiteside, A., and Issacharoff, M. (eds.), On Referring in Literature (Bloomington, 1987).Google Scholar
Wilson, Edmund, ‘The ambiguity of Henry James’, in The Triple Thinkers (Harmondsworth, 1962), pp. 102–50.Google Scholar
Wilson, Barrie A. (ed.) About Interpretation. From Plato to Dilthey: A Hermeneutic Anthology (New York, 1989).Google Scholar
Wimmers, Inge Crosman, Poetics of Reading: Approaches to the Novel (Princeton, 1988).Google Scholar
Winner, Thomas G., ‘The creative personality as viewed by the Prague linguistic circle: theories and implications’, in Matejka, L. (ed.), American Contributions to the Seventh International Congress of Slavists, I - Linguistics and Poetics (The Hague, 1973), pp. 361–76.Google Scholar
Winner, Thomas ‘Roman Jakobson and avant-garde art’, in Armstrong, and Schooneveld, (eds.), Roman Jakobson, pp. 503–14.
Winner, Thomas ‘Jan Mukařfovský: the beginnings of structural and semiotic aesthetics’, in Matejka, (ed.), Sound, pp. 433–55.
Winner, Thomas G., ‘On the relation of verbal and non-verbal art in early Prague semiotics: Jan Mukařrovsǩy’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.), The Sign, pp. 227–37.
Wiseman, M. B., The Ecstasies of Roland Barthes (New York and London, 1989).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, 3rd. edn, trans. Anscombe, G.E.M. (New York, 1958).Google Scholar
Wolff, Janet, Hermeneutic Philosophy and the Sociology of Art (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Wolff, Erwin, ‘Der intendierte Leser: Überlegungen und Beispiele eines literatur wissenschaftlichen Begriffs’, Poetica, 4 (1971), 141–66.Google Scholar
Wollen, Peter, Signs and Meaning in the Cinema (London, 1969).Google Scholar
Wollen, Peter, Readings and Writings: Semiotic Counter-strategies (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard, ‘The professor knows’, Review of Is There a Text in This Class? by Fish, Stanley, New York Review of Books, 28 (17 December 1981), 64–6.Google Scholar
Wood, David, Derrida: A Critical Reader (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha, ‘Speech-act theory and the perpetuation of the dogma of literary autonomy’, Centrum, 6 (1978), 75–89.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, Ann, ‘Lacanalysis: Lacan for critics’, Oxford Literary Review, 2 (1978), 7–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Elizabeth, Psychoanalytic Criticism: Theory in Practice (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Wright, Edmond, ‘Derrida, Searle, contexts, games, riddles’, New Literary History, 13 (1982), 463–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Robert (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post–Structuralist Reader (London, 1981).Google Scholar
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, ‘Phänomenologie und Herme- neutik’, no. 5, Heft 17 (1975).
Zeltner, Hermann, ‘Moritz Geiger zum Gedachtnis’, Zeitschrift füosophische orschung, 7 (1960), 452–66.Google Scholar
Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Kompozicija liriceskich stichotvorenij (Petersburg, 1921).Google Scholar
Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Rifma, ee istorija i teorija (Petersburg, 1923).Google Scholar
Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Bajron i Puskin: Iz istorii romanticeskoj poemy (Leningrad, 1924).Google Scholar
Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Vvedenie v metriku: Teorija sticha (Leningrad, 1925).Google Scholar
Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Voprosy literatury: Stat'i 1916–1926 (Leningrad, 1928).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Bernhard, ‘Der Leser als Produzent: Zur Problematik der rezeptionsästhetischen Methode’, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 4 (1974), 12–26.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Bernhard, Literaturrezeption im historischen Prozeβ: Zur Theorie einer Rezeptionsgeschichte der Literatur (Munich, 1977).Google Scholar
Zirmunsky, Viktor, Introduction to Metrics, trans. Brown, C. F. (The Hague, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žmegač, Viktor and Škreb, Zdenko (eds.), Zur Kritik literaturwissenschaftlicher Methodologie (Frankfurt-on-Main, 1973).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Raman Selden
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Raman Selden
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Raman Selden
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.016
Available formats
×