The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- I Medieval philosophical literature
- II Aristotle in the middle ages
- III The old logic
- IV Logic in the high middle ages: semantic theory
- V Logic in the high middle ages: propositions and modalities
- 14 Topics: their development and absorption into consequences
- 15 Consequences
- 16 Obligations
- 17 Modal logic
- 18 Future contingents
- VI Metaphysics and epistemology
- VII Natural philosophy
- VIII Philosophy of mind and action
- IX Ethics
- X Politics
- XI The defeat, neglect, and revival of scholasticism
- Index nominum
- Index rerum
- References
14 - Topics: their development and absorption into consequences
from V - Logic in the high middle ages: propositions and modalities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- I Medieval philosophical literature
- II Aristotle in the middle ages
- III The old logic
- IV Logic in the high middle ages: semantic theory
- V Logic in the high middle ages: propositions and modalities
- 14 Topics: their development and absorption into consequences
- 15 Consequences
- 16 Obligations
- 17 Modal logic
- 18 Future contingents
- VI Metaphysics and epistemology
- VII Natural philosophy
- VIII Philosophy of mind and action
- IX Ethics
- X Politics
- XI The defeat, neglect, and revival of scholasticism
- Index nominum
- Index rerum
- References
Summary
From Aristotle through Boethius to scholasticism
‘Topic’ is the infelicitous but by now standard translation for the Latin technical term ‘locus’, designating a logical concept variously understood throughout ancient and medieval philosophy. The medieval tradition of the Topics has its roots in Aristotle's Topics. In that book, Aristotle's purpose is to present an art of arguing, more precisely the art of dialectical disputation or Socratic arguing; and most of the book is devoted to a method for the discovery of arguments. The main instrument of this method is a Topic, by which Aristotle understands primarily a strategy of argumentation (such as, ‘If the species is a relative, [one must] examine whether the genus is also a relative’) and secondarily a principle confirming the line of argument produced by the strategy (for example, ‘If the species is a relative, the genus is also’). Six of the eight books of the Topics consist largely in a loosely ordered compilation of such strategies and principles.
Aristotle considers these Topics part of dialectic and distinguishes them from two different but analogous sorts of Topics, rhetorical Topics (which aid in the construction of rhetorical arguments) and mnemonic Topics (which aid in recalling things committed to memory).
Topics received considerable attention in later antiquity from the Greek commentators on Aristotle and from Latin rhetoricians, including Cicero, who wrote his own treatise (Topica) on dialectical Topics. In the course of their work, the discipline of the Topics changed until by Boethius' time it has become very different from Aristole's art of Topics, particularly in its understanding of the nature of a Topic.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Later Medieval PhilosophyFrom the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600, pp. 271 - 299Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1982
References
(1973) ‘Did Ockham Know of Material and Strict Implication? A Reconsideration’, Franciscan Studies 33:.Google Scholar
(1891). In Aristotelis Topicorum libros octo commentaria, ed. (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, II, 2), ReimerGoogle Scholar
(1954). Rhetorica ad Herennium, tr. (Loeb Classical Library), Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
(1952). ‘Die Lehre von den Konsequenzen bei Pseudo-Scotus’, Franziska-nische Studien 34:.Google Scholar
(1959). ‘The logical interest of the topics as seen in Abelard’, The Modern Schoolman, 37:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1960). ‘The Formalizing of Topics in Mediaeval Logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 1:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1961). ‘Topic and Consequence in Ockham's Logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962a). ‘The Tradition of the Logical Topics: Aristotle to Ockham’, Journal of the History of Ideas 23:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1952). Medieval Logic: An Outline of Its Development from 1250–c. 1400, Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
(1976). Quaestiones super librum Topicorum, ed. and (Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi VI, 1), GadGoogle Scholar
(1962). ‘A Study in Burleigh: Tractatus de Regulis Generalibus Consequentiarum’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 2:Google Scholar
(1963a). ‘Burleigh: On Conditional Hypothetical Propositions’, Franciscan Studies 23:.Google Scholar
(1963b). ‘Walter Burleigh's Hypothetical Syllogistic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 4:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1964). ‘An Examination of Some Proofs in Burleigh's Propositional Logic’, The New Scholasticism 38:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976). Le antinomie semantiche nella logica medievale (Pubblicazioni dell' Istituto di Storia della Filosofia e del Centro per Ricerche di Filosofia Medioevale, n.s. 23), Antenore.Google Scholar
(1979) De 13de eeuwse Tractaten over syncategorematische Termen (Deel I: Inleidende studie; Deel II: Uitgave van Nicolaas van Parijs' Sincategoreumata), Krips Repro MeppelGoogle Scholar
ed. (1977a). Incertorum auctorum Quaestiones super Sophisticos Elenchos (Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi, 7), GadGoogle Scholar
(1958–9). ‘The Theory of Assertoric Consequence in Albert of Saxony’, Franciscan Studies 18:. and 19:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1937). Bearbeitungen und Auslegungen der aristotelischen Logik aus der Zeit von Peter Abaelard bis Petrus Hispanus. Mitteilungen aus Handschriften deutscher Bibliotheken (Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist. Klasse, 5)Google Scholar
(1974). ‘William of Champeaux on Boethius' Topics according to Orleans Bibl. Mun. 266’, CIMACL 13:Google Scholar
(1976). ‘The Summulae of John Buridan, Tractatus VI De locis’, in (ed.) The Logic of John Buridan, Museum TusculanumGoogle Scholar
(1977a). ‘Discussions about the Status of the Loci Dialectici in Works from the Middle of the 13th Century,’ CIMACL 20:Google Scholar
(1977b). ‘The Doctrine of “maxima propositio” and “locus differentia” in Commentaries from the 12th Century on Boethius’ “Topics”’, Studia Medie-wistyczne 18:Google Scholar
(1911). Isidori Hispalensis episcopi Etymologiarum sive Originum libri xx, ed. , Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
(1971). Logica (Summa Lamberti), ed. (Pubblicazioni della facoltà di lettere e filosofta dell'Università di Milano, 59), La Nuova Italia EditriceGoogle Scholar
(1968). ‘Les questions de Jean Buridan sur les Topiques d'Aristote’,, Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 13:Google Scholar
(1972). ‘Notes on the Assertoric and Modal Propositional Logic of the Pseudo-Scotus’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 10:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1953) Truth and Consequence in Mediaeval Logic (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics), North-HollandGoogle Scholar
(1971). ‘Does Ockham Accept Material Implication?’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965). Les Topiques d'Aristote et la dialectique platonicienne; La Méthodologie de la définition, (Études thomistiques, 10), Éditions St PaulGoogle Scholar
(1968). ‘La Fonction du lieu et de l'instrument dans les Topiques’, in (ed.) Aristotle on Dialectic. Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
(1961). Logica and Tractatus de sensu composito et diviso, ed. (Franciscan Institute Text Series, 13) The Franciscan InstituteGoogle Scholar
(1969–). Opera theologica, ed. (Corpus Christianorum, Continuatio mediaevalis, n–12), BrepolsGoogle Scholar
(1969b). Super Topica glossae, ed. in Pietro Abelardo: Scritti di logica, La nuova Italia EditriceGoogle Scholar
(1489). Textus omnium tractatuum Petri Hispani etiam sincathegreumatum et parvorum logicalium cum copulatis secundum doctrinam divi Thome Aquinatis iuxta processum magistrorum Colonic in bursa Montis regentium, CologneGoogle Scholar
(1972). Tractatus called afterwards Summule Logicales, ed. (Wijsgerige teksten en studies, 22), Van GorcumGoogle Scholar
(1969). ‘Topik und Syllogistik im Mittelalter’ in et al. (eds.) Sapienter ordinare. Festgabe für Erich Kleineidam (Erfurter Theologische Studien, 24), St Benno VerlagGoogle Scholar
(1972). Logik und Semantik im Mittelalter — Ein Überblick (Problemata, 10), Frommann-HolzboogGoogle Scholar
(1974). ‘Zum Begriff der Intentio Secunda - Radulphus Brito, Hervaeus Natalis und Petrus Aureoli in Diskussion’, CIMAGL 13:.Google Scholar
ed. (1882). Die Schriften Notkers und seiner Schule, vol. I, Akademische Verlagsbuchhandlung von J. C. B. MohrGoogle Scholar
(1953). ‘On Some Consequentiae in Walter Burleigh’, The New Scholasticism 27:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1920–2). The Institutio oratorio of Quintilian, with an English translation by (4 vols.) (Loeb Classical Library), HeinemannGoogle Scholar
ed. (1962–7). Logica modernorum: A contribution to the History of Early Terminist Logic. I: On the Twelfth Century Theories of Fallacy (1962); II, 1: The Origin and Early Development of the Theory of Supposition; II, 2: Texts and Indices (1967), Van GorcumGoogle Scholar
ed. (1968b). ‘On the genuine text of Peter of Spain's Summule logicales II’, Vivarium 6:.Google Scholar
ed. (1970). Peter Abelard, Dialectica (Wijsgerige teksten en Studies, 1) (2nd edn.), Van GorcumGoogle Scholar
(1976). De ortu scientiarum, ed. (Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi, 4), The British Academy and The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
(1940). Sumule dialectices, ed , in Opera hactenus inedita Rogeri Baconi, fasc. 15, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
(1913). Ars Priorum in (ed.) Les Oeuvres de Siger de Courtrai (Les Philosophes Belges. Textes et Études), Louvain Institut Supérieur de PhilosophieGoogle Scholar
(1957). Opera omnia, vol. 1; Opera logica, tomus prior: Quaestiones super libro Porphyrii, Quaestiones super libro Praedicamentorum, Quaestiones super libro Perihermeneias, ed. , CedamGoogle Scholar
(1974a). ‘Five Logical Tracts by Richard Lavenham’, in (ed.), Essays in Honour of Anton Charles Pegis, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
(1978). Boethius's De topicis differentiis. Translated, with notes and essays on the text;Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
(1980a). ‘William of Sherwood's Treatise on Obligations’, Historiographia Linguistica 7:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1949). Cornelii Taciti Dialogus de oratoribus, ed. (Corpus Scriptorum Latinorum Paravianum), G. P. ParaviaGoogle Scholar
(1955). De Puritate Artis Logicae Tractatus Longior, ed. (Franciscan Institute Publications, Text series, No. 9), The Franciscan InstituteGoogle Scholar
(1937), Introductiones in logicam, ed. (Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist. Abteilung 1937, 10), Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by