Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Texts and Contexts
- II Logic and Language
- III Natural Philosophy
- 9 Matter, Form, and the Corporeal World
- 10 Cosmology: The Heavenly Bodies
- 11 Miracles
- 12 Time, Space, and Infinity
- 13 Exhalations and Other Meteorological Themes
- IV Epistemology and Psychology
- V Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology
- VI Practical Philosophy
- Biobibliographical Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
12 - Time, Space, and Infinity
from III - Natural Philosophy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Texts and Contexts
- II Logic and Language
- III Natural Philosophy
- 9 Matter, Form, and the Corporeal World
- 10 Cosmology: The Heavenly Bodies
- 11 Miracles
- 12 Time, Space, and Infinity
- 13 Exhalations and Other Meteorological Themes
- IV Epistemology and Psychology
- V Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology
- VI Practical Philosophy
- Biobibliographical Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
The development of the concepts of time, place, and the continuum in medieval Jewish philosophy involves three sets of issues. The first issue has to do with divine omniscience from the perspective of the apparent discontinuity between past and future. Clearly the past appears to be fixed in a way that the future is not. More bluntly, the past is actual whereas the future is possible. From the divine perspective there is no ontological difference between past and future: All events exist in an “eternal now” for God, and so what is possible from the human perspective is actual from God’s eternal gaze. A second issue is related to the notion of creation. Traditionally, God the Creator is said to be eternal, or outside of time, whereas creatures are construed as being in time, or subject to the flow of time. By understanding the notion of creation and how an eternal, timeless Creator created a temporal universe, we may begin to understand how the notions of eternity and time function. A third issue, having to do with infinity and the continuum, leads to consideration of the notion of space (or place). The problem of infinite divisibility, which has vexed philosophers since the time of Zeno, centers on whether both time and space are infinitely divisible. If only one is divisible, we are left with a discontinuity between space and time, and yet if both space and time are infinitely divisible, then numerous paradoxes result, such as Zeno’s celebrated “Achilles and the Tortoise.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Jewish PhilosophyFrom Antiquity through the Seventeenth Century, pp. 388 - 433Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
(1946). Sefer Iqqarim (Book of Principles). (trans.). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
and (1958). Isaac Israeli. A Neoplatonic Philosopher of the Early Tenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Proofs for Eternity, Creation and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1994). The Physical Theory of Kalām: Atoms, Space and Void in Basrian Mu⼸tazili Cosmology. Leiden, E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
(1917). The Problem of Space in Jewish Medieval Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1967). “Gersonides’ Proofs for the Creation of the Universe,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research. 35:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980). “The Theory of Eternal Creation in Hasdai Crecas and some of his Predecessors,” Viator. 11:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). In Defence of Judaism: Abraham Ibn Daud. Sources and Structure of ha-Emunah ha-Ramah. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
(1996b). “Stoic Physics in the Writings of R. Sa⼸adia Gaon al-Fayyumi and Its Aftermath in Medieval Jewish Mysticism,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. 6:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987). The Wars of the Lord, volume 2: Books Two, Three, Four. (trans.). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
(1981). Much Ado About Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982). “The Effect of the Condemnation of 1277,” in Kretzmann, Kenny, and Pinborg 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Planets, Stars, and Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200–1687. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1980a) “Between Political Philosophy and Halakha in Maimonides’ Thought,” Iyyun. 29:. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1981a). “The Term ‘Hitdabbekut’ in Crescas’ Definition of Time,” Jewish Quarterly Review. 71:.Google Scholar
(1988). “Crescas vs. Maimonides on Knowledge and Pleasure,” in , , and (eds.), A Straight Path: Studies in Medieval Philosophy and Culture, Essays in Honor of Arthur Hyman. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
(1852). Das Buch Emunah Ramah, oder: der Erhabene Glaube verfasst von Abraham Ben David Halevi aus toledo (im Jahr 1160). (ed. and trans.). Frankfurt.Google Scholar
(1964). Sefer Meqor Ḥayyim [me-et] Shelomo ben Gabirol. (Hebrew trans. from the Latin), in (ed.), Otsar Ha-Maḥshavah shel ha-Yahadut. Israel: Mahberot le-sifrut.Google Scholar
(1970). Livre de la Source de Vie (Fons Vitae). (trans. and. ed.). Paris: Aubier Montaigne.Google Scholar
(1962). “Time,” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible. vol. IV. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.Google Scholar
(1982). Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (eds.) (1982). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976). “Views on time in Greek Thought,” in Cultures and Time. Paris: The Unesco Press.Google Scholar
(1963). The Guide of the Perplexed. 2 vols., (trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2003). “Conservative Tendencies in Gersonides’ Religious Philosophy,” in Frank and Leaman 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). “Pierre Duhem and the History of Late Medieval Science and Philosophy in the Latin West,” in Gli Studi di Filosofia Medievale Fra Otto e Novecento. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
(1960a). Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis (Legum Allegoria) vol 1. and (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, The Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
(1960c). On the Eternity of the World (De Aeternitate Mundi) vol 9. and (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, The Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
(1960d). On the Unchangeableness of God (Quod Deus Immutabilis Sit). vol 3 and (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, The Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
(2001). On the Creation of the Cosmos according to Moses. (trans. and commentary). Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
(1987). Philoponus: Against Aristotle on the Eternity of the World. (trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1997). “Time Telling in Ritual and Myth,” The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 6:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982). “Individuals and the Doctrine of Individuation in Gersonides,” The New Scholasticism. 51:.Google Scholar
(1983). “Divine Omniscience and Future Contingents in Gersonides,” Journal of the History of Philosophy. 21:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Time Matters: Time, Creation and Cosmology in Medieval Jewish Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1985). Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1948). The Book of Beliefs and Opinions. (trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1972c). Abridged translation of The Book of Doctrines and Beliefs, in , , (eds.), Three Jewish Philosophers. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
(1977). “Place and Space in Late Neoplatonism,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. 8:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972). “Gersonides’ Account of God’s Knowledge of Particulars.” Journal of the History of Philosophy. 10:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). “Where is the Heaven? The Story of an Aristotelian Problem and its Presentation in Jewish Medieval Sources,” Revue des études juives. 63:.Google Scholar
(1969). Les théories des visions surnaturelles dans la pensée juive du’ moyen-âge. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
(1980). Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives in Aristotle’s Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1985). The Collected Works of Spinoza. volume 1. (trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1970). The Hebrew Conception of the World: A Philological and Literary Study. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute.Google Scholar
(1882). Die Willensfreiheit and ihr Verhältniss zur Göttlichen Präscienz und Providenz Bei den Jüdischen Philosophen des Mittelalters. Berlin.Google Scholar
(1996). “Fictitious Calendars: Early Rabbinic Notions of Time, Astronomy, and Reality,” The Jewish Quarterly Review. 88:.Google Scholar
(2003). “Rabbinic Conception of Time,” in and (eds.), Time and Eternity: The Medieval Discourse. Tounhout, Belgium: Brepols.Google Scholar
(1973). La Pensée philosophique et théologique de Gersonide. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
(1947). Philo: The Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar