Book contents
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- Frontispiece
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Plates
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I International Law in Renaissance Europe (1492–1660)
- Part II International Law in Old Regime Europe (1660–1775)
- 12 The Law of Nations in Old Regime Europe
- 13 Territory and Jurisdiction in Old Regime Europe
- 14 The Law of the Sea in Old Regime Europe
- 15 War and the Use of Force in Old Regime Europe
- 16 Warfare on land in Old Regime Europe
- 17 Maritime Warfare in Old Regime Europe
- 18 Peacemaking in Old Regime Europe
- 19 Trade in Old Regime Europe
- 20 Diplomacy in Old Regime Europe
- 21 Dispute Settlement in Old Regime Europe
- 22 The Ottoman Encounter and the Law of Nations in the Old Regime
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
18 - Peacemaking in Old Regime Europe
from Part II - International Law in Old Regime Europe (1660–1775)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2025
General editor
Book contents
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- Frontispiece
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Plates
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I International Law in Renaissance Europe (1492–1660)
- Part II International Law in Old Regime Europe (1660–1775)
- 12 The Law of Nations in Old Regime Europe
- 13 Territory and Jurisdiction in Old Regime Europe
- 14 The Law of the Sea in Old Regime Europe
- 15 War and the Use of Force in Old Regime Europe
- 16 Warfare on land in Old Regime Europe
- 17 Maritime Warfare in Old Regime Europe
- 18 Peacemaking in Old Regime Europe
- 19 Trade in Old Regime Europe
- 20 Diplomacy in Old Regime Europe
- 21 Dispute Settlement in Old Regime Europe
- 22 The Ottoman Encounter and the Law of Nations in the Old Regime
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
The Old Regime period saw the highpoint of the role of peace treaties in the political and legal ordering of Christian Europe. Whereas the peace instrument by and large continued to adhere to the legal logic of the settlement of disputes about right between pairs of belligerents, important peace treaties entered into the constitutional fabric of Europe through the workings of multilateral alliances and general peace conferences and through the networking of treaties in different fashions. The encompassing nature of warfare also led to a phase of the growth of the length and legal complexity of peace treaties, particularly during the seventeenth century. The eighteenth century in turn saw a trend towards the standardisation of peace treaty clauses, marking the emergence of an elaborate body of peacemaking lore, or even law.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of International Law , pp. 588 - 619Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Further Reading
Alimento, Antonella, and Stapelbroek, Koen (eds.), The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century. Balance of Power, Balance of Trade (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2017).Google Scholar
Dhondt, Frederik, ‘From contract to treaty: the legal transformation of the Spanish Succession 1659–1713’, Journal of the History of International Law, 13 (2011) 347–76.Google Scholar
Dhondt, Frederik, Balance of Power and Norm Hierarchy. Franco-British Diplomacy after the Peace of Utrecht (Leiden and Boston: Brill/Nijhoff 2015).Google Scholar
Dingel, Irene, Rohrschneider, Michael, Schmidt-Voges, Inken, Westphal, Siegrid and Whaley, Joachim (eds.), Handbuch Frieden im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit/Handbook of Peace in Early Modern Europe (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg 2020).Google Scholar
Duchhardt, Heinz (ed.), Der Friede von Rijswijk (Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern 1998).Google Scholar
Duchhardt, Heinz, ‘The missing balance’, Journal of the History of International Law, 2 (2000) 67–72.Google Scholar
Duchhardt, Heinz, ‘Peace treaties from Westphalia to the Revolutionary Era’ in Lesaffer, Randall (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History. From the End of the Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004) 45–58.Google Scholar
Duchhardt, Heinz, and Espenhorst, Martin (eds.), Frieden übersetzen in der Vormoderne. Translationsleistungen in Diplomatie, Medien und Wissenschaft (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, Jörg, Krieg und Frieden im Friedensvertrag. Eine universalgeschichtliche Studie über Grundlagen und Formelemente des Friedensschlusses (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1979).Google Scholar
Fisch, Jörg, Die europäische Expansion und das Völkerrecht. Die Auseinandersetzungen um den Status der überseeischen Gebiete vom 15. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart (Stuttgart: Steiner 1984).Google Scholar
Ghervais, Stella, Conquering Peace from the Enlightenment to the European Union (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Huwiler, Nathanael, De pace – de bello. Eine völkerrechtshistorische Typologie der europäischen Kriege und Frieden zwischen 1648 und 1815 (St Gallen and Baden: Dike/Nomos 2017).Google Scholar
Kampmann, Christoph, ‘The Treaty of Westphalia as peace settlement and political conflict. From a German security system to the constitution of international law’ in Weller, Marc, Retter, Mark and Varga, Andreas (eds.), International Law and Peace Settlements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021) 64–85.Google Scholar
Kampmann, Christoph, Lanzinner, Maximilian, Braun, Guido and Rohrschneider, Michael (eds.), L’art de la paix. Kongresswesen und Friedensstiftung im Zeitalter des Westfälischen Friedens (Münster: Aschendorff 2011).Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall, ‘Paix et guerre dans les grands traités du dix-huitième siècle’, Journal of the History of International Law, 7 (2005) 25–41.Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall, ‘A schoolmaster abolishing homework? Vattel on peacemaking and on peace treaties’ in Chetail, Vincent and Haggenmacher, Peter (eds.), Vattel’s International Law in a XXIst Century Perspective/Le droit international de Vattel vu du XXIe siècle (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff 2011).Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall, ‘Peace treaties and the formation of international law’ in Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 71–94.Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall, ‘The lore and laws of peacemaking in early-modern and nineteenth-century peace treaties’ in Weller, Marc, Retter, Mark and Varga, Andrea (eds.), International Law and Peace Settlements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021) 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, Stephen C., ‘Peace and prosperity: commercial aspects of peacemaking’ in Lesaffer, Randall (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History. From the End of the Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004) 365–81.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas, The States System of Europe 1640–1990. Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soons, Alfred H. A. (ed.), The 1713 Peace of Utrecht and Its Enduring Effects (Leiden and Boston: Brill/Nijhoff 2019).Google Scholar
Steiger, Heinhard, ‘Friede in der Rechtsgeschichte’ in Augustyn, Wolfgang (ed.), PAX. Beiträge zu Idee und Darstellung des Friedens (Munich: Scaneg 2003) 11–62.Google Scholar
Steiger, Heinhard, ‘Vorspruche zu und in Friedensverträge der Vormoderne’ in Duchhardt, Heinz and Peters, Martin (eds.), Kalkül – Transfer – Symbol. Europäische Friedensverträge der Vormoderne (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Europäische Geschichte, Beihefte Online 1, Mainz 2006) 6–40, www.ieg-mainz.de/vieg-online-beihefte/01-2006.html.Google Scholar
Steiger, Heinhard, ‘Was haben die Untertanen vom Frieden’ in Duchhardt, Heinz and Espenhorst, Martin (eds.), Utrecht – Rastatt – Baden 1712–1714. Ein europäisches Friedenswerk am Ende des Zeitalters Ludwigs XIV. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2013) 141–65.Google Scholar