Alimento, Antonella, and Stapelbroek, Koen (eds.), The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century. Balance of Power, Balance of Trade (Cham: Palgrave 2017).Google Scholar

Belissa, Marc, Fraternité universelle et intérêt national (1713–1795). Les cosmopolitiques du droit des gens (Paris: Editions Kimé 1998).Google Scholar

Dhondt, Frederik, ‘La représentation du droit dans la communauté des diplomates européens des “Trente Heureuses” (1713–1740)’, Legal History Review, 81 (2013) 595–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhondt, Frederik, Balance of Power and Norm Hierarchy. Franco-British Diplomacy after the Peace of Utrecht (Leiden and Boston: Brill/Nijhoff 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz, ‘The missing balance’, Journal of the History of International Law, 2 (2000) 67–72.Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz, ‘From the Peace of Westphalia to the Congress of Vienna’ in Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds.), Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 628–53.Google Scholar

Durst, Benjamin, Archive des Völkerrechts. Gedruckte Sammlungen europäischer Mächteverträge in der Frühen Neuzeit (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaurier, Dominique, Histoire du droit international de l’Antiquité à la création de l’ONU (Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes 2014).Google Scholar

Grewe, Wilhelm G., The Epochs of International Law (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iurlaro, Francesca, The Invention of Custom. Natural Law and the Law of Nations, ca. 1550–1750 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Kampmann, Christoph, ‘The Treaty of Westphalia as peace settlement and political concept. From a German security system to the constitution of international law’ in Weller, Marc, Retter, Mark and Varga, Andrea (eds.), International Law and Peace Settlements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021) 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The advantage of treaties: international law in the Enlightenment’, Edinburgh Law Review, 13 (2009) 27–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International law and raison d’état: rethinking the prehistory of international law’ in Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin (eds.), The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations. Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010) 297–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth. Legal Imagination and International Power, 1300–1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘The nature of Europe’s classical law of nations’ in Besson, Samantha and d’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017) 99–117.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘The classical law of nations’ in Orakhelashvili, Alexander (ed.), Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law (2nd edn, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar 2020) 326–59.Google Scholar

Luard, Evan, The Balance of Power. The System of International Relations, 1648–1815 (Basingstoke and London: Macmillan 1992).Google Scholar

Osiander, Andreas, The States System of Europe 1640–1990. Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1994).Google Scholar

Steiger, Heinhard, ‘Rechtliche Strukturen der Europäischen Staatenordnung 1648–1792’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Rechts und Völkerrecht, 59 (1999) 609–47.Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael, Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland, vol. I (2nd edn, Munich: C. H. Beck 2012).Google Scholar

Wijffels, Alain, ‘Early-modern scholarship on international law’ in Orakhelashvili, Alexander (ed.), Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law (2nd edn, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar 2020) 19–57, at 37–47.Google Scholar

Aretin, Karl Othmar von, Das Alte Reich 1648–1806, 3 vols. (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1993–7).Google Scholar

Belmessous, Saliha (ed.), Empire by Treaty. Negotiating European Expansion, 1600–1900 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Bély, Lucien, Hanotin, Guillaume and Poumarède, Géraud (eds.), La diplomatie-monde. Autour de la paix d’Utrecht 1713 (Paris: Pedone 2019).Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren, A Search for Sovereignty. Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz, Balance of Power und Pentarchie (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh 1997).Google Scholar

Erbig, Jeffrey Allen, Where Caciques and Mapmakers Met. Border Making in Eighteenth-Century South America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 2020).Google Scholar

Frey, Linda, and Frey, Marsha (eds.), The Treaties of the War of the Spanish Succession. An Historical and Critical Dictionary (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press 1995).Google Scholar

Greengrass, Mark (ed.), Conquest and Coalescence. The Shaping of the State in Early Modern Europe (New York: E. Arnold 1991).Google Scholar

Grewe, Wilhelm G., The Epochs of International Law (Berlin and New York: Walter De Gruyter 2000).Google Scholar

Herzog, Tamar, Frontiers of Possession. Spain and Portugal in Europe and the Americas (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Malettke, Klaus, Hegemonie – Multipolares System – Gleichgewicht (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schnettger, Matthias, ‘Das Alte Reich und Italien in der Frühen Neuzeit. Ein institutionsgeschichtlicher Überblick’, Quellen und Forschungen aus Italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken, 79 (1999) 344–420.Google Scholar

Steiger, Heinhard, ‘Rechtliche Strukturen der europäischen Staatenordnung 1648–1792’, Zeitschrift für ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, 59 (1999) 609–49.Google Scholar

Verzijl, Jan Hendrik Willem, International Law in Historical Perspective, vol. III (Leiden: Sijthof 1970).Google Scholar

Whaley, Joachim, Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, vol. II (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Anand, Ram Prakash, Origin and Development of the Law of the Sea. History of International Law Revisited (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bederman, David, ‘The sea’ in Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 359–79.Google Scholar

Boxer, Charles Ralph, The Dutch Seaborne Empire, 1600–1800 (London: Hutchinson 1965).Google Scholar

Brito Vieira, Mónica, ‘Mare liberum vs. Mare clausum: Grotius, Freitas and Selden’s debate on dominion over the seas’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64 (2003) 361–77.Google Scholar

Bustamante y Sirven, Antonio Sánchez de, La mer territoriale (Paris: Recueil Sirey 1930).Google Scholar

Butler, Geoffrey, and Maccoby, Simon, The Development of International Law (London: Longmans, Green 1928).Google Scholar

Clark, George Norman, The Dutch Alliance and the War against French Trade 1688–1697 (Manchester, London and New York: Manchester University Press/Longmans, Green and Co. 1923).Google Scholar

Feenstra, Robert (ed.), Hugo Grotius Mare Liberum 1609–2009 (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grewe, Wilhelm Georg, Epochen der Völkerrechtsgeschichte (Baden: Nomos 1984).Google Scholar

Hautefeuille, Laurent-Basile, Histoire des origines, des progrès et des variations du droit maritime international (Paris: Guillaumin and Durand 1858).Google Scholar

Hofmann, Björn, Das Küstenmeer im Völkerrecht (Baden: Nomos 2008).Google Scholar

Jessup, Philipp C., and Deák, Francis, Neutrality: Its History, Economics and Law, vol. I (New York: Columbia University Press 1935).Google Scholar

Kirchner, Andree, ‘History of law of the sea’ in Rüdiger, Wolfrum (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. VI (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 732–8.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Arthur, A Concise History of the Law of Nations (rev. edn, New York: Macmillan 1954).Google Scholar

O’Connell, Daniel Patrick, ‘The juridical nature of the territorial sea’, British Yearbook of International Law, 45 (1971) 303–83.Google Scholar

Higgins, Pearce, Alexander, and Constantine John Colombos, The International Law of the Sea (London, New York and Toronto: Longmans, Green and Co. 1943).Google Scholar

Raestad, Arnold, ‘La portée du canon comme limite de la mer territoriale’, Revue générale de droit international public, 19 (1912) 598–623.Google Scholar

Roelofsen, Cornelis Gerrit, ‘De periode 1450–1713’ in Eyffinger, Arthur C. G. M. (ed.), Compendium volkenrechtsgeschiedenis (2nd edn, Deventer: Kluwer 1991) 43–108.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1950).Google Scholar

Stevens, William Oliver, and Westcott, Allan, A History of Sea Power (Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co. 1952).Google Scholar

Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf (ed.), Handbuch des Seerechts (Munich: Beck 2006).Google Scholar

Aure, Andreas Harald, The Right to Wage War (jus ad bellum). The German Reception of Grotius 50 Years after De iure belli ac pacis (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag 2015).Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frederic J., Declaring War in Early Modern Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boisen, Camilla, ‘Vattel, the balance of power, and the moral justification of war’ in Schröder, Peter (ed.), Concepts and Contexts of Vattel’s Political and Legal Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021) 123–40.Google Scholar

Dhondt, Frederik, ‘History in legal doctrine. Vattel and Réal de Curban on the War of the Spanish Succession’ in De ruysscher, Dave, Capelle, Kaap, Colette, Maarten, Deseure, Brecht and Van Assche, Gorik (eds.), Rechtsgeschiedenis op nieuwe wegen. Legal History, Moving in New Directions (Antwerp and Apeldoorn: Maklu 2015) 367–94.Google Scholar

Dhondt, Frederik, ‘The law of nations and declarations of war after the Peace of Utrecht’, History of European Ideas, 42 (2016) 329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haggenmacher, Peter, Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste (Paris: Presses universitaires de France 1983).Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona A., and Shapiro, Scott J., The Internationalists and Their Plan to Outlaw War (London: Allen Lane 2017).Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona A., Holste, William S., Shapiro, Scott J., Van de Velde, Jacqueline and Wang Lachowicz, Lisa, ‘War manifestos’, University of Chicago Law Review, 85 (2018) 1139–226.Google Scholar

Kalmanovitz, Pablo, The Laws of War in International Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar

Klesmann, Bernd, Bellum solemne. Formen und Funktionen europäische Kriegserklärungen des 17. Jahrhundert (Mainz: Philip von Zabern 2007).Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘Aggression before Versailles’, European Journal of International Law, 29 (2018) 773–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘The laws of war- and peace-making’ in Lesaffer, Randall and Nijman, Janne E. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Grotius (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021) 433–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neff, Stephen C., War and the Law of Nations. A General History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Rech, Walter, Enemies of Mankind. Vattel’s Theory of Collectice Security (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Repgen, Konrad, ‘Kriegslegitimationen in Alteuropa. Entwurf einer historische Typologie’, Historische Zeitschrift, 241 (1985) 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvestrini, Gabriela, ‘The unjust aggressor and the enemy of the human race in Vattel’s theory of the law of nations’, Grotiana, new series 31 (2010) 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tischer, Anuschka, Offizielle Kriegsbegründungen in der Frühen Neuzeit. Herrscherkommunikation in Europa zwischen Souveränität und korporativem Selbstverständnis (Münster: LIT 2012).Google Scholar

Tischer, Anuschka, ‘Princes’ justifications of war in early modern Europe: the constitution of an international community by communication’ in Brock, Lothar and Simon, Hendrik (eds.), The Justification of War and International Order. From Past to Present (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021) 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tuck, Richard, The Rights of War and Peace. Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Wampach, Christophe, Armed Reprisals from Medieval Times to 1945 (Baden: Nomos 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitman, James Q., The Verdict of Battle. The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War (New Haven and London: Yale University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Zurbuchen, Simone, ‘Vattel’s law of nations and just war theory’, History of European Ideas, 35 (2009) 408–17.Google Scholar

Anderson, Matthew S., War and Society in Europe of the Old Regime 1618–1789 (Guernsey: Guernsey Press Company 1998).Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy, European Warfare in a Global Context, 1660–1815 (London: UCL Press 1994).Google Scholar

Browning, Reed S., The War of the Austrian Succession (New York: St Martin’s Griffin 1995).Google Scholar

Chandler, David G., The Art of Warfare in the Age of Marlborough (New York: Sarpedon 1995).Google Scholar

Contamine, Philippe, Guerre et concurrence entre les Etats européens du XIVe au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Presses universitaires de France 1998).Google Scholar

Drévillon, Hervé (ed.), Mondes en guerre. Tome II. L’Âge classique XVe–XIXe siècle (Paris: Passés composés 2019).Google Scholar

Duffy, Christopher, Russia’s Military Way to the West: Origins and Nature of Russian Military Power, 1700–1800 (London and Boston: Henley 1981).Google Scholar

Duffy, Christopher, The Military Experience in the Age of Reason (London and New York: Routledge 1987).Google Scholar

Félicité, Indravati, Négocier pour exister. Les villes et duchés du nord de l’Empire face à la France 1650–1730 (Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg 2016).Google Scholar

Fiedler, Siegfried, Heerwesen Der Neuzeit. Taktik und Strategie Der Kabinettskriege, 1650–1792 (Augsburg: Bechtermünz 2002).Google Scholar

Frost, Robert, The Northern Wars. War, State and Society in Northeastern Europe, 1558–1721 (Harlow: Pearson Education 2000).Google Scholar

Jalabert, Laurent, Les prisonniers de guerre (XVe–XIXe siècle). Entre marginalisation et reconnaissance (Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes 2018).Google Scholar

Kalmanovitz, Pablo, The Laws of War in International Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar

Luh, Jürgen, Kriegskunst in Europa 1650–1800 (Cologne: Böhlau 2004).Google Scholar

Lynn, John A., The Wars of Louis XIV, 1667–1714 (Harlow: Pearson Education 1999).Google Scholar

Mattéi, Jean-Mathieu, Histoire du droit de la guerre (1700–1819), 2 vols. (Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morieux, Renaud, The Society of Prisoners. Anglo-French Wars and Incarceration in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neff, Stephen C., War and the Law of Nations. A General History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Ostwald, Jamel, Vauban under Siege. Engineering Efficiency and Martial Vigor in the War of the Spanish Succession (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starkey, Armstrong, War in the Age of Enlightenment, 1700–1789 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press 2003).Google Scholar

Szabo, Franz, The Seven Years War in Europe, 1756–1763 (Harlow: Pearson Education 2008).Google Scholar

Alimento, Antonella (ed.), War, Trade and Neutrality. Europe and the Mediterranean in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Milan: Franco Angeli 2011).Google Scholar

Alimento, Antonella, and Stapelbroek, Koen (eds.), The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century (Cham: Springer International Publishing 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baugh, Daniel A., The Global Seven Years War, 1754–1763. Britain and France in a Great Power Contest (Harlow and New York: Longman 2011).Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy, The British Seaborne Empire (New Haven and London: Yale University Press 2004).Google Scholar

Bromley, John S., Corsairs and Navies, 1660–1760 (London: Hambledon Press 1987).Google Scholar

Calafat, Guillaume, Une mer jalousiée. Contribution à l’histoire de la souveraineté (Méditerranée, XVIIe siècle) (Paris: Seuil 2019).Google Scholar

Chaline, Olivier, La mer et la France. Quand les Bourbons voulaient dominer les océans (Paris: Flammarion 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, George N., The Dutch Alliance and the War against French Trade, 1688–1697 (Manchester: Manchester University Press 1923).Google Scholar

Davies, J. D., James, Alan and Rommelse, Gijs (eds.), Ideologies of Western Naval Power, c. 1500–1815 (New York: Routledge 2020).Google Scholar

Dessert, Daniel, La Royale. Vaisseaux et marins du Roi-Soleil (Paris: Fayard 1996).Google Scholar

Glete, Jan, Navies and Nations. Warships, Navies, and State Building in Europe and America, 1500–1860 (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International 1993).Google Scholar

Harding, Richard, Seapower and Naval Warfare, 1650–1830 (London: Routledge 2002).Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., and Deák, Francis (eds.), Neutrality. Its History, Economics and Law, vol. I , The Origins (New York: Columbia University Press 1935).Google Scholar

Kulsrud, Carl J., Maritime Neutrality to 1780. A History of the Main Principles Governing Neutrality and Belligerency to 1780 (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co. 1936).Google Scholar

Morieux, Renaud, The Society of Prisoners. Anglo-French Wars and Incarceration in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Naguib Leerberg, Nora, The Legal Politics of Neutrality in the Age of Privateering. Martin Hübner’s Law of Neutrality and Prize (Oslo: Dreyersforlag 2015).Google Scholar

Neff, Stephen, The Rights and Duties of Neutrals. A General History (Manchester: Manchester University Press 2000).Google Scholar

Ormrod, David, and Rommelse, Gijs (eds.), War, Trade and the State. Anglo-Dutch Conflict 1652–89 (Woodbridge: The Boydell Press 2020).Google Scholar

Owen, John H., War at Sea under Queen Anne 1702–1708 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Pares, Richard, Colonial Blockade and Neutral Rights, 1739–1763 (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1938).Google Scholar

Schnakenbourg, Éric, Entre la guerre et la paix. Neutralité et relations internationales, XVIIe–XVIIIe siècles (Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes 2013).Google Scholar

Schnakenbourg, Éric (ed.), Neutres et neutralité dans l’espace atlantique durant le long XVIIIe siècle (1700–1820). Une approche globale (Bécherel: Editions Les Perséides 2015).Google Scholar

Shovlin, John, Trading with the Enemy. Britain, France, and the 18th-Century Quest for a Peaceful World Order (New Haven and London: Yale University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Stapelbroek, Koen (ed.), Trade and War. The Neutrality of Commerce in the Inter-State System (Helsinki: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies 2011).Google Scholar

Villiers, Patrick, Des vaisseaux et des hommes. La marine de Louis XV et Louis XVI (Paris: Fayard 2021).Google Scholar

Alimento, Antonella, and Stapelbroek, Koen (eds.), The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century. Balance of Power, Balance of Trade (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2017).Google Scholar

Dhondt, Frederik, ‘From contract to treaty: the legal transformation of the Spanish Succession 1659–1713’, Journal of the History of International Law, 13 (2011) 347–76.Google Scholar

Dhondt, Frederik, Balance of Power and Norm Hierarchy. Franco-British Diplomacy after the Peace of Utrecht (Leiden and Boston: Brill/Nijhoff 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingel, Irene, Rohrschneider, Michael, Schmidt-Voges, Inken, Westphal, Siegrid and Whaley, Joachim (eds.), Handbuch Frieden im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit/Handbook of Peace in Early Modern Europe (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg 2020).Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz (ed.), Der Friede von Rijswijk (Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern 1998).Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz, ‘The missing balance’, Journal of the History of International Law, 2 (2000) 67–72.Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz, ‘Peace treaties from Westphalia to the Revolutionary Era’ in Lesaffer, Randall (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History. From the End of the Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004) 45–58.Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz, and Espenhorst, Martin (eds.), Frieden übersetzen in der Vormoderne. Translationsleistungen in Diplomatie, Medien und Wissenschaft (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2012).Google Scholar

Fisch, Jörg, Krieg und Frieden im Friedensvertrag. Eine universalgeschichtliche Studie über Grundlagen und Formelemente des Friedensschlusses (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1979).Google Scholar

Fisch, Jörg, Die europäische Expansion und das Völkerrecht. Die Auseinandersetzungen um den Status der überseeischen Gebiete vom 15. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart (Stuttgart: Steiner 1984).Google Scholar

Ghervais, Stella, Conquering Peace from the Enlightenment to the European Union (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Huwiler, Nathanael, De pace – de bello. Eine völkerrechtshistorische Typologie der europäischen Kriege und Frieden zwischen 1648 und 1815 (St Gallen and Baden: Dike/Nomos 2017).Google Scholar

Kampmann, Christoph, ‘The Treaty of Westphalia as peace settlement and political conflict. From a German security system to the constitution of international law’ in Weller, Marc, Retter, Mark and Varga, Andreas (eds.), International Law and Peace Settlements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021) 64–85.Google Scholar

Kampmann, Christoph, Lanzinner, Maximilian, Braun, Guido and Rohrschneider, Michael (eds.), L’art de la paix. Kongresswesen und Friedensstiftung im Zeitalter des Westfälischen Friedens (Münster: Aschendorff 2011).Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘Paix et guerre dans les grands traités du dix-huitième siècle’, Journal of the History of International Law, 7 (2005) 25–41.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘A schoolmaster abolishing homework? Vattel on peacemaking and on peace treaties’ in Chetail, Vincent and Haggenmacher, Peter (eds.), Vattel’s International Law in a XXIst Century Perspective/Le droit international de Vattel vu du XXIe siècle (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff 2011).Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘Peace treaties and the formation of international law’ in Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 71–94.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘The lore and laws of peacemaking in early-modern and nineteenth-century peace treaties’ in Weller, Marc, Retter, Mark and Varga, Andrea (eds.), International Law and Peace Settlements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021) 46–63.Google Scholar

Neff, Stephen C., ‘Peace and prosperity: commercial aspects of peacemaking’ in Lesaffer, Randall (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History. From the End of the Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004) 365–81.Google Scholar

Osiander, Andreas, The States System of Europe 1640–1990. Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994).Google Scholar

Soons, Alfred H. A. (ed.), The 1713 Peace of Utrecht and Its Enduring Effects (Leiden and Boston: Brill/Nijhoff 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiger, Heinhard, ‘Friede in der Rechtsgeschichte’ in Augustyn, Wolfgang (ed.), PAX. Beiträge zu Idee und Darstellung des Friedens (Munich: Scaneg 2003) 11–62.Google Scholar

Steiger, Heinhard, ‘Vorspruche zu und in Friedensverträge der Vormoderne’ in Duchhardt, Heinz and Peters, Martin (eds.), Kalkül – Transfer – Symbol. Europäische Friedensverträge der Vormoderne (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Europäische Geschichte, Beihefte Online 1, Mainz 2006) 6–40, www.ieg-mainz.de/vieg-online-beihefte/01-2006.html.Google Scholar

Steiger, Heinhard, ‘Was haben die Untertanen vom Frieden’ in Duchhardt, Heinz and Espenhorst, Martin (eds.), Utrecht – Rastatt – Baden 1712–1714. Ein europäisches Friedenswerk am Ende des Zeitalters Ludwigs XIV. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2013) 141–65.Google Scholar

Alimento, Antonella, and Stapelbroek, Koen (eds.), The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century. Balance of Power, Balance of Trade (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2017).Google Scholar

Hont, Istvan, Jealousy of Trade. International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth. Legal Imagination and International Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Ormrod, David, The Rise of Commercial Empires. England and the Netherlands in the Age of Mercantilism, 1650–1770 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003).Google Scholar

Pal, Maïa, Jurisdictional Accumulation. An Early Modern History of Law, Empires, and Capital (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Shovlin, John, Trading with the Enemy. Britain, France, and the 18th-Century Quest for a Peaceful World Order (New Haven and London: Yale University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Stern, Philip J., The Company-State. Corporate Sovereignty & the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Stern, Philip J., and Wennerlind, Carl (eds.), Mercantilism Reimagined. Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and Its Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Adair, E. R., The Extraterritoriality of Ambassadors in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (New York: Longmans, Green 1929).Google Scholar

Armitage, David, Foundations of Modern International Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Bély, Lucien, Espions et ambassadeurs au temps de Louis XIV (Paris: Fayard 1990).Google Scholar

Bély, Lucien, ‘Souveraineté et souverains: la question du cérémonial dans les relations internationales à l’époque moderne’, Annuaire-bulletin de la Société de l’histoire de France, 130 (1993) 27–43.Google Scholar

Bély, Lucien, L’art de la paix en Europe. Naissance de la diplomatie moderne XVI–XVIIe siècle (Paris: Presses universitaires de France 2007).Google Scholar

Bolesta-Koziebrodzki, Léopold, Le droit d’asile (Leiden: Sijthoff 1962).Google Scholar

Frey, Linda S., and Frey, Marsha, The History of Diplomatic Immunity (Columbus: Ohio State University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Heyking, Alphonse, L’exterritorialité (Paris: Rousseau 1926).Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, T. J., Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtzendorff, Franz de, and River, Alphonse, Introduction au droit des gens (Paris: Fischbacher 1889).Google Scholar

Krieger, Leonard, The Politics of Discretion. Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1965).Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘The Grotian tradition revisited: change and continuity in the history of international law’, British Yearbook of International Law, 71 (2002) 103–39.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, European Legal History. A Cultural and Political Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Neff, Stephen C., Justice among Nations. A History of International Law (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Frederick, A Concise History of the Law of Nations (New York: Macmillan 1947).Google Scholar

Ogdon, Montell, Juridical Bases of Diplomatic Immunity. A Study in the Origin, Growth and Purpose of the Law (Washington, DC: John Byrne 1936).Google Scholar

Pietri, François, Étude critique sur la fiction d’exterritorialité (Paris: Arthur Rousseau 1895).Google Scholar

Ruddy, Stephen, International Law in the Enlightenment. The Background of Emmerich de Vattel’s Le Droit des Gens (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications 1978).Google Scholar

Satow, Ernest, A Guide to Diplomatic Practice, 2 vols. (London: Longmans, Green 1917).Google Scholar

Tobar y Borgoño, C. M., L’asile interne devant le droit international (Barcelona: Carbonell y Esteva 1911).Google Scholar

Wheaton, Henry, Elements of International Law (text of 1866, The Classics of International Law, Oxford and London: Clarendon Press/Humphrey Milford 1936).Google Scholar

Bély, Lucien, Espions et ambassadeurs au temps de Louis XIV (Paris: Fayard 1990).Google Scholar

Bély, Lucien, ‘La médiation diplomatique au XVIIe siècle et au début du XVIIIe siècle’ in Armées et diplomatie dans l’Europe du XVIIe siècle. Actes du colloque de 1991 (Paris: Sorbonnes Université Presses 1992) 129–47.Google Scholar

Bosbach, Franz, ‘Friedensverhandlungen’ in Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit, vol. IV (Stuttgart: Metzler 2006) 34–41.Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz, Studien zur Friedensvermittlung in der Frühen Neuzeit (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner 1979).Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz, ‘Peace treaties from Westphalia to the Revolutionary Era’ in Lesaffer, Randall (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History. From the End of the Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004) 45–58.Google Scholar

Heywood, Colin, ‘“This great work”: Lord Paget and the processes of English mediating diplomacy in the latter stages of the Sacra Lega War, 1697–1698’ in Heywood, Colin and Parvev, Ivan (eds.), The Treaties of Carlowitz (1699). Antecedents, Course and Consequences (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2020) 35–55.Google Scholar

Kampmann, Christoph, Arbiter und Friedensstiftung. Die Auseinandersetzung um den politischen Schiedsrichter im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh 2001).Google Scholar

Kampmann, Christoph, ‘Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit’ in Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit, vol. XI (Stuttgart: Metzler 2010) 713–17.Google Scholar

Kampmann, Christoph, ‘The Treaty of Westphalia as peace settlement and political concept: from a German security system to the constitution of international law’ in Weller, Marc, Retter, Mark and Varga, Andrea (eds.), International Law and Peace Settlements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021) 64–85.Google Scholar

Kampmann, Christoph, ‘De l’arbitre à l’arbitrium: sur la tradition et l’influence d’un concept politique en Europe au début de l’époque moderne’ in Malgrand, Anne-Sophie Nardelli and Pialoux, Albane (eds.), L’arbitre de l’Europe? Penser, fixer, contester les hierarchies politiques en Europe du XVIe au XXe siècle (Chambéry: Presses universitaires Savoie Mont Blanc 2022) 109–27.Google Scholar

Kampmann, Christoph, Lanzinner, Maximilian, Braun, Guido and Rohrschneider, Michael (eds.), L’art de la paix. Kongresswesen und Friedensstiftung im Zeitalter des Westfälischen Friedens (Münster: Aschendorff 2011).Google Scholar

Köhler, Matthias, Strategie und Symbolik. Verhandeln auf dem Kongress von Nimwegen (Cologne: Böhlau 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koller, Alexander, ‘Mediation’ in Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit, vol. VIII (Stuttgart: Metzler 2008) 213–19.Google Scholar

Laufs, Markus, ‘In viam pacis’. Techniken und Methoden päpstlicher Friedensvermittlung auf den Kongressen von Münster (1643–1649) und Nimwegen (1676–1676) (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck 2022).Google Scholar

Laufs, Markus, and Wenzel, Christian, ‘Conflict management in the early modern period: mediating and safeguarding treaties’ in Goetze, Dorothée and Oetzel, Lena (eds.), Early Modern European Diplomacy. A Handbook (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter 2024) 707–24.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘Paix et guerre dans les grands traités du dix-huitième siècle’, Journal of the History of International Law, 7 (2005) 25–42.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘A schoolmaster abolishing homework? Vattel on peace making and peace treaties’ in Chetail, Vincent and Haggenmacher, Peter (eds.), Vattel’s International Law in a XXI Century Perspective/Le droit international de Vattel vu du XXIe siècle (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff 2011) 353–84.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘Peace treaties and the formation of international law’ in Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 71–94.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘The lore and laws of peace-making in early modern and nineteenth-century European peace treaties’ in Weller, Marc, Retter, Mark and Varga, Andrea (eds.), International Law and Peace Settlements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021) 46–63.Google Scholar

Lingens, Karl-Heinz, Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Jus Publicum Europaeum 1648–1794 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1988).Google Scholar

Neveu, Bruno, ‘Nimègue ou l’art de négocier’ in Bots, J. A. H. (ed.), The Peace of Nijmwegen 1676-1678/79. International Congress of the Tricentennial Nijmwegen (Amsterdam: Apa-Holland 1980) 237–60.Google Scholar

Repgen, Konrad, ‘Friedensvermittlung als Element europäischer Politik vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart’ in Repgen (ed.), Dreißigjähriger Krieg und Westfälischer Frieden (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh 2015) 1099–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rietbergen, Peter J., ‘Papal diplomacy and mediation at the Peace of Nimwegen’ in Bots, J. A. H. (ed.), The Peace of Nijmwegen 1676–1678/79. International Congress of the Tricentennial Nijmwegen (Amsterdam: Apa-Holland 1980) 29–96.Google Scholar

Rohrschneider, Michael, ‘Friedensvermittlung und Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit’ in Dingel, Irene, Rohrschneider, Michael, Schmidt-Voges, Inken, Westphal, Siegrid and Whaley, Joachim (eds.), Handbuch Frieden im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter 2021) 473–90.Google Scholar

Schlochauer, Hans-Jürgen, ‘Die Entwicklung der Internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit’, Archiv des Völkerrechts, 10 (1962–3) 1-41.Google Scholar

den Boogert, Van, Maurits, H., ‘The spoils of peace: what the Dutch got out of Carlowitz’ in Heywood, Colin and Parvev, Ivan (eds.), The Treaties of Carlowitz (1699). Antecedents, Course and Consequences (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2020) 56–72.Google Scholar

Wenzel, Christian, ‘Vengeurs des Contraventions. Garantie, Vertragsbruch und Reputation in der Frühen Neuzeit, Marburg’ (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Ziegler, Karl-Heinz, ‘The peace treaties of the Ottoman Empire with European Christian powers’ in Lesaffer, Randall (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History. From the End of the Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004) 338–64.Google Scholar

Abbott, G. F., Under the Turk in Constantinople. A Record of Sir John Finch’s Embassy 1674–1681 (London: Macmillan 1920).Google Scholar

Atabey, Ali, ‘Ransom intermediaries and the redemption of Ottoman captives in the Early Modern Mediterranean: a sociolegal view from seventeenth-century Galata’, Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association, 8 (2021) 261–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berchtold, Johannes, Recht und Gerechtigkeit in der Konsulargerichtsbarkeit. Britische Extraterritorialität im Osmanischen Reich 1825–1914 (Munich: Oldenbourg 2009).Google Scholar

Can, Lâle, Low, Michael Christopher, Schull, Kent F. and Zens, Robert (eds.), The Subjects of Ottoman International Law (Bloomington: Indiana University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Groot, Alexander H., ‘The historical development of the capitulatory regime in the Ottoman Middle East from the fifteenth to the nineteenth centuries’, Oriente Moderno, 22 (2003) 575–604.Google Scholar

Dumas, Juliette, ‘Müste’min dealing with the Ottoman justice: role and strategy of the ambassador’, Oriente Moderno, 93 (2013) 477–94.Google Scholar

Fodor, Pál, ‘Maltese pirates, Ottoman captives and French traders in the early seventeenth-century Mediterranean’ in Dávid, Géza and Fodor, Pál (eds.), Ransom Slavery along the Ottoman Borders (Early Fifteenth – Early Eighteenth Centuries) (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2007) 221–37.Google Scholar

Heyd, Uriel, Studies in Old Ottoman Criminal Law (ed. Ménage, V. L., Oxford: Clarendon Press 1973).Google Scholar

Heywood, Colin, ‘Ottoman territoriality versus maritime usage: the Ottoman islands and English privateering in the wars with France 1689–1714’ in Vatin, Nicolas and Veinstein, Gilles (eds.), Insularités ottomans (Istanbul: Institut français d’études anatoliennes 2016) 145–73.Google Scholar

Heywood, Colin, and Parvev, Ivan (eds.), The Treaties of Carlowitz (1699). Antecendents, Course and Consequences (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2020).Google Scholar

Olnon, Merlijn, ‘“Brought under the law of the land”: the history, demography and geography of crossculturalism in early modern Izmir, and the Köprülü Project of 1678’ (PhD thesis, Leiden University 2013).Google Scholar

Panaite, Viorel, Ottoman Law of War and Peace. The Ottoman Empire and its Tribute-Payers from North of the Danube (2nd edn, Leiden and Boston: Brill 2019).Google Scholar

Pedani, Maria Pia, The Ottoman–Venetian Border (15th–18th Centuries) (Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari-Digital Publishing 2017).Google Scholar

Sicking, Louis, and Wijffels, Alain (eds.), Conflict Management in the Mediterranean and the Atlantic, 1000–1800. Actors, Institutions and Strategies of Dispute Settlement (Leiden and Boston: Brill/Nijhoff 2020).Google Scholar

Smiley, Will, From Slaves to Prisoners of War. The Ottoman Empire, Russia, and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Talbot, Michael, British-Ottoman Relations, 1661–1807. Commerce and Diplomatic Practice in Eighteenth-Century Istanbul (Woodbridge: The Boydell Press 2017).Google Scholar

van den Boogert, Maurits H., The Capitulations and the Ottoman Legal System. Qadis, Consuls and Beratlıs in the 18th Century (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2005).Google Scholar

van den Boogert, Maurits H., ‘Written proof between capitulations and Ottoman kadi courts in the early modern period’, Turkish Historical Review, 12 (2021) 1–18.Google Scholar

Vanneste, Tijl, Intra-European Litigation in Eighteenth-Century Izmir. The Role of the Merchants’ Style (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2022).Google Scholar

White, Joshua M., ‘Fetva diplomacy: the Ottoman Şeyhülislam as trans-imperial intermediary’, Journal of Early Modern History, 19 (2015) 199–221.Google Scholar

White, Joshua M., Piracy and Law in the Ottoman Mediterranean (Stanford: Stanford University Press 2018).Google Scholar