Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:10:26.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Giftedness and Wisdom

from Part VI - Wisdom and Other Psychological Constructs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2019

By
Don Ambrose
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg  and
Judith Glück
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Judith Glück
Affiliation:
Universität Klagenfurt, Austria
Get access

Summary

One would think that gifted individuals should naturally be wise, because high-powered cognition must establish strong big-picture thinking and ethical awareness. Unfortunately, the connection between giftedness and wisdom is not guaranteed. While research into giftedness and talent development does address the ethical aspects of wisdom to some extent, the education of gifted and talented individuals usually overemphasizes academic content mastery while insufficiently addressing the development of wisdom. The field of gifted education has explored some phenomena relevant to wisdom. These include the dynamics of personality development, the complexities of moral reasoning and character education, and the importance of global awareness. Expanding conceptions of giftedness will encourage professionals to include wisdom in the education and mentorship of the gifted. In addition, interdisciplinary thinking can strengthen the connections between wisdom and giftedness.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom , pp. 465 - 482
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrose, D. (2003). Barriers to aspiration development and self-fulfillment: Interdisciplinary insights for talent discovery. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 282–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2005). Aspiration growth, talent development, and self-fulfillment in a context of democratic erosion. Roeper Review, 28, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2008). Utopian visions: Promise and pitfalls in the global awareness of the gifted. Roeper Review, 30, 52–60. doi: 10.1080/02783190701836460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2009). Expanding visions of creative intelligence: An interdisciplinary exploration. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2012a). The not-so-invisible hand of economics and its impact on conceptions and manifestations of high ability. In Ambrose, D., Sternberg, R. J. & Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Confronting dogmatism in gifted education (pp. 97–114). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2012b). The optimal moral development of the gifted: Interdisciplinary insights about ethical identity formation. In Cross, T. L. & Cross, J. R. (Eds.) Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 351–67). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2016). Twenty-first century contextual influences on the life trajectories of creative young people. In Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Creative intelligence in the 21st century: Grappling with enormous problems and huge opportunities (pp. 21–48). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2018). Instructional strategies for thoughtful, engaged, 21st-century learning. Book manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D., & Ambrose, V. K. (2013). Adult lost prizes missing aspirations, a 21st-century education, and self-fulfillment. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity 1(1), 75–86.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. & Cross, T. L. (Eds.). (2009). Morality, ethics, and gifted minds. New York, NY: Springer Science.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (2012). How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (2016a). Creative intelligence in the 21st century: Grappling with enormous problems and huge opportunities. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (2016b). Giftedness and talent in the 21st century: Adapting to the turbulence of globalization. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D., Sternberg, R. J., & Sriraman, B. (2012). Confronting dogmatism in gifted education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D., Sriraman, B. & Cross, T. L. (2013). The Roeper School: A model for holistic development of high ability. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D., Sriraman, B., & Pierce, K. M. (Eds.). (2014). A critique of creativity and complexity: Deconstructing clichés. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, M. W., & Hoppe, M. A. (2009). Character education and gifted children. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 131–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, D. C. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education 41, 287–302. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, D. C. (2012). Narrowing curriculum, assessments, and conceptions of what it means to be smart in the US schools: Creaticide by design. In Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.) How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 79–93). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berliner, D. C. & Glass, G. V. (2014). 50 myths and lies that threaten America's public schools: The real crisis in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Brown, E. F., & Rinko-Gay, C. (2017). Moral frameworks for leaders of gifted programs and services. Roeper Review, 39, 121–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabieses, B., Pickett, K. E. & Wilkinson, R. G. (2016). The impact of socioeconomic inequality on children's health and well-being. In Komlos, J., & Kelly, I. (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of economics and human biology (pp. 244–65). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London, England: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2007). Bad Samaritans: The myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Chirot, D. (2012). Dogmatism and genocide. In Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.) How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 33–6). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chirot, D., & McCauley, C. (2006). Why not kill them all? The logic and prevention of mass political murder. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, L. J. & Cross, T. L. (2005). Being gifted in school (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
Cross, J. R., & Borland, J. H. (Eds.). 2013. Social inequality in gifted education [special issue]. Roeper Review, 35(2).Google Scholar
Cross, J. R. & Cross, T. L. (2005). Social dominance, moral politics, and gifted education. Roeper Review, 28, 21–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, J. R. & Cross, T. L. (2010). Maximizing student potential versus building community: An exploration of right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and preferred practice among supporters of gifted education. Roeper Review, 32, 235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, T. L. (2011). On the social and emotional lives of gifted kids: Understanding and guiding their development (4th ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
Dąbrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Dąbrowski, K. (1975). Foreword. In Piechowski's, M. M. A theoretical and empirical approach to the study of development Genetic Psychology Monographs (pp. 233–7). 92.Google Scholar
Dąbrowski, K., Kawczak, A., & Piechowski, M. (1970). Mental growth through positive disintegration. London, England: Gryf.Google Scholar
Dąbrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977a). Theory of levels of emotional development, Volume I – Multilevelness and positive disintegration. Oceanside, NY: Dabor.Google Scholar
Dąbrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977b). Theory of levels of emotional development, Volume II – From primary integration to self-actualization. Oceanside, NY: Dabor.Google Scholar
Daniels, S., & Piechowski, M. M. (2009). Living with intensity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.Google Scholar
Delisle, J. & Schultz, R. (2016). The legacy of George and Annemarie Roeper (special issue). Roeper Review 38(4).Google Scholar
Elder, L. & Paul, R. (2012). Dogmatism, creativity, and critical thought: The reality of human minds and the possibility of critical societies. In Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 37–49). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Farmer, P. (2003). Pathologies of power: Health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Folsom, C. (2008). Teaching for intellectual and emotional learning (TIEL): A model for creating powerful curriculum. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (2011). Intelligence, creativity, ethics: Reflections on my evolving research interests. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 302–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2002). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. L, Rimmington, G. M. & Landwehr-Brown, M. (2008). Global awareness and responsible world citizenship through global learning. Roeper Review, 30, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, B. (2009). Character problems: Justifications of character education programs, compulsory schooling, and gifted education. In Ambrose, D. & Cross, T. L. (Eds.), Morality, ethics, and gifted minds (pp. 327–44). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer–and turned its back on the middle class. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Harper, A. J., Cornish, L., Smith, S., & Merrotsy, P. (2017). Through the Dąbrowski lens: A fresh examination of the Theory of Positive Disintegration. Roeper Review, 39, 37–43. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2016.1247395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaaij, T. V. D., & Mink, F. D. (2010). Unite people by global awareness through wisdom for the gifted. Gifted Education International, 27(1), 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latz, A. O., & Adams, C. M. (2011). Critical differentiation and the twice oppressed: Social class and giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 773–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovecky, D. V. (1997). Identity development in gifted children: Moral sensitivity. Roeper Review, 20, 90–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovecky, D. V. (2009). Moral sensitivity in young gifted children. In Ambrose, D. & Cross, T. L. (Eds.), Morality, ethics, and gifted minds (pp. 161–76). New York, NY: Springer Science.Google Scholar
McGregor, G. D. (2001). Gifted and talented youth as philosophers of the new millennium. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12(3), 157–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendaglio, S. (2008). Dabrowski's theory of positive disintegration. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.Google Scholar
Mendaglio, S., & Tillier, W. (2015). Has the time come to emulate Jung? A response to Piechowski's most recent rethinking of the theory of positive disintegration: I. The case against primary integration. Roeper Review, 37(4), 219–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, R. (2012). Cultural variation and dominance in a globalized knowledge-economy: Towards a culture-sensitive research paradigm in the science of giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 27, 1, 15–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piechowski, M. M. (1974). Two developmental concepts: Multilevelness and developmental potential, Counseling and Values, 18(2), 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piechowski, M. M. (1975). A theoretical and empirical approach to the study of development, Genetic Psychology Monographs, 92, 231–97.Google Scholar
Piechowski, M. M. (1979). Developmental potential. In Colangelo, N. & Zaffran, R. T. (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 25–57). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
Piechowski, M. M. (2006). “Mellow out,” they say. If I only could. Madison, WI: Yunasa Books.Google Scholar
Piechowski, M. M. (2008). Discovering Dabrowski's theory. In Mendaglio, S. (Ed.), Dabrowski's theory of positive disintegration (pp. 41–77). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.Google Scholar
Piechowski, M. M. (2007). Peace Pilgrim, exemplar of level V. Roeper Review, 31, 103–112.Google Scholar
Piechowski, M. M. (2014). Rethinking Dąbrowski's theory: I. The case against primary integration. Roeper Review, 36, 11–17. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2013.856829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piechowski, M. M., & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 80–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piechowski, M. M., & Cunningham, K. (1985). Patterns of overexcitability in a group of artists. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pramathevan, G. S., & Garces-Bacsal, R. M. (2012). Factors influencing altruism in the context of overseas learning experiences among gifted adolescent girls in Singapore. Roeper Review, 34, 145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presbey, G. M. (1997). Hannah Arendt on power. In Kaplan, L. D. & Bove, L. F. (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on power and domination (pp. 29–40). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America's public schools. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 150–9. http://gcq.sagepub.com/content/56/3/150.shortCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeper, A. (1989a). Empathy, ethics, and global education. Understanding Our Gifted, 1(6), 1.Google Scholar
Roeper, A. (1989b). Ethics education for the gifted. The Education Digest, 54(6), 37.Google Scholar
Roeper, A. (1992). Global awareness and the young child. Roeper Review, 15, 52–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeper, A. (2008). Global awareness and gifted children: Its joy and history. Roeper Review, 30, 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, M. M., & Heilbronner, N. N. (2014). The impact of direct involvement I and direct involvement II experiences on secondary school students’ social capital, as measured by co-cognitive factors of the operation Houndstooth intervention theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, I. (2003). The state of democratic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, L. K. (1990). Issues in affective development of the gifted. In VanTassel-Baska, J. (Ed.), A practical guide to counseling the gifted in school settings (2nd ed., pp. 15–30). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
Silverman, L. K. (1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver: Love Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Silverman, L. K. (1994). The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Roeper Review, 17, 110–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, L. K. (2016). Empathy: The Heart of Dabrowski's Theory 1. Advanced Development, 15, 32.Google Scholar
Sisk, D. (2008). Engaging the spiritual intelligence of gifted students to build global awareness in the classroom. Roeper Review, 30, 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisk, D. A. (2010). fostering global awareness and global learning for gifted students. Gifted Education International, 27(1), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisk, D. (2013). Developing leadership capacity in gifted students for the present and the future. In Ambrose, D., Sriraman, B., Cross, T. L. (Eds.), The Roeper School: A model for holistic development of high ability (pp. 225–58). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998b). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Smart people are not stupid, but they sure can be foolish: The imbalance theory of foolishness. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 232–42). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Why smart people can be so foolish. European Psychologist, 9(3), 145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). WICS: A model of giftedness in leadership. Roeper Review, 28, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). A model for ethical reasoning. Review of General Psychology, 16, 319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Epilogue: Why is ethical behavior challenging? A model of ethical reasoning. In Sternberg, R. J. & Fiske, S. T. (Eds.), Ethical challenges in the behavioral and brain sciences (pp. 219–26). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2017). ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39, 152–69. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Fiske, S. E. (Eds.) (2015). Ethical challenges in the behavioral and brain sciences: Case studies and commentaries. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Free fall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2000). Giftedness: The ultimate instrument for good and evil. In Heller, K. A., Mönks, F. J., Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 447–65). Oxford, England: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Terry, A. W. (2003). Effects of service learning on young, gifted adolescents and their community. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, A. W. (2008). Student voices, global echoes: Service learning and the gifted. Roeper Review, 30, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, A. W. & Bohnenberger, J. E. (2003). Service learning: Fostering a cycle of caring in our gifted youth. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, A. W., Bohnenberger, J. E., Renzulli, J. S., Cramond, B., & Sisk, D. (2008). Vision with action: Developing sensitivity to societal concerns in gifted youth. Roeper Review, 30(1), 61–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieso, C. L. (2007a). Overexcitabilities: A new way to think about talent? Roeper Review, 29, 232–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieso, C. L. (2007b). Patterns of overexcitabilities in identified gifted students and their parents: A hierarchical model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirri, K. (2007). Values and foundations in gifted education. Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tirri, K. (2010). Combining excellence and ethics: Implications for moral education for the gifted. Roeper Review, 33, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirri, K., & Laine, S. (2017). Ethical challenges in inclusive education: The case of gifted students. In Forlin, C. & Gajewski, A. (Eds.), Ethics, equity, and inclusive education (pp. 239–57). Bingley, England: Emerald.Google Scholar
Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2007). Comparison of academically average and gifted students’ self-rated ethical sensitivity. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirri, K., & Pehkonen, L. (2002). The moral reasoning and scientific argumentation of gifted adolescents. Prufrock Journal, 13(3), 120–9.Google Scholar
Tirri, K., Tolppanen, S., Aksela, M., & Kuusisto, E. (2012). A cross-cultural study of gifted students’ scientific, societal, and moral questions concerning science. Educational Research International, Vol. 2012, Article ID673645. doi: 10.1155/2012/673645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Westhuizen, C. N., & Maree, J. G. (2010). From human to humankind: Facilitating global awareness among the gifted. Gifted Education International, 27(1), 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Tassel-Baska, J. L. (2010). Patterns and profiles of promising learners from poverty. Waco, TX: Prufrock.Google Scholar
von Károlyi, C. (Ed.). 2008. Global awareness and giftedness [Special Issue]. Roeper Review 30(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London, England: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Wolin, S. (2008). Democracy incorporated: Managed democracy and the specter of inverted totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2014). Who's afraid of the big bad Dragon? Why China has the best (and worst) education system in the world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. & Gearin, B. (2016). Squeezed out: The threat of global homogenization of education to creativity. In Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Creative intelligence in the 21st century: Grappling with enormous problems and huge opportunities (pp. 121–38). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×