Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2011). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BAK Bundesassistentenkonferenz. (2009/1970). Forschendes Lernen – Wissenschaftliches Prüfen (Nachdruck der 2. Aufl.). Universitäts Verlag Webler.Google Scholar

Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change (Nov/Dec), 13–25.Google Scholar

Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.Google Scholar

Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide (universities into the 21st century). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Brew, A. (2013). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 101–114.Google Scholar

Deicke, W., & Mieg, H. A. (2020). Undergraduate research in German higher education: Tradition, policy, and innovation. In Hensel, N. & Blessinger, P. (Eds.), International perspectives on undergraduate research: Policy and practice (pp. 219–235). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. The Higher Education Academy. www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/developingundergraduate_final.pdfGoogle Scholar

Healey, M., Bovill, C., & Jenkins, A. (2015). Students as partners in learning. In Lea, J. (Ed.), Enhancing learning and teaching in higher education: Engaging with the dimensions of practice (pp. 141–163). Open University Press.Google Scholar

Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. (2012). How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning? Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 85–101.Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A. (2019a). Die Entwicklung forschungsnahen Lehren und Lernens und die Internationalisierungsperspektiven durch Forschendes Lernen / Undergraduate Research. Abschlussbericht zum Projekt “High Impact Learning” (Report on research-based learning for the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research, BMBWF).Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A. (2019b). Forms of research within strategies for implementing undergraduate research. ZfHE, 14(1), 79–94.Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A., & Dinter, J. (2017). Forschen im Forschenden Lernen: Der Einfluss von Forschungsform, Erkenntnisinteresse und Praxiskooperation. In Laitko, H., Mieg, H. A., & Parthey, H. (Eds.), Forschendes Lernen: Wissenschaftsforschung Jahrbuch 2016 (S. 29–50). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A., & Evetts, J. (2018). Professionalism, science, and expert roles: A social perspective. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 127–148). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A., & Lehmann, J. (Eds.). (2017). Forschendes Lernen: Wie die Lehre in Universität und Fachhochschule erneuert werden kann. Campus. English version: Mieg, H. A. (Ed.), Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research: The German multidisciplinary experience. Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0Google Scholar

Ouellette, D., Zottmann, J., Bolzer, M., Fischer, F., & Fischer, M. R. (2017). Investigating the interplay of epistemological beliefs and scientific reasoning and argumentation. In Laitko, H., Mieg, H., & Parthey, H. (Eds.), Forschendes Lernen: Wissenschaftsforschung Jahrbuch 2016 (pp. 71–86). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar

Rueß, J., Gess, C., & Deicke, W. (2016). Forschendes Lernen und forschungsbezogene Lehre – Empirisch begründete Systematisierung des Forschungsbezugs hochschulischer Lehre. ZfHE, 11(2), 23–44.Google Scholar

Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Wissenschaftsrat. (2012). Empfehlungen zur Weiterentwicklung der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland bis 2020. Wissenschaftsrat.Google Scholar

Bowers, J., & Parameswaran, A. (2013). Differentiating undergraduate research. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 453–464.Google Scholar

Braxton, J. (1996). Contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 90, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66, 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brew, A., & Mantai, L. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the challenges and barriers to implementing research-based experiences for undergraduates. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brint, S., Riddle, M., Turk-Bicakci, L., & Levy, C. (2005). From the liberal to the practical arts in American colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular change. Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 151–180.Google Scholar

Eagan, M., Hurtado, S., Chang, M., Garcia, G., Herrera, F., & Garibay, J. (2013). Making a difference in science education: The impact of undergraduate research programs. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 683–713.Google Scholar

Feldman, K. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26(3), 227–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fung, D., Besters-Dilger, J., & van der Vaart, R. (2017). Excellent education in research-rich universities. League of European Research Universities.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. (1996). The relationship between teaching and research: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humboldt, W. von. (1970). On the spirit and the organisational framework of intellectual institutions in Berlin. Minerva, 8, 242–250 (original written 1809/1810).Google Scholar

John, J., & Creighton, J. (2011). Researcher development: The impact of undergraduate research opportunity programmes on students in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 36(7), 781–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, C. (2001). The uses of the university (5th ed.). Harvard University Press (original work published 1963).Google Scholar

Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar

Marsh, H., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A. (2019). Introduction: Inquiry-based learning – Initial assessment. In Mieg, H. A. (Ed.), Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research: The German multidisciplinary experience (pp. 1–16). Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, J. L. (2018). Undergraduate research for student engagement and learning. Routledge.Google Scholar

Newman, J. (1976). The idea of a university defined and illustrated. (Ker, I., Ed.). Clarendon Press (original work published 1852).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olivares-Donoso, R., & Gonzalez, C. (2019). Undergraduate research or research-based courses: Which is most beneficial for science students? Research in Science Education, 49, 91–107.Google Scholar

Parker, J. (2018). Undergraduate research, learning gain and equity: The impact of final year research projects. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ridder-Symoens, H. de (Ed). (1992). A history of the university in Europe, Volume 1: Universities in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spronken-Smith, R., Mirosa, R., & Darrou, M. (2014). “Learning is an endless journey for anyone”: Undergraduate awareness, experiences and perceptions of the research culture in a research-intensive university. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(2), 355–371.Google Scholar

Stanford, J., Rocheleau, S., Smith, K., & Mohan, J. (2017). Early undergraduate research experiences lead to similar gains for STEM and non-STEM undergraduates. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tight, M. (2016). Examining the research/teaching nexus. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 293–311.Google Scholar

Tight, M. (2019). Mass higher education and massification. Higher Education Policy, 32(1), 93–108.Google Scholar

Turner, N., Wuetherick, B., & Healey, M. (2008). International perspectives on student awareness, experiences and perceptions of research: Implications for academic developers in implementing research-based teaching and learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 13(3), 199–211.Google Scholar

Webber, K., Nelson Laird, T., & BrckaLorenz, A. (2013). Student and faculty member engagement in undergraduate research. Research in Higher Education, 54, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimbardi, K., & Myatt, P. (2014). Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: A cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altrichter, H., & Reitinger, J. (2019). Analyse von Unterricht durch forschendes Lernen: Wie Lehrpersonen aus ihrem Unterricht lernen können [Analysis of lessons trough inquiry-based learning: How teachers can learn from their lessons]. In Kiel, E., Herzig, B., Maier, U., & Sandfuchs, U. (Eds.), Handbuch Unterrichten in allgemein-bildenden Schulen (pp. 475–485). Klinkhardt UTB.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.Google Scholar

Beck, C. W., & Blumer, L. S. (2012). Inquiry-based ecology laboratory courses improve student confidence and scientific reasoning skills. Ecosphere, 3(12). https://doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00280.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, J., & Parameswaran, A. (2013). Differentiating undergraduate research. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752731CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brew, A., & Saunders, C. (2020). Making sense of research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102935Google Scholar

Brownell, S. E., Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Singla, V., Chandler Seawell, P., Conklin Imam, J. F., Eddy, S. L., Stearns, T., & Cyert, M. S. (2015). A high-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092Google Scholar

Brownell, S. E., Kloser, M. J., Fukami, T., & Shavelson, R. (2012). Undergraduate biology lab courses: Comparing the impact of traditionally based “cookbook” and authentic research-based courses on student lab experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 36–45.Google Scholar

Cater, M., Ferstel, S. D., & O’Neil, C. E. (2016). Psychometric properties of the inventory of student experiences in undergraduate research. The Journal of General Education, 65(3–4), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.5325/jgeneeduc.65.3-4.0283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damşa, C. I., & Nerland, M. (2016). Student learning through participation in inquiry activities: Two case studies in teacher and computer engineering education. Vocations and Learning, 9(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186–016-9152-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627Google Scholar

Deicke, W., Gess, C., & Rueß, J. (2014). Increasing students’ research interests through research-based learning at Humboldt University. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 35(1), 27–33.Google Scholar

Dowd, J. E., Roy, C. P., Thompson, R. J., & Reynolds, J. A. (2015). “On course” for supporting expanded participation and improving scientific reasoning in undergraduate thesis writing. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500298rGoogle Scholar

Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Springer.Google Scholar

Egger, C., Miczajka, V., Bertsch, C., Ottlinger, T., & Mathiszik, J. (2020). Lehrerselbstwirksamkeit von Primarstufenstudierenden im Anleiten Forschenden Lernens. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung (ZfHE), 15(2), 167–186.Google Scholar

Engelmann, K., Neuhaus, B. J., & Fischer, F. (2016). Fostering scientific reasoning in education – meta-analytic evidence from intervention studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(5–6), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1240089Google Scholar

Feldman, A., Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2018). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315398822Google Scholar

Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., et al. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96Google Scholar

Furtmüller, G., Garaus, C., & Güttel, W. H. (2016). Even tiny rewards can motivate people to go the extra mile. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/06/even-tiny-rewards-can-motivate-people-to-go-the-extra-mileGoogle Scholar

Garaus, C., Furtmüller, G., & Güttel, W. H. (2015). The hidden power of small rewards: The effects of insufficient external rewards on autonomous motivation to learn. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gess, C., Wessels, I., & Blömeke, S. (2017). Domain-specificity of research competencies in the social sciences: Evidence from differential item functioning. Journal for Educational Research Online, 9(2), 11–36.Google Scholar

Hernandez, P. R., Woodcock, A., Estrada, M., & Schultz, P. W. (2018). Undergraduate research experiences broaden diversity in the scientific workforce. BioScience, 68(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofhues, S. (2019). Inquiry-based learning with digital media. In Mieg, H. A. (Ed.), Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research: The German multidisciplinary experience (pp. 375–401). Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0Google Scholar

Hung, D. (2002). Situated cognition and problem-based learning: Implications for learning and instruction with technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 393–415.Google Scholar

Kazura, K., & Tuttle, H. (2010). Research based learning approach: Students perspective of skills obtained. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(3), 210–215.Google Scholar

Khoukhi, A. (2013). A structured approach to honours undergraduate research course, evaluation rubrics, and assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 630–650.Google Scholar

Kreber, C. (2010). Academics’ teacher identities, authenticity and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 35(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307570902953048CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., Evers, A., & Meijs, C. (2019). The development of an instrument to measure teachers’ inquiry habit of mind. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 280–296.Google Scholar

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–26.Google Scholar

Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146–164. https://doi-org.uaccess.univie.ac.at/10.1159/000500171Google Scholar

Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9(4), 285–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kusurkar, R. A., Croiset, G., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2011). Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy-supportive classroom teaching derived from Self-Determination Theory. Medical Teacher, 33, 978–982.Google Scholar

Laurens, S., Hunter, A. B., Seymour, E., Thiry, H., & Melton, G. (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: Engaging students in real science. Wiley.Google Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991/2009). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Löhner, S., van Joolingen, W. R., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2005). Students’ reasoning during modeling in an inquiry learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.037Google Scholar

McDevitt, A. L., Patel, M. V., Rose, B., & Ellison, A. M. (2016). Insights into student gains from undergraduate research using pre- and post-assessments. BioScience, 66(12), 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw141Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A. (2019a). Forms of research within strategies for implementing undergraduate research. ZfHE, 14(1), 79–94.Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A. (Ed.). (2019b). Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research: The German multidisciplinary experience. Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-030–14223-0Google Scholar

Murray, J. L. (2017). Undergraduate research for student engagement and learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student–faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1998.0016Google Scholar

Olimpo, J. T. T., Pevey, R. S. S., & McCabe, T. M. M. (2019). Incorporating an interactive statistics workshop into an introductory biology Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) enhances students’ statistical reasoning and quantitative literacy skills. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1450Google Scholar

Ouellette, D., Zottmann, J., Bolzer, M., Fischer, F., & Fischer, M. R. (2017). Investigating the interplay of epistemological beliefs and scientific reasoning and argumentation. In Laitko, H., Mieg, H., & Parthey, H. (Eds.), Forschendes Lernen: Wissenschaftsforschung Jahrbuch 2016 (pp. 137–151). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar

Palmer, R. J., Hunt, A. N., Neal, M., & Wuetherick, B. (2015). Mentoring, undergraduate research, and identity development: A conceptual review and research agenda. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1126165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paseka, A., & Hinzke, J.-H. (2018). Professionalisierung durch Forschendes Lernen!? [Professional development through inquiry-based learning!?]. In Leonhard, T., Kosinár, J., & Reintjes, Ch. (Eds.), Praktiken und Orientierungen in der Lehrerbildung (pp. 191–206). Klinkhardt.Google Scholar

Patel, C. (2017). Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger’s Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Routledge.Google Scholar

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003Google Scholar

Reitinger, J. (2014). Beyond reflection: Thinking outside the box of a necessary but not sufficient condition for successful education in a heterogeneous world. In Hollick, D., Neißl, M., Kramer, M., & Reitinger, J. (Eds.), Heterogenität in pädagogischen Handlungsfeldern. Perspektiven. Befunde. Konzeptionelle Ansätze (pp. 39–59). Kassel University Press.Google Scholar

Reitinger, J. (2016). On the nature and empirical accessibility of inquiry learning: The Criteria of Inquiry Learning Inventory (CILI). In Reitinger, J., Haberfellner, C., Brewster, E., & Kramer, M. (Eds.), Theory of Inquiry Learning Arrangements: Research, reflection, and implementation (pp. 39–59). Kassel University Press.Google Scholar

Reitinger, J., Haberfellner, C., & Keplinger, G. (2016). An overview of the Theory of Inquiry Learning Arrangements (TILA). In Reitinger, J., Haberfellner, C., Brewster, E., & Kramer, M. (Eds.), Theory of Inquiry Learning Arrangements: Research, reflection, and implementation (pp. 1–12). Kassel University Press.Google Scholar

Rogers, M., & McDowell, W. G. (2015). Assessing the impact of undergraduate research on graduation rates at the University of Georgia. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 36(2), 33–38. Retrieved from www.cur.org/assets/1/7/summer08CroweBrakke1.PDFGoogle Scholar

Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316(5824), 548–549. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140384Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). An overview of Self-Determination Theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–36). University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Sadler, T. D., & McKinney, L. (2010). Scientific research for undergraduate students: A review of the literature. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(5), 43–49.Google Scholar

Saunders-Steward, K. S., Gyles, P. D. T., & Shore, B. M. (2012). Student outcomes in inquiry instruction: A literature-derived inventory. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11429860Google Scholar

Saunders-Steward, K. S., Gyles, P. D. T., Shore, B. M., & Bracewell, R. J. (2015). Student outcomes in inquiry: Students’ perspectives. Learning Environments Research, 18, 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984–015-9185-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seyfried, C., & Reitinger, J. (2013). Kompetenz und Reflexion: Zum Begriffsverständnis [Competence and reflection: Definitions]. In Weinberger, A. (Ed.), Reflexion im pädagogischen Kontext (pp. 59–70). LIT Verlag.Google Scholar

Seymour, E., Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10131Google Scholar

Shore, B. M., Chichekian, T., Syer, C. A., Aulls, M. W., & Frederiksen, C. H. (2011). Planning, enactment, and reflection in inquiry-based learning: Validating the McGill Strategic Demands of Inquiry Questionnaire. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763–011-9301-4Google Scholar

Taylor, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267110000301Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In Rieber, R. W., Wollock, J. L., & Veer, R. van der (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (pp. 233–343). Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Wayment, H. A., & Dickson, K. L. (2008). Increasing student participation in undergraduate research benefits students, faculty, and department. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 194–197.Google Scholar

Wessels, I., Gess, C., & Deicke, W. (2019). Competence development through inquiry-based learning. In Mieg, H. A. (Ed.), Inquiry-based learning –Undergraduate research: The German multidisciplinary experience (pp. 59–69). Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0Google Scholar

Wessels, I., Rueß, J., Jenßen, L., Gess, C., & Deicke, W. (2018). Beyond cognition: Experts’ views on affective-motivational research dispositions in the social sciences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(33). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01300Google Scholar

Weston, T. J., & Laursen, S. L. (2015). The Undergraduate Research Student Self-Assessment (URSSA): Validation for use in program evaluation. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-11-0206Google Scholar

Whipple, E. E., Hughes, A., & Bowden, S. (2015). Evaluation of a BSW research experience: Improving student research competency. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 35(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2015.1063568Google Scholar

Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658609Google Scholar

Wilson, A. E., Pollock, J. L., Billick, I., Domingo, C., Fernandez-Figueroa, E. G., Nagy, E. S., Steury, T. D., & Summers, A. (2018). Assessing science training programs: Structured undergraduate research programs make a difference. BioScience, 68(7), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy052Google Scholar

Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 276–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolf, L. W. (2018). Undergraduate research as engaged student learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2018(154), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20293Google Scholar

Wulf, C. (2019). “From teaching to learning”: Characteristics and challenges of a student-centered learning culture. In Mieg, H. A. (Ed.), Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research: The German multidisciplinary experience (pp. 47–55). Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0Google Scholar

Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Babich, B. (2003). From Fleck’s Denkstil to Kuhn’s paradigm: Conceptual schemes and incommensurability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17(1), 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachelard, G. (1934). La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Librairie philosophique J. Vin.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: One concept, two hills to climb. In Tan, S. C., So, H. J., & Yeo, J. (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 35–52). Springer.Google Scholar

Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 3–18.Google Scholar

Cunningham, C., & Kelly, G. (2017). Epistemic practices of engineering for education. Science Education, 101(3), 486–505.Google Scholar

Damşa, C. I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2016). Learning through interaction and co-construction of knowledge objects in teacher education. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 11, 1–18.Google Scholar

Damşa, C. I., & Nerland, M. (2016). Student participation in inquiry activities in higher education: Domain-specific characteristics and challenges. Vocations and Learning, 9(3), 275–294.Google Scholar

Damşa, C., Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2017). Enrolment of first-year students in knowledge domains: Unpacking transformative practices in three introductory courses. In Kyndt, E., Donche, V., Trigwell, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (Eds.), Higher education transitions: Theory and research (pp. 270–287). Routledge.Google Scholar

Feldman, A., Divoll, K., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2013). Becoming researchers: The participation of undergraduate and graduate students in scientific research groups. Science Education, 97(2), 218–243.Google Scholar

Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. University of Chicago Press (original work published in German 1935).Google Scholar

Fleck, L. (2011/1960). Krise in der Wissenschaft. Zu einer freien und menschlicheren Wissenschaft. In Denkstile und Tatsachen: Gesammelte Schriften und Zeugnisse (pp. 466–474). Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Fleck, L. (2011). Über die wissenschaftliche Beobachtung und die Wahrnehmung im allgemeinen. In Denkstile und Tatsachen: Gesammelte Schriften und Zeugnisse (pp. 211–238). Suhrkamp (original work published 1935).Google Scholar

Hasse, C. (2015). An anthropology of learning. SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, K., Nerland, M., & Enqvist-Jensen, C. (2015). Enrolment of newcomers in expert cultures: An analysis of epistemic practices in a legal education introductory course. Higher Education, 70(5), 867–880.Google Scholar

Kelly, G. (2011). Scientific literacy, discourse, and epistemic practices. In Linder, C., Östman, L., Roberts, D. A., Wickman, P., Erikson, G., & McKinnon, A. (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy. Routledge.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In Knorr Cetina, K., Schatzki, T. R., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). Routledge.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (2007a). Knowledge in a knowledge society: Five transitions. Knowledge, Work and Society, 4(3), 25–42.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (2007b). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361–375.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K., & Reichmann, W. (2015). Professional epistemic cultures. In Langemeyer, I., Fischer, M., & Pfadenhauer, M. (Eds.), Epistemic and learning cultures – woher und wohin sich Universitäten entwickeln. Juventa Verlag.Google Scholar

Kuhn, D. (1997). The view from giants’ shoulders. In Smith, L., Dockrell, J., & Tomlinson, P. (Eds.), Piaget, Vygotsky & beyond: Central issues in developmental psychology and education (pp. 187–197). Routledge.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Langemeyer, I. (2015). Das Wissen der Achtsamkeit. Kooperative Kompetenz in komplexen Arbeitsprozessen. Waxmann.Google Scholar

Langemeyer, I. (2019a). Models for investigating and developing research-driven learning in science education. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 20(1), 71–94.Google Scholar

Langemeyer, I. (2019b). Mindfulness in cooperation and the psychodynamics in high-reliability organizations. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 16, 1237–1257.Google Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Epistemic fluency and professional education: Innovation, knowledgeable action and actionable knowledge. Springer.Google Scholar

Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Insights into the dynamics between changes in professional fields and teaching in higher education. Paper presented at the 17th Biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction: Education in the Crossroads of Economy and Politics Role of Research in the Advancement of Public Good. 27 August–2 September 2017. Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar

Mieg, H., & Evetts, J. (2018). Professionalism, science and expert roles: A social perspective. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 127–150). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nerland, M. (2018). Knowledge practices and relations in professional education. Studies in Continuing Education, 40(3), 242–256.Google Scholar

Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Epistemic practices and object relations in professional work. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 101–120.Google Scholar

Neuweg, G. H. (1999). Könnerschaft und implizites Wissen. Zur lehr- und lerntheoretischen Bedeutung der Erkenntnis- und Wissenstheorie Michael Polanyis. Waxmann.Google Scholar

Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1961). Faith and reason. The Journal of Religion, 41(4), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Stetsenko, A. (2016). The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to development and education. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vianna, E., Hougaard, N., & Stetsenko, A. (2014). The dialectics of collective and individual transformation: Transformative activist research in a collaborative learning community project. In Blunden, A. (Ed.), Collaborative projects: An interdisciplinary study (pp. 59–88). Brill.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speaking. In Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S. (Eds.), The collected works of Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (Minick, N., Trans.). Plenum (original work published 1934).Google Scholar

Aristotle. (1890). The ethics of Aristotle: With introductory essay by George Henry-Lewes (The Nicomachean Ethics). (Chase, D. P., Trans. newly revised) (pp. 173–200). Walter Scott Publishing Co. (original work published in ancient Greek ca. BCE 350).Google Scholar

Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar

Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of super-complexity. Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar

Barnett, R. (2008). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar

Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.Google Scholar

Boker, J. (2012). University of the future: A thousand year old industry on the cusp of profound change. Ernst & Young.Google Scholar

Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2016). Cultivating student–staff partnerships through research and practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 1–3.Google Scholar

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton University.Google Scholar

Brew, A. (2001). The nature of research: Inquiry in academic contexts. Routledgefalmer Research.Google Scholar

Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603–618.Google Scholar

Bronstein, D. (2016). Aristotle on knowledge and learning: The Posterior Analytics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, A. F. (1980). What is this thing called Science? The Open University Press.Google Scholar

Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2008). Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1998). The Golem: What you should know about science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comte, A. (1971). The positive philosophy (Martineau, H. & Chapman, J., Trans., 1853). Reprinted in Thompson, K. & Tunstall, J. (Eds.), Sociological perspectives (pp. 18–32). The Open University Press.Google Scholar

Connell, R. (2020). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Routledge.Google Scholar

Connell, R. (2019). The good university: What universities actually do and why it’s time for radical change. Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (1962). A discourse on method meditations and principles (Veitch, J., Trans.). Dent (original work published in French 1637).Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1976). Experience and education. Collier Macmillan (first published in 1938).Google Scholar

Donald, W. E., Baruch, Y., & Ashleigh, M. (2019). The undergraduate self-perception of employability: Human capital, careers advice, and career ownership. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 599–614.Google Scholar

Elton, L. (2000). Research and teaching: Conditions for a positive link. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 43–56.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. (1970). Consolations for the specialist. In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, T. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 197–230). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.Google Scholar

Gibbs, P. (2015). Transdisciplinarity as epistemology, ontology or principles of practical judgement. In Gibbs, P. (Ed.), Transdisciplinary professional learning and practice (pp. 151–164). Springer.Google Scholar

Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Greco, P. (2002). Virtues in epistemology. In Moser, P. K. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of epistemology (pp. 287–315). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542.Google Scholar

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1–13.Google Scholar

Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Harvester.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1973). The idea of phenomenology. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1961). The critique of pure reason (Abridged, ed.). Macmillan (original work published in German 1781).Google Scholar

Karukstis, K. K., & Elgren, T. E. (2007). Developing and sustaining a research-supportive curriculum: A compendium of successful practices. The Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Maxwell, N. (1984). From knowledge to wisdom: A revolution in the aims and methods of science. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Maxwell, N. (2014). How universities can help create a wiser world: The urgent need for an academic revolution. Andrews UK.Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A. (2019a). Forms of research within strategies for engaging in undergraduate research. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 14(1) 79–94.Google Scholar

Mieg, H. A. (Ed.) (2019b). Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research. The German multidisciplinary experience. Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Ozmon, H., & Craver, S. (1990). Philosophical foundations of education (4th ed.). Merrill Macmillan.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1980). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson (original work published in German 1934).Google Scholar

Reiss, M. J., & Straughan, S. (2001). Improving nature? The science and ethics of genetic engineering. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Robertson, J. (2001). Human embryonic stem cell research: Ethical and legal issues. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2(1), 74–78.Google Scholar

Sosa, E. (2007). A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Trowler, P. P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (Eds.). (2012). Tribes and territories in the twenty-first century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimbardi, K., & Myatt, P. (2014). Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: A cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 233–250.Google Scholar