Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Nature of Translation
- 1 Theories of Translation
- 2 The Translation Process
- 3 Translation and Technology
- 4 Self-Translation
- 5 Translated Text
- Part II Translation in Society
- Part III Translation in Company
- Part IV Translation in Practice: Factual Genres
- Part V Translation in Practice: Arts
- Part VI Translation in History
- Index
- References
5 - Translated Text
from Part I - The Nature of Translation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2022
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Nature of Translation
- 1 Theories of Translation
- 2 The Translation Process
- 3 Translation and Technology
- 4 Self-Translation
- 5 Translated Text
- Part II Translation in Society
- Part III Translation in Company
- Part IV Translation in Practice: Factual Genres
- Part V Translation in Practice: Arts
- Part VI Translation in History
- Index
- References
Summary
Chapter 5 discusses claims that different norms govern translation and the nature of translated text in different temporal and geographical contexts, and that translated texts differ from first-written texts. It considers the troubled relationship between the notions of norms and translation universals, and addresses the question of what constitutes a translation ‘proper’, and what characterizes the task a translator takes on when translating a piece of literature. It gives an account of the variety of approaches and attitudes taken to this task since Ancient Roman times, through to the work of Gideon Toury on translation laws and later developments that this has inspired, including work on norms, the nature of translated text, and translation universals. Translations and retranslations into English of Henrik Ibsen’s plays are used for purposes of illustration.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation , pp. 96 - 116Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Assis Rosa, A. (2012). Translating place: Linguistic variation in translation. Word and text. Journal of Literary Studies and Linguistics, 2(2), 75–97.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1996). Corpus-based translation studies: The challenges that lie ahead. In Somers, H., ed., Terminology, LSP and Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.175–86.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1986). Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation. Reprinted in Venuti, L., ed. (2001). The Translation Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 298–313 from J. House and S. Blum-Kulka, eds., Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Chesterman, A. (2004). Beyond the particular. In Mauranen, A. and Kujamäkki, P., eds., Translation Universals, Do They Exist? Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
D’Amico, G. (2011). Marketing Ibsen: A study of the First Italian Reception, 1883–1891. Ibsen Studies, 11(2), 145–75.Google Scholar
D’Amico, G. (2013). Domesticating Ibsen for Italy. PhD thesis. Università degli Studi di Torino.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B. (2014). About phonological, grammatical, and semantic accents in bilinguals’ language use and their cause. In Filipovíc, L. and Pütz, M., eds., Multilingual Cognition and Language Use: Processing and Typological Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 229–62.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (2003). Mouse or Rat? Translation as Negotiation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Eikli, R. (2019). (Member of the Norwegian Translators’ Association) Personal communication.Google Scholar
Englund Dimitrova, B. (2004). Orality, literacy, reproduction of discourse and the translation of dialect. In Helin, I., ed., Dialektübersetzung und Dialekt in Multimedia. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 121–39.Google Scholar
Epstein, B. J. (2014). Are there blacks in Europe? How African-American characters are (or are not) translated. In Epstein, B. J., ed., True North: Literary Translation in the Nordic Countries. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp.84–98.Google Scholar
Frawley, W. (1984). Translation, Literary, Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Halverson, S. L. (2017). Gravitational pull in translation: Testing a revised model. In de Sutter, G., Lefer, M.-A. and Delaere, I., eds., Empirical Translation Studies. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp.9–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, W. G., and Scull, C. (2005). The Lord of the Rings: A Reader’s Companion. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Hansen-Schirra, S., Neumann, S., and Steiner, E. (2012). Cross-Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, C. T. R. (1995). St Jerome’s Hebrew Questions on Genesis (translation). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, T. (1996). The translator’s voice in translated narrative. Target, 8(1), 23–49.Google Scholar
House, J. (1997). Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Re-visited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Leppihalme, R. (2000). The two faces of standardization: On the translation of regionalisms in literary dialogue. The Translator, 6(2), 247–69.Google Scholar
Malmkjær, K. (2003). Et lingvistisk perspektiv på litterær oversettelse (from English: A linguistic perspective on literary translation. Trans. B. Behrens). In Behrens, B. and Christensen, B., eds., Oversettelse i teori og praksis. Oslo: Novus, pp. 55–89.Google Scholar
Malmkjær, K. (2004). Translational stylistics. Language and Literature, 13(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmkjær, K. (2012). Translation universals. In Malmkjær, K. and Windle, K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Translation Studies, Online.Google Scholar
Olohan, M., and Baker, M. (2000). Reporting that in translated English: Evidence for subconscious processes of explicitation? Across Languages and Cultures, 1(2), 141–58.Google Scholar
Øverås, L. (1998). In search of the third code: An investigation of norms in literary translation. Meta, 43(4), 571–88.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pym, A. (2015). Translating as risk management. Journal of Pragmatics, 85, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rem, T. (2019). Introduction to Henrik Ibsen. A Doll’s House and Other Plays. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rogde, I. (1984). Translator’s preface to Alice Walker: Fargen bortenfor (The Color Purple). Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. (1838). Über die verschiedenen Methoden des Übersetzens. In Sämtliche Werke, vol. II. Berlin, pp.201–38.Google Scholar
Skogmo, S. F. (2015). Marked Language in Norwegian Literary Text. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo. Oslo: Akademika.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2004). Relating narrative events in translation. In Ravid, D. and Shyldkrot, H. B., eds., Perspectives on Language and Language Development: Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Smith, Z. (2000/2001). White Teeth / Hvite tenner. Norwegian trans. by T. Sjøgren Erichsen. Oslo: Aschehough & Co.Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, M. (2003). Re-creating the hybrid text: Postcolonial Indian writings and the European scene. Linguistica Antwerpiensia. New Series, 2, 173–89.Google Scholar
Soovik, E.-R. (2006). Translating the translated: Arundhati Roy and Salman Rushdie in Estonian. In Granqvist, R., ed., Writing Back in/and Translation. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 155–65.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Teich, E. (1999). System-oriented and text-oriented comparative linguistic research: Crosslinguistic variation in translation. Languages in Contrast, 2(2), 187–210.Google Scholar
Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Venuti, L. (2007). Translation, community and utopia. In Venuti, L., ed., The Translation Studies Reader. 2nd ed. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 482–502.Google Scholar
Vermeer, H. J. (1989). Skopos and commission in translational action. Trans. A. Chesterman. In Venuti, L., ed. (2000). The Translation Studies Reader. London: Routledge, pp.221–32.Google Scholar
Wikimedia Commons (October 2016). https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Le_Corbeau_(The_Raven)_by_Edgar_Allan_Poe.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by