Feminist Theory and Methodologies

2 - Feminist Theory and Methodologies

Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries

from Section 1 - The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 July 2020

Rekha Pande ,

Wen Liu and

Hsunhui Tseng

Edited by

Fanny M. Cheung and

Diane F. Halpern

Show author details

Fanny M. Cheung: Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Diane F. Halpern: Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

“Women’s Studies, Gender Studies, Feminist Studies,” with the theme of the subordination of women, is marked by diverse and overlapping intellectual traditions and movements. We take a non-Western perspective of this diversity. We use the terms interchangeably, as in the historical development from the earlier focus on Women’s Studies and more recent shift to Gender Studies in the West as well as in third world Women’s Studies, these disciplines have a close relationship with Feminism and the Women’s Movement and have gained from each other.The chapter covers issues including the Women’s Movements, Women’s Studies/Feminism, the different waves of feminism, feminist perspectives, feminist research / feminist methods, objectivity for feminist research and feminist theories. We cover theory and method for social science in general, but there is a section that features psychology specifically and highlights the different strands of feminism.

Keywords

Women’s Studies gender studies feminist studies feminism Women’s Movement feminist perspectives feminist research feminist methods feminist theories androcentric view intersectionality

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women , pp. 14 - 26

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108561716 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suggested Readings

Rekha Pande is the Head and founding member of the Centre for Women’s Studies and a Professor and former Head of the Department of History at the University of Hyderabad, India. She was also the founding member of the Center for Women’s Studies at Maulana Azad National Urdu University. She chaired the 12th Women’s World Congress in India, 2014. She has been a visiting Professor at University of London, University of Bristol, University of Buffalo, Maison de Research, Paris, and University of Artois. Her work is in the interdisciplinary area of history and women’s studies. She has published eighteen books and over a hundred papers and chapters in national and international journals, proceedings and books. She has been the editor of International Feminist Journal of Politics (IFJP) and Foreign Policy Analysis. Pande was born in northern India in the Himalayan region of the present state of Uttrakhand. As her father was an Indian Army officer who was posted every three years, she grew up in different states of India. During the early stage of her career, she spent summer and winter vacations visiting her husband who is a scientist working in Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Uganda. She now spends her summers visiting her children who have settled in the United States.

Wen Liu is Assistant Professor of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at University at Albany, State University of New York. Liu is currently working on a book titled Assembling Asian American: Psychological technologies and queer subjectivities, where she draws from queer theory, affect, and diasporic postcolonial studies to examine how psychology as a scientific discipline has created Asian Americanness as a measurable, biocultural population through a Eurocentric gaze. Her research has been published in internationally recognized journals such as Feminism & Psychology, Subjectivity, American Quarterly, and Journal of Asian American Studies. She is currently co-editing a special issue on “Feminisms and decolonizing psychology” for the journal Feminism & Psychology. Liu was born in Taipei, Taiwan, and moved to the USA when she was 16 where she studied and stayed on for her career. She still strongly considers herself as a Taiwanese person politically, and identifies as a queer person of color.

Hsunhui Tseng is Assistant Professor in the Gender Studies Programme at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include globalization, marriage and family, transnational migration and human trafficking, student mobility, gender, class and race, identity politics, Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, and Southeast Asia. She is working on a manuscript tentatively titled Stratified foreign bodies: Commodified transnational marriage and the brokerage industry in Taiwan. Her works appear in journals such as Asian Anthropology, Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Cultural Review, and Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences. The courses she teaches at CUHK cover feminist methodology, gendered migration in Asia, family and society, and the intersectionality of gender, sexuality, and race throughout the world. Tseng was born in Taiwan where she attended her undergraduate studies and then went to the United States where she obtained her master’s and PhD degrees at the University of Washington, Seattle. She is currently a single mother working in Hong Kong.

Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology. London: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1987) (Ed.). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

Tong, R., & Botts, T. F. (2018). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (5th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

References

Angeloff, T., & Lieber, M. (2012). Equality, did you say? Chinese feminism after 30 years of reforms. China Perspectives, 2012(4), 17–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Banerjee, N. K. (1995). “Grassroots empowerment (1975–1990).” (Mimeograph.) New Delhi: Center for Women’s Development Studies. http://www.cwds.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GrassrootEmpowerment.pdf Google Scholar

Basu, M. (2013). The girl whose rape changed a country [documentary]. United States: CNN.Google Scholar

Biggs, S., Phillipson, C., Leach, R., & Money, A. M. (2008). The mature imagination and consumption strategies: Age and generation in the development of a United Kingdom baby boomer identity. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 2(2), 31–59. doi:10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.072231Google Scholar

Bolotin, S. (1982). Voices from the post feminist generation, The New York Times Magazine, October 17. www.nytimes.com/1982/10/17/magazine/voices-from-the-post-feminist-generation.html Google Scholar

Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology (Gender and Psychology). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446279243CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen, P. (2004). Acting otherwise: The institutionalization of women’s/gender studies in Taiwan’s universities. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203463789Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., & Chung, P. (2009). Central mechanisms: The Equal Opportunities Commission and the Women’s Commission. In Cheung, F. M. & Holroyd, E. (Eds.), Mainstreaming gender in Hong Kong society (pp. 369–400). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar

Chiang, L. H. (1995). Women’s movement, women’s studies. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 1(1), 152–159. doi:10.1080/12259276.1995.11665772Google Scholar

Crouch, B. (2012). Finding a voice in the academy: The history of women’s studies in higher education. Vermont Connection, 33(3), 16–23.Google Scholar

Desai, N., Dube, L., Mazumdar, V., Sharma, K., & Kelkar, G. (1984). Women’s studies and the social sciences: A report from India. Women’s Studies International, 3, 2–6.Google Scholar

Ding, N. (2010). Prostitutes, parasites and the house of state feminism. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 1(2), 305–318. doi:10.1080/14649370050141177CrossRef Google Scholar

DuBois, E. (1997). Harriot Stanton Blatch and the winning of woman suffrage. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fraisse, G. (1995), as quoted in Freedman, J. (2002). Feminisms. New Delhi: Viva Books.Google Scholar

Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gillis, S., Howie, G., & Munford, R. (2004). Third wave feminism: A critical exploration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230523173Google Scholar

Glazer-Malbin, N., & Waehrer, H. Y. (1971). Women in a man-made world. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Guha, R. (2013). The past & present of Indian environmentalism. The Hindu, March 27, 2013.Google Scholar

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. Feminist Studies 14(3, 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066Google Scholar

Harding, S. (Ed.) (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? Centennial Review, 36(3), 437–440.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1995). “Strong objectivity”: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, 104(3), 331–349. doi:10.1007/BF01064504Google Scholar

Harding, S. (2003). How standpoint methodology informs philosophy of social science. In Turner, S. P. ad Roth, P. A. (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of the social sciences (pp. 291–310). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470756485.ch12Google Scholar

Hartsock, N. C. (1987). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding, (Ed.), Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hegarty, P. (2011). Becoming curious: An invitation to the special issue on queer theory and psychology. Psychology & Sexuality, 2(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/19419899.2011.536308Google Scholar

Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (2010). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

India, Ministry of Education and Social Welfare. (1975 ). Towards equality: Report of the Committee on the Status of Women. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar

Jackson, S. (2016). Women’s studies, gender studies and feminism. Discover Society, 30. discoversociety.org/2016/03/01/womens-studies-gender-studies-and-feminism/Google Scholar

Jaggar, A. M. (1989). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In A. M. Jaggar, and Bordo, S. (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (pp. 145–171). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Kramarae, C., & Spender, D. (1993). The knowledge explosion: Generation of feminist scholarship. London: Harrvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Krishnaraj, M. (1986). Research on women and career: Issues of methodologies. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(43), WS67–WS74.Google Scholar

Krishnaraj, M. (1988) “How has women’s studies been defined?” (Mimeograp.) Workshop on definition of women’s studies. Bombay: Tata Institute of Social Science.Google Scholar

Lim, A. (2015). Transnational feminism and women’s movements in post-1997 Hong Kong: Solidarity beyond the state. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. doi:10.5790/hongkong/9789888139378.001.0001Google Scholar

Liu, L., Karl, R., & Ko, D. (2013). The birth of Chinese feminism: Essential texts in transnational theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Liu, W. (2017). Toward a queer psychology of affect: Restarting from shameful places. Subjectivity, 10(1), 44–62. doi:10.1057/s41286-016-0014-6CrossRef Google Scholar

Lorde, A. (1980). Age, race, class, and sex: Women redefining difference. In B. Scott, , Cayleff, S., Donadey, A., & Lara, I. (Eds.), Women in culture: An intersectional anthology for gender and women’s studies (pp. 16–22). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Maynard, M. (1998). Women’s studies. In Jackson, S. and Jones, J. (Eds.), Contemporary feminist theories (pp. 247–258). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Minton, H. L. (1997). Queer theory: Historical roots and implications for psychology. Theory & Psychology, 7(3), 337–353.Google Scholar

Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In H. Roberts, (Eds.), Doing feminist research (pp. 8–18). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2000). From anti-arrack to total prohibition: The women’s movement in Andhra Pradesh, India. Gender, Technology and Development, 4(1), 131–144. doi:10.1177/097185240000400109Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2001). The social costs of globalization: Restructuring developing world economies. Journal of Asian Women’s Studies, 10, 1–14.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2002). The public face of a private domestic violence. International Feminist Journal, 4(3), 342–367. doi:10.1080/1461674022000031535Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2003). Eco-feminism: Making connections between feminism and ecology. The Eastern Ghats, ENVIS, Newsletter, Environment Protection Training and Research Institute, 9(1), 7–8. www.academia.edu/3716746/Eco-Feminism_making_connections_between_Feminism_and_Ecology_Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2004). Engendering university curricula and teaching women’s studies in India – A critical evaluation. In R. Pande (Ed.), The indigenization of women’s studies teaching: The Asian Experience (pp. 52–82). Beijing: Contemporary China Publishing House, 52-82.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2013). Women’s studies: An institutional experience. Women’s Link, 19(2), 2–9.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2015). Indology and the women’s question: Discourses on women’s status-traditional past and continuing modern discourses. Manas, Studies into Asia and Africa. Electronic Journal of the Centre for Eastern Languages and Cultures, 2(1). http://manas.bg/en/tradition-and-modernity-indian-culture/indologiyata-i-zhenskata-problematika-diskursi-vrhu-statuta-na-zhenata Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2018a). Role of women in the early environment movements in India. In Z. M. Bora, and Sivaramakrishnan, M. (Eds.), Narratives of environmental challenges in Brazil and India: Losing nature (pp. 157–175). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2018b). The forgotten widows of Vrindawan. In R. Pande, and Weide, T. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural perspectives on gender and aging (pp. 200–216). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

Panikkar, K. N. (1975). Presidential address: Section III. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, thirty-sixth session, Aligarh, (pp. 365–399). www.jstor.org/stable/44138863?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Google Scholar

Phillips, M. (2004). The ascent of woman: A history of the suffragette movement and the ideas behind it. London: Abacus.Google Scholar

Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. New Delhi: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446278901Google Scholar

Plummer, K., Kong, T., & Mahoney, D. (2001). Queering the interview. In Gubrium, Jaber F. & Holstein, James A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & methods (pp. 239–259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Pollitt, K. (1995). Reasonable creatures: Essays on women and feminism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Poonacha, V. (2003). Women’s studies in Indian universities: Current concerns. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(26), 2653–2658.Google Scholar

Rattansi, A., & Phoenix, A. (2005). Rethinking youth identities: Modernist and postmodernist frameworks. In Bynner, J., Chisholm, L., & Fyrlong, A. (Eds.), Youth, citizenship and social change in a European context. Aldershot: Ashgate. Reprinted in Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 5(2), 97–123.Google Scholar

Rege, S. (1998). Dalit women talk differently – A critique of difference and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(44), WS39–WS46.Google Scholar

Reid, C. J. Jr. (2012). The journey to Seneca Falls: Mary Wollstonecraft, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the legal emancipation of women. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 10, 1123.Google Scholar

Richardson, D., Robinson, V., & Campling, J. (Eds.). (1993). Introducing women’s studies: Feminist theory and practice. London: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-22595-8Google Scholar

Rosen, R. (2000). The world split open: How the modern women’s movement changed America. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Tharu, S., ＆ Niranjana, T. (1994). Problems for a contemporary theory of gender. Social Scientist, 22(3/4), 93–117. doi:10.2307/3517624Google Scholar

Tong, R. (1998). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Tuchman, G., Daniels, A. K., & Benét, J. W. (1978). Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

UNESCO. (1983). Women’s studies and social sciences in Asia: Report of a meeting of experts. New Delhi: Centre for Women’s Development Studies.Google Scholar

United Nations. (1976). Report of the World Conference of the International Women’s Year. New York. www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/otherconferences/Mexico/Mexico%20conference%20report%20optimized.pdf Google Scholar

Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (1994). The social construction of heterosexuality. Journal of Gender Studies, 3(3), 307–316. doi:10.1080/09589236.1994.9960578CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilton, T. (1993). Queer subjects: Lesbians, heterosexual women and the academy. In Kennedy, M., Lubelska, C., & Walsh, V. (Eds.), Making connections: Women’s studies, women’s movements and women’s lives (pp. 167–179). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Woodward, K., & Woodward, S. (2015). Gender studies and interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 1. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2015.18Google Scholar

Zeng, J. Y. (2015). Zhongguo nüquan zhuyi sanshi’nian [Chinese feminism for the past 30 years]. theinitium.com/article/20150924-opinion-china-feminism/Google Scholar

Book contents

2 - Feminist Theory and Methodologies

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Suggested Readings

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive