Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them
- Section 2 Developmental Perspectives of the International Psychology of Women
- Section 3 Cognitive and Social Factors
- 10 Sex, Gender, and Intelligence
- 11 At the Crossroads of Women’s Experience
- 12 Gender and Personality Research in Psychology
- 13 Selfhood and Self-Construal
- 14 Cultural Influences on Body Image and Body Esteem
- 15 The Not So Subtle and Status Quo Maintaining Nature of Everyday Sexism
- 16 A Gendered Light on Empathy, Prosocial Behavior, and Forgiveness
- 17 The Impact of Gender and Culture in Consumer Behavior
- 18 Evolutionary Roots of Women’s Aggression
- Section 4 Work and Family Issues
- Section 5 Inequality and Social Justice
- Section 6 Health and Well-Being
- Epilogue Some Final Thoughts and Take-Home Messages
- Index
- References
18 - Evolutionary Roots of Women’s Aggression
Causes, Contexts, and Consequences
from Section 3 - Cognitive and Social Factors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 July 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them
- Section 2 Developmental Perspectives of the International Psychology of Women
- Section 3 Cognitive and Social Factors
- 10 Sex, Gender, and Intelligence
- 11 At the Crossroads of Women’s Experience
- 12 Gender and Personality Research in Psychology
- 13 Selfhood and Self-Construal
- 14 Cultural Influences on Body Image and Body Esteem
- 15 The Not So Subtle and Status Quo Maintaining Nature of Everyday Sexism
- 16 A Gendered Light on Empathy, Prosocial Behavior, and Forgiveness
- 17 The Impact of Gender and Culture in Consumer Behavior
- 18 Evolutionary Roots of Women’s Aggression
- Section 4 Work and Family Issues
- Section 5 Inequality and Social Justice
- Section 6 Health and Well-Being
- Epilogue Some Final Thoughts and Take-Home Messages
- Index
- References
Summary
From an evolutionary perspective, aggression is viewed as a flexible context-specific adaption that was selected for because it enhanced the survival and reproductive success of ancestral humans. Evolutionary pressures have impinged differentially on the sexes, leading to the hypothesis that sex differences should be manifest in aggressive behavior. Evidence to date supports key predictions made from sexual selection theory that women direct their aggression primarily toward same-sex competitors, which peaks as mate competition intensifies. Women demonstrate a notable preference across cultures for more indirect, as opposed to direct, forms of intrasexual rivalry as a likely consequence of heightened obligatory parental investment, lower lifetime reproductive potential, and the greater importance of maternal survival for the health and longevity of offspring. An evolutionary approach can yield unique insights into the sex-differentiated functions, development, and outcomes of aggressive behavior.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women , pp. 258 - 272Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Suggested Readings
Adam Davis is currently enrolled in a PhD program in Education at the University of Ottawa. His principal research interests involve using an evolutionary perspective, particularly sexual selection theory, to study dark personality traits, jealousy, and aggressive behavior among adolescents and young adults. His secondary program of research is focused around studying the links between cognitive styles, environmental values, and pro-environmental behavior. Davis was born in Ontario, Canada where he has lived his entire life. He has spent two weeks in Honduras during graduate school helping graduate students with behavioral ecology research on howler monkeys. He identifies himself as atheist, democratic socialist, and feminist.
Tracy Vaillancourt is a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in School-Based Mental Health and Violence Prevention at the University of Ottawa where she is cross-appointed as a Full Professor in Counselling Psychology and the School of Psychology. She is also an elected member of the College of the Royal Society of Canada. She received her BA, MA, and PhD from the University of British Columbia (human development), her postdoctoral diploma from the University of Montreal and Laval University (developmental psychology), and postdoctoral respecialization in applied child psychology (clinical) from McGill University. Vaillancourt’s research examines the links between bullying and mental health, with a particular focus on social neuroscience. She is currently funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada.
John Archer is an Emeritus Professor at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston. He has been an active researcher in the field of aggressive behavior for more than 40 years, focusing his research on aggression and violence and, in particular, sex differences in aggression, including in relation to sexual selection, partner violence, the relations between testosterone and aggression, and resource holding power and aggression. Archer served as the editor-in-chief of Aggressive Behavior from 2012 to 2018. He was recipient of the John Paul Scott Award from the International Society for Research on Aggression (ISRA) in 2016, and was made a Life Fellow of ISRA in 2018 “in recognition of his distinguished lifetime contribution to research on aggression.” Born in Windsor, UK, he went to University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, for his undergraduate degree and University of Bristol for his PhD.
Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–311. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990951Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Sexual competition among women: A review of the theory and supporting evidence. In Fisher, M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 25–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 16–26. doi:10.1080/0022449040 9552210Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 368(1631). doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0080Google ScholarPubMed
Vaillancourt, T., & Krems, J. A. (2018). An evolutionary psychological perspective of indirect aggression in girls and women. In Coyne, S. & Ostrov, J. (Eds.), The development of relational aggression (pp. 111–126). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190491826.003.0008Google Scholar
References
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.5.651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 313–351. doi:10.1016/ S1359–1789(01)00061-1Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 133–153. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_3Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–311. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990951Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2013). Can evolutionary principles explain patterns of family violence? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 403–440. doi:10.1037/a0029114Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2018). Violence to partners: Gender symmetry revisited. In Ireland, J. L., Ireland, C. A., & Burch, P. (Eds.), International handbook on aggression (pp. 155–169). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2019). The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biological Reviews, 94, 1381–1415. doi:10.1111/brv.12507Google Scholar
Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2Google Scholar
Arnocky, S. (2016). Intrasexual rivalry among women. In: Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–8). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1424-1Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., & Piché, T. (2014). Cosmetic surgery as intrasexual competition: The mediating role of social comparison. Psychology, 5, 1197–1205. doi:10.4236/psych.2014.510132Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R. S., & Knack, J. M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate-guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 45–64. doi:10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.3Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness and females’ indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19, 290–303. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01362.xGoogle Scholar
Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Mate-poaching and mating success in humans. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 65–83. doi:10.1556/JEP.11.2013.2.2Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). A multi-informant longitudinal study on the relationship between aggression, peer victimization, and dating status in adolescence. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 253–270. doi:10.1177/147470491201000207Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Sexual competition among women: A review of the theory and supporting evidence. In Fisher, M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 25–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benenson, J. F. (2013). The development of human female competition: Allies and adversaries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 368(1631). doi:10.1098/rstb. 2013.0079Google Scholar
Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Hultgren, B., Nguyen, T., Bullock, G., & Wrangham, R. (2013). Social exclusion: More important to human females than males. PLoS One, 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055851Google Scholar
Benzeval, M., Green, M. J., & Macintyre, S. (2013). Does perceived physical attractiveness in adolescence predict better socioeconomic position in adulthood? Evidence from 20 years of follow up in a population cohort study. PLoS One, 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0063975Google Scholar
Bettencourt, B., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422–447. doi:10.1037/0033- 2909.119.3.422CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjorklund, D. F., & Shackelford, T. K. (1999). Differences in parental investment contribute to important differences between men and women. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 86–89. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00020Google Scholar
Björkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177–188. doi:10.1007/BF01420988Google Scholar
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992a). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<117::AID- AB2480180205>3.0.CO;2-3Google Scholar
Björkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992b). The development of direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-1025908.50010-6Google Scholar
Bleske, A. L., & Shackelford, T. K., (2001). Poaching, promiscuity, and deceit: Combatting mating rivalry in same‐sex friendships. Personal Relationships, 8, 407–424. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00048.xGoogle Scholar
Boyatzis, C. J., Baloff, P., & Durieux, C. (1998). Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic success on early adolescent peer popularity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 337–344. doi:10.1080/00221329809596155Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.54.4.616Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14. doi:10.1017/S0140525 X00023992Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1996). Paternity uncertainty and the complex repertoire of human mating strategies. American Psychologist, 51, 161–162. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.161Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 395–422. doi:10.1177/0265407590073006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Human aggression in evolutionary psychological perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 605–619. doi:10.1016/S0272 7358(97)00037-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146. doi:10.1177/147470490800600116Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Choe, J., Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2000). Distress about mating rivals. Personal Relationships, 7, 235–243. doi:10.1111/j.1475- 6811.2000.tb00014.xGoogle Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 37–48. doi:10.1556/JEP.7.2009.1.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Solano, A. C., Zurriaga, R., & González, P. (2011). Gender differences in the jealousy-evoking effect of rival characteristics: A study in Spain and Argentina. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 323–339. doi:10.1177/0022022111403664Google Scholar
Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Kenrick, D. T., & Warntjes, A. (2001). Age preferences for mates as related to gender, own age, and involvement level. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 241–250. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00065-4Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1995). A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 99–123. doi:10.1016/0162- 3095(94)00072-FGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture and intra-female aggression. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 22, 203–252. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001818Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 16–26. doi:10.1080/0022449040 9552210Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2013). The evolutionary psychology of women’s aggression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 368(1631). doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0078CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A., Muncer, S., & Bibel, D. (2001). Women and crime: An evolutionary approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 481–497. doi:10.1016 /S1359–1789(00)00019-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone-Lopez, K., Esbensen, F. A., & Brick, B. T. (2010). Correlates and consequences of peer victimization: Gender differences in direct and indirect forms of bullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 332–350. doi:10.1177/1541204010362954Google Scholar
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustments. Child Development, 5, 1185–1229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.xGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1988). Reproductive success. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (Ed.), Reproductive success: Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems (pp. 472–485). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Review lecture: Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 236, 339–372. doi:10.1098/rspb.1989.0027Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2009). Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour, 77, 3–11. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.026Google Scholar
Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). How sexually dimorphic are human mate preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1082–1093. doi:10.1177/0146167215590987CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Côté, S. M., Vaillancourt, T., Barker, E. D., Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). The joint development of physical and indirect aggression: Predictors of continuity and change during childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 37–55. doi:10.1017/S0954579407070034Google Scholar
Côté, S., Vaillancourt, T., LeBlanc, J. C., Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. E. (2006). The development of physical aggression from toddlerhood to pre-adolescence: A nation wide longitudinal study of Canadian children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 68–82. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-9001-zGoogle Scholar
Coyne, S. M., Manning, J. T., Ringer, L., & Bailey, L. (2007). Directional asymmetry (right–left differences) in digit ratio (2D: 4D) predict indirect aggression in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 865–872. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.010Google Scholar
Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317– 2327. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01859.xGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R., Bigbee, M. A., & Howes, C. (1996). Gender differences in children’s normative beliefs about aggression: How do I hurt thee? Let me count the ways. Child Development, 67, 1003–1014. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01779.xGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.xGoogle Scholar
Cross, C. P., Copping, L. T., & Campbell, A. (2011). Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 97-130. doi:10.1037/a0021591CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1990). Killing the competition. Human Nature, 1, 81–107. doi:10.1007/BF02692147Google Scholar
Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A., Volk, A. A., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Physical and relational bullying and victimization: Differential relations with adolescent dating and sexual behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 43, 111–122. doi:10.1002/ab.21667Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. New York: Bantam Dell.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Davis, A. C., Dufort, C., Desrochers, J., Vaillancourt, T., & Arnocky, S. (2018a). Gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy: Sex differences in gossip frequency, content, and attitudes. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 141–153. doi:10.1007/s40806-017- 0124-6.Google Scholar
Davis, A. C., Vaillancourt, T., & Arnocky, S. (2018b). Sex differences in initiating gossip. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–8). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999- 6_190–1Google Scholar
Davis, A. C., Vaillancourt, T., Arnocky, S., & Doyel, R. (2019). Women’s gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy: An evolutionary approach to gender and discrimination. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gossip and reputation (pp. 303–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Draper, P., & Harpending, H. (1988). A sociobiological perspective on the development of human reproductive strategies. In MacDonald, K. B. (Ed.), Sociobiological perspectives on human development (pp. 340–372). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Dunson, D. B., Colombo, B., & Baird, D. D. (2002). Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Human Reproduction, 17, 1399–1403. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.5.1399Google Scholar
Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in women’s choice of dress across the ovulatory cycle: Naturalistic and laboratory task-based evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1451–1460. doi:10.1177/0146167208323103Google Scholar
Eisner, M. (2003). Long-term historical trends in violent crime. Crime and Justice, 30, 83–142. doi:10.1086/652229Google Scholar
Ember, C. R. (1981). A cross-cultural perspective on sex-differences. In Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., & Whiting, B. B. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 531–580). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138–141. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.015Google Scholar
Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 271, 283–285. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160Google Scholar
Fisher, M. L. (2015). Women’s competition for mates: Experimental findings leading to ethological studies. Human Ethology Bulletin, 30, 52–69.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. L., & Cox, A. (2009). The influence of female attractiveness on competitor derogation. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 141–155. doi:10.1556 /JEP.7.2009.2.3Google Scholar
Fisher, M. L., & Cox, A. (2011). Four strategies used during intrasexual competition for mates. Personal Relationships, 18, 20–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01307.xGoogle Scholar
Fisher, M. L., & Moule, K. R. (2013). A new direction for intrasexual competition research: Cooperative versus competitive motherhood. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7, 318–325. doi:10.1037/h0099187Google Scholar
Galen, B. R., & Underwood, M. K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 589–600. doi:10.1037/0012- 1649.33.4.589Google Scholar
Gallup, A. C., O’Brien, D. T., & Wilson, D. S. (2011). Intrasexual peer aggression and dating behavior during adolescence: An evolutionary perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 258–267. doi:10.1002/ab.20384Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(2), 89–96. Doi:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009- 7Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55–77. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55Google Scholar
Gettler, L. T. (2010). Direct male care and hominin evolution: Why male–child interaction is more than a nice social idea. American Anthropologist, 112, 7–21. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01193.xGoogle Scholar
Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2009). Control tactics and partner violence in heterosexual relationships. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 445–452. doi:10.1016/ j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.007Google Scholar
Grebe, N. M., Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Thornhill, R. (2013). Women’s luteal-phase sexual proceptivity and the functions of extended sexuality. Psychological Science, 24, 2106–2110. doi:10.1177/0956797613485965Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., Perea, E. F., Shapiro, J. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 980–994. doi:10.1037/a0013907Google Scholar
Gustafsson, A., & Lindenfors, P. (2004). Human size evolution: No evolutionary allometric relationship between male and female stature. Journal of Human Evolution, 47, 253–266. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.07.004Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Gildersleeve, K. (2011). Can men detect ovulation? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 87–92. doi:10.1177/0963721411402668Google Scholar
Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006). Sex differences in indirect aggression: Psychological evidence from young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 231–245. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.001Google Scholar
Hill, K. R., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. Hawthorn, NY: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature: Natural selection and the female of the species. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2013). The “one animal in all creation about which man knows the least.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 368: 20130072. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0072CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutzell, K. L., & Payne, A. A. (2012). The impact of bullying victimization on school avoidance. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10, 370–385. doi:10.1177/1541204012438926Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (1986). Gender differences in aggression. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 51–66). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jokela, M. (2009). Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20th century United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 342–350. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.006Google Scholar
Jones, A. G., Rosenqvist, G., Berglund, A., Arnold, S. J., & Avise, J. C. (2000). The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 267, 677–680. doi:10.1098 /rspb.2000.1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–91. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X00067595Google Scholar
Klomek, A. B., Marrocco, F., Kleinman, M., Schonfeld, I. S., & Gould, M. S. (2007). Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 40–49. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000242237.84925.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerspetz, K. M., Björkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11‐ to 12‐year‐old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 403–414. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1988)14:6<403::AID-AB248 0140602>3.0.CO;2-DGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. (1994). Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. Theoretical Population Biology, 45, 1–15. doi:10.1006/tpbi.1994.1001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lansford, J. E., Skinner, A. T., Sorbring, E., Giunta, L. D., Deater‐Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., … & Uribe Tirado, L. M. (2012). Boys’ and girls’ relational and physical aggression in nine countries. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 298–308. doi:10.1002/ab.21433Google Scholar
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2009). Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: Relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 322–328. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.04.002Google Scholar
Ledwell, M., & King, V. (2015). Bullying and internalizing problems: Gender differences and the buffering role of parental communication. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 543–566. doi:10.1177/0192513X13491410Google Scholar
Lee, K. S., Brittain, H., & Vaillancourt, T. (2018). Predicting dating behavior from aggression and self‐perceived social status in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 44, 372–381. doi:10.1002/ab.21758Google Scholar
Lee, K. S., Guy, A., Dale, J., & Wolke, D. (2017). Adolescent desire for cosmetic surgery: Associations with bullying and psychological functioning. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 139, 1109–1118. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003252Google Scholar
Leenaars, L. S., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2008 ). Evolutionary perspective on indirect victimization in adolescence: The role of attractiveness, dating and sexual behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 404–415. doi:10.1002/ab.20252Google Scholar
Lease, A. M., Kennedy, C. A., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87–109. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00188Google Scholar
Lucas, M., & Koff, E. (2013). How conception risk affects competition and cooperation with attractive women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 16–22. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massar, K., Buunk, A., & Rempt, S. (2012). Age differences in women’s tendency to gossip are mediated by their mate value. Personality Individual Differences, 52, 106–109. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAndrew, F. T. (2014). The “sword of a woman”: Gossip and female aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 196–199. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.006Google Scholar
McDougall, P., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence: Pathways to adjustment and maladjustment. American Psychologist, 70, 300–310. doi:10.1037/a0039174Google Scholar
Miller, J. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hanna, S. E. (2009). The measurement of “eating-disorder-thoughts” and “eating-disorder-behaviors”: Implications for assessment and detection of eating disorders in epidemiological studies. Eating Behaviors, 10, 89–96. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.02.002Google Scholar
Morales-Vives, F., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2010). Are there sex differences in physical aggression in the elderly? Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 659–662. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.034Google Scholar
Muscarella, F., & Cunningham, M. R. (1996). The evolutionary significance and social perception of male pattern baldness and facial hair. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 99–117. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(95)00130-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nivette, A., Sutherland, A., Eisner, M., & Murray, J. (2019). Sex differences in adolescent physical aggression: Evidence from sixty‐three low‐ and middle‐income countries. Aggressive Behavior, 45, 82–92. doi:10.1002/ab.21799Google Scholar
Österman, K., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., Kaukiainen, A., Landau, S. F., Fraczek, A., & Caprara, G. V. (1998). Cross-cultural evidence of female indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 1–8. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1998)24:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-RGoogle Scholar
Owens, L., Shute, R., & Slee, P. (2000). “Guess what I just heard!”: Indirect aggression among teenage girls in Australia. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 67–83. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098- 2337(2000)26:1<67::AID-AB6>3.0.CO;2-CGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280. doi:10.1348/026151002166442Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2003). A sexual selection theory longitudinal analysis of sexual segregation and integration in early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 257–278. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00060-2Google Scholar
Piccoli, V., Foroni, F., & Carnaghi, A. (2013). Comparing group dehumanization and intrasexual competition among normally ovulating women and hormonal contraceptive users. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1600–1609. doi:10.1177/ 0146167213499025Google Scholar
Pisanski, K., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in mate preferences for averageness, symmetry, body size, and masculinity. Cross-Cultural Research, 47, 162–197. doi:10.1177/1069397112471806Google Scholar
Plavcan, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997). Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 103, 37–68. do:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199705)103:1<37::AID-AJPA4>3.0.CO;2-AGoogle Scholar
Provenzano, D. A., Dane, A. V., Farrell, A. H., Marini, Z. A., & Volk, A. A. (2018). Do bullies have more sex? The role of personality. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4(3), 221–232. doi:10.1007/s40806-017-0126-4Google Scholar
Ralls, K. (1977). Sexual dimorphism in mammals: Avian models and unanswered questions. American Naturalist, 111(981), 917–938. doi:10.1086/283223Google Scholar
Reynolds, T., Baumeister, R. F., & Maner, J. K. (2018). Competitive reputation manipulation: Women strategically transmit social information about romantic rivals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 195–209. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.011Google Scholar
Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 186–201. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.014Google Scholar
Rohner, R. P. (1976). Sex differences in aggression. Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology, 4, 57–72. doi:10.1525/eth.1976.4.1.02a00030Google Scholar
Rose, A., Swenson, L., & Waller, E. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relationships. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378–387. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378Google Scholar
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2011). Stability of peer victimization in early adolescence: Effects of timing and duration. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 443–464. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.005Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1185–1204. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1185Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894– 917. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.894Google Scholar
Sear, R., Steele, F., McGregor, I. A., & Mace, R. (2002). The effects of kin on child mortality in rural Gambia. Demography, 39(1), 43–63. doi:10.1353/dem.20020010Google Scholar
Sell, A., Bryant, G. A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C, … Gurven, M. (2010). Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 3509-3518. doi:10.1098/ rspb.2010.0769Google Scholar
Sentse, M., Dijkstra, J. K., Salmivalli, C., & Cillessen, A. H. (2013). The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence: A longitudinal social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 229–238. doi:10.1002/ab.21469Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Guta, F. E., & Schmitt, D. P. (2006). Mate guarding and frequent in-pair copulation in humans. Human Nature, 17, 239–252. doi:10.1007/s12110-006-1007-xGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1999). Facial attractiveness and physical health. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 71–76. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00036-1Google Scholar
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.65.2.293Google Scholar
Souza, A. L., Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Mate preferences in Brazil: Evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 45–49. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.053Google Scholar
Sunderani, S., Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Individual differences in mate poaching: An examination of hormonal, dispositional, and behavioral mate-value traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 533–542. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9974-yGoogle Scholar
Toscano, H., Schubert, T. W., & Sell, A. N. (2014). Judgments of dominance from the face track physical strength. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 1–18. doi:10.1177/147470491401200101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 1871–1971). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Underwood, M. K., Beron, K. J., & Rosen, L. H. (2009). Continuity and change in social and physical aggression from middle childhood through early adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 357–375. doi:10.1002/ab.20313Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Global study on homicide 2013: Trends, contexts, data. www.unodc.org/documents/gsh/pdfs/2014_GLOBAL_HOMICIDE_BOOK_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, T. (2005). Indirect aggression among humans: Social construct or evolutionary adaptation? In Tremblay, R. E., Hartup, W. W., and Archer, J. (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 158–177). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 368(1631). doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0080Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer‐valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396–408. doi:10.1002/ab.20138Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., & Krems, J. A. (2018). An evolutionary psychological perspective of indirect aggression in girls and women. In Coyne, S. & Ostrov, J. (Eds.), The development of relational aggression (pp. 111–126). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/ 9780190491826.003.0008Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., Miller, J. L., Fabgemi, J., Cȏté, S., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). Trajectories and predictors of indirect aggression: Results from a nationally representative longitudinal study of Canadian children aged 2–10. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 314–326. doi:10.1002/ab.20202Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., Miller, J. L., & Sharma, A. (2010). “Tripping the prom queen”: Female intrasexual competition and indirect aggression. In Österman, K. (Ed.), Indirect and direct aggression (pp. 17–31). Oxford: Oxford PressGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 569–577. doi:10.1002/ab.20413Google Scholar
Voland, E. (1998). Evolutionary ecology of human reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 347–374. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.347Google Scholar
Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Adolescent bullying, dating, and mating: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 1–11. doi:10.1177/1474704915613909Google Scholar
Vukovic, J., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Welling, L. L. (2009). Circum-menopausal effects on women’s judgements of facial attractiveness. Biology Letters, 5, 62–64. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0478Google Scholar
Walters, S., & Crawford, C. B. (1994). The importance of mate attraction for intrasexual competition in men and women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 5–30. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(94)90025-6Google Scholar
Weisner, T. S., & Gallimore, R. (1977). My brother’s keeper: Child and sibling caretaking. Current Anthropology, 18, 169–190. doi:10.1086/201883Google Scholar
White, D. D., Gallup, A. C., & Gallup, G. G. (2010). Indirect peer aggression in adolescence and reproductive behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 49–65. doi:10.1177/ 147470491000800106Google Scholar
Whiting, B., & Edwards, C. P. (1973). A cross-cultural analysis of sex differences in the behavior of children aged three through 11. Journal of Social Psychology, 91, 171–188. doi:10.1080/00224545.1973.9923040Google Scholar
Wyckoff, J. P., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M (2019). Gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy: Predicting information sharing from potential mate versus competitor mating strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 96–104. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.08.006Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Geiger, T. C., & Crick, N. R. (2005). Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behavior, and peer relations gender moderation and bidirectional associations. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 421–452. doi:10.1177/ 0272431605279841Google Scholar