Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T21:05:37.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2019

By
Jeremy Burman
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg  and
Wade E. Pickren
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Wade E. Pickren
Affiliation:
Ithaca College, New York
Get access

Summary

The challenge of writing an intellectual history of development is that – in the twentieth century, which is to say the period during which Modern Psychology underwent its major growth spurt (esp. after World War II, when B. Fred Skinner (1904–1990) and Jean Piaget (1896–1980 dominated)1 – development, generally, played second-fiddle to evolution. The result is that the developmental discourse has lately been primarily an evolutionary one: discussions of natural change in humans have been tilted toward the maturation and shaping of inherited traits, rather than the construction of novelties constrained by interactions between biology and context.2 In other words, recent psychological thinking about development has been informed by the manufactured dichotomy of nature versus nurture when instead we might have been thinking in terms of nature and nurture.3

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Intellectual History of Psychology , pp. 287 - 317
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amundson, R. (2005). The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apostel, L. (1987). Evolutionary epistemology, genetic epistemology, history and neurology. [Commentary on papers by Lamontagne, Gillièron, & Miller]. Evolutionary Epistemology, 190, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3967-7_15.Google Scholar
Baker, D. B. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology: Global Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1895). Mental Development in the Child and the Race. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1896a). A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist, 30, 441–451.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1896b). A new factor in evolution (continued). American Naturalist, 30, 536–553.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1902). Development and Evolution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1909). Darwin and the Humanities. Baltimore, MD: Psychological Review Publications.Google Scholar
Ball, R. S. (1977). The Gesell developmental schedules: Arnold Gesell (1880–1961). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00913694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateson, P., & Logan, C. (2007). Gilbert Gottlieb (1929–2006). [Invited address]. Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 446–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20217.Google Scholar
Beilin, H. (1992a). Piaget’s enduring contribution to developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.28.2.191.Google Scholar
Beilin, H. (1992b). Piaget’s new theory. In Beilin, H. & Pufall, P. B. (Eds.), Piaget’s Theory: Prospects and Possibilities (pp. 1–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L. (1975). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist, 30, 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.30.11.1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L. (1977). Wilhelm Wundt and early American psychology: A clash of two cultures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 291, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb53055.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boom, J. (2004). Individualism and collectivism: A dynamic systems interpretation of Piaget’s interactionism. In Carpendale, J. & Müller, U. (Eds.), Social Interaction and the Development of Knowledge (pp. 67–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrencce Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Boom, J. (2009). Piaget on equilibration. In Müller, U., Carpendale, J. I. M., & Smith, L. (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Piaget (pp. 132–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1929). A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Century.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1950). A History of Experimental Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Bringuier, J.-C. (Ed.). (1980). Conversations with Jean Piaget. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original collected works published 1977).Google Scholar
Brock, A. C. (2017). The new history of psychology: Some (different) answers to Lovett’s five questions. History of Psychology, 20, 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000036.Google Scholar
Broughton, J. M. (1981). The genetic psychology of James Mark Baldwin. American Psychologist, 36, 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.396.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (1999). The Darwin Wars: The Scientific Battle for the Soul of Man. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Burman, J. T. (2007). Piaget no “remedy” for Kuhn, but the two should be read together: Comment on Tsou’s “Piaget vs. Kuhn on scientific progress.” Theory & Psychology, 17, 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307079306.Google Scholar
Burman, J. T. (2013). Updating the Baldwin effect: The biological levels behind Piaget’s new theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 31, 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2012.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burman, J. T. (2015). Neglect of the foreign invisible: Historiography and the navigation of conflicting sensibilities. History of Psychology, 18, 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burman, J. T. (2016). Jean Piaget’s neo-Gödelian turn: Between biology and logic, origins of the New Theory. Theory & Psychology, 26, 751–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316672595.Google Scholar
Burman, J. T. (2017). Philosophical histories can be contextual without being sociological: Comment on Araujo’s historiography. Theory & Psychology, 27, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316682862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burman, J. T., Guida, A., & Nicolas, S. (2015). Hearing the inaudible experimental subject: Echoes of Inaudi, Binet’s calculating prodigy. History of Psychology, 18, 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahan, E. D. (1984). The genetic psychologies of James Mark Baldwin and Jean Piaget. Developmental Psychology, 20, 128–135.Google Scholar
Cairns, R. B. (1992). The making of a developmental science: The contributions and intellectual heritage of James Mark Baldwin. Developmental Psychology, 28, 17–24.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. L. (2001). Reflecting abstraction in context. In Piaget, J., Studies in Reflecting Abstraction (pp. 1–27). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. L. (2009). Constructive processes: Abstraction, generalization, and dialectics. In Müller, U., Carpendale, J. I. M., & Smith, L. (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Piaget (pp. 150–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. L. (in press). What Piaget brought (and failed to bring) to Royaumont. [Special issue on “Piaget 40 years later,” edited by S. Campanella]. Paradigmi, 36(3).Google Scholar
Capshew, J. C. (1999). Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Capshew, J. C. (2014). History of Psychology since 1945: A North American review. In Backhouse, R. E. & Fontaine, P. (Eds.), A Historiography of the Modern Social Sciences (pp. 144–182). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. B. (2005). Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Carson, J. (2007). The Measure of Merit: Talents, Intelligence, and Inequality in the French and American Republics, 1750–1940. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, J. (2014). Mental testing in the early twentieth century: Internationalizing the mental testing story. History of Psychology, 17, 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037475.Google Scholar
Cellérier, G., Papert, S., & Voyat, G. (1968). Cybernétique et épistémologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cravens, H., & Burnham, J. C. (1971). Psychology and evolutionary naturalism in American thought, 1890–1940. American Quarterly, 23, 635–657.Google Scholar
Crispo, E. (2007). The Baldwin effect and genetic assimilation: Revisiting two mechanisms of evolutionary change mediated by phenotypic plasticity. Evolution, 61, 2469–2479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00203.x.Google Scholar
Dalton, T. C. (2005). Arnold Gesell and the maturation controversy. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 40, 182–204. (Original work published 2001) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915215.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found Its Language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (2006). Universalism and indigenization in the history of modern psychology. In Brock, A. (Ed.), Internationalizing the History of Psychology (pp. 208–225). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. M. (1988). Piaget’s category-theoretic interpretation of cognitive development: A neglected contribution. Human Development, 31, 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1159/000275811.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (2003). Multilevel selection in a complex adaptive system: The problem of language origins. In Weber, B. H. & Depew, D. J. (Eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered (pp. 81–106). Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (2005). Beyond Piaget’s phenocopy: The baby in the Lamarckian bath. In Parker, S. T., Langer, J., & Milbrath, C. (Eds.), Biology and Knowledge Revisited: From Neurogenesis to Psychogenesis (pp. 87–122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Drack, M., Apfalter, W., & Pouvreau, D. (2007). On the making of a system theory of life: Paul A. Weiss and Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s conceptual connection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 349–373.Google Scholar
Evans, R. I. (1973). Jean Piaget: The Man and His Ideas. Translated by Duckworth, E.. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Furumoto, L. (1989). The new history of psychology. In Cohen, I. S. (Ed.), The G. Stanley Hall Lecture Series (Vol. 9, pp. 9–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. M. (1977). Piaget’s concept of equilibration: Biological, logical, and cybernetic roots. In Appel, M. H. & Goldberg, L. S. (Eds.), Equilibration: Theory, Research, and Application (pp. 21–32). New York: Plenum. (Original work published 1972).Google Scholar
Garcia, R. (1999). A systemic interpretation of Piaget’s theory of knowledge. In Scholnick, E. K., Nelson, K., Gelman, S. A., & Miller, P. H. (Eds.), Conceptual Development: Piaget’s Legacy (pp. 165–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Garcia, R. (2000). El conocimiento en construccion: De las formulaciones de Jean Piaget a la teoria de sistemas complejos. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (1991). Experiential canalization of behavioral development: Theory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.4.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (1992). Individual Development and Evolution: The Genesis of Novel Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (1999). Probabilistic Epigenesis and Evolution. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (2007). Probabilistic epigenesis. Developmental Science, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00556.x.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1991). Exaptation: A crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 47(3), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–4560.1991.tb01822.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 205, 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation: A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. D. (2015). Hall’s developmental theory and Haeckel’s recapitulationism. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1074069.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1946). The interaction of nature and nurture. Annals of Eugenics, 13, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1946.tb02358.x.Google Scholar
Harris, B. (1997). Repoliticizing the history of psychology. In Fox, D. & Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.), Critical Psychology: An Introduction (pp. 21–33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Herman, E. (1995). The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, G. E., & Nowlan, S. J. (1987). How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems, 1, 495–502.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, R. (1944). Social Darwinism in American Thought. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1994). Regulatory constructivism: On the relation between evolutionary epistemology and Piaget’s genetic epistemology. Biology and Philosophy, 9, 197–244.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution, the Modern Synthesis. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2014). Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press. (Original work published 2005).Google Scholar
Jamniczky, H. A., Boughner, J. C., Rolian, C., Gonzalez, P. N., Powell, C. D., Schmidt, E. J., Parsons, T. E., Bookstein, F. L., & Hallgrímsson, B. (2010). Rediscovering Waddington in the post‐genomic age. BioEssays, 32, 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200900189.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. D. (1995). The influence of Weismann’s germ-plasm theory on the distinction between learned and innate behavior. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 31, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(199504)31:2<115::AID-JHBS2300310202>3.0.CO;2-K.Google Scholar
Kelly, B. N. (1981). Inventing psychology’s past: E. G. Boring’s historiography in relation to the psychology of his time. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 2, 229–241.Google Scholar
Kesselring, T. (1994). A comparison between evolutionary and genetic epistemology or: Jean Piaget’s contribution to a post-Darwinian epistemology. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 25, 293–325.Google Scholar
Kitchener, R. F. (1985). Genetic epistemology, history of science and genetic psychology. Synthese, 65, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koops, W. (2015). No developmental psychology without recapitulation theory. [Special section: Developmental psychology and recapitulation theory]. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1078234.Google Scholar
Laubichler, M., & Hall, B. K. (2008). Conrad Hal Waddington: Forefather of Theoretical EvoDevo. Biological Theory, 3, 185–187. https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.3.185.Google Scholar
Laubichler, M., & Maeinschein, J. (Eds.). (2007). From Embryology to Evo-Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahey, T. H. (1981). The mistaken mirror: On Wundt’s and Titchener’s psychologies. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 17, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198104)17:2<273::AID-JHBS2300170216>3.0.CO;2-G.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A., & Gould, S. J. (2017). Exaptation revisited: Changes imposed by evolutionary psychologists and behavioral biologists. Biological Theory, 12, 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-016-0258-y.Google Scholar
Maienschein, J. (2005). Epigenesis and preformationism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/epigenesis/.Google Scholar
Maeinschein, J., Laubichler, M., & Loettgers, A. (2008). How can history of science matter to scientists? Isis, 99, 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcum, J. A. (2015). The evolving notion and role of Kuhn’s incommensurability thesis. In Devlin, W. J. & Bokulich, A. (Eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions – 50 years on (pp. 115–134). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
Messerly, J. G. (1996). Piaget’s Conception of Evolution: Beyond Darwin and Lamarck. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Messerly, J. G. (2009). Piaget’s biology. In Müller, U., Carpendale, J. I. M. & Smith, L. (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Piaget (pp. 94–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moessinger, P. (1978). Piaget on equilibration. Human Development, 21, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271589.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2000). A causal interpretation of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development: Reflections on the relationship between epigenesis and nonlinear dynamics. New Ideas in Psychology, 18, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00036-7.Google Scholar
Moore, D. S. (2015). The Developing Genome: An Introduction to Behavioral Epigenetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. M. (1979). The crisis of experimentalism in the 1920s: E. G. Boring and his uses of history. American Psychologist, 34, 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.4.289.Google Scholar
Oesterdiekhoff, G. W. (2012). Was pre-modern man a child? The quintessence of the psychometric and developmental approaches. Intelligence, 40, 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.05.005.Google Scholar
Oesterdiekhoff, G. W. (2013). Relevance of Piagetian cross-cultural psychology to the Humanities and Social Sciences. American Journal of Psychology, 126, 477–492. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.4.0477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oesterdiekhoff, G. W. (2016). Is a forgotten subject central to the future development of sciences? Jean Piaget on the interrelationship between ontogeny and history. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.098.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1981). What does the phenocopy copy? Psychological Reports, 48, 571–581.Google Scholar
Peterson, E. L. (2016). The Life Organic: The Theoretical Biology Club and the Roots of Epigenetics. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittburgh Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1914). Bergson et Sabatier. Revue chrétienne, 61, 192–200.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1925). Psychologie et critique de la connaissance. Archives de Psychologie, 19, 193–210.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1929). L’adaptation de la Limnaea stagnalis aux milieux lacustres de la Suisse romande: étude biométrique et génétique. Revue suisse de zoologie, 36, 263–531.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. Translated by Cook, M.. (2nd ed.). New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1936).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. Translated by Cook, M.. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1937).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, Dreams, and Imitation in Childhood. Translated by Gattegno, C. & Hodgson, F. M.. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1945).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1965). Note sur des Limnaea stagnalis L. var. lacustris Stud. élevées dans une mare du plateau vaudois. Revue suisse de zoologie, 72, 769–787.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1966). Observations sur le mode d’insertion et la chute des rameaux secondaires chez les Sedum: essai sur un cas d’anticipation morphogénétique explicable par des processus de transfert. Candollea (Genève), 21, 137–239.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (Ed.). (1967). Logique et connaissance scientifique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. Translated by Cellérier, G. & Langer, J.. In Mussen, P. H. (Ed.), Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley. (Original work published 1968).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1971a). Biology and Knowledge: An Essay on the Relations between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes. Translated by Walsh, B.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1967).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1971b). Insights and Illusions of Philosophy. Translated by Mays, W.. New York: World Publishing. (Original work published 1965).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1971c). Necessity and significance of comparative research in genetic psychology. Translated by Rosin, A.. In Psychology and Epistemology (pp. 45–62). New York: Viking. (Original work published 1966) [Retranslated as “Need and significance of cross-cultural studies in genetic psychology” in Piaget and His School].Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1971d). Structuralism. Translated by Maschler, C.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1968).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1972). The Principles of Genetic Epistemology. Translated by Mays, W.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1970).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1973). Main Trends in Inter-Disciplinary Research. New York: Harper Torchbooks. (Original work published 1970).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1979). Behaviour and Evolution. Translated by Nicholson-Smith, D.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1976).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1980). Adaptation and Intelligence: Organic Selection and Phenocopy. Translated by Eames, S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1974).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1982). Reflections on Baldwin [interview with J. J. Vonèche]. In Broughton, J. M. & Freeman-Moir, D. J. (Eds.), The Cognitive Developmental Psychology of James Mark Baldwin (pp. 80–86). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1985). The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures: The Central Problem of Intellectual Development. Translated by Brown, T. & Thampy, K. J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1993). Biology and war. Translated by Gruber, H. E. & Vonèche, J. J.. In Gruber, H. E. & Vonèche, J. J. (Eds.), The Essential Piaget (pp. 38–41). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1918).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in Reflecting Abstraction. Translated by Campbell, R. L.. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis. (Original work published 1977).Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1974). Understanding Causality. Translated by Miles, D. & Miles, M.. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1971).Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the History of Science. Translated by Feider, H.. New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1983).Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969a). The gaps in empiricism (Wedgwood, S., Trans.). In Koestler, A. & Smythies, S. R. (Eds.), Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences [The Alpbach Symposium 1968]. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969b). The Psychology of the Child. Translated by Weaver, H.. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1966).Google Scholar
Piatelli-Palmarini, M. (Ed.). (1980). Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original collected works published 1979).Google Scholar
Piatelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Ever since language and learning: Afterthoughts on the Piaget–Chomsky debate. Cognition, 50, 315–346.Google Scholar
Piatelli-Palmarini, M. (in press). Reflections on Piaget, Chomsky, Fodor, epigenetics and the Baldwin effect. [Special issue on “Piaget 40 years later,” ed. by S. Campanella]. Paradigmi, 36(3).Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (2010). The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pickren, W. E. (2007). Tension and opportunity in post-World War II American psychology. History of Psychology, 10, 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.10.3.279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickren, W. E. (2009). Indigenization and the history of psychology. Psychological Studies, 54, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-009-0012-7.Google Scholar
Preyer, W. T. (1889–1890). The Mind of the Child. Translated by Brown, H. W.. New York: Appleton. (Original work published 1882).Google Scholar
Ratcliff, M. J., & Burman, J. T. (2017). The mobile frontiers of Piaget’s psychology: From academic tourism to interdisciplinary collaboration / Las fronteras móviles de la psicología de Piaget. Del turismo académico a la colaboración interdisciplinaria. Spanish translation by Julia Fernández Treviño. Estudios de Psicología: Studies in Psychology, 38, 4–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2016.1268393.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. (1987). Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. (2008). The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roe, A., & Simpson, G. G. (1958). Place of behavior in the study of evolution. In Roe, A. & Simpson, G. G. (Eds.), Behavior and Evolution (pp. 337–339). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, A. (2015). Maintaining masculinity in mid-twentieth-century American psychology: Edwin Boring, scientific eminence, and the “woman problem.” Osiris, 30, 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/683022.Google Scholar
Sapp, J. (1987). Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sapp, J. (1990). The nine lives of Gregor Mendel. In Le Grand, H. E. (Ed.), Experimental Inquiries (pp. 137–166). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sapp, J. (2003). Genesis: The Evolution of Biology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selcer, P. (2009). The view from everywhere: Disciplining diversity in post-World War II international social science. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 45, 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20394.Google Scholar
Shenk, D. J. (2010). The Genius in All of Us. New York: Doubleday/Random House.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1953). The Baldwin effect. Evolution, 7, 110–117.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1958). Epilogue: Behavior and evolution. In Roe, A. & Simpson, G. G. (Eds.), Behavior and Evolution (pp. 507–535). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Slack, J. M. W. (2002). Conrad Hal Waddington: The last Renaissance biologist? Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 889–895. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg933.Google Scholar
Solovey, M. (2013). Shaky Foundations: The Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus in Cold War America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Solovey, M., & Cravens, H. (Eds.). (2012). Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan/St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2007). Dawkins vs Gould: Survival of the Fittest (2nd rev. ed.). Cambridge: Icon.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. Jr. (1962). Lamarckianism in American Social Science: 1890–1915. Journal of the History of Ideas, 23, 239–256.Google Scholar
Teo, T. (2013a). Agnotology in the dialectics of the history and philosophy of psychology. Theory & Psychology, 23, 840–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313504838.Google Scholar
Teo, T. (2013b). Backlash against American psychology: An indigenous reconstruction of the history of German critical psychology. History of Psychology, 16, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030286.Google Scholar
Urban, W. J. (2010). More than Science and Sputnik: The National Defense Education Act of 1958. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The Social Mind: Construction of the Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Strien, P. J. (1997). The American “colonization” of northwest European social psychology after World War II. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 33, 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199723)33:4<349::AID-JHBS1>3.0.CO;2-K.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, F. (1994). Piaget before Piaget. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vonèche, J. (1985). Genetic epistemology in the context of evolutionary epistemology. In Pitt, J. C. (Ed.), Change and Progress in Modern Science (pp. 199–232). Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1953). The “Baldwin effect,” “genetic assimilation” and “homeostasis.” Evolution, 7, 386–387.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1957). The Strategy of the Genes: A Discussion of Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1959a). Canalization of development and genetic assimilation of acquired characters. Nature, 183, 1654–1655. https://doi.org/10.1038/1831654a0.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1959b). Evolutionary systems: Animal and human. Nature, 183, 1634–1638. https://doi.org/10.1038/1831634a0.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1975). Genetic assimilation in Limnaea. In The Evolution of an Evolutionist (pp. 92–95). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1977). Tools for Thought. Frogmore, UK: Paladin.Google Scholar
Weber, B. H., & Depew, D. J. (Eds.). (2003). Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. In Sterelny, K. & Wilson, R. A. (Eds.), Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology, 5. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weismann, A. (1889). Essays upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems. Translated by Poulton, E. B., Schönland, S., & Shipley, A. E.. London: Clarendon/Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1881–1888).Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wozniak, R. H. (2005). Lost classics and forgotten contributors: James Mark Baldwin as a case study in the disappearance and rediscovery of ideas. In Dalton, T. C. & Evans, R. B. (Eds.), The Life Cycle of Psychological Ideas (pp. 33–58). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
Wozniak, R. H. (2009). James Mark Baldwin, professional disaster, and the European connection. Rassegna di Psicologia, 2, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.7379/70575.Google Scholar
Wozniak, R. H., & Santiago-Blay, J. A. (2013). Trouble at Tyson Alley: James Mark Baldwin’s arrest in a Baltimore bordello. History of Psychology, 16, 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033575.Google Scholar
Young, R. M. (1966). Scholarship and the history of the behavioural sciences. History of Science, 5, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327536600500101.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×