Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Surveying the Imagination Landscape
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives on the Imagination
- Part II Imagery-Based Forms of the Imagination
- 12 The Visual Imagination
- 13 Musical Imagery
- 14 Neurophysiological Foundations and Practical Applications of Motor Imagery
- 15 Temporal Mental Imagery
- 16 Emotional Mental Imagery
- 17 Multisensory Perception and Mental Imagery
- 18 Evocation: How Mental Imagery Spans Across the Senses
- Part III Intentionality-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part IV Novel Combinatorial Forms of the Imagination
- Part V Phenomenology-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part VI Altered States of the Imagination
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
18 - Evocation: How Mental Imagery Spans Across the Senses
from Part II - Imagery-Based Forms of the Imagination
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2020
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Surveying the Imagination Landscape
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives on the Imagination
- Part II Imagery-Based Forms of the Imagination
- 12 The Visual Imagination
- 13 Musical Imagery
- 14 Neurophysiological Foundations and Practical Applications of Motor Imagery
- 15 Temporal Mental Imagery
- 16 Emotional Mental Imagery
- 17 Multisensory Perception and Mental Imagery
- 18 Evocation: How Mental Imagery Spans Across the Senses
- Part III Intentionality-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part IV Novel Combinatorial Forms of the Imagination
- Part V Phenomenology-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part VI Altered States of the Imagination
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
Listening to Wagner’s “Ride of the Valkyries” may lead us to imagine a scene of an army charging ; seeing Margaret Thatcher on a silent TV screen may make us imagine the sound of her voice; seeing a feather moving on the surface of a hand might make us almost feel the stroke on our own hand. All these cases may be accounted for under the category of crossmodal imagery: the occurrence of a conscious mental image in a given sensory modality, caused by the presentation of an object in another modality. This chapter shows why crossmodal imagery should be distinguished from mere neural activation across the senses and internally generated imagery, and restricts its definition to cases in which the mental image in an unstimulated modality is caused by another sensory stimulus, and its contents constrained by this stimulus. This more precise category of crossmodal imagery challenges us to re-examine several accepted claims in the domain of imagination: The induction of mental imagery does not necessarily follow modal paths, daydreaming might not be internally but externally generated by what we hear or feel, and non-visual imagery, which is often considered less frequent, may prove easier to induce crossmodally through visual, rather than through nonvisual stimulus.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination , pp. 276 - 290Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abramson, M., and Goldinger, S. D. (1997). What the Reader’s Eye Tells the Mind’s Ear: Silent Reading Activates Inner Speech. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1059–1068.Google Scholar
Banissy, M. J., and Ward, J. (2007). Mirror-Touch Synesthesia Is Linked with Empathy. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 815–816.Google Scholar
Bensafi, M., and Rouby, C. (2007). Individual Differences in Odor Imaging Ability Reflected Differences in Olfactory and Emotional Perception. Chemical Senses, 32, 237–244.Google Scholar
Bernstein, L. E., Jiang, J., Pantazis, D., Lu, Z. L., and Joshi, A. (2011). Visual Phonetic Processing Localized Using Speech and Nonspeech Face Gestures in Video and Point-Light Displays. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 1660–1676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, L. E., and Liebenthal, E. (2014). Neural Pathways for Visual Speech Perception. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, N. (2011). Perceptual Consciousness Overflows Cognitive Access. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 567–575.Google Scholar
Budd, M. (2012). The Musical Expression of Emotion: Metaphorical-as versus Imaginative-as Perception. Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics, 49(2), 131–148.Google Scholar
Calvert, G. A., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., et al. (1997). Activation of Auditory Cortex during Silent Lipreading. Science, 276(5312), 593–596.Google Scholar
Cappe, C., Rouiller, E. M., and Barone, P. (2009). Multisensory Anatomical Pathways. Hearing Research, 258(1–2), 28–36.Google Scholar
Caron-Desrochers, L., Schönwiesner, M., Focke, K., and Lehmann, A. (2018). Assessing Visual Modulation along the Human Subcortical Auditory Pathway. Neuroscience Letters, 685, 12–17.Google Scholar
Deroy, O., Fernandez-Prieto, I., Navarra, J., and Spence, C. (2018). Unravelling the Paradox of Spatial Pitch. In Hubbard, T. L. (ed.), Spatial Biases in Perception and Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deroy, O., and Spence, C. (2016). Crossmodal Correspondences: Four Challenges. Multisensory Research, 29(1–3), 29–48.Google Scholar
De Vignemont, F. (2016). Mirror-Touch Synaesthesia. In Deroy, O (ed.), Sensory Blending: On Synaesthesia and Related Phenomena. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 275–292.Google Scholar
Fox, K. C., and Christoff, K. (eds.), (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Spontaneous Thought: Mind Wandering, Creativity, and Dreaming. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, A. R. (1992). Musical Aspects of Auditory Imagery. In Reisberg, D (ed.), Auditory Imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hertrich, I., Dietrich, S., and Ackermann, H. (2011). Cross-Modal Interactions during Perception of Audiovisual Speech and Nonspeech Signals: An fMRI Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 221–237.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. (2014). The Architecture of Speech Production and the Role of the Phoneme in Speech Processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1), 2–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubbard, T. L. (2010). Auditory Imagery: Empirical Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 302.Google Scholar
Keeley, B. L. (2002). Making Sense of the Senses: Individuating Modalities in Humans and Other Animals. The Journal of Philosophy, 99(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MacDougal, R. (1898). Music Imagery: A Confession of Experience. Psychological Review, 5(5), 463.Google Scholar
Parise, C. V. (2016). Crossmodal Correspondences: Standing Issues and Experimental Guidelines. Multisensory Research, 29(1–3), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacocke, C. (2009). Experiencing Metaphorically-as in Music Perception: Clarifications and Commitments. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(3), 299–306.Google Scholar
Pekkola, J., Ojanen, V., Autti, T., et al. (2005). Primary Auditory Cortex Activation by Visual Speech: An fMRI Study at 3 T. Neuroreport, 16(2), 125–128.Google Scholar
Riedel, P., Ragert, P., Schelinski, S., Kiebel, S. J., and von Kriegstein, K. (2015). Visual Face-Movement Sensitive Cortex Is Relevant for Auditory-only Speech Recognition. Cortex, 68, 86–99.Google Scholar
Royet, J. P., Koenig, O., Gregoire, M. C., et al. (1999). Functional Anatomy of Perceptual and Semantic Processing for Odors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(1), 94–109. PubMed PMID: 9950717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadaghiani, S., Maier, J. X., and Noppeney, U. (2009). Natural, Metaphoric, and Linguistic Auditory Direction Signals Have Distinct Influences on Visual Motion Processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(20), 6490–6499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwitzgebel, E. (2016). Phenomenal Consciousness, Defined and Defended as Innocently as I Can Manage. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(11–12), 224–235.Google Scholar
Serino, A., Pizzoferrato, F., and Ladavas, E. (2008). Viewing a Face (Especially One’s Own Face) Being Touched Enhances Tactile Perception on the Face. Psychological Science, 19(5), 434–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. (1978). The Mental Image. American Psychologist, 33(2), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N., and Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental Images and their Transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N., and Metzler, J. (1971). Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects. Science, 171, 701–703.Google Scholar
Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal Correspondences: A Tutorial Review. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73(4), 971–995.Google Scholar
Spence, C., and Deroy, O. (2013a). Crossmodal Mental Imagery. In Lacey, S and Lawson, R (eds.), Multisensory Imagery. New York, NY: Springer, 157–183.Google Scholar
Spence, C., and Deroy, O. (2013b). How Automatic are Crossmodal Correspondences? Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyll, S., Budinger, E., and Noesselt, T. (2011). Thalamic Influences on Multisensory Integration. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 4, 378–381.Google Scholar
van den Brink, R. L., Cohen, M. X., van der Burg, E., et al. (2013). Subcortical, Modality-Specific Pathways Contribute to Multisensory Processing in Humans. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 2169–2177.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by