Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- General Introduction
- Part I Historical Antecedents and Philosophical Debates
- Part II Methods, Measurement and Empirical Evidence
- Part III Issues in Public Policy
- Introduction to Part III
- 25 On Education and Capabilities Expansion
- 26 Capability Approach to Children’s Well-Being and Well-Becoming
- 27 Capability and Disability
- 28 Social Exclusion and Capability Development
- 29 Human Security
- 30 Income Inequality and Human Capabilities
- 31 The Capability Approach and Human Rights
- 32 Capabilities and the Law
- 33 Capabilities, Public Reason and Democratic Deliberation
- 34 Entitlements and Capabilities
- 35 Religion and the Capability Approach
- Index
- References
31 - The Capability Approach and Human Rights
from Part III - Issues in Public Policy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- General Introduction
- Part I Historical Antecedents and Philosophical Debates
- Part II Methods, Measurement and Empirical Evidence
- Part III Issues in Public Policy
- Introduction to Part III
- 25 On Education and Capabilities Expansion
- 26 Capability Approach to Children’s Well-Being and Well-Becoming
- 27 Capability and Disability
- 28 Social Exclusion and Capability Development
- 29 Human Security
- 30 Income Inequality and Human Capabilities
- 31 The Capability Approach and Human Rights
- 32 Capabilities and the Law
- 33 Capabilities, Public Reason and Democratic Deliberation
- 34 Entitlements and Capabilities
- 35 Religion and the Capability Approach
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter examines the connections between the capability approach and human rights. It considers the links between the capability approach and the international human rights framework and discusses the treatment of the relationship between capabilities and human rights within Sen’s research agenda, Nussbaum’s work and the broader literature on the capability approach. Interdisciplinary perspectives spanning law, ethics, public policy and political economy are addressed, and four distinct ‘entry-points’ for examining the connections between the capability approach and human rights are explored. The first focuses on the capability approach as an ‘informational space’ for human rights monitoring, assessment and evaluation. The second focuses on normative concerns and the importance of the capability concept for theoretical thinking about human rights. The third focuses on practical initiatives that explicitly combine the capability approach and human rights as a basis for specific applications and public policies. The fourth addresses the instrumental role that human rights recognitions play within processes of capability expansion (as elements of public action and as mechanisms of broader social change).
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach , pp. 624 - 642Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Balakrishnan, R., Heinz, J. and Elson, D. 2016. Rethinking Economic Policy for Social Justice: The Radical Potential for Human Rights. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T. and Burgess, R. 2002. ‘The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117/4: 1415–1452.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. and Vizard, P. 2011. ‘Operationalizing the Capability Approach as a Basis for Equality and Human Rights Monitoring in Twenty-First-Century Britain’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 12/1: 91–119.Google Scholar
Drèze, J. 2004. ‘Democracy and the Right to Food’. Economic and Political Weekly 39/17: 1723–1731.Google Scholar
Drèze, J. and Sen, A. K. 2002. India: Development and Participation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drèze, J. and Sen, A. K. 2013. An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
EHRC (Equality and Human Rights Commission). 2010. How Fair is Britain? Equality, Human Rights and Good Relations in 2010: The First Triennial Review. London: Equality and Human Rights Commission. Available at: www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/publication-download/how-fair-britain-report (accessed 24 February 2020).Google Scholar
EHRC (Equality and Human Rights Commission) 2015 Is Britain Fairer? The State of Equality and Human Rights 2015. London: Equality and Human Rights Commission. Available at: www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/is-britain-fairer-2015.pdf (accessed 24 February 2020).Google Scholar
2017. Measurement Framework for Equality and Human Rights. Available at: www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/measurement-framework-interactive.pdf (accessed 24 February 2020).Google Scholar
Fredman, S. 2008. Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S., Lawson-Remer, T. and Randolph, S. 2015. Fulfilling Economic and Social Rights. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. 2006. ‘From Individual to Collective Capabilities: The Capability Approach as a Conceptual Framework for Self‐Help’. Journal of Human Development 7/3: 397–416.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. 2017. ‘How to Build Collective Capabilities: The 3 C-Model for Grassroots-Led Development’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 18/2: 197–222.Google Scholar
Langford, M., Cousins, B., Dugard, J. and Madlingozi, T. 2014. Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1997. ‘Capabilities and Human Rights’. Fordham Law Review 66/2: 273–300.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2003. ‘Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice’. Feminist Economics 9/2–3: 33–59.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2004. ‘Beyond the Social Contract: Capabilities and Global Justice’. Oxford Development Studies 32/1: 3–18.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2007. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. ‘Capabilities, Entitlements, Rights: Supplementation and Critique’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 12/1: 23–37.Google Scholar
OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights). 2002. Human Rights and Poverty Reduction: A Conceptual Framework. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights) 2012. Human Rights Indicators: A Guide to Measurement and Implementation. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1986. Faces of Hunger: An Essay on Poverty, Justice and Development. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O 1996. Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osmani, S. 2000. ‘Human Rights to Food, Health, and Education’. Journal of Human Development 1/2: 273–298.Google Scholar
Osmani, S. 2005. ‘Poverty and Human Rights: Building on the Capability Approach’. Journal of Human Development 6/2: 205–219.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2016. ‘Capabilitarianism’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 17/3: 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1982b. ‘The Right Not To Be Hungry’, in Fløistad, G (ed.). Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff: vol. 2, 343–360.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1984. ‘Rights and Capabilities’, in Sen, A. K., Resources, Values and Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1985a. ‘Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984’. Journal of Philosophy 82/4: 169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1985b. ‘Rights as Goals’ (Austin Lecture), in Guest, S and Milne, A (eds.). Equality and Discrimination: Essays in Freedom and Justice. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner: 11–26.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2000. ‘Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason’. Journal of Philosophy 97/9: 477–502.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2004. ‘Elements of a Theory of Human Rights’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 32/4: 315–356.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2005. ‘Human Rights and Capabilities’. Journal of Human Development 6/2: 151–166.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2012. ‘Foreword’, in Elson, D, Fukuda-Parr, S and Vizard, P (eds.). Human Rights and the Capabilities Approach: An Inter-Disciplinary Dialogue. London: Routledge: xi–xviii.Google Scholar
Sengupta, A. 2004. ‘The Human Right to Development’. Oxford Development Studies 32/2: 179–203.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. 1999. ‘On Liberty, the Right to Know, and Public Discourse: The Role of Transparency in Public Life’. Oxford Amnesty Lecture. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. 2002. ‘Participation and Development: Perspectives from the Comprehensive Development Paradigm’. Review of Development Economics 6/2: 163–182.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J. 2007. ‘The Moral Reality of Human Rights’, in Pogge, T (ed.). Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor? Oxford University Press: 75–101.Google Scholar
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2000. Human Development Report 2000: Human Rights and Human Development. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNGA (United Nations General Assembly). 2013. ‘Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food’, A/68/288. United Nations General Assembly. Available at: www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20131025_rtf_en.pdf (accessed 24 February 2020).Google Scholar
van Hees, M. 2013. ‘Rights, Goals, and Capabilities’. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 12/3: 247–259.Google Scholar
Vizard, P. 2006a. Poverty and Human Rights: Sen’s ‘Capability Perspective’ Explored. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vizard, P. 2006b. ‘Pogge v. Sen on Global Poverty and Human Rights’. Ethics and Economics 3/2: 1–22.Google Scholar
Vizard, P. 2007. ‘Selecting and Justifying a Basic Capability Set: Should the International Human Rights Framework be Given a More Direct Role?’ Oxford Development Studies 35/3: 25–250.Google Scholar
Vizard, P. 2010. ‘Symposium on the Idea of Justice: Sen’s Treatment of Human Rights’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 11/4: 615–621.Google Scholar
Vizard, P. 2012. ‘Evaluating Compliance Using Quantitative Methods and Indicators: Lessons from the Human Rights Measurement Framework’. Nordic Journal of Human Rights Special Issue: Quantifying Human Rights 30/3: 240–278.Google Scholar
Vizard, P. 2013. ‘Towards a New Model of Public Services: The Capability Approach and Rights-Based Approaches’, in S. Griffiths, H. Kippin and G. Stoker (eds.). Public Services: A New Reform Agenda. London: Bloomsbury: 53–70.Google Scholar
Vizard, P. 2015. ‘The Human Rights and Equality Agenda in Social Disadvantage’, in Dean, H and Platt, L (eds.). Social Advantage and Disadvantage. Oxford University Press: 42–61.Google Scholar
Vizard, P. 2018. ‘Human Rights: Shaping Development Ethics, Pragmatics, Law, Policy and Politics’, in Drydyk, J and Keleher, L (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics. London: Routledge: 251–265.Google Scholar
Vizard, P., Elson, D. and Fukuda-Parr, S. 2012. ‘Introduction’, in Elson, D, Fukuda-Parr, S and Vizard, P (eds.). Human Rights and the Capabilities Approach: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. London: Routledge: 1–22.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1987. ‘The Standard of Living: Interests and Capabilities’, in Sen, A. The Standard of Living (ed. Hawthorn, G). Cambridge University Press: 94–102.Google Scholar