Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). TBLT: Building the road as we travel. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. and Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M., ed. Encyclopedia of language teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 597–603.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2015). Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M. (2018). TBLT as a researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Annenberg Learner. (n.d.). Teaching foreign languages K-12: A library if classroom practices. Retrieved from: https://www.learner.org/series/teaching-foreign-languages-k-12-a-library-of-classroom-practices/creating-travel-advice/view-analyze-video/.Google Scholar

Benevides, M. and Valvona, C. (2018). Widgets Inc: A task-based course in workplace English. 2nd ed. Tokyo: Atama-ii Books.Google Scholar

Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36–57.Google Scholar

Butler, Y. G. (2016). Communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. In Van Deusen-Scholl, N. and May, S., eds. Second and foreign language education, encyclopedia of language and education. 3rd ed. New York: Springer, pp. 327–38.Google Scholar

Bygate, M., Norris, J. M., and Van den Branden, K. (2015). Task-based language teaching. In Chapelle, C. A., ed. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Bygate, M. and Samuda, V. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595–608.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1968). Social processes and social simulation games. In Boocock, S. S. and Schild, E. O., eds. Simulation games in learning. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar

Crookes, G. (1986). Task classification: A cross disciplinary review (Technical Report No. 4). Honolulu: Center for Second Language Classroom Research, Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa.Google Scholar

Crookes, G. and Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41(4), 469–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2017). Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortune, A. E., Lee, M., and Cavazos, A. (2005). Achievement motivation and outcome in social work field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), 115–30.Google Scholar

Guthrie, J. T. and Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D. and Barr, R., eds. Reading research handbook. Vol. III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 403–24.Google Scholar

Hu, G. W. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15, 93–105.Google Scholar

Hu, G. W. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 635–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In Reigelruth, C. M., ed. Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 383–434.Google Scholar

Klein, J. D. and Freitag, E. (1991). Effects of using an instructional game on motivation and performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(5), 303–8.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liu, M., Toprac, P., and Yuen, T. T. (2009). What factors make a multimedia learning environment engaging: A case study. In Zheng, R. Z., ed. Cognitive effects of multimedia learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 173–92.Google Scholar

Long, K. J. (2004). Unit of analysis. In Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A., and Futing Liao, T., eds. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1157–58.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–78.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M., eds. Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bahtia, T. K., eds. Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Academic Press, pp. 413–68.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015a). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015b). TBLT: Building the road as we travel. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. and Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In Crookes, G. and Gass, S., eds. Tasks in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 9–54.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. and Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M., ed. Encyclopedia of language teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 597–603.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. and Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–27.Google Scholar

Luo, S. and Xing, J. (2015). Teachers’ perceived difficulty in implementing TBLT in China. In Thomas, M. and Reinders, H., eds. Contemporary Task-based language teaching in Asia: Contemporary studies in linguistics. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 139–55.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. and Doughty, C., eds. Handbook of language teaching. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 578–94.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2015). Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2018). Task-based language assessment: Aligning designs with intended uses and consequences. Japan Language Testing Association (JLTA) Journal, 21, 3–20.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. and Rogers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M. (2018). TBLT as a research pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sasayama, S. (2018). An evidence-based approach to L2 task design. Taking it to Task, 3(1), 3–15.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–58.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38–57.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. and Madden, C., eds. Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 235–53.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2006), ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Willis, D. and Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berwick, R. (1989). Needs assessment in language programming: From theory to practice. In Johnson, R. K., ed. The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–62.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 269–293.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). Identifying target tasks. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 117–68.Google Scholar

Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013). Needs analysis for task-based language teaching: A case study of Indigenous vocational education and training students who speak EAL/EAD. TESOL in Context, 22(2), 36–50.Google Scholar

Riestenberg, K. and Sherris, A. (2018). Task-based teaching of indigenous languages: Investment and methodological principles in Macuiltianguis Zapotec and Salish Qlispe revitalization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74(3), 434–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serafini, E. J., Lake, J., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar

Shehadeh, A. (2012). Introduction: Broadening the perspective of task-based language teaching scholarship: The contribution of research in foreign language contexts. In Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C. A., eds. Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Van Avermaet, P. and Gysen, S. (2006). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based approach. In Van den Branden, K., ed., Task-based language teaching in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–46.Google Scholar

Abbott, A. and Martínez, G. (2018). Spanish for the professions and community service learning: Applications with heritage learners. In Potowski, K., ed. The Routledge handbook of Spanish as a heritage language. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, R. and Newton, J. (2009). TBLT in Asia: Constraints and opportunities. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 1–17.Google Scholar

Adendorff, E. (2014). A task-based approach to improving the communicative skills of university students learning Afrikaans as an additional language. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 43, 1–16.Google Scholar

Bao, R. and Du, X. (2015). Implementation of task-based language teaching in Chinese as a foreign language: Benefits and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(3), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 723–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benesch, S. (1999). Rights analysis: studying power relations in an academic setting. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 313–27.Google Scholar

Berwick, R. (1989). Needs assessment in language programming: From theory to practice. In Johnson, R. K., ed. The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–62.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 269–93.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Brindley, G. (1984). Needs analysis and objective setting in the Adult Migrant Education Program. Sydney: Adult Migrant Education Service.Google Scholar

Bryfonski, L. and McKay, T. H. (2019). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(5), 603–32.Google Scholar

Bygate, M. (2016). Sources, developments and directions of task-based language teaching. Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 381–400.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595–608.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2012). TBLT in EFL settings: Looking back and moving forward. In Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C. A., eds. Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 345–58.Google Scholar

Chaudron, C., Doughty, C., Kim, Y., Kong, D., Lee, J., Lee, Y., Long, M. H., Rivers, R., and Urano, K. (2005). A task-based needs analysis of a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–24.Google Scholar

Crookes, G. (2009). Radical language teaching. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 595–609.Google Scholar

Cumaranatunge, L. K. (1988). An EOP case study: Domestic aids in West Asia. In Chamberlain, D., and Baumgardener, R. J., eds. ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation. ELT document 129. London: Modern English Publications/The British Council, pp. 127–33.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. with Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dudley-Evans, T. and St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In McHoul, A. and Rapley, M., eds. How to analyze talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 25–28.Google Scholar

Flores, N. and García, O. (2017). A critical review of bilingual education in the United States: From basements and pride to boutiques and profit. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 14–29.Google Scholar

Flowerdew, L. (2005). Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: The ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 135–47.Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1970/2005). The pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder/Continuum.Google Scholar

Gilabert, R. (2005). Evaluating the use of multiple sources and methods in needs analysis: A case study of journalists in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia (Spain). In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–99.Google Scholar

González-Lloret, M. and Nielson, K. B. (2015). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19, 525–49.Google Scholar

Hult, F. M. and Hornberger, N. H. (2016). Revisiting orientations in language planning: Problem, right, and resource as an analytical heuristic. Bilingual Review/Revista Bilingüe, 33, 30–49.Google Scholar

Hutchison, T., and Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Iizuka, T. (2019). Task-based needs analysis:Identifying communicative needs for study abroad students in Japan. System, 80, 134–42.Google Scholar

Jasso-Aguilar, R. (1999) Sources, methods and triangulation in needs analysis:A critical perspective in a case study of Waikiki hotel maids. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 27–46.Google Scholar

Jasso-Aguilar, R. (2005). Sources, methods and triangulation in needs analysis: A critical perspective in a case study of Waikiki hotel maids. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–58.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 157–81.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Konoeda, K. and Watanabe, Y. (2008). Task-based critical pedagogy in Japanese EFL classrooms: Rationale, principles, and examples. In Mantero, M., Miller, C. P. and Watzke, J. L., eds. Readings in language studies. Vol. 1. St. Louis: International Society for Language Studies.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis:Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 99–112.Google Scholar

Leeman, J., Rabin, L., and Román-Mendoza, E. (2011). Identity and activism in heritage language education. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 481–95.Google Scholar

Leeman, J. and Serafini, E. J. (2016). Sociolinguistics in heritage language education: Promoting critical translingual competence. In Beaudrie, S. and Fairclough, M., eds. Innovative approaches in heritage language pedagogy: From research to practice. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 56–79.Google Scholar

Leung, C., Harris, R., and Rampton, B. (2004). Living with inelegance in qualitative research on task-based learning. In Norton, B. and Toohey, K., eds. Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242–68.Google Scholar

Li, G. and Ni, X. (2013). Effects of a technology-enriched, task-based language teaching curriculum on Chinese elementary students’ achievement in English as a foreign language. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 33–49.Google Scholar

Liakina, N. and Michaud, G. (2018). Needs analysis for task-based curriculum design: How useful can it be for general purpose L2 courses? Nouvelle Revue Synergies Canada, 11.Google Scholar

Lin, T. and Wu, C. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching in English classrooms in Taiwanese junior high schools. TESOL Journal, 3, 586–609.Google Scholar

Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243–49.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M., eds. Modeling and assessing second language development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005a) Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005b). A rationale for needs analysis and needs analysis research. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005c). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2009). Methodological principles for language teaching. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 373–94.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2013). Needs analysis. In Chapelle, C. A., ed. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015a). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Long, M. K. and Uscinski, I. (2012). Evolution of languages for specific purposes programs in the United States: 1990–2011. Modern Language Journal, 96, 173–89.Google Scholar

Malicka, A., Gilabert, R., and Norris, J. M. (2019). From needs analysis to task design:Insights from an English for specific purposes context, 23(1), 78–106.Google Scholar

Martin, A. and Adrada-Rafael, S. (2017). Business Spanish in the real world: A task-based needs analysis. L2 Journal, 9(1), 39–61.Google Scholar

McKay, S. L. and Rubdy, R. (2009). The social and sociolinguistic contexts of language learning and teaching. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 10–25.Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. D. (2008). Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Spring, 50–65.Google Scholar

Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

National Service-Learning Clearinghouse. (2008). History of service-learning in higher education. New York: National Service-Learning Clearinghouse.Google Scholar

Norris, J. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C. J., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 578–94.Google Scholar

Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2012). Addressing the language and literacy needs of Aboriginal high school VET students who speak SAE as an additional language. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41(2), 1–11.Google Scholar

Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013a). A task-based needs analysis for Australian Aboriginal students: Going beyond the target situation to address cultural issues. International Journal of Training Research, 11(3), 246–59.Google Scholar

Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013b). Needs analysis for task-based language teaching: A case study of Indigenous vocational education and training students who speak EAL/EAD. TESOL in Context, 22(2), 36–50.Google Scholar

Park, M. (2012). Implementing computer-assisted task-based language teaching in the Korean secondary EFL context. In Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C. A., eds. Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 215–40.Google Scholar

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Phuong, H. Y., Van den Branden, K., Van Steendamn, E., and Sercu, L. (2015). The impact of PPP and TBLT on Vietnamese students’ writing performance and self-regulatory writing strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 116, 37–93.Google Scholar

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rabin, L. (2015). Service-learning/Aprendizaje-servicio as a global practice in Spanish. In LaCorte, M., ed. The Routledge handbook of Hispanic applied linguistics. New York: Routledge, pp. 168–83.Google Scholar

Richterich, R. and Chancerel, J.-L. (1987). Identifying the needs of adults learning a foreign language. Oxford: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Riestenberg, K. and Sherris, A. (2018). Task-based teaching of indigenous languages: Investment and methodological principles in Macuiltianguis Zapotec and Salish Qlispe revitalization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74(3), 434–59.Google Scholar

Ruíz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8, 15–34.Google Scholar

Samuda, V., Bygate, M., and Van den Branden, K. (2018). Introduction: Towards a researched pedagogy for TBLT. In Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M. eds. TBLT as a researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Sánchez-López, L. (2013). Spanish for specific purposes. In Chapelle, C. A. ed. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.Google Scholar

Serafini, E. J. (2021). Service learning in heritage language education: A critical overview of motivation, design, and outcomes. In Torres, J. R. and Pascual y Cabo, D., eds. El español como lengua de herencia (Advances in Spanish Language Teaching Series). London and New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar

Serafini, E. J., Lake, J., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar

Serafini, E. J. and Torres, J. (2015). The utility of needs analysis for non-domain expert teachers in designing task-based Spanish for the Professions curricula. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 447–72.Google Scholar

Shehadeh, A. (2012). Broadening the perspective of task-based language teaching scholarship: The contribution of research in foreign language contexts. In Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C.A., eds. Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C. A. (2012). Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Cummins, J. (1988). Language for empowerment. In Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Cummins, J., eds. Minority education: From shame to struggle. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 390–95.Google Scholar

Svendsen, C. and Krebs, K. (1984). Identifying English for the job: Examples from healthcare occupations. The ESP Journal, 3, 153–64.Google Scholar

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tinker Sachs, G. (2009). Taking risks in task-based teaching and learning. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 91–112.Google Scholar

Torres, J. and Serafini, E. J. (2016). Micro-evaluating learners’ task-specific motivation in a task-based business Spanish course. Hispania, 99, 289–304.Google Scholar

Van Avermaet, P. and Gysen, S. (2006). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based approach. In Van den Branden, K., ed. Task-based language teaching in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–46.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language teaching: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J. M., eds. Task-based language teaching: A reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H., and Schiffrin, D., eds. The handbook of discourse analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 466–85.Google Scholar

West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27, 1–19.Google Scholar

Woolard, K. A. and Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82.Google Scholar

Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS] (2016a). National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social survey. Retrieved from www.abs.gov.auGoogle Scholar

Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS] (2016b). Schools, Australia. Retrieved from www.abs.gov.auGoogle Scholar

Commonwealth of Australia (2016) Finance and Public Administration References Committee: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander experience of law enforcement and justice services. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar

East, M. (2017). Task-based teaching and learning: Pedagogical implications. In Van Deusen-Scholl, N. and May, S., eds. Second and foreign language education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Gilabert, R. (2005). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar

Grote, E. and Rochecouste, J. (2012). Language and the classroom setting. In Beresford, Q. and Partington, G., eds. Reform and resistance in Aboriginal education. Crawley, WA: UWA Press.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oliver, R. (2020). Developing authentic tasks for the workplace using needs analysis: A case study of Australian Aboriginal vocational students. In Lambert, C. and Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2012). Addressing the language and literacy needs of Aboriginal high School VET students who speak SAE as an additional language. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41(2), 1–11.Google Scholar

Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013a). Needs analysis for task-based language teaching: A case study of Indigenous vocational education and training students who speak EAL/EAD. TESOL in Context, 22(2), 36–50.Google Scholar

Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013b). A task-based needs analysis for Australian Aboriginal students: Going beyond the target situation to address cultural issues. International Journal of Training Research, 11(3), 246–59.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005), ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar

Loewen, S. (2004). Second language concerns for refugee children. In Hamilton, R. and Moore, D., eds. Educational interventions for refugee children: Theoretical perspectives and implementing best practice. London: Routledge, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar

Miller, J., Austin Windle, J., and Yazdanpanah, L. K. (2014). Planning lessons for refugee-background students: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9(1), 38–48.Google Scholar

Calvert, M. and Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 226–44.Google Scholar

Aykırı, K. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıflarındaki Suriyeli öğrencilerin eğitim durumlarına ilişkin görüşleri. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 2, 44–56.Google Scholar

Er, A. R. and Bayındır, N. (2015). İlkokula giden mülteci çocuklara yönelik sınıf öğretmenlerinin pedagojik yaklaşımları. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(4), 175–85.Google Scholar

Ergen, H. and Şahin, E. (2019). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin Suriyeli öğrencilerin eğitimi ile ilgili yaşadıkları problemler. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(44), 377–405.Google Scholar

Kiremit, R. F., Akpınar, Ü., and Akcan, A. T. (2018). Suriyeli öğrencilerin okula uyumları hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(6), 2139–49.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005), ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olgun-Baytaş, M. and Toker, Ş. (2019). Translanguaging as a pedagogical approach with Syrian refugee learners in Turkey: Lessons learned from a collaborative inquiry. Individual paper presentation at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.Google Scholar

Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar

Serafini, E. J. and Torres, J. (2015). The utility of needs analysis for nondomain expert instructors in designing task‐based Spanish for the professions curricula. Foreign Language Annals, 48(3), 447–72.Google Scholar

UNHRC. (2018). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.unhcr.org/5d08d7ee7.pdf.Google Scholar

UNHRC. (2019). Syria regional refugee response. Retrieved from: https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria/location/113.Google Scholar

Uzun, E. M. and Bütün, E. (2016). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarındaki suriyeli sığınmacı çocukların karşılaştıkları sorunlar hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Uluslararası Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 72–83.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., and Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapters 6–7.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2004). Reverse-engineering communication tasks. ELT Journal, 58(1), 18–27.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2020). Instructional frameworks for using tasks in task-based instruction. In Lambert, C. and Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. and Robinson, P. (2014). Learning to perform a narrative task: A semester long study of task sequencing effects. In Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., and Robinson, P., eds. Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 207–30.Google Scholar

Educational Testing Service (2008). TOEIC test data and analysis 2007: Number of examinees and scores in FY2007. The Institute for International Business Corporation, TOEIC Steering Committee.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., and Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapters 6–7.Google Scholar

Hillman, K. and Long, M. (2020). A task-based needs analysis for US Foreign Service officers: The challenge of the Japanese celebration speech. In Lambert, C. and Oliver, R, eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (1998). The role of the learner in classroom task performance. Journal of Nanzan Junior College, 26, 85–101.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2001). The viability of learner’ beliefs and opinions as input for L2 course design. RELC Journal, 32(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2002). Task sequencing and affective performance variables. Kitakyushu University Faculty of Foreign Studies Bulletin, 103, 97–175.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2004). Reverse-engineering communication tasks. ELT Journal, 58(1), 18–27.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2010). Task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 99–112.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2017). Tasks, affect and second language performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 657–64.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2019). Referent similarity and nominal syntax in task-based language teaching. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2020). Instructional frameworks for using tasks in task-based instruction. In Lambert, C., andOliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. and Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in task-based research: Toward more developmentally-based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 607–14.Google Scholar

Lambert, C., Kormos, J., and Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 167–96.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. and Nakamura, S. (2019). Proficiency-related variation in syntactic complexity: A study of English L1 and L2 oral descriptive discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29, 248–64.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. and Minn, D. (2007). Personal investment in L2 task design and learning: A study of two Japanese learners of English. ELIA: Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 7, 127–48.Google Scholar

Lambert, C., Philp, J., and Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in L2 task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–80.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. and Robinson, P. (2014). Learning to perform narrative tasks: A semester-long study of task sequencing effects. In Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., and Robinson, P., eds. Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 207–30.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. and Zhang, G. (2019). Engagement in the use of English and Chinese as second languages: The role of learner-generated content in instructional task design. Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 391–411.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1990). Task, group and task-group interactions. In Anivan, S., ed. Language teaching methodology for the nineties. Singapore: Regional English Language Centre, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In Lambert, R. D. and Shohamy, E., eds. Language policy and pedagogy.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 191–96.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In Long, M., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2010). Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In Putz, M. and Sicola, L., eds. Inside the learner’s mind: Cognitive processing in second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 243–68.Google Scholar

West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Baralt, M. and López-Bravo, M. (2016). Teaching Chinese as a foreign language: A classroom study on the timing of grammar around a task. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 5, 27–61.Google Scholar

East, M. (2012). Task-based learning from the teachers’ perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

McDonough, K. and Chaitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–32.Google Scholar

Orton, J. (2011). Educating Chinese language teachers: Some fundamentals. In Tsung, L. and Cruickshank, K., eds. Teaching and learning Chinese in global contexts. London: Continuum, 151–64.Google Scholar

Zheng, X. and Borg, S. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 18, 205–21.Google Scholar

Zhang, E. Y. (2007). TBLT-innovation in primary school English language teaching in mainland China. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–91.Google Scholar

Baralt, M. (2018). Becoming a task-based teacher educator. TBLT as a researched pedagogy. Samuda, V. Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M., eds. TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., and Robinson, P. (2014). Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Baralt, M. and López-Bravo, M. (2016). Teaching Chinese as a foreign language: A classroom study on the timing of grammar around a task. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 5, 27–61.Google Scholar

Bygate, M., Samuda, V., and Van den Branden, K., (2018), eds. Task-based Language Teaching as a researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639–62.Google Scholar

East, M. (2012). Task-based learning from the teachers’ perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Esteban, M. (2016). Spain’s relations with China: Friends but not partners. Chinese Political Science Review, 1, 373–86.Google Scholar

González Puy, I. (2012). El español en China. In VV. AA., El español en el mundo. Anuario del Instituto Cervantes, capítulo dos. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes.Google Scholar

Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2017). Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Markee, N. (2007). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mazzaferro, G. (2018). Translanguaging as everyday practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

McDonough, K. and Chaitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–32.Google Scholar

Phillips, T. (2018). Study of Portuguese and Spanish explodes as China expands role in Latin America. The Guardian. Retrieved on October 10, 2019 from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/02/study-of-portuguese-and-spanish-explodes-as-china-expands-role-in-latin-americaGoogle Scholar

Phipps, S. and Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37, 380–90.Google Scholar

Sachs, G. T. (2007). The challenges of adopting and adapting task-based cooperative teaching and learning in an EFL context. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–64.Google Scholar

Samuda, V. (2015). Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 271–301.Google Scholar

Scrimgeour, A. (2010). The yin-yang of Chinese language teaching in Australia: The challenges native speaker trainee teachers face in the Chinese classroom. In Liddicoat, A. J., ed. Languages in Australian education: Problems, prospects and future directions. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 127–44.Google Scholar

Wang, F. (2019). The status of Spanish language teachers in China. Paper presented at Qingdao University, June, 2019.Google Scholar

Willis, D. and Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2006), ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164–81.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J. (2009), eds, Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Zheng, X. and Borg, S. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China:Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 18, 205–21.Google Scholar

Zhang, E. Y. (2007). TBLT-innovation in primary school English language teaching in mainland China. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–91.Google Scholar

Zhou, W. and Li, G. (2015). Chinese language teachers’ expectations and perceptions of American students’ behavior: Exploring the nexus of cultural differences and classroom management. System, 49, 17–27.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2008). Elaboration and simplification in scripted and genuine telephone service encounters. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 46(2), 137–66.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). Analyzing target discourse. In Long, M. H., Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 169–204.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2020). Optimal input for language learning: genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated? Language Teaching, 53(2), 169–82.Google Scholar

O’Connell, S. P. (2014). A task-based language teaching approach to the police traffic stop. TESL Canada, 31(8), 116–31.Google Scholar

Oh, S.-Y. (2001). Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 69–96.Google Scholar

Bartlett, N. D. (2005). A double shot 2% mocha latte, please, with whip: Service encounters in two coffee shops and at a coffee cart. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 305–43.Google Scholar

Borro, I. (2020). Enhanced incidental learning of formulaic sequences by Chinese learners of Italian. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Portsmouth.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C. J., eds. Handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 269–93.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cathcart, R. (1989). Authentic discourse and the survival English curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 23(1), 105–26.Google Scholar

Chaudron, C. (1982). Vocabulary elaboration in teachers’ speech to L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 170–80.Google Scholar

Farshi, N. and Tavakoli, M. (2019). Effects of differences in language aptitude on learning grammatical collocations under elaborated input conditions. Language Teaching Research. DOI: 10.1177/1362168819858443Google Scholar

Gilabert, R. and Castellvi, J (2019). Task and syllabus design for morphologically complex languages. In Schwieter, J. W. and Benati, A., eds. Cambridge handbook of language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 527–49.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2008). Elaboration and simplification in scripted and genuine telephone service encounters. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 46(2), 137–66.Google Scholar

Hillman, K. (2021). Effects of different types of auditory input on incidental vocabulary learning by L2 Japanese learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation in second language acquisition. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Hillman, K. and Long, M. H. (2020). A task-based needs analysisfor US Foreign Service Officers, and the challenge of the Japanese celebration speech. InLambert, C. and, Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 123–45.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–93.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–41.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needsanalysis. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2009). Methodological principles in language teaching. InLong, M. H. and Doughty, C. J., eds. Handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 373–94.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). Analyzing target discourse. InLong, M. H., Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 169–204.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2018). Needs analysis. InChapelle, C., ed. The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2020). Optimal input for language learning: genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated? Language Teaching, 53(2), 169–82.Google Scholar

Long, M. H., Lee, J., and Hillman, K. (2019). Task-based language learning. InSchwieter, J. W. and Benati, A., eds. Cambridge handbook of language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 500–26.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. and Ross, S. (1993). Modifications that preserve language and content. In Tickoo, M., ed. Simplification: Theory and application. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar

Malicka, A., Gilabert Guerrero, R., and Norris, J. M. (2019).From needs analysisto task design: Insights from an English for specific purposes context. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 78–106.Google Scholar

O’Connell, S. P. (2014). A task-based language teaching approach to the police traffic stop. TESL Canada, 31(8), 116–31.Google Scholar

Oh, S.-Y. (2001). Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 69–96.Google Scholar

Scotton, C. M. and Bernsten, J. (1988). Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue. Applied Linguistics, 9, 372–84.Google Scholar

Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. H. and Coulthard, M. (1975). The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taborn, S. (1983). The transactional dialogue: Misjudged, misused, misunderstood. ELT Journal, 37(3), 207–12.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164–81.Google Scholar

White, L. (1989). Against comprehensible input. The Input Hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 95–110.Google Scholar

Williams, M. (1988). Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common? Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 45–58.Google Scholar

Yano, Y., Long, M. H., and Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189–219.Google Scholar

Chaudron, C. J., Doughty, C. J., Kim, Y., Kong, D.-K, Lee, J., Lee, Y.-G., Long, M. H., Rivers, R., and Urano, K. (2005). A task-based needs analysisof a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–61.Google Scholar

Bartlett, N. D. (2005). A double shot 2% mocha latte, please, with whip: Service encounters in two coffee shops and at a coffee cart. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 305–43.Google Scholar

Hillman, K. and Long, M. H. (2020). A task-based needs analysis for US Foreign Service Officers, and the challenge of the Japanese celebration speech. In Lambert, C., and Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 123–145Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). Analyzing target discourse. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 169–204.Google Scholar

O’Connell, S. P. (2014). A task-based language teaching approach to the police traffic stop, TESL Canada, 31(8), 116–31.Google Scholar

Anthony, L. (2017). AntConc (Version 3.5.2) [Windows]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from: http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html.Google Scholar

Baker, M. (1988). Sub-technical vocabulary and the ESP teacher: An analysis of some rhetorical items in medical journal articles. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4, 91–105.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 600 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved from: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. and Berenz, N. (1993). Transcribing conversational exchanges. In Edwards, J. A. and Lampert, M. D., eds. Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 91–121.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2007). Is there an “academic vocabulary”? TESOL Quarterly, 41, 235–54.Google Scholar

Keith, M. C. (1993). AM radio: The status and struggle. Journal of Radio Studies, 2, 1–10.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2019). Optimal input for language learning: Genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated? Language Teaching, 53(2) 169–82.Google Scholar

Maie, R. and Salen, B. (2018, March). Task-based analysis of target discourse in media weather forecasts. Paper presented for the TESOL 2018 International Convention & English Language Expo, Chicago: IL.Google Scholar

Murphy, A. H. and Brown, B. G. (1983a). Forecast terminology: Composition and interpretation of public weather forecasts. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 64, 13–22.Google Scholar

Murphy, A. H. and Brown, B. G. (1983b). Interpretation of some terms and phrases in public weather forecasts. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 64, 1283–89.Google Scholar

National Research Council. (2010). When weather matters: Science and services to meet critical societal needs. Washington DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center (2018). Audio and podcasting fact sheet. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2018/07/State-of-the-News-Media_2017-Archive.pdf.Google Scholar

Winn, M. (2005). Collecting target discourse:The case of the US naturalization interview. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–304.Google Scholar

Wissler, L., Almashraee, M., Díaz, D. M., and Paschke, A. (2014, June). The gold standard in corpus annotation. Paper presented for the IEEE German Student Conference, University of Passau, Germany.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Lloret, M. (2019). TBLT and L2 pragmatics. In Taguchi, N., ed. The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Long, M. H., ed. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simpson-Vlach, R. C. and Leicher, S. (2006). The MICASE handbook: A resource for users of the Michigan corpus of academic spoken English. Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Taguchi, N. and Kim, Y. (2018), eds. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Youn, S. J. (2018). Task-based needs analysis of L2 pragmatics in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 86–98.Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, B. S. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 279–304.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–57.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., and Taguchi, N. (2018). Second language pragmatics: From theory to research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W., and Schneider, S., eds. New approaches to hedging. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar

Gilabert, R. (2005). Evaluation the use of multiple sources and methods in needs analysis:A case study of journalists in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia (Spain). In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–99.Google Scholar

González-Lloret, M. (2008). “No me llames de usted, tratame de tu”: L2 address behavior development through synchronous computer-mediated communication Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.Google Scholar

González-Lloret, M. and Nielson, K. B. (2014). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 525–49.Google Scholar

Hillman, K. K. and Long, M. H. (2020). Target tasks for US foreign service officers: The challenge for TBLT of the Japanese celebration speech. In Lambert, C. and Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 123–145.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Reagan, D. and Payant, C. (2018). Task modality effects on Spanish learners’ interlanguage pragmatic development. In Taguchi, N. and Kim, Y., eds. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Ren, W. and Han, Z. (2016). The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 70(4), 424–34.Google Scholar

Sağdıç, A. (2019). From researchers to L2 classrooms: Teaching pragmatics through collaborative tasks. In Anwaruddin, S., ed. Knowledge mobilization in TESOL: Connecting research and practice. Leiden: Brill Publishing, pp. 113–27.Google Scholar

Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J., and Swales, J. M. (2002). The Michigan corpus of academic spoken English (MICASE). Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Skyrme, G. (2010). Is this a stupid question? International undergraduate students seeking help from teachers during office hours. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 211–21.Google Scholar

Taguchi, N. and Kim, Y. (2018), eds. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL-EJ, 8(2).Google Scholar

Youn, S. J. (2018). Task-based needs analysis of L2 pragmatics in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 86–98.Google Scholar