Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×

Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.

Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T20:28:54.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2025

Edited by
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
emlyon Business School
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 311 - 474
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Ansari, S., Wijen, F. and Gray, B. (2013), ‘Constructing a climate change logic: an institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons”’, Organization Science, 24/4: 1014–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baba, S., Sasaki, I. and Vaara, E. (2021), ‘Increasing dispositional legitimacy: progressive legitimation dynamics in a trajectory of settlements’ Academy of Management Journal, 64/6: 1927–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R. (2017), ‘Coalface institutionalism’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Meyer, R. E. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 338–64. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Battilana, J. and d’Aunno, T. (2009), ‘Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency’, in Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., and Leca, B. (eds), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations: 31–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battilana, J. and Dorado, S. (2010), ‘Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 53/6: 1419–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battilana, J. and Lee, M. (2014), ‘Advancing research on hybrid organizing: insights from the study of social enterprises’, Academy of Management Annals, 8/1: 397–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battilana, J., Leca, B. and Boxenbaum, E. (2009), ‘How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship’, Academy of Management Annals, 3/1: 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bento da Silva, J. and Quattrone, P. (2021), ‘Mystery-driven institutionalism: the Jesuit spiritual exercises as a book of practices leading nowhere’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 71, On Practice and Institution: New Empirical Directions: 145–64. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Besharov, M. and Smith, W. (2014), ‘Multiple logics in organizations: explaining their varied nature and implications’, Academy of Management Review, 39/3: 364–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besharov, M. L. and Mitzineck, B. C. (2020), ‘Organizational hybridity: perspectives, processes, promises’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 69, Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carberry, E. J. and King, B. G. (2012), ‘Defensive practice adoption in the face of organizational stigma: impression management and the diffusion of stock option expensing’, Journal of Management Studies, 49/7: 1137–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2018), ‘Beyond constraining and enabling: toward new microfoundations for institutional theory’, Academy of Management Review, 43/1: 132–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacin, M. T., Munir, K. and Tracey, P. (2010), ‘Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance’, Academy of Management Journal, 53/6: 1393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalpiaz, E., Rindova, V. and Ravasi, D. (2016), ‘Combining logics to transform organizational agency: blending industry and art at Alessi’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 61/3: 347–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmestri, G. (2006), ‘Streams of inconsistent institutional influences: middle managers as carriers of multiple identities’, Human Relations, 59/11: 1515–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Lamothe, L. and Langley, A. (2001), ‘The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 44/4: 809–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2007), ‘Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames’, Human Relations, 60/1: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (1988), ‘Interest and agency in institutional theory’, in Zucker, L. G. (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment: 3–21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (1997), ‘Culture and cognition’, Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983), ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, 48/2: 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorado, S. (2005), ‘Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking and convening’, Organization Studies, 26/3: 385–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, M. (1997), ‘Manifesto for a relational sociology’, American Journal of Sociology, 103/2: 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998), ‘What is agency?’, American Journal of Sociology, 103/4: 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzion, D. and Ferraro, F. (2010), ‘The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting’, Organization Science, 21/5: 1092–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, R. (2021), ‘Toward a religious institutionalism: ontologies, teleologies and the Godding of institution’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D.A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 70, On Practice and Institution: Theorizing the Interface: 29–118. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Friedland, R. and Arjaliès, D.-L. (2021), ‘Putting things in place: institutional objects and institutional logics’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D.A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 71, On Practice and Institution: New Empirical Directions: 45–86. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Friedland, R. and Alford, R. R. (1991), ‘Bringing society back in: symbols, practices and institutional contradictions’, in Powell, W., and DiMaggio, P. (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 232–63. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gawer, A. and Phillips, N. (2013), ‘Institutional work as logics shift: the case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader’, Organization Studies, 34/8: 1035–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Goodrick, E. and Reay, T. (2011), ‘Constellations of institutional logics’, Work and Occupations, 38/3: 372–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. R. (1996), ‘Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism’, Academy of Management Review, 21/4: 1022–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R. and Suddaby, R. (2006), ‘Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms’, Academy of Management Journal, 49/1: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R. and Whetten, D. A. (2014), ‘Rethinking institutions and organizations’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/7: 1206–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Jennings, P. D. and Hinings, C. R. (2015), ‘Sustainability and organizational change: an institutional perspective’, in Henderson, R., Gulati, R., and Tushman, M. (eds), Leading Sustainable Change: An Organizational Perspective: 323–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. and Hinings, C. R. (2002), ‘Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields’, Academy of Management Journal, 45/1: 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Magàn Diaz, A., Li, S. and Céspedes Lorente, J. (2010), ‘The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses’, Organization Science, 21/2: 521–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micellota, E. and Lounsbury, M. (2011), ‘Institutional complexity and organizational responses’, Academy of Management Annals, 5/1: 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Meyer, R. E. (2017), ‘Introduction: into the fourth decade’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Meyer, R. E. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 1–24. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gümüşay, A. A., Smets, M. and Morris, T. (2020), ‘“God at work”: engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity’, Academy of Management Journal, 63/1: 124–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, C. E., Lawrence, T. B. and Tracey, P. (2017), ‘Institutional work: taking stock and making it matter’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Meyer, R. E. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 558–90. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hardy, C. and Phillips, N. (1998), ‘Strategies of engagement: lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain’, Organization Science, 9/2: 217–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrave, T. J. and van de Ven, A. H. (2006), ‘A collective action model of institutional innovation’, Academy of Management Review, 31/4: 864–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimer, C. A. (1999), ‘Competing institutions: law, medicine, and family in neonatal intensive care’, Law and Society Review, 33/1: 17–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfen, M. and Sydow, J. (2013), ‘Negotiating as institutional work: the case of labour standards and international framework agreements’, Organization Studies, 34/8: 1073–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. and Lounsbury, M. (1997), ‘Putting the organization back into organization theory’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 6/1: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosking, D. M. (2011), ‘Telling tales of relations: appreciating relational constructionism’, Organization Studies, 32/1: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jancsary, D., Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A. and Barberio, V. (2017), ‘Toward a structural model of organizational-level institutional pluralism and logic interconnectedness’, Organization Science, 28/6: 1150–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. and van de Ven, A. H. (2013), ‘How the recursive relationship between paradoxes shapes restructuring over time’, Strategic Organization, 11/3: 245–80.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, P. and Smets, M. (2013), ‘Material artifacts: practices for doing strategy with “stuff”’, European Management Journal, 31/1: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Smets, M., Bednarek, R., Burke, G. and Spee, P. (2013), ‘Institutional ambidexterity: leveraging institutional complexity in practice’, in Lounsbury, M., and Boxenbaum, E. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. XXXIX, Institutional Logics in Action, part B: 37–61. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kaplan, S., Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2016), ‘On the risk of studying practices in isolation: linking what, who, and how in strategy research’, Strategic Organization, 14/3: 248–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaghan, W. and Lounsbury, M. (2011), ‘Institutions and work’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 20/1: 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, K. C. (2009), ‘Operating room: relational spaces and micro-institutional change in surgery’, American Journal of Sociology, 115/3: 657–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J. and Yates, J. (2006), ‘Life in the trading zone: structuring coordination across boundaries in post-bureaucratic organizations’, Organization Science, 17/1: 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraatz, M. S. and Block, E. (2017), ‘Institutional pluralism revisited’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Meyer, R. E. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 532–57. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. and Lorsch, J. W. (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. and Suddaby, R. (2006), ‘Institutions and institutional work’, in Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Nord, W. R. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies: 215–53. 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. and Leca, B. (2009), ‘Introduction: theorizing and studying institutional work’, in Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., and Leca, B. (eds), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations: 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. and Leca, B. (2011), ‘Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 20/1: 52–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A. and King, T. (1991), ‘Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: an organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36/3: 333–63.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M. (2001), ‘Institutional sources of practice variation: staffing college and university recycling programs’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46/1: 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M. (2002), ‘Institutional transformation and status mobility: the professionalization of the field of finance’, Academy of Management Journal, 45/1: 255–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M. (2007), ‘A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds’, Academy of Management Journal, 50/2: 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M. and Beckman, C. (2015), ‘Celebrating organization theory’, Journal of Management Studies, 52/2: 288–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M. and Boxenbaum, E. (eds) (2013), Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Institutional Logics in Action, vol. XXXIX. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M. and Crumley, E. T. (2007), ‘New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation’, Organization Studies, 28/7: 993–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M. A. (2001), ‘Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 22/6–7: 545–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M. and Wang, M. (2020), ‘Into the clearing: back to the future of constitutive institutional analysis’, Organization Theory, 1: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A. and Spee, P. (2021a), ‘On practice and institution’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 70, On Practice and Institution: Theorizing the Interface: 1–28. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A. and Spee, P. (2021b), ‘On practice and institution’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 71, On Practice and Institution: New Empirical Directions: 1–28. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., Steele, C. W. J., Wang, M. S. and Toubiana, M. (2021), ‘New directions in the study of institutional logics: from tools to phenomena’, Annual Review of Sociology, 47/1: 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, S., Hardy, C. and Lawrence, T. (2004), ‘Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/5: 657–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1981), ‘Footnotes to organizational change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26/4: 563–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. D. (1982), ‘Adapting to environmental jolts’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27/4: 515–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. (1977), ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83/2: 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micelotta, E. R. and Washington, M. (2013), ‘Institutions and maintenance: the repair work of Italian professions’, Organization Studies, 34/8: 1137–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micelotta, E. R., Lounsbury, M. and Greenwood, R. (2017), ‘Pathways of institutional change: an integrative review and research agenda’, Journal of Management, 43: 1885–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountford, N. and Cai, Y. (2022), ‘Towards a flatter ontology of institutional logics: how logics relate in situations of institutional complexity’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 25/2.Google Scholar
Mutch, A., Delbridge, R. and Ventresca, M. (2006), ‘Situating organizational action: the relational sociology of organizations’, Organization, 13/5: 607–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D., Reinecke, J. and Ismail, M. A. (2021), ‘You’re grounded!: toward a theory of enactive legitimation, materiality and practice’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 71, On Practice and Institution: New Empirical Directions: 1–28. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W., Thornton, P. and Lounsbury, M. (2017), ‘Advances to the institutional logics perspective’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Meyer, R. E. (eds), Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 535–58. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (1996), ‘Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective’, Information Systems Research, 7/1: 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002), ‘Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing’, Organization Science, 13/3: 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2010), ‘The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34/1: 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. and Scott, S. V. (2008), ‘Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization’, Academy of Management Annals, 2/1: 433–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pache, A.-C. and Santos, F. (2010), ‘When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands’, Academy of Management Review, 35/3: 455–76.Google Scholar
Pache, A.-C. and Santos, F. (2013a), ‘Embedded in hybrid contexts: how individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics’, in Lounsbury, M., and Boxenbaum, E. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. XXXIX, Institutional Logics in Action, Part B: 3–35. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Pache, A.-C. and Santos, F. (2013b), ‘Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics’, Academy of Management Journal, 56/4: 972–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. and Hardy, C. (2004), ‘Discourse and institutions’, Academy of Management Review, 29/4: 635–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulkarni, M., Solansky, S. T. and Travis, D. V. (2007), ‘Radical change accidentally: the emergence and amplification of small change’, Academy of Management Journal, 50/3: 515–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W. W. and Rerup, C. (2017), ‘Opening the black box: microfoundations of institutional theory’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Meye, R. E. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 311–37. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, A., Vermeulen, P., Meeus, M. and Zietsma, C. (2015), ‘I need time! Exploring pathways to compliance under institutional complexity’, Academy of Management Journal, 58/1: 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus, T., Vaccaro, A. and Brusoni, S. (2017), ‘Institutional complexity in turbulent times: formalization, collaboration, and the emergence of blended logics’, Academy of Management Journal, 60/4: 1253–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, T. and Hinings, C. R. (2009), ‘Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics’, Organization Studies, 30/6: 629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K. and Germann, K. (2006), ‘Legitimizing a new role: small wins and microprocesses of change’, Academy of Management Journal, 49/5: 977–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauermann, H. and Stephan, P. (2013), ‘Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science’, Organization Science, 24/3: 889–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2001), ‘Introduction: practice theory’, in Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., and von Savigny, E. (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory: 1–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2002), The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2006), ‘On organizations as they happen’, Organization Studies, 27/12: 1863–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2021), ‘Forming alliances’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 70, On Practice and Institution: Theorizing the Interface: 119–38. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Schildt, H., Kodeih, F. and Tarabichi, H. (2021), ‘Field-level evaluation practices and practice experimentation: social impact bonds and market logic encroachment in the field of social integration’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A., and Spee, P. (eds), On Practice and Institution: New Empirical Directions: 117–44. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1987), ‘The adolescence of institutional theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32/4: 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies’, Organization Studies, 35/10: 1407–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seo, M. G. and Creed, W. E. D. (2002), ‘Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 27/2: 222–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, M. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2013), ‘Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: a relational model of institutional work and complexity’, Human Relations, 66/10: 1279–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, M., Aristidou, A. and Whittington, R. (2017), ‘Towards a practice-driven institutionalism’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Meyer, R. E. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 365–91.London: Sage.Google Scholar
Smets, M., Morris, T. and Greenwood, R. (2012), ‘From practice to field: a multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change’, Academy of Management Journal, 55/4: 877–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, P. and Burke, G. (2015), ‘Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice’, Academy of Management Journal, 58/3: 932–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. K. and Besharov, M. L. (2019), ‘Bowing before dual gods: how structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 64/1: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2009), ‘Strategy tools as boundary objects’, Strategic Organization, 7/2: 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2011), ‘Strategic planning as communicative process’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C., Hannigan, T. R., Glaser, V., Toubiana, M. and Gehman, J. (2021), ‘Macrofoundations: exploring the institutionally situated nature of activity’, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 68: 3–16.Google Scholar
Strang, D. and Meyer, J. W. (1993), ‘Institutional conditions for diffusion’, Theory and Society, 22/4: 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. (2005), ‘Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50/1: 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R., Seidl, D. and Lê, J. (2013), ‘Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory’, Strategic Organization, 11/3: 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P. H. (2002), ‘The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: conflict and conformity in institutional logics’, Academy of Management Journal, 45/1: 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P. H. (2004), Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Educational Publishing. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P. H. and Ocasio, W. (1999), ‘Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990’, American Journal of Sociology, 105/3: 801–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. and Lounsbury, M. (2012), The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L. G. (1983), ‘Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28/1: 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townley, B. (1997), ‘The institutional logic of performance appraisal’, Organization Studies, 18/2: 261–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, P., Phillips, N. and Jarvis, O. (2011), ‘Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: a multilevel model’, Organization Science, 22/1: 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsoukas, H. and Cummings, S. (1997), ‘Marginalization and recovery: the emergence of Aristotelian themes in organization studies’, Organization Studies, 18/4: 655–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Ven, A., Ganco, M. and Hinings, C. R. (2013), ‘Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional design’, Academy of Management Annals, 7/1: 393–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M.S. and Lounsbury, M. (2021), ‘Cultural encounters: a practice-driven institutional approach to the study of organizational culture’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 71, On Practice and Institution: New Empirical Directions: 1–28. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Whittington, R. (1996), ‘Strategy as practice’, Long Range Planning, 29/5: 731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zietsma, C. and Lawrence, T. B. (2010), ‘Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55/2: 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilber, T. B. (2002), ‘Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: the case of a rape crisis center in Israel’, Academy of Management Journal, 45/1: 234–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilber, T. B. (2011), ‘Institutional multiplicity in practice: a tale of two high-tech conferences in Israel’, Organization Science, 22/6: 1539–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilber, T. B. (2021), ‘Practice-driven institutionalism: a path toward a fruitful borrowing’, in Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A., and Spee, P. (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 70, On Practice and Institution: Theorizing the Interface: 225–42. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. G. (1983), ‘Organizations as institutions’, in Bacharach, S. B. (ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations: 1–47. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. G. (1987), ‘Institutional theories of organization’, Annual Review of Sociology, 13/1: 443–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Abend, S. A. (1974), ‘Problems of identity: theoretical and clinical applications’, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 43/4: 606–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albert, S. and Whetten, D. A. (1985), ‘Organizational identity’, in Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. VII: 263–95. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E. and Dutton, J. E. (2000), ‘Organizational identity and identification: charting new waters and building new bridges’, Academy of Management Review, 25/1: 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (2002), ‘Identity regulation as organizational control: producing the appropriate individual’, Journal of Management Studies, 39/5: 619–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anteby, M. and Molnár, V. (2012), ‘Collective memory meets organizational identity: remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history’, Academy of Management Journal, 55/3: 515–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, C, and Tripsas, M. (2016), ‘Organizational identity and innovation’, in Pratt, M., Ashforth, B. E., and Ravasi, D. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity: 417–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E. and Johnson, S. A. (2001), ‘Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts’, in Hogg, M. A., and Terry, D. J. (eds), Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts: 31–48. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. (1989), ‘Social identity theory and the organization’, Academy of Management Review, 14/1: 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. (1996), ‘Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Dutton, J. E. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XIII, The Embeddedness of Strategy: 19–64. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E. and Reingen, P. (2014), ‘Functions of dysfunction: managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 59/3: 474–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H. and Corley, K. G. (2008), ‘Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions’, Journal of Management, 34/3: 325–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Rogers, K. M. and Corley, K. G. (2011), ‘Identity in organizations: exploring cross-level dynamics’, Organization Science, 22/5: 1144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B., Schinoff, B. and Rogers, K. (2016), ‘“I identify with her,” “I identify with him”: unpacking the dynamics of personal identification in organizations’, Academy of Management Review, 41/1: 28–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17/1: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. and Stewart, A. C. (2000), ‘Organizational identity as moral philosophy: competitive implications for diversified companies’, in Schultz, M., Hatch, M. J., and Holten Larsen, M. (eds), The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand: 36–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basque, J. and Langley, A. (2018), ‘Invoking Alphonse: the founder figure as a historical resource for organizational identity work’, Organization Studies, 39/12: 1685–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, J., Galvin, B., Ashforth, B. and Hafermalz, E. (2020), ‘Putting identification into motion: a dynamic view of organizational identification,’ Organization Science, 31/1: 200–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojovic, N., Sabatier, V. and Coblence, E. (2020), ‘Becoming through doing: how experimental spaces enable organizational identity work’, Strategic Organization, 18/1: 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1991), ‘The social self: on being the same and different at the same time’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17/5: 475–82.Google Scholar
Brown, A. D. (2006), ‘A narrative approach to collective identities’, Journal of Management Studies, 43/4: 731–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D. and Humphreys, M. (2002), ‘Nostalgia and the narrativization of identity: a Turkish case study’, British Journal of Management,13/2: 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprar, C., Walker, B. and Ashforth, B. (2022), ‘The dark side of strong identification in organizations: a conceptual review’, Academy of Management Annals, 16/2: 759–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chreim, S. (2007), ‘Social and temporal influences on interpretations of organizational identity and acquisition integration’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43/4: 449–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S. M., Gioia, D. A., Ketchen, D. J. and Thomas, J. B. (2010), ‘Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55/3: 397–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S., Kornberger, M. and Rhodes, C. (2005), ‘Learning/becoming/doing’, Organization, 12/2: 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S., Rhodes, C. and Kornberger, M. (2007), ‘Desperately seeking legitimacy: organizational identity and emerging industries’, Organization Studies, 28/4: 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, K. and Gioia, D. (2004), ’Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, K. G., Harquail, C. V., Pratt, M. G., Glynn, M. A., Fiol, C. M. and Hatch, M. J. (2006), ‘Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15/2: 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J. (2002), ‘On the “organizational identity” metaphor’, British Journal of Management, 13/3: 259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J., Haslam, S. A. and Balmer, J. M. T. (2007), ‘Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products’, British Journal of Management, 18/S1: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, C. and Brown, A. D. (2004), ‘Constructing organizational identities on the web: a case study of Royal Dutch/Shell’, Journal of Management Studies, 41: 1325–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dameron, S., Lê, J. K. and LeBaron, C. (2015), ‘Materializing strategy and strategizing materials: why matter matters’, British Journal of Management, 26, S1–S12.Google Scholar
Deephouse, D. L. (1999), ‘To be different, or to be the same: it’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance’, Strategic Management Journal, 20/2: 147–66.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2007), ‘Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames’, Human Relations, 60/1: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J. E. and Dukerich, J. M. (1991), ‘Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaptation’, Academy of Management Journal, 34/3: 517–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J. E. and Penner, W. (1993), ‘The importance of organizational identity for strategic agenda building’, in Hendry, J., Johnson, G., and Newton, J. (eds), Strategic Thinking: Leadership and the Management of Change: 89–113. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M. and Harquail, C. V. (1994), ‘Organizational images and member identification’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39/2: 239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C. and Grossman, P. (2005), ‘Managing diversity by creating team identity’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58/3: 371–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D. and Haslam, S. A. (2004), ‘Motivating individuals and groups at work: a social identity perspective on leadership and group performance’, Academy of Management Review, 29/3: 459–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsbach, K. D. and Kramer, R. M. (1996), ‘Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: encountering and countering the Business Week rankings’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41/3: 442–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1968), Identity, Youth and Crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Fachin, F. (2016), Organizational Identity Work in Open Innovation Entrepreneurship. Montreal, Canada: HEC Montreal.Google Scholar
Fiol, C. M. (2002), ‘Capitalizing on paradox: the role of language in transforming organizational identities’, Organization Science, 13/6: 653–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M. and Corley, K. G. (2000), ‘Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability’, Academy of Management Review, 25/1: 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Price, K. N., Hamilton, A. L. and Thomas, J. B. (2010), ‘Forging an identity: an insider–outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55/1: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L. and Corley, K. G. (2013), ‘Organizational identity formation and change’, Academy of Management Annals, 7/1: 123–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, M. A. (2000), ‘When cymbals become symbols: conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra’, Organization Science, 11/3: 285–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, M. A. (2008), ‘Beyond constraint: how institutions enable identities’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., and Suddaby, R. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 413–30. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Golant, B. D., Sillince, J. A., Harvey, C. and Maclean, M. (2015), ‘Rhetoric of stability and change: the organizational identity work of institutional leadership’, Human Relations, 68/4: 607–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, C. E., Tracey, P. and Weber, K. (2020), ‘The art of the pivot: how new ventures manage identification relationships with stakeholders as they change direction’, Academy of Management Journal, 63/2: 440–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. and Grant, D. (2005), ‘Discourse and collaboration: the role of conversations and collective identity’, Academy of Management Review, 30/1: 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harquail, C. V. and King, A. (2010), ‘Construing organizational identity: the role of embodied cognition’, Organization Studies, 31/12: 1619–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A., van Knippenberg, D. and Rast, D. E. (2012), ‘Intergroup leadership in organizations: leading across group and organizational boundaries’, Academy of Management Review, 37/2: 232–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J., Metzger, M. L. and Meyer, A. D. (2013), ‘Rekindling the flame: processes of identity resurrection’, Academy of Management Journal, 56/1: 113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, J., Lahneman, B. and Parmigiani, A. (2018), ‘Nested identities as cognitive drivers of strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39: 269–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, C., Kreutzer, K. and Vaara, E. (2020), ‘Political dynamics in organizational identity breach and reconstruction: findings from the crisis in UNICEF Germany’, Academy of Management Journal, 64/3, 948–80.Google Scholar
Jehn, K., Northcraft, G. and Neale, M. (1999), ‘Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in work-groups’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44/4: 741–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, R. (1996), Social Identity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P., Balogun, J. and Beech, N. (2010), ‘Researching strategists and their identity in practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 243–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjærgaard, A. (2009), ‘Organizational identity and strategy: an empirical study of organizational identity’s influence on the strategy-making process’, International Studies of Management & Organization, 39/1: 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouamé, S., Hafsi, T., Oliver, D. and Langley, A. (2022), ‘Creating and sustaining stakeholder emotional resonance with organizational identity in social mission-driven organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 65/6 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreiner, G. and Murphy, C. (2016), ‘Organizational identity work’, in Pratt, M., Schultz, M., Ashforth, B. E., and Ravasi, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity: 276–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E., Sheep, M. L., Smith, B. R. and Kataria, N. (2015), ‘Elasticity and the dialectic tensions of organizational identity: how can we hold together while we are pulling apart?’ Academy of Management Journal, 58/4: 981–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroezen, J. J. and Huegens, P. (2012), ‘Organizational identity formation: processes of identity imprinting and enactment in the Dutch microbrewing landscape’, in Schultz, M., Maguire, S., Langley, A., and Tsoukas, H. (eds), Constructing Identity in and around Organizations: 89–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, A., Oliver, D. and Rouleau, L. (2020), ‘Strategy and identities in organizations’, in Brown, A. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Identities in Organizations: 780–800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langley, A., Golden-Biddle, K., Reay, T., Denis, J. L., Hébert, Y., Lamothe, L. and Gervais, J. (2012), ‘Identity struggles in merging organizations: renegotiating the sameness–difference dialectic’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48/2: 135–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. and Phillips, N. (2019), Constructing Organizational Life: How Social-Symbolic Work Shapes Selves, Organizations and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lembke, S. and Wilson, G. (1998), ‘Putting the “team” into teamwork: alternative theoretical contributions for contemporary management practice’, Human Relations, 51/7: 927–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livengood, R. S. and Reger, R. K. (2010), ‘That’s our turf! Identity domains and competitive dynamics’, Academy of Management Review, 35/1: 48–66.Google Scholar
Maitlis, S. and Christianson, M. (2014), ‘Sensemaking in organizations: taking stock and moving forward’, Academy of Management Annals, 8/1: 57–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massa, F., Helms, W., Voronov, M. and Wang, L., (2017), ‘Emotions uncorked: inspiring evangelism for the emerging practice of cool-climate winemaking in Ontario’, Academy of Management Journal, 60/2: 461–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nag, R., Corley, K. G. and Gioia, D. A. (2007), ‘The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting’, Academy of Management Journal, 50/4: 821–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, D. and Bürgi, P. (2005), ‘Organizational Identity as a Strategic Practice’, paper presented at the fourth ‘International critical management studies’ conference, Cambridge, 6 July.Google Scholar
Oliver, D. and Cole, B. (2019), ‘The interplay of product and process in skunkworks identity work: an inductive model’, Strategic Management Journal, 40/9: 1491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, D. and Roos, J. (2007), ‘Beyond text: constructing organizational identity multimodally’, British Journal of Management, 18/4: 342–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, D. and Vough, H. (2020), ‘Practicing identity in emergent firms: how practices shape founders’ organizational identity claims’, Strategic Organization, 18/1: 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002), ‘Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing’, Organization Science, 13/3: 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patvardhan, S., Gioia, D. and Hamilton, A. (2015), ‘Weathering a meta-level identity crisis: forging a coherent collective identity for an emerging field’, Academy of Management Journal, 58/2: 405–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petriglieri, J. (2011), ‘Under threat: responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities’, Academy of Management Review, 36/4: 641–62.Google Scholar
Petriglieri, J. and Devine, B. (2016), ‘Mobilizing organizational action against identity threats’, in Pratt, M., Schultz, M., Ashforth, B. E., and Ravasi, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity: 239–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, E. and Baker, T. (2014), ‘It’s what you make of it: founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity’, Academy of Management Journal, 57/5: 1406–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. G. (2000), ‘The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: managing identification among Amway distributors’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45/3: 456–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. G. (2003), ‘Disentangling collective identities’, in Polzer, J. T. (ed.), Identity Issues in Groups: 161–88. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. G. and Foreman, P. (2000), ‘Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities’, Academy of Management Review, 25/1: 18–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M.G. and Rafaeli, A. (1997), ‘Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities’, Academy of Management Journal, 40/4: 862–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W. and Kaufmann, J. B. (2006), ‘Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning among medical residents’, Academy of Management Journal, 49/2: 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravasi, D. and Phillips, N. (2011), ‘Strategies of alignment: organizational identity management and strategic change at Bang & Olufsen’, Strategic Organization, 9/2: 103–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravasi, D., Rindova, V. and Stigliani, I. (2019), ‘The stuff of legend: history, memory and the temporality of organizational identity construction’, Academy of Management Journal, 62/5: 1523–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravasi, D., Tripsas, M. and Langley, A. (2020), ‘Exploring the strategy-identity nexus’, Strategic Organization, 18/1: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reger, R. K., Gustafson, L. T., Demarie, S. M. and Mullane, J. V. (1994), ‘Reframing the organization: why implementing total quality is easier said than done’, Academy of Management Review, 19/3: 565–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reger, R. K., Barney, J., Bunderson, J., Foreman, P. O., Gustafson, L. T., Huff, A. S., Martins, L., Sarason, Y. and Stimpert, J. (1998), ‘A strategy conversation on the topic of organizational identity’, in Whetten, D. A., and Godfrey, P. (eds), Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations: 99–169. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Regnér, P. and Zander, U. (2011), ‘Knowledge and strategy creation in multinational companies’, Management International Review, 51/6: 821–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rughase, O. G. (2006), Identity and Strategy: How Individual Visions Enable the Design of a Market Strategy That Works. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M. and Hernes, T. (2013), ‘A temporal perspective on organizational identity’, Organization Science, 24/1: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M. and Hernes, T. (2020), ‘Temporal interplay between strategy and identity: punctuated, subsumed, and sustained modes’, Strategic Organization, 18/1: 106–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M., Maguire, S., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H. (eds) (2012), Constructing Identity in and around Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillince, J. (2006), ‘Resources and organizational identities: the role of rhetoric in the creation of competitive advantage’, Management Communication Quarterly, 20/2: 186–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillince, J. and Simpson, B. (2010), ‘The strategy and identity relationship: towards a processual understanding’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Lampel, J. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXVII, The Globalization of Strategy Research: 111–43. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Snow, D. A. and Anderson, L. (1987), ‘Identity work among the homeless: the verbal construction and avowal of personal identities’, American Journal of Sociology, 92/6: 1336–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanske, S., Rauch, M. and Canato, A. (2020), ‘Anti-identity strategizing: the dynamic interplay of “who we are” and “who we are not”’, Strategic Organization, 18/1: 136–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M. and Trank, C. Q. (2010), ‘Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Lampel, J. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXVII, The Globalization of Strategy Research: 147–73. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978), ‘Social categorization, social identity and social comparison’, in Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations: 61–76. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1985), ‘The social identity theory of intergroup behavior’, in Worchel, S., and Austin, W. G. (eds), Psychology of Intergroup Relations: 7–24. 2nd edn. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tracey, P. and Phillips, N. (2016), ‘Managing the consequences of organizational stigmatization: identity work in a social enterprise’, Academy of Management Journal, 59/3: 740–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripsas, M. (2009), ‘Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company”’, Organization Science, 20/2: 441–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1982), ‘Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group’, in Tajfel, H. (ed.), Social Identity and Inter-Group Relations: 15–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voss, Z., Cable, D. and Voss, G. (2006), ‘Organizational identity and firm performance: what happens when leaders disagree about “who we are”?’ Organization Science, 17/6: 741–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkiss, L. and Glynn, M. (2016), ‘Materiality and identity: how organizational products, artifacts, and practices instantiate organizational identity’, in Pratt, M., Schultz, M., Ashforth, B. E., and Ravasi, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, T. J. (2008), ‘Managing identity: identity work, personal predicaments and structural circumstances’, Organization, 15/1: 121–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, T. J. (2016), ‘Organizational identity and organizational identity work as valuable analytical resources’, in Pratt, M.G., Schultz, M., Ashforth, B.E., and Ravasi, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity: 123–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wenzel, M., Cornelissen, J., Koch, J., Hartmann, M. and Rauch, M. (2020), ‘(Un)mind the gap: how organizational actors cope with an identity-strategy misalignment’, Strategic Organization, 18/1: 212–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whetten, D. A. (2006), ‘Albert and Whetten revisited: strengthening the concept of organizational identity’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15/3: 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whetten, D. A. and Godfrey, P. (eds) (1998), Identity in Organizations: Developing Theory through Conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. and Mackey, A. (2002), ‘A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation’, Business and Society, 41/4: 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ybema, S. (2010), ‘Talk of change: temporal contrasts and collective identities’, Organization Studies, 31/4: 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ybema, S., Keenoy, T., Oswick, C., Beverungen, A., Ellis, N. and Sabelis, I. (2009), ‘Articulating identities’, Human Relations, 62/3: 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. and Genc, M. (2003), ‘Identity versus culture in mergers of equals’, European Management Journal, 21/2: 185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Balogun, J. (2006), ‘Managing change: steering a course between intended strategies and unanticipated outcomes’, Long Range Planning, 39/1: 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G.(2005), ‘From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking’, Organization Studies, 26/11: 1573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Bartunek, J. M. and Do, B. (2015), ‘Senior managers’ sensemaking and responses to strategic change’, Organization Science, 26/4: 960–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bean, C. J. and Hamilton, F. E. (2006), ‘Leader framing and follower sensemaking: response to downsizing in the brave new workplace’, Human Relations, 59/3: 321–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechky, B. A. (2003), ‘Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of knowledge on a production floor’, Organization Science, 14: 312–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogner, W. C. and Barr, P. S. (2000), ‘Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: a cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition’, Organization Science, 11/2: 212–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boje, D. M. (1991), ‘The storytelling organization: a study of story performance in an office-supply firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36/1: 106–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Cepa, K. and Schildt, H. (2023), ‘Data-induced rationality and unitary spaces in interfirm collaboration’, Organization Science, 34/1: 129–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. (2020), ‘Whence paradox? Framing away the potential challenges of doing well by doing good in social enterprise organizations’, Organization Studies, 41/8: 1147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, K. G. and Gioia, D. A. (2004), ‘Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49/2: 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P. (2012), ‘Sensemaking under pressure: the influence of professional roles and social accountability on the creation of sense’, Organization Science, 23: 118–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P. and Clarke, J. S. (2010), ‘Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: inductive reasoning, and the creation and justification of new ventures’, Academy of Management Review, 35/4: 539–57.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘The contraction of meaning: the combined effect of communication, emotions and materiality on sensemaking in the Stockwell shooting’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/5: 699–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., Akemu, O., Jonkman, J. G. and Werner, M. D. (2021), ‘Building character: the formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise’, Journal of Management Studies, 58/5: 1294–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R. L. and Weick, K. E. (1984), ‘Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems’, Academy of Management Review, 9/2: 284–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, K. and Kumar, R. (2010), ‘Interpartner sensemaking in strategic alliances: managing cultural differences and internal tensions’, Management Decision, 48/1: 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998), ‘What is agency?’, American Journal of Sociology, 103/4: 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, C. and Langley, A. (2012), ‘Strategy as practice and the narrative turn’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1171–96.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiss, P. C. and Zajac, E. J. (2006), ‘The symbolic management of strategic change: sensegiving via framing and decoupling’, Academy of Management Journal, 49/6: 1173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzin, M., Islam, G. and Suddaby, R. (2020), ‘Spirituality and entrepreneurship: the role of magical thinking in future-oriented sensemaking’, Organization Studies, 41/1: 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garud, R., Lant, T. K. and Schildt, H. A. (2019), ‘Generative imitation, strategic distancing and optimal distinctiveness during the growth, decline and stabilization of Silicon Alley’, Innovation, 21/1: 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garud, R., Schildt, H. A. and Lant, T. K. (2014), ‘Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy’, Organization Science, 25/5: 1479–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A. and Chittipeddi, K. (1991), ‘Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation’, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 433–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A. and Mehra, A. (1996), ‘Book review: sensemaking in organizations’, Academy of Management Review, 21/4: 1226–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A. and Thomas, J. B. (1996), ‘Identity, image, and issue interpretation: sensemaking during strategic change in academia’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41/3: 370–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M. and Chittipeddi, K. (1994), ‘Symbolism and strategic change in academia: the dynamics of sensemaking and influence’, Organization Science, 5: 363–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, A. M. and Watkiss, L. (2020), ‘Of organizing and sensemaking: from action to meaning and back again in a half‐century of Weick’s theorizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 57/7: 1331–54.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. and Levin, D. Z. (1999), ‘Umbrella advocates versus validity police: a life-cycle model’, Organization Science, 10/2: 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalonen, K., Schildt, H. and Vaara, E. (2018), ‘Strategic concepts as micro‐level tools in strategic sensemaking’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/10: 2794–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2003), Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2008), ‘Shaping strategy as a structuration process’, Academy of Management Journal, 51/4: 621–50.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. A. and Lê, J. K. (2017), ‘We have to do this and that? You must be joking: constructing and responding to paradox through humor’, Organization Studies, 38/3–4: 433–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2008), The role of strategy meetings in the social practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 29/11: 1391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2003), ‘Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics’, American Economic Review, 93/5: 1449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanitz, R., Huy, Q. N., Backmann, J. and Hoegl, M. (2022), ‘No change is an island: how interferences between change initiatives evoke inconsistencies that undermine implementation’, Academy of Management Journal, 65/2: 683–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011a), ‘Research in cognition and strategy: reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future’, Journal of Management Studies, 48: 665–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011b), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy-making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. and Orlikowski, W. (2013), ‘Temporal work in strategy making’, Organization Science, 24/4: 965–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004), Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. (2021), ‘Frame restructuration: the making of an alternative business incubator amid Detroit’s crisis’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 66/3: 753–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudesia, R. S. (2021), ‘Emergent strategy from spontaneous anger: crowd dynamics in the first 48 hours of the Ferguson shooting’, Organization Science, 32/5: 1210–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küpers, W., Mantere, S. and Statler, M. (2013), ‘Strategy as storytelling: a phenomenological exploration of embodied narrative practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 22/1: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, W., Clarke, I. and Wodak, R. (2014), ‘Micro‐level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, P. M., Tsedal, B. and Neeley, E. G. (2012), ‘How managers use multiple media: discrepant events, power, and timing in redundant communication’, Organization Science 23/1: 98–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, F. and Maitlis, S. (2014), ‘Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: a study of strategic conversations in top team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 202–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitlis, S. (2005), ‘The social processes of organizational sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 48: 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitlis, S. and Christianson, M. (2014), ‘Sensemaking in organizations: taking stock and moving forward’, Academy of Management Annals, 8/1: 57–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitlis, S. and Lawrence, T. (2007), ‘Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 50: 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitlis, S. and Sonenshein, S. (2010), ‘Sensemaking in crisis and change: inspiration and insights from Weick (1988)’, Journal of Management Studies, 47: 551–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitlis, S., Vogus, T. J. and Lawrence, T. B. (2013), ‘Sensemaking and emotion in organizations’, Organizational Psychology Review, 3/3: 222–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S., Schildt, H. A. and Sillince, J. A. (2012), ‘Reversal of strategic change’, Academy of Management Journal, 55/1: 172–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, D. (2010), ‘Strategy-as-power: ambiguity, contradiction and the exercise of power in a UK building society’, Organization, 17: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., Frost, P. and Pondy, L. R. (1983), ‘Organizational symbolism’, in Pondy, L. R. Frost, P., Morgan, G., and Dandridge, T. (eds), Organizational Symbolism: 3–35. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, F., Whittle, A., Gilchrist, A. and Lenney, P. (2013), ‘Politics and strategy practice: ethnomethodologically-informed discourse analysis perspective’, Business History, 55/7: 1168–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nigam, A. and Ocasio, W. (2010), ‘Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: an inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative’, Organization Science, 21/4: 823–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H. and Baden-Fuller, C. (1989), ‘Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers’, Journal of Management Studies, 26: 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H. and Baden-Fuller, C. (2011), ‘Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers revisited’, Journal of Management Studies, 48: 646–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. G. (2000), ‘The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: managing identification among Amway distributors’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 456–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, A. J. (2002), ‘The changing power of “explanations”: directors, academics and their sensemaking from 1989 to 2000’, Journal of Management Studies, 39: 907–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, R. and Worline, M. C. (2008), ‘Enabling courageous collective action: conversations from United Airlines flight 93’, Organization Science, 19: 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasche, A. and Chia, R. (2009), ‘Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective’, Organization Studies, 30/7: 713–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravasi, D. and Schultz, M. (2006), ‘Responding to organizational identity threats: exploring the role of organizational culture’, Academy of Management Journal, 49/3: 433–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1984), Time and Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2010), ‘Studying strategizing through narratives of practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 258–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rouleau, L. and Balogun, J. (2011), ‘Middle managers, strategic sensemaking and discursive competence’, Journal of Management Studies, 48/5: 953–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schildt, H., Mantere, S. and Cornelissen, J. (2020), ‘Power in sensemaking processes’, Organization Studies, 41/2: 241–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M. and Hernes, T. (2013), ‘A temporal perspective on organizational identity’, Organization Science, 24/1: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. and Werle, F. (2018), ‘Inter‐organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta‐problems: requisite variety and dynamics of participation’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 830–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snook, S. A. (2000), Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shoot Down of U.S Black Hawks over Northern Iraq. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sonenshein, S. (2009), ‘Emergence of ethical issues during strategic change implementation’, Organization Science, 20/1: 223–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2017), ‘Agreeing on what? Creating joint accounts of strategic change’, Organization Science, 28/1: 152–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starbuck, W. and Milliken, F. (1988), ‘Executive perceptual filters: what they notice and how they make sense’, in Hambrick, D. (ed.), The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers: 35–65. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Steigenberger, N. and Lübcke, T. (2022), ‘Space and sensemaking in high-reliability task contexts: insights from a maritime mass rescue exercise’, Organization Studies, 43/5: 699–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigliani, I. and Ravasi, D. (2012), ‘Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1232–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (2002), ‘Coherence in Thought and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M. and Gioia, D. A. (1993), ‘Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes’, Academy of Management Journal, 36/2: 239–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaara, E. and Whittle, A. (2022), ‘Common sense, new sense or non‐sense? A critical discursive perspective on power in collective sensemaking’, Journal of Management Studies, 59/3: 755–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, Francisco J. (1979), Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Vuori, T. and Virtaharju, J. (2012). ‘On the role of emotional arousal in sensegiving’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25/1: 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1988), ‘Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations’, Journal of Management Studies, 25: 305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1993), ‘The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 628–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2022), ‘Arrested sensemaking: typified suppositions sink the El Faro’, Organization Theory, 3(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. and Roberts, K. H. (1993), ‘Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 357–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. and Obstfeld, D. (2005), ‘Organizing and the process of sensemaking’, Organization Science, 16: 409–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiser, A. K. (2021), ‘The role of substantive actions in sensemaking during strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 58/3: 815–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, G. and Cooper, W. H. (2011), ‘Ecological sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 54: 889–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2005), ‘From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking’, Organization Studies, 26/11: 1573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J. and Pek, S. (2016), ‘Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: the role of culture in the integration of routines’, Organization Science, 27/3: 573–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanche, C. and Feldman, M. (2021), ‘Bodies and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M., Pentland, B., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 343–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canales, R. (2011), ‘Rule bending, sociological citizenship, and organizational contestation in microfinance’, Regulation and Governance, 5/1: 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canales, R. (2014), ‘Weaving straw into gold: managing organizational tensions between standardization and flexibility in microfinance’, Organization Science, 25/1: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M. and Winter, S. G. (1996), ‘Contemporary issues in research on routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5/3: 653–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
d’Adderio, L. (2008), ‘The performativity of routines: theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics’, Research Policy, 37/5: 769–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Adderio, L. (2011), ‘Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7/S2: 197–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Adderio, L. (2014), ‘The replication dilemma unravelled: how organizations balance multiple goals in routine transfer’, Organization Science, 25/5: 1325–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Adderio, L. (2021), ‘Materiality and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M., Pentland, B., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 85–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Adderio, L. and Pollock, N. (2020), ‘Making routines the same: crafting similarity and singularity in routines transfer’, Research Policy, 49/8: 104029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. B. and Lewis, A. E. (2019), ‘Race and discipline at a racially mixed high school: status, capital, and the practice of organizational routines’, Urban Education, 54/6: 831–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionysiou, D. and Tsoukas, H. (2013), ‘Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: a symbolic interactionist perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 38/2: 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittrich, K. and Seidl, D. (2014), ‘Resourcing Routine Change: How Resources Contribute to Routine Dynamics’, paper presented at the sixth International symposium on process organization studies, Rhodes, 20 June.Google Scholar
Elias, N. (1978), What Is Sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. (1997), ‘Manifesto for a relational sociology’, American Journal of Sociology, 103/2: 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farjoun, M. (2010), ‘Beyond dualism: stability and change as a duality’, Academy of Management Review, 35/2: 202–25.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2000), ‘Organizational routines as a source of continuous change’, Organization Science, 11/6: 611–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2003), ‘A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12/4: 727–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2004), ‘Resources in emerging structures and processes of change’, Organization Science, 15/3: 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2016), ‘Routines as process: past, present, and future’, in Howard-Grenville, J. A., Rerup, C., Langley, A., and Tsoukas, H. (eds), Organizational Routines: A Process Perspective. Perspectives on Process Organization Studies: 23–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2021), ‘Practice theory and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M., Pentland, B., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 21–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011), ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’, Organization Science, 22/5: 1240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48/1: 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2022), ‘Routine dynamics: toward a critical conversation’, Strategic Organization, 20/4: 846–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Quick, K. S. (2009), ‘Generating resources and energizing frameworks through inclusive public management’, International Public Management Journal, 12/2: 137–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Worline, M. W. (2012), ‘Resources, resourcing, and ampliative cycles in organizations’, in Cameron, K., and Spreitzer, G. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship: 629–41. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, M., Pentland, B., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C. and Seidl, D. (2021), ‘What is routine dynamics?’, in Feldman, M., Pentland, B., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, D., Danner-Schröder, A. and Kremser, W. (2021), ‘Getting ahead of time – performing temporal boundaries to coordinate routines under temporal uncertainty’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 66/1: 220–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, S. (2006), Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Goh, K. T. and Pentland, B. T. (2019), ‘From actions to paths to patterning: toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines’, Academy of Management Journal, 62/6: 1901–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (2010), ‘Introduction: what is strategy as practice?’, in Golshorski, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grand, S. (2012), ‘Routines, Strategies and Management: Engaging for Recurrent Creation “at the edge”’, Habilitation Manuscript. University of St. Gallen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Grand, S. (2021), ‘Routine dynamics and management practice’, in Feldman, M., Pentland, B., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 397–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, K. P., Kiel, G. C. and Nicholson, G. (2010), ‘How boards strategise: a strategy as practice view’, Long Range Planning, 43/1: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005), ‘The persistence of flexible organizational routines: the role of agency and organizational context’, Organization Science, 16/6: 618–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2007), ‘Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: issue selling as resourcing’, Organization Science, 18/4: 560–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2003), ‘Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2010), ‘An activity-theory approach to strategy as practice’, in Golshorski, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 127–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2008), ‘The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 29/11: 1391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, P. (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. and Feldman, M. S. (2012), ‘Toward a theory of coordinating: creating coordinating mechanisms in practice’, Organization Science, 23/4: 907–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joas, H. (1996), The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (2007), ‘“The stone that was cast out shall become the cornerstone”: the bodily aesthetics of human meaning’, Journal of Visual Art Practice, 6/2: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremser, W. and Blagoev, B. (2021), ‘The dynamics of prioritizing: how actors temporally pattern complex role–routine ecologies’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 66/2: 339–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1986), ‘The powers of association’, in Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?: 264–80. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lave, J. (1988), Cognition in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinthal, D. A. and Rerup, C. (2006), ‘Crossing an apparent chasm: bridging mindful and less mindful perspectives on organizational learning’, Organization Science, 17/4: 502–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (2007), After Virtue, 3rd edn. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mantere, S. (2010), ‘A Wittgensteinian perspective on strategizing’, in Golshorski, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 155–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968), Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (2014), ‘The mutual constitution of persons and organizations: an ontological perspective on organizational change’, Organization Science, 25/4: 1082–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2012), Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (eds) (2003), Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002), ‘Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing’, Organization Science, 13/3: 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007), ‘Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work’, Organization Studies, 28/9: 1435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. and Scott, S. V. (2008), ‘Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization’, Academy of Management Annals, 2/1: 433–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2008), ‘Designing routines: on the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action’, Information and Organization, 18/4: 235–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Reuter, H. H. (1994), ‘Organizational routines as grammars of action’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39/3: 484–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Haerem, T. and Hillison, D. (2011), ‘The (n)ever changing world: stability and change in organizational routines’, Organization Science, 22/6: 1369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Feldman, M. S., Lui, P. and Becker, M. (2012), ‘Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model’, Journal of Management Studies, 49/8: 1484–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Mahringer, C., Dittrich, K., Feldman, M. S. and Ryan Wolf, J. (2020), ‘Process multiplicity and process dynamics: weaving the space of possible paths’, Organization Theory, https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720963138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Yoo, Y., Recker, , J. and Kim, I. (2021), ‘From lock-in to transformation: a path-centric theory of emerging technology and organizing’, Organization Science, 33/1:194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rerup, C. and Feldman, M. S. (2011), ‘Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning’, Academy of Management Journal, 54/3: 577–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C. (2003), ‘The role of micro-strategies in the engineering of firm evolution’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C. (2009), ‘Capabilities unveiled: the role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes’, Organization Science, 20/2: 384–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C. (2021), ‘Dynamic capabilities and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M., Pentland, B., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 460–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2011), ‘Beyond collective entities: multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities’, Journal of Management, 37/2: 468–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2018), ‘Routine regulation: balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 63/1: 170–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2012), ‘Primer on practice’, in Higgs, J., Barnett, R., Billett, S., Hutchings, M., and Trede, F. (eds), Practice-Based Education: 13–26. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D., Grossmann-Hensel, B. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2021), ‘Strategy as practice and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M., Pentland, B., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 481–500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sele, K. (2021), ‘Actor-network theory and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M., Pentland, B., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 73–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevón, G. (1996), ‘Organizational imitation in identity transformation’, in Czarniawska, B., and Sevón, G. (eds), Translating Organizational Change: 49–68. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, S. (2014), ‘How organizations foster the creative use of resources’, Academy of Management Journal, 57/3: 814–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stene, E. (1940), ‘An approach to a science of administration’, American Political Science Review, 34/6: 1124–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, L. (2007), Human–Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002), ‘On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change’, Organization Science, 13/5: 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. (2012), ‘A balancing act: how organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change’, Organization Science, 23/1: 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (1996), ‘Strategy as practice’, Long Range Planning, 29/5: 731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2010), ‘Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 109–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2001[1951]), Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zbaracki, M. J. and Bergen, M. (2010), ‘When truces collapse: a longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines’, Organization Science, 21/5: 955–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aggerholm, H. K., Asmuß, B. and Thomsen, C. (2012), ‘The role of recontextualization in the multivocal, ambiguous process of strategizing’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 21/4: 413–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. (2007), Identity’s Strategy: Rhetorical Selves in Conversion. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Asmuß, B. and Oshima, S. (2018), ‘Strategy making as a communicative practice: the multimodal accomplishment of strategy roles’, M@n@gement, 21/2: 884–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2005), ‘From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking’, Organization Studies, 26/11: 1573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basque, J., Bencherki, N. and Kuhn, T. (eds) (2022), The Routledge Handbook of the Communicative Constitution of Organization. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, N. (2021), ‘Using video methods to uncover the relational, interactional and practical constitution of space’, in Grosjean, S., and Matte, F. (eds), Organizational Video-Ethnography Revisited: 99–116. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, N. and Elmholdt, K. T. (2022), ‘The organization’s synaptic mode of existence: how a hospital merger is many things at once’, Organization, 29/4: 521–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, N., Sergi, V., Cooren, F. and Vásquez, C. (2021), ‘How strategy comes to matter: strategizing as the communicative materialization of matters of concern’, Strategic Organization, 19/4: 608–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boje, D. M. (2008). Storytelling Organizations. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummans, B., Cooren, F. and Chaput, M. (2009), ‘Discourse, communication, and organizational ontology’, in Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Business Discourse: 53–65. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, K. (1945), A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1986), ‘Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, in Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?: 196–223. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Chaput, M., Brummans, B. and Cooren, F. (2011), ‘The role of organizational identification in the communicative constitution of an organization: a study of consubstantialization in a young political party’, Management Communication Quarterly, 25/2: 252–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., Kwon, W. and Wodak, R. (2012), ‘A context-sensitive approach to analysing talk in strategy meetings’, British Journal of Management, 23/4: 455–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F. (2000), The Organizing Property of Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F. (2006), ‘The organizational world as a plenum of agencies’, in Cooren, F., Taylor, J. R., and Van Every, E. J. (eds), Communication as Organizing: Practical Approaches to Research into the Dynamic of Text and Conversation: 81–100. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cooren, F. (2010), Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F. (2012), ‘Communication theory at the center: ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality’, Journal of Communication, 62/1: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F. (2015), ‘In medias res: communication, existence, and materiality’, Communication Research and Practice, 1/4: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F. (2017), ‘Acting for, with, and through: a relational perspective on agency in MSF’s organizing’, in Brummans, B. H. J. M. (ed.), The Agency of Organizing: Perspectives and Case Studies: 142–69. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooren, F. (2018). ‘Materializing communication: making the case for a relational ontology’, Journal of Communication, 68/2: 278–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F., Taylor, J. R. and Van Every, E. J. (eds) (2006), Communication as Organizing: Practical Approaches to Research into the Dynamic of Text and Conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cooren, F., Matte, F., Taylor, J. R. and Vásquez, C. (2007), ‘A humanitarian organization in action: organizational discourse as an immutable mobile’, Discourse and Communication, 1/2: 153–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F., Kuhn, T. R., Cornelissen, J. and Clark, T. (2011), ‘Communication organizing and organization: an overview and introduction to the special issue’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Fa, S. and Kärreman, D. (2022), ‘Uncritical constitution: CCO, critique and neoliberal capitalism’, in Basque, J., Bencherki, N., and Kuhn, T. (eds), Routledge Handbook of the Communicative Constitution of Organization: 165–79. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Dompierre, G., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2011), ‘Escalating indecision: between reification and strategic ambiguity’, Organization Science, 22/1: 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, C. and Langley, A. (2011), ‘Strategy as practice and the narrative turn’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (eds) (2010), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C., Palmer, I. and Phillips, N. (2000), ‘Discourse as a strategic resource’, Human Relations, 53/9: 1227–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoon, C. (2007), ‘Committees as strategic practice: the role of strategic conversation in a public administration’, Human Relations, 60/6: 921–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2003), ‘Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2008), ‘Strategy as practice’, in Barry, D., and Hansen, H. (eds), The Sage Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization: 364–78. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2008), ‘The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 29/11: 1391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Sillince, J. and Shaw, D. (2010), ‘Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple interests’, Human Relations, 63/2: 219–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1972), ‘Side sequences’, in Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction: 294–338. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004), ‘Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction’, in Lerner, G. H. (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation: 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (2001), The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T., Ashcraft, K. L. and Cooren, F. (2017), The Work of Communication: Relational Perspectives on Working and Organizing in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, W., Clarke, I. and Wodak, R. (2009), ‘Organizational decision-making, discourse, and power: integrating across contexts and scales’, Discourse and Communication, 3/3: 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1996), ‘On interobjectivity’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3/4: 228–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2004), ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, 30/2: 225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2008), What Is the Style of Matters of Concern? Assen, Netherlands: Royal Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Liu, F. (2013), ‘Emotion and strategizing: exploring emotional dynamics and senior team strategizing in meetings’, unpublished PhD dissertation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Liu, F. and Maitlis, S. (2014), ‘Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: a study of strategic conversations in top team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 202–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. A. (1985), ‘Of strategies, deliberate and emergent’, Strategic Management Journal, 6/3: 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathues, E. and van Vuuren, M. (2022), ‘Acting in the name of others: how to unpack ventriloquations’, in Basque, J., Bencherki, N., and Kuhn, T. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of the Communicative Constitution of Organization: 213–25. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nathues, E., van Vuuren, M. and Cooren, F. (2021), ‘Speaking about vision, talking in the name of so much more: a methodological framework for ventriloquial analyses in organization studies’, Organization Studies, 42/9: 1457–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2009), ‘Zooming in and out: studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections’, Organization Studies, 30/12: 1391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, S. (2001), Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pink, S. (2006), The Future of Visual Anthropology: Engaging the Senses. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L. L. and Nicotera, A. M. (2009), Building Theories of Organization: The Constitutive Role of Communication. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2003), ‘Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robichaud, R. (2006), ‘Steps toward a relational view of agency’, in Cooren, F., Taylor, J. R., and Van Every, E. J. (eds), Communication as Organizing: Practical Approaches to Research into the Dynamic of Text and Conversation: 101–14. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rouse, J. (2007), ‘Practice philosophy’, in Turner, S., and Risjord, M. (eds), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol. XV, Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology: 630–81. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003), ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2004), ‘Managerial elites making rhetorical and linguistic “moves” for a moving (emotional) display’, Human Relations, 57/9: 1103–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2005), ‘Strategic practice, “discourse” and the everyday interactional constitution of “power effects”’, Organization, 12/6: 803–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2010), Researching everyday practice: the ethnomethodological contribution’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 230–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, H. B. (1989), The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillince, J. and Mueller, F. (2007), ‘Switching strategic perspective: the reframing of accounts of responsibility’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillince, J., Jarzabkowski, P. and Shaw, D. (2012), ‘Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity’, Organization Science, 23/3: 630–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, A. P. (2022), ‘Strategic management and CCO’, in Basque, J., Bencherki, N., and Kuhn, T. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of the Communicative Constitution of Organization: 339–53. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spee, A. P., and Jarzabkowski, P. (2011), ‘Strategic planning as communicative process’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, A. P., and Jarzabkowski, P. (2017), ‘Agreeing on what? Creating joint accounts of strategic change’, Organization Science, 28/1: 152–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stensaker, I. and Falkenberg, J. (2007), ‘Making sense of different responses to corporate change’, Human Relations, 60/1: 137–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stronz, M. (2005), ‘Strategic learning in the context of strategy implementation: a case study of implementers in action’, unpublished PhD dissertation. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Suominen, K. and Mantere, S. (2010), ‘Consuming strategy: the art and practice of managers’ everyday strategy usage’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Lampel, J. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXVII, The Globalization of Strategy Research: 211–45. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. and van Every, E. J. (2000), The Emergent Organization: Communication as Its Site and Surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. and van Every, E. J. (2011), The Situated Organization: Case Studies in the Pragmatics of Communication Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ten Have, P. (1999), Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tracy, K. and Dimock, A. (2004), ‘Meetings: discursive sites for building and fragmenting community’, in Kalbfleisch, P. J. (ed.), Communication Yearbook 28: 127–65. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vaara, E. and Tienari, J. (2011), ‘On the narrative construction of multinational corporations: an antenarrative analysis of legitimation and resistance in a cross-border merger’, Organization Science, 22/2: 370–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Kleymann, B. and Seristö, H. (2004), ‘Strategies as discursive constructions: the case of airline alliances’, Journal of Management Studies, 41/1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Sorsa, V. and Pälli, P. (2010), ‘On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization’, Organization, 17/6: 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) (1997), Discourse Studies: A Multidiscilpinary Introduction, vol. I, Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, C. (2013), ‘Spacing organization (or how to be here and there at the same time)’, in Robichaud, D., and Cooren, F. (eds), Organization and Organizing: Materiality, Agency and Discourse: 127–49. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vásquez, C., Brummans, B. H. J. M. and Groleau, C. (2012), ‘Notes from the field on organizational shadowing as framing’, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 7/2: 144–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, C., Sergi, V. and Cordelier, B. (2013), ‘From being branded to doing branding: studying representation practices from a communication-centered approach’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29/2: 125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, C., Bencherki, N., Cooren, F. and Sergi, V. (2018), ‘From “matters of concern” to “matters of authority”: studying the performativity of strategy from a communicative constitution of organization (CCO) approach’. Long Range Planning, 51/3: 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veltrop, D. B., Bezemer, B. J., Nicholson, G. and Pugliese, A. (2021), ‘Too unsafe to monitor? How board-CEO cognitive conflict and chair leadership shape outside director monitoring’, Academy of management Journal, 64/1: 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M. and Koch, J. (2018), ‘Strategy as staged performance: a critical discursive perspective on keynote speeches as a genre of strategic communication’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 639–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M., Krämer, H., Koch, J. and Reckwitz, A. (2020), Future and organization studies: on the rediscovery of a problematic temporal category in organizations. Organization Studies, 41/10: 1441–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2003), ‘The work of strategizing and organizing: for a practice perspective’, Strategic Organization, 1/1: 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A., Housley, W., Gilchrist, A., Lenney, P. and Mueller, F. (2014), ‘Power, politics, and organizational communication: an ethnomethodological perspective’, in Cooren, F., Vaara, E., Langley, A., and Tsoukas, H. (eds), Language and Communication at Work: Discourse, Narrativity, and Organizing: 71–94. Oxford; Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., Kwon, W. and Clarke, I. (2011), ‘“Getting people on board”: discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings’, Discourse and Society, 22/5: 592–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Adner, R. and Kapoor, R. (2010), ‘Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations’, Strategic Management Journal, 31/3: 306–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Blom, M. (2022), ‘The hegemonic ambiguity of big concepts in organization studies’, Human Relations, 75/1: 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, M. B. and Rousseau, D. M. (eds) (2001), The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Awad, M. H. (2023), ‘Emplacing category dynamics: houselessness and the emergence of transitional micro-housing villages’, Strategic Organization, 21/1: 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberá-Tomás, D., Castelló, I., de Bakker, F. G. A. and Zietsma, C. (2019), ‘Energizing through visuals: how social entrepreneurs use emotion-symbolic work for social change’, Academy of Management Journal, 62/6: 1789–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1986), ‘Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy’, Management Science, 32/10: 1231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battilana, J. and d’Aunno, T. A. (2009), ‘Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency’, in Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., and Leca, B. (eds), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations: 31–58. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beinhocker, E. D. and Kaplan, S. (2002), ‘Tired of strategic planning?’, McKinsey Quarterly, 2: 48–57.Google Scholar
Beyes, T. and Holt, R. (2020), ‘The topographical imagination: space and organization theory’, Organization Theory, 1/2, https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720913880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. and Pinch, T. (2012), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Anniversary edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D. (2015), ‘Identities and identity work in organizations’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 17/1: 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D. (2017), ‘Identity work and organizational identification’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 19/3: 296–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D. (2022), ‘Identities in and around organizations: towards an identity work perspective’, Human Relations, 75/7: 1205–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. and Law, J. (1997), ‘After the individual in society: lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society’, The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 22/2: 165–82.Google Scholar
Carlile, P. R. (2002), ‘A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development’, Organization Science, 13/4: 442–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlile, P. R. (2004), ‘Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries’, Organization Science, 15/5: 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carton, G. (2020), ‘How assemblages change when theories become performative: the case of the Blue Ocean Strategy’, Organization Studies, 41/10: 1417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chudzikowski, K. and Mayrhofer, W. (2011), ‘In search of the blue flower? Grand social theories and career research: the case of Bourdieu’s theory of practice’, Human Relations, 64/1: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, L. and Tracey, P. (2020), ‘Making change from behind a mask: how organizations challenge guarded institutions by sparking grassroots activism’, Academy of Management Journal, 63/4: 965–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Certeau, M. (2011), The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Rendall, S., 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Denrell, J., Fang, C. and Winter, S. G. (2003), ‘The economics of strategic opportunity’, Strategic Management Journal, 24/10: 977–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M. and Bednar, J. (2010), ‘Pathways for positive identity construction at work: four types of positive identity and the building of social resources’, Academy of Management Review, 35/2: 265–93.Google Scholar
Etter, M., Ravasi, D. and Colleoni, E. (2019), ‘Social media and the formation of organizational reputation’, Academy of Management Review, 44/1: 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2004), ‘Resources in emerging structures and processes of change’, Organization Science, 15/3: 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. and Worline, M. (2016), ‘The practicality of practice theory’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15/2: 304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehman, J., Treviño, L. K. and Garud, R. (2013), ‘Values work: a process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices’, Academy of Management Journal, 56/1: 84–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L. and Krikorian, F. (2018), ‘How do things become strategic? “Strategifying” corporate social responsibility’, Strategic Organization, 16/3: 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Arcos, C., Joubert, A. M., Scaraboto, D., Guesalaga, R. and Sandberg, J. (2021), ‘“How do I carry all this now?” Understanding consumer resistance to sustainability interventions’, Journal of Marketing, 85/3: 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandey, A. A. (2003), ‘When “the show must go on”: surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery’, Academy of Management Journal, 46/1: 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. (2013), ‘Rocking the boat but keeping it steady: the role of emotion regulation in employee voice’, Academy of Management Journal, 56/6: 1703–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001), ‘The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment’, Psychological Review, 108/4: 814–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2007), ‘The new synthesis in moral psychology’, Science, 316/5827: 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harman, G. (2010), ‘Technology, objects and things in Heidegger’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34/1: 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1953), Being and Time. Tubingen: Max Niemar Verlag.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (1979), ‘Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure’, American Journal of Sociology, 85/3: 551–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holstein, J. and Rantakari, A. (2023), ‘Space and the dynamic between openness and closure: open strategizing in the TV series Borgen’, Organization Studies, 44/1: 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarra, H. (2004), Working Identity: Unconventional Strategies for Reinventing Your Career. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2008), ‘Shaping strategy as a structuration process’, Academy of Management Journal, 51/4: 621–50.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Kaplan, S. (2015), ‘Strategy tools-in-use: a framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice’, Strategic Management Journal, 36/4: 537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. and Spee, P. (2015), ‘Constructing spaces for strategic work: a multimodal perspective’, British Journal of Management, 26/S1: S26–S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2/3, https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211029665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kannan-Narasimhan, R. and Lawrence, B. S. (2018), ‘How innovators reframe resources in the strategy-making process to gain innovation adoption’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 720–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karadag, R. and Poppo, L. (2023), ‘Strategic resource decay’, Strategic Management Journal, 44/6: 1534–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W. C. (2005), Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. and Clegg, S. (2011), ‘Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030’, Strategic Organization, 9/2: 136–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, P.-M. and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. and Phillips, N. (2019), Constructing Organizational Life: How Social-Symbolic Work Shapes Selves, Organizations, and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. and Suddaby, R. (2006), ‘Institutions and institutional work’, in Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Nord, W. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies: 215–54. 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R. and Leca, B. (2011), ‘Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 20/1: 52–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Schlindwein, E., Jalan, R. and Heaphy, E. D. (2023), ‘Organizational body work: efforts to shape human bodies in organizations’, Academy of Management Annals, 17/1: 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, M. R. and Tagney, J. P. (2003), ‘The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences’, in Leary, M. R., and Tagney, J. P. (eds), Handbook of Self and Identity: 1–18. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Liu, F. and Maitlis, S. (2014), ‘Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: a study of strategic conversations in top team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 202–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livne-Tarandach, R. and Jazaieri, H. (2021), ‘Swift sense of community: resourcing artifacts for rapid community emergence in a temporary organization’, Academy of Management Journal, 64/41127–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Whittington, R. (2021), ‘Becoming a strategist: the roles of strategy discourse and ontological security in managerial identity work’, Strategic Organization, 19/4: 553–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. and van der Heyden, L. (1999), ‘Organigraphs: drawing how companies really work’, Harvard Business Review, 77/5: 87–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010), Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pandza, K., Whittington, R. and Hautz, J. (2022), ‘In praise of fractionated trading zones: respectful partnerships in management innovation’, Strategic Management Review, 3/1: 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N. and Lawrence, T. B. (2012), ‘The turn to work in organization and management theory: some implications for strategic organization’, Strategic Organization, 10/3: 223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. and Hardy, C. (2004), ‘Discourse and institutions’, Academy of Management Review, 29/4: 635–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990), ‘The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68/3: 79–91.Google Scholar
Ravasi, D., Rindova, V., Etter, M. and Cornelissen, J. (2018), The formation of organizational reputation’, Academy of Management Annals, 12/2: 574–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. and Cloutier, C. (2022), ‘It’s strategy. But is it practice? Desperately seeking social practice in strategy-as-practice research. Strategic Organization, 20/4: 722–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, I., Kotlar, J., Ravasi, D. and Vaara, E. (2020), ‘Dealing with revered past: historical identity statements and strategic change in Japanese family firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 41/3: 590–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and Savigny, E. von. (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shepherd, D. A., Seyb, S. and George, G. (2023), ‘Grounding business models: cognition, boundary objects, and business-model change’, Academy of Management Review, 48/1: 100–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. A. and Anderson, L. (1987), ‘Identity work among the homeless: the verbal construction and avowal of personal identities’, American Journal of Sociology, 92/6: 1336–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, S. (2014), ‘How organizations foster the creative use of resources’, Academy of Management Journal, 57/3: 814–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, E. Y. (2021), ‘Protect to damage? Institutional work, unintended consequences and institutional dynamics’, Organization Studies, 42/3: 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, A. P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2009), ‘Strategy tools as boundary objects’, Strategic Organization, 7/2: 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989), ‘Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39’, Social Studies of Science, 19/3: 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, R. I. and Rafaeli, A. (1988), ‘Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: the case of convenience stores’, Academy of Management Journal, 31/3: 461–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, S. and Arthur, M. B. (2010), ‘New directions for boundaryless careers: agency and interdependence in a changing world’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31/5: 629–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (2002), ‘Modern social imaginaries’, Public Culture, 14/1: 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, P. and Phillips, N. (2016), ‘Managing the consequences of organizational stigmatization: identity work in a social enterprise’, Academy of Management Journal, 59/3: 740–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Sorsa, V. and Pälli, P. (2010), ‘On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization’, Organization, 17/6: 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werle, F. and Seidl, D. (2015), ‘The layered materiality of strategizing: epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics’, British Journal of Management, 26: S67–S89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. (1984), ‘A resource‐based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5/2: 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2003), ‘The work of strategizing and organizing: for a practice perspective’, Strategic Organization, 1/1: 117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2019), Opening Strategy: Professional Strategists and Practice Change, 1960 to Today, 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Mayer, M., Mounoud, E., Nahapiet, J., and Rouleau, L. (2003), ‘Taking strategy seriously: responsibility and reform for an important social practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12/4: 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Molloy, E., Mayer, M. and Smith, A. (2006), ‘Practices of strategising/organising: broadening strategy work and skills’, Long Range Planning, 39/6: 615–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, I. (2018), ‘Identity work and emotions: a review’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 20/1: 120–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zietsma, C. and Lawrence, T. B. (2010), ‘Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55/2: 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuzul, T. W. (2019), ‘“Matter battles”: cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities’, Academy of Management Journal, 62/3: 739–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Abell, P., Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2008), ‘Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 29/6: 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, S. A. and Barney, J. (2008), ‘Opportunities, organizations, and entrepreneurship’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2/4: 265–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosini, V. (2003), Tacit and Ambiguous Resources as Sources of Competitive Advantage. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C. and Burton-Taylor, S. B. (2007), ‘Inter-team coordination activities as a source of customer satisfaction’, Human Relations, 60/1: 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. (1993), ‘Strategic assets and organizational rent’, Strategic Management Journal, 14/1: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1986a), ‘Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy’, Management Science, 32/10: 1231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1986b), ‘Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?’, Academy of Management Review, 11/3: 656–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17/1: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (2001), ‘Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view’, Journal of Management, 27/6: 643–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. and Felin, T. (2013), ‘What are microfoundations?’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27/2: 138–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr, D. J., and Wright, M. (2021), ‘Resource-based theory and the value creation framework’, Journal of Management, 47(7): 1936–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (2005), ‘Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14/5: 775–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgelman, R. A. (1983), ‘A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28/2: 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Deken, F., Berends, H., Gemser, G. and Lauche, K. (2018), ’Strategizing and the initiation of interorganizational collaboration through prospective resourcing’, Academy of Management Journal, 61/5: 1920–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denrell, J., Fang, C. and Winter, S. G. (2003) ‘The economics of strategic opportunity’, Strategic Management Journal, 24/10: 977–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989), ‘Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage’, Management Science, 35/12: 1504–11.Google Scholar
Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (eds) (2000), The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eggers, J. P. and Kaplan, S. (2009), ‘Cognition and renewal: comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change’, Organization Science, 20/2: 461–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, J. P. and Kaplan, S. (2013), ‘Cognition and capabilities: a multi-level perspective’, Academy of Management Annals, 7/1: 295–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A. (2000), ‘Dynamic capabilities: what are they?’, Strategic Management Journal, 21/10–11: 1105–21.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2000), ‘Organizational routines as a source of continuous change’, Organization Science, 11/6: 611–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39/3: 484–510.Google Scholar
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2005), ‘Strategic organization: a field in search of microfoundations’, Strategic Organization, 3/4: 441–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2011), ‘The endogenous origins of experience, routines, and organizational capabilities: the poverty of stimulus’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7/2: 231–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H. and Madsen, T. L. (2012), ‘Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: individuals, processes, and structure’, Journal of Management Studies, 49/8: 1351–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, S. W. and Sputtek, R. (2011), ‘Rediscovering the individual in strategy: methodological challenges, strategies, and prospects’, in Bergh, D. D., and Ketchen, D. J. (eds), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, vol. VI, Building Methodological Bridges: 3–30. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. (2011), ‘Invited editorial: why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like’, Journal of Management, 37/5: 1413–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G. (2005), ‘Cognition and hierarchy: rethinking microfoundations of capabilities development’, Organization Science, 16/6: 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G. (2012), ‘Toward a behavioral theory of strategy’, Organization Science, 23/1: 267–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G. and Lecuona Torras, J. R. (2021). ‘A neo-Carnegie approach to the agency question: bridging the evolutionary and cognitive views of strategy’, Strategy Science, 6/4: 353–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D. and Ocasio, W. (2007), ‘Perspective – neo-Carnegie: the Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future’, Organization Science, 18/3: 523–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Grant, B. (1996), ‘Toward a knowledge-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S1: 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérard, S., Langley, A. and Seidl, D. (2013), ‘Rethinking the concept of performance in strategy research: towards a performativity perspective’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 566–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H. and Winter, S. G. (2007), Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P. and Healey, M. P. (2011), ‘Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: reflexion and reflection in strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 32/13: 1500–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2012), ‘The mirage of microfoundations’, Journal of Management Studies, 49/8: 1389–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2011), ‘Poverty of stimulus and absence of cause: some questions for Felin and Foss’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7/2: 295–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Kaplan, S. (2010), ‘Taking “strategy-as-practice” across the Atlantic’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Lampel, J. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXVII, The Globalization of Strategy Research: 51–71. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, P. A. (2009), ‘Strategy‐as‐practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ’It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2/3: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of strategy-as-practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75(8), 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, S. and Regnér, P. (2009), ‘Normative barriers to imitation: social complexity of core competences in a mutual fund industry’, Strategic Management Journal, 30/5: 517–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannan‐Narasimhan, R. and Lawrence, B. S. (2018), ‘How innovators reframe resources in the strategy‐making process to gain innovation adoption’, Strategic Management Journal, 39(3): 720–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013), ’Temporal work in strategy making’, Organization Science, 24/4: 965–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992), ‘Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology’, Organization Science, 3/3: 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1996), ‘What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning’, Organization Science, 7/5: 502–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy‐as‐practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C. and Groen, A. J. (2010), ‘The resource-based view: a review and assessment of its critiques’, Journal of Management, 36/1: 349–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D. (1995), ‘Strategic management and the exploration of diversity’, in Montgomery, C. A. (ed.), Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: 19–42. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippman, S. A. and Rumelt, R. P. (1982), ‘Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition’, Bell Journal of Economics, 13/2: 418–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makadok, R. (2001), ‘Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation’, Strategic Management Journal, 22/5: 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirabeau, L., Maguire, S. and Hardy, C. (2018), ‘Bridging practice and process research to study transient manifestations of strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 582–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, A., Chia, R. and Canales, J. I. (2020), ‘Noncognitive microfoundations: understanding dynamic capabilities as idiosyncractically refined sensitivities and predispositions’, Academy of Management Review, 45/2: 280–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2015), ‘Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 301–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parmigiani, A. and Howard-Grenville, J. (2011), ‘Routines revisited: exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives’, Academy of Management Annals, 5/1: 413–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peteraf, M. (1993), ‘The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view’, Strategic Management Journal, 14/3: 179–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, T., Lovallo, D. and Fox, C. (2011), ‘Behavioral strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 32/13: 1369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prashantham, S. and Healey, M. P. (2022), ‘Strategy as practice research: reflections on its rationale, approach, and contributions’, Journal of Management Studies, 59(8), e1–e17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, R. and Defillippi, R. J. (1990), ‘Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation and sustainable competitive advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 15/1: 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2003), ‘Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2008), ‘Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: steps towards a more dynamic view of strategy’, Human Relations, 61/4: 565–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2010), ‘Strategy process research and the RBV: social barriers to imitation’, in Mazzola, P., and Kellermanns, F. W. (eds), Handbook of Research on Strategy Process: 90–108. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Regnér, P. (2012), ‘Strategy as practice: untangling the emergence of competitive positions’, in Dagnino, G. B. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Competitive Strategy: 182–200. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Rivkin, J. W. (2000), ‘Imitation of complex strategies’, Management Science, 46/6: 824–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. (1984), ‘Towards a strategic theory of the firm’, in Lamb, R. B. (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management: 556–70. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Salvato, C. (2003), ‘The role of micro-strategies in the engineering of firm evolution’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C. (2009), ‘Capabilities unveiled: the role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes’, Organization Science, 20/2: 384–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilke, O., Hu, S. and Helfat, C. E. (2018), ‘Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research’, Academy of Management Annals, 12(1): 390–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. (2007), ‘General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic-discursive perspective’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spender, J. C. (1996), ‘Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S1: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulanski, G. (1996), ‘Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S2: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J. (2007), ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: nature and microfoundations’, Strategic Management Journal, 28/13: 1319–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18/7: 509–33.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wenzel, M., Danner-Schröder, A. and Spee, A. P. (2021), ‘Dynamic capabilities? Unleashing their dynamics through a practice perspective on organizational routines’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 30/4: 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. (1984), ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5/2: 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2018), ‘Greatness takes practice: on practice theory’s relevance to “Great Strategy”’, Strategy Science, 3/1: 343–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Regnér, P., Angwin, D., Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. (2020), Exploring Strategy: Text and Cases, 12th edn. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (1987), ‘Knowledge and competence as strategic assets’, in Teece, D. J. (ed.), The Competitive Advantage: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal: 159–84. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (1988), ‘On Coase, competence, and the corporation’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4/1: 163–80.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2003), ‘Understanding dynamic capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal, 24/10: 991–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2011), ‘Problems at the foundations? Comments on Felin and Foss’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7/2: 257–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2012), ‘Capabilities: their origins and ancestry’, Journal of Management Studies, 49/8: 1402–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zander, U. and Kogut, B. (1995), ‘Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test’, Organization Science, 6/1: 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollo, M. and Winter, S. G. (2002), ‘Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities’, Organization Science, 13/3: 339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. (1962), ‘Two faces of power’, American Political Science Review, 56/4: 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1974), ‘Art as collective action’, American Political Science Review, 39/6: 767–76.Google Scholar
Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A. (2000), ‘Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çalışkan, K. and Callon, M. (2010), ‘Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets’, Economy and Society, 39/1: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. and Law, J. (1997), ‘After the individual in society: lessons in collectivity from science, technology and society’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 22/2: 165–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., Millo, Y. and Muniesa, F. (2007), Market Devices. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carter, C., Clegg, S. and Kornberger, M. (2008a), ‘Strategy as practice’, Strategic Organization, 6/1: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C., Clegg, S. and Kornberger, M. (2008b), A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Studying Strategy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2009), Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Child, J. (1972), ‘Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice’, Sociology, 6/1: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. R. (1989), Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (2009), Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Courpasson, D., Dany, F. and Clegg, S. (2012), ‘Resisters at work: generating productive resistance in the workplace’, Organization Science, 23/3: 801–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1992), ‘Postscript on the societies of control’, October, 59/Winter: 3–7.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1939), A Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eriksson, P. and Lehtimäki, H. (2001), ‘Strategy rhetoric in city management: how the presumptions of classic strategic management live on?’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17/2: 201–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, W. N. and Sauder, M. (2007), ‘Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds 1’, American Journal of Sociology, 113/1: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2004), ‘Rethinking strategy: contemporary perspectives and debates’, European Management Review, 1/1: 43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2008), ‘Strategy as discourse in a global retailer: a supplement to rationalist and interpretive accounts’, Organization Studies, 29/2: 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, C. and Langley, A. (2011), ‘Strategy as practice and the narrative turn’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998), Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1982), ‘The subject and power’, in Dreyfus, H. L., and Rabinow, P. (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics: 208–26. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, L. (2013), Strategy: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedland, R. (2009), ‘Institution, practice, and ontology: toward a religious sociology’, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 27/1: 45–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1975 [1954]), The Great Crash 1929. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Galloway, A. R. (2012), The Interface Effect. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Galloway, A. R. and Thacker, E. (2007), The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gond, J. P., Cabantous, L. and Krikorian, F. (2018), ‘How do things become strategic? “Strategifying” corporate social responsibility’, Strategic Organization, 16/3: 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C. and Thomas, R. (2014), ‘Strategy, discourse and practice: the intensification of power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 320–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. (2000), ‘Strategic decision-making, discourse, and strategy as social practice’, Journal of Management Studies, 37/7: 955–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E. and Pennings, J. M. (1971), ‘A strategic contingencies’ theory of intraorganizational power’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16/2: 216–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinings, C. R., Hickson, D. J., Pennings, J. M. and Schneck, R. E. (1974), ‘Structural conditions of intraorganizational power’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1): 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamal, A. (2007), ‘Strategies of minority struggle for equality in ethnic states: Arab politics in Israel’, Citizenship Studies, 11/3: 263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, E., Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2018), ‘The power of PowerPoint: a visual perspective on meaning making in strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 894–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. (2012), ‘Governing the city: from planning to urban strategy’, Theory, Culture and Society, 29/2: 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. (2017), ‘The visible hand and the crowd, Strategic Organization, 15/2: 174‒93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. and Carter, C. (2010), ‘Manufacturing competition: how accounting practices shape strategy making in cities’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23/3: 325–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. and Clegg, S. (2011), ‘Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030’, Strategic Organization, 9/2: 136–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M., Justesen, L., Koed Madsen, A. and Mouritsen, J. (eds) (2015), Making Things Valuable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, P.-M. and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, M. (2012), ‘Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation’, Sociology, 38/1: 201–21.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. and Hassard, J. (eds) (1999), Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lederman, L. (1993), The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question? New York: Delta.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilley, S. (2001), ‘The language of strategy’, in Westwood, R., and Linstead, S. (eds), The Language of Organization: 66–89. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974), Power: A Radical View. London: MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1995 [1513]), The Prince, ed. Milner., S. J. London: Everyman.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2006), An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape the Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1964), One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCabe, D. (2010), ‘Strategy-as-power: ambiguity, contradiction and the exercise of power in a UK building society’, Organization, 17/2: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFall, L. and Ossandón, J. (2014), ‘What’s new in the “new, new economic sociology” and should organization studies care?’, in Adler, P., du Gay, P., Morgan, G., and Reed, M. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory, and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents: 510–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, P. (2001), ‘Governing by numbers: why calculative practices matter’, Social Research, 68/2: 379–96.Google Scholar
Miller, P. (2008), ‘Figuring out Organizations’, paper presented at Nobel symposium ‘Foundations of organizations’, Saltsjöbaden, Sweden, 28 August.Google Scholar
Mumby, D. K. (1987), ‘The political function of narrative in organizations’, Communication Monographs, 54/2: 113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F. (2011), ‘A flank movement in the understanding of valuation’, Sociological Review, 59/S2: 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muraro, L. (1996), Partire da sé e non farsi trovare. in Diotima, (ed.), La sapienza del partire da sè: 5–21. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Neff, G. and Stark, D. (2004), ‘Permanently beta’, in Howard, P. N., and Jones, S. (eds), Society Online: The Internet in Context: 173–88. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B. and Cooper, D. J. (1998), ‘Business planning as pedagogy: language and control in a changing institutional field’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43/2: 257–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packard, V. O. (1957), The Hidden Persuaders. New York: D. McKay.Google Scholar
Pälli, P., Vaara, E. and Sorsa, V (2009), ‘Strategy as text and discursive practice: a genre-based approach to strategizing in city administration’, Discourse and Communication, 3/3: 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1973), The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1985), The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Phillips, N., Sewell, G. and Jaynes, S. (2008), ‘Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research’, Organizational Research Methods, 11/4: 770–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierazzini, M. E., Bertelli, L. and Raviola, E. (2021), ‘Working with words: Italian feminism and organization studies’, Gender, Work & Organization, 28/4: 1260–81.Google Scholar
Pollock, N. and d’Adderio, L. (2012), ‘Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37/8: 565–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preda, A. (2006), ‘Socio-technical agency in financial markets’, Social Studies of Science, 36/5: 753–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salancik, G. R. and Pfeffer, J. (1977), ‘Who gets power – and how they hold on to it: a strategic-contingency model of power’, Organizational Dynamics, 5(3), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2005), ‘Strategic practice, “discourse” and the everyday interactional constitution of “power effects”’, Organization, 12/6: 803–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, S. Q. A., Lai, F. W., Shad, M. K. and Jan, A. A. (2022), ‘Developing a green governance framework for the performance enhancement of the oil and gas industry’, Sustainability, 14/7: 3735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955), ‘A behavioral model of rational choice’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69/1: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacker, E. (2004), ‘Foreword: protocol is as protocol does’, in Galloway, A. R. (ed.), Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization: xxiii–xxii. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, R., Sargent, L. and Hardy, C. (2011), ‘Managing organizational change: negotiating meaning and power – resistance relations’, Organization Science, 22/1: 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, J., Ferlie, E., Jukić, T. and Ongaro, E. (2021), ‘A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value’, Policy & Politics, 49/2: 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryggestad, K., Justesen, L. and Mouritsen, J. (2013), ‘Project temporalities: how frogs can become stakeholders’, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6/1: 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Sorsa, V. and Pälli, P. (2010), ‘On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization’, Organization, 17/6: 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, K., Rao, H. and Thomas, L. G. (2009), ‘From streets to suites: how the anti-biotech movement affected German pharmaceutical firms’, American Sociological Review, 74/1: 106–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (1996), ‘Strategy as practice’, Long Range Planning, 29/5: 731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A. and Mueller, F. (2010), ‘Strategy, enrolment and accounting: the politics of strategic ideas’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23/5: 626–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, W. H. (2013), The Organization Man. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

References

Alvesson, M. (2008), ‘The future of critical management studies’, in Barry, D., and Hansen, H. (eds), The Sage Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization: 13–30. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. (2022), The Triumph of Emptiness, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Blom, M. (2022), ‘The hegemonic ambiguity of big concepts in organization studies’, Human Relations, 75/11: 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2021), Doing Critical Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2007), ‘Constructing mystery: empirical matters in theory development’, Academy of Management Review, 32/4: 1265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2011), ‘Decolonializing discourse: critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis’, Human Relations, 64/9: 1121–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Sandberg, J. (2013), Constructing Research Questions. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Sandberg, J. (2014), ‘Habitat and habitus: boxed-in versus boxbreaking research’, Organization Studies, 35/7: 967–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S. (2003), ‘The great disappearing act: difficulties in doing “leadership”’, Leadership Quarterly, 14/3: 359–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S. (2012), ‘Un- and repacking leadership: context, relations, constructions and politics’, in Uhl-Bien, M., and Ospina, S. (eds), Advancing Relational Leadership Theory: A Conversation among Perspectives: 203–26. New York: Information Age.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (1995), ‘Strategic management as domination and emancipation: from planning to process to communication and praxis’, in Shrivastava, P., and Stubbart, C. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XI: 85–112. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (1996), Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T. and Willmott, H. (2009), ‘Introduction’, in Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., and Willmott, H. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies: 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2005), ‘From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking’, Organization Studies, 26/11: 1573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Huff, A. S. and Johnson, P. (2003), ‘Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L. and Ireland, D. R. (2006), ‘What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter?’, Academy of Management Journal, 49/1: 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennis, W. and O’Toole, J. (2005), ‘How business schools lost their way’, Harvard Business Review, 83/5: 96–104.Google ScholarPubMed
Berle, A. and Means, G. C. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blom, M. and Lundgren, M. (2013), ‘Strategy consultants doing strategy: how status and visibility affect strategizing’, African Journal of Business Management, 7/14: 1144–60.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromiley, P. and Rau, D. (2016), ‘Missing the point of the practice-based view’, Strategic Organization, 14/3: 260–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C., Clegg, S. and Kornberger, M. (2008a), ‘Strategy as practice?’, Strategic Organization, 6/1: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C., Clegg, S. and Kornberger, M. (2008b), A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Studying Strategy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Chalmers, L. V. (2001), Marketing Masculinities: Gender and Management Politics in Marketing Work. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. and Wright, M. (2009), ‘So, farewell then … reflections on editing the Journal of Management Studies’, Journal of Management Studies, 46/1: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. (2011), ‘Book review: Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice’, Organization Studies, 32/11: 1587–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contu, A. and Willmott, H. (2005), ‘You spin me around: the realist turn in organization and management studies’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/8: 1645–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courpasson, D. (2013), ‘On the erosion of “passionate scholarship”’, Organization Studies, 34/9: 1243–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Certeau, M. (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. and Davis, H. L. (1991), ‘Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns’, Australian Journal of Management, 16/1: 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2004), ‘Rethinking strategy: contemporary perspectives and debates’, European Management Review, 1/1: 43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2008), ‘Strategy as discourse in a global retailer: a supplement to rationalist and interpretive accounts’, Organization Studies, 29/2: 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2005), ‘Peripheral vision: discourse analysis in organization studies: the case for critical realism’, Organization Studies, 26/6: 915–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001), Making Social Sciences Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, M. (2010), The Age of Absurdity. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Fournier, V. and Grey, C. (2000), ‘At the critical moment: conditions and prospects for critical management studies’, Human Relations, 53/1: 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Y. (2010), ‘Organization studies: a space for ideas, identities and agonies’, Organization Studies, 31/6: 757–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmill, G. and Oakley, J. (1992), ‘Leadership: an alienating social myth?’, Human Relations, 45/2: 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (2010), ‘Introduction: what is strategy as practice?’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1972 [1968]), Knowledge and Human Interests. New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, C. and Thomas, R. (2014), ‘Strategy, discourse and practice: the intensification of power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 320–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headland, T., Pike, K. and Harris, M. (eds) (1990), Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hendry, J. (2000), ‘Strategic decision making, discourse, and strategy as social practice’, Journal of Management Studies, 37/7: 955–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2003), ‘Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004), ‘Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use’, Organization Studies, 25/4: 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2008), ‘The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 29/11: 1391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, P. (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Whittington, R. (2008a), ‘A strategy-as-practice approach to strategy research and education’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 17/4: 282–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Whittington, R. (2008b), ‘Hard to disagree, mostly’, Strategic Organization, 6/1: 101–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2/3: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kaplan, S., Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2016), ‘On the risk of studying practices in isolation: linking what, who, and how in strategy research’, Strategic Organization, 14/3: 248–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1984), ‘On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters’, in Atkinson, J. M., and Heritage, J. (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies of Conversation Analysis: 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, P., Balogun, J. and Beech, N. (2010), ‘Researching strategists and their identity in practice: building “close-with” relationships’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 243–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editor’s introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. (2009), ‘Poststructuralism in critical management studies’, in Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., and Willmott, H. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies: 76–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kärreman, D. and Alvesson, M. (2001), ‘Making newsmakers: conversational identity at work’, Organization Studies, 22/1: 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1990), ‘The concept of strategy in sociology: a note of dissent’, Sociology, 24/3: 475–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1995), ‘Strategy under the microscope: strategic management and IT in financial services’, Journal of Management Studies, 32/2: 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2021), ’Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.Google Scholar
Laine, P.-M. and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, D., Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (2003), ‘Critical approaches to strategic management’, in Alvesson, M., and Willmott, H. (eds), Studying Management Critically: 92–111. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, M. L. (1971), Directors: Myth and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discourse perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. (2005), ‘Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: the case of organization studies’, Management and Organization Review, 1/1: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, D. (2010), ‘Strategy-as-power: ambiguity, contradiction and the exercise of power in a UK building society’, Organization, 17/2: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1985), ‘The organization as a political arena’, Journal of Management Studies, 22/2: 133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (2004), Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. A. (1985), ‘Of strategies, deliberate and emergent’, Strategic Management Journal, 6/3: 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, F., Whittle, A., Gilchrist, A. and Lenney, P. (2013), ‘Politics and strategy practice: an ethnomethodologically-informed discourse analysis perspective’, Business History, 55/7: 1168–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, T. (2009), ‘Organizations and the natural environment’, in Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., and Willmott, H. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies: 125–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oswick, C., Fleming, P. and Hanlon, G. (2011), ‘From borrowing to blending: rethinking the processes of organizational theory building’, Academy of Management Review, 36/2: 318–37.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1973), The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1977), ‘Strategy formulation as a political process’, International Studies in Management and Organization, 7/2: 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1992), ‘Understanding power in organizations’, California Management Review, 35/1: 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Phillips, N. and Dar, S. (2009), ‘Strategy’, in Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., and Willmott, H. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies: 414–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pondy, L. (1978), ‘Leadership as a language game’, in McCall, J., and Lombardo, M. (eds), Leadership: Where Else Can We Go?: 87–99. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, M. (2009), ‘Critical realism in critical management studies’, in Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., and Willmott, H. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies: 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2008), ‘Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: steps towards a dynamic view of strategy’, Human Relations, 61/4: 565–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2011), ‘Book review: Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice’, M@n@gement, 14/2: 157–76.Google Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2013), ‘Strategy-as-practice at a crossroads’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 547–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003), ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2005), ‘Strategic practice, “discourse” and the everyday interactional constitution of “power effects”’, Organization, 12/6: 803–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2010), ‘Researching everyday practice: the ethnomethodological contribution’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 79–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shrivastava, P. (1986), ‘Is strategic management ideological?’, Journal of Management, 12/3: 363–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, A., Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2009), ‘Critical performativity: the unfinished business of critical management studies’, Human Relations, 62/4: 537–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R., Sargent, L. and Hardy, C. (2011), ‘Managing organizational change: negotiating meaning and power–resistance relations’, Organization Science, 22/1: 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkateswaran, R. and Prabhu, G. (2010), ‘Taking stock of research methods in strategy-as-practice’, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8/2: 156–62.Google Scholar
Whittington, R. (1996), ‘Strategy as practice’, Long Range Planning, 29/5: 731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2004), ‘Strategy after modernism: recovering practice’, European Management Review, 1/1: 62–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2007), ‘Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye’, Organizational Studies, 28/10: 1575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. and Vaara, E. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.Google Scholar
Wickert, C. and Schaefer, S. (2015), ‘Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies’, Human Relations, 68/1: 107–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×