Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T13:08:10.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 31 - Studying Strategy as Practice through Historical Methods

from Part IV - Methodological Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2025

By
Mona Ericson ,
Leif Melin  and
Andrew Popp
Edited by
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
emlyon Business School
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Mona Ericsson, Leif Melin and Andrew Popp discuss the fruitfulness of historical methods for strategy as practice research. The authors start by directing our attention to the limitations of how business historians typically write about strategy, which is inductive and based on corporate archives and thus typically silent about what really goes on inside a firm. Drawing on their own rich and vast background in historical research, the authors then introduce four categories of methods suitable that giving voice to strategy practitioners about their strategy-making over time: (1) written sources and narratives; (2) micro history; (3) ego documents; and (4) lived experience. Using their own research projects as illustrations, Ericsson, Melin and Popp introduce each of these categories of historical methods and provide insightful reflections on their challenges and limits. The authors stress that these historical methods allow open a window for critical reflection on time, providing us with alternatives for evaluating present occurrences and for appreciating the inherently temporal dimension of practice.

Keywords

strategy as practicepractice approachhistorical methods
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 557 - 574
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adorisio, A. L. M. and Mutch, A. (2013), ‘In search of historical methods’, Management and Organizational History, 8/2: 105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyres, N.S., De Massis, A., Foss, N. J., Frattini, F., Jones, G. and Silverman, B. S. (2020), ‘History-informed strategy research: the promise of history and historical research methods in advancing strategy scholarship’, Strategic Management Journal, 41/3: 343–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Beech, N., and Johnson, P. (2015), ‘Researching strategists and their identity in practice: building “close-with” relationships’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 447–61. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, D. and Elmes, M. (1997), ‘Strategy retold: toward a narrative view of strategic discourse’, Academy of Management Review, 22/2: 429–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E. and Taylor, S. (2013), ‘Writing history into management research’, Management and Organizational History, 8/2: 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boje, D. M. (1991), ‘The storytelling organization: a study of story performance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36/1: 106–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. and Thompson, E. (2013), ‘A narrative approach to strategy-as-practice’, Business History, 55/7: 1143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunninge, O. (2009), ‘Using history in organizations: how managers make purposeful reference to history in strategy processes’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22/1: 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucheli, M. and Wadhwani, R. D. (2014), Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burgelman, R. A., Floyd, S. W., Lamanen, T., Mantere, S., Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2018), ‘Strategic processes and practices: dialogues and intersections’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 529–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Hunt, C. (2007), ‘Complexity in practice’, Human Relations, 60/5: 793–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chia, R. (2004), ‘Strategy-as-practice: reflections on the research agenda’, European Management Review, 1/1: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., Kwon, W. and Wodak, R. (2012), ‘A context-sensitive approach to analysing talk in strategy meetings’, British Journal of Management, 23/4: 455–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M. and Popp, A. (2023), The Business of Emotions in Modern History. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silveira Santos, L. L., Tureta, C. and Felix, B. (2021), ‘A qualitative method proposal for the study of strategy as practice’, Journal of Contemporary Administration, 25/2: 1–17.Google Scholar
de Vito, C. G. (2019), ‘History without scale: microspatial perspective’, Past & Present, 242/Supplement 14: 348–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, J. (2019), ‘Playing with scales: the global and the micro, the macro and the nano’, Past & Present, 242/Supplement 14: 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, S. (2013), ‘The silence of the archives: business history, post-colonialism and archival ethnography’, Management and Organizational History, 8/2: 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, S. (2014), ‘Solid intentions: an archival ethnography of corporate architecture and organizational remembering’, Organization, 21/4: 514–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1985), Poetry and Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, D. (2004), ‘Organizing practices in services: capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation’, Strategic Organization, 2/1: 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, M. (2014), ‘On the dynamics of fluidity and open-endedness of strategy process: toward a strategy-as-practicing conceptualization’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30/1: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, M. (2018), Moral Human Agency. A Missing Dimension in Strategy as Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, M. and Melin, L. (2010), ‘Strategizing and history’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 326–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fear, J. (2014), ‘Mining the past: historicizing organizational learning and change’, in Bucheli, M., and Wadhwani, R. D. (eds), Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods: 168–91. Oxford; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fellman, S. and Popp, A. (2013), ‘Lost in the archive: the business historian in distress’, in Czarniawska, B., and Löfgren, O. (eds), Coping with Excess: How Organizations, Communities and Individuals Manage Overflows: 216–43. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Foster, W. M., Coraiola, D. M., Suddaby, R., Kroezen, J. and Chandler, D. (2017), ‘The strategic use of historical narratives: a theoretical framework’, Business History, 59/8: 1176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Random House.Google Scholar
French, M. and Popp, A. (2010), ‘“Practically the uniform of the tribe”: dress codes among commercial travelers’, Enterprise and Society, 11/3: 436–67.Google Scholar
Fulbrook, M. and Rublack, U. (2010), ‘In relation: the “social self” and ego-documents’, German History, 28/3: 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1989), Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ghobrial, J-P. A. (2019), ‘Moving stories and what they tell us: early modern mobility between microhistory and global history’, Past & Present, 242/Supplement 14: 243–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudeau, M. (2008), ‘The drafts of strategy: opening up plans and their uses’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, M.-L. and Bouty, I. (2011), ‘The emergence of an influential practice: food for thought’, Organization Studies, 32/7: 921–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P. (2012), ‘Business history: a cultural and narrative approach’, Business History Review, 86/4: 693–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargadon, A. B. and Wadhwani, R. D. (2022), ‘Theorizing with microhistory’, Academy of Management Review, 48/4.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1962), Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hendry, K. P., Kiel, G. C. and Nicholson, G. (2010), ‘How boards strategise: a strategy as practice view’, Long Range Planning, 43/1: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R. and Popp, A. (2013), ‘Emotion, succession, and the family firm: Josiah Wedgwood & Sons’, Business History, 55/6: 892–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004), ‘Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use’, Organization Studies, 25/4: 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, P. (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ’It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. R. H. (2002), ‘Routines, capabilities and the growth of the firm: Messrs Ross & Glendining, Dunedin, 1862–1900’, Australian Economic History Review, 42/1: 34–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, B. and Messner, M. (2010), ‘Accounting and strategizing: a case study from new product development’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35/2: 184–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013), ‘Temporal work in strategy making’, Organization Science, 24/4: 965–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipping, M. and Cailluet, L. (2010), ‘Mintzberg’s emergent and deliberate strategies: tracking Alcan’s activities in Europe, 1928–2007’, Business History Review, 84/1: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobrak, C. and Schneider, A. (2011), ‘Varieties of business history: subject and methods for the twenty-first century’, Business History, 53/3: 401–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2021), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.Google Scholar
Kouamé, S. and Langley, A. (2018), ‘Relating microprocesses to macro-outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 559–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwayu, S., Lal, B. and Abubakre, M. (2018), ‘Enhancing organizational competitiveness via social media – a strategy as practice perspective’, Information Systems Frontiers, 20: 439–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipartito, K. J. (1995), ‘Culture and the practice of business history’, Business and Economic History, 24/2: 1–42.Google Scholar
Lipartito, K. J. (2008), ‘The future of Alfred Chandler’, Enterprise and Society, 9/3: 430–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipartito, K. J. (2013), ‘Connecting the cultural and the material in business history’, Enterprise and Society, 14/4: 686–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipartito, K. J. (2020), ‘The ontology of economic things’, Enterprise and Society, 21/3: 592–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubinski, C. and Gartner, W. B. (2020), ‘History as a source and method for family business research’, in Calabrò, A. (ed.), A Research Agenda for Family Business: A Way Ahead for the Field: 29–59. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
MacKay, B., Chia, R. and Nair, A. K. (2021), ‘Strategy-in-practices: a process philosophical approach to understanding strategy emergence and organizational outcomes’, Human Relations, 74/9: 1337–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnússon, S. G. (2017), ‘Far-reaching microhistory: the use of microhistorical perspective in a globalized world’, Rethinking History, 21/3: 312–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascuch, M., Dekker, R. and Baggerman, A. (2016), ‘Egodocuments and history: a short account of the longue durée’, The Historian, 78/1: 11–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGovern, T. and McLean, T. (2013), ‘The growth and development of Clarke Chapman from 1864 to 1914’, Business History, 55/3: 448–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, C. (2006), ‘Writing the ghost writer back in: Alfred Sloan, Alfred Chandler, John McDonald and the intellectual origins of corporate strategy’, Management and Organizational History, 1/2: 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, C. (2009), ‘Mementos: looking backwards at the Honda motorcycle case, 2003–1973’, in Clarke, S., Lamoreaux, N. R., and Usselman, S. (eds), The Challenge of Remaining Innovative: Lessons from Twentieth-Century American Business: 219–42. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McKinlay, A. (2013), ‘Following Foucault into the archives: clerks, careers and cartoons’, Management and Organizational History, 8/2: 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medick, H. (2016), ‘Turning global? Microhistory in extension’, Historische Antropologie, 24/2: 241–52.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1989), Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mirabeau, L., Maguire, S. and Hardy, C. (2018), ‘Bridging practice and process research to study transient manifestations of strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 582–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nix, A. and Decker, S. (2021), ‘Using digital sources: the future of business history?’, Business History, 65/6: 1048–71.Google Scholar
Peltonen, M. (2001), ‘Clues, margins, and monads: the micro–macro link in historical research’, History and Theory, 40/3: 347–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perchard, A., MacKenzie, N., Decker, S. and Favero, G. (2017), ‘Clio in the business school: historical approaches in strategy, international business and entrepreneurship’, Business History, 59/6: 904–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, A. (2001), ‘Specialty production, personal capitalism and auditors’ reports: Mintons Ltd, c. 1870–1900’, Accounting, Business and Financial History, 10/3: 347–69.Google Scholar
Popp, A. (2012), Entrepreneurial Families: Business, Marriage and Life in the Early Nineteenth Century. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Popp, A. (2013), ‘Making choices in time’, Enterprise and Society, 14/3: 467–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, A. (2014), ‘The broken cotton speculator’, History Workshop Journal, 8/1: 133–56.Google Scholar
Popp, A. (2020), ‘Histories of business and the everyday’, Enterprise and Society, 21/3: 622–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, A. and Fellman, S. (2020), ‘Power, archives and the making of rhetorical organizational histories: a stakeholder perspective’, Organization Studies, 41/11: 1531–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, A. and Holt, R. (2012), ‘Entrepreneurship and being: the case of the Shaws’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25/1–2: 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, A. and Holt, R. (2013), ‘The presence of entrepreneurial opportunity’, Business History, 55/1: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raff, D. (2013), ‘How to do things with time’, Enterprise and Society, 14/3: 435–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raff, D. M. G. and Scranton, P. (eds) (2016), The Emergence of Routines: Entrepreneurship, Organization, and Business History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1992), Oneself as the Other. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlinson, M., Hassard, J. and Decker, S. (2014), ‘Research strategies for organizational history: a dialogue between historical theory and organization theory’, Academy of Management Review, 39/3: 250–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. (1974), Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J. and Dall’Alba, G. (2009), ‘Returning to practice anew: a life-world perspective’, Organization Studies, 30/12: 1349–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzkopf, S. (2012), ‘What is an archive – and where is it? Why business historians need a constructive theory of the archive’, Business Archives, 105/11: 1–9.Google Scholar
Scranton, P. (2008), ‘Beyond Chandler?’, Enterprise and Society, 9/3: 426–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebohm, T. M. (2004), Hermeneutics: Method and Methodology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Seidl, D., Grossman-Hensel, B. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2021), ‘Strategy as practice and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 481–500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stensaker, L. and Falkenberg, J. (2007), ‘Making sense of different responses to corporate change’, Human Relations, 60/1: 137–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakhathi, A., le Roux, C. and Davis, A. (2019), ‘Sustainable leaders’ influencing strategies for institutionalising organizational change towards corporate sustainability: a strategy-as-practice perspective’, Journal of Change Management, 19/4: 246–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinning, M. and Lubinski, C. (2022), ‘Ego documents in management and organizational history’, Management and Organizational History, 17/3–4: 166–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosh, J. (2010), The Pursuit of History. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Trivellato, F. (2015), ‘Microstoria/microhistoire/microhistory’, French Politics, Culture & Society, 33/1: 122–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (2018), ‘Strategy and virtue: developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics’, Strategic Organization, 16/3: 323–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Lamberg, J-A. (2016), ‘Taking historical embeddedness seriously: three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research’, Academy of Management Review, 41/4: 633–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Manen, M. (1990), Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Wadhwani, R. D. and Bucheli, M. (2014), ‘The future of the past in management and organization studies’, in Bucheli, M., and Wadhwani, R. D. (eds), Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods: 3–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wadhwani, R. D. and Decker, S. (2017), ‘Clio’s toolkit: the practice of historical methods in organizational research’, in Mir, R., and Jain, S. (eds), Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies: 113–27. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wei, Z. and Zhang, L. (2020), ‘How to perform strategic change? A strategy as practice perspective’, Chinese Management Studies, 14/3: 811–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. and Mayer, M. (2000), The European Corporation: Strategy, Structure, and Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L. and Yakis-Douglas, B. (2011), ‘Opening strategy: evolution of a precarious profession’, British Journal of Management, 22/3: 531–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×