Baumard, P. (1999), Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2005), ‘From intended strategy to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking’, Organization Studies, 26/11: 1573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balogun, J., Huff, A. S. and Johnson, P. (2003), ‘Three responses to methodological challenges of studying strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bencherki, N., Sergi, V., Cooren, F. and Vásquez, C. (2019), ‘How strategy comes to matter: strategizing as the communicative materialization of matters of concern’, Strategic Organization, 19/4: 608–35.Google Scholar

Bennis, W. G. and O’Toole, J. (2005), ‘How business schools lost their way’, Harvard Business Review, 83/5: 96–105.Google ScholarPubMed

Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branson, R. (2007), Screw It, Let’s Do It: Lessons in Life. London: Virgin Books.Google Scholar

Chia, R. (2004), ‘Strategy-as-practice: reflections on the research agenda’, European Management Review, 1/1: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, R. (1976), ‘The open field’, Human Relations, 29: 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Certeau, M. (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2007), ‘Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames’, Human Relations, 60/1: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detienne, M. and Vernant, J. P. (1978), Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (1988), ‘The Socratic and Platonic basis of cognitivism’, AI & Society, 2/2: 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (1991), Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dunne, J. (1993), Back to the Rough Ground: ‘Phronesis’ and ‘Techné’ in Modern Philosophy and in Aristotle. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Elias, N. (1978), What Is Sociology? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Elias, N. (1991), The Society of Individuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2008), ‘Strategy as discourse in a global retailer: a supplement to rationalist and interpretive accounts’, Organization Studies, 29/2: 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2010), ‘Strategy and strategizing: a poststructuralist perspective’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Lampel, J. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXVII, The Globalization of Strategy Research: 75–109. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. (1972), The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1984), ‘Truth and power’, in Rabinow, P. (ed.), The Foucault Reader: 51–75. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles and Practice. London: Travistock.Google Scholar

Hendry, J. and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995), Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingold, T. (2000), The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. (2003), ‘Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. (2004), ‘Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use’, Organization Studies, 25/4: 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jullien, F. (2000), Detour and Access: Strategies of Meaning in China and Greece. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Jullien, F. (2004), A Treatise on Efficacy: Between Western and Chinese Thinking, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laine, P.-M. and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindblom, C. (1959), ‘The science of muddling through’, Public Administration Review, 19/2: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKay, B., Chia, R. and Nair, A. (2020), ‘Strategy-in-Practices: a process-philosophical approach to understanding strategy emergence and organizational outcomes’, Human Relations, 74/9: 1337–69.Google Scholar

Mantere, S. (2005), ‘Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity’, Strategic Organization, 3/2: 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. G. (1972), ‘Model bias in social action’, Review of Educational Research, 42/4: 413–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCabe, D. (2010), ‘Strategy-as-power: ambiguity, contradiction and the exercise of power in a UK building society’, Organization, 17/2: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (2004), Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. A. (1985), ‘Of strategies, deliberate and emergent’, Strategic Management Journal, 6: 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nonaka, I. and Toyama, R. (2007), ‘Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis)’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16/3: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (1986), The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2013), ‘Discourse revisited: dimensions and employment of first-order strategy discourse during institutional adoption’, Strategic Management Journal, 34/8: 935–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeffer, J. and Fong, C. T. (2002), ‘The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1/1: 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, M. (2009), The Tacit Dimension Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Raphals, L. (1992), Knowing Words: Wisdom and Cunning in the Classical Traditions of China and Greece. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasche, A. (2008), The Paradoxical Foundation of Strategic Management. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Rasche, A. and Chia, R. (2009), ‘Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective’, Organization Studies, 30(7): 713–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Regnér, P. (2003), ‘Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2005), ‘The sites of organizations’, Organization Studies, 26(3): 465–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, J. (1998), Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Stacey, R. (2007), Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Starkey, K. and Tempest, S. (2009), ‘The winter of our discontent – the design challenge for business schools’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8/4: 576–86.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2010), ‘Practice, strategy making and intentionality: a Heideggerian onto-epistemology for strategy as practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 47–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Mises, L. (1998 [1949]). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics (Scholar’s edn.). Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1968 [1922]), Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (2001), Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Werle, F. and Seidl, D. (2015), ‘The layered materiality of strategizing: epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics’, British Journal of Management, 26(S1): S67–S89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittington, R. (1996), ‘Strategy as practice’, Long Range Planning, 29/5: 731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittington, R. (2003), ‘The work of strategizing and organizing: for a practice perspective’, Strategic Organization, 1/1: 117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittle, A., Gilchrist, A., Mueller, F. and Lenney, P. (2021), ‘The art of stage-craft: a dramaturgical perspective on strategic change’, Strategic Organization, 19/4: 636–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allard-Poesi, F. (2010), ‘A Foucauldian perspective on strategic practice: strategy as the art of (un)folding’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 168–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: Sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, D. and Elmes, M. (1997), ‘Strategy retold: toward a narrative view of strategic discourse’, Academy of Management Review, 22/2: 429–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benner, P. (1994), ‘The role of articulation in understanding practice and experience as sources of knowledge in clinical nursing’, in Tully, J. (ed.), Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: 136–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Benner, P., Hooper-Kyriakidis, P. and Stannard, D. (1999), Clinical Wisdom and Interventions in Critical Care. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.Google Scholar

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (1975), Strategy Alternatives for the British Motorcycle Industry. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgelman, R. A., Floyd, S. W., Laamanen, T., Mantere, S., Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2018), ‘Strategy processes and practices: dialogues and intersections’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 531–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, S. and Yanow, D. (1996), ‘Culture and organizational learning’, in Cohen, M., and Sproull, L. (eds), Organizational Learning: 430–59. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Dalpiaz, E. and Di Stefano, G. (2018), ‘A universe of stories: mobilizing narrative practices during transformative change’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 664–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2007), ‘Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames’, Human Relations, 60/1: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixit, A. K. and Nalebuff, B. J. (2008), The Art of Strategy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (1985), ‘Holism and hermeneutics’, in Hollinger, R. (ed.), Hermeneutics and Praxis: 227–47. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (1991a), Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (1991b), ‘Reflection on the workshop on “the self”’, Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, 16/1: 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (2000), ‘Responses’, in Wrathall, M., and Malpas, J. (eds), Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus: 313–49. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2008), ‘Strategy as discourse in a global retailer: a supplement to rationalist and interpretive accounts’, Organization Studies, 29/2: 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garud, R., Gehman, J. and Kumaraswamy, A. (2011), ‘Complexity arrangements for sustained innovation: lessons from 3 M Corporation’, Organization Studies, 32/6: 737–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gawande, A. (2002), Complications: A Surgeon’s Notes on an Imperfect Science. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Gomez, M.-L. (2010), ‘A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 141–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goold, M. (1992), ‘Design, learning and planning: a further observation on the design school debate’, Strategic Management Journal, 13/2: 169–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadjimichael, D. and Tsoukas, H. (2019), ‘Towards a better understanding of tacit knowledge in organizations: taking stock and moving forward’, Academy of Management Annals, 13: 672–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Grant, D. (2005), ‘Discourse and collaboration: the role of conversations and collective identity’, Academy of Management Review, 30/1: 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harré, R. and Gillett, G. (1994), The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1962), Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Hendry, J. and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heracleous, L. and Jacobs, C. D. (2012), Crafting Strategy: Embodied Metaphors in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hodgkinson, G. P. and Wright, G. (2002), ‘Confronting strategic inertia in a top management team: learning from failure’, Organization Studies, 23/6: 949–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery Hunter, K. (1996), ‘Narrative, literature and the clinical exercise of practical reason’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 21: 303–20.Google Scholar

Huy, Q. N. (2012), ‘Emotions in strategic organization: opportunities for impactful research’, Strategic Organization, 10/3: 240–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. and Bednarek, R. (2018), Toward a social practice theory of relational competing Strategic Management Journal, 39(3): 794–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. and Kaplan, S. (2015), ‘Strategy tools-in-use: a framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice’, Strategic Management Journal, 36(4): 537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. and Wilson, D. C. (2002), ‘Top teams and strategy in a UK university’, Journal of Management Studies, 39/3: 355–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R. and Spee, P. (2015), Making a Market for Acts of God: The Practice of Risk Trading in the Global Reinsurance Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2(3): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions, Human Relations, 75(8): 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013), ‘Temporal work in strategy making’, Organization Science, 24/4: 965–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, E., Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2018), ‘The power of PowerPoint: a visual perspective on meaning making in strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39(3): 894–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1996), ‘What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning’, Organization Science, 7/5: 502–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022),’ Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kouamé, S. and Langley, A. (2018), ‘Relating microprocesses to macro-outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research’, Strategic Management Journal, 39(3): 559–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Küpers, W., Mantere, S. and Statler, M. (2013), ‘Strategy as storytelling: a phenomenological collaboration’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 22/1: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laine, P.-M. and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langley, A. (2007), ‘Process thinking in strategic organization’, Strategic Organization, 5/3: 271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacIntyre, A. (1985), After Virtue, 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

MacKay, B., Chia, R. and Nair, A. K. (2021), ‘Strategy-in-practices: a process philosophical approach to understanding strategy emergence and organizational outcomes’, Human Relations, 74(9): 1337–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maitlis, S. and Lawrence, T. B. (2003), ‘Orchestral manoeuvres in the dark: understanding failure in organizational strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantere, S. (2010), ‘A Wittgensteinian perspective on strategizing’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 155–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mantere, S. (2013), ‘What is organizational strategy? A language-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 50/8: 1408–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, S. J. and Wilson, D. C. (2006), ‘Perspectives on organizational decision-making’, in Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Nord, W. R. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies: 469–84. 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (1994), The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (2007), Tracking Strategies: Toward a General Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. A. (1982), ‘Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial firm’, Academy of Management Journal, 25/3: 465–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. A. (1985), ‘Of strategies, deliberate and emergent’, Strategic Management Journal, 6/3: 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mirabeau, L, Maguire, S. and Hardy, C. (2018), ‘Bridging practice and process research to study transient manifestations of strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 582–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery, C. A. (2013), The Strategist. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Mueller, F., Whittle, A., Gilchrist, A. and Lenney, P. (2013), ‘Politics and strategy practice: an ethnomethodologically-informed discourse analysis perspective’, Business History, 55: 1168–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007), ‘Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work’, Organization Studies, 28/9: 1435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orr, J. E. (1996), Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar

Paroutis, S., Franco, L. A. and Papadopoulos, T. (2015), ‘Visual interactions with strategy tools: producing strategic knowledge in workshops’, British Journal of Management, 26/1: 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pascale, R. T. (1984), ‘Perspectives on strategy: the real story behind Honda’s success’, California Management Review, 26/3: 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettigrew, A. M. (1992), ‘The character and significance of process strategy research’, Strategic Management Journal, 13/S2: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1962), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. and Prosch, H. (1975), Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Porac, J. F., Thomas, H. and Baden-Fuller, C. (1989), ‘Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers’, Journal of Management Studies, 26/4: 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasche, A. and Chia, R. (2009), ‘Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective’, Organization Studies, 30/7: 713–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reckwitz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Regnér, P. (2003), ‘Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riemer, K. and Johnston, R. B. (2017), ‘Clarifying ontological inseparability with Heidegger’s analysis of equipment’, MIS Quarterly, 41/4: 1059–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, M. (2000), ‘Coping and its contrasts’, in Wrathall, M., and Malpas, J. (eds), Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus: 7–28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rumelt, R. P. (2011), Good Strategy/Bad Strategy, New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (1963), The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003), ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandberg, J. and Tsoukas, H. (2011), ‘Grasping the logic of practice: theorizing through practical rationality’, Academy of Management Review, 36/2: 338–60.Google Scholar

Sandberg, J. and Tsoukas, H. (2020), ‘Sensemaking reconsidered: towards a broader understanding through phenomenology’, Organization Theory, 1: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sawyer, K. (2007), Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2000), ‘Coping with others with folk psychology’, in Wrathall, M., and Malpas, J. (eds), Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus: 29–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2005), ‘The sites of organizations’, Organization Studies, 26/3: 465–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seidl, D. (2007), ‘General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic-discursive perspective’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seidl, D. and Werle, F. (2018), ‘Inter-organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta-problems: requisite variety and dynamics of participation’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 830–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shotter, J. and Katz, A. M. (1996), ‘Articulating a practice from within the practice itself: establishing formative dialogues by the use of a “social poetics”’, Concepts and Transformation, 1/2–3: 213–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillince, J., Jarzabkowski, P. and Shaw, D. (2012), ‘Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity’, Organization Science, 23/3: 630–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spee, A. P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2011), ‘Strategic planning as communicative process. Organization Studies, 32/9: 1217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spinosa, C., Flores, F. and Dreyfus, H. (1997), Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action, and the Cultivation of Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1985a), Philosophical Papers, vol. I, Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, C. (1985b), Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, C. (1991), ‘The dialogical self’, in Hiley, D., Bohman, J., and Shusterman, R. (eds), The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture: 304–14, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1993), ‘Engaged agency and background in Heidegger’, in Guignon, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger: 317–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1995), Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2005), Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2009), ‘A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations’, Organization Science, 20/6: 941–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2010), ‘Strategic decision making and knowledge: a Heideggerian approach’, in Wilson, D., and Nutt, P. (eds), Handbook of Decision Making: 379–402. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2011), ‘How should we understand tacit knowledge? A phenomenological view’, in Easterby-Smith, M., and Lyles, M. A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: 453–76. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2018a), Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics, Strategic Organization, 16: 323–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2018b), ‘Praxis, character, and competence: from a behavioral to a communitarian view of the firm’, in Augier, M., Fang, C., and Rindova, V. P. (eds), Behavioral Strategy in Perspective (Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 39): 181–94. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2019), Philosophical Organization Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2021), ‘Process theorizing and routine dynamics: the case for performative phenomenology’, in Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., Adderio, L. D., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 37–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (2002), ‘The conduct of strategy research’, in Pettigrew, A. M., Thomas, H., and Whittington, R. (eds), Handbook of Strategy and Management: 411–35. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy as practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaara, E., Kleymann, B. and Seristö, H. (2004), ‘Strategies as discursive constructions: the case of airline alliances’, Journal of Management Studies, 41/1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaara, E., Sorsa, V. and Pälli, P. (2010), ‘On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plans and its power effects in a city organization’, Organization, 17/6: 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van de Ven, A. H. and Poole, M. S. (2005), ‘Alternative approaches for studying organizational change’, Organization Studies, 26/9: 1377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vuori, N., Vuori, T. O. and Huy, Q. N. (2018), ‘Emotional practices: how masking negative emotions impacts the post-acquisition integration process’, Strategic Management Journal, 39: 859–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wakefield, J. and Dreyfus, H. (1991), ‘Intentionality and the phenomenology of action’, in Lepore, E., and van Gulick, R. (eds), John Searle and His Critics: 259–70. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (2001), ‘Substitutes for strategy’, in Weick, K. E., Making Sense of the Organization: 345–60. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittington, R. (2007), ‘Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye’, Organization Studies, 28/10: 1575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1979), On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1980a), Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. II, ed. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1980b), Culture and Value, ed. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wright, R. P., Paroutis, S. and Blettner, D. P. (2013), ‘How useful are the strategic tools we teach in business schools?’, Journal of Management Studies, 50/1: 92–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yanow, D. (2015), ‘After mastery: insights from practice theorizing’, in Garud, R., Simpson, B., Langley, A., and Tsoukas, H. (eds), The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations: Ch. 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yanow, D. and Tsoukas, H. (2009), ‘What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account’, Journal of Management Studies, 46/8: 1339–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvesson, M. and Blom, M. (2022), ‘The hegemonic ambiguity of big concepts in organization studies’, Human Relations, 75/1: 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1967), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1991), De la justification: Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bower, J. L. (1970), Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Bower, J. L. and Gilbert, C. G. (2005), From Resource Allocation to Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016), ‘The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics’, Organization Science, 27/3, 594–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgelman, R. A. (1994), ‘Fading memories: a process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39/1: 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgelman, R. A. (2005), Strategy Is Destiny: How Strategy-Making Shapes a Company’s Future, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Burgelman, R. A., Floyd, S. W., Laamanen, T., et al. (2018), ‘Strategy processes and practices: dialogues and intersections’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3, 531–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, M. (1986), ‘Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, in Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?: 196–223. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chia, R. and Tsoukas, H. (2002), ‘On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change’, Organization Science, 13/5: 567–82.Google Scholar

Christensen, C. M. and Bower, J. L. (1996), ‘Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/3: 197–218.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahrendorf, R. (2005), Engagierte Beobachter: Die Intellektuellen und die Versuchungen der Zeit. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar

Denis, J.-L., Lamothe, L. and Langley, A. (2001), ‘The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 44/4: 809–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dittrich, K., Guérard, S. and Seidl, D. (2016), ‘Talking about routines: the role of reflective talk in routine change’, Organization Science, 27/3: 678–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eberle, T. (1992), ‘A new paradigm for the sociology of knowledge: “the social construction of reality” after 25 years’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 18/2: 493–502.Google Scholar

Elkana, Y. (1986), Anthropologie der Erkenntnis. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2015), ‘Theory of routine dynamics and connections to strategy as practice’, in Golshorki, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook on Strategy as Practice: 317–30, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011), ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’, Organization Science, 22/5: 1240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48/1: 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., d’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016), ‘Beyond routines as things: introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics’, Organization Science, 27/3: 505–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M .S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L., et al. (eds) (2021), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleck, L. (1980), Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Floyd, S. W. and Lane, P. J. (2000), ‘Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal’, Academy of Management Review, 25/1: 145–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. (1971), Die Ordnung der Dinge: Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1987), Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Gomez, P.-Y. and Jones, B. C. (2000), ‘Conventions: an interpretation of deep structure in organizations’, Organization Science, 11/6: 696–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, N. (1987), Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Grand, S. (2003), ‘Praxisrelevanz versus Praxisbezug der Forschung in der Managementforschung’, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 63/5: 599–604.Google Scholar

Grand, S. (2016), Routines, Strategies and Management: Engaging for Recurrent Creation ‘at the Edge’. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grand, S. and Ackeret, A. (2012), ‘Managing knowledge: a process view’, in Schultz, M., Maguire, S., Langley, A., and Tsoukas, H. (eds), Constructing Identity in and around Organizations: 261–305. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grand, S. and Bartl, D. (2019), ‘Making new strategic moves possible: how executive management enacts strategizing routines to strengthen entrepreneurial agility’, in Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., and Jarzabkowski, P (eds), Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 61: 123–52. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Grant, R. M. (2003), ‘Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors’, Strategic Management Journal, 24/6: 491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guba, E. and Lincoln, Y. (1994), ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, in Denzin, N., and Lincoln, Y. (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research: 105–17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1999), The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hardy, C. and Thomas, R. (2014), ‘Strategy, discourse and practice: the intensification of power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 320–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, J. and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, E. (1931), Cartesianische Meditationen: Eine Einleitung in die Phänomenologie. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. (2004), ‘Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use’, Organization Studies, 25/1: 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. and Kaplan, S. (2015), ‘Strategy tools-in-use: a framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice’, Strategic Management Journal, 36/4: 537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. and Whittington, R. (2008), ‘Directions for a troubled discipline: strategy research, teaching, and practice – introduction to the dialog’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 17/4: 266–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joas, H. (1992), Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2007), The Practice of Strategy: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karpik, L. (2010), Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knoblauch, H. (2005), Wissenssoziologie. Konstanz: UVK Verlag.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (1989), ‘Spielarten des Konstruktivismus: einige Notizen und Anmerkungen’, Soziale Welt, 40/1–2: 86–96.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (2002), Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis: Zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft: Erweiterte Neuaissenschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2021), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 1–23.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1974), ‘Second thoughts on paradigms’, in Suppe, F. (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories: 459–82. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langley, A. (2007), ‘Process thinking in strategic organization’, Strategic Organization, 5/3: 271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (1999), Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Law, J. (2004), After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, J. (2008), ‘Actor network theory and material semiotics’, in Turner, B. S. (ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory: 141–58. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Luckmann, T. (1992), ‘Social construction and after’, Perspectives, 15/2: 4–5.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1986), ‘The autopoiesis of social systems’, in Geyer, F., and van der Zouwen, J. (eds), Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Observation, Control and Evolution of Self-Steering Systems: 176–92. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1996), Social Systems. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (2002), Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag.Google Scholar

Lury, C. and Wakeford, N. (eds) (2012), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantere, S. (2005), ‘Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity’, Strategic Organization, 3/2: 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1987), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (1971), ‘Managerial work: analysis from observation’, Management Science, 18/2: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (2009), Managing. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. and McHugh, A. (1985), ‘Strategy formation in an adhocracy’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30/2: 160–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mirabeau, L., Maguire, S. and Hardy, C. (2018), ‘Bridging practice and process research to study transient manifestations of strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 582–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mol, A. (1999), ‘Ontological politics: a word and some questions’, in Law, J., and Hassard, J. (eds), Actor Network Theory and After: 74–89. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000), ‘Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations’, Organization Science, 11/4: 404–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (2002), ‘Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributive organizing’, Organization Science, 13/3: 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettigrew, A. M. (1985), The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pettigrew, A. M. (1987), ‘Context and action in the transformation of the firm’, Journal of Management Studies 24/6: 649–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Régner, P. (2003), ‘Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, R. (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouleau, L. (2013), ‘L’ethnographie organisationnelle d’hier à Demain’, Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, S: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rüegg-Stürm, J. and Grand, S. (2014), Das St Galler Management-Modell. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar

Rumelt, R. (2011), Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar

Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003), ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2005), ‘Practice mind-ed orders’, in Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., and Savigny, E. von (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory: 50–63. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schütz, A. (1932), Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schütz, A. (1967 [1932]), The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Seidl, D. (2007), ‘General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic-discursive perspective’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seidl, D., Grossmann-Hensel, B. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2021), ‘Strategy as practice and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L., et al. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 481–500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soeffner, H.-G. (1989), Auslegung des Alltags – Der Alltag der Auslegung: zur wissenssoziologischen Konzeption einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Hermeneutik. Frankfurt a.K.: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft.Google Scholar

Spender, J. C. (1996), ‘Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S2: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Splitter, V. and Seidl, D. (2011), ‘Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47/1: 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suchman, L. (1987), Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human–Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1985), Philosophical Papers, vol. I, Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thévenot, L. (2001), ‘Pragmatic régimes governing the engagement with the world’, in Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., and Savigny, E. von (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory: 56–73. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thévenot, L. (2006), L’action au pluriel: Sociologie des régimes d’engagement. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (1996), ‘The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S2: 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2005), Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002), ‘On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change’, Organization Science, 13/5: 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (2002), ‘The conduct of strategy research’, in Pettigrew, A. M., Thomas, H., and Whittington, R. (eds), Handbook of Strategy and Management: 411–35. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Foerster, H. (1981), Observing Systems, Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.Google Scholar

Wacquant, L. (2022), Body & Soul: Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Walzer, M. (1988), The Company of Critics: Social Criticism and Political Commitment in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Watzlawick, P. (ed.) (1984), The Invented Reality: How Do We Know What We Believe We Know? New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Werle, F. and Seidl, D. (2015), ‘The layered materiality of strategizing: epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics’, British Journal of Management, 26: S67–S89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westley, F. (1990), ‘Middle managers and strategy: microdynamics of inclusion’, Strategic Management Journal, 11/5: 337–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittington, R. (1996), ‘Strategy as practice’, Long Range Planning, 29/5: 731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittington, R. (2007), ‘Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye’, Organization Studies, 28/10: 1575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittington, R. (2018), ‘Greatness takes practice: on practice theory’s relevance to “Great Strategy”’, Strategy Science, 3/1: 343–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittington, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Mayer, M., Mounoud, E., Nahapiet, J. and Rouleau, L. (2003), ‘Taking strategy seriously responsibility and reform for an important social practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12/4: 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abdallah, C. and Langley, A. (2014), ‘The double edge of ambiguity in strategic planning’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 235–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackermann, F. and Maytorena-Sanchez, E. (2023), ‘Increasing the effectiveness of project management: using causal mapping to integrate risk, uncertainty, and stakeholders’, in Winch, G. M., Brunet, M. and Cao, Dongping (eds), Research Handbook on Complex Project Organizing: 264–73. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Argyris, C., Putnam, R. and Smith, D. M. (1985), Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Astley, W. G. and Zammuto, R. F. (1992), ‘Organization science, managers, and language games’, Organization Science, 3/4: 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balogun, J., Huff, A. S. and Johnson, P. (2003), ‘Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barley, S. R. (2016), ‘60th anniversary essay: ruminations on how we became a mystery house and how we might get out’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61/1: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettis, R. A., Helfat, C. E. and Shaver, J. M. (2016), ‘The necessity, logic, and forms of replication’, Strategic Management Journal, 37/11: 2193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourgoin, A. and Harvey, J.-F. (2018), ‘Professional image under threat: dealing with learning–credibility tension’, Human Relations, 71/12: 1611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourgoin, A., Bencherki, N. and Faraj, S. (2020), ‘“And who are you?”: a performative perspective on authority in organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 63/4: 1134–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, C. (1995), ‘Strategy workshops and top-team commitment to strategic change’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10/8: 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bromiley, P. and Rau, D. (2014), ‘Towards a practice-based view of strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 35/8: 1249–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryson, J. M. (2022), ‘The future of strategizing by public and nonprofit organizations’, Political Science & Politics, 54/1: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bürgi, P. T., Jacobs, C. D. and Roos, J. (2005), ‘From metaphor to practice in the crafting of strategy’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 14/1: 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calori, R. (2002), ‘Real time/real space research: connecting action and reflection in organization studies’, Organization Studies, 23/6: 877–83.Google Scholar

Carlile, P. R. (2002), ‘A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development’, Organization Science, 13/4: 442–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlile, P. R. (2004), ‘Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries’, Organization Science, 15/5: 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlile, P. R. and Christensen, C. M. (2005), The Cycles of Theory Building in Management Research, Working Paper no. 05–057. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar

Carlson, K. D. and Hatfield, D. E. (2004), ‘Strategic management research and the cumulative knowledge perspective’, in Ketchen, D. J., and Bergh, D. D. (eds), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, vol. I: 273–301. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A. and Sanders, W. G. (2004), ‘Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition’, Journal of Management, 30/6: 749–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, B., Levy, L. and Richmond, D. (2008), ‘Leadership as practice: challenging the competency paradigm’, Leadership, 4/4: 363–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Certo, S. T., Lester, R. H., Dalton, C. M. and Dalton, D. R. (2006), ‘Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: a meta-analytic examination’, Journal of Management Studies, 43/4: 813–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, S. (2001), ‘Why sociology doesn’t make progress like the natural sciences’, in Cole, S. (ed.), What’s Wrong with Sociology?: 37–60. Edison, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Cook, S. D. and Brown, J. S. (1999), ‘Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing’, Organization Science, 10/4: 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, R. and Fox, S. (1990), ‘The “texture” of organizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 27/6: 575–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, G. F. (2010), ‘Do theories of organizations progress?’, Organizational Research Methods, 13/4: 690–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, J. A. (2001), ‘What’s wrong with sociology?’, in Cole, S. (ed.), What’s Wrong with Sociology?: 99–120. Edison, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Di Stefano, G. and Gutierrez, C. (2019), ‘Under a magnifying glass: on the use of experiments in strategy research’, Strategic Organization, 17/4: 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobusch, L., Dobusch, L. and Müller-Seitz, G. (2019), ‘Closing for the benefit of openness? The case of Wikimedia’s open strategy process’, Organization Studies, 40/3: 343–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durand, R., Grant, R. M. and Madsen, T. L. (2017), ‘The expanding domain of strategic management research and the quest for integration’, Strategic Management Journal, 38/1: 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. (1998), Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2008), ‘Strategy as discourse in a global retailer: a supplement to rationalist and interpretive accounts’, Organization Studies, 29/2: 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011), ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’, Organization Science, 22/5: 1240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48/1: 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D. C. (1996), Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Educational Publishing.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C. and Cannella, A. A. (2009), Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

George, B., Walker, R. M. and Monster, J. (2019), ‘Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta‐analysis’, Public Administration Review, 79/6: 810–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gherardi, S. (2006), Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. C. (2004), ‘The disintegration of strategic management: it’s time to consolidate our gains’, Strategic Organization, 2/1: 91–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hambrick, D. C. (2007), ‘The field of management’s devotion to theory: too much of a good thing?’, Academy of Management Journal, 50/6: 1346–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A. (1984), ‘Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers’, Academy of Management Review, 9/2: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hautz, J., Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2017), ‘Open strategy: dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics’, Long Range Planning, 50/3: 298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Healey, M. P., Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R. and Johnson, G. (2015), ‘Off to plan or out to lunch? Relationships between design characteristics and outcomes of strategy workshops’, British Journal of Management, 26/3: 507–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, J. and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heracleous, L. and Jacobs, C. D. (2008), ‘Understanding organizations through embodied metaphors’, Organization Studies, 29/1: 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herepath, A. (2014), ‘In the loop: a realist approach to structure and agency in the practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 35/6: 857–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgkinson, G. P. and Wright, G. (2002), ‘Confronting strategic inertia in a top management team: learning from failure’, Organization Studies, 23/6: 949–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgkinson, G. P. and Wright, G. (2006), ‘Neither completing the practice turn, nor enriching the process tradition: secondary misinterpretations of a case analysis reconsidered’, Organization Studies, 27/12: 1895–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., Johnson, G. and Schwarz, M. (2006), ‘The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: formality, communication, co-ordination and inclusion’, Long Range Planning, 39/5: 479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Homberg, F. and Bui, H. T. (2013), ‘Top management team diversity: a systematic review’, Group and Organization Management, 38/4: 455–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, C. D., Oliver, D. and Heracleous, L. (2013), ‘Diagnosing organizational identity beliefs by eliciting complex, multimodal metaphors’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49/4: 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. (2004), ‘Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use’, Organization Studies, 25/4: 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. (2008), ‘Shaping strategy as a structuration process’, Academy of Management Journal, 51/4: 621–50.Google Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. and Bednarek, R. (2018), ‘Toward a social practice theory of relational competing’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 794–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. and Kaplan, S. (2015), ‘Strategy tools-in-use: a framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice’, Strategic Management Journal, 36/4: 537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2008), ‘The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 29/11: 1391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R. and Spee, P. (2015), Making a Market for Acts of God: The Practice of Risk-Trading in the Global Reinsurance Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2/3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., Chalkias, K. and Cacciatori, E. (2019), ‘Exploring inter-organizational paradoxes: methodological lessons from a study of a grand challenge’, Strategic Organization, 17/1:120–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., Chalkias, K. and Cacciatori, E. (2022), ‘Enabling rapid financial response to disasters: knotting and reknotting multiple paradoxes in interorganizational systems’, Academy of Management Journal, 65/5: 1477–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, G., Prashantham, S., Floyd, S. and Bourque, N. (2010), ‘The ritualization of strategy workshops’, Organization Studies, 31/12: 1589–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013), ‘Temporal work in strategy making’, Organization Science, 24/4: 965–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kilduff, M. (2007), ‘Celebrating thirty years of theory publishing in AMR: award-winning articles from the first two decades revisited’, Academy of Management Review, 32/2: 332–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, E., Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2018), ‘The power of PowerPoint: a visual perspective on meaning making in strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 894–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy‐as‐practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornberger, M. and Clegg, S. (2011), ‘Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030’, Strategic Organization, 9/2: 136–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kouamé, S. and Langley, A. (2018), ‘Relating microprocesses to macro‐outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research’, 39/3: 559–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laine, P.-M. and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langley, A. (2007), ‘Process thinking in strategic organization’, Strategic Organization, 5/3: 271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. B. and Phillips, N. (2019), Constructing Organizational Life: How Social-Symbolic Work Shapes Selves, Organizations, and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorino, P. (2018), Pragmatism and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ma, S. and Seidl, D. (2018), ‘New CEOs and their collaborators: divergence and convergence between the strategic leadership constellation and the top management team’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 606–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacIntosh, R. and MacLean, D. (1999), ‘Conditioned emergence: a dissipative structures approach to transformation’, Strategic Management Journal, 20/4: 297–316.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacIntosh, R., MacLean, D. and Seidl, D. (2010), ‘Unpacking the effectivity paradox of strategy workshops: do strategy workshops produce strategic change?’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 291–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantere, S. (2008), ‘Role expectations and middle manager strategic agency’, Journal of Management Studies, 45/2: 294–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKinley, W. (2007), ‘Managing knowledge in organization studies through instrumentation’, Organization, 14/1: 123–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mezias, S. J. and Regnier, M. O. (2007), ‘Walking the walk as well as talking the talk: replication and the normal science paradigm in strategic management research’, Strategic Organization, 5/3: 283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, D. (2007), ‘Paradigm prison, or in praise of atheoretic research’, Strategic Organization, 5/2: 177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

NeelyJr, B. H., Lovelace, J. B., Cowen, A. P. and Hiller, N. J. (2020), ‘Metacritiques of upper echelons theory: verdicts and recommendations for future research’, Journal of Management, 46/6: 1029–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicolini, D. (2012), Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Oliver, D. and Roos, J. (2007), ‘Beyond text: constructing organizational identity multimodally’, British Journal of Management, 18/4: 342–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orr, J. E. (1996), Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar

Oxley, J. E., Rivkin, J. W. and Ryall, M. D. (2010), ‘The strategy research initiative: recognizing and encouraging high-quality research in strategy’, Strategic Organization, 8/4: 377–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelz, D. C. (1978), ‘Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy’, in Yinger, M. J., and Cutler, S. J. (eds), Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View: 346–57. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, J. (1993), ‘Barriers to the advance of organizational science: paradigm development as a dependent variable’, Academy of Management Review, 18/4: 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeffer, J. (2007), ‘A modest proposal: how we might change the process and product of managerial research’, Academy of Management Journal, 50/6: 1334–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Pozzebon, M. (2004), ‘The influence of a structurationist view on strategic management research’, Journal of Management Studies, 41/2: 247–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reckwitz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, R. (1980), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouleau, L. (2013), ‘Strategy-as-practice research at a crossroads’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 574–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouleau, L. and Cloutier, C. (2022), ‘It’s strategy. But is it practice? Desperately seeking social practice in strategy-as-practice research’, Strategic Organization, 20/4: 722–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samba, C., Tabesh, P., Thanos, I. C. and Papadakis, V. M. (2021), ‘Method in the madness? A meta-analysis on the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness’, Strategic Organization, 19/3: 414–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schwarz, M. and Balogun, J. (2007), Strategy Workshops for Strategic Reviews: A Case of Semi-Structured Emergent Dialogues, Working Paper no. 054. London: AIM Research.Google Scholar

Seidl, D. (2007), ‘General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic-discursive perspective’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seidl, D., MacLean, D. and MacIntosh, R. (2011), ‘Rules of suspension: a rules-based explanation of strategy workshops in strategy process’, paper presented at seventy-first annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, Texas, 15 August.Google Scholar

Skov, M. B., Bjerregaard, T. and Hansen, J. R. (2022), ‘Orchestrating ongoing interaction flows of strategy formation in and between meetings,’ Strategic Organization, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14761270221127881.Google Scholar

Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T. and Spee, P. (2015), ‘Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice’, Academy of Management Journal, 58/3: 932–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spee, P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2011), ‘Strategic planning as communicative process’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Splitter, V. and Seidl, D. (2011), ‘Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47/1: 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar