Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-44mx8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-17T22:17:53.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: What Is Strategy as Practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2025

By
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Edited by
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
emlyon Business School
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Strategy as Practice (SAP) has emerged as a distinctive approach for studying strategic management, strategic decision-making, strategizing, strategy-making and strategy work (Jarzabkowski, Balogun and Seidl 2007; Johnson, Melin and Whittington 2003; Whittington 1996). In recent years, SAP research has become more popular than ever (Jarzabkowski, Seidl and Balogun 2022; Kohtamäki et al. 2022). SAP provides not only an organizational perspective into strategic decision-making but also a strategic angle for examining the process of organizing, and thereby it serves as a research programme and social movement for connecting contemporary strategic management research with organizational studies. This third edition of the Handbook offers an updated and forward-looking reflection about what we have learned and how to make the most out of this powerful perspective in future research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 1 - 22
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abdallah, C., Basque, J. and Rouleau, L. (2018), ‘Designing strategy as practice research’ in Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A. L., and Grandy, G. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods: 328–344. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C. and Burton-Taylor, S. (2007), ‘Inter-team coordination activities as a source of customer satisfaction’, Human Relations, 60/1: 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmuss, B. and Oshima, S. (2012), ‘Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences’, Discourse Studies, 14/1: 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle managers sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2005), ‘From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking’, Organization Studies, 26/11: 1573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Rouleau, L. (2017), ‘Strategy-as-practice research on middle managers and sensemaking’, in Floyd, S. W., and Woolridge, B. (eds), Handbook of Middle Management Strategy Process Research: 109–32. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Balogun, J., Huff, A. S. and Johnson, P. (2003), ‘Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, D. and Elmes, M. (1997), ‘Strategy retold: toward a narrative view of strategic discourse’, Academy of Management Review, 22/2: 429–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beech, N. and Johnson, P. (2005), ‘Discourses of disrupted identities in the practice of strategic change’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18/1: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1994), Raisons Pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourque, N. and Johnson, G. (2008), ‘Strategy workshops and “Away-Days” as ritual’, in Hodgkinson, G., and Starbuck, W. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making: 552–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. D. and Thompson, E. R. (2013), ‘A narrative approach to strategy-as-practice’, Business History, 55/7: 1143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1991), ‘Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation’, Organization Science, 2/1: 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgelman, R. A. (1983), ‘A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28/2: 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgelman, R. A., Floyd, S. W., Laamanen, T., Mantere, S., Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2018), ‘Strategy processes and practices: dialogues and intersections’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 531–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Hunt, C. (2007), ‘Complexity in practice’, Human Relations, 60/5: 793–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C. (2013), ‘The age of strategy: strategy, organizations and society’, Business History, 55/7: 1047–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C. R., Clegg, S. and Kornberger, M. (2008), ‘Strategy as practice?’, Strategic Organization, 6/1: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C. R., Clegg, S. and Kornberger, M. (2010), ‘Re‐framing strategy: power, politics and accounting’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23/5: 573–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Certeau, M. (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2023), ‘Strategy, Intentionality and success: four logics for explaining strategic action’ Organization Theory, 4/3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. R., Carter, C. and Kornberger, M. (2004), ‘Get up, I feel like being a strategy machine’, European Management Review, 1/1: 21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornut, F., Giroux, H. and Langley, A. (2012), ‘The strategic plan as a genre’, Discourse & Communication, 6/1: 21–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daigle, P. and Rouleau, L. (2010), ‘Strategic plans in arts organizations: a compromising tool between artistic and managerial values’, International Journal of Arts Management, 12/3: 13–30.Google Scholar
Dameron, S. and Torset, C. (2014), ‘The discursive construction of strategists’ subjectivities: towards a paradox lens on strategy’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dameron, S., Lê, J. K. and LeBaron, C. (2015), ‘Materializing strategy and strategizing materials: why matter matters’, British Journal of Management, 26/1: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J. L., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2007), ‘Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames’, Human Relations, 60/1: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J.–L., Dompierre, G., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2011), ‘Escalating indecision: between reification and strategic ambiguity’, Organization Science, 22/1: 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938), Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Dick, P. and Collings, D. G. (2014), ‘Discipline and punish? Strategy discourse, senior manager subjectivity and contradictory power effects’, Human Relations, 67/12: 1513–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobusch, L. and Kapeller, J. (2018), ‘Open strategy-making with crowds and communities: comparing Wikimedia and Creative Commons’, Long Range Planning, 51/4: 561–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (1991), Being-in-the-World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. (1989), ‘Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments’, Academy of Management Journal, 32/3: 543–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamäki, R-L. (eds) (1999), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2008), ‘Strategy as discourse in a global retailer: a supplement to rationalist and interpretive accounts’, Organization Studies, 29/2: 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2010), ‘Strategy and strategizing: a poststructuralist perspective’, Advances in Strategic Management, 27: 29–50.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003), Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauré, B. and Rouleau, L. (2011), ‘The strategic competence of accountants and middle managers in budget making’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36/3: 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011), ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’, Organization Science, 22/5: 1240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, C. and Langley, A. (2011), ‘Strategy as practice and the narrative turn’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, S., Cornelissen, J., Wright, M. and Delios, A. (2011), ‘Processes and practices of strategizing and organizing: review: development, and the role of bridging and umbrella constructs’, Journal of Management Studies, 48/5: 933–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980a), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980b). Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A. and Chittipeddi, K. (1991), ‘Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation’, Strategic Management Journal, 12/6: 433–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérard, S., Langley, A. and Seidl, D. (2013), ‘Rethinking the concept of performance in strategy research: towards a performativity perspective’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 566–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gylfe, P., Franck, H., Lebaron, C. and Mantere, S. (2016), ‘Video methods in strategy research: focusing on embodied cognition’, Strategic Management Journal, 37/1: 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hällgren, M., Rouleau, L. and de Rond, M. (2018), ‘A matter of life or death: how extreme context research matters for management and organization studies’, Academy of Management Annals, 12/1: 111–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C. and Thomas, R. (2014), ‘Strategy, discourse and practice: the intensification of power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 320–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2017), ‘Open strategy: dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics’, Long Range Planning, 50/3: 298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, M. P., Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R. and Johnson, G. (2015), ‘Off to plan or out to lunch? Relationships between design characteristics and outcomes of strategy workshops’, British Journal of Management, 26/3: 507–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. (2000), ‘Strategic decision making, discourse and strategy as social practice’, Journal of Management Studies, 37/7: 955–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, K. P., Kiel, G. C. and Nicholson, G. (2010), ‘How boards strategise? A strategy as practice view’, Long Range Planning, 43/1: 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heracleous, L. and Jacobs, C. D. (2008), ‘Understanding organizations through embodied metaphors’, Organizations Studies, 29/1: 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herepath, A. (2014), ‘In the loop: a realist approach to structure and agency in the practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 35/6: 857–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G., Whittington, R., Johnson, G. and Schwarz, M. (2006), ‘The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: formality, communication, co-ordination and inclusion’, Long Range Planning, 39/5: 479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoon, C. (2007), ‘Committees as strategic practice: the role of strategic conversation in a public administration’, Human Relations, 60/6: 921–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J. (2021), ‘Grand challenges, covid-19 and the future of organizational scholarship’, Journal of Management Studies, 58/1: 254–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, A. S., Neyer, A.–K. and Möslein, K. (2010), ‘Broader methods to support new insights into strategizing’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 201–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hydle, K. M. (2015), ‘Temporal and spatial dimensions of strategizing’, Organization Studies, 36/5: 643–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2003), ‘Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004), ‘Strategy as practice: recursive, adaptive and practices-in-use’, Organization Studies, 25/4: 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity Based Approach. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2008), ‘Shaping strategy as a structuration process’, Academy of Management Journal, 51/4: 621–50.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Balogun, J. (2009), ‘The practice and process of delivering integration through strategic planning’, Journal of Management Studies, 46/8: 1255–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Kaplan, S. (2015), ‘Strategy tools‐in‐use: a framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice’, Strategic Management Journal, 36/4: 537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2008), ‘The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 29/11: 1391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, A. P. (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Wilson, D. C. (2002), ‘Top teams and strategy in a UK university’, Journal of Management Studies, 39/3: 355–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Wilson, D. C. (2006), ‘Actionable strategy knowledge: a practice perspective’, European Management Journal, 24/3: 348–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R. and Cabantous, L. (2015), ‘Conducting global team-based ethnography: methodological challenges and practical methods’, Human Relations, 68/1: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2/3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Matthiesen, J. and van de Ven, A. (2009), ‘Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism’, in Lawrence, T., Leca, B., and Suddaby, R. (eds), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations: 284–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: Two decades of strategy-as-practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, P. and Smets, M. (2013), ‘Material artifacts: practices for doing strategy with “stuff”’, European Management Journal, 31/1: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., Kilminster, W. and Spee, P. (2022), ‘An integrative approach to investigating longstanding organisational phenomena: opportunities for practice theorists and historians’, Business History, 65/3: 414–22.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. and Huff, A. S. (1998), ‘Everyday innovation and everyday strategy’, in Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K., Thomas, H., and O’Neal, D. (eds), Strategic Flexibility: Managing in a Turbulent Environment: 3–27. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editor’s introduction – Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013), ‘Temporal work in strategy making’, Organization Science, 24/4: 965–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzberg, G. (2013), ‘Separation and reconnection episodic organizational arenas in the strategic process’, Journal of Strategy and Management, 6/3: 212–28.Google Scholar
King, B. (2008), ‘Strategizing at leading venture capital firms: of planning, opportunism and deliberate emergence’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, E. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2022), ‘Presenting as a chief strategy officer: a discourse-analytical study of elite subjectivities and vulnerabilities’, Human Relations, doi:10.1177/00187267221099773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, E., Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2018), ‘The power of PowerPoint: a visual perspective on meaning making in strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 894–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organisations and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy‐as‐practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. and Clegg, S. (2011), ‘Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030’, Strategic Organization, 9/2: 136–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. and Vaara, E. (2022), ‘Strategy as engagement: what organization strategy can learn from military strategy’, Long Range Planning, 55/4: 102125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouamé, S. and Langley, A. (2018), ‘Relating microprocesses to macro‐outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 559–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouamé, S. and Liu, F. (2021), ‘Capturing emotions in qualitative strategic organization research’, Strategic Organization, 19/1: 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, W., Clarke, I. and Wodak, R. (2014), ‘Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 265–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, P.–M. and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, P. M., Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J. and Vaara, E. (2016), ‘Mastery, submission, and subversion: on the performative construction of strategist identity’, Organization, 23/4: 505–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, A. (1989), ‘In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34/4: 598–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, F. and Maitlis, S. (2014), ‘Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: a study of strategic conversations in top team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 202–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M. and Crumley, E. (2007), ‘New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation’, Organization Studies, 28/7: 993–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. A. and Spee, P. (2021), On Practice and Institution: New Empirical Directions, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 71. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Ma, S. and Seidl, D. (2018), ‘New CEOs and their collaborators: divergence and convergence between the strategic leadership constellation and the top management team’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 606–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, S., Seidl, D. and Guérard, S. (2015), ‘The new CEO and the post‐succession process: an integration of past research and future directions’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 17/4: 460–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, R., MacLean, D. and Seidl, D. (2010), ‘Unpacking the effectivity paradox of strategy workshops: Do strategy workshops produce strategic change?’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 291–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, B., Chia, R. and Nair, A. K. (2021), ‘Strategy-in-practices: a process philosophical approach to understanding strategy emergence and organizational outcomes’, Human Relations, 74/9: 1337–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitlis, S. and Lawrence, T. B. (2003), ‘Orchestral manoeuvres in the dark: understanding failure in organizational strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. (2005), ‘Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity’, Strategic Organization, 3/2: 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. (2008), ‘Role expectations and middle managers strategic agency’, Journal of Management Studies, 45/2: 294–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19 /2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Whittington, R. (2021), ‘Becoming a strategist: the roles of strategy discourse and ontological security in managerial identity work’, Strategic Organization, 19/4: 553–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. (2003), ‘Feminist theory and critical theory: unexplored synergies’, Studying Management Critically, 1/3: 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, D. (2010), ‘Strategy-as-power: ambiguity, contradiction and the exercise of power in a UK building society’, Organization, 17/ 2: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. (1985), ‘Of strategies deliberate and emergent’, Strategic Management Journal, 6/3: 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Théoret, A. (1976), ‘The structure of “Unstructured” decision processes’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21/2: 246–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molloy, E. and Whittington, R. (2005), ‘Practices of organizing: inside and outside the processes of change’, in Szulanski, G., Porac, J., and Doz, Y. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management: Strategy Process: 491–515. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, F., Whittle, A., Gilchrist, A. and Lenney, P. (2013), ‘Politics and strategy practice: an ethnomethodologically-informed discourse analysis perspective’, Business History, 55/7: 1168–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeley, T. B. and Leonardi, P. M. (2018), ‘Enacting knowledge strategy through social media: passable trust and the paradox of nonwork interactions’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 922–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyland, D. and Whittle, A. (2018), ‘Garfinkel on strategy: using ethnomethodology to make sense of “rubbish strategy”’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 53: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2011), ‘Practice as the site of knowing: insights from the field of telemedicine’, Organization Science, 22/3: 602–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2012), Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D. and Mengis, J. (2023), ‘Towards a practice-theoretical view of the situated nature of attention’, Strategic Organization, https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270231183731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (2003), Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Nordqvist, M. and Melin, L. (2008), ‘Strategic planning champions: social craftspersons, artful interpreters and known strangers’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 326–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B. and Cooper, D. J. (1998), ‘Business planning as pedagogy: language and control in a changing institutional field’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43/2: 257–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocasio, W., Laamanen, T. and Vaara, E. (2018), ‘Communication and attention dynamics: an attention‐based view of strategic change’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/1: 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000), ‘Using technology and constituting structures’, Organization Science, 11/4: 404–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, S. B. (2006), Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power and the Acting Subject. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pälli, P., Vaara, E. and Sorsa, V. (2009), ‘Strategy as text and discursive practice: a genre-based approach to strategizing in city administration’, Discourse & Communication, 3/3: 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paroutis, S. and Pettigrew, A. (2007), ‘Strategizing in the multi-business firm: strategy teams at multiple levels and over time’, Human Relations, 60/1: 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paroutis, S., Franco, L. A. and Papadopoulos, T. (2015), ‘Visual interactions with strategy tools: producing strategic knowledge in workshops’, British Journal of Management, 26: 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1973), The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Phillips, N., Sewell, G. and Jaynes, S. (2008), ‘Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research’, Organizational Research Methods, 11/4: 770–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, C. F., Durocher, S. and Gendron, Y. (2020), ‘Office design processes, strategizing and time intermingling: an agenda to shape spaces and minds in public accounting firms’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33/5: 1143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasche, A. and Chia, R. (2009), ‘Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective’, Organization Studies, 30/7: 713–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2003), ‘Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2008), ‘Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: steps towards a dynamic view of strategy’, Human Relations, 61/4: 565–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2003), ‘Micro-Strategy as Gendered Practice: Resisting Strategic Change through the Family Metaphor’, Paper presented at the 19th EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1414–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2013), ‘Strategy-as-practice research at a crossroads’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 547–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2022), Organization Theories in the Making: Exploring the Leading-Edge Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. and Balogun, J. (2011). ‘Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence’, Journal of Management Studies, 48/5: 953–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. and Cloutier, C. (2022), ‘It’s strategy. But is it practice? Desperately seeking social practice in strategy-as-practice research’, Strategic Organization, 20/4: 722–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L., Balogun, J. and Floyd, S. (2015), ‘Strategy-as-practice research on middle managers’ strategy work’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 598–615. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003), ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2004), ‘Understanding the production of “strategy” and “organization” through talk amongst managerial elites’, Culture and Organization, 10/2: 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2005), ‘Strategic practice, “discourse” and the everyday interactional constitution of “power effects”’, Organization, 12/6: 803–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2002), The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, M. (2004), ‘Knowing in practice: how consultants work with clients to create, share and apply knowledge’, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2004/1: D1–D9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. (2007), ‘General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systematic–discursive perspective’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. and Werle, F. (2018), ‘Inter‐organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta‐problems: requisite variety and dynamics of participation’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 830–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies’, Organization Studies, 35/10: 1407–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2021), ‘How crisis reveals the structures of practices’, Journal of Management Studies, 58/1: 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D., Grossmann-Hensel, B. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2021), ‘Strategy as practice and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Pentland, B. T., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 481–500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillince, J. and Mueller, F. (2007), ‘Switching strategic perspective: the reframing of accounts of responsibility’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, A. P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2009), ‘Strategy tools as boundary objects’, Strategic Organization, 7/2: 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, A. P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2011), ‘Strategic planning as communicative process’, Organizational Studies, 32/9: 1217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Splitter, V., Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2021), ‘Middle managers’ struggle over their subject position in Open Strategy processes’, Journal of Management Studies, 60/7: 1884–923.Google Scholar
Stensaker, I. and Falkenberg, J. (2007), ‘Making sense of different responses to corporate change’, Human Relations, 60/1: 137–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R., Seidl, D. and Lê, J. K. (2013), ‘Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory’, Strategic Organization, 11/3: 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sztompka, P. (1991), Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Tavella, E. (2021), ‘The discursive construction of participation: assigning and justifying responsibility in management meetings’, Strategic Organization, 19/4: 579–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teulier, R. and Rouleau, L. (2013), ‘Middle managers’ sensemaking and interorganizational change initiation: translation spaces and editing practices’, Journal of Change Management, 13/3: 308–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R., Sargent, L. D. and Hardy, C. (2011), ‘Managing organizational change: negotiating meaning and power-resistance relations’, Organization Science, 22/1: 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toegel, I., Levy, O. and Jonsen, K. (2022), ‘Secrecy in practice: how middle managers promote strategic initiatives behind the scenes’, Organization Studies, 43/6: 885–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, R. (2005), The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaara, E. (2010), ‘Taking the linguistic turn seriously: strategy as multifaceted and interdiscursive phenomenon’, Advances in Strategic Management, 27: 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Lamberg, J. A. (2016), ‘Taking historical embeddedness seriously: three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research’, Academy of Management Review, 41/4: 633–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Pedersen, A. R. (2014), ‘Strategy and chronotopes: a Bakhtinian perspective on the construction of strategy narratives’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Rantakari, A. (2023), ‘How orchestration both generates and smothers polyphony in narrative strategy-making’, Organization Studies, Online July 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Kleymann, B. and Seristö, H. (2004), ‘Strategies as discursive constructions: the case of Airline Alliances’, Journal of Management Studies, 41/1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Sorsa, V. and Pälli, P. (2010), ‘On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plans and its power effects in a city organization’, Organization, 17/6: 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkateswaran, R. and Prabhu, G. N. (2010), ‘Taking stock of research methods in strategy as practice’, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8/2: 156–62.Google Scholar
Vesa, M. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Strategic ethnography 2.0: four methods for advancing strategy process and practice research’, Strategic Organization, 12/4: 288–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Arx, W. (2008), Die dynamische Verfertigung von Strategie: Rekonstruktion organisationaler Praktiken und Kontexte eines Universitätsspitals. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft (MWV).Google Scholar
Vuori, N., Vuori, T. O. and Huy, Q. N. (2018), ‘Emotional practices: how masking negative emotions impacts the post‐acquisition integration process’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 859–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuorinen, T., Hakala, H., Kohtamäki, M. and Uusitalo, K. (2018), ‘Mapping the landscape of strategy tools: a review on strategy tools published in leading journals within the past 25 years’, Long Range Planning, 51/4: 586–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Werle, F. and Seidl, D. (2015), ‘The layered materiality of strategizing: epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics’, British Journal of Management, 26: 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M. and Koch, J. (2018), ‘Strategy as staged performance: a critical discursive perspective on keynote speeches as a genre of strategic communication’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 639–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (1996), ‘Strategy as practice’, Long Range Planning, 29/5: 731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2007), ‘Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye’, Organization Studies, 28/10: 1575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2011), ‘The practice turn in organization research: a disciplined transdisciplinarity’, Accounting, Organization and Society, 36/3: 183–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Information systems strategy and strategy-as-practice: a joint agenda’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23/1: 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2019), Opening Strategy: Professional Strategists and Practice Change, 1960 to Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. and Cailluet, L. (2008), ‘The crafts of strategy: introduction to special issue’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Mayer, M., Mounoud, E., Nahapiet, J. and Rouleau, L. (2003), ‘Taking strategy seriously: responsibility and reform for an important social practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12/4: 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Molloy, E., Mayer, M. and Smith, A. (2006), ‘Practices of strategizing/organizing, broadening strategy work and skills’, Long Range Planning, 39/6: 615–29.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., Housley, W., Gilchrist, A., Mueller, F. and Lenney, P. (2014). ‘Power, politics and organizational communication: an ethnomethodological perspective’, in Cooren, F., Vaara, E., Langley, A., and Tsoukas, H. (eds), Perspectives on Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., Gilchrist, A., Mueller, F. and Lenney, P. (2021), ‘The art of stage-craft: a dramaturgical perspective on strategic change’, Strategic Organization, 19/4: 636–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1951), Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., Kwon, W. and Clarke, I. (2011), ‘“Getting people on board”: discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings’, Discourse & Society, 22/5: 592–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R. P., Paroutis, S. E. and Blettner, D. P. (2013), ‘How useful are the strategic tools we teach in business schools?’, Journal of Management Studies, 50/1: 92–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×