Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of boxes
- List of contributors
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Introduction: what is strategy as practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- 1 Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy
- 2 Epistemological alternatives for researching strategy as practice: building and dwelling worldviews
- 3 Making strategy: meta-theoretical insights from Heideggerian phenomenology
- 4 Constructivist paradigms: implications for strategy-as-practice research
- 5 Constructing contribution in strategy-as-practice research
- 6 The ongoing challenge of developing cumulative knowledge about strategy as practice
- 7 Practical relevance of practice-based research on strategy
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
4 - Constructivist paradigms: implications for strategy-as-practice research
from Part I - Ontological and Epistemological Questions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of boxes
- List of contributors
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Introduction: what is strategy as practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- 1 Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy
- 2 Epistemological alternatives for researching strategy as practice: building and dwelling worldviews
- 3 Making strategy: meta-theoretical insights from Heideggerian phenomenology
- 4 Constructivist paradigms: implications for strategy-as-practice research
- 5 Constructing contribution in strategy-as-practice research
- 6 The ongoing challenge of developing cumulative knowledge about strategy as practice
- 7 Practical relevance of practice-based research on strategy
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The practice turn in strategy research (Johnson, Melin and Whittington 2003; Johnson et al. 2007; Golsorkhi et al. 2010; Vaara and Whittington 2012) implies an explicit reconsideration of paradigmatic premises (Tsoukas and Knudsen 2002; Feldman and Orlikowski 2011; Vaara and Whittington 2012). The strategy-as-practice research programme challenges concepts of strategy that have long been taken for granted, uncovering the complexities of the ‘social fabric’ of strategy-making (Latour 1996). Furthermore, it undermines the apparently self-evident premises of strategy research and its relation to strategy-making by referring to various constructivist perspectives, theories and methodologies.
Looking at the main contributions to strategy-as-practice research of the last few years, a handful of patterns seem dominant. One can distinguish between three dimensions (Johnson et al. 2007; Orlikowski in this volume). On an empirical level (‘phenomenon’), strategy-making is seen as involving multiple construction processes and activities and multiple actors inside and outside the organization, distributed across multiple organizational layers (Johnson, Melin and Whittington 2003; Jarzabkowski and Spee 2009). While strategies and strategy processes are traditionally treated as defined entities, the strategy-as-practice research programme emphasizes their constructedness, and thus their heterogeneity, processuality and fragility. On a theoretical level (‘perspectives’), the study of strategy-making requires approaches that provide conceptual cover for this heterogeneous mesh of processes, activities and actors, as well as the fact of their situatedness and embeddedness. It is argued that a focus on the practice of strategy-making therefore implies a discussion of the underlying action theories (Grand and MacLean 2007; Jarzabkowski 2004; Tsoukas and Knudsen 2002) and, specifically, theories of practice (Schatzki, Knorr Cetina and von Savigny 2001). On a philosophical level (‘philosophies’), this emphasis on strategy-making as social practice requires a consideration of scientific research itself from the vantage point of practice (Knorr Cetina 2002; Tsoukas 2005). How do scientific research itself and particular research practices contribute to the construction of the field of strategy, both scientifically and organizationally (Knights and Morgan 1991)?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 78 - 94Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
, and (2007), ‘Management accounting as practice’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32/1: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.Google Scholar
(1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
, and (1967), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
, and (1991), De la justification: Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
(1970), Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
, and (2007), ‘How managers’ everyday decisions create or destroy your company's strategy’, Harvard Business Review, 85/2: 72–9.Google ScholarPubMed
, and (2001), ‘Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective’, Organization Science, 12/2: 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997), ‘The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42/1: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Fading memories: a process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39/1: 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), ‘Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, in (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?: 196–223. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1990), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, and (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1996), ‘Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/3: 197–218.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Engagierte Beobachter: Die Intellektuellen und die Versuchungen der Zeit. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
, , and (2001), ‘The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 44/4: 809–37.Google Scholar
, and (1998), ‘The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23/4: 660–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), ‘A new paradigm for the sociology of knowledge: “the social construction of reality” after 25 years’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 18/2: 493–502.Google Scholar
, and (2013), ‘Leadership practices and context: two sides of the same coin’, Leadership, 9/2: 278–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12/4:727–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2011), ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’, Organization Science, 22/5: 1240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48/1: 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980), Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
, and (2000), ‘Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal’, Academy of Management Review, 25/1: 145–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971), Die Ordnung der Dinge: Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
, and (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
(1995), Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. London: Falmer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (eds.) (2010), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000), ‘Conventions: an interpretation of deep structure in organizations’, Organization Science, 11/6: 696–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Praxisrelevanz versus Praxisbezug der Forschung in der Managementforschung’, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 63/5: 599–604.Google Scholar
(2012), ‘Routines, strategies and management: engaging for recurrent creation “at the edge”’, Habilitation manuscript. University of St Gallen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
, and (2012), ‘Managing knowledge: a process view’, in , , , and (eds.), Constructing Identity in and around Organizations: 261–305. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Researching the practice of strategy as creative action: toward an action theoretics foundation of the research program’, paper presented at the twenty-third European Group for Organizational Studies colloquium, Vienna, 7 July.
(2003), ‘Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors’, Strategic Management Journal, 24/6: 491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1994), ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, in , and (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research: 105–17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
(1931), Cartesianische Meditationen: Eine Einleitung in die Phänomenologie. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use’, Organization Studies, 25/1: 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2007), The Practice of Strategy: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010), ‘Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities’. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘Spielarten des Konstruktivismus: einige Notizen und Anmerkungen’, Soziale Welt, 40/1–2: 86–96.Google Scholar
(2002), Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis: Zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft: Erweiterte Neuaissenschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
(1974), ‘Second thoughts on paradigms’, in (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories: 459–82. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34/4: 598–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1996), ‘On actor–network theory: a few clarifications plus more than a few complications’, Soziale Welt, 47/4: 369–81.Google Scholar
(1999), Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1986), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Actor network theory and material semiotics’, in (ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory: 141–58. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1986), ‘The autopoiesis of social systems’, in , and (eds.), Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Observation, Control and Evolution of Self-Steering Systems: 176–92. London: Sage.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (2012), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
, and (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1987), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
(1971), ‘Managerial work: analysis from observation’, Management Science, 18/2: 97 –110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1985), ‘Strategy formation in an adhocracy’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30/2: 160–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), ‘Ontological politics: a word and some questions’, in , and (eds.), Actor Network Theory and After: 74–89. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations’, Organization Science, 11/4: 404–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributive organizing’, Organization Science, 13/3: 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1994), ‘Genre repertoire: the structuring of communicative practices in organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39/4: 541–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985), The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Context and action in the transformation of the firm’, Journal of Management Studies 24/6: 649–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
, and (1997), ‘Plädoyer für eine Wissenschaftsgeschichte des Experiments’, Theory in Biosciences, 116/1: 11–32.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2014), Das St Galler Management-Modell: 4. Generation: Einführung. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
(2011), Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Peripheral vision: the sites of organizations’, Organization Studies, 26/3: 465–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Comments from the editors: introduction to volume 1’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1/1: 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967 [1932]), The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic-discursive perspective’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), ‘Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S2: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2011), ‘Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47/1: 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
(1987), Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human–Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1985), Philosophical Papers, vol. I, Human Agency and Language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), L'action au pluriel: Sociologie des régimes d'engagement. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.Google Scholar
(1996), ‘The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S2: 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2002), ‘On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change’, Organization Science, 13/5: 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002),‘The conduct of strategy research’, in , , and (eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management: 411–35. London: Sage.Google Scholar
, and (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993),‘Managing the process of organizational innovation’, in , and (eds.), Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance: 269–94. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2003), ‘Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: issues for organization science’, Organization Science, 14/2: 209–23.Google Scholar
(1988), The Company of Critics: Social Criticism and Political Commitment in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1984), The Invented Reality: How Do We Know What We Believe We Know?New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
(1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990), ‘Middle managers and strategy: microdynamics of inclusion’, Strategic Management Journal, 11/5: 337–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), ‘Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye’, Organization Studies, 28/10: 1575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by