Alexeyenko, A. (2015). The Syntax and Semantics of Manner Modification: Adjectives and Adverbs (Doctoral dissertation). University of Osnabrück.Google Scholar

Ambadiang, T. and Camus Bergareche, B. (2000). Morfología verbal del español como L2. In Díaz Hormigo, María Tadea (ed.), IV Congreso de Lingüística General, Cádiz, del 3 al 6 de abril 2000, Vol. 2. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz, pp. 89–102.Google Scholar

Bauer, L. and Valera, S. (2005). Approaches to Conversion / Zero Derivation. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2007a). Morphological Structure and Phonological Domains in Spanish Denominal Derivation. In Martínez-Gil, F. and Colina, S. (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic studies in Spanish Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 278–311.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2007b). Spanish Pseudo-Plurals: Phonological Cues in the Acquisition of a Syntax–Morphology Mismatch. In Baerman, M. et al. (eds.), Deponency and Morphological Mismatches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–269.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2013). The Spanish Lexicon Stores Stems with Theme Vowels, not Roots with Inflectional Class Features. Probus, 25, 3–103.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2016). We Do Not Need Structuralist Morphemes, but We Do Need Constituent Structure. In Siddiqi, D. and Harley, Heidi (eds.), Morphological Metatheory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 387–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after Syntax. Pronominal Clitics in Romance (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

Booij, G. (1996). Inherent vs. Contextual Inflection and the Split Morphology Hypothesis. In Booij, G. and van Maarle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Borer, H. (2013). Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (1999). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar

Buenafuentes de la Mata, C. (2007). Procesos de gramaticalización y lexicalización en la formación de compuestos en español (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar

Burdette, K. (2005). New Paradigms: A Rule-and-Feature Based Morpholexical Model of the Spanish Verbal System. In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 158–168.Google Scholar

Bustos Gisbert, E. (1986). La composición nominal en español. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar

Cabré, T. and Prieto, P. (2007). Exceptional Hiatuses in Spanish. In Martínez-Gil, F. and Colina, S. (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic studies in Spanish Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 205–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caha, P. (2009). The Nanosyntax of Case (Doctoral dissertation). CASTL, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar

Colina, S. (2003). Diminutives in Spanish: A Morphophonological Account. The Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 22, 87–107.Google Scholar

Company Company, C. (1998). The Interplay between Form and Meaning in Language Change: Grammaticalization of Cannibalistic Datives in Spanish. Studies in Language, 22, 529–566.Google Scholar

Cuervo, M. C. (2003). Datives at Large (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

DiSciullo, A.-M. and Williams, E. (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Downing, P. (1977). On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns. Language, 53, 810–842.Google Scholar

Eddington, D. (2005). Spanish Verb Inflection: A Single- or Dual-Route System? Linguistics, 47, 173–199.Google Scholar

Eguren, L. (2002). Evaluative Suffixation in Spanish and the Syntax of Derivational Processes. In Herschensohn, J. et al. (eds.), Features and Interfaces in Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 71–85.Google Scholar

Elvira, J. (1998). El cambio analógico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Embick, D. (2010). Localism vs. Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fábregas, A. (2005). La definición de la categoría gramatical en una morfología orientada sintácticamente (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar

Fábregas, A. (2013). Diminutives as Heads or Specifiers: The Mapping between Syntax and Phonology. Iberia, 5, 1–44.Google Scholar

Fábregas, A. (2014). On a Grammatically Relevant Notion of Word and Why it Belongs to Syntax. In Ibarretxe, I. and Mendívil, J. L. (eds.), To Be or Not To Be a Word. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishers, pp. 93–131.Google Scholar

Felíu, E. and Roca, I. (2003). Morphology in Truncation: The Role of the Spanish Desinence. In Booij, G. and van Maarle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2002. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 197–218.Google Scholar

Fernández-Soriano, O. (1993). Los pronombres átonos. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar

Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111–176.Google Scholar

Harris, J. W. (1991). The Exponence of Gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 27–62.Google Scholar

Harris, J. W. and Halle, M. (2005). Unexpected Plural Inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and Metathesis. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 195–222.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. (2011). The Indeterminacy of Word Segmentation and the Nature of Morphology and Syntax. Folia Linguistica, 45, 31–80.Google Scholar

Jaeggli, O. (1986). Three Issues in the Theory of Clitics: Case, Doubled NPs and Extraction. In Borer, H. (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. New York: Academic, pp. 15–42.Google Scholar

Julien, M. (2007). On the Relation between Morphology and Syntax. In Ramchand, G. and Reiss, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–238.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. (1975). French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lang, M. (1992). Formación de palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar

Marantz, A. (2000). Words (Unpublished MS). MIT.Google Scholar

Martín García, J. (2001). Construcciones morfológicas y construcciones sintácticas: Los prefijos “anti-” y “pro-”. In Veiga, A. et al. (eds.), Lengua española y estructuras gramaticales. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, pp. 225–237.Google Scholar

Mateu, J. and Acedo-Matellán, V. (2015). Parameters and Argument Structure I: Motion Predicates and Resultatives. In Fábregas, A. et al. (eds.), Contemporary Linguistic Parameters. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 99–123.Google Scholar

Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional Morphology, a Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moina, M. I. (2011). Compound Words in Spanish: Theory and History. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Myler, N. (2015). Stem Storage? Not Proved: A Reply to Bermúdez-Otero 2013. Linguistic Inquiry, 46, 173–186.Google Scholar

Oltra-Massuet, I. (1999). On the Constituent Structure of Catalan Verbs. In Arregi, K. et al. (eds.), Papers in Morphology and Syntax, Cycle One. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 279–322.Google Scholar

Oltra-Massuet, I. and Arregi, K. (2005). Stress by Structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 43–84.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. (2012). Clitics in Spanish. In Hualde, J. I. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 423–453.Google Scholar

Ormazábal, J. and Romero, J. (2013). Object Clitics, Agreement and Dialectal Variation. Probus, 25, 301–344.Google Scholar

Pena, J. (1999). Partes de la morfología: Las unidades del análisis morfológico. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 4305–4366.Google Scholar

Piera, C. (1995). On Compounding in English and Spanish. In Campos, H. and Kempchinsky, P. (eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 302–315.Google Scholar

Piera, C. and Varela, S. (1999). Relaciones entre morfología y sintaxis. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 4367–4422.Google Scholar

RAE and ASALE (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar

Rainer, F. (1993). Spanische Wortbildungslehre. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Rainer, F. and Varela, S. (1992). Compounding in Spanish. Rivista di linguistica, 4, 117–142.Google Scholar

Ramchand, G. (2008). First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ruiz Gurillo, L. (2002). Compuestos, colocaciones, locuciones: Intento de delimitación. In Veiga, A. et al. (eds.), Léxico y gramática. Lugo: Tris Tram, pp. 327–339.Google Scholar

Sanz, J. (2015). The Phonology and Morphology of Spanish Hypocoristics (Master’s Thesis). University of Tromsø.Google Scholar

Scalise, S. and Bisetto, A. (2009). The Classification of Compounds. In Lieber, R. and Stekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 34–54.Google Scholar

Serrano Dolader, D. (2010). El género en los sustantivos: ¿flexión y / o derivación? In Val Álvaro, J. F. and Horno, M. C. (eds.), La gramática del sentido. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, pp. 249–269.Google Scholar

Snyder, W. (1995). Language Acquisition and Language Variation (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

Snyder, W. (2012). Parameter Theory and Motion Predicates. In McNally, L. et al. (eds.), Telicity, Change and State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 279–300.Google Scholar

Son, M. and Svenonius, P. (2008). Microparameters of Cross-Linguistic Variation. In Abner, N. and Bishop, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 388–396.Google Scholar

Sportiche, D. (1996). Clitic Constructions. In Zaring, L. and Rooryck, J. (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 213–276.Google Scholar

Stump, G. (1998). Inflection. In Zwicky, A. and Spencer, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. London: Blackwell, pp. 13–43.Google Scholar

Stump, G. (2001). Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Svenonius, P. (2016). Spans and Words. In Siddiqi, Daniel and Harley, Heidi (eds.), Morphological Metatheory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 201–222.Google Scholar

Torner, S. (2003). De los adjetivos calificativos a los adverbios en -mente: Semántica y gramática. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar

Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the Syntax of Clitic Placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 79–124.Google Scholar

Zagona, K. (1990). Mente Adverbs, Compound Interpretation and the Projection Principle. Probus, 2, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel and Serrano, María José (2012). La posición del sujeto pronominal en las cláusulas no declarativas. Onomázein, 26 (2), 131–164.Google Scholar

Alba, Orlando (2004). Cómo hablamos los dominicanos: Un enfoque sociolingüístico. Santo Domingo: Grupo León Jiménez.Google Scholar

Alfaraz, Gabriela G. (2015). Variation of Overt and Null Subject Pronouns in the Spanish of Santo Domingo. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:3–16.Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira (1994). Interpreting Anaphoric Expressions: A Cognitive versus a Pragmatic Approach. Journal of Linguistics, 30, 3–42.Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert, Holland, Cory, and Ware, Kristen (2013). Lexical Frequency and Syntactic Variation: A Test of a Linguistic Hypothesis. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 19 (2), 21–30.Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert and Pease-Álvarez, Lucinda (1996). Null and Expressed Pronoun Variation in Mexican-descent children’s Spanish. In Arnold, Jennifer, Blake, Renee, and Davidson, Brad (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 85–99.Google Scholar

Bentivoglio, Paola (1987). Los sujetos pronominales de primera persona en el habla de Caracas. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela, Consejo de Desarrollo Científico y Humanístico.Google Scholar

Bock, J. K. and Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The Persistence of Structural Priming: Transient Activation or Implicit Learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 129, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bullock, Barbara E. and Toribio, Jacqueline Almeida (2007). Reconsidering Dominican Spanish: Data from the Rural Cibao. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 7 (2), 49–73.Google Scholar

Butt, John and Benjamin, Carmen (2004). A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard (1992). Pronominal and Null Subject Variation in Spanish: Constraints, Dialects, and Functional Compensation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania at Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard (1994). Ambiguous Agreement, Functional Compensation, and Nonspecific tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change, 5 (3), 305–334.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard (1995). The Scope and Limit of Switch Reference as a Constraint on Pronominal Subject Expression. Hispanic Linguistics, 6/7, 1–27.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard (1997). Accessibility Theory in a Variable Syntax of Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 29–67.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard and Flores-Ferrán, Nydia (2004). Preservation of Subject Expression across Regional Dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context, 1 (1), 41–65.Google Scholar

Carvalho, Ana M., Orozco, Rafael, and Lapidus Shin, Naomi (eds.) (2015). Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish. A Cross-Dialectal Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Brad (1996). “Pragmatic Weight” and Spanish Subject Pronouns: The Pragmatic and Discourse Uses of “tú” and “yo” in Spoken Madrid Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 26 (4), 543–565.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2002– ). Corpus del español; 100 million words, 1200s–1900s. Available from www.corpusdelespanol.orgGoogle Scholar

DeMello, George (2000). Tú impersonal en el habla culta. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica, 48 (2), 359–372.Google Scholar

de Prada Pérez, Ana (2015). First Person Singular Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish in Contact with Catalan. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:121–142.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. (2011). Expression of Pronominal Subjects. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, Chapter 101. Available from wals.info/chapter/101 (last access January 8, 2018).Google Scholar

Duarte Lamoglia, Maria Eugênia (2000). The Loss of the Avoid Pronoun Principle in Brazilian Portuguese. In Kato, M. A. and Negrão, E. V. (eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert Verlag, pp. 17–36.Google Scholar

Elinzaincín, Adolfo (1995). Personal Pronouns for Inanimate Entities in Uruguayan Spanish in Contact with Portuguese. In Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (ed.), Spanish in Four Continents: Studies in Language Contact and Bilingualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 117–131.Google Scholar

Enríquez, Emilia V. (1984). El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: Instituto Miguel de Cervantes.Google Scholar

Erker, Daniel and Guy, Gregory (2012). The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Variability: Variable Subject Personal Pronoun Expression in Spanish. Language, 88 (3), 526–557.Google Scholar

Fernández Soriano, Olga (1999). El pronombre personal. Formas y distribuciones. Pronombres átonos y tónicos. In Bosque, Ignacio and Demonte, Violeta (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Volumen 1: Sintaxis básica de las clases de palabras. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 1209–1273.Google Scholar

Flores-Ferrán, Nydia (2004). Spanish Subject Personal Pronoun Use in New York City Puerto Ricans: Can we Rest the Case of English Contact? Language Variation and Change, 16, 49–73.Google Scholar

Geeslin, Kimberly and Gudmestad, Aarnes (2016). Subject Expression in Spanish. Contrasts between Native and Non-Native Speakers for First- and Second-Person Singular Referents. Spanish in Context, 13 (1), 53–79.Google Scholar

Geeslin, Kimberly, Linford, Bret, and Fafulas, Stephen (2015). Variable Subject Expression in Second Language Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:191–209.Google Scholar

Gili y Gaya, Samuel (1964). Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Bibliograf.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy (1983). Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross Language Study. Typological Studies in Language 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Granda Gutiérrez, G. (1972). Transculturación e interferencia lingüística en el Puerto Rico contemporáneo (1898–1968). Puerto Rico: Editorial Edil.Google Scholar

Guirado, Kristel (2011). La alternancia tú~uno impersonal en el habla de Caracas. Revista de Lingüística, 26, 26–54.Google Scholar

Hochberg, Judith G. (1986). Functional Compensation for /s/ Deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language, 62 (3), 609–621.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Luz Marcela (2005). Condicionamientos sintáctico-semánticos de la expresión del sujeto en el español colombiano. Hispania, 88 (2), 335–348.Google Scholar

Kluge, Bettina (2010). El uso de formas de tratamiento en las estrategias de generalización. In Hummel, M., Kluge, B., and Laslop, M. E. Vázquez (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico. Mexico City: El Colegio de México, Graz: Karl-Franzens-Universität, pp. 1107–1136.Google Scholar

Lastra, Yolanda and Butragueño, Pedro Martín (2015). Subject Pronoun Expression in Oral Mexican Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:39–58.Google Scholar

Lapidus, Naomi and Otheguy, Ricardo (2005). Overt Nonspecific ellos in Spanish in New York. Spanish in Context, 2, 157–74.Google Scholar

Linford, Bret, Long, Avizia, Solon, Megan, and Geeslin, Kimberly (2016a). Measuring Lexical Frequency: Comparison Groups and Subject Expression in L2 Spanish. In Ortega, L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., and Uno, M. (eds.), The Usage-Based Study of Language Learning and Multilingualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 137–154.Google Scholar

Linford, Bret, Long, Avizia, Solon, Megan, Whatley, Melissa, and Geeslin, Kimberly (2016b). Lexical Frequency and Subject Expression in Native and Non-Native Spanish: A Closer Look at Independent and Mediating Effects. In Sessarego, F. and Tejedo, F. (eds.), Spanish Language and Sociolinguistic Analysis. Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 197–216.Google Scholar

Lipski, John M. (1996). Patterns of Pronominal Evolution in Cuban-American Bilinguals. In Roca, Ana and Jensen, John B. (eds.), Spanish in Contact: Issues in Bilingualism. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 159–86.Google Scholar

Martínez-Sanz, Cristina (2011). Null and Overt Subjects in a Variable System: The Case of Dominican Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa.Google Scholar

Matos Amaral, Patrícia and Schwenter, Scott A. (2005). Contrast and the (Non-)Occurrence of Subject Pronouns. In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 116–127.Google Scholar

Meyer-Hermann, Reinhard (1990). Sobre algunas condiciones pragmáticas de la posición del sujeto en español. ELUA Estudios de Lingüística, 6, 73–88.Google Scholar

Michnowicz, Jim (2015). Subject Pronoun Expression in Contact with Maya in Yucatan Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:101–120.Google Scholar

Montrul, Silvina and Sánchez-Walker, Noelia (2015). Subject Expression in Bilingual School-Age Children in the United States. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:231–247.Google Scholar

Morales, Amparo (1989). Hacia un universal sintáctico del español del Caribe. El orden SVO. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica, 5, 139–152.Google Scholar

Morales, Amparo (1997). La hipótesis funcional y la aparición de sujeto no nominal: El español de Puerto Rico. Hispania, 80, 153–165.Google Scholar

Orozco, Rafael (2015). Pronominal Variation in Colombian Costeño Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:17–58.Google Scholar

Orozco, Rafael and Guy, Gregory (2008). El uso variable de los pronombres sujetos: ¿Qué pasa en la costa Caribe colombiana? In Westmoreland, M. and Thomas, J. A. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 70–80.Google Scholar

Otheguy, Ricardo and Zentella, Ana Celia (2012). Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialect, Levelling, and Structural Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Otheguy, Ricardo, Zentella, Ana Celia, and Livert, David (2007). Language and Dialect Contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the Formation of a Speech Community. Language, 83 (4), 770–802.Google Scholar

Pešková, Andrea (2015). Sujetos pronominales en el español porteño: Implicaciones pragmáticas en la interfaz sintáctico–fonológica. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Posio, Pekka (2011). Spanish Subject Pronoun Usage and Verb Semantics Revisited: First and Second Person Singular Subject Pronouns and Focusing of Attention in Spoken Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (3), 777–798.Google Scholar

Posio, Pekka (2012a). The Functions of Postverbal Pronominal Subjects in Spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 5 (1), 149–190.Google Scholar

Posio, Pekka (2012b). Who are “We” in Spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese? Expression and Reference of First Person Plural Subject Pronouns. Language Sciences, 34, 339–360.Google Scholar

Posio, Pekka (2014). Subject Expression in Grammaticalizing Constructions: The Case of creo and acho ‘I think’ in Spanish and Portuguese. Journal of Pragmatics, 63, 5–18.Google Scholar

Posio, Pekka (2015). Subject Pronoun Usage in Formulaic Sequences: Evidence from Peninsular Spanish. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:59–80.Google Scholar

Posio, Pekka (2016). You and We: Impersonal Second Person Singular and other Referential Devices in Spanish Sociolinguistic Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 99, 1–16.Google Scholar

Ramos, Miguel (2016). Continuity and Change. First Person Singular Subject Pronoun Expression in Earlier Spanish. Spanish in Context, 13 (1), 103–127.Google Scholar

Ranson, Diana (1991). Person Marking in the Wake of /s/ Deletion in Andalusian Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 3 (2), 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ranson, Diana (2009). Variable Subject Expression in Old and Middle French Prose Texts: The Role of Verbal Ambiguity. Romance Quarterly, 56 (1), 33–45.Google Scholar

Real Academia Española (n.d.). Banco de datos (CREA) [en línea]. Corpus de referencia del español actual. www.rae.es.Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian and Holmberg, Anders (2010). Introduction: Parameters in Minimalist Theory. In Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I., and Sheehan, M. (eds.), Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar

Sauerland, Uli (2004). A Comprehensive Semantics for Agreement. Paper presented at the Phi-Workshop, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. August 2004. Available from https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/year/2009/docId/11827 (last access December 30, 2017).Google Scholar

Seo, Seunghyun (2001). The Frequency of Null Subject in Russian, Polish, Czech, Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian: An Analysis according to Morphosyntactic Environments (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University.Google Scholar

Serrano, María José (2013). Variación sociosituacional de la colocación del sujeto pronominal en textos conversacionales. Spanish in Context, 10 (2), 261–283.Google Scholar

Serrano, María José and Aijón, Oliva, Miguel Ángel (2010). La posición variable del sujeto pronominal en relación con la cortesía interactiva. Pragmalingüística, 18, 170–204.Google Scholar

Serrano, María José and Aijón, Oliva, Miguel Ángel (2011). Syntactic Variation and Communicative Style. Language Sciences, 33, 138–153.Google Scholar

Shin, Naomi and Erker, Daniel (2015). The Emergence of Structured Variability in Morphosyntax. In Carvalho, et al. 2015:169–189.Google Scholar

Shin, Naomi and Otheguy, Ricardo (2013). Social Class and Gender Impacting Change in Bilingual Settings: Spanish Subject Pronoun Use in New York. Language in Society, 42, 429–452.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (1982). Subject Expression and Placement in Mexican-American Spanish. In Amaste, J. and Olivares, E. (eds.), Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic Aspects. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–120.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (1997). Variación sintáctica en el discurso oral: Problemas metodológicos. In Moreno-Fernández, F. (ed.), Trabajos de sociolingüística hispánica. Alcalá de Henares: University of Alcalá, pp. 115–135.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (2001). Sociolingüística y pragmática del español. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. and Mulac, Anthony (1991). A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 313–339.Google Scholar

Toribio, A. Jacqueline. (2000). Setting Parametric Limits on Dialectal Variation in Spanish. Lingua, 110, 315–341.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena and Travis, Catherine E. (2011). Using Structural Variability to Evaluate Convergence via Code-Switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 241–267.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena and Travis, Catherine E. (2016). Two Languages, One Effect: Structural Priming in Spontaneous Code-Switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19 (4), 733–753.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E. (2007). Genre Effects on Subject Expression in Spanish: Priming in Narrative and Conversation. Language Variation and Change, 19 (2), 101–135.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E. and Torres Cacoullos, Rena (2012). What Do Subject Pronouns Do in Discourse? Cognitive, Mechanical and Constructional Factors in Variation. Cognitive Linguistics, 23 (4), 711–748.Google Scholar

Aelbrecht, L. (2016). What Ellipsis Can Do for Phases and What it Can’t, but not How. The Linguistic Review, 33 (2), 453–482.Google Scholar

Aissen, J. (2003). Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21 (3), 435–483.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A. (2007). Post-Verbal Nominatives: An Unaccusativity Diagnostic under Scrutiny. Talk at On Linguistic Interfaces (OnLI) Workshop, University of Ulster.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 491–539.Google Scholar

Armstrong, G. (2016). Spanish Unspecified Objects as Null Incorporated Nouns. Probus, 28 (2), 165–229.Google Scholar

Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Baker, M. (1997). Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 73–137.Google Scholar

Bassa Vanrell, M. del M. and Romeu, J. (2014). A Minimal Cartography of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Iberia, 6, 75–104.Google Scholar

Beavers, J. and Nishida, C. (2010). The Spanish Dative Alternation Revisited. In Colina, S., Olarrea, A., and Carvalho, A. M. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2009: Selected Papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 217–230.Google Scholar

Belletti, A. (1990). Generalized Verb Movement: Aspects of Verb Syntax. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar

Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych Verbs and a-Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6 (3), 291–352.Google Scholar

Benedicto, E. (1998). Verb Movement and its Effects on Determinerless Plural Subjects. In Schwegler, A., Tranel, B., and Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (eds.), Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar

Bleam, T. (2003). Properties of the Double Object Construction in Spanish. In Núñez-Cedeño, R., López, L., and Cameron, R. (eds.), A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 233–252.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J. and Wurmbrand, S. (2013). Suspension across Domains. In Matushansky, O. and Marantz, A. (eds.), Distributed Morphology Today – Morphemes for Morris Halle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 185–198.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. (2012). Syntactic Islands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. (2014). Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 45 (1), 27–89.Google Scholar

Bosque, I. (1980). Sobre la negación. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar

Bosque, I. (1994). La negación y el principio de las categorías vacías. In Demonte, V. (ed.), Gramática del español. Mexico City: El Colegio de México, pp. 167–199.Google Scholar

Bosque, I. and Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2009). Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar

Casielles-Suárez, E. (2004). The Syntax–Information Structure Interface. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by Phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of Projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49.Google Scholar

Contreras, H. (1986). Spanish Bare NPs and the ECP. In Bordelois, I. and Zagona, K. (eds.), Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 25–49.Google Scholar

Cuervo, M. C. (2003). Datives at Large (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

Demonte, V. (1995). Dative Alternation in Spanish. Probus, 7, 5–30.Google Scholar

Depiante, M. A. (2000). The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora: A Study of Null Complement Anaphora and Stripping/Bare Argument Ellipsis (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar

Emonds, J. (1978). The Verbal Complex V’–V in French. Linguistic Inquiry, 9 (2), 151–175.Google Scholar

Espinal, M. T. (2000). On the Semantic Status of N-Words in Catalan and Spanish. Lingua, 110 (8), 557–580.Google Scholar

Fábregas, A. (2013). Differential Object Marking in Spanish: State of the Art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2 (2), 1–80.Google Scholar

Fernández-Soriano, O. (1999). Two Types of Impersonal Sentences in Spanish: Locative and Dative Subjects. Syntax, 2 (2), 101–140.Google Scholar

Folli, R. (2001). Constructing Telicity in English and Italian (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Franco, J. (1992). Towards a Typology of Psych Verbs: Evidence from Spanish. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo”, 27, 119–134.Google Scholar

Gallego, Á. (2007). Phase Theory and Parametric Variation (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar

Gallego, Á. (2009). Ellipsis by Phase. Talk at the XIX Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. Available from http://filcat.uab.cat/clt/membres/professors/gallego/pdf/GAL_vitoria.pdf (last access November 24, 2017).Google Scholar

Gallego, Á. (2015). Subjunctive Dependents in Iberian Romance: A Reprojection Account. Sintagma, 27, 25–42.Google Scholar

Gallego, Á. and Uriagereka, J. (2007). Conditions on Sub-Extraction. In Eguren, L. and Fernández Soriano, O. (eds.), Coreference, Modality, and Focus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45–70.Google Scholar

González López, V. (2008). Spanish Clitic Climbing (Doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar

Goodall, G. (2001). The EPP in Spanish. In Davies, W. D. and Dubinsky, S. (eds.), Objects and Other Subjects: Grammatical Functions, Functional Categories and Configurationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 193–223.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. and Lipták, A. (2014). Contrast and Island Sensitivity in Clausal Ellipsis. Syntax, 17 (3), 189–234.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Bravo, R. (2006). A Reinterpretation of Quirky Subjects and Related Phenomena in Spanish. In Montreuil, J. P. and Nishida, C. (eds.), New Perspectives in Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 127–142.Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. and Zanuttini, R. (1991). Negative Heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review, 8 (2–4), 233–251.Google Scholar

Hale, K. L. and Keyser, S. J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hankamer, J. and Sag, I. (1976). Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7 (3), 391–426.Google Scholar

Harley, H. (2003). Possession and the Double Object Construction. In Pica, P. and Rooryck, J. (eds.), Linguistics Variation Yearbook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 231–270.Google Scholar

Harley, H. (2011). A Minimalist Approach to Argument Structure. In Boeckx, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 427–448.Google Scholar

Herburger, E. (2001). The Negative Concord Puzzle Revisited. Natural Language Semantics, 9 (3), 289–333.Google Scholar

Hernanz, M. L. (1999). El infinitivo. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 3. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 2197–2356.Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

Jaeggli, O. (1986). Arbitrary Plural Nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4 (1), 43–76.Google Scholar

Jiménez-Fernández, Á. (2009). On the Composite Nature of Subject Islands: A Phase-Based Approach. Sky Journal of Linguistics, 22, 91–138.Google Scholar

Jiménez-Fernández, Á. (2015). Towards a Typology of Focus: Subject Position and Microvariation at the Discourse–Syntax Interface. Ampersand: An International Journal of General and Applied Linguistics, 2, 49–60.Google Scholar

Jurka, J. (2009). Gradient Acceptability and Subject Islands in German (Qualifying Paper). University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Kahnemuyipour, A. (2009). The Syntax of Sentential Stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. S. (1981). Unambiguous Paths. In May, R. and Koster, J. (eds.), Levels of Syntactic Representation. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 143–183.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. S. (2006). On Parameters and on Principles of Pronunciation. In Broekhuis, H., Corver, N., Huybregts, R., Kleinhenz, U., and Koster, J. (eds.), Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 289–299.Google Scholar

Kempchinsky, P. (2009). What Can the Subjunctive Disjoint Reference Effect Tell Us about the Subjunctive? Lingua, 119 (12), 1788–1810.Google Scholar

Kim, J.-H. (2006). La teoría de pro y el sujeto pre / postverbal. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar

Klima, E. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor, J. A. and Katz, J. J. (eds.), The Structure of Language. Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 246–323.Google Scholar

Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D. (1991). The Position of Subjects. Lingua, 85 (2–3), 211–258.Google Scholar

Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the External Argument from its Verb. In Rooryck, J. and Zaring, L. (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 109–137.Google Scholar

Ladusaw, W. (1992). Expressing Negation. In Barker, C. and Dowty, D. (eds.), Proceedings of SALT II. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, pp. 237–259.Google Scholar

Laka, I. (1990). Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

Larson, R. K. (1988). On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19 (3), 335–391.Google Scholar

Levin, B. (1983). On the Nature of Ergativity (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

López, L. (2009). A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

López, L. (2012). Indefinite Objects. Scrambling, Choice Functions and Differential Marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Marantz, A. (1984). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Marantz, A. (1997). No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4 (2), 201–225.Google Scholar

Masullo, P. (1992). Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.Google Scholar

Mateu, J. (2002). Argument Structure: Relational Construal at the Syntax–Semantics Interface (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar

Mateu, J. and Rigau, G. (2002). A Minimalist Account of Conflation Processes: Parametric Variation at the Lexicon–Syntax Interface. In Alexiadou, A. (ed.), Theoretical Approaches to Universals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 211–236.Google Scholar

Mendikoetxea, A. (1999). Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. Bosque, In I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 2. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 1575–1631.Google Scholar

Merchant, J. (2001). The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Merchant, J. (2004). Fragments and Ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27 (6), 661–738.Google Scholar

Nakao, C. (2009). Island Repair and Non-Repair by PF Strategies (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Oehrle, R. (1976). The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

Olarrea, A. (1996). Pre- and Postverbal Subject Positions in Spanish: A Minimalist Account (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. (2000). The Clausal Structure of Spanish: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Ormazábal, J. and Romero, J. (2010). The Derivation of Dative Alternations. In Duguine, M., Huidobro, S., and Madariaga, N. (eds.), Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 203–232.Google Scholar

Ormazábal, J. and Romero, J. (2013). Object Clitics, Agreement and Dialectal Variation. Probus, 25 (2), 301–344.Google Scholar

Ortega-Santos, I. (2016). On Focus-Related Operation at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ott, D. and Struckmeier, V. (2016). Deletion in Clausal Ellipsis: Remnants in the Middle Field. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 22 (1), 225–234.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Jaeger, J. J., Woodbury, A. C., Ackerman, F., Chiarello, C., Gensler, O. D., Kingston, J., Sweetser, E. E., Thompson, H., and Whistler, K. W. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 157–189.Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pineda, A. (2013). Romance Double Object Constructions and Transitivity Alternations. In Boone, E., Kohlberger, M., and Schulpen, M. (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE XX. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, pp. 185–211.Google Scholar

Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20 (3), 365–424.Google Scholar

Rappaport Hovan, M. and Levin, B. (2008). The English Dative Alternation: The Case for Verb Sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics, 44 (1), 129–167.Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. and Siloni, T. (2005). The Lexicon–Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations. Linguistic Inquiry, 36 (3), 389–436.Google Scholar

Richards, N. (2010). Uttering Trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1976). Ristrutturazione. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 1 (1), 1–54.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1986). Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of Pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17 (4), 501–557.Google Scholar

Rodríguez Mondoñedo, M. (2007). The Syntax of Objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar

Romero, J. (1997). Construcciones de doble objeto y gramática universal (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar

Saab, A. (2008). Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Schäfer, F. (2009). The Causative Alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3 (2), 641–681.Google Scholar

Snyder, W. (2000). An Experimental Investigation of Syntactic Satiation Effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 31 (4), 575–582.Google Scholar

Snyder, W. (2001). On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word Formation. Language, 77 (2), 324–342.Google Scholar

Sprouse, J. (2007). A Program for Experimental Syntax: Finding the Relationship between Acceptability and Grammatical Knowledge (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Sprouse, J., Schütze, C., and Almeida, D. (2013). A Comparison of Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments using a Random Sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–248.Google Scholar

Stepanov, A. (2001). Cyclic Domains in Syntactic Theory (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar

Suñer, M. (1995). Negative Elements, Island Effects and Resumptive no. The Linguistic Review, 12 (3), 233–373.Google Scholar

Torrego, E. (1989). Unergative Unaccusative Alternations. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 253–272.Google Scholar

Torrego, E. (1998). The Dependencies of Objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Travis, L. (1984). Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

Tubau, S. (2008). Negative Concord in English and Romance: Syntax–Morphology Interface Conditions on the Expression of Negation (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar

Uriagereka, J. (1999). Multiple Spell-Out. In Epstein, S. and Hornstein, N. (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 251–282.Google Scholar

Valmala, V. (2008). Topic, Focus and Quantifier Float. In Beaskoetxea, X. Artiagoitia and Andrinua, J. Lakarra (eds.), Gramatika jaietan: Patxi Goenagaren omenez. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 837–857.Google Scholar

Wilinski-Hodel, M. (2007). Comportamiento semántico-pronominal de los verbos psicológicos que presentan la alternancia dativa/acusativa (MA Thesis). University of Georgia.Google Scholar

Yoshida, M., Nakao, C., and Ortega-Santos, I. (2014). Ellipsis. In Carnie, A., Sato, Y., and Siddiqi, D. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Syntax. London: Routledge, pp. 192–213.Google Scholar

Zanuttini, R. (1991). Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M. L. and Oh, E. (2007). On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parameterizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 491–539.Google Scholar

Ambadiang, T. (2016). Flexión verbal. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica. London: Routledge, pp. 584–594.Google Scholar

Baker, M. (1985). The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, 16 (3), 373–415.Google Scholar

Barbosa, P. (2001). On Inversion in wh-Questions in Romance. In Aafke, C., Hulk, J., and Pollock, J.-Y. (eds.), Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 20–59.Google Scholar

Barbosa, P. (2009). Two Kinds of Subject pro. Studia Linguistica, 63, 2–58.Google Scholar

Barbosa, P. (2013). Partial Pro-Drop as Null NP Anaphora. In Fainleib, Yelena and LaCara, Nicholas (eds.), NELS 41: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting [2010] of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 1. Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 71–84.Google Scholar

Béjar, S. and Rezac, M. (2009). Cyclic Agree. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 35–73.Google Scholar

Belletti, A. (1999). ‘Inversion’ as Focalization and Related Questions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 9–45.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J. and Wurmbrand, S. (2005). The Domain of Agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 809–865.Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. (2007). On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 589–644.Google Scholar

Bosque, I. and Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2009). Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar

Burga, A. (2008). Spanish Subjects (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois.Google Scholar

Camacho, J. (2000). Structural Restrictions on Comitative Coordination. Linguistic Inquiry, 31 (2), 366–375.Google Scholar

Camacho, J. (2006). Do Subjects Have a Place in Spanish? In Montreuil, J.-P. and Nishida, C. (eds.), New Perspectives in Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 51–56.Google Scholar

Camacho, J. (2013). Null Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Camacho, J. and Sánchez, L. (2014). Does the Verb Raise to T in Spanish? (MS). Rutgers University. Available from http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~jcamacho/publications/adverbs-mono.pdf (last access November 25, 2017).Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. (1996). Subjects and Clause Structure. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 55–95.Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. (2004). Toward a Cartography of Subject Positions. In Rizzi, L. (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 115–165.Google Scholar

Casielles, E. (2001). The Syntax and Semantics of Preverbal Topical Phrases in Spanish. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. and Silva-Villar, L. (eds.), Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89–155.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by Phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. In Belletti, A. (ed.), Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 104–131.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2008). On Phases. In Freidin, R., Otero, C., and Zubizarreta, M. L. (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 133–166.Google Scholar

Contreras, H. (1991). On the Position of Subjects. Syntax and Semantics, 25, 63–79.Google Scholar

D’Alessandro, R. (2016). Syntactic agreement. Course materials, Eastern Generative Grammar (EGG) Summer School. Available from http://www.eggschool.org/earlier-schools/egg-2016-tbilisi-georgia/classes-egg16/dalessandro-syntactic-agreement/ (last access November 25, 2017).Google Scholar

Emonds, J. (1978). The Verbal Complex Vʹ–V in French. Linguistic Inquiry, 9 (2), 151–175.Google Scholar

Etxepare, R. and Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2008). On Negation and Focus in Spanish and Basque. In Beaskoetxea, X. Artiagoitia and Andrinua, J. Lakarra (eds.), Gramatika jaietan: Patxi Goenagaren omenez. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 287–310.Google Scholar

Gallego, Á. (2007). Phase Theory and Parametric Variation (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar

Goodall, G. (2001). The EPP in Spanish. In Davies, W. D. and Dubinsky, S. (eds.), Objects and Other Subjects: Grammatical Functions, Functional Categories and Configurationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 193–223.Google Scholar

Gupton, T. (2014). Preverbal Subjects in Galician: Experimental Data in the A vs. Ā Debate. Probus, 26, 135–175.Google Scholar

Hill, V. (1991). Theoretical Implications of Complementation in Romanian (Doctoral dissertation). Université de Genève.Google Scholar

Hiraiwa, K. (2001). Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese. In Matushansky, O. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st HUMIT Student Conference in Linguistic Research (HUMIT 2000). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 67–80.Google Scholar

Holmberg, A. (2005). Is There a Little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 533–564.Google Scholar

Jiménez-Fernández, Á. and Miyagawa, S. (2014). A Feature-Inheritance Approach to Root Phenomena and Parametric Variation. Lingua, 145, 276–302.Google Scholar

Koeneman, O. and Zeijlstra, H. (2014). The Rich Agreement Hypothesis Rehabilitated. Linguistic Inquiry, 45 (4), 571–615.Google Scholar

Laka, I. (1990). Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

López, L. (2007). Locality and the Architecture of Syntactic Dependencies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

López, L. (2009). A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mare, M. (2012). Sobre la naturaleza de la compañía. Neuquén: EDUCO.Google Scholar

Martínez, J. A. (1999). La concordancia. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Nueva gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 2695–2784.Google Scholar

Masullo, P. (1992). Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.Google Scholar

Ojea, A. (2017). Core-Intentional Features in the Syntactic Computation: Deriving the Position of the Subject in Spanish. Lingua, 195, 72–92. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.06.007.Google Scholar

Olarrea, A. (1996). Pre- and Postverbal Subjects in Spanish: A Minimalist Account (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.Google Scholar

Oltra-Massuet, I. (1999). On the Constituent Structure of Catalan Verbs. In Arregi, K., Bruening, B., Krause, C., and Lin, V. (eds.), Papers in Morphology and Syntax, Cycle One. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 279–322.Google Scholar

Oltra-Massuet, I. (2000). On the Notion of “Theme Vowel”: A New Approach to Catalan Verbal Morphology. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 19.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. (1997). Word Order and Clausal Structure of Spanish and Other Romance Languages (Doctoral dissertation). City University of New York.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. (2000). The Clausal Structure of Spanish: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. (2005). Two Specs for Postverbal Subjects: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan (MS). SUNY.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. (2016). Sujetos. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica. London: Routledge, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. and Treviño, E. (1999). Left Dislocated Subjects and the Pro-Drop Parameter: A Case Study of Spanish. Lingua, 107, 39–68.Google Scholar

Ortega-Santos, I. (2006a). On Locative Inversion and the EPP in Spanish. In Ciscomani, Rosa María Ortiz (ed.), Memoria del VIII Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste, Vol. 2. Hermosillo: Unison, pp. 131–150.Google Scholar

Ortega-Santos, I. (2006b). On New Information Focus, Sentence Stress Assignment Conditions and the Copy Theory: A Spanish Conspiracy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 188–212.Google Scholar

Ortega-Santos, I. (2016). Focus-Related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ortega-Santos, I. and Villa-García, J. (in preparation). Evidence for an Active EPP in Spanish (MS). University of Memphis and University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Parafita Couto, M. C. (2005). Focus at the Interface (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Pérez Saldanya, M. (2012). Morphological Structure of Verbal Forms. In Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., and O’Rourke, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Spanish Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 227–246.Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2001). T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 355–426.Google Scholar

Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20 (3), 365–424.Google Scholar

Preminger, O. (2014). Agreement and Its Failures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

RAE and ASALE. (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar

Richards, N. (2016). Contiguity Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1997). The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337.Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2007). The Syntax of Objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar

Saab, A. (2007). Anti-agreement and null subjects in Spanish: A distributed morphology approach. Handout from IV Encuentro de Gramática Generativa.Google Scholar

Saab, A. (2009). Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Sheehan, M. (2016). Subjects, Null Subjects and Expletives in Romance. In Fischer, S. and Gabriel, C. (eds.), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp. 329–362.Google Scholar

Stjepanović, S. (1999). What do Second Position Cliticization, Scrambling, and Multiple Wh-Fronting Have in Common? (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar

Suñer, M. (2003). The Lexical Preverbal Subject in a Romance Null Subject Language: Where Art Thou? In Núñez-Cedeño, R. et al. (eds.), A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 341–357.Google Scholar

Taraldsen, K. (1993). Subject/Verb-Agreement in Celtic and Romance. In Schafer, Amy J. (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 23, University of Ottawa, Vol. 1. Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 495–504.Google Scholar

Ticio, M. E. (2004). On the Position of Subjects in Puerto Rican Spanish. In Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. and Ticio, M. E. (eds.), Cranberry Linguistics 2. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 12. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar

Tomioka, S. (2003). The Semantics of Japanese Null Pronouns and its Cross-Linguistic Implications. In Schwabe, K. and Winkler, S. (eds.), The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 321–340.Google Scholar

Torrego, E. (1984). On Inversion in Spanish and Some of Its Effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 103–129.Google Scholar

Torrego, E. (2014). The Syntax of φ-Features: 1st and 2nd Person Agreement with Plural DPs (MS). University of MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

Torrego, E. and Laka, I. (2015). The Syntax of φ-Features: Agreement with Plural DPs in Basque and Spanish. In Fernández, B. and Salaburu, P. (eds.), Ibon Sarasola, Gorazarre. Homenatge, Homenaje. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 633–646.Google Scholar

Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (1991). On the Structural Positions of the Subjects in Spanish, their Nature and their Consequences for Quantification (MS). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar

Villa-García, J. (2010). To Agree or Not to Agree: Beyond Quintessentially Syntactic Agreement in Spanish. In Colina, S., Olarrea, A., and Carvalho, A. M. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2009. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 249–266.Google Scholar

Villa-García, J. (2015). The Syntax of Multiple-que Sentences in Spanish: Along the Left Periphery. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Villa-García, J. and Suárez-Palma, I. (2016). Early Null and Overt Subjects in the Spanish of Simultaneous English–Spanish Bilinguals and Crosslinguistic Influence. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29 (2), 350–395.Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, H. (2012). There is Only One Way to Agree. The Linguistic Review, 29 (3), 491–539.Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Word Order, and Focus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M. L. (1999). Word Order in Spanish and the Nature of Nominative Case. In Johnson, K. and Roberts, I. (eds.), Beyond Principles and Parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 223–250.Google Scholar

Abney, S. P. (1987). The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A., Stavrou, M., and Haegeman, L. (2007). Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ambadiang, T. (1999). La flexión nominal. Género y número. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 4843–4913.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. B. (1993). Topics in the Syntax of Nominal Structure across Languages (Doctoral dissertation). CUNY.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. B. (2001). Focusing the “Right” Way in Romance Determiner Phrases. Probus, 13 (1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. (2012). On NPs and Clauses. In Grewendorf, G. and Zimmermann, T. E. (eds.), Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 179−242.Google Scholar

Bosque, I. (ed.). (1996). El sustantivo sin determinación. La ausencia de determinante en la lengua española. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar

Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical–Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Casielles, E. (2004). The Syntax–Information Structure Interface. Evidence from Spanish and English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to Kinds across Languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. (1994). On the Evidence for Partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L., and Zanuttini, R. (eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. (2010). The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. (2014). The Semantic Classification of Adjectives. A View from Syntax. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 25 (1), 1–30.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. (2010). The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. In Heine, B. and Narrog, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar

Contreras, H. (1996). Sobre la distribución de los sintagmas nominales no predicativos sin determinante. In Bosque, 1996: 141–168.Google Scholar

Demonte, V. (1999). A Minimal Account of Spanish Adjective Position and Interpretation. In Franco, J., Landa, A., and Martín, J. (eds.), Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45–75.Google Scholar

Durrlemann, S. (2015). Nominal Architecture in Jamaican Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 30 (2) (2015), 265–306.Google Scholar

Eguren, L. (1989). Algunos datos del español en favor de la hipótesis de la frase determinante. Revista Argentina de Lingüística, 5 (1/2), 163–209.Google Scholar

Eguren, L. (2010). Contrastive Focus and Nominal Ellipsis in Spanish. Lingua, 120 (2), 435–457.Google Scholar

Espinal, M. T. (2009). Bare Nominals in Catalan and Spanish. Their Structure and Meaning. Lingua, 120, 984–1009.Google Scholar

Fábregas, A. (2010). A Syntactic Account of Affix Rivalry in Spanish Nominalisations. In Alexiadou, A. and Rathert, M. (eds.), The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 67–90.Google Scholar

Fábregas, A. (2016) Las nominalizaciones. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar

Gil, J. M. (2016) A Relational Account of the Spanish Noun Phrase. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 36 (1), 22–51.Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra and Longobardi, Giuseppe (1991). The Syntax of Noun Phrases. Configuration, Parameters and Empty Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J. (1991). Extended Projection (MS). Brandeis University.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2003). La semántica de los indefinidos. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. and Mallén, E. (2002). Toward a Unified Analysis of Prenominal Adjectives. In Lee, James F., Geeslin, Kimberly L., and Clements, J. Clancy (eds.), Structure, Meaning, and Acquisition in Spanish. Papers from the 4th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 178–192.Google Scholar

Harris, J. W. (1991). The Exponence of Gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22 (1), 27.Google Scholar

Hudson, R. (1990). English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hudson, R. (2004). Are Determiners Heads? Functions of Language, 11 (1), 7–42.Google Scholar

Ihsane, T. (2008). The Layered DP: Form and Meaning of French Indefinites. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Laca, B. (1996). Acerca de la semántica de los plurales escuetos del español. In Bosque, 1996: pp. 241–268.Google Scholar

Laenzlinger, C. (2005). French Adjective Ordering: Perspectives on DP-Internal Movement Types. Lingua, 115 (5), 645–689.Google Scholar

Leonetti, M. (2013). Information Structure and the Distribution of Spanish Bare Plurals. In Kabatek, J. and Wall, A. (eds.), Bare Noun Phrases in Romance: Theory and (Empirical) Data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121–155.Google Scholar

Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference and Proper Names. Linguistic Inquiry, 25 (4), 609–665.Google Scholar

Martí, L. (2008). The Semantics of Plural Indefinite Noun Phrases in Spanish and Portuguese. Natural Language Semantics, 16 (1), 1–37.Google Scholar

McNally, L. (2004). Bare Plurals in Spanish are Interpreted as Properties. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 115–133.Google Scholar

Montrul, S., Foote, R., and Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender Agreement in Adult Second Language Learners and Spanish Heritage Speakers: The Effects of Age and Context of Acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9922.2008.00449.xGoogle Scholar

Picallo, M. C. (1991). Nominals and Nominalization in Catalan. Probus, 3, 279–316.Google Scholar

Picallo, M. C. (2008). Gender and Number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio, 1, 47–66.Google Scholar

Pérez-Leroux, A na T., Munn, Alan, Schmitt, Cristina, and DeIrish, Michelle. (2004a). Learning Definite Determiners: Genericity and Definiteness in English and Spanish. In Brugos, Alejna, Micciulla, Linnea, and Smith, Christine E. (eds.), Online Proceedings Supplement of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla. Available at http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2011/05/28-perez-leroux.pdf (accessed February 2, 2018).Google Scholar

Rivero, M. L. (1991). Las construcciones de relativo. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar

Saab, A. (2009). Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Saab, A. (2010) (Im)possible Deletions in the Spanish DP. Iberia. An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2 (2), 45–83.Google Scholar

Sánchez, L. (1996). Syntactic Structure in Nominals: A Comparative Study of Spanish and Southern Quechua (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Socarrás, G. (2011). First Language Acquisition in Spanish: A Minimalist Approach to Nominal Agreement. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, A. (1984). The Possessor that Ran Away from Home. The Linguistic Review, 3, 89–102.Google Scholar

Ticio, M. E. (2005). NP-Ellipsis in Spanish. In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Colloquium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 128–141.Google Scholar

Ticio, M. E. (2010). Locality Domains in the Spanish DPs. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Torrego, E. (1987). On Empty Categories in Nominals (MS). University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Valois, Daniel. (1991). The Internal Syntax of DP (Doctoral dissertation). UCLA.Google Scholar

van Eynde, F. (2006). NP-Internal Agreement and the Structure of the Noun Phrase. Journal of Linguistics, 42, 139–186.Google Scholar

Vergnaud, J. and Zubizarreta, M. L. (1992). The Definite Determiner and the Inalienable Constructions in French and in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 595–652.Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP-Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 491–539.Google Scholar

Armstrong, S. (1994). Using Large Corpora. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Beckman, M. E., Díaz-Campos, M., McGory, J. T., and Morgan, T. A. (2002). Intonation across Spanish in the Tones and Break Indices Framework. Probus, 14, 9–36.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1972). Accent is Predictable (If You Are a Mind Reader). Lingua, 48, 633–644.Google Scholar

Brunetti, L. (2004). A Unification of Focus (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florence.Google Scholar

Buitrago, N. (2013). Types of Focus in Spanish: Exploring the Connection between Function and Realization (Doctoral dissertation). Cornell University.Google Scholar

Büring, D. (1997). The Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Street Bridge Accent. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Büring, D. and Gutiérrez-Bravo, R. (2001). Focus-Related Word Order Variation without the NSR: A Prosody Based Cross-Linguistic Analysis. In Bhloscaidh, Séamas Mac (ed.), Syntax and Semantics at Santa Cruz, Vol. 3. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center, University of California, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar

Cabrera-Puche, M. J. (2008). Null Subject Patterns in Language Contact: The Case of Dominican Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University.Google Scholar

Casielles-Suárez, E. (2004). The Syntax–Information Structure Interface: Evidence from Spanish and English. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics and Point of View In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York Academic Press, pp. 27–55.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation. In Steinberg, D. D. and Jakobovits, L. A. (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–216.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1993). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 1–56.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Chung, H. (2012). Two Types of Focus in Castilian Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. (1993). A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 239–267.Google Scholar

Contreras, H. (1978). El orden de palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar

Contreras, H. (1980). Sentential Stress, Word Order, and the Notion of Subject in Spanish. In Waugh, L. R. and van Schooneveld, C. H. (eds.), The Melody of Language: Intonation and Prosody. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar

Contreras, H. (1991). On the Position of Subjects. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing. San Diego, CA and London: Academic Press, pp. 63–79.Google Scholar

Costa, J. (2000). Focus In Situ: Evidence from Portuguese. Probus, 12, 187–228.Google Scholar

Costa, J. (2004). Subject Positions and Interfaces. The Case of European Portuguese. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Domínguez, L. (2004a). Mapping Focus: The Syntax and Prosody of Focus in Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). Boston University.Google Scholar

Domínguez, L. (2004b). The Effects of Phonological Cues on the Syntax of Focus Constructions in Spanish. In Bok-Bennema, R., Hollebrandse, B., Kampers-Manhe, B., and Sleeman, P. (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–81.Google Scholar

Domínguez, L. (2013). Understanding Interfaces: Second Language Acquisition and Native Language Attrition of Spanish Subject Realization and Word Order Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

É. Kiss, K. (1998). Identificational Focus versus Information Focus. Language, 74, 245–273.Google Scholar

Etxepare, R. and Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2008). On Negation and Focus in Spanish and Basque. In Artiagoitia Beaskoetxea, X. and Lakarra Andrinua, J. (eds.), Gramatika jaietan: Patxi Goenagaren omenez. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 287–310.Google Scholar

Face, T. (2002). Local Intonational Marking of Spanish Contrastive Focus. Probus, 14, 71–92.Google Scholar

Fant, L. (1984). Estructura informativa en español. Estudio sintáctico y entonativo. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar

Feldhausen, I. (2016). The Relation between Prosody and Syntax: The Case of Different Types of Left-Dislocations in Spanish. In Armstrong, M. E., Hendriksen, N., and Vanrell, M. D. M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 153–180.Google Scholar

Fox, D. (2000). Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gabriel, C. (2006). Focal Pitch Accents and Subject Positions in Spanish: Comparing Close-to-Standard Varieties and Argentinean Porteño. In Hoffmann, R. and Mixdorff, H. (eds.), Speech Prosody 2006. Dresden: TUD Press. Available from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.387.6737&rep=rep1&type=pdf (last access January 10, 2018).Google Scholar

Gabriel, C. (2010). On Focus, Prosody, and Word Order in Argentinean Spanish: A Minimalist OT account. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, 4, 183–222.Google Scholar

Garrido, J. M., Llisterri, J., de la Mota, C., and Ríos, A. (1993). Prosodic Differences in Reading Style: Isolated vs. Contextualized Sentences. EUROSPEECH’ 93, pp. 573–576. Available from www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech_1993/e93_0573.html (last access January 8, 2018).Google Scholar

Gupton, T. and Leal Méndez, T. (2013). Experimental Methodologies: Two Case Studies Investigating the Syntax–Discourse Interface. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 6 (1), 139–164.Google Scholar

Hoot, B. (2012). Narrow Focus on Pre-Nominal Modifiers in Spanish: An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis. In Geeslin, K. and Díaz-Campos, M. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 293–307.Google Scholar

Hoot, B. (2016). Narrow Presentational Focus in Mexican Spanish: Experimental Evidence. Probus, 28 (2), 335–365.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kempchinsky, P. and Gupton, T. (2009). The Role of Quantitative Data Collection in Theoretical Syntax. Paper Presented at the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Universidad de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar

Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leal, T., Destruel, E., and Hoot, B. (2017). The Realization of Information Focus in Monolingual and Bilingual Native Spanish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. doi: 10.1075/lab.16009.leaGoogle Scholar

López, L. (2009). A Derivational Syntax of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

López-Cortina, J. (2007). The Spanish Left Periphery: Questions and Answers (Doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Martínez-Sanz, C. (2011). Null and Overt Subjects in a Variable System: The Case of Dominican Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa.Google Scholar

Mayol, L. (2012). An Account of the Variation in the Rates of Overt Subject Pronouns in Romance. Spanish in Context, 9 (3), 420–442.Google Scholar

Muntendam, A. (2009). Linguistic Transfer in Andean Spanish: Syntax or Pragmatics? (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Muntendam, A. and Torreira, F. (2016). Focus and Prosody in Spanish and Quechua: Insights from an Interactive Task. In Armstrong, M. E., Hendriksen, N., and Vanrell, M. D. M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar

Neeleman, A. and Reinhart, T. (1998). Scrambling and the PF Interface. In Butt, M. and Geuder, W. (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 309–353.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. J. (2003). Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage. Language, 79 (4), 682–707.Google Scholar

Olarrea, A. (2012). Word Order and Information Structure. In Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., and O’Rourke, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 603–628.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. (1997). Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages (Doctoral dissertation). CUNY.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. (1998). Postverbal Asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16 (2), 313–346.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. (2000). The Clausal Structure of Spanish: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F. and Treviño, E. (1999). Left Dislocated Subjects and the Pro-Drop Parameter: A Case Study of Spanish. Lingua, 107 (1), 39–68.Google Scholar

Ortega-Santos, I. (2008). Projecting Subjects in Spanish and English (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Ortega-Santos, I. (2013). Corrective Focus at the Right Edge in Spanish. Lingua, 131, 112–135.Google Scholar