Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Emergence of Social Theory
- 2 “What Is a Classic?”
- 3 Karl Marx
- 4 The Marxist Legacy
- 5 Émile Durkheim: Theorist of Solidarity
- 6 What’s in a Name?
- 7 Max Weber
- 8 Weberian Social Theory
- 9 Georg Simmel and the Metropolitization of Social Life
- 10 Pounding on Parsons: How Criticism Undermined the Reputation of Sociology’s Incurable Theorist
- 11 Symbolic Interactionism
- 12 Erving Goffman and Dramaturgical Sociology
- 13 Structuralism
- 14 Norbert Elias, Civilising Processes, and Figurational (or Process) Sociology
- 15 Phenomenology and Social Theory
- 16 Pierre Bourdieu: An Intellectual Legacy
- 17 Developing Ethnomethodology: Garfinkel on the Constitutive Interactional Practices in Social Systems of Interaction
- 18 Jürgen Habermas
- 19 Anthony Giddens, Structuration Theory, and Radical Politics
- Index
- References
15 - Phenomenology and Social Theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2020
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Emergence of Social Theory
- 2 “What Is a Classic?”
- 3 Karl Marx
- 4 The Marxist Legacy
- 5 Émile Durkheim: Theorist of Solidarity
- 6 What’s in a Name?
- 7 Max Weber
- 8 Weberian Social Theory
- 9 Georg Simmel and the Metropolitization of Social Life
- 10 Pounding on Parsons: How Criticism Undermined the Reputation of Sociology’s Incurable Theorist
- 11 Symbolic Interactionism
- 12 Erving Goffman and Dramaturgical Sociology
- 13 Structuralism
- 14 Norbert Elias, Civilising Processes, and Figurational (or Process) Sociology
- 15 Phenomenology and Social Theory
- 16 Pierre Bourdieu: An Intellectual Legacy
- 17 Developing Ethnomethodology: Garfinkel on the Constitutive Interactional Practices in Social Systems of Interaction
- 18 Jürgen Habermas
- 19 Anthony Giddens, Structuration Theory, and Radical Politics
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter outlines the contribution of philosophers from the classical phenomenological movement to social theory. It distinguishes two dimensions of sociality that have been explored in depth by phenomenologists, namely intersubjective and collective forms of being-together. With regard to the former, the chapter discusses, in particular, phenomenological conceptions of empathy, socio-communicative acts, social typification, and the lifeworld. With regard to the latter, it focuses on different types of social formations, collective intentionality, and the issue of emotion sharing.
Thomas Szanto is Associate Professor in Philosophy at the Center of Subjectivity Research, Department of Communication at the University of Copenhagen. He has published widely in phenomenology, philosophy of mind, social ontology, and the philosophy of emotions.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory , pp. 292 - 316Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael D. 2004. The Participating Citizen: A Biography of Alfred Schutz, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. 1978. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 2014. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caminada, Emanuele. 2011. “Husserl’s Intentionale Soziologie.” In Mayer, V., Erhard, C., and Scherini, M. (eds.), Die Aktualität Husserls (pp. 56–85). Freiburg/Munich: Alber.Google Scholar
Dolezal, Luna. 2015. The Body and Shame: Phenomenology, Feminism, and the Socially Shaped Body. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
Eilan, Naomi, Hoerl, Christoph, and Roessler, Johannes (eds.). 2005. Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Thomas. 2016. “Intercorporeality and Interaffectivity.” Phenomenology and Mind, 11: 194–209.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aaron. 1979 [1931]. Human Encounters in the Social World. Trans. Kersten, F.. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, Carpenter, Megan, and Rapson, Richard L.. 2014. “Emotional Contagion as a Precursor to Collective Emotions.” In von Scheve, Christian and Salmela, Mikko (eds.), Collective Emotions: Perspectives from Psychology, and Sociology (pp. 108–122). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1967. Being and Time. Trans. by Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1950. Cartesianische Meditationen. Eine Einleitung in die Phänomenologie. Ed. by Strasser, Stephan. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1954 [1970]. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. by Carr, D.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1959 [1923–1924]. Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. Ed. by Boehm, Rudolf. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1973a [1905–1920]. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß. Erster Teil: 1905–1920. Ed. by Kern, Iso. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1973b [1921–1928]. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß. Zweiter Teil: 1921–1928. Ed. by Kern, Iso. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1973c [1928–1935]. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß. Dritter Teil: 1928–1935. Ed. by Kern, Iso. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1989 [1912–1916]. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Second Book Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. by Rojcewicz, R. and Schuwer, A.. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1997 [1923]. Wert des Lebens. Wert der Welt. Sittlichkeit (Tugend) und Glückseligkeit <Februar 1923>. Husserl Studies 13(3): 201–235.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2006 [1929–1934]. Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934). Die C-Manuskripte. Ed. by Lohmar, Dieter. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2008 [1916–1937]. Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937). Ed. by Sowa., Rochus Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2013 [1908–1937]. Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik. Texte Aus dem Nachlass (1908–1937). Ed. by Sowa, Rochus and Vongehr, Thomas. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Rochus, Sowa and Vongehr, Thomas 2016 [1915–1917]. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution und Wissenschaftstheorie (New ed.) Ed. by Fonfara, D.. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Illouz, Eva. 2007. Cold Intimacies. The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Jacob, Pierre. 2011. “The Direct-Perception Model of Empathy: A Critique.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2(3): 519–540.Google Scholar
Kolnai, Aurel. 1936 [1927]. Ekel, Hochmut, Haß: Zur Phänomenologie feindlicher Gefühle. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Koo, Jo-Jo. 2016. “Early Heidegger on Social Reality.” In Salice, Alessandro and Schmid, Hans Bernhard (eds.), The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality (pp. 91–119). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Krebs, Angelika. 2015. Zwischen Ich und Du. Eine dialogische Philosophie der Liebe. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Krueger, Joel. 2016. “The Affective ‘We’: Self-regulation and Shared Emotions.” In Szanto, Thomas and Moran, Dermot (eds.), The Phenomenology of Sociality: Discovering the “We” (pp. 263–277). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Le Bon, Gustave. 1960 [1895]. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
List, Christian, and Pettit, Philip. 2011. Group Agency. The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford, UK, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Litt, Theodor. 1919. Individuum und Gemeinschaft. Grundfragen der sozialen Theorie und Ethik. Leipzig, Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1973 [1955]. Adventures of the Dialectic. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Oksala, Johanna. 2012. “Poststructuralism: Michel Foucault.” In Luft, S. and Overgaard, S. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology (pp. 528–539). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Overgaard, Søren, and Zahavi, Dan, 2009. Phenomenological Sociology.” In Jacobsen, M. H. (ed.), Encountering the Everyday: An Introduction to the Sociologies of the Unnoticed (pp. 93–115). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Brian, Fischer, Agneta H., and Manstead, Antony S. R., 2005. Emotion in Social Relations: Cultural, Group, and Interpersonal Processes. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1993. The Common Mind. An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2003. “Groups with Minds of Their Own.” In Schmitt, F. (ed.), Socializing Metaphysics (pp. 167–193). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Salice, Alessandro. 2013. “Social Ontology as Embedded in the Tradition of Realist Phenomenology.” In Schmitz, M., Kobow, B., and Schmid, H. B. (eds.), The Background of Social Reality (pp. 217–232). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Salmela, Mikko, and Nagatsu., Michiru 2016. “Collective Emotions and Joint Action.” Journal of Social Ontology 2(1): 33–57.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2003 [1943]. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Trans. Barnes, H. E.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1991 [1960]. Critique of Dialectical Reason Volume 1: Theory of Practical Ensembles. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans Bernhard. 2000. Subjekt, System, Diskurs: Edmund Husserls Begriff transzendentaler Subjektivität in sozialtheoretischen Bezügen. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans Bernhard. 2005. Wir-Intentionalität. Kritik des ontologischen Individualismus und Rekonstruktion der Gemeinschaft. Freiburg/Munich: Alber.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans Bernhard. 2009. Plural Action. Essays in Philosophy and Social Science. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans Bernhard. 2014. “The Feeling of Being a Group: Corporate Emotions and Collective Consciousness.” In von Scheve, Christian and Salmela, Mikko (eds.), Collective Emotions. Perspectives from Psychology, and Sociology (pp. 3–16). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1980a [1924]. “Probleme einer Soziologie des Wissens.” In Problem of a Sociology of Knowledge. Trans. by Frings, M. S.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1980b [1926]. Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Neuer Versuch der Grundlegung eines ethischen Personalismus, 3rd ed. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1982 . “Der Krieg als Gesamterlebnis.” In Manfred S. Frings (ed.), Politisch-Pädagogische Schriften. Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 4 (pp. 267–282). Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Hermann. 1922. “Die Soziologisch Kategorie des Bundes.” Dioskuren 1: 35–105.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. 1967 [1932]. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Trans. by Walsh, G. and Lehnert, F.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred, and Luckmann, Thomas. 1974 [1967]. The Structures of the Life-world. Trans. Zaner, R. M. and Engelhardt, H. Tristram. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Schweikard, David, and Schmid, Hans Bernhard. 2013. “Collective Intentionality.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/collective-intentionality/.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1990. “Collective Intentions and Actions.” In Cohen, P., Morgan, J., and Pollack, M. E. (eds.), Intentions in Communication (pp. 401–415). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 2010. Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seemann, Axel (ed.) 2012. Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Edith. 1989 [1917]. On the Problem of Empathy. Trans. Stein., W. Washington, DC: ICS Publication.Google Scholar
Stein, Edith 2010 [1922] Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities. Trans. Baseheart, M. C., and Sawicki, M.. Washington, DC: ICS Publication.Google Scholar
Steinbock, Anthony J. 1995. Home and Beyond: Generative Phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Szanto, Thomas. 2016a. “Husserl on Collective Intentionality.” In Salice, Alessandro and Schmid, Hans Bernhard (eds.), Social Reality: The Phenomenological Approach (pp. 145–172). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Szanto, Thomas. 2016b. “Collectivizing Persons and Personifying Collectives: Reassessing Scheler on Group Personhood.” In Szanto, Thomas and Moran, Dermot (eds.), The Phenomenology of Sociality. Discovering the “We” (pp. 296–312). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Szanto, Thomas. In press. “The Phenomenology of Shared Emotions: Reassessing Gerda Walther.” In Luft, S. and Hagengruber, R. (eds.), Woman Phenomenologists on Social Ontology. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael. 1965. Der Andere. Studien zur Sozialontologie der Gegenwart. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2014. A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1991 [1935]. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. 2013. Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 2008. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory, 3rd edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Vendrell Ferran, Í. 2016. “Affective Intentionality: Early Phenomenological Contributions to a New Phenomenological Sociology.” In Szanto, T. and Moran, D. (eds.), The Phenomenology of Sociality. Discovering the “We.” (pp. 219–233) London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vierkandt, Alfred. 1928. Gesellschaftslehre: Hauptprobleme der philosophischen Soziologie. Stuttgart: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke.Google Scholar
Walther, G. 1923. “Zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften.” Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 6: 1–158.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2002 [1922]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Wolff, Ernst. 2012. “Critical Theory.” In Luft, S., and Overgaard, S. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2001 [1988]. Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity. A Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique. TransBehnke, . by E. A.. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. In press. Intersubjectivity, Sociality, Community. In Dan Zahavi (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Phenomenology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by