Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:11:38.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Erving Goffman and Dramaturgical Sociology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

By
Philip Manning
Edited by
Peter Kivisto
Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

The first part of this chapter reviews Goffman’s intellectual context in terms of the dramaturgical model and its significance in Goffman’s work overall. The second part compared dramaturgy to ethnomethodology before turning to the work after Goffman, particularly the signaling theory championed by Diego Gambetta.

Philip Manning received his PhD from the University of Cambridge in 1989. He is a Professor of Sociology at Cleveland State University. His work concerns social theory and intellectual history, particularly the history and practice of symbolic interactionism. He recently completed an NSF project that designed a user-friendly way to store passwords in games and is currently exploring ways to increase federal grant success in small universities.

Keywords

DramaturgyethnomethodologyHarold GarfinkelErving Goffmansignaling theorysymbolic interactionism
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory , pp. 226 - 249
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Atkinson, M. 1985. Our Masters’ Voices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, T. 1992. Erving Goffman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coleman, James. 1968. “Book review of Garfinkel’s Studies in Ethnomethodology.” American Sociological Review 33(1): 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditton, J. (ed.). 1980. The View from Goffman. London and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. 1956. “The Psychopathology of Everyday Life.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, vol. 6. Edited and translated by Strachey, J. et al., 24 volumes. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. 2009a. “Signaling.” In Hedstrom, Peter and Bearman, Peter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology (pp. 168–194). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. 2009b. Codes of the Underworld: How Criminals Communicate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Glover, J. 1988. The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1951. “Symbols of Class Status.” British Journal of Sociology (11): 294–304.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1952. “On Cooling the Mark Out: Some Aspects of Adaptation to Failure.” Psychiatry 15(4): 451–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, E. 1953. “Communication Conduct in an Island Community.” PhD. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1961a. Asylums. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1961b. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1976. Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper and Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. 1983a. “Felicity’s Condition.” American Journal of Sociology 89(1): 1–53.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1983b. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1982. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Manning, P. D. 1992. Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, P. D. 1998. “Procedure, Reflexivity and Social Constructionism.” In Velody, Irving and Williams, Robin (eds.), The Politics of Constructivism (pp. 159–167). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Manning, P. D. 2000. “Credibility, Agency and the Interaction Order.” Symbolic Interaction 23(3): 283–297.Google Scholar
Manning, P. D. 2005. Freud and American Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Manning, P. D. 2016. “Goffman and Empirical Research.” Symbolic Interaction 39(1): 143–152.Google Scholar
Manning, P. K. 1980. “Goffman’s Framing Order: Style as Structure.” In Ditton, Jason (ed.), The View From Goffman. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Murray, V. 1998. An Elegant Madness: High Society in Regency England. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1949 [1937]. The Structure of Social Action, vols. 1 and 2. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. and Shils, Edward A. (eds.). 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, M. 2011. “The Con Man as Model Organism: The Methodological Roots of Erving Goffman’s Dramaturgical Self.” History of the Human Sciences 24(2): 138–154.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. 2012 [1978]. The Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. 1988. “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” In Drew, P. and Wootten, A. (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order (pp. 89–135). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1998. Mind, Language and Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sennett, R. 1970. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1971 [1903]. On Individuality and Social Forms. Edited and introduced by Levine, Donald N.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, G. 1997. “Incivil Attention and Everyday Intolerance: Vicissitudes of Exercising in Public Places.” Perspectives on Social Problems 9: 57–79.Google Scholar
Smith, G. 2006. Erving Goffman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, G. 2013. “The Dramaturgical Legacy of Erving Goffman.” In Edgley, Charles (ed.), The Drama of Social Life: An Interactionist Handbook (pp. 57–71). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilshire, Bruce. 1982. “The Dramaturgical Model of Behavior: Its Strengths and Weaknesses.” Symbolic Interaction 5(2): 287–298.Google Scholar
Winkin, Yves, and Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy. 2013. Erving Goffman: A Critical Introduction to Media and Communication Theory. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Velody, Irving, and Williams, Robin (eds.).1998. The Politics of Constructivism. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Bulmer, M. 1984. The Chicago School of Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Drew, P., and Wootten, A. (eds.) 1988. Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (ed.) 1995. A Second Chicago School? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G., and Manning, P.. 2000. “Erving Goffman: Shifting Impressions and Tight Frames.” In Ritzer, George (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists (pp. 457–485). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1926. On the Question of Lay Analysis. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, vol. 20 (pp. 177–258). Edited and translated by Strachey, J. et al., 24 volumes. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Jaworski, G. 2000. “Erving Goffman: The Reluctant Apprentice.” Symbolic Interaction 23(3): 299–308.Google Scholar
Lyman, S., and Scott, M.. 1970. A Sociology of the Absurd. New York: Meredith Corporation.Google Scholar
Lyman, S., and Scott, M. 1975. The Drama of Social Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, P. D. 1991. “Drama as Life: The Significance of Goffman’s Changing Use of the Dramaturgical Metaphor.” Sociological Theory 9(1): 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, G. 1984. “Role Models and Role Distance: A Remembrance of Erving Goffman.” Theory and Society 13(5): 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, J. 1993. “An Interview with Erving Goffman, 1980.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3): 317–348.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×