Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T19:32:37.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part 2 - Inflectional and Derivational Morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Edited by
Danko Šipka  and
Wayles Browne
Danko Šipka
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Wayles Browne
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics , pp. 127 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Andersen, H. (2012). The new Russian vocative: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Scando-Slavica, 58(1), 122–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstatt, T. (2008). Der slavische Vokativ im europäischen Kontext. In Geist, L. & Mehlhorn, G., eds. Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik XV, Munich: Sagner, pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
Baerman, M. (2009). Case syncretism. In Malchukov, & Spencer, , pp. 219–230.Google Scholar
Baerman, M. (2014). Historical development of Slavic inflectional accent. In Gutschmidt, et al., pp. 1590–1596.Google Scholar
Berdicevskis, A. (forthcoming). Gender and declension. In Fellerer, J. & Bermel, N., eds., Oxford Guide to the Slavonic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breu, W. (2020). Paucal. In Greenberg, M., ed. Encyclopedia of Slavic Languages and Linguistics Online. Brill Reference Online. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2589-6229_ESLO_COM_031985.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1965). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache, 2nd ed., Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (1988). Gender in Slavonic from the standpoint of a general typology of gender systems. The Slavonic and East European Review, 66(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Dalewska-Greń, H. (1997). Języki słowiańskie, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Daniel, M. & Spencer, A. (2009). The vocative – an outlier case. In Malchukov, & Spencer, , pp. 626–634.Google Scholar
Doleschal, U. (2009). Nominale Kategorien: Genus. In Kempgen, et al., pp. 143–146.Google Scholar
Dybo, V. A. (1981). Slavjanskaja akcentologija, Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Fortson, B. (2010). Indo-European Language and Culture, 2nd ed., Chichester & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Furlan, M. (2013). K identifikaciji zgodnjepraslovanske akrostatične deklinacije ijevskih samostalnikov. Jezikoslovni zapiski, 19(1), 51–70.Google Scholar
Gorbachov, Y. (2017). The Proto-Slavic genitive-locative dual: A reappraisal of (South-)West Slavic and Indo-European evidence. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 25(1), 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, M. (2017). Slavic. In Kapović, M., ed. The Indo-European Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 519–551.Google Scholar
Gutschmidt, K., Kempgen, S., Berger, T., & Kosta, P., eds. (2014). Die slavischen Sprachen. The Slavic Languages. Vol. II, Berlin & New York, NY: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, J. (2001). Vergleichen und Einordnen: Graduierung im Slavischen. In Jachnow, H., Norman, B., & Suprun, A., eds., Quantität und Graduierung als kognitiv-semantische Kategorien, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 560–573.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, J. (2009). Synthetismus und Analytismus im Slavischen. In Kempgen, et al., pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1993). The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics, 31, 279–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2021). Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics, 73(3), 605–633. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, G. & Th, Menzel. (2009). Nominale Kategorien: Kasus. In Kempgen, et al., pp. 161–176.Google Scholar
Hill, E. (2015). Suppletion replication in grammaticalization and its triggering factors. Language Dynamics and Change, 5(1), 52–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, W. (2006). Das Altkirchenslavische. In Rehder, P., ed., Einführung in die slavischen Sprachen, 5th ed., Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 35–48.Google Scholar
Iordanidi, S. I. & Krysʹko, V. B. (2000). Istoričeskaja grammatika drevnerusskogo jazyka. Vol. I. Množestvennoe čislo imennogo sklonenija, Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1971a). Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem. In Selected Writings. Vol. II, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 154–183.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1971b). Quest for the essence of language. In Selected Writings. Vol. II, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 345–359.Google Scholar
Janda, L. (1996). Back from the Brink. A Study of How Relic Forms in Languages Serve as Source Material for Analogical Extension, Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Janda, L. (1999). Whence virility? The rise of a new gender distinction in the history of Slavic. In Mills, M., ed. Slavic Gender Linguistics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins, pp. 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. (2014). Introduction to Slavic historical morphology: Slavic noun classes. In Gutschmidt, et al., pp. 1565–1582.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, J. (1989). Language and gender in the Tarim Basin: The Tocharian 1 sg. pronoun. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies, 3, 125–148.Google Scholar
Kempgen, S., Kosta, P., Berger, T., & Gutschmidt, K., eds. (2009). Die slavischen Sprachen. The Slavic Languages. Vol. I, Berlin & New York, NY: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klenin, E. (2014). Animacy, personhood. In Kempgen, et al., pp. 152–161.Google Scholar
Koch, Ch. (1992). Zur Vorgeschichte des relativen Attributivkonnexes im Baltischen und Slavischen. In Barschel, B., Kozianka, M., & Weber, K., eds., Indogermanisch, Slawisch und Baltisch, Munich: Peter Lang, pp. 45–88.Google Scholar
Kondrašov, N. A. (1986). Slavjanskie jazyki, Moscow: Prosveščenie.Google Scholar
Körtvélyessy, L. & Štekauer, P. (2018). Postfixation or inflection inside derivation. Folia Linguistica, 52(2), 351–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krysʹko, V. B. (2014). Entstehung der Kategorie der Belebtheit/Personalität. In Gutschmidt, et al., pp. 1596–1605.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. (1949). Le problème du classement des cas. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego, 9, 20–43.Google Scholar
Langston, K. (2018). The morphology of Slavic. In Klein, J., Joseph, B., & Fritz, M., eds., Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics. Vol. III, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1397–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstedt, J. (2014). Balkan Slavic and Balkan Romance: from congruence to convergence. In Besters-Dilger, J. et al., eds., Congruence in Contact-Induced Language Change, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majer, M. (2015). Russian kotóryj, Czech který, Slovene katę́ri: vowel variation in the reflexes of Proto-Slavic *koterъ(jь) ‘which (of the two)’. Scando-Slavica, 61(2), 154–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majer, M. (2021). Slavic ‘i-stem adjectives’ and their alleged inflection loss: the derivational prehistory and synchronic status of a category. In Blanc, A. & Boehm, I., eds., Dérivation nominale et innovations dans les langues indo-européennes anciennes, Lyon: MOM Éditions, pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
Malchukov, A. & Spencer, A., eds. (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Case, Oxford & New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mannewitz, C. (2009). Nominale Kategorien: Steigerung. In Kempgen, et al., pp. 188–199.Google Scholar
Manova, S. (2011). Understanding Morphological Rules: With Special Emphasis on Conversion and Subtraction in Bulgarian, Russian and Serbo-Croatian, Dordrecht & New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manova, S. & Dressler, W. (2001). Gender and declensional class in Bulgarian. Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 67, 45–81.Google Scholar
Marušič, F. & Žaucer, R. (2012). On Slovenian demonstrative reinforcers and the internal structure of demonstratives. In Marković, M., Halupka-Rešetar, S., Milićević, N., & Milić, T., eds., Selected Papers from SinFonIJA 3, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 76–104.Google Scholar
Olander, Th. (2015). Proto-Slavic Inflectional Morphology, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. (forthcoming). Case with special reference to syncretism and indeclinables. In Fellerer, J. & Bermel, N., eds., Oxford Guide to the Slavonic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, J. (2002). Morphologische Innovationen des Altkirchenslavischen. Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch, 48, 133–148.Google Scholar
Schenker, A. (1993). Proto-Slavonic. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 60–121.Google Scholar
Sims, A. (2015). Inflectional Defectiveness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolev, A. N. (2009). From synthetic to analytic case: variation in South Slavic dialects. In Malchukov, & Spencer, , pp. 716–729.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, E. (1968). Grammatical genders of the Slavic languages. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics, 11, 27–41.Google Scholar
Suprun, A. E. (1969). Slavjanskie čislitelʹnye. Stanovlenie čislitelʹnyx kak osoboj časti reči, Minsk: Izdatelʹstvo BGU im. V.I. Lenina.Google Scholar
Sussex, R. & Cubberley, P. (2006). The Slavic Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, O. (2015). Polish gender, subgender, and quasi-gender. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 23(1), 83–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šimundić, M. (1971). Govor Imotske krajine i Bekije, Sarajevo: Akademija Nauka i Umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. (1983). A comparison of the morphological adaptation of loanwords ending in a vowel in contemporary Czech, Russian, and Serbo-Croatian. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 25(1), 180–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topolinjska, Z. (2009). Definiteness (Synchrony). In Kempgen, et al., pp. 176–188.Google Scholar
Topolinjska, Z. (2014). Definiteness (Diachrony). In Gutschmidt, et al., pp. 1606–1615.Google Scholar
Vaillant, A. (1958). Grammaire comparée des langues slaves. II: Morphologie. 1. Flexion nominale, Lyon: Editions IAC.Google Scholar
Vaillant, A. (1964). Manuel du vieux slave. I. Grammaire, Paris: Institut d’Études Slaves.Google Scholar
Vermeer, W. (1984). Opozicija tipa “živo/neživo” u množini u jednom čakavskom sistemu (Omišalj). Naučni sastanak slavista u Vukove dane, 13, 275–287.Google Scholar
Vidoeski, B. (1999). Dijalektite na makedonskiot jazik. III, Skopje: Makedonska Akademija na Naukite i Umetnostite.Google Scholar
Villanueva Svensson, M. (2019). The infinitive in Baltic and Balto-Slavic. Indo-European Linguistics, 7(1), 194–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wandl, F. (2022a). Superlative morphology from syntax: Slavic nai‑/naj‑ and internal definiteness marking in Old Lithuanian. Transactions of the Philological Society, 120(1), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wandl, F. (2022b). Trapped morphology and the rise of the Slavic definite adjective inflection: A reexamination. Folia Linguistica Historica, 43. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2022-2012.Google Scholar
Worth, D. (1966). On the stem/ending boundary in Slavic indeclinables. Zbornik za filologiju i lingvistiku, 9, 11–16.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A. (1973). O ponimanii termina “padež” v lingvističeskix opisanijax. In Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija, Moscow: Nauka, pp. 53–87.Google Scholar
Žolobov, O. F. & Krysʹko, V. B. (2001). Istoričeskaja grammatika drevnerusskogo jazyka. II. Dvojstvennoe čislo, Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar

Bibliography

This bibliography is severely constrained, with very deserving works omitted, notably textbooks (so often underrated, and Slavic studies has so many outstanding ones).

Alexander, R. (with the assistance of O. M. Mladenova) (2000). Intensive Bulgarian. A Textbook and Reference Grammar. Volumes 1–2, Madison, WI & London: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. (2006). Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian, A Grammar. With Sociolinguistic Commentary, Madison, WI & London: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. (1998). Slavic. In Ramat, & Ramat, , pp. 415–453.Google Scholar
Baláž, P., Darovec, M., & Trebatická, H. (1976). Slovak for Slavicists, Bratislava: SPN.Google Scholar
Beekes, R. S. P. (1995). Comparative Indo-European Linguistics. An Introduction, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, W. (1993). Serbo-Croat. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 306–387.Google Scholar
Browne, W. & Alt, T. (2004). A Handbook of Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian, Durham, NC: SEELRC Duke University. https://slaviccenters.duke.edu/projects/grammars.Google Scholar
Bulaxovskij, L. A. (1958). Istoričeskij kommentarij k russkomu literaturnomu jazyku, Kyiv: Radjans’ka škola.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds. (1993). The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dalewska-Greń, H. (2012). Języki słowiańskie, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Darden, B. J. (2018). Balto-Slavic morphology. In Klein, et al., pp. 1985–1999.Google Scholar
de Bray, R. G. A. (1980). Guide to the Slavonic Languages, 3rd ed., Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Faßke, H. (1981), Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart. Morphologie, Bautzen: VEB Domowina-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fortson, B. W. (2004). Indo-European Language and Culture. An Introduction, Oxford & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. A. (1993). Macedonian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 249–305.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. L. (2006). A Short Reference Grammar of Standard Slovene, University of Kansas. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/5469/m.l.greenberg_slovene_grammar_8dec06.pdf;sequence=1.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. L. (2017). Slavic. In Kapović, , pp. 519–551.Google Scholar
Herrity, P. (2000). Slovenian: A Comprehensive Grammar, 1st ed. (2nd ed. not consulted due to Covid), London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A. V. (1962). Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart, Teil 1. Formenlehre, Halle (Saale): VEB Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kapović, M., ed., (2017). The Indo-European Languages, 2nd ed., London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kapović, M. (2017). Proto-Indo-European morphology. In Kapović, , pp. 61–110.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, V. (1963). Russische historische Grammatik, Band II. Die Entwicklung des Formensystems, Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Klein, J., Joseph, B., & Fritz, M., eds. (in cooperation with M. Wenthe) (2018). Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics, Vol. 3, Berlin & Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, K. (2018). The morphology of Slavic. In Klein, et al., pp. 1538–1556, especially pp. 1551–1555.Google Scholar
Lenček, R. L. (1982). The Structure and History of the Slovenian Language, Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Leskien, A. (1962). Handbuch der altbulgarischen (altkirchenslavischen) Sprache, 8th ed., Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Lundquist, J. & Yates, A. D. (2018). The morphology of Proto-Indo-European. In Klein, et al., pp. 2079–2195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunt, H. G. (2001). Old Church Slavonic Grammar, 7th ed., Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, P. (1993). Belorussian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 887–946.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1934). Le slave commun, 2nd ed., Paris: Institut d’Études Slaves.Google Scholar
Mykhaylyk, R. (2010). Diachronic universals and morpheme order in the Ukrainian synthetic imperfective future. Morphology, 20, 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9182-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandriş, G. (1959/1965). Handbook of Old Church Slavonic. Part 1: Old Church Slavonic Grammar, London, Toronto, & New York, NY: University of London, The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (2018). The evolution of Slavic. In Klein, et al., pp. 1600–1621.Google Scholar
Olander, T. (2015). Proto-Slavic Inflectional Morphology. A Comparative Handbook, Leiden & Boston, MA: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polański, K. (1993). Polabian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 795–824.Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S. (1993). Slovenian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 388–451.Google Scholar
Ramat, A. G. & Ramat, P., eds. (1998). The Indo-European Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, especially Chapters 5 (C. Watkins), 14 (H. Andersen), and 15 (W. R. Schmalstieg.Google Scholar
Rothstein, R. A. (1993). Polish. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 686–758.Google Scholar
Scatton, E. A. (1993). Bulgarian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 188–248.Google Scholar
Schenker, A. M. (1973). Beginning Polish, 2 vols, revised ed., New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schenker, A. M. (1993). Proto-Slavonic. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 60–121.Google Scholar
Schenker, A. M. (1995). The Dawn of Slavic. An Introduction to Slavic Philology, New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schmalstieg, W. R. (1998). Baltic. In Ramat, & Ramat, , pp. 454–479.Google Scholar
Shevelov, G. Y. (1993). Ukrainian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 947–998.Google Scholar
Short, D. (1993). Czech. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 455–532.Google Scholar
Short, D. (1993). Slovak. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 533–592.Google Scholar
Stone, G. (1993). Sorbian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 593–685.Google Scholar
Stone, G. (1993). Kashubian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 759–794.Google Scholar
Sussex, R. & Cubberley, P. (2006). The Slavic Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szemerényi, O. J. L. (1990). Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. (1993). Russian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 827–886.Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. (2004). A Reference Grammar of Russian, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaillant, A. (1966). Grammaire comparée des langues slaves. Tome III. Le verbe, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1969). Indogermanische Grammatik. Band III: Formenlehre. Erster Teil: Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion, Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1998). Proto-Indo-European: Comparison and reconstruction. In Ramat, & Ramat, , pp. 25–73 (especially pp. 54–67).Google Scholar
Werner, E. (1996). Studien zum sorbischen Verbum, Bautzen: VEB Domowina-Verlag.Google Scholar
Young, S. (2017). Balto-Slavic. In Kapović, , pp. 479–485.Google Scholar
Young, S. (2017). Baltic. In Kapović, pp. 486–518.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Andersen, H. (2006). Periphrastic futures in Slavic: Divergence and convergence. In Eksell, K. & Vinther, T., eds., Change in Verbal Systems: Issues in Explanation, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 9–45.Google Scholar
Anstatt, T., Clasmeier, C., & Wölke, S. (2020). Obersorbisch: Aus der Perspektive der slavischen Interkomprehension, Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Aronson, H. (1968). Bulgarian Inflectional Morphophonology, The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bondaruk, A. & Rozwadowska, B. (2019). Polish object experiencer verbs in the stative and eventive passive. In Bondaruk, A. & Jaskuła, K., eds., All Around the Word. Papers in Honour of Bogdan Szymanek on his 65th Birthday, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, pp. 47–78.Google Scholar
Browne, W. (1993). Serbo-Croat. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G, The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 306–387.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds. (1993). The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cvrček, V. et al. (2010). Mluvnice současné češtiny 1: Jak se píše a mluví, Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Dalewska-Greń, H. (1997). Języki słowiańskie, Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Desclés, J.-P. & Guenchéva, Z. (1990). Discourse analysis of aorist and imperfect in Bulgarian and French. In Thelin, N. B, ed., Verbal Aspect in Discourse, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrušina, N. R. (2016). Soslagatel‘noe naklonenie v russkom jazyke. Opyt issledovanija grammatičeskoj semantiki, Prague: Animedia.Google Scholar
Embick, D. (1995). Mobile inflections in Polish. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS), 25(2), 127–142.Google Scholar
Fasske, H. (1981). Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart: Morphologie, Bautzen: VEB Domowina-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fiedler, W. (1999). Tempus, Modus und Aspekt in den Sprachen Südosteuropas. In Hinrichs, U. & Büttner, U., eds., Handbuch der Südosteuropalinguistik, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 487–517.Google Scholar
Franks, S. & Bański, P. (1999). Approaches to ‘schizophrenic’ Polish person agreement. In Dziwirek, K., Coats, H., & Vakareliyska, C., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 7. The Seattle Meeting, 1998, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 123–143.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. A. (1986). Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian. In Chafe, W. L. & Nichols, J., eds., Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Norwood, NY: Ablex, 168–187.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. A. (1993). Macedonian. In Comrie, B & Corbett, G. G, The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 249–305.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. A. (2004). The typology of Balkan evidentiality and areal linguistics. In Tomić, O. M., ed., Balkan Syntax and Semantics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 101–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabka, K. et al. (1988). Russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Bd. 2: Morphologie, Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Giger, M. (2009). Der Resultativ in den slavischen Sprachen. In Kempgen, S. et al., eds., The Slavic Languages: An International Handbook of Their Structure, Their History and Their Investigation, Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 269–274.Google Scholar
Gołąb, Z. (1964). The problem of verbal moods in Slavic languages. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics, 8(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1951). The Old Church Slavonic conjugation. Word, 7, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauge, K. R. (1999). A Short Grammar of Contemporary Bulgarian, Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Hill, P. (2009). Das Bulgarische. In Rehder, P., ed., Einführung in die slavischen Sprachen (mit einer Einführung in die Balkanphilologie), 6th ed., Darmstadt: WBG, pp. 310–325.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A. V. (1962). Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart I: Formenlehre, Halle (Saale): VEB Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1948). Russian conjugation. Word, 4, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempgen, S., Kosta, P., Gutschmidt, K., & Berger, T., eds. (2009). The Slavic Languages: An International Handbook of Their Structure, Their History and Their Investigation, Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, V. (2013). Linguistik des Russischen: Grundlagen der formal-funktionalen Beschreibung, Munich: Otto Sagner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin-Steinmann, A. (2004). Die Legende vom bulgarischen Renarrativ: Bedeutung und Funktion der kopulalosen l-Periphrase, Munich: Otto Sagner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstedt, J. (1994). On the development of the South Slavonic perfect. Three papers on the perfect. EUROTYP Working Papers, 6(5), 32–53.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, J. (2010). Mood in Bulgarian and Macedonian. In Rothstein, B. & Thieroff, R., eds., Mood in the Languages of Europe. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunt, H. G. (1952). A Grammar of the Macedonian Literary Language, Skopje: Državno Knigoizdatelstvo na NR Makedonija.Google Scholar
Mayo, P. (1993). Belorussian. In Comrie, B & Corbett, G. G, The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 887–946.Google Scholar
Mehlig, H. R. (1999). Die grammatischen Kategorien des Verbs unter funktionalen Gesichtspunkten. In Jachnow, H., ed., Handbuch der sprachwissenschaftlichen Russistik und ihrer Grenzdisziplinen, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 182–272.Google Scholar
Migdalski, K. (2006). The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Moldovan, A. M. et al., eds. (2005). Jazyki mira: Slavjanskie jazyki, Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Nicolova, R. (2017). Bulgarian Grammar, Berlin: Frank und Timme.Google Scholar
Panzer, B. (1967) Der slavische Konditional: Form – Gebrauch – Funktion, Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Panzer, B. (1999). Die slavischen Sprachen in Gegenwart und Geschichte: Sprachstrukturen und Verwandtschaft, 3rd. ed., Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Petruxin, P. V. & Sičinava, D. V. (2006). Russkij pljuskvamperfekt v tipologičeskoj perspective. In Moldovan, A. M. et al., eds., Verenica liter: K 60-letiju V. M. Živova, Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul‘tury, pp. 193–214.Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S. (1993). Slovene. In Comrie, B & Corbett, G. G, The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 388–451.Google Scholar
Rehder, P. (2009). Das Makedonische. In Rehder, P., ed., Einführung in die slavischen Sprachen (mit einer Einführung in die Balkanphilologie), 6th ed., Darmstadt: WBG, pp. 331–346.Google Scholar
Rehder, P., ed. (2009). Einführung in die slavischen Sprachen (mit einer Einführung in die Balkanphilologie), 6th ed., Darmstadt: WBG.Google Scholar
Rivero, M. L. & Simeonova, V. (2015). The inferential future in Bulgarian: An evidential modal proposal. In Szajbel-Keck, M., Burns, R., & Kavitskaya, D., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 23: The First Berkeley Meeting, 2014, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 282–301.Google Scholar
Rivero, M. L., Arregui, A., & Slavkov, N. (2017). The grammaticalization of ‘big’ situations: The IMPF operator and perfective imperfects in Bulgarian. In Fernández-Soriano, O., Castroviejo Miró, E, & Pérez-Jiménez, I, eds., Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces: Case Studies in Honor of Violeta Demonte, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 152–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, R. A. (1993). Polish. In Comrie, B & Corbett, G. G, The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 686–758.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B. & Thieroff, R., eds. (2010). Mood in the Languages of Europe, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scatton, E. A. (1984). A Reference Grammar of Modern Bulgarian, Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Šewc, H. (1968). Gramatika hornjoserbskeje rěče, 1: Fonematika a morfologija, Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar
Shevelov, G. Y. (1993). Ukrainian. In Comrie, B & Corbett, G. G, The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 947–998.Google Scholar
Short, D. (1993a). Czech. In Comrie, B & Corbett, G. G, The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 455–532.Google Scholar
Short, D. (1993b). Slovak. In Comrie, B & Corbett, G. G, The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 533–592.Google Scholar
Sičinava, D. V. (2013). Tipologija pljuskvamperfekta. Slavjanskij pljuskvamperfekt, Moscow: AST Press.Google Scholar
Sonnenhauser, B. (2006). Aspekt und Aorist/Imperfekt im Bulgarischen – eine intervall-basierte Analyse. Die Welt der Slaven, 51, 116–140.Google Scholar
Sonnenhauser, B. (2013). ‘Evidentiality’ and point of view in Bulgarian. Săpostavitelno ezikoznanie, 38(2–3), 110–130.Google Scholar
Stieber, Z. (1973). Zarys gramatyki porównawczej języków słowiańskich. II: Fleksja werbalna, Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Stone, G. (1993). Sorbian (upper and lower). In Comrie, B & Corbett, G. G, The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 593–685.Google Scholar
Sussex, R. & Cubberley, P. (2006). The Slavic Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, R. H. (1984). Combinations of tense and modality. In Gabbay, D. M. & Guenthner, F., eds., Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 2, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 135–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomić, O. M. (1999). Negation and imperatives. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 191–206.Google Scholar
Tomić, O. M. (2008). Mood and negation in Balkan Slavic. In Zybatow, G. et al., eds., Formal Description of Slavic Languages: The Fifth Conference, Leipzig 2003, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 461–477.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. E. (1975). Russian Word Formation, Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. E. & Janda, L. A. (1996). Common and Comparative Slavic: Phonology and Inflection, Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, V. S. (2009). The conditional. In Kempgen, S. et al., eds., The Slavic Languages: An International Handbook of Their Structure, Their History and Their Investigation, Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, 484–505.Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, V. S. & Volodin, A. P. (1986). Semantika i tipologija imperativa: Russkij imperative, Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Žovtobrjux, M. A. & Moldovan, A. M. (2005). Ukrainskij jazyk. In Moldovan, A. M. et al., eds., Jazyki mira: Slavjanskie jazyki, Moscow: Academia, pp. 513–548.Google Scholar

References

Arkad‘ev, P. M. (2015). Areal‘naja tipologija prefiksal‘nogo perfektiva (na materiale jazykov Evropy i Kavkaza), Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul‘tury.Google Scholar
Batiukova, O., Bertinetto, P. M., Lenci, A., & Zarcone, A. (2012). Semantic priming study of Russian aspect and resultativity. Oslo Studies in Language, 4 (1), 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benacchio, R. (2010). Vid i kategoria vežlivosti v slavjanskom imperative. Sravnitel‘nyj Analiz, Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Bermel, N. (1997). Context and the Lexicon in the Development of Russian Aspect, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bláha, O. (2020a). Některé vývojové tendence ve vidovém systému současné češtiny. Naše řeč, 103(4), 320–336.Google Scholar
Bláha, O. (2020b). Vidová neparovost v češtině ve srovnání s ruštinou. In Veselý, L., ed., Kapitoly o slovesném vidu nejen v češtině, Prague: Akropolis, pp. 127–141.Google Scholar
Bondarko, A. V. (1971). Vid i vremja russkogo glagola, Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Borik, O. (2006). Aspect and Reference Time, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braginsky, P. & Rothstein, S. (2008). Vendlerian classes and the Russian aspectual system. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 16 (1), 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunčić, D. (2013). Biaspektuelle Verben als Polyseme: Über Homonymie, Aspektneutralität und die konative Lesart. Die Welt der Slaven, 58 (1), 36–53.Google Scholar
Clasmeier, C. (2015). Die mentale Repräsentation von Aspektpartnerschaften russischer Verben, Munich: Kubon & Sagner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Wit, A. (2016). The Present Perfective Paradox across Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, S. M. (2000). Parameters of Slavic Aspect: A Cognitive Approach, Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Dickey, S. M. (2005). S-/Z- and the grammaticalization of Slavic aspect. Slovene Linguistic Studies, 5, 3–55.Google Scholar
Dickey, S. M. (2010). Common Slavic ‘indeterminate’ verbs of motion were really manner-of-motion verbs. In Hasko, V. & Perelmutter, R., eds., New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 67–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, S. M. (2011). The varying role of po- in the grammaticalization of Slavic aspectual systems: Sequences of events, delimitatives, and German language contact. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 19 (2), 175–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, S. M. (2015). Parameters of Slavic Aspect reconsidered: The east-west aspect division from a diachronic perspective. In Schrager, M. et al., eds. Studies in Accentology and Slavic Linguistics in Honor of Ronald F. Feldstein, Bloomington, IN: Slavica, pp. 29–45.Google Scholar
Dickey, S. M. (2017). Prefixation in the rise of Slavic aspect. In Benacchio, R. et al., eds., The Role of Prefixes in the Formation of Aspect and Related Categories. Problems of Grammaticalization, Florence: Firenze University Press, pp. 85–102.Google Scholar
Dickey, S. M. (2018a). Thoughts on the ‘Typology of Slavic Aspect’. Russian Linguistics, 42 (1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, S. M. (2018b). The collapse of the Common Slavic tense system as a catastrophe in the development of the Slavic aspectual category. In Bethin, C. Y., ed., American Contributions to the 16th International Congress of Slavists, Belgrade 2018. Volume 1: Linguistics, Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
Dickey, S. M. & Janda, L. A. (2015). Slavic aspectual prefixes and numeral classifiers: Two kinds of lexico-grammatical unitizers. Lingua, 168, 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, S. M. & Kresin, S. H. (2009). Aspect and negation in Russian and Czech. Russian Linguistics, 33 (2), 121–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dostál, A. (1954). Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině, Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Eckhoff, H. & Janda, L. A. (2014). Grammatical profiles and aspect in Old Church Slavonic. Transactions of the Philological Society, 112 (2), 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, J. (1970). A Grammar of Aspect: Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gagarina, N. (2009). Verbs of motion in Russian: An acquisitional perspective. Slavic and East European Journal, 53(3), 451–470.Google Scholar
Galton, H. (1976). The Main Functions of the Slavic Verbal Aspect, Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
Gorbova, E. V. (2019). Dvuxkomponentnaja model‘ russkogo vida: položenija, predskazanija, podtverždenija. Slavistika, 23 (1), 45–61.Google Scholar
Grønn, A. (2003). The Semantics and Pragmatics of the Russian Factual Imperfective. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Ivančev, S. (1961). Kontekstovo obuslovena ingresivna upotreba na glagolite ot nesvăršen vid v češkija ezik. Godišnik na Sofijskija Universitet, 54(3), 1–152.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A. V. (1960). Grammatičeskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii s slovackim. Čast‘ vtoraja: morfologija, Bratislava: Izdatel‘stvo Akademii nauk.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1957). Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A. (2007). Aspectual clusters of Russian verbs. Studies in Language, 31(3), 607–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. A., Endresen, A., Kuznetsova, J., Lyashevskaya, O., Makarova, A., Nesset, T., & Sokolova, S. (2013). Why Russian Aspectual Prefixes Aren‘t Empty: Prefixes as Verb Classifiers, Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Kamphuis, J. (2014). Macedonian verbal aspect: east or west? In Fortuin, E. et al., eds., Dutch Contributions to the Fifteenth International Congress of Slavists, Minsk: Linguistics, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamphuis, J. (2020). Verbal Aspect in Old Church Slavonic, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolaković, Z. (2021). Factors contributing to prefixation of biaspectual verbs in Croatian. Russian Linguistics, 45 (1), 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopečný, F. (1962). Slovesný vid v češtině, Prague: Nakladatelství Československé Akademie věd.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, J. & Makarova, A. (2012). Distribution of two semelfactives in Russian: -nu- and -anu-. Oslo Studies in Language, 4 (1), 155–176.Google Scholar
Łaziński, M. (2020). Wykłady o aspekcie polskiego czasownika, Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinonen, M. (1982). Russian Aspect, “Temporal‘naja Lokalizacija” and Definiteness/Indefiniteness, Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lindsey, T. S. (2011). Bulgarian Verbs of Motion: Slavic Verbs in a Balkan Context. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Maslov, J. S. (1948). Vid i leksičeskoe značenie glagola. Izvestija AN SSSR. Otdelenie literatury i jazyka, 7(4), 303–316.Google Scholar
Mehlig, H. R. (2001). Verbal aspect and the referential status of verbal predicates: On aspect usage in Russian WHO-questions. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8 (1), 99–125.Google Scholar
Mehlig, H. R. (2013). Obščefaktičeskoe i edinično-faktičeskoe značenija nesoveršennogo vida v russkom jazyke. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Ser. 9, 4, 19–47.Google Scholar
Mertins, B. (2018). Sprache und Kognition. Ereigniskonzeptualisierung im Deutschen und Tschechischen, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mučnik, I. P. (1971). Grammatičeskie kategorii glagola i imeni v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jazyke, Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Mrhačová, E. (1993). Korelativní slovesa pohybu ve slovanských jazycích, zvláště v ruštině, Ostrava: Sfinga.Google Scholar
Nesset, T. (2013). The history of the Russian semelfactive: The development of a radial category. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 21 (1), 123–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesset, T. (2020). What’s in a Russian aspectual prefix? A cognitive linguistics approach to prefix meanings. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 28 (2), 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, J. (1997). Tense, aspect and verbal derivation in the language of the Novgorod Birch Bark letters. Russian Linguistics, 21, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petruxina, E. (2011). Aspektual‘nye kategorii glagola v russkom jazyke v sopostavlenii s češskim, slovackim, pol‘skim i bolgarskim jazykami, Moscow: Izdatel‘stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Piperski, A. (2018). The grammatical profiles of Russian biaspectual verbs. In Kopotev, M., Lyashevskaya, O., & Mustajoki, A., eds., Quantitative Approaches to the Russian Language, London: Routledge, pp. 115–136.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G. C. (2005). Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes. Nordlyd, 32 (2), 323–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saicová Římalová, L. (2010). Vybraná slovesa pohybu v češtině. Studie z kognitivní lingvistiky, Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Šatunovskij, I. (2009). Problemy russkogo vida, Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul‘tur.Google Scholar
Sekaninová, E. (1980). Sémantická analyza predponového slovesa v ruštine a slovenčine, Bratislava: Vydavatel‘stvo Slovenskej akadémie vied.Google Scholar
Shull, S. (2003). The Experience of Space: The Privileged Role of Spatial Prefixation in Czech and Russian, Munich: Kubon & Sagner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (1997). The Parameter of Aspect, 2nd ed., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenhauser, B. (2006). Yet There’s Method in It: Semantics, Pragmatics and the Interpretation of the Russian Imperfective Aspect, Munich: Kubon & Sagner.Google Scholar
Stankov, V. (1976). Konkurencija na glagolnite vidove v bălgarskija knižoven ezik, Sofia: Bălgarska akademija na naukite.Google Scholar
Stoll, S. (2005). Beginning and end in the acquisition of the perfective aspect in Russian. Journal of Child Language, 32, 805–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stunová, A. (1986). Aspect and iteration in Russian and Czech: A contrastive study. In Barentsen, A. A., Groen, B. M., & Sprenger, R., eds., Dutch Studies in Russian Linguistics [Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 8], Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 467–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stunová, A. (1993). A Contrastive Analysis of Russian and Czech Aspect: Invariance vs. Discourse. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, S. G. (2015). Akcional‘nost‘ v leksike i v grammatike, Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul‘tury.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66 (2), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinnitskaya, I. & Wexler, K. (2001). The role of pragmatics in the acquisition of Russian aspect. First Language, 21, 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, B. (2017). Slavic resultatives and their extensions: Integration into the aspect system and the role of telicity. Slavia, 86(2–3), 124–168.Google Scholar
Wiemer, B. & Seržant, I. A. (2017). Diachrony and typology of Slavic aspect: What does morphology tell us? In Bisang, W. & Malchukov, A., eds., Unity and Diversity in Grammaticalization Scenarios, Berlin: Language Science Press, pp. 239–307.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A., Mikaèljan, I. L., & Šmelev, A. D. (2015). Russkaja aspektologija: v zaščitu vidovoj pary, Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul‘tury.Google Scholar

References

Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous Morphology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1985). Word Formation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Embick, D. & Halle, M. (2005). On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Geerts, T et al., eds., Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ 2003, Nijmegen, 20–22 November, pp. 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.270.03emb.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladney, F. Y. (2019). On the morphosyntax of Russian verbal aspect. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 19, 117–160.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 3–16.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Matushansky, O. (2006). The morphology of Russian adjectives. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 351–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1961). Linguistic elements and their relations. Language, 37, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1975), Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language, 51, 639–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manova, S. (2011). Understanding Morphological Rules: With Special Emphasis on Conversion and Subtraction in Bulgarian, Russian and Serbo-Croatian, Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1966). On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In Dinneen, G, ed., Report of the Seventeenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 201–224.Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. (2004). Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Norlyd, 32, 205–253.Google Scholar
Švedova, N. J. Russkaja grammatika (RG), Moscow: ANSSSR & Nauka. www.rusgram.narod.ru.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak., A.A. (n.d.). Obratnyj (inversionnyj) indeks k russkomu jazyku A.A, Zaliznjaka v 4-x častjax. ivanov-portal.ru.Google Scholar

References

For further reading, see Chapter 11 on derivation in this volume. The only general monograph on nominal composition in Slavic as a whole is Pohl 1977.

Bauer, L. (2005). Compound. In Brown, K., ed., Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Burlington, VT: Elsevier, pp. 719‒726.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (2017). Compounds and Compounding, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derksen, R. (2008). Etymological Dictionary of the Slavic Inherited Lexicon, Leiden & Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
Havlová, E., ed. (1989). Etymologický slovník jazyka staroslověnského, Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Holzer, G. (2020). Untersuchungen zum Urslavischen, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jurišić, B. (1992). Nacrt hrvatske slovnice. Tvorba imenica u povijesnom razvoju, Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.Google Scholar
Kapović, M. (2019). Shortening, lengthening, and reconstruction: Notes on historical Slavic accentology. Rasprave Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 45(1), 75–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P., eds. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matasović, R. (2014). Slavic Nominal Word-Formation. Proto-Indo-European Origins and Historical Development, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Ohnheiser, I. (2015). Compounds and multi-word expressions in Slavic. In Müller, P. O., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S., & Rainer, F., eds., Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Vol. 1, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 757–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. (2015). Composition. In Müller, P. O., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S., & Rainer, F., eds., Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Vol. 1, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 364–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, H. D. (1977). Die Nominalkomposition im Alt- und Gemeinslavischen. Ein Beitrag zur slavischen, indogermanischen und allgemeinen Wortbildung, Klagenfurt: Klagenfurter Sprachwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Ralli, A. (2013). Compounding in Modern Greek, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sławski, F., ed. (1974–2001). Słownik prasłowiański, 8 vols., Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, E. (1986). The Slavic Languages: Unity in Diversity, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussex, R. & Cubberley, P. V. (2006). The Slavic Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymanek, B. (2011). IE, Slavonic: Polish. In Lieber, & Štekauer, , eds., pp. 733–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubačev, O. N., ed. (1974–2014). Ètimologičeskij slovar’ slavjanskix jazykov, Моscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Vaillant, A. (1974). Grammaire comparée des langues Slaves. IV: La formation de noms, Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Zimmer, S. (2016). Notes on the structure and meaning of some Slavic nominal compounds. Suvremena lingvistika, 42(8), 149–154.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×