Morphology

doi:10.1017/9781108580410.012

Part Three - Morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2022

Edited by

Adam Ledgeway and

Martin Maiden

Show author details

Adam Ledgeway: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden: Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics , pp. 319 - 488

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Becker, M., Clemens, L., and Nevins, A. (2017). ‘Generalization of French and Portuguese plural alternations and initial syllable protection’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35: 299–345.Google Scholar

Cristófaro-Silva, T. (2002). ‘Organização fonológica de marcas de plural no português brasileiro: uma abordagem multirrepresentacional’, Revista da Abralin 11: 273–306.Google Scholar

Dokulil, M. ([1958] 1994). ‘On morphological oppositions’. In Luelsdorff, P. A., Panenová, J., and, Sgall, P. (eds), Praguiana 1945–1990, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 113–30.Google Scholar

Hualde, I. and Chițoran, I. (2016). ‘Surface sound and underlying structure: the phonetics–phonology interface’, In Fischer, S. and Gabriel, C. (eds), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 23–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maiden, M. (2001). ‘Di nuovo sulle alternanze “velari” nel verbo italiano e spagnolo’, Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 8: 39–61.Google Scholar

Martinet, A. (1965). ‘De la morphonologie’, La Linguistique 1: 1–30.Google Scholar

Nevins, A. (2011). ‘Phonologically conditioned allomorph selection’. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C., Hume, E., and Rice, K. (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2357–82.Google Scholar

O’Neill, P. (2015). ‘The origin and spread of velar allomorphy in the Spanish verb: a morphomic approach’, Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 92: 489–518.Google Scholar

Salvioni, C. (1900). ‘A proposito di amiś’, Romania 29: 546–58.Google Scholar

Tekavčić, P. (1972). ‘Sull’alternanza morfematica nel verbo italiano’, Linguistica 12: 269–300.Google Scholar

Touratier, C. (1987). ‘Morphologie du verbe italien dans une perspective contrastive’, Cahiers d’Etudes Romanes 12: 267–82.Google Scholar

Tuttle, E. (1995). ‘On placing northern Italian noun singulars from plurals of the type amís “friend” within a theory of optimality and markedness’, Romance Philology 48: 389–415.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Anderson, S. (1992). A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baerman, M., Brown, D., and Corbett, G. (eds) (2015). Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blevins, J. (2016). Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blevins, J. and Blevins, J. (eds) (2009). Analogy in Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2010). The Evolution of Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cruschina, S., Maiden, M., and Smith, J. C. (eds) (2013). The Boundaries of Pure Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Luís, A. and Bermúdez-Otero, R. (eds) (2016). The Morphome Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maiden, M. (2018). The Romance Verb. Morphomic Structure and Diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maiden, M., Smith, J. C., Goldbach, M., and Hinzelin, M.-O. (eds) (2011). Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sims, A. (2016). Inflectional Defectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stump, G. (2016). Inflectional Paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Aski, J. (1995). ‘Verbal suppletion: an analysis of Italian, French and Spanish to go’, Linguistics 33: 403–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Börjars, K. and Vincent, N. (2011). ‘The pre-conditions for suppletion’. In Galani, A., Hicks, G., and Toulas, G. (eds), Morphology and Its Interfaces. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 239–65.Google Scholar

Corbett, G. (2007). ‘Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words’. Language 83: 8–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dressler, W. (1985). ‘Sur le statut de la suppléance dans la Morphologie Naturelle’, Langages 78: 41–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fertig, D. (1998). ‘Suppletion, natural morphology and diagrammaticity’, Linguistics 36: 1065–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Juge, M. (1999). ‘On the rise of suppletion in verbal paradigms’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 25: 183–94.Google Scholar

Maiden, M. (2004). ‘When lexemes become allomorphs: on the genesis of suppletion’, Folia Linguistica 38: 227–56.Google Scholar

Maiden, M. (2014). ‘Two suppletive adjectives in Megleno-Romanian’. Revue Romane. 49: 32–51.Google Scholar

Melčuk, I. (2000). ‘Suppletion’. In Booij, G., Lehmann, C., & Mugdan, J. (eds), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 510–22.Google Scholar

Nurmio, S. (2017). ‘The development and typology of number suppletion in adjectives’, Diachronica 34: 127–74.Google Scholar

Rudes, B. (1980). ‘On the nature of verbal suppletion’, Linguistics 18: 655–76.Google Scholar

Veselinova, L. (2006). Suppletion in Verb Paradigms. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Acquaviva, P. (2008). Lexical Plurals. A Morphosemantic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baerman, M. (2015). ‘Introduction’. In Baerman, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Inflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–8.Google Scholar

Booij, G. (2006). ‘Inflection and derivation’. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, 654–61.Google Scholar

Dressler, W. (1985a). Morphonology. The Dynamics of Derivation. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar

Forza, F. and Scalise, S. (2016). ‘Compounding’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 524–37.Google Scholar

Hacken, P. Ten (2014). ‘Delineating derivation and inflection’. In Lieber, R. and Stekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10–25.Google Scholar

Karlsson, K. E. (1981). Syntax and Affixation. The Evolution of mente in Latin and Romance. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Müller, P. O., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S., and Rainer, F. (eds) (2015). Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Olsen, S. (2014). ‘Delineating derivation and compounding’. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–31.Google Scholar

Rainer, F. (2016). ‘Derivational morphology’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 513–23.Google Scholar

Scalise, S. and Bisetto, A. (2009). ‘The classification of compounds’. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 34–53.Google Scholar

Štekauer, P. (2015a). ‘The delimitation of derivation and inflection’. In Müller, P. O., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S., and Rainer, F. (eds), Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter, 218–34.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Alonso, A. (1954). Estudios lingüísticos: temas españoles. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Bello, A. (1847). Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Santiago de Chile: Imprenta del Progreso.Google Scholar

Camproux, C. (1951). ‘Déficience et vitalité de la dérivation’, Le Français moderne 19: 181–86.Google Scholar

Cazacu, B. (1950). ‘Despre unele forme verbale cu sufixe diminutivale’, Studii şi cercetări lingvistice 1: 91–98.Google Scholar

Dressler, W. and Merlini Barbaresi, L. (1994). Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Eddington, D. (2017). ‘Dialectal variation in Spanish diminutives: a performance model’, Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10: 39–66.Google Scholar

Hasselrot, B. (1957). Étude sur la formation diminutive dans les langues romanes. Uppsala: Lundequist.Google Scholar

Maurer, T. Jr. (1969). ‘Um sufixo de comportamento original: o diminutivo em -zinho’. In Barbadinho Neto, R. (ed.), Estudos em homagem a Cândido Jucá (filho). Rio de Janeiro: Simões, 233–46.Google Scholar

Napoli, D. J., and Reynolds, B. (1995). ‘Evaluative affixes in Italian’. In Booij, G. and van Marle, J. (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1994. Dordrecht: Springer, 151–78.Google Scholar

Stump, G. (1993). ‘How peculiar is evaluative morphology?’, Journal of Linguistics 29: 1–36.Google Scholar

Wagner, M. L. (1952). ‘Das ‟Diminutiv” im Portugiesischen’, Orbis 1: 460–76.Google Scholar

Zwicky, A., and Pullum, G. (1987). ‘Plain morphology and expressive morphology’. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1987: 330–40.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Bauer, B. (2004). ‘Vigesimal numerals in Romance: an Indo-European perspective’. In Drinka, B. (ed.), Indo-European Language and Culture in Historical Perspective: Essays in Memory of Edgar C. Polomé. General Linguistics 41, 21–46.Google Scholar

Bauer, B. (2017). Nominal Apposition in Indo-European. Forms, Functions and Its Evolution in Latin-Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bauer, B. (2021). ‘The formation of numerals in the Romance languages’. In Loporcaro, M. and Gardani, F. (eds), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Romance Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.685 Google Scholar

Coleman, R. (1992). ‘Italic’. In Gvozdanović, J. (ed.), Indo-European Numerals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 389–445.CrossRef Google Scholar

Comrie, B. (2003). ‘Numeral systems in the languages in Europe and North and Central Asia: preliminary results from the WALS database’. In Suihkonen, P. and Comrie, B. (eds), Collection of Papers, International Symposium on Deictic Systems and Quantification in Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Izhevsk: Udmurt State University, 32–41.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1978). ‘Numeral systems’. In Greenberg, J. (ed), Universals of Human Language. 3. Word Structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 251–95.Google Scholar

Klein, H. A. (1974). The Science of Measurement. A Historical Survey. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Menéndez Pidal, R. (1973 [1904]). Manual de gramática histórica española, 14th ed. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar

Price, G. (1992). ‘Romance’. In Gvozdanović, J. (ed.), Indo-European Numerals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 447–97.Google Scholar

Rohlfs, G. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. 3. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1992). Before Writing. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Zeshan, U., Delgado, C., Dikyuva, D., Panda, C., and de Vos, C. (2013). ‘Cardinal numerals in rural sign languages: approaching cross-modal typology’, Linguistic Typology 17: 357–96.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part Three - Morphology

Summary

Access options

References

Selected References

Selected References

Selected References

Selected References

Selected References

Selected References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive