Information Structure

doi:10.1017/9781108580410.031

26 - Information Structure

from Part Five - Semantics and Pragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2022

Silvio Cruschina ,

Ion Giurgea and

Eva-Maria Remberger

Edited by

Adam Ledgeway and

Martin Maiden

Show author details

Adam Ledgeway: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden: Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter deals with the analyses of the grammatical phenomena that have been related to information structure in the Romance languages, and that have played a central role in the general research on the encoding of information-structure notions in the grammar and at the interfaces. An overview is presented of this work, which has offered a great contribution to our current understanding of both empirical and theoretical issues. Highly debated questions are addressed, such as the relationship between focus and newness and between topic and givenness, the grammatical and interpretive correlates of different types of focus and topics, and the ‘aboutness’ nature of topics in contrast with subjects.

Keywords

information structure topic focus subject fronting dislocation topicalization inversion new information old information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics , pp. 784 - 814

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.031 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Belletti, A. (2004). ‘Aspects of the low IP area’. In Rizzi, L. (ed.), The Structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, II. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 16–51.Google Scholar

Benincà, P. (2001). ‘The position of topic and focus in the left periphery’. In Cinque, G. and Salvi, G. (eds), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 39–64.Google Scholar

Cruschina, S. (2012). Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cruschina, S. (2016). ‘Information and discourse structure’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 596–608.Google Scholar

Cruschina, S., and Remberger, E.-M. (2017). ‘Focus fronting.’ In Dufter, G. and Stark, E. (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 502–35.Google Scholar

Giurgea, I. (2016). ‘On the interpretation of focus fronting in Romanian’, Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 37–61.Google Scholar

Giurgea, I. (2017). ‘Preverbal subjects and topic marking in Romanian’, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 62: 279–322.Google Scholar

Leonetti, M. (2017). ‘Basic constituent orders’. In Dufter, A. and Stark, E. (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 887–932.Google Scholar

Remberger, E.-M. (2010). ‘Left peripheral interactions in Sardinian’, Lingua 120: 555–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Remberger, E.-M. (2014). ‘A comparative look on focus fronting in Romance’. In Dufter, A. and Toledo y Huerta, À. O. (eds), Left Sentence Peripheries of Spanish. Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 383–418.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1997). ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar