Dependency, Licensing, and the Nature of Grammatical Relations

doi:10.1017/9781108580410.024

20 - Dependency, Licensing, and the Nature of Grammatical Relations

from Part Four - Syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2022

Anna Cardinaletti and

Giuliana Giusti

Edited by

Adam Ledgeway and

Martin Maiden

Show author details

Adam Ledgeway: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden: Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we discuss three classes of phenomena that are captured by the terms dependency and licensing, in clauses and nominal expressions: (i) the structural relation between a lexical head (e.g., V, N, A) and the functional structure projected by it such as the relation between a verb and an auxiliary or between a noun and a determiner; (ii) the selectional relation between a lexical head and the constituents that are combined with it to satisfy its argument structure, as in the case of the verb and the direct object; and (iii) the structural relation created by two different constituents that share the same referential index. In the third case, we observe two major types: a constituent is displaced, as in the case of the subject of a passive clause or a wh-constituent; or two constituents share the same referent but have different functions in the clause (or in different clauses), as is the case of pronouns and their antecedents. The dependencies dealt with in the first two cases are ‘local’, while the others can be long distance. Most of the analyses of the dependency phenomena relate the relative richness in inflexional morphology to variation in word order, argument marking, agreement, and the realization of pronominal reference.

Keywords

adjectives argument structure dependency differential object marking licensing possessives clitic pronouns

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics , pp. 604 - 636

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.024 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Belletti, A. (1990). Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. (2004). ‘Toward a cartography of subject positions’. In Rizzi, L. (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, II. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 115–65.Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. and Starke, M. (1999). ‘The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of the three classes of pronouns’. In van Riemsdijk, H. (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin/New York: Mouton, 145–233.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. (1994). ‘On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP’. In Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L., and Zanuttini, R. (eds), Paths towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard Kayne. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 85–110.Google Scholar

Costa, J. (2004). Subject Positions and Interfaces: the Case of European Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1994). The Syntax of Romanian. Comparative Studies in Romance. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef Google Scholar

Giusti, G. (2006). ‘Parallels in clausal and nominal periphery’. In Frascarelli, M. (ed.), Phases of Interpretation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 163–84.Google Scholar

Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D. (1991). ‘The position of subjects’, Lingua 85: 211–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ledgeway, A. (2011). ‘Syntactic and morphosyntactic typology and change’. In Maiden, M., Smith, J. C., and Ledgeway, A. (eds), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages. Vol. 1. Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 382–471.Google Scholar

Picallo, C. (1994). ‘Catalan possessive pronouns: the avoid pronoun principle revisited’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12: 259–99.Google Scholar

Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). ‘Verb-movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1997). ‘The fine structure of the Left Periphery’. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.CrossRef Google Scholar