Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:27:01.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Cleft Sentences and Relative Clauses

from Part Three - Topics in RRG: Complex Sentences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2023

Delia Bentley
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Ricardo Mairal Usón
Affiliation:
Universidad National de Educación a Distancia, Madrid
Wataru Nakamura
Affiliation:
Tohoku University, Japan
Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
Affiliation:
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Get access

Summary

This chapter proposes a Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) analysis of externally and internally headed relative clauses, free relatives, non-restrictive relatives, and it-cleft sentences. Particular emphasis is placed on the interface properties of these constructions and the challenges that they pose in the syntax–semantics and semantics–syntax linking. The chapter also reflects on the similarities and differences between relatives and clefts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentley, Delia, Ciconte, Francesco Maria and Cruschina., Silvio 2015. Existentials and Locatives in Romance Dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, Charles. 1968. Relative clauses in Bambara. Journal of West African Languages 5: 3547.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Tomlin, Robert (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse (Typological Studies in Language 11), 2152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2015. Three phenomena discriminating between ‘raising’ and ‘matching’ relative clauses. Semantics–Syntax Interface 2(1): 126.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara. 2004. On headed, headless and light-headed relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(1): 95126.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1998. Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1: 5986.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin. 2000. A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 38(6): 11011131.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1988. Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-Clefts. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy. 2000. The referential status of clefts. Language 76(2): 891920.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 247301. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 6399.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2): 245273.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 2000. When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence focus constructions across languages. Studies in Language 24(3): 611682.Google Scholar
Pavey, Emma L. 2004. The English It-Cleft Construction: A Role and Reference Grammar Analysis. Unpublished dissertation, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1999. A typology of the interaction of focus structure and syntax. In Raxilina, Ekatarina and Testelec, Jakov (eds.), Typology and the Theory of Language: From Description to Explanation, 511524. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2012. Some issues in the linking between syntax and semantics in relative clauses. In Comrie, Bernard and Estrada-Fernández, Zarina (eds.), Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas: A Typological Overview, Typological Studies in Language 102, 4764. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert and LaPolla, Randy. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×