The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences Volume 1: Building a Program of Research
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I From Idea to Reality: The Basics of Research
- Part II The Building Blocks of a Study
- Part III Data Collection
- 13 Cross-Sectional Studies
- 14 Quasi-Experimental Research
- 15 Non-equivalent Control Group Pretest–Posttest Design in Social and Behavioral Research
- 16 Experimental Methods
- 17 Longitudinal Research: A World to Explore
- 18 Online Research Methods
- 19 Archival Data
- 20 Qualitative Research Design
- Part IV Statistical Approaches
- Part V Tips for a Successful Research Career
- Index
- References
20 - Qualitative Research Design
from Part III - Data Collection
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 May 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I From Idea to Reality: The Basics of Research
- Part II The Building Blocks of a Study
- Part III Data Collection
- 13 Cross-Sectional Studies
- 14 Quasi-Experimental Research
- 15 Non-equivalent Control Group Pretest–Posttest Design in Social and Behavioral Research
- 16 Experimental Methods
- 17 Longitudinal Research: A World to Explore
- 18 Online Research Methods
- 19 Archival Data
- 20 Qualitative Research Design
- Part IV Statistical Approaches
- Part V Tips for a Successful Research Career
- Index
- References
Summary
The social world is fascinating – full of complexities, tensions, and contradictions. Social scientists have long been interested in better understanding the social world around us. Unlike quantitative research, that focuses on collecting and analyzing numerical data to make statistical inferences about the social world, qualitative research contributes to empirical and theoretical understandings of society by examining and explaining how and why people think and act as they do through the use of non-numerical data. In other words, qualitative research uncovers social processes and mechanisms undergirding human behavior. In this chapter, we will discuss how to design a qualitative research project using two of the most common qualitative research methods: in-depth interviewing and ethnographic observations (also known as ethnography or participant observation). We will begin the chapter by discussing the what, how, and why of interviewing and ethnography. We will then discuss the importance of interrogating one’s underlying ontological and epistemological assumptions regarding research (and the research process) and the steps to follow in designing a qualitative study. We conclude the chapter by reviewing the different elements to consider when developing a qualitative research project.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral SciencesVolume 1: Building a Program of Research, pp. 420 - 440Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Aurini, J.D., Heath, M., & Howells, S. (2016). The How to of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Banks, S., Armstrong, A., Carter, K., et al. (2013). Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science, 8(3), 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byskov, M. F. (2020). What makes epistemic injustice an ‘injustice’? Journal of Social Philosophy, 52(1), 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calarco, J. M. (2018). Negotiating Opportunities: How the Middle Class Secures Advantages in School. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, L. (2005). Virginity Lost: An Intimate Portrait of First Sexual Experiences. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. (1989). The social construction of Black feminist thought. Signs, 14, 745–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P. H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, 2nd ed. Routledge.Google Scholar
Coughlin, S. S., Smith, S. A., & Fernandez, M. E. (2017). Overview of community-based participatory research. In Coughlin, S. S., Smith, S. A., & Fernandez, M. E. (eds.), Handbook of Community-Based Participatory Research (pp. 1–10). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, K. & Damaske, S. (2021). The Science and Art of Interviewing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575.Google Scholar
Holstein, A. & Gubrium, A. F. (2002). Active interviewing. In Weinberg, D. (ed.), Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 112–126). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, N. (2010). Between Good and Ghetto: African American Girls and Inner-City Violence. Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Lara-Millán, A. (2021). Redistributing the Poor: Jails, Hospitals, and the Crisis of Law and Fiscal Austerity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luker, K. (2008). Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info Glut. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Manzo, L. C. & Brightbill, N. (2007). Toward a participatory ethics. In Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods (pp. 59–66). Routledge.Google Scholar
Morris, A. (2015). The Scholar Denied: W. E. B. Du Bois and the Birth of Modern Sociology. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In Roberts, H. (ed.), Doing Feminist Research (pp. 30–61). Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pascoe, C. J. (2011). Dude, You’re a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ray, R. (2017). The Making of a Teenage Service Class: Poverty and Mobility in an American City. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ray, R. (2021). Ethnographers’ circle. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, March 19.Google Scholar
Small, M. L (2009). “How many cases do I need?”: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1): 5–38.Google Scholar
Small, M. L (2015). De-exoticizing ghetto poverty: On the ethics of representation in urban ethnography. City & Community, 14(4), 352–358.Google Scholar
Sprague, J. (1997). Holy men and big guns: The can(n)on in social theory. Gender & Society, 11(1), 88–107.Google Scholar
Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(1), 21–27.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, P. L. (2020). Who knows? Reflexivity in feminist standpoint theory and Bourdieu. Gender & Society, 34(6), 922–950.Google Scholar
Todd, Z. (2016). An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, E., McKenzie, M., & McCoy, K. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.877708Google Scholar
Qin, D. (2016). Positionality. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., O’Brien, B. C., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect: Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical education, 51(1), 40–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C. L. (1991). Case studies and the sociology of gender. In Feagin, J., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (eds.), A Case for the Case Study (pp. 224–243). University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by