Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Psychology Health and Illness
- Section 1 Psychological Aspects of Health and Illness
- Section 2 Psychological Assessment
- 39 Brain Imaging and Function
- 40 Diagnostic Interviews for Assessment of Mental Disorders in Clinical Practice
- 41 Disability Assessment
- 42 Health and Illness Cognitions
- 43 Health Status and Quality of Life Assessment
- 44 IQ Testing
- 45 Mood Assessment
- 46 Neuropsychological Assessment
- 47 Pain Assessment
- 48 Patient Outcomes Monitoring
- 49 Psychoneuroimmunology Assessment
- 50 Social Support Assessment
- 51 Stress and Coping Assessment
- Section 3 Psychological Interventions
- Section 4 Health Care Practice
- Part II Medical Topics
- Index
- References
51 - Stress and Coping Assessment
from Section 2 - Psychological Assessment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2019
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Psychology Health and Illness
- Section 1 Psychological Aspects of Health and Illness
- Section 2 Psychological Assessment
- 39 Brain Imaging and Function
- 40 Diagnostic Interviews for Assessment of Mental Disorders in Clinical Practice
- 41 Disability Assessment
- 42 Health and Illness Cognitions
- 43 Health Status and Quality of Life Assessment
- 44 IQ Testing
- 45 Mood Assessment
- 46 Neuropsychological Assessment
- 47 Pain Assessment
- 48 Patient Outcomes Monitoring
- 49 Psychoneuroimmunology Assessment
- 50 Social Support Assessment
- 51 Stress and Coping Assessment
- Section 3 Psychological Interventions
- Section 4 Health Care Practice
- Part II Medical Topics
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 229 - 236Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Brandtstädter, J. (1992). Personal control over development: implications of self-efficacy. In Schwarzer, R. (ed.), Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action (pp. 127–145). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Brown, G. W. & Harris, T. (1978). Social Origins of Depression: A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in Women. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92–100.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Pozo, C., Harris, S. D., et al. (1993). How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 375.Google Scholar
Cheetham, T. & Turner-Cobb, J. M. (2016). Panel manipulation in social stress testing: the Bath Experimental Stress Test for Children (BEST-C). Psychoneuroendocrinology, 63, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coddington, R. D. (1972). The significance of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of children. II. A study of a normal population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 16(3), 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor-Smith, J. K., Compas, B. E., Wadsworth, M. E., Thomsen, A. H. & Saltzman, H. (2000). Responses to stress in adolescence: measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 976.Google Scholar
Cooley, E., Toray, T. & Roscoe, L. (2010). Reactions to loss scale: assessing grief in college students. OMEGA: Journal of Death and Dying, 61(1), 25–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dedert, E., Lush, E., Anees, C., et al. (2012). Stress, coping, and circadian disruption among women awaiting breast cancer surgery. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 44(1), 10–20.Google Scholar
Entringer, S., Wust, S., Kumsta, R., et al. (2008). Prenatal psychosocial stress exposure is associated with insulin resistance in young adults. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 498, e491–497.Google Scholar
Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150–170.Google Scholar
Gassling, V., Holterhus, P.-M., Herbers, D., et al. (2012). Stress-coping and cortisol analysis in patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate: an explorative study. PloS One, 7(7), e41015.Google Scholar
Het, S., Rohleder, N., Schoofs, D., et al. (2009). Neuroendocrine and psychometric evaluation of a placebo version of the ‘Trier Social Stress Test’. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34, 1075–1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, T. H. & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N. & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41(3), 209–218.Google Scholar
Jonsson, P., Wallergard, M., Osterberg, K., et al. (2010). Cardiovascular and cortisol reactivity and habituation to a virtual reality version of the Trier Social Stress Test: a pilot study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35, 1397–1403.Google Scholar
Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., et al. (1981). Comparision of two modes of stress measurement: daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 1–39.Google Scholar
Kanner, A. D., Feldman, S. S., Weinberger, D. A., et al. (1987). Uplifts, hassles, and adaptational outcomes in early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, 371–394.Google Scholar
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Jaremka, L. M., Derry, H. M., et al. (2013). Telomere length: a marker of disease susceptibility? Brain, Behavior & Immunity, 34, 29–30.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M. & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’: a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28(1–2), 76–81.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, C., Tietze, A., Skoluda, N., et al. (2009). Hair as a retrospective calendar of cortisol production: increased cortisol incorporation into hair in the third trimester of pregnancy. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 32–37.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
McCubbin, H. I., Mccubbin, M. A., Patterson, J. M., et al. (1983). CHIP: Coping Health Inventory for Parents – an assessment of parental coping patterns in the care of the chronically ill child. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, B. S. (1998). Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(3), 171–179.Google Scholar
Montero-Lopez, E., Santos-Ruis, A., Garcia-Rios, M. C., et al. (2016). A virtual reality approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: contrasting two distinct protocols. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 223–232.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, K., Badrick, E., Kumari, M., et al. (2008). Psychological coping styles and cortisol over the day in healthy older adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33, 601–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, E. J. & Wong, P. T. (1990). The stress appraisal measure (SAM): a multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress Medicine, 6, 227–236.Google Scholar
Read, S. & Grundy, E. (2012). Allostatic load: a challenge to measure multisystem physiological dysregulation. NCRM Working Paper. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2879/1/NCRM_workingpaper_0412.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R. & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: a two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Robledillo, N., De Andres-Garcia, S., Perez-Blasco, J., et al. (2014). Highly resilient coping entails better perceived health, high social support and low morning cortisol levels in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(3), 686–695.Google Scholar
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A. & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415.Google Scholar
Skinner, E., Edge, K., Altman, J., et al. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sladek, M. R., Doane, L. D., Luecken, L. J., et al. (2016). Perceived stress, coping, and cortisol reactivity in daily life: a study of adolescents during the first year of college. Biological Psychology, 117, 8–15.Google Scholar
Slatcher, R. B., Chi, P., Li, X., et al. (2015). Associations between coping and diurnal cortisol among children affected by parental HIV/AIDS. Health Psychology, 34(8), 802.Google Scholar
Slavich, G. M. & Epel, E. S. (2010). The Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN): An Automated System for Assessing Cumulative Stress Exposure. Technical report. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Snoeren, F. & Hoefnagels, C. (2014). Measuring perceived social support and perceived stress among primary school children in the Netherlands. Child Indicators Research, 7(3), 473–486.Google Scholar
Spirito, A., Stark, L. J. & Williams, C. (1988). Development of a brief coping checklist for use with pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 13(4), 555–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterling, P. & Eyer, J. (1988). Allostasis: a new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. In Fisher, S. & Reason, J. (eds), Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health (pp. 629–649). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: a theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1161.Google Scholar
Tennant, C. & Andrews, G. (1976). A scale to measure the stress of life events. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 10, 27–32.Google Scholar
Turner-Cobb, J. M., Palmer, J., Aronson, D., et al. (2010). Diurnal cortisol and coping responses in close relatives of persons with acquired brain injury: a longitudinal mixed methods study. Brain Injury, 24(6), 893–903.Google Scholar
Turner-Cobb, J. M., Smith, P. C., Ramchandani, P., et al. (2016). The acute psychobiological impact of the intensive care experience on relatives. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 21 (1), 20–26.Google Scholar
von Dawans, B., Kirschbaum, C. & Heinrichs, M. (2011). The Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G): a new research tool for controlled simultaneous social stress exposure in a group format. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36, 514–522.Google Scholar
Wiemers, U. S., Schoofs, D. & Wolf, O. T. (2013). A friendly version of the Trier Social Stress Test does not activate the HPA axis in healthy men and women. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress, 16, 254–260.Google Scholar
Zeidner, M. & Endler, N. S. (1996). Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications (Vol. 195). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar