Ball, L., Bardsley, N. and Ormerod, T. (2012). Do Preference Reversals Generalise? Results on Ambiguity and Loss Aversion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bardsley, N., Cubitt, R., Loomes, G., Moffatt, P., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (2010). Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H. and MacDonald, D. N. (1985). Animals’ Choices over Uncertain Outcomes: Some Initial Experimental Results. American Economic Review, 75, 597–613.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (1978). A Realist Theory of Science. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Bhattacharjee, Y. (2013). The Mind of a Con Man. New York Times, 26 April.Google Scholar

Bornemann-Cimenti, H., Szilagyi, I. S. and Sandner-Kiesling, A. (2016). Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1063–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, M. J., Ijzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., …, and van’t Veer, A. (2014). The Replication Recipe: What Makes for a Convincing Replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, B. L., Martens, A., and Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-analysis of Mortality Salience Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 155–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Forsell, E., Ho, T. H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., ..., and Wu, H. (2016). Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in Economics. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf0918CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Collins, H. (1991). The Meaning of Replication and the Science of Economics. History of Political Economy, 23, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coyne, J. (2016). Replication Initiatives Will Not Salvage the Trustworthiness of Psychology. BioMed Central Psychology, 4, 28.Google ScholarPubMed

Cubitt, R. P. (2005). Experiments and the Domain of Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, S. T. (2016). A Call to Change Science’s Culture of Shaming. Association for Psychological Science Observer, 29(9), 5–6.Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., King, G., Pettigrew, S. and Wilson, T. D. (2016). Comment on ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science’. Science, 351, 1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glass, G. V. (2000). Meta-Analysis at 25. Retrieved 15 August 2016 from www.gvglass.info/papers/meta25.htmlGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, J. D. (1982). On the Relation Between Laboratory Experiments and Social Behaviour: Causal Explanation and Generalisation. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 12, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grether, D. and Plott, C. (1979). Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69, 623–638.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1739–40 [2007]) A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Norton, D. F. and Norton, M. J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. Public Library of Science – Medicine, 2, e124.Google ScholarPubMed

Johnson, D. J., Cheung, F. and Donellan, M. B. (2014). Does Cleanliness Influence Moral Judgements? A direct Replication of Schnall, Benton and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2014). A New Etiquette for Replication. Social Psychology, 45, 310–311.Google Scholar

Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results Are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K., Vianello, M. et al. (2014). Investigating Variation in Replicability: A ‘Many Labs’ Replication Project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, D., Conroy, M. L., McGreevy, B. P. and Barraclough, D. J. (2004). Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making in Monkeys a Competitive Game. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levelt, W. J. M., Drenth, P., and Noort, E. (Eds.). (2012). Flawed Science: The Fraudulent Research Practices of Social Psychologist Diederik Stapel. Tilburg: Commissioned by Tilburg University, the University of Amsterdam and the University of Groningen.Google Scholar

Lynott, D., Corker, K. S., Wortman, J., Connell, L., Donnellan, M. B., Lucas, R. E., and O’Brien, K. (2014). Replication of ‘Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth’ by Williams and Bargh (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nosek, B. A. and Lakens, D. (2014). Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science, 349, aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716Google Scholar

Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Plott, C. R. and Smith, V. L. (2008). Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. Volume 1. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.Google Scholar

Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred from Neuroimaging Data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenthal, R. and Fode, K. L. (1963). The Effect Experimenter Bias on the Performance of the Albino Rat. Behavioral Science, 8, 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenthal, R. and Jacobson, L. (1963). Teachers’ Expectancies: Determinants of Pupils’ IQ Gains. Psychological Reports, 19, 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanabria, F. and Thraikill, E. (2009). Pigeons (Columba livia) Approach Nash Equilibrium in Experimental Matching Pennies Competitions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall We Really Do It Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication Is Neglected in the Social Sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schnall, S. (2014). Commentary and Rejoinder on Johnson, Cheung and Donnellan (2014a). Clean Data: Statistical Artefacts Wash Out Replication Efforts. Social Psychology. Online article; doi: 10.1027/1864–9335/a000204Google Scholar

Schnall, S., Benton, J. and Harvey, S. (2008). With a Clean Conscience: Cleanliness Reduces the Severity of Moral Judgements. Psychological Science, 19, 1219–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sher, I., Koenig, M. and Rustichini, A. (2014). Children’s Strategic Theory of Mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 13307–13312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schram, A. (2005). Artificiality: The Tension between Internal and External Validity in Economic Experiments. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solomon, S., Greenberg, J. and Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 93–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapel, D. (2014). Faking Science: A True Story of Academic Fraud. Translated by N. J. L. Brown. Available at errorstatistics.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/fakingscience-20141214.pdfGoogle Scholar

Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, L. E. and Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth. Science, 322, 606–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilson, A. (2014). Psychology’s Real Replication Problem: Our Methods Sections. Online article at psychsciencenotes.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/psychologys-real-replication-problem.html accessed 01.08.2016Google Scholar