Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Foundations of Political Psychology
- Part II The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
- Part III Contemporary Challenges to Democracy
- 23 The Political Psychology of Inequality
- 24 How Social Class Influences Political Choices
- 25 Fear and Loathing in American Politics
- 26 Political Extremism
- 27 The Politics of Hate
- 28 Populism
- 29 A Cultural Theory of Autocracy-vs-Democracy
- 30 Psychological Theories Meet the Challenge of Persuading and Mobilising Voters
- 31 Collective Action for Social Change
- 32 Opinion Formation and Polarisation in the News Feed Era
- 33 Conspiracy Theory Belief and Conspiratorial Thinking
- 34 Political Psychology and the Climate Crisis
- 35 The Political Psychology of Cyberterrorism
- 36 Reconciliation in the Aftermath of Collective Violence
- Part IV Diversifying Perspectives in Political Psychology
- Index
- References
27 - The Politics of Hate
Derogatory Language in Politics and Intergroup Relations
from Part III - Contemporary Challenges to Democracy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Foundations of Political Psychology
- Part II The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
- Part III Contemporary Challenges to Democracy
- 23 The Political Psychology of Inequality
- 24 How Social Class Influences Political Choices
- 25 Fear and Loathing in American Politics
- 26 Political Extremism
- 27 The Politics of Hate
- 28 Populism
- 29 A Cultural Theory of Autocracy-vs-Democracy
- 30 Psychological Theories Meet the Challenge of Persuading and Mobilising Voters
- 31 Collective Action for Social Change
- 32 Opinion Formation and Polarisation in the News Feed Era
- 33 Conspiracy Theory Belief and Conspiratorial Thinking
- 34 Political Psychology and the Climate Crisis
- 35 The Political Psychology of Cyberterrorism
- 36 Reconciliation in the Aftermath of Collective Violence
- Part IV Diversifying Perspectives in Political Psychology
- Index
- References
Summary
Hate speech is a form of communication that targets disadvantaged social groups in a harmful way. It can be seen as a driving force behind the successes of numerous populist politicians and extremist movements. In this chapter, we argue that studying hate speech can be crucial for a better understanding of political mobilisation, intergroup relations, and social media. We describe the role of hate speech in mobilising electoral support and violence, in the promotion of racism and prejudice, as well as in shaping attitudes towards government policies. We uncover how political ideology and hate speech are interconnected, and that the left-right political beliefs do not always explain why individuals turn to use hate speech. We also outline the dilemma between the protection against hate speech and the freedom of expression principles, that are at the core of current debates on derogatory language.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology , pp. 429 - 441Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Ash, T. G. (2017). Free speech: Ten principles for a connected world. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2012). Moral disengagement. In Christie, D. J. (Ed.) The encyclopedia of peace psychology (pp. 1–5). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bartholow, B. D., Bushman, B. J., & Sestir, M. A. (2006). Chronic violent video game exposure and desensitization to violence: Behavioral and event-related brain potential data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.006Google Scholar
BBC. (2018, 1 January). Germany starts enforcing hate speech law. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42510868Google Scholar
Berendt, J. (2016, 3 October). Protesters in Poland rally against proposal for total abortion ban. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/04/world/europe/poland-abortion-black-monday.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, M., Piccoli, V., Zotti, D., Fasoli, F., & Carnaghi, A. (2017). The impact of homophobic labels on the internalized homophobia and body image of gay men: The moderation role of coming-out. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16654735Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M. (2019). Obedient authoritarians or lay Darwinists? Ideological motivations of genocide. In Newman, L. S. (Ed.), Confronting humanity at its worst: Social psychological perspectives on genocide (pp. 29–61). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190685942.003.0002Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., Kamińska, O. K., Winiewski, M., & Soral, W. (2017). From disgust to contempt-speech: The nature of contempt on the map of prejudicial emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 20–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000686CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilewicz, M., Marchlewska, M., Soral, W., & Winiewski, M. (2014). Hate speech in Poland 2014: Summary of the national opinion poll. Stefan Batory Foundation.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., & Soral, W. (2020). Hate speech epidemic: The dynamic effects of derogatory language on intergroup relations and political radicalization. Advances in Political Psychology, 41(S1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilewicz, M., Soral, W., Marchlewska, M., & Winiewski, M. (2017). When authoritarians confront prejudice: Differential effects of SDO and RWA on support for hate‐speech prohibition. Political Psychology, 38(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46, 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7Google Scholar
Bulska, D., & Winiewski, M. (2018). Irrational critique of Israel and Palestine: New clothes for traditional prejudice? Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i1.25497Google Scholar
Clement, J. (2020). Number of global social network users 2010-2023 [Data set]. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/Google Scholar
Cohen, F., Jussim, L., Harber, K. D., & Bhasin, G. (2009). Modern anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe. (1997). Recommendation No. R (97) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on ‘Hate Speech’. https://rm.coe.int/1680505d5bGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–114). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.xGoogle Scholar
Facebook. (2021). Community standards – hate speech. https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/hate_speech/Google Scholar
Fasoli, F., Maass, A., & Carnaghi, A. (2015). Labelling and discrimination: Do homophobic epithets undermine fair distribution of resources? British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12090Google Scholar
Fasoli, F., Paladino, M. P., Carnaghi, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., & Bain, P. G. (2016). Not ‘just words’: Exposure to homophobic epithets leads to dehumanizing and physical distancing from gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritze, J. (2019). Trump used words like ‘invasion’ and ‘killer’ to discuss immigrants at rallies 500 times. USA TODAY. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/08/08/trump-immigrants-rhetoric-criticized-el-paso-dayton-shootings/1936742001/Google Scholar
Gervais, M. M., & Fessler, D. M. (2017). On the deep structure of social affect: Attitudes, emotions, sentiments, and the case of ‘contempt’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000352Google Scholar
Gorwa, R. (2017). Computational propaganda in Poland: False amplifiers and the digital public sphere [Working Paper No. 2017.4]. University of Oxford, Computational Propaganda Research Project.Google Scholar
Grabowski, J. (2009). German anti-Jewish propaganda in the Generalgouvernement, 1939–1945: Inciting hate through posters, films, and exhibitions. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 23(3), 381–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/HGS/DCP040Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1985). The effect of an overheard ethnic slur on evaluations of the target: How to spread a social disease. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90006-XGoogle Scholar
Hawdon, J., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2017). Exposure to online hate in four nations: A cross-national consideration. Deviant Behavior, 38(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1196985Google Scholar
Herf, J. (2006). The Jewish enemy: Nazi propaganda during World War II and the Holocaust. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2020). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896491Google Scholar
Jacobs, J., & Potter, K. (1998). Hate crimes: Criminal law and identity politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. F., Leahy, R., Johnson Restrepo, N. J., et al. (2019). Hidden resilience adaptive dynamics of the global online hate ecology. Nature, 573, 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1494-7Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaakinen, M., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2018). Did the risk of exposure to online hate increase after the November 2015 Paris attacks? A group relations approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.022Google Scholar
Kempf, W. (2012). Antisemitism and criticism of Israel: A methodological challenge for peace research. Journal for the Study of Antisemitism, 4(2), 515–532.Google Scholar
Kirkland, S. L., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1987). Further evidence of the deleterious effects of overheard derogatory ethnic labels: Derogation beyond the target. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(2), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287132007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kteily, N., & Bruneau, E. (2017). Backlash: The politics and real-world consequences of minority group dehumanization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216675334Google Scholar
Leader, T., Mullen, B., & Rice, D. (2009). Complexity and valence in ethnophaulisms and exclusion of ethnic out-groups: What puts the ‘hate’ into hate speech? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013066Google Scholar
Leets, L. (2002). Experiencing hate speech: Perceptions and responses to anti-Semitism and antigay speech. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemarchand, R. (2002). Disconnecting the threads: Rwanda and the Holocaust reconsidered. Journal of Genocide Research, 4(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/146235022000000436Google Scholar
Levene, M. (1998). Creating a modern ‘zone of genocide’: The impact of nation-and state-formation on eastern Anatolia, 1878–1923. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 12(3), 393–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/HGS/12.3.393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathew, B., Dutt, R., Goyal, P., & Mukherjee, A. (2019, June). Spread of hate speech in online social media. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on web science (pp. 173–182). https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326034Google Scholar
Mullen, B., & Rice, D. R. (2003). Ethnophaulisms and exclusion: The behavioral consequences of cognitive representation of ethnic immigrant groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(8), 1056–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, B., & Smyth, J. M. (2004). Immigrant suicide rates as a function of ethnophaulisms: Hate speech predicts death. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(6), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000126197.59447.b3Google Scholar
Nockleby, J. T. (2000). Hate speech. In Levy, K., Karst, K., & Mahoney, D. J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the American constitution (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1277–1279). Macmillan.Google Scholar
Oksanen, A., Hawdon, J., Holkeri, E., Näsi, M., & Räsänen, P. (2014). Exposure to online hate among young social media users. In Warehime, N. M. (Ed.), Soul of society: A focus on the lives of children & youth (Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, Vol. 18, pp. 253–273). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-466120140000018021Google Scholar
Oksanen, A., Kaakinen, M., Minkkinen, J., Räsänen, P., Enjolras, B., & Steen-Johnsen, K. (2020). Perceived societal fear and cyberhate after the November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1047–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1442329Google Scholar
Piliavin, I. M., Rodin, J., & Piliavin, J. A. (1969). Good samaritanism: An underground phenomenon? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028433CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M., Confessore, N., & Cadwalladr, C. (2018, 17 March). How Trump consultants exploited the Facebook data of millions. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.htmlGoogle Scholar
Simon, L., & Greenberg, J. (1996). Further progress in understanding the effects of derogatory ethnic labels: The role of preexisting attitudes toward the targeted group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212001Google Scholar
Soral, W., Bilewicz, M., & Winiewski, M. (2018). Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desensitization. Aggressive Behavior, 44(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21737Google Scholar
Soral, W., Bilewicz, M., Winiewski, M., & Bulska, D. (2020). Family acceptance as a buffer against hate-speech induced depression [Manuscript submitted for publication].Google Scholar
Soral, W., Liu, J. H., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Media of contempt: Social media consumption increases normativity of xenophobic verbal violence. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 14. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3774Google Scholar
Stola, D. (2006). Anti-Zionism as a multipurpose policy instrument: The anti-Zionist campaign in Poland, 1967–1968. The Journal of Israeli History, 25(1), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13531040500503021Google Scholar
Straus, S. (2006). The order of genocide: race, power and war in Rwanda. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801467158Google Scholar
Timberg, C., & Dwoskin, E. (2020, 10 July). Silicon Valley is getting tougher on Trump and his supporters over hate speech and disinformation. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/07/10/hate-speech-trump-tech/Google Scholar
Twitter. (2021). Hateful conduct policy. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policyGoogle Scholar
Vargas, J. A. (2012, 17 February). Spring awakening. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/books/review/how-an-egyptian-revolution-began-on-facebook.htmlGoogle Scholar
Winiewski, M., Hansen, K., Bilewicz, M., Soral, W., Świderska, A., & Bulska, D. (2017). Contempt speech, hate speech: Report from research on verbal violence against minority groups. Stefan Batory Foundation.Google Scholar
Winiewski, M., Soral, W., & Bilewicz, M. (2015). Conspiracy theories on the map of stereotype content. In Bilewicz, M., Cichocka, A., & Soral, W. (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 23–41). Routledge.Google Scholar
Wypych, M., Zochniak, K., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Mowa nienawiści jako stygmatyzacja: Doświadczenia kontaktu z mową nienawiści wśród studentów zagranicznych oraz imigrantów w Polsce [Hate speech as a stigma: The experience of contact with hate speech among foreign students and immigrants in Poland]. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 64(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2020.64.3.10Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by