Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:30:00.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Foundations of Political Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

Edited by
Danny Osborne  and
Chris G. Sibley
Danny Osborne
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Chris G. Sibley
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology , pp. 1 - 174
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058772Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2022). The structure, prevalence, and nature of mass belief systems. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bastian, A. (1860). Der Mensch in der Geschichte: Zur Begründung einer psychologischen Weltanschauung. Otto Wigand.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., & Soral, W. (2022). The politics of hate: Derogatory language in politics and intergroup relations. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bizumic, B., & Sheppard, H. (2022). A political psychology of ethnocentrism. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, C. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2022). The developmental science of politics: Insights from the 2016 US presidential election. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chong, D., & Mullinix, K. J. (2022). Rational choice and information processing. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christ, O., Schmid, K., & Green, E. G. T. (2022). Macro-diversity and intergroup attitudes. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2022). The evolutionary basis of political ideology. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, L., DeMora, S. L., & Long, S. (2022). Demographic change, white decline, and the changing nature of racial politics in election campaigns. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). The Free Press.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. (2022). Authoritarianism: Conceptualisation, research, and new developments. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunaway, J., & Settle, J. E. (2022). Opinion formation and polarisation in the news feed era: Effects from digital, social, and mobile media. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eker, I., Cichocka, A., & Cislak, A. (2022). Collective narcissism: How being narcissistic about your groups shapes politics, group processes and intergroup relations. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G., & Opacic, A. (2022). How social class influences political choices. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farhart, C. E. (2022). Conspiracy theory belief and conspiratorial thinking. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Federico, C. M. (2022). The personality basis of political preferences. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, N., Gruszczynski, M., & Swim, J. K. (2022). Political psychology and the climate crisis. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gidengil, E., & Stolle, D. (2022. Populism. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2008). Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout (2nd ed.). Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., & Gomez, J. S. (2022). Psychological theories meet the challenge of persuading and mobilising voters. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, B. E., Wisneski, D. C., & Morgan, G. S. (2022). The consequences of moral conviction in politics: More negative than positive? In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, E., Pärnamets, P., Sternisko, A., Robertson, C., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2022). The psychology and neuroscience of partisanship. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawi, D. R., Bou Zeineddine, F., Saab, R., Ayanian, A. H., & Harb, C. (2022). Political psychology in the Arab region: A commentary on navigating research in unstable contexts. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029aGoogle Scholar
Howe, L. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2022). The psychology of public opinion. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (2022). Fear and loathing in American politics: A review of affective polarisation. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. (2022). Two sides of the same coin: A new look at differences and similarities across political ideology. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1927). Propaganda technique in the world war. K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company, Ltd.Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. (1896). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Malka, A. (2022). Religiosity and openness to authoritarian governance. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. (2022). Genetic contributions to political phenomena. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, S. (2022). International and individual differences in support for human rights. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merriam, C. E. (1925). New aspects of politics. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, A., & Barr, K. (2022). Rethinking group dynamics: The Cuban Missile Crisis revisited. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, A., & Mograbi, E. (2015). Political Psychology: Submissions, acceptances, downloads, and citations. Political Psychology, 36(3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12277Google Scholar
Osborne, D., Becker, J. C., Bahamondes, J., & García-Sánchez, E. (2022). The political psychology of inequality: Why rising rates of economic inequality affect our health and democracy. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, D., García-Sánchez, E., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Identifying the psychological mechanisms underlying the effects of inequality on society: The Macro-micro model of Inequality and RElative Deprivation (MIRED). In Jetten, J. & Peters, K. (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 249–266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_16Google Scholar
Osborne, D., Sengupta, N., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). System justification theory at 25: Evaluating a paradigm shift in psychology and looking forward. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12302Google Scholar
Osborne, D., Sibley, C. G., & Sengupta, N. K. (2015). Income and neighbourhood-level inequality predict self-esteem and ethnic identity centrality through individual- and group-based relative deprivation: A multilevel path analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2087Google Scholar
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001Google Scholar
Quayle, M., Pautz, N., & Mhlongo, B. (2020). A coauthorship analysis of internationalization in political psychology through the lens of ISPP dissemination activities. Political Psychology, 41(5), 901–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12656Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P., & Mattes, K. (2022). Emotions and politics. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, K. J. (2018). Looking back, looking forward: ISPP at 40 and future directions for political psychology. Political Psychology, 39(4), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12509Google Scholar
Reynolds, K. J., & Yeow, C. J. L. (2018). Where have we come from and where are we heading? An examination of ISPP as a diverse and international society. ISPP Governing Council. https://www.ispp.org/uploads/attachments/UPDATED_Final_ISPP_Diversity_Report_2018_Recd_July2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rivera Pichardo, E. J., Vargas Salfate, S., & Jost, J. T. (2022). Political psychology in the Global South: Collective memory, intergroup relations, ideology, and political participation. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, K., & Sanbonmatsu, K. (2022). The persistence of gender in campaigns and elections. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shandler, R., Snider, K. L. G., & Canetti, D. (2022). The political psychology of cyberterrorism. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sutton, R. M., Murphy, A. O., Petterson, A., & Douglas, K. M. (2022). The politics of abortion, pregnancy, and motherhood. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Louis, W. R., & McGarty, C. (2022). Collective action for social change: Individual, groups and contextual factors shaping collective action and its outcomes. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tileagă, C., & Augoustinos, M. (2022). Critical perspective in political psychology. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valentino, N. A., & Kim, Y. P. (2022). The political dynamics of immigration opinion worldwide. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2022). Political extremism. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R., Jeong, H. Y., & Bilail, R. (2022). Reconciliation in the aftermath of collective violence. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Welzel, C. (2022). A cultural theory of autocracy-vs-democracy: On the psychological foundations of political regimes. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yogeeswaran, K., & Verkuyten, M. (2022). The political psychology of national identity. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Aktipis, A., Cronk, L., Alcock, J., et al. (2018). Understanding cooperation through fitness interdependence. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–018-0378-4Google Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579Google Scholar
Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10(10), 1246–1247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1979Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Danso, H. A., Maio, G. R., Esses, V. M., Bond, M. H., & Keung, D. K. Y. (2005). Two dimensions of political attitudes and their individual difference correlates: A cross-cultural perspective. In Sorrentino, R. M., Cohen, D., Olsen, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Culture and social behavior: The Ontario symposium (pp. 1–29). (Ontario Symposia on Personality and Social Psychology Series; Vol. 10). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612793Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, Article 823. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-0823-zGoogle Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bas-Hoogendam, J. M., Steenbergen, H. V., Kreuk, T., van der Wee, N. J. A., & Westenberg, P. M. (2017). How embarrassing! The behavioral and neural correlates of processing social norm violations. PLoS ONE, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176326Google Scholar
Batrićević, N., & Littvay, L. (2017). A genetic basis of economic egalitarianism. Social Justice Research, 30(4), 408–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211–017-0297-yGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442(7105), 912–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04981Google Scholar
Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.005Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (1993). Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Current Anthropology, 34(3), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/204166Google Scholar
Borg, J. S., Lieberman, D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2008). Infection, incest, and iniquity: Investigating the neural correlates of disgust and morality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(9), 1529–1546. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20109Google Scholar
Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510932Google Scholar
Bromham, L., Hua, X., Cardillo, M., Schneemann, H., & Greenhill, S. J. (2018). Parasites and politics: Why cross-cultural studies must control for relatedness, proximity and covariation. Royal Society Open Science, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181100Google Scholar
Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Burkart, J. M., Brügger, R. K., & van Schaik, C. P. (2018). Evolutionary origins of morality: Insights from non-human primates. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00017Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01138.xGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Wiley.Google Scholar
Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(10), 3721–3726. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710069105Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2020). The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–020-0850-9Google Scholar
Claidière, N., & Whiten, A. (2012). Integrating the study of conformity and culture in humans and nonhuman animals. Psychological Bulletin, 138(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025868Google Scholar
Conway, L. G., Chan, L., & Woodard, S. R. (2020). Socio-ecological influences on political ideology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.034Google Scholar
Cronk, L., & Leech, B. L. (2013). Meeting at Grand Central: Understanding the social and evolutionary roots of cooperation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawes, C. T., Loewen, P. J., Schreiber, D., et al. (2012). Neural basis of egalitarian behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(17), 6479–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118653109Google Scholar
Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 23(2), 744–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.025Google Scholar
Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2016). How the mind makes welfare tradeoffs: Evolution, computation, and emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.06.006Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., Weber, C. R., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. (2013). Mapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Political Psychology, 34(4), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12006Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090–5138(04)00005-4Google Scholar
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000021Google Scholar
Fodor, E. M., Wick, D. P., Hartsen, K. M., & Preve, R. M. (2008). Right-wing authoritarianism in relation to proposed judicial action, electromyographic response, and affective attitudes toward a schizophrenic mother. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(1), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00303.xGoogle Scholar
Foerster, S., Franz, M., Murray, C. M., et al. (2016). Chimpanzee females queue but males compete for social status. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 35404. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35404Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., et al. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754Google Scholar
Geniole, S. N., MacDonell, E. T., & McCormick, C. M. (2017). The threat premium in economic bargaining. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.004Google Scholar
Gilby, I. C. (2006). Meat sharing among the Gombe chimpanzees: Harassment and reciprocal exchange. Animal Behaviour, 71(4), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.09.009Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1982). Order without law. In Gruter, M. & Bohannan, P. (Eds.), Law, biology and culture: The evolution of law (pp. 50–62). Ross-Erikson, Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281Google Scholar
Grünhage, T., & Reuter, M. (2020). Political orientation is associated with behavior in public-goods- and trust-games. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–020-09606-5Google Scholar
Gurven, M. (2004). Reciprocal altruism and food sharing decisions among Hiwi and Ache hunter-gatherers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56(4), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265–004-0793-6Google Scholar
Gurven, M., Rueden, C. von, Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Vie, M. L. (2013). How universal is the big five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030841Google Scholar
Haesevoets, T., Folmer, C. R., & Van Hiel, A. (2015). Cooperation in mixed-motive games: The role of individual differences in selfish and social orientation. European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1992Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Halali, E., Dorfman, A., Jun, S., & Halevy, N. (2018). More for us or more for me? Social dominance as parochial egoism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732819Google Scholar
Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J. R., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees. Nature, 476(7360), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10278Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001\_3Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Byrne, E., & McDermott, R. (2012). Introduction: What is a ‘gene’ and why does it matter for political science? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629812437752Google Scholar
Haun, D. B. M., Rekers, Y., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Majority-biased transmission in chimpanzees and human children, but not orangutans. Current Biology, 22(8), 727–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.006Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2015). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.195747Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152XGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., & McElreath, R. (2003). The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12(3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.10110Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2013). Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203112137Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192Google Scholar
Hodson, G., Choma, B. L., Boisvert, J., Hafer, C. L., MacInnis, C. C., & Costello, K. (2013). The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.002Google Scholar
Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18(8), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.xGoogle Scholar
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802110007Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611429024Google Scholar
Jensen, K., Vaish, A., & Schmidt, M. F. H. (2014). The emergence of human prosociality: Aligning with others through feelings, concerns, and norms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 822. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00822Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Ni Sullivan, B. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.127Google Scholar
Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Rees, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21(8), 677–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.017Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(30), 12577–12580. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705345104Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Shutts, K., Dejesus, J., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623Google Scholar
Koomen, R., & Herrmann, E. (2018). An investigation of children’s strategies for overcoming the tragedy of the commons. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(5), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–018-0327-2Google Scholar
Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2017). The temporal stability of in-group favoritism is mostly attributable to genetic factors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617699250Google Scholar
Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006a). Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science, 311(5765), 1297–1300. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123007Google Scholar
Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006b). Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: Tolerance constraints on cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 72(2), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.09.018Google Scholar
Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Chimpanzees coordinate in a negotiation game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(6), 381–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.05.003Google Scholar
Morgan, T. J. H., Rendell, L. E., Ehn, M., Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2011). The evolutionary basis of human social learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1729), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1172Google Scholar
Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2012). Threat(s) and conformity deconstructed: Perceived threat of infectious disease and its implications for conformist attitudes and behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.863Google Scholar
Navarrete, C. D., & Fessler, D. M. (2006). Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.12.001Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61(6), 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., et al. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14001356Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560–1563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133755Google Scholar
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627Google Scholar
Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2017). The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1600234XGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M. B. (2015). Evolutionary political psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 1–19). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., & Laustsen, L. (2019). Upper-body strength and political egalitarianism: Twelve conceptual replications. Political Psychology, 40(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12505Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the American public. https://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/Google Scholar
Pollet, T. V., Tybur, J. M., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Rickard, I. J. (2014). What can cross-cultural correlations teach us about human nature? Human Nature, 25(3), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110–014-9206-3Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741Google Scholar
Price, M. E., Kang, J., Dunn, J., & Hopkins, S. (2011). Muscularity and attractiveness as predictors of human egalitarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 636–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.009Google Scholar
Price, M. E., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Sidnaius, J., & Pound, N. (2017). Is sociopolitical egalitarianism related to bodily and facial formidability in men? Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.04.001Google Scholar
Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: Young children’s awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.875Google Scholar
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., et al. (2016). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400106XGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. The University of Chicago Press. http://hdl.handle.net/10822/547797Google Scholar
Riedl, K., Jensen, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2012). No third-party punishment in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(37), 14824–14829. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203179109Google Scholar
Schaller, M., & Park, J. H. (2011). The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402596Google Scholar
Schulman, G. I. (1967). Asch conformity studies: Conformity to the experimenter and/or to the group? Sociometry, 30(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786436Google Scholar
Scott, J., & Lockard, J. S. (2007). Competition coalitions and conflict interventions among captive female gorillas. International Journal of Primatology, 28(4), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764–007-9161-5Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E., & West, S. A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and the ultimate-proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393528Google Scholar
Service, E. R. (1962). Primitive social organization: An evolutionary perspective. Random House.Google Scholar
Silk, J. B., Brosnan, S. F., Vonk, J., et al. (2005). Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature, 437(7063), 1357–1359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04243Google Scholar
Sinn, J. S., & Hayes, M. W. (2017). Replacing the moral foundations: An evolutionary-coalitional theory of liberal-conservative differences. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12361Google Scholar
Snell-Rood, E. C. (2013). An overview of the evolutionary causes and consequences of behavioural plasticity. Animal Behaviour, 85(5), 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.031Google Scholar
Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E. W., & Kenrick, D. T. (2018). The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation. Psychological Review, 125(5), 714–743. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000104Google Scholar
Stanford, C. B. (1998). The social behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos: Empirical evidence and shifting assumptions. Current Anthropology, 39(4), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1086/204757Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2007). Social intelligence, human intelligence and niche construction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2006Google Scholar
Terrizzi, J. A., Shook, N. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.003Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.xGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 53(6), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1086/668207Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812Google Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., Aarøe, L., et al. (2016). Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(44), 12408–12413. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607398113Google Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Merriman, L. A., Hooper, A. E. C., McDonald, M. M., & Navarrete, C. D. (2010). Extending the behavioral immune system to political psychology: Are political conservatism and disgust sensitivity really related? Evolutionary Psychology, 8(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/epjournal-1329 [pii]Google Scholar
Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children’s responses to guilt displays. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1248–1262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024462Google Scholar
Van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., et al. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299(5603), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078004Google Scholar
Van Wilgenburg, E., Torres, C. W., & Tsutsui, N. D. (2010). The global expansion of a single ant supercolony. Evolutionary Applications, 3(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00114.xGoogle Scholar
Wallace, B., Cesarini, D., Lichtenstein, P., & Johannesson, M. (2007). Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(40), 15631–15634. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706642104Google Scholar
Warneken, F., Chen, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. Child Development, 77(3), 640–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00895.xGoogle Scholar
Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311(5765), 1301–1303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121448Google Scholar
Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2014). The hidden agenda of the political mind: How self-interest shapes our opinions and why we won’t admit it. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851966Google Scholar
Westermarck, E. (1891). The history of human marriage. Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Whiten, A., Spiteri, A., Horner, V., et al. (2007). Transmission of multiple traditions within and between chimpanzee groups. Current Biology, 17(12), 1038–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.031Google Scholar

References

Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167.Google Scholar
Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2011). The politics of mate choice. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 362–379.Google Scholar
Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2004). The origin of politics: An evolutionary theory of political behavior. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 707–723.Google Scholar
Alink, L. R., Mesman, J., Van Zeijl, J., et al. (2006). The early childhood aggression curve: Development of physical aggression in 10‐to 50‐month‐old children. Child Development, 77(4), 954–966.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (2006). Politics. ReadHowYouWant.com.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C. (2012). A hierarchical model of the evolution of human brain specializations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(Suppl. 1), 10733–10740.Google Scholar
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection: Opposites are sometimes said to attract, but in fact we are likely to marry someone who is similar to us in almost every variable. American Scientist, 73(1), 47–51.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Wiley.Google Scholar
Cyranoski, D. (2020, 3 January). What CRISPR-baby prison sentences mean for research. Nature.Google Scholar
Devkota, S., & Chang, E. B. (2015). Interactions between diet, bile acid metabolism, gut microbiota, and inflammatory bowel diseases. Digestive Diseases, 33(3), 351–356.Google Scholar
Dodd, M. D., Balzer, A., Jacobs, C. M., Gruszczynski, M. W., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2012). The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: Connecting physiology and cognition to preferences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 640–649.Google Scholar
Eaves, L., D’Onofrio, B., & Russell, R. (1999). Transmission of religion and attitudes. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 2(2), 59–61.Google Scholar
Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2008). Transmission of attitudes toward abortion and gay rights: Effects of genes, social learning and mate selection. Behavior Genetics, 38(3), 247–256.Google Scholar
Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2011). Do we choose our spouse based on our in‐laws? Resolving the effects of family background and spousal choice for educational attainment, religious practice, and political preference. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1253–1278.Google Scholar
Elia, A., Wilson, O. J., Lees, M., et al. (2019). Skeletal muscle, haematological and splenic volume characteristics of elite breath-hold divers. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 119(11–12), 2499–2511.Google Scholar
Fowler, J. H., & Dawes, C. T. (2013). In defense of genopolitics. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 362–374.Google Scholar
Fowler, J. H., & Schreiber, D. (2008). Biology, politics, and the emerging science of human nature. Science, 322(5903), 912–914.Google Scholar
Funk, C. (2020, 12 February). Key findings about Americans’ confidence in science and their views on scientists’ role in society. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/12/key-findings-about-americans-confidence-in-science-and-their-views-on-scientists-role-in-society/Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Crabtree, C., & McDermott, R. (2017). The relationship between sexual preferences and political orientations: Do positions in the bedroom affect positions in the ballot box? Personality and Individual Differences, 105(15), 318–325.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Funk, C. L., Medland, S. E., et al. (2009). Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes over a life time. The Journal of Politics 71(3), 1141–1156.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Gillespie, N. A., Eaves, L. J., et al. (2011). A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 271–285.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Medland, S. E., et al. (2010). Not by twins alone: Using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 798–814.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (Eds.). (2011a). Man is by nature a political animal: Evolution, biology, and politics. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2011b). The normative implications of biological research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(2), 325–329.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2012a). The genetics of politics: Discovery, challenges, and progress. Trends in Genetics, 28(10), 525–533.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P., & McDermott, R. (2012b). Policing the perimeter: Disgust and purity in democratic debate. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(4), 675–687.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2016). Give me attitudes. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 331–350.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., McDermott, R., Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2012). The different effects of gender and sex on vote choice. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1), 76–92.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., McDermott, R., Eaves, L. J., Kendler, K. S., & Neale, M. C. (2013). Fear as a disposition and an emotional state: A genetic and environmental approach to out‐group political preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 279–293.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Klemmensen, R., et al. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations. Behavior Genetics, 44(3), 282–294.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Negativity bias and political preferences: A response to commentators. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 333–350.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 714–725.Google Scholar
Klofstad, C. A., McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Do bedroom eyes wear political glasses? The role of politics in human mate attraction. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(2), 100–108.Google Scholar
Klofstad, C. A., McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2013). The dating preferences of liberals and conservatives. Political Behavior, 35(3), 519–538.Google Scholar
Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Heath, A. C., Jardine, R., Feingold, L. M., & Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Transmission of social attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83(12), 4364–4368.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2011). Distinguishing sex and gender. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(1), 89–92.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2014a). The study of international politics in the neurobiological revolution: A review of leadership and political violence. Millennium, 43(1), 92–123.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2014b). Political ecology: On the mutual formation of biology and culture. Political Psychology, 35(3), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00901.xGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2017). The relationship between physical aggression, foreign policy and moral choices: Phenotypic and genetic findings. Aggressive Behavior, 43(1), 37–46.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2018). DNA is not destiny. In Hopcroft, R. L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evolution, biology, and society (pp. 241–263). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., Lopez, A. C., & Hatemi, P. K. (2016). An evolutionary approach to political leadership. Security Studies, 25(4), 677–698.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., Tingley, D., & Hatemi, P. K. (2014). Assortative mating on ideology could operate through olfactory cues. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 997–1005.Google Scholar
Morgan, X. C., Segata, N., & Huttenhower, C. (2013). Biodiversity and functional genomics in the human microbiome. Trends in Genetics, 29(1), 51–58.Google Scholar
Oosterhoff, B., Shook, N. J., & Ford, C. (2018). Is that disgust I see? Political ideology and biased visual attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 336, 227–235.Google Scholar
Penn, D., & Potts, W. (1998). How do major histocompatibility complex genes influence odor and mating preferences? Advances in Immunology, 69(41), 411–436.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B. (2012). Social welfare as small‐scale help: Evolutionary psychology and the deservingness heuristic. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Schreiber, D., Fonzo, G., Simmons, A. N., et al. (2013). Red brain, blue brain: Evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans. PLoS ONE, 8(2), Article e52970.Google Scholar
Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8(3), 204–210.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. D., & Patterson, J. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7(4), 264–269.Google Scholar

References

Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Muñoz, J. (2013). Turning a blind eye: Experimental evidence of partisan bias in attitudes toward corruption. Comparative Political Studies, 46(12), 1664–1692.Google Scholar
Anwar, S., Bayer, P., & Hjalmarsson, R. (2012). The impact of jury race in criminal trials. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2), 1017–1055.Google Scholar
Barberá, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political Analysis, 23(1), 76–91.Google Scholar
Baron, J., & Jost, J. T. (2019). False equivalence: Are liberals and conservatives in the United States equally biased? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 292–303.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952–1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 35–50.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.Google Scholar
Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. Demos.Google Scholar
Bartra, O., McGuire, J. T., & Kable, J. W. (2013). The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage, 76, 412–427.Google Scholar
Blais, A., & Young, R. (1999). Why do people vote? An experiment in rationality. Public Choice, 99(1–2), 39–55.Google Scholar
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-country trends in affective polarization (No. w26669). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26669.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444.Google Scholar
Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108–117.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (2020, 24 April). Most Democrats who are looking for a relationship would not consider dating a Trump voter. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/24/most-democrats-who-are-looking-for-a-relationship-would-not-consider-dating-a-trump-voter/Google Scholar
Brown, D. (1991). Human universals. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G. (2007). Experiments on partisanship and public opinion: Party cues, false beliefs, and Bayesian updating [Ph.D. dissertation]. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G. (2009). Partisan bias and the Bayesian ideal in the study of public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1109–1124.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578.Google Scholar
Carlson, E. (2015). Ethnic voting and accountability in Africa: A choice experiment in Uganda. World Politics, 67(2), 353–385.Google Scholar
Carlson, E. (2016). Finding partisanship where we least expect it: Evidence of partisan bias in a new African democracy. Political Behavior, 38(1), 129–154.Google Scholar
Chawke, C., & Kanai, R. (2016). Alteration of political belief by non-invasive brain stimulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 621.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., & Li, S. X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99(1), 431–457.Google Scholar
Che, Y. K., & Mierendorff, K. (2019). Optimal dynamic allocation of attention. American Economic Review, 109(8), 2993–3029.Google Scholar
Cikara, M., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). The neuroscience of intergroup relations: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 245–274.Google Scholar
Cikara, M., Van Bavel, J. J., Ingbretsen, Z. A., & Lau, T. (2017). Decoding ‘us’ and ‘them’: Neural representations of generalized group concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(5), 621–631.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822.Google Scholar
Coppock, A. E. (2016). Positive, small, homogeneous, and durable: Political persuasion in response to information [Doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University.Google Scholar
Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). On the precipice of a ‘majority-minority’ America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1189–1197.Google Scholar
DeSilver, D. (2013, 17 July). Partisan polarization, in Congress and among public, is greater than ever. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/07/17/partisan-polarization-in-congress-and-among-public-is-greater-than-ever/Google Scholar
DeSilver, D. (2017, 3 November). US trails most developed countries in voter turnout. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/11/03/in-past-elections-u-s-trailed-most-developed-countries-in-voter-turnout/Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., et al. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Duran, N. D., Nicholson, S. P., & Dale, R. (2017). The hidden appeal and aversion to political conspiracies as revealed in the response dynamics of partisans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 268–278.Google Scholar
Edelson, J., Alduncin, A., Krewson, C., Sieja, J. A., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The effect of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 933–946.Google Scholar
Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2018). On the measurement of conspiracy beliefs. Research & Politics, 5(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2019). Informational cues, partisan-motivated reasoning, and the manipulation of conspiracy beliefs. Political Communication, 36(1), 83–102.Google Scholar
Enders, A. M., Smallpage, S. M., & Lupton, R. N. (2020). Are all ‘birthers’ conspiracy theorists? On the relationship between conspiratorial thinking and political orientations. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 849–855.Google Scholar
Fazio, L. K., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1705–1710.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, A., & Green, D. P. (1998). Rational learning and partisan attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 794–818.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., & Huber, G. A. (2010). Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 153–173.Google Scholar
Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Meier, S. (2012). The impact of social ties on group interactions: Evidence from minimal groups and randomly assigned real groups. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4(1), 101–115.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, A., Martel, C., Brady, W. J., et al. (2020). Partisan differences in physical distancing predict infections and mortality during the coronavirus pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 1186–1197.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, J. (2018). Understanding active sampling strategies: Empirical approaches and implications for attention and decision research. Cortex, 102, 150–160.Google Scholar
Graf, J., & Aday, S. (2008). Selective attention to online political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(1), 86–100.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1049.Google Scholar
Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20(2), 393–403.Google Scholar
Greene, S. (2002). The social-psychological measurement of partisanship. Political Behavior, 24(3), 171–197.Google Scholar
Harris, E., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2021). Preregistered replication of ‘feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority’. Psychological Science, 32(3), 451–458.Google Scholar
Hartstone, M., & Augoustinos, M. (1995). The minimal group paradigm: Categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(2), 179–193.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Klemmensen, R., et al. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations. Behavior Genetics, 44(3), 282–294.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. (2020, 17 May). Eric Trump claims coronavirus is Democratic hoax, will ‘magically’ vanish after 2020 election. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/17/eric-trump-coronavirus/Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2013). Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hornsby, A. N., & Love, B. C. (2020). How decisions and the desire for coherency shape subjective preferences over time. Cognition, 200, 104244.Google Scholar
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. (2017, 2 November). ‘Fake news’ named Collins Dictionary’s official Word of the Year for 2017. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fake-news-word-of-the-year-2017-collins-dictionary-donald-trump-kellyanne-conway-antifa-corbynmania-a8032751.htmlGoogle Scholar
Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2021). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 71–79.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Krupenkin, M. (2018). The strengthening of partisan affect. Political Psychology, 39(4), 201–218.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. (2006). Party identification: Unmoved mover or sum of preferences? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 329–351.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Hennes, E. P., & Lavine, H. (2013). ‘Hot’ political cognition: Its self-, group-, and system-serving purposes. In Carlston, D. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 851–875). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Noorbaloochi, S., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). The ‘chicken-and-egg’ problem in political neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 317–318.Google Scholar
Jurkowitz, M., Mitchell, A., Shearer, E., & Walker, M. (2020). US media polarization and the 2020 election: A nation divided. Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86.Google Scholar
Kelley, W. M., Macrae, C. N., Wyland, C. L., Caglar, S., Inati, S., & Heatherton, T. F. (2002). Finding the self? An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(5), 785–794.Google Scholar
Kevins, A., & Soroka, S. N. (2018). Growing apart? Partisan sorting in Canada, 1992–2015. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 51(1), 103–133.Google Scholar
Klein, E. (2020). Why we’re polarized. Profile Books.Google Scholar
Knutson, K. M., Wood, J. N., Spampinato, M. V., & Grafman, J. (2006). Politics on the brain: An fMRI investigation. Social Neuroscience, 1(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, A., & Murphy, J. P. (2019, 11 September). Issue alignment and partisanship in the American public: Revisiting the ‘partisans without constraint’ thesis.Google Scholar
Krouwel, A., Kutiyski, Y., van Prooijen, J.-W., Martinsson, J., & Markstedt, E. (2017). Does extreme political ideology predict conspiracy beliefs, economic evaluations and political trust? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 435–462.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2017). The limits of partisan prejudice. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 485–501.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2010). Genetic evidence for multiple biological mechanisms underlying in-group favoritism. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1623–1628.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. J., Kandler, C., & Riemann, R. (2014). Distinct heritable influences underpin in-group love and out-group derogation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 407–413.Google Scholar
Lupu, N. (2015). Party polarization and mass partisanship: A comparative perspective. Political Behavior, 37(2), 331–356.Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, S. J. (2017). How negative partisanship affects voting behavior in Europe: Evidence from an analysis of 17 European multi-party systems with proportional voting. Research & Politics, 4(1).Google Scholar
McConnell, C., Margalit, Y., Malhotra, N., & Levendusky, M. (2018). The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191–229). Academic Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, J., & Houston, A. (1980). The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 85(4), 673–690.Google Scholar
Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 27–51.Google Scholar
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74.Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron, 50(4), 655–663.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. S., Skitka, L. J., & Wisneski, D. C. (2010). Moral and religious convictions and intentions to vote in the 2008 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 10(1), 307–320.Google Scholar
Morisi, D., Jost, J. T., & Singh, V. (2019). An asymmetrical ‘president-in-power’ effect. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 614–620.Google Scholar
Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T., Kaggen, L., Campbell-Meiklejohn, D., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2018). Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(2), 133–138.Google Scholar
Nefes, T. S. (2014). Rationale of conspiracy theorizing: Who shot the President Chen Shui-bian? Rationality and Society, 26(3), 373–394.Google Scholar
Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., & Tompson, T. (2015). What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-black attitudes. Electoral Studies, 40, 482–489.Google Scholar
Pereira, A., Harris, E., & Van Bavel, J. J. (in press). Identity concerns drive belief: The impact of partisan identity on the belief and dissemination of true and false news.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the American public. www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2017). The partisan divide on political values grows even wider. http://www.people-press.org/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political-values-grows-even-wider/Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2020). In changing U.S. electorate, race and education remain stark dividing lines. https://www.people-press.org/2020/06/02/in-changing-u-s-electorate-race-and-education-remain-stark-dividing-lines/Google Scholar
Ripberger, J. T., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Silva, C. L., et al. (2017). Bayesian versus politically motivated reasoning in human perception of climate anomalies. Environmental Research Letters, 12(11), Article 114004.Google Scholar
Robbett, A., & Matthews, P. H. (2018). Partisan bias and expressive voting. Journal of Public Economics, 157, 107–120.Google Scholar
Rollwage, M., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2018). Metacognitive failure as a feature of those holding radical beliefs. Current Biology, 28(24), 4014–4021.Google Scholar
Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 880–892.Google Scholar
Samuels, D., & Zucco, C. Jr. (2014). The power of partisanship in Brazil: Evidence from survey experiments. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 212–225.Google Scholar
Sarlin, B. (2018, 14 January). ‘Fake news’ went viral in 2016. This expert studied who clicked. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/fake-news-went-viral-2016-expert-studied-who-clicked-n836581Google Scholar
Schaffner, B. F., & Luks, S. (2018). Misinformation or expressive responding? What an inauguration crowd can tell us about the source of political misinformation in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 135–147.Google Scholar
Shafranek, R. M. (2021). Political considerations in nonpolitical decisions: A conjoint analysis of roommate choice. Political Behavior, 43, 271–300.Google Scholar
Shearer, E., & Gottfried, J. (2017). News use across social media platforms 2017. Pew Research Center. https://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017/Google Scholar
Sherif, M., White, B. J., & Harvey, O. J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60(4), 370–379.Google Scholar
Shook, N. J., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 995–998.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, N. (2020). Who do you believe? Political parties and conspiracy theories in Pakistan. Party Politics, 26(2), 107–119.Google Scholar
Silverman, C. (2016, 16 November). This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebookGoogle Scholar
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917.Google Scholar
Smallpage, S. M., Enders, A. M., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The partisan contours of conspiracy theory beliefs. Research & Politics, 4(4).Google Scholar
Stern, C., West, T. V., & Schmitt, P. G. (2014). The liberal illusion of uniqueness. Psychological Science, 25(1), 137–144.Google Scholar
Sternisko, A., Cichocka, A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). The dark side of social movements: Social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 1–6.Google Scholar
Strandberg, T., Olson, J. A., Hall, L., Woods, A., & Johansson, P. (2020). Depolarizing American voters: Democrats and Republicans are equally susceptible to false attitude feedback. PLoS ONE, 15(2), Article e0226799.Google Scholar
Strandberg, T., Sivén, D., Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Pärnamets, P. (2018). False beliefs and confabulation can lead to lasting changes in political attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(9), 1382–1399.Google Scholar
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.Google Scholar
Taber, C. S., Lodge, M., & Glathar, J. (2001). The motivated construction of political judgments. In Kuklinski, J. H. (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 198–226). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–103.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.Google Scholar
Tappin, M. B., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. R. (2020). Thinking clearly about casual inferences of politically motivated reasoning: Why paradigmatic study designs often undermine casual inference. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 81–87.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 227–238.Google Scholar
Toner, K., Leary, M. R., Asher, M. W., & Jongman-Sereno, K. P. (2013). Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2454–2462.Google Scholar
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., et al. (2018, March). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Hewlett Foundation. https://www.hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Social-Media-Political-Polarization-and-Political-Disinformation-Literature-Review.pdfGoogle Scholar
Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., Harris, E. A., Pärnamets, P., Rathje, S., Doell, K. C., & Tucker, J. A. (in press). Political psychology in the digital (mis)information age: A model of news belief and sharing. Social Issues and Policy Review.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2008). The neural substrates of in-group bias: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1131–1139.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213–224.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., Sternisko, A., Harris, E., & Robertson, C. (2020). The social function of rationalization: An identity perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. J. (2020). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 23–51.Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J. W., Krouwel, A. P., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570–578.Google Scholar
Verhulst, B., Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 34–51.Google Scholar
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.Google Scholar
Wilson, A., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223–228.Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. J., Coppin, G., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2016). Clarifying the role of perception in intergroup relations: Origins of bias, components of perception, and practical implications. Psychological Inquiry, 27(4), 358–366.Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2019). Sudden shifts in social identity swiftly shape implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 55–69.Google Scholar
Yudkin, D. A., Rothmund, T., Twardawski, M., Thalla, N., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2016). Reflexive intergroup bias in third-party punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(11), 1448–1459.Google Scholar
Zimerman, A., & Pinheiro, F. (2020). Appearances can be deceptive: Political polarization, agrarian policy, and coalitional presidentialism in Brazil. Politics & Policy, 48(2), 339–371.Google Scholar
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2020). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 407–418.Google Scholar

References

Abramowitz, A. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2Google Scholar
Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J. (2019). Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: Why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 49–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12310Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N. (2017). Personality traits, income, and economic ideology. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12349Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threat. Nature Human Behavior, 4(6), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0823-zGoogle Scholar
Baldassari, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010098Google Scholar
Bardeen, J. R., & Michel, J. S. (2019). Associations among dimensions of political ideology and Dark Tetrad personality features. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 7(1), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1071Google Scholar
Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V. (1997). Harmony and security value orientations in political evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234006Google Scholar
Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2020). Worldview conflict and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.002Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, W. (1960). The American voter. Wiley.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.xGoogle Scholar
Carmines, E. G., Ensley, M. J., & Wagner, M. W. (2012). Political ideology in American politics: One, two, or none? The Forum, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/1540-8884.1526Google Scholar
Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. The American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955648Google Scholar
Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.xGoogle Scholar
Chirumbolo, A., Areni, A., & Sensales, G. (2004). Need for cognitive closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes and attributional style. International Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000005Google Scholar
Cizmar, A. M., Layman, G. C., McTague, J., Pearson-Merkowitz, S., & Spivey, M. (2014). Authoritarianism and American political behavior from 1952 to 2008. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913492019Google Scholar
Clifford, S., Jewell, R., & Waggoner, P. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072Google Scholar
Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808Google Scholar
Collins, T. P., Crawford, J. T., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). No evidence for ideological asymmetry in dissonance avoidance. Social Psychology, 48(3), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000300Google Scholar
Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 1–74). Free Press.Google Scholar
Czarnek, G., & Kossowska, M. (2019, 6 July). Welfare state regime and political engagement modify the relationship between openness and economic beliefs. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q4uksGoogle Scholar
Dang, J., King, K. M., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., et al. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617746796Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Bizumic, B. (2013). Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34(6), 841–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12022Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.xGoogle Scholar
Duriez, B., Van Hiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00419.xGoogle Scholar
Eichmeier, A., & Stenhouse, N. (2019). Differences that don’t make much difference: Party asymmetry in open-minded cognitive styles has little relationship to information processing behavior. Research & Politics, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019872045Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. Praeger.Google Scholar
Federico, C. M. (2015). The structure, foundations, and expression of ideology. In Berinsky, A. (Ed.), New directions in public opinion (2nd ed., pp. 81–103). Routledge.Google Scholar
Federico, C. M. (2020). When do psychological differences predict political differences? Engagement and the psychological bases of political polarization. In van Prooijen, J.-W. (Ed.), Political polarization (pp. 17–37). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042433Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., Deason, G., & Fisher, E. L. (2012). Ideological asymmetry in the relationship between epistemic motivation and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029063Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., & Ekstrom, P. D. (2018). The political self: How identity aligns preferences with epistemic needs. Psychological Science, 29(6), 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617748679Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. V. (2014). Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(4), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213517273Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., Fisher, E. L., & Deason, G. (2011). Expertise and the ideological consequences of the authoritarian predisposition. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(4), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr026Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., & Goren, P. (2009). Motivated social cognition and ideology: Is attention to elite discourse a prerequisite for epistemically motivated political affinities? In Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., & Thorisdottir, H. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 267–291). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.001.0001Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., Hunt, C. V., & Ergun, D. (2009). Political expertise, social worldviews, and ideology: Translating ‘competitive jungles’ and ‘dangerous worlds’ into ideological reality. Social Justice Research, 22(2–3), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0097-0Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., Johnston, C. D., & Lavine, H. G. (2014). Context, engagement, and the (multiple) functions of negativity bias. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13002550Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., & Malka, A. (2018). The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Advances in Political Psychology, 39(S1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12477Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., & Reifen Tagar, M. (2014). Zeroing in on the right: Education and the partisan expression of authoritarianism. Political Behavior, 36, 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9250-4Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00316Google Scholar
Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055Google Scholar
Fleishman, J. A. (1988). Attitude organization in the general public: Evidence for a bidimensional structure. Social Forces, 67(1), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/67.1.159Google Scholar
Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. (2017). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (2010). The personality puzzle (5th ed.). W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2011). The Big Five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051010-111659Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000031Google Scholar
Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. (1953). Character and social structure. Harcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar
Goren, P. (2012). On voter competence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141Google Scholar
Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grossmann, M., & Hopkins, D. A. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological Republicans and group-interest Democrats. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Random House.Google Scholar
Harper, C. A. (2020, 19 March). Ideological measurement in social and personality psychological science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wpsjeGoogle Scholar
Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30(6), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669Google Scholar
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00230Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K. (1992). Ideological thinking among mass publics and political elites. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(4), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1086/269335Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Johnston, C. D., Lavine, H. G., & Federico, C. M. (2017). Open versus closed: Personality, identity, and the politics of redistribution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, C. D., & Wronski, J. (2015). Personality dispositions and political preferences across hard and easy issues. Political Psychology, 36(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12068Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2013). Political ideologies and their social psychological functions. In Freeden, M., Sargent, L. T., & Stears, M. (Eds.), Handbook of political ideologies (pp. 232–250). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Sterling, J., & Stern, C. (2017). Getting closure on conservatism, or the politics of epistemic and existential motivation. In Kopetz, C. & Fishbach, A. (Eds.), The motivation-cognition interface – From the lab to the real world: A Festschrift in honor of Arie W. Kruglanski (pp. 56–87). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Stern, C., Rule, N. O., & Sterling, J. (2017). The politics of fear: Is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? Social Cognition, 35(4), 324–353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.324Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M. (2015). What is the ‘science of science communication’? Journal of Science Communication, 14(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312080110Google Scholar
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020). Uses and abuses of ideology in political psychology. Political Psychology, 41(4), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12650Google Scholar
Kettle, K. L., & Salerno, A. (2017). Anger promotes economic conservatism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(10), 1440–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217718169Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 778–867). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R., & Kalmoe, N. P. (2017). Neither liberal nor conservative: Ideological innocence in the American public. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K. A., Luna, J. P., Rosas, G., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2010). Latin American party systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, K. (1999). Liberalism and conservatism. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes (Vol. 2, pp. 59–158). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Knoke, D. M. (1979). Stratification and the dimensions of American political orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 772–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110806Google Scholar
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006Google Scholar
Kossowska, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in western and eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24(3), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00338Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.55.2.196Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed-mindedness. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & DeGrada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group centrism. Psychological Review, 113(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘freezing’. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480Google Scholar
Lammers, J., Koch, A., Conway, P., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 8(6), 612–622. http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678456Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and personality. Norton.Google Scholar
Lavine, H., Burgess, D. M., Snyder, J., et al. (1999). Threat, authoritarianism, and voting: An investigation of personality and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003006Google Scholar
Lavine, H., Lodge, M., Polichak, J., & Taber, C. (2002). Explicating the black box through experimentation: Studies of authoritarianism and threat. Political Analysis, 10(4), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/10.4.343Google Scholar
Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party polarization and ‘conflict extension’ in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786–802. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088434Google Scholar
Lefkofridi, Z., Wagner, M., & Willmann, J. E. (2014). Left-authoritarians and policy representation in Western Europe: Electoral choice across ideological dimensions. West European Politics, 37(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.818354Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man. Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luttig, M. D. (2018). The ‘prejudiced personality’ and the origins of partisan strength, affective polarization, and partisan sorting. Advances in Political Psychology, 39(S1), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12484Google Scholar
Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Holzer, N. (2017). Rethinking the rigidity of the right model: Three suboptimal methodological practices and their implications. In Crawford, J. T. & Jussim, L. (Eds.) Frontiers of social psychology: Politics of social psychology (pp. 116–135). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Soto, C. J. (2019). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1045–1069. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000072Google Scholar
Malka, A., & Soto, C. J. (2015). Rigidity of the economic right? Menu-independent and menu-dependent influences of psychological dispositions on political attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414556340Google Scholar
Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036170Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mason, L., & Wronski, J. (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12485Google Scholar
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America. MIT Press.Google Scholar
McClosky, H. (1958). Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953011Google Scholar
McClosky, H., & Zaller, J. (1984). The American ethos. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mooney, C. (2012). The Republican brain: The science of why they deny science – and reality. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2013). ‘Not for all the tea in China!’: Political ideology and the avoidance of dissonance-arousing situations. PLoS ONE, 8(4), Article e59837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059837Google Scholar
Newcomb, T. M. (1943). Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community. Dryden.Google Scholar
Noel, H. (2013). Political ideologies and political parties in America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Does personality matter? Openness correlates with vote choice, but particularly for politically sophisticated voters. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.09.001Google Scholar
Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2015). Within the limits of civic training: Education moderates the relationship between openness and political attitudes. Political Psychology, 36(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12070Google Scholar
Osmundsen, M., Hendry, D. J., Laustsen, S., Smith, K. N., & Petersen, M. B. (in press). The psychophysiology of political ideology: Replications, reanalysis, and recommendations. Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1086/714780Google Scholar
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B. (2015). Evolutionary political psychology: On the origin and structure of heuristics and biases in politics. Political Psychology, 36(S1), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12237Google Scholar
Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011). Basic personal values and the meaning of left‐right political orientations in 20 countries. Political Psychology, 32(4), 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.xGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, C. G., Moskowitz, J. P., Salem, R. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2017). Partisan selective exposure: The role of party, ideology and ideological extremity over time. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000121Google Scholar
Roets, A., Cornelis, I., & Van Hiel, A. (2014). Openness as a predictor of political orientation and conventional and unconventional political activism in Western and Eastern Europe. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.809354Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In Jowell, R., Roberts, C., Fitzgerald, R., & Eva, G. (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 161–193). Sage.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., et al. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36, 899–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9255-zGoogle Scholar
Sears, D. O., & Levy, S. R. (2003). Childhood and adult political development. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., & Jervis, R. L. (Eds.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 60–109). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shafer, B. E., & Claggett, W. J. (1995). The two majorities: The issue context of modern American politics. The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., & Warren, C. (2020). Physiology predicts ideology. Or does it? The current state of political psychophysiology research. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.001Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., & Bullock, J. (2004). A consistency theory of public opinion and political choice: The hypothesis of menu dependence. In Saris, W. E. & Sniderman, P. M. (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 337–357). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stangor, C., & Leary, S. P. (2006). Intergroup beliefs: Investigations from the social side. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38005-7Google Scholar
Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.365Google Scholar
Thorisdottir, H., Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from eastern and western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm008Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. (1963). Left and right: A basic dimension of ideology and personality. In White, R. W. (Ed.), The study of lives: Essays on personality in honor of Henry A. Murray (pp. 388–411). Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Treier, S., & Hillygus, D. S. (2009). The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp067Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004Google Scholar
Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., Crowson, H. M., & Roets, A. (2016). The relationship between right-wing attitudes and cognitive style: A comparison of self-report and behavioural measures of rigidity and intolerance of ambiguity. European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2082Google Scholar
Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., & De Pauw, S. (2010). The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1765–1799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00669.xGoogle Scholar
Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M., & Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264333Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J. W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2017). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 8(3), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616671403Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J. W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2019). Psychological features of extreme political ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418817755Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J. W., Krouwel, A. P. M., Boiten, M., & Eendebak, L. (2015). Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215569706Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J. W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Emmer, J. (2018). Ideological responses to the EU refugee crisis: The left, the right, and the extremes. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 9(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731501Google Scholar
Washburn, A. N., & Skitka, L. J. (2017). Science denial across the political divide: Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to deny attitude-inconsistent science. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 9(8), 927–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731500Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1948). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049Google Scholar
Wilson, G. D. (1973). The psychology of conservatism. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, O., & Saribay, S. A. (2016). An attempt to clarify the link between cognitive style and political ideology: A non-Western replication and extension. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000661Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2020). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 407–418.Google Scholar

References

Aarøe, L. (2012). When citizens go against elite directions: Partisan cues and contrast effects on citizens’ attitudes. Party Politics, 18(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810380093Google Scholar
Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2017). The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions: Why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000770Google Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579Google Scholar
Algan, Y., Dalvit, N., Do, Q.-A., Le Chapelain, A., & Zenou, Y. (2015). How social networks shape our beliefs: A natural experiment among future French politicians [Mimeo]. Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080210Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2017). Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes Democratic accountability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108227643Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N. (2017). Personality traits, income, and economic ideology. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12349Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2018). Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way we think about personality and politics. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1086/698928Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2020). Understanding partisan cue receptivity: Tests of predictions from the bounded rationality and expressive utility perspectives. The Journal of Politics, 82(3), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1086/707616Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2021). Rethinking the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. American Political Science Review. https://psyarxiv.com/a3jf5/Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0823-zGoogle Scholar
Barber, M., & Pope, J. C. (2019). Does party trump ideology? Disentangling party and ideology in America. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000795Google Scholar
Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.005Google Scholar
Boutyline, A., & Vaisey, S. (2017). Belief network analysis: A relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1371–1447. https://doi.org/10.1086/691274Google Scholar
Brandt, M. J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2019). What is central to political belief system networks? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(9), 1352–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218824354Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G. (2021). Education and attitudes toward redistribution in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 1230–1250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000504Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Caughey, D., O’Grady, T. O. M., & Warshaw, C. (2019). Policy ideology in European mass publics, 1981–2016. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 674–693. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000157Google Scholar
Chambers, C. (2019). The seven deadly sins of psychology: A manifesto for reforming the culture of scientific practice. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc779w5Google Scholar
Connors, E. C. (2020). The social dimension of political values. Political Behavior, 42(3), 961–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09530-3Google Scholar
Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110756Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass politics. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650Google Scholar
Coppock, A. (2019). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on Mechanical Turk: A replication approach. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(3), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.10Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2010). Ideology, partisanship, and democratic development. In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G., & Norris, P. (Eds.), Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in the 21st century (pp. 143–163). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288740.n7Google Scholar
Dawes, C. T., & Weinschenk, A. C. (2020). On the genetic basis of political orientation. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.012Google Scholar
DellaPosta, D. (2020). Pluralistic collapse: The ‘oil spill’ model of mass opinion polarization. American Sociological Review, 85(3), 507–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420922989Google Scholar
Dinas, E. (2013). Why does the apple fall far from the tree? How early political socialization prompts parent-child dissimilarity. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 827–852. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000033Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper. https://doi.org/10.2307/444355Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.xGoogle Scholar
Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1974). Genetics and the development of social attitudes. Nature, 249(5454), 288–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/249288a0Google Scholar
Enke, B. (2019). Kinship, cooperation, and the evolution of moral systems. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 953–1019. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz001Google Scholar
Erikson, R. S., & Stoker, L. (2011). Caught in the draft: The effects of Vietnam draft lottery status on political attitudes. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000141Google Scholar
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Hodson, G. (2002). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States and Canada in response to the September 11, 2001 ‘Attack on America’. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2002.00028.xGoogle Scholar
Fasching, N., Arceneaux, K., Bakker, B. N. (2021). Childhood personality is not systematically associated with ideology in adulthood [Working Paper].Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., & Malka, A. (2018). The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12477Google Scholar
Feldman, S., Huddy, L., Wronski, J., & Lown, P. (2020). The interplay of empathy and individualism in support for social welfare policies. Political Psychology, 41(2), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12620Google Scholar
Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055Google Scholar
Fournier, P., Soroka, S., & Nir, L. (2021). Negativity biases and political ideology: A comparative test across 17 countries. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000131Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Griffin, B. N., Belsky, J., & Roisman, G. I. (2012). Developmental antecedents of political ideology: A longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1425–1431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000131Google Scholar
Freeze, M., & Montgomery, J. M. (2015). Static stability and evolving constraint: Preference stability and ideological structure in the mass public. American Politics Research, 44(3), 415–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15607299Google Scholar
Garrido, N. R. (2020). Can education reduce traditional gender role attitudes? Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, SA (Ivie).Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957–994. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299705000412Google Scholar
Goren, P. (2020). Values and public opinion. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics (pp. 1–29). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.954Google Scholar
Goren, P., Federico, C. M., & Kittilson, M. C. (2009). Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00402.xGoogle Scholar
Goren, P., Schoen, H., Reifler, J., Scotto, T., & Chittick, W. (2016). A unified theory of value-based reasoning and U.S. public opinion. Political Behavior, 38(4), 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–016-9344-xGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Crabtree, C., & Smith, K. B. (2019). Ideology justifies morality: Political beliefs predict moral foundations. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12448Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Klemmensen, R., et al. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations. Behavior Genetics, 44(3), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-014-9648-8Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., & Verhulst, B. (2015). Political attitudes develop independently of personality traits. PLoS ONE, 10(3), Article e0134072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118106Google Scholar
Healy, A., & Malhotra, N. (2013). Childhood socialization and political attitudes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000996Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. S. (2011). The evolution of election polling in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 962–981. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr054Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1968). The transmission of political values from parent to child. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400115709Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090719Google Scholar
Johnston, C. D., Lavine, H. G., & Federico, C. M. (2017). Open versus closed: Personality, identity, and the politics of redistribution. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316341452Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339Google Scholar
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020). Uses and abuses of ideology in political psychology. Political Psychology, 41(4), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12650Google Scholar
Kandler, C., Bell, E., Shikishima, C., Yamagata, S., & Riemann, R. (2015). Genetic foundations of attitude formation. In Scott, R. A., Kosslyn, S. M., & Buchmann, M. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–21). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., & Rehm, P. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12), 1670–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013516066Google Scholar
Knight, K. (2006). Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062502Google Scholar
Kozlowski, A., & Murphy, J. P. (2021). Issue alignment and partisanship in the American public: Revisiting the ‘partisans without constraint’ thesis. Social Science Research, 94, Article 102498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020Google Scholar
Lavine, H., Sullivan, J. L., Borgida, E., & Thomsen, C. J. (1996). The relationship of national and personal issue salience to attitude accessibility on foreign and domestic policy issues. Political Psychology, 17(2), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791812Google Scholar
Lelkes, Y. (2020). Ancestral kinship and the origins of ideology [Working Paper].Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. S. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–009-9094-0Google Scholar
Linzer, D. A. (2008). The structure of mass ideology and its consequences for democratic governance. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 170. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304655873?accountid=35812Google Scholar
Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23(2–3), 156–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3Google Scholar
Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Soto, C. J. (2019). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1045–1069. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000072Google Scholar
Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036170Google Scholar
Martin, G. J., & Yurukoglu, A. (2017). Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2565–2599. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160812Google Scholar
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2016). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/Sl537592707071873Google Scholar
McClosky, H. (1958). Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953011Google Scholar
McClosky, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review, 58(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952868Google Scholar
Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2020). Does openness to experience predict changes in conservatism? A nine-wave longitudinal investigation into the personality roots to ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, Article 103979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103979Google Scholar
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627Google Scholar
Pan, J., & Xu, Y. (2018). China’s ideological spectrum. Journal of Politics, 80(1), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1086/694255Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.xGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., et al. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36(4), 899–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–013-9255-zGoogle Scholar
Shafer, E. F., & Malhotra, N. (2011). The effect of a child’s sex on support for traditional gender roles. Social Forces, 90(1), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/90.1.209Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Ho, A. K., Sibley, C., & Duriez, B. (2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.1200Google Scholar
Slothuus, R. (2010). When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural experiment. Political Communication, 27(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584601003709381Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Hatemi, P. K. (2017). Intuitive ethics and political orientations: Testing moral foundations as a theory of political ideology. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12255Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS ONE, 6(10), Article e25552. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025552Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with trade-offs: Psychological constraints and political implications. In Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., & Popkin, S. L. (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 239–263). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805813.011Google Scholar
Van den Akker, O., Weston, S. J., Campbell, L., et al. (2019). Preregistration of secondary data analysis: A template and tutorial.Google Scholar
Van der Brug, W., & Van Spanje, J. (2009). Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension. European Journal of Political Research, 48(3), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00841.xGoogle Scholar
Verhulst, B., Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00568.xGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, M. P. (2019). The changing nature of mass belief systems: The rise of concept and policy ideologues. Critical Review, 31(2), 198–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2019.1690223Google Scholar
Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579–616. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111583Google Scholar

References

Abeles, A. T., Howe, L. C., Krosnick, J. A., & MacInnis, B. (2019). Perception of public opinion on global warming and the role of opinion deviance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.001Google Scholar
Albertson, B. L. (2011). Religious appeals and implicit attitudes. Political Psychology, 32(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00793.xGoogle Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579Google Scholar
Anand, S., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). The impact of attitudes toward foreign policy goals on public preferences among presidential candidates: A study of issue publics and the attentive public in the 2000 U.S. presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33(1), 31–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0360491802250541Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In Swanson, G. E., Newcomb, T. M., & Hartley, E. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 2–11). Holt. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520313514-017Google Scholar
Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. SAGE.Google Scholar
Bélanger, É., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001Google Scholar
Bell, E., Schermer, J. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2009). The origins of political attitudes and behaviours: An analysis using twins. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423909990060Google Scholar
Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R. W., & Tuchfarber, A. J. (1980). Experiments in filtering political opinions. Political Behavior, 2(4), 339–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990173Google Scholar
Bishop, G. F., Tuchfarber, A. J., & Oldendick, R. W. (1986). Opinions on fictitious issues: The pressure to answer survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1086/268978Google Scholar
Brandt, M. J., & Wetherell, G. A. (2012). What attitudes are moral attitudes? The case of attitude heritability. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611412793Google Scholar
Brody, R. A., & Page, B. I. (1972). Comment: The assessment of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 66(2), 450–458.Google Scholar
Burden, B. C., & Rice Sanberg, J. N. (2003). Budget rhetoric in presidential campaigns from 1952 to 2000. Political Behavior, 25(2), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023825212333Google Scholar
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97Google Scholar
Campbell, J. E. (1983). Ambiguity in the issue positions of presidential candidates: A causal analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 27(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111018Google Scholar
Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 641–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp075Google Scholar
Claassen, R. L. (2007). Ideology and evaluation in an experimental setting: Comparing the proximity and the directional models. Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907302050Google Scholar
Claassen, R. L. (2009). Direction versus proximity: Amassing experimental evidence. American Politics Research, 37(2), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X08321756Google Scholar
Conover, P. J. (1988). Feminists and the gender gap. The Journal of Politics, 50(4), 985–1010. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131388Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). The Free Press of Glencoe. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650Google Scholar
Crespi, L. P. (1948). The interview effect in polling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1086/265924Google Scholar
Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., Hansen, K. M., & Larsen, M. V. (2017). How election polls shape voting behaviour. Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12094Google Scholar
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ehret, P. J., Van Boven, L., & Sherman, D. K. (2018). Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: Understanding climate policy polarization. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(3), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618758709Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111130Google Scholar
Flores, A. R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., Miller, P. R., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2018). Challenged expectations: Mere exposure effects on attitudes about transgender people and rights. Political Psychology, 39(1), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12402Google Scholar
Fournier, P., Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Issue importance and performance voting. Political Behavior, 25(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022952311518Google Scholar
Frankovic, K., Johnson, T., & Stavrakantonaki, M. (2017). Freedom to conduct opinion polls: A 2017 worldwide update. https://www.esomar.org/uploads/public/library/news/ESOMAR-WAPOR_Freedom-to-Conduct-Opinion-Polls.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G., & Rae, S. F. (1940). Is there a bandwagon vote? Public Opinion Quarterly, 4(2), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1086/265397Google Scholar
Gelpi, C., Feaver, P. D., & Reifler, J. (2006). Success matters: Casualty sensitivity and the war in Iraq. International Security, 30(3), 7–46. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228805775969573Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808009XGoogle Scholar
Gilens, M. (1996). ‘Race coding’ and White opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082611Google Scholar
Grillo, A. (2017). Risk aversion and bandwagon effect in the pivotal voter model. Public Choice, 172(3), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0457-5Google Scholar
Hansen, J. M. (1985). The political economy of group membership. American Political Science Review, 79, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956120Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Gillespie, N. A., Eaves, L. J., et al. (2011). A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610001015Google Scholar
Herbst, S. (1993). The meaning of public opinion: Citizens’ constructions of political reality. Media, Culture & Society, 15(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344393015003007Google Scholar
Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the Democratic process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hildum, D. C., & Brown, R. W. (1956). Verbal reinforcement and interviewer bias. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(1), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040518Google Scholar
Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., Gardner, W. L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 930–950. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669333Google Scholar
Howe, L. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2017). Attitude strength. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033600Google Scholar
Insko, C. A. (1965). Verbal reinforcement of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(4), 621–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022485Google Scholar
Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172Google Scholar
Jones, P. E., Brewer, P. R., Young, D. G., Lambe, J. L., & Hoffman, L. H. (2018). Explaining public opinion toward transgender people, rights, and candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy009Google Scholar
Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., & Riemann, R. (2012). Left or right? Sources of political orientation: The roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025560Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190156Google Scholar
Kim, Y. M. (2009). Issue publics in the new information environment: Selectivity, domain specificity, and extremity. Communication Research, 36(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330253Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. T., & Lindsey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.; pp. 778–867). McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.196Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A. (1990). Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America. Political Behavior, 12(1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992332Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., et al. (2002). The impact of ‘no opinion’ response options on data quality: Non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1086/341394Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., & Milburn, M. A. (1990). Psychological determinants of political opinionation. Social Cognition, 8(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.49Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., Narayan, S., & Smith, W. R. (1996). Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidence. New Directions for Evaluation, 70, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1033Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In Krosnick, J. A. & Petty, R. E. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480Google Scholar
Kuru, O., Pasek, J., & Traugott, M. W. (2017). Motivated reasoning in the perceived credibility of public opinion polls. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(2), 422–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx018Google Scholar
Lacy, D., & Paolino, P. (2010). Testing proximity versus directional voting using experiments. Electoral Studies, 29(3), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.008Google Scholar
Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990050Google Scholar
Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Morwinski, S. (2012). Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1743Google Scholar
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace and Company. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127736Google Scholar
Madonna, G. T., & Young, M. (2002). The first political poll. https://www.fandm.edu/uploads/files/271296109834777015-the-first-political-poll-6-18-2002.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mildenberger, M., & Tingley, D. (2019). Beliefs about climate beliefs: The importance of second-order opinions for climate politics. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1279–1307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000321Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2004). Threat as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology, 25(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00384.xGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. M., Krosnick, J. A., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2016). The origins of policy issue salience: Personal and national importance impact on behavioral, cognitive, and emotional issue engagement. In Krosnick, J. A., Chang, I.-C. A., & Stark, T. A. (Eds.), Political psychology: New explorations (pp. 125–171). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445687Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A., Tahk, A., & Dionne, L. (2016). The impact of policy change threat on financial contributions to interest groups. In Krosnick, J. A., Chang, I.-C. A., & Stark, T. A. (Eds.), Political psychology: New explorations (pp. 172–202). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445687Google Scholar
Miller, R. L. (1976). Mere exposure, psychological reactance and attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(2), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1086/268290Google Scholar
Morton, R. B., Muller, D., Page, L., & Torgler, B. (2015). Exit polls, turnout, and bandwagon voting: Evidence from a natural experiment. European Economic Review, 77, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.03.012Google Scholar
Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, presidents, and public opinion. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. (1992). Impersonal influence: Effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes. Political Behavior, 14(2), 89–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992237Google Scholar
O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B. R., & Smith, N. A. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. ICWSM 2010 – Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1536/1842Google Scholar
Oskarsson, S., Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., et al. (2015). Linking genes and political orientations: Testing the cognitive ability as mediator hypothesis. Political Psychology, 36(6), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12230Google Scholar
Page, B., & Shapiro, R. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956018Google Scholar
Peterson, B. E., Doty, R. M., & Winter, D. G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293192006Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741Google Scholar
Ripberger, J. T. (2011). Capturing curiosity: Using internet search trends to measure public attentiveness. Policy Studies Journal, 39(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00406.xGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rothschild, D., & Malhotra, N. (2014). Are public opinion polls self-fulfilling prophecies? Research and Politics, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168014547667Google Scholar
Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording and context. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., Mitchell, M., Haley, H., & Navarrete, C. D. (2006). Support for harsh criminal sanctions and criminal justice beliefs: A social dominance perspective. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0026-4Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1954). Bandwagon and underdog effects and the possibility of election predictions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1086/266513Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.2307/411334Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., Hagen, M. G., Tetlock, P. E., & Brady, H. E. (1986). Reasoning chains: Causal models of policy reasoning in mass publics. British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400004506Google Scholar
Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. K. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042782Google Scholar
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.xGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819Google Scholar
Tomz, M., & Van Houweling, R. P. (2008). Candidate positioning and voter choice. American Political Science Review, 102(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080301Google Scholar
Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Simmons, J. P. (2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00522-XGoogle Scholar
Waterton, J., & Lievesley, D. (1987). Attrition in a panel study of attitudes. Journal of Official Statistics, 3(3), 267–282.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154Google Scholar

References

Achen, C., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 246–278.Google Scholar
Althaus, S. L. (1998). Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review, 92(3), 545–558.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K. (2008). Can partisan cues diminish democratic accountability? Political Behavior, 30(2), 139–160.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R J. (2013). The effects of need for cognition and need for affect on partisan evaluations. Political Psychology, 34(1), 23–42.Google Scholar
Barker, D. C. (2005). Values, frames, and persuasion in presidential nomination campaigns. Political Behavior, 27(4), 375–394.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 194–230.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.Google Scholar
Bechtel, M. M., Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Helbling, M. (2015). Reality bites: The limits of framing effects for salient and contested policy issues. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(3), 683–695.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bisgaard, M. (2015). Bias will find a way: Economic-perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. Journal of Politics, 77(3), 849–860.Google Scholar
Bisgaard, M., & Slothuus, R. (2018). Partisan elites as culprits? How party cues shape partisan perceptual gaps. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 456–469.Google Scholar
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262.Google Scholar
Boudreau, C., & MacKenzie, S. A. (2014). Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 48–62.Google Scholar
Brady, H. E., & Sniderman, P. M. (1985). Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review, 79(4), 1061–1078.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G. (2011). Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 496–515.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460–473.Google Scholar
Chong, D. (1993). How people think, reason, and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 867–899.Google Scholar
Chong, D. (2000). Rational lives: Norms and values in politics and society. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655.Google Scholar
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126.Google Scholar
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2010). Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 663–680.Google Scholar
Chong, D., & Mullinix, K. J. (2019). Information and issue constraints on the influence of partisan cues. American Politics Research, 47(6), 1209–1238.Google Scholar
Chong, D., & Wolinsky-Nahmias, Y. (2005). Managing voter ambivalence in growth and conservation campaigns. In Martinez, S. C. & Martinez, M. D. (Eds.), Ambivalence, politics, and public policy (pp. 103–125). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ciuk, D. J., & Yost, B. A. (2016). The effects of issue salience, elite influence, and policy content on public opinion. Political Communication, 33(2), 328–345.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822.Google Scholar
Conlisk, J. (1996). Why bounded rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 669–700.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). Free Press.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2001a). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2001b). Using credible advice to overcome framing effects. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 17(1), 62–82.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2001c). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671–686.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2012). The politics of motivation. Critical Review, 24(2), 199–216.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). Is public opinion stable? Resolving the micro/macro disconnect in studies of public opinion. Daedalus, 141(4), 50–68.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Enns, P. K., & McAvoy, G. E. (2012). The role of partisanship in aggregate opinion. Political Behavior, 34(4), 627–651.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974.Google Scholar
Gerber, E. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2003). Development ballot measures, interest group endorsements, and the political geography of growth preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 625–639.Google Scholar
Gershkoff, A., & Kushner, S. (2005). Shaping public opinion: The 9/11-Iraq connection in the Bush administration’s rhetoric. Perspectives on Politics, 3(3), 525–537.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychology Review, 103(4), 650–669.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(2), 379–396.Google Scholar
Glazier, R. A., & Boydstun, A. E. (2012). The president, the press, and the war: A tale of two framing agendas. Political Communication, 29(4), 428–446.Google Scholar
Goren, P. (2002). Character weakness, partisan bias, and presidential evaluation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 627–641.Google Scholar
Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, K., & D’Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Guess, A., & Coppock, A. (2020). Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1497–1515.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2001). Gun opinion, tragedy, and blame attribution: The conditional influence of issue framing. Journal of Politics, 63(2), 520–543.Google Scholar
Hanggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2010). Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign. Political Communication, 27(2), 141–157.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2009). How do you know? The economics of ordinary knowledge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hartman, T. K., & Weber, C. R. (2009). Who said what? The effects of source cues in issue frames. Political Behavior, 31(4), 537–558.Google Scholar
Healy, A., & Lenz, G S. (2014). Substituting the end for the whole: Why voters respond primarily to the election-year economy. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 31–47.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1982). Shifting involvements: Private interest and public action. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hogarth, R. M., & Reder, M. W. (1987). Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1449–1475.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.Google Scholar
Kam, C. D. (2005). Who toes the party line? Political Behavior, 27(2), 163–182.Google Scholar
Kernell, G., & Mullinix, K. J. (2019). Winners, losers, and perceptions of vote (mis)counting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Khanna, K., & Sood, G. (2018). Motivated responding in studies of factual learning. Political Behavior, 40(1), 79–101.Google Scholar
Kim, S.-Y., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2010). A computational model of the citizen as motivated reasoner: Modeling the dynamics of the 2000 presidential election. Political Behavior, 32(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Klar, S. (2014). Partisanship in a social setting. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 687–704.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. In Lupia, A., McCubbins, M., & Popkin, S. (Eds.), Elements of political reason (pp. 153–182). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in an election campaign. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lavine, H., Johnston, C., & Steenbergen, M. (2012). The ambivalent partisan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lebo, M. J., & Cassino, D. (2007). The aggregated consequences of motivated reasoning and the dynamics of partisan presidential approval. Political Psychology, 28(6), 719–746.Google Scholar
Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Advances in Political Psychology 35(Suppl. 1), 129–156.Google Scholar
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: an experimental test. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482.Google Scholar
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63–76.Google Scholar
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The Democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malhotra, N., & Kuo, A. G. (2008). Attributing blame: The public’s response to Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 120–135.Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderator roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844.Google Scholar
Mullinix, K. J. (2016). Partisanship and preference formation: Elite polarization, issue importance, and competing motivations. Political Behavior, 38(2), 383–411.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040–1067.Google Scholar
Nicholson, S. P., & Howard, R. M. (2003). Framing support for the Supreme Court in the aftermath of Bush v Gore. Journal of Politics, 65(3), 676–695.Google Scholar
Nir, L. (2011). Motivated reasoning and public opinion perception. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 504–532.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, D. J. (2016). Persuasion: Theory and research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Parker-Stephen, E. (2013). Tides of disagreement: How reality facilitates (and inhibits) partisan public opinion. Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1077–1088.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S., & Ramsoy, T. (2013). Motivated reasoning and political parties: Evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues. Political Behavior, 35(4), 831–854.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2012). The elaboration likelihood model. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 224–245). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123–205). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127.Google Scholar
Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious: The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 489–518.Google Scholar
Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 472–496.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P. (2004). What voters do: Information search during election campaigns. Political Psychology, 25(4), 595–610.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever ‘get it’? Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–593.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 25–43.Google Scholar
Riggle, E. D., Ottati, V. C., Wyer, R. S., Kuklinski, J., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Bases of political judgments: The role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information. Political Behavior, 14(1), 67–87.Google Scholar
Robison, J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2016). Elite polarization and public opinion. Political Communication, 33(2), 261–282.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, A. (1998). Modeling bounded rationality. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sides, J. (2006). The origins of campaign agendas. British Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 407–436.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. Wiley.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1995). Rationality in political behavior. Political Psychology, 16(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
Slothuus, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630–645.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In Morris, A. D. & Mueller, C. M. (Eds.), Studies in public opinion (pp. 456–472). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Taber, C. S., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137–155.Google Scholar
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. R. (1979). A rational choice perspective on congressional norms. American Journal of Political Science, 23(2), 245–262.Google Scholar
Wise, D., & Brewer, P. R. (2010). Competing frames for a public health issue and their effects on public opinion. Mass Communication and Society, 13(4), 435–457.Google Scholar
Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior, 41(1), 135–163.Google Scholar

References

Adams, T. G., Stewart, P. A., & Blanchar, J. C. (2014). Disgust and the politics of sex: Exposure to a disgusting odorant increases politically conservative views on sex and decreases support for gay marriage. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e95572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095572Google Scholar
Åhäll, L., & Gregory, T. (Eds.). (2015). Emotions, politics and war. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ahn, W.-Y., Kishida, K. T., Gu, X., et al. (2014). Nonpolitical images evoke neural predictors of political ideology. Current Biology, 24(22), 2693–2699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.050Google Scholar
Averill, J. R. (1980). On the paucity of positive emotions. In Blankstein, K., Pliner, P., & Polivy, J. (Eds.), Advances in the study of communication and affect: Vol. 6. Assessment and modification of emotional behavior (pp. 7–45). Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50018-1Google Scholar
Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1145–1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1145Google Scholar
Baele, S. J. (2017). Lone‐actor terrorists’ emotions and cognition: An evaluation beyond stereotypes. Political Psychology, 38(3), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12365Google Scholar
Banks, A. J. (2014). Anger and racial politics: The emotional foundation of racial attitudes in America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banks, A. J., & Hicks, H. M. (2016). Fear and implicit racism: Whites’ support for voter ID laws. Political Psychology, 37(5), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12292Google Scholar
Bar‐Tal, D., Halperin, E., & De Rivera, J. (2007). Collective emotions in conflict situations: Societal implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63(2), 441–460.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., Gross, J., Christensen, T. C., & Benvenuto, M. (2001). Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000239Google Scholar
Basta, K. (2020). ‘Time’s up!’: Framing collective impatience for radical political change. Political Psychology, 41(4), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12649Google Scholar
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2014). Disgust, harm, and morality in politics. Political Psychology, 35(4), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12053Google Scholar
Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240104Google Scholar
Boukala, S., & Dimitrakopoulou, D. (2017). The politics of fear vs. the politics of hope: Analysing the 2015 Greek election and referendum campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1182933Google Scholar
Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226788302Google Scholar
Brader, T., & Marcus, G. E. (2013). Emotion and political psychology. In Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology, (2nd ed.; pp. 165–204). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brader, T., Marcus, G. E., & Miller, K. L. (2011). Emotion and public opinion. In Edwards, G. C. III, Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of American public opinion and the media (pp. 384–401). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199545636.003.0024Google Scholar
Breeze, R. (2019). Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and Labour. Discourse & Society, 30(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518801074Google Scholar
Burke, B. L., Kosloff, S., & Landau, M. J. (2013). Death goes to the polls: A meta‐analysis of mortality salience effects on political attitudes. Political Psychology, 34, 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12005Google Scholar
Cabral, J. C. C., & de Almeida, R. M. M. (2019). Effects of anger on dominance seeking and aggressive behaviors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehGoogle Scholar
Capelos, T. (2013). Understanding anxiety and aversion: The origins and consequences of affectivity in political campaigns. In Demertzis, N. (Ed.), Emotions in politics (pp. 39–59). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025661_3Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, L. A., MacInnis, D. J., & Weiss, A. M. (2016). Perceptual dimensions differentiate emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 30(8), 1430–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1070119Google Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cheung‐Blunden, V., & Ju, J. (2016). Anxiety as a barrier to information processing in the event of a cyberattack. Political Psychology, 37(3), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12264Google Scholar
Clifford, S. (2019). How emotional frames moralize and polarize political attitudes. Political Psychology, 40(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12507Google Scholar
Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2018). Disgust, anxiety, and political learning in the face of threat. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12350Google Scholar
Clifford, S., & Wendell, D. G. (2016). How disgust influences health purity attitudes. Political Behavior, 38(1), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015Google Scholar
Cohen-Chen, S., Crisp, R. J., & Halperin, E. (2017). A new appraisal-based framework underlying hope in conflict resolution. Emotion Review, 9(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916670023Google Scholar
Collins, J., & Block, R. Jr. (2020). Fired up, ready to go: The impact of age, campaign enthusiasm, and civic duty on African American voting. Political Behavior, 42, 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9488-yGoogle Scholar
Cottam, M. L., Mastors, E., Preston, T., & Dietz, B. (2015). Introduction to political psychology (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671932Google Scholar
Curato, N. (2016). Politics of anxiety, politics of hope: Penal populism and Duterte’s rise to power. Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35, 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341603500305Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1998). Are different parts of the extended amygdala involved in fear versus anxiety? Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1239−1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00288-1Google Scholar
Demertzis, N. (Ed.). (2017). Emotions in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30, 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9056-yGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3(4), 364-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410740Google Scholar
Elfenbein, H. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(4), 326–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614542889Google Scholar
Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasant emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 2(4), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938808412702Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (1972). The nature of anxiety with emphasis upon its relationship to expectancy. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 291−337). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336−353. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696Google Scholar
Finn, C., & Glaser, J. (2010). Voter affect and the 2008 US presidential election: Hope and race mattered. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10(1), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01206.xGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A. H., & Roseman, I. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Cohn, M. A. (2008). Positive emotions. In Lewis, M, Haviland-Jones, J. M, & Barrett, L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (Vol. 3, pp. 777–796). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Frija, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frimer, J. A., & Skitka, L. J. (2018). The Montagu Principle: Incivility decreases politicians’ public approval, even with their political base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(5), 845–866. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000140Google Scholar
Gervais, B. T. (2017). More than mimicry? The role of anger in uncivil reactions to elite political incivility. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw010Google Scholar
Gervais, B. T. (2019). Rousing the partisan combatant: Elite incivility, anger, and antideliberative attitudes. Political Psychology, 40(3), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12532Google Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012). Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Stoeger, H., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9152-2Google Scholar
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (Eds.). (2001). Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gould, D. B. (2004). Passionate political processes: Bringing emotions back into social movements. In Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.), Rethinking social movements: Structure, meaning, and emotion (pp. 155–175). Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018067108Google Scholar
Grimmer, J., & King, G. (2011). General purpose computer-assisted clustering and conceptualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2643–2650.Google Scholar
Habib, M., Cassotti, M., Moutier, S., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Fear and anger have opposite effects on risk seeking in the gain frame. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00253Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In Davidon, R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Goldsmith, H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, E., Canetti, D., & Kimhi, S. (2012). In love with hatred: Rethinking the role hatred plays in shaping political behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2231–2256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00938.xGoogle Scholar
Halperin, E., & Schori-Eyal, N. (2019). Moral emotions in political decision making. In Redlawsk, D. P. (Ed.), Oxford encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.922Google Scholar
Hasell, A., & Weeks, B. E. (2016). Partisan provocation: The role of partisan news use and emotional responses in political information sharing in social media. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12092Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., McDermott, R., Eaves, L. J., Kendler, K. S., & Neale, M. C. (2013). Fear as a disposition and an emotional state: A genetic and environmental approach to out‐group political preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12016Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press.Google Scholar
Hoewe, J., & Parrott, M. S. (2019). The power of anger: How emotions predict information seeking and sharing after a presidential election. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 27, 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1614925Google Scholar
Houghton, D. P. (2014). Political psychology: Situations, individuals, and cases (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hu, X., Zhuang, C., Wang, F., Liu, Y.-J., Im, C.-H., & Zhang, D. (2019). fNIRS evidence for recognizably different positive emotions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, Article 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00120Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Weber, C. (2007). The political consequences of perceived threat and felt insecurity. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 614(1), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207305951Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604Google Scholar
Huebner, B. (2011). Genuinely collective emotions. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-010-0006-2Google Scholar
Hunter, L. E., Meer, E. A., Gillan, C. M., Hsu, M., & Daw, N. D. (2019). Excessive deliberation in social anxiety. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/522433Google Scholar
Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022408Google Scholar
Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R. (2014). Theorizing emotions in world politics. International Theory, 6(3), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000232Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802110007Google Scholar
Jenkins, L. (2018). Why do all our feelings about politics matter? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117746917Google Scholar
Jepson, C., & Chaiken, S. (1990). Chronic issue-specific fear inhibits systematic processing of persuasive communications. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 61–84.Google Scholar
Johnston, G., Roseman, I. J., & Katz, S. (2014). Discrete emotions mediate perceptions of presidential candidates: A study using a nationally representative sample [Poster presented at the 26th Annual Convention, Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA].Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341Google Scholar
Keinan, G. (1987). Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 639–644.Google Scholar
Kosmidis, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Can social media incivility induce enthusiasm? Evidence from survey experiments. Public Opinion Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa014Google Scholar
Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Meulders, M. (2004). Every cloud has a silver lining: Interpersonal and individual differences determinants of anger-related behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1550–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271176Google Scholar
Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J., & De Boeck, P. (2003). The appraisal basis of anger: Specificity, necessity and sufficiency of components. Emotion, 3(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.254Google Scholar
Lambert, A., Scherer, L., Schott, J. P., et al. (2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: An integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 886–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019086Google Scholar
Lamprianou, I., & Ellinas, A. A. (2019). Emotion, sophistication and political behavior: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Political Psychology, 40(4), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12536Google Scholar
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1992). A motivational analyses of emotion: Reflex–cortex connections. Psychological Science, 3, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00255.xGoogle Scholar
Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2012). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, S., & Lang, A. (2009). Discrete emotion and motivation: Relative activation in the appetitive and aversive motivational systems as a function of anger, sadness, fear, and joy during televised information campaigns. Media Psychology, 12(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260902849927Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01433Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146Google Scholar
Lickel, B., Steele, R. R., & Schmader, T. (2011), Group‐based shame and guilt: Emerging directions in research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00340.xGoogle Scholar
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L., & Marcus, G. E. (2010). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.xGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C., & Rutherford, E. M. (1992). Anxiety and the selective processing of emotional information: Mediating roles of awareness, trait and state variables, and personal relevance of stimulus materials. Behavior Research and Therapy, 30, 479−491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(92)90032-CGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. E. (2003). The psychology of emotion and politics. In Sears, D. O. & Huddy, L. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 182–221). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., & MacKuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87, 672–685. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938743Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1963). The need to know and the fear of knowing. The Journal of General Psychology, 68, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1963.9920516Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2015). ‘I disrespectfully agree’: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089Google Scholar
Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998). A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018738019346Google Scholar
Mattern, J. (2014). On being convinced: An emotional epistemology of international relations. International Theory, 6(3), 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000323Google Scholar
Mattes, K., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2014). The positive case for negative campaigning. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mattes, K., Roseman, I. J., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2018). Contempt and anger in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. In Lucas, J. C., Galdieri, C. J., & Sisco, T. S. (Eds.), Conventional wisdom, parties, and broken barriers in the 2016 election (pp. 101–114). Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Matthes, J., Schmuck, D., & von Sikorski, C. (2019). Terror, terror everywhere? How terrorism news shape support for anti‐Muslim policies as a function of perceived threat severity and controllability. Political Psychology, 40(5), 935–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12576Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B., Holland, D., Thompson, B. A., & Koenig, A. (2020). Emotions and affective polarization: How enthusiasm and anxiety about presidential candidates affect interparty attitudes. American Politics Research, 48(2), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X19891423Google Scholar
Meijinders, A. L., Midden, C. J. H., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). Role of negative emotion in communication about CO2 risks. Risk Analysis, 21(5), 955–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.215164Google Scholar
Mercer, J. (2014). Feeling like state: Social emotion and identity. International Theory, 6(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000244Google Scholar
Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (2018). Contempt and disgust: The emotions of disrespect. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12159Google Scholar
Miu, A. C., Heilman, R. M., & Houser, D. (2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making: Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological Psychology, 77, 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.010Google Scholar
Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Miles, F., & Dixon, R. (2004). Time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: Testing the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18(5), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000158Google Scholar
Montiel, C. J., & Uyheng, J. (2020). Mapping contentious collective emotions in a populist democracy: Duterte’s push for Philippine federalism. Political Psychology, 41(4), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12648Google Scholar
Nai, A., Schemeil, Y., & Marie, J. L. (2017). Anxiety, sophistication, and resistance to persuasion: Evidence from a quasi‐experimental survey on global climate change. Political Psychology, 38, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12331Google Scholar
Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G. W., Crigler, A. N., & MacKuen, M. (2007). The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion and political thinking and behavior. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Obaidi, M., Bergh, R., Sidanius, J., & Thomsen, L. (2018). The mistreatment of my people: Victimization by proxy and behavioral intentions to commit violence among Muslims in Denmark. Political Psychology, 39(3), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12435Google Scholar
Quigley, B. M., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1996). Mediating effects of blame attributions on feelings of anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1280–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212008Google Scholar
Park, C. S. (2015). Applying ‘negativity bias’ to Twitter: Negative news on Twitter, emotions, and political learning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(4), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1100225Google Scholar
Phoenix, D. L. (2019). The anger gap: How race shapes emotion in politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 79(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.283Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P. (Ed.). (2006). Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A., & Lau, R. R. (2007). Affective intelligence and voting information processing and learning in a campaign. In Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Crigler, A. (Eds.), The affect effect: The political dynamics of thinking and feeling (pp. 152–179). The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226574431-007Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P., & Pierce, D. R. (2017). Emotions and voting. In Arzheimber, K., Evans, J., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of electoral behaviour (pp. 406–432). Sage.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P., Roseman, I. J., Mattes, K., & Katz, S. (2018). Donald Trump, contempt, and the 2016 GOP Iowa caucuses. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 28(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1441848Google Scholar
Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2016). The politics of hope: Donald Trump as an entrepreneur of identity. In Fitzduff, M. (Ed.), Why irrational politics appeals: Understanding the allure of Trump (pp. 25–40). Praeger.Google Scholar
Rico, G., Guinjoan, M., & Anduiza, E. (2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12261Google Scholar
Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality & Social Psychology, 5, 11–36.Google Scholar
Roseman, I. J. (2011). Emotional behaviors, emotivational goals, emotion strategies: Multiple levels of organization integrate variable and consistent responses. Emotion Review, 3(4), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410744Google Scholar
Roseman, I. J. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review, 5(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912469591Google Scholar
Roseman, I. J. (2018). Rejecting the unworthy: The causes, components, and consequences of contempt. In Mason, M. (Ed.), The moral psychology of contempt (pp. 107–130). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Roseman, I. J., Mattes, K., Redlawsk, D. P., & Katz, S. (2020). Reprehensible, laughable: The role of contempt in negative campaigning. American Politics Research, 48(1), 44–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X19857968Google Scholar
Ryan, T. J. (2012). What makes us click? Demonstrating incentives for angry discourse with digital-age field experiments. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1138–1152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000540Google Scholar
Salam, A. P., Rainford, E., van Vugt, M., & Ronay, R. (2017). Acute stress reduces perceived trustworthiness of male racial outgroup faces. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3(4), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0065-0Google Scholar
Salmela, M. (2014). The functions of collective emotions in social groups. In Konzelmann Ziv, A. & Schmid, H. (Eds.), Institutions, emotions, and group agents: Contributions to social ontology (Studies in the philosophy of sociality, Vol. 2, pp. 159–176). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6934-2_10Google Scholar
Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419Google Scholar
Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2018). Emotional dynamics of right-and left-wing political populism. Humanity & Society, 42(4), 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597618802521Google Scholar
Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–15078. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904312106Google Scholar
Shiota, M. N., Neufeld, S. L., Danvers, A. F., Osborne, E. A., Sng, O., & Yee, C. I. (2014). Positive emotion differentiation: A functional approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(3), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12092Google Scholar
Shiota, M. N., Neufeld, S. L., Yeung, W. H., Moser, S. E., & Perea, E. F. (2011). Feeling good: Autonomic nervous system responding in five positive emotions. Emotion, 11, 1368–1378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024278Google Scholar
Shook, N. J., Oosterhoff, B., Terrizzi, J. A. Jr., & Brady, K. M. (2017). ‘Dirty politics’: The role of disgust sensitivity in voting. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000111Google Scholar
Sirin, C. V., & Villalobos, J. D. (2019). The study of discrete emotions in politics. In Redlawsk, D. P. (Ed.), Oxford encyclopedia of political decision making. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.918Google Scholar
Sirin, C. V., Villalobos, J. D., & Valentino, N. A. (2016). Group Empathy Theory: The effect of group empathy on US intergroup attitudes and behavior in the context of immigration threats. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216676246Google Scholar
Small, D. A., & Lerner, J. S. (2008). Emotional policy: Personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology, 29, 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00621.xGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813Google Scholar
Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2016). Group-level emotions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 15–19. https://doi.org/B10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.005Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheavens, J., et al. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 820–826. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.820Google Scholar
Sparks, H. (2015). Mama grizzlies and guardians of the republic: The Democratic and intersectional politics of anger in the Tea Party Movement. New Political Science, 37(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2014.945252Google Scholar
Steen-Johnsen, K., & Winsvold, M. S. (2019). Islamist terrorism, out-group trust, and motivation to control prejudice. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, edz014. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz014Google Scholar
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media: Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–248. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408Google Scholar
Stohr, K. (2017, 23 January). Our new age of contempt. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/23/opinion/our-new-age-of-contempt.htmlGoogle Scholar
Stolwijk, S. B., Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). How anxiety and enthusiasm help explain the bandwagon effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(4), 554–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw018Google Scholar
Suhay, E., & Erisen, C. (2018). The role of anger in the biased assimilation of political information. Political Psychology, 39(4), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12463Google Scholar
Sylvers, P., Laprarie, J., & Lilienfeld, S. (2011). Differences between trait fear and trait anxiety: Implications for psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.004Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145Google Scholar
Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973Google Scholar
Tolbert, C. J., Redlawsk, D. P., & Gracey, K. J. (2018). Racial attitudes and emotional responses to the 2016 Republican candidates. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1441846Google Scholar
Tong, E. M. W. (2015). Differentiation of 13 positive emotions by appraisals. Cognitive Emotions, 29, 484–503.Google Scholar
Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000939Google Scholar
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.xGoogle Scholar
Valentino, N. A., & Neuner, F. G. (2017). Why the sky didn’t fall: Mobilizing anger in reaction to voter ID laws. Political Psychology, 38(2), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12332Google Scholar
van der Toorn, J., & Jost, J. T. (2014). Twenty years of system justification theory: Introduction to the special issue on ‘Ideology and system justification processes’. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(4), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214531509Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., Boiten, M., & Eendebak, L. (2015). Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215569706Google Scholar
Vasilopoulos, P., & Brouard, S. (2019). System justification and affective responses to terrorism: Evidence from the November 2015 Paris attacks. Political Psychology, 41(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12639Google Scholar
Vasilopoulos, P., Marcus, G. E., & Foucault, M. (2017). Emotional responses to the Charlie Hebdo attacks: Addressing the authoritarianism puzzle. Political Psychology, 39(3), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12439Google Scholar
Vasilopoulou, S., & Wagner, M. (2017). Fear, anger, and enthusiasm about the European Union: Effects of emotional reactions on public preferences towards European integration. European Union Politics, 18(3), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517698048Google Scholar
Walter, A., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2021). The effects of politician’s moral violations on voters’ moral emotions. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09749-zGoogle Scholar
Weise, D. R., Arciszewski, T., Verlhiac, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2011). Terror management and attitudes toward immigrants. European Psychologist, 17(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000056Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.Google Scholar
Yin, D., Bond, S., & Zhang, H. (2014). Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.10Google Scholar

References

Allen, G. L. (1994). The growth of children’s political knowledge during an election year. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40(3), 356–377. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23087350Google Scholar
Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic development. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909650300221XGoogle Scholar
Barrett, M. D., Born, M., Macek, P., et al. (2018). Processes influencing democratic ownership and participation (PIDOP) in nine European countries, 2009–2012. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37137.v1Google Scholar
Beck, P. M., & Jennings, M. K. (1982). Pathways to participation. American Political Science Review, 76(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960445Google Scholar
Bigler, R. S., Arthur, A. E., Hughes, J. M., & Patterson, M. M. (2008). The politics of race and gender: Children’s perceptions of discrimination and the U.S. presidency. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1), 83–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2008.00161.xGoogle Scholar
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.xGoogle Scholar
Bigler, R. S., & Wright, Y. F. (2014). Reading, writing, arithmetic, and racism? Risks and benefits to teaching children about intergroup biases. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12057Google Scholar
Bishop, B. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-2303Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, C. S. (2017). Discrimination in childhood and adolescence: A developmental intergroup approach. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208381Google Scholar
Brown, C. S., Alabi, B., Hyunh, V., & Masten, C. (2011). Ethnicity and gender in late childhood and early adolescence: Group identity and awareness of bias. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021819Google Scholar
Brown, C. S., & Lee, C. A. (2015). Impressions of immigration: Comparisons between immigrant and nonimmigrant children’s immigration beliefs. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12067Google Scholar
Cho, J., & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Structural antecedents to knowledge and participation: Extending the knowledge gap concept to participation. Journal of Communication, 57(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00340.xGoogle Scholar
Conway, M. M., Ahern, D., & Wyckoff, M. L. (1981). The mass media and changes in adolescents’ political knowledge during an election cycle. Political Behavior, 3, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989956Google Scholar
DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007). The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1187–1234. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187Google Scholar
Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2010). A social role theory perspective on gender gaps in political attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01598.xGoogle Scholar
Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 264–280.Google Scholar
Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.217Google Scholar
Geller, R. C. (2020). Teacher political disclosure in contentious times: A ‘responsibility to speak up’ or ‘fair and balanced’? Theory & Research in Social Education, 48(2), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1740125Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000031Google Scholar
Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2016). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738871Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R., Plutzer, E., & Sprague, J. (1993). Alternative contexts of political behavior: Churches, neighborhoods, and individuals. The Journal of Politics, 55(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132270Google Scholar
Hughes, J. M., & Bigler, R. S. (2011). Predictors of African American and European American adolescents’ endorsement of race-conscious social policies. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021309Google Scholar
Junn, J., & Masuoka, N. (2020). The gender gap is a race gap: Women voters in US presidential elections. Perspectives on Politics, 18(4), 1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719003876Google Scholar
Leshin, R. A., Vraneski-Shachnai, R., & Cimpian, A. (2019, March). Are presidents bossy? Boys’ and girls’ concepts of presidents differentially predict political aspirations [Poster presented at the 2019 Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Baltimore, MD].Google Scholar
Liben, L. S., Bigler, R. S., Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Powlishta, K. K. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2), i–183.Google Scholar
Lizotte, M. (2017). Gender differences in American political behavior. Scholars Strategy Network. https://scholars.org/contribution/gender-differences-american-political-behaviorGoogle Scholar
McDevitt, M. (2005). The partisan child: Developmental provocation as a model of political socialization. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh079Google Scholar
McIntosh, H., Hart, D., & Youniss, J. (2007). The influence of family political discussion on youth civic development: Which parent qualities matter? PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(3), 495–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096507070758Google Scholar
Orfield, G., Kucsera, J., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2012). E pluribus…separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. The Civil Rights Project. https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/mlk-nationalGoogle Scholar
Owen, D., & Dennis, J. (1988). Gender differences in the politicization of American children. Women & Politics, 8(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v08n02_02Google Scholar
Pacheco, J. S. (2008). Political socialization in context: The effect of political competition on youth voter turnout. Political Behavior, 30(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9057-xGoogle Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. M., Bigler, R. S., Pahlke, E., et al. (2019). Toward a developmental science of politics. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 84(3), 7–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12410Google Scholar
Patterson, M. M., Pahlke, E., & Bigler, R. S. (2013). Witnesses to history: Children’s views of race in the 2008 United States presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2012.01303.xGoogle Scholar
Payne, K. A., & Journell, W. (2019). ‘We have those kinds of conversations here…’: Addressing contentious politics with elementary students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2018.12.008Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2017, May 15). U.S. trails most developed countries in voter turnout. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/15/u-s-voter-turnout-trails-most-developed-countries/Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Routledge.Google Scholar
Rideout, V. (2017). The common sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. Common Sense Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/csm_zerotoeight_fullreport_release_2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/entmedia/mh012010pkg.cfmGoogle Scholar
Sears, D. O., & Valentino, N. A. (1997). Politics matters: Political events as catalysts for preadult socialization. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952258Google Scholar
Simon, A. (2017). How can we explain the gender gap in children’s political knowledge? American Behavioral Scientist, 61(2), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216689123Google Scholar
Stewart, E. A., Baumer, E. P., Brunson, R. K., & Simons, R. L. (2009). Neighborhood racial context and perceptions of police-based racial discrimination among Black youth. Criminology, 47(3), 847–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00159.xGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, S. (2007). If kids could vote: Children, democracy, and the media. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. (2017). Voting in America: A look at the 2016 presidential election. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2017/05/voting_in_america.htmlGoogle Scholar
van Deth, J. W., Abendschön, S., & Vollmar, M. (2011). Children and politics: An empirical reassessment of early political socialization. Political Psychology, 32(1), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00798.xGoogle Scholar
Wolak, J., & McDevitt, M. (2011). The roots of the gender gap in political knowledge in adolescence. Political Behavior, 33(3), 505–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11109-010-9142-9Google Scholar
Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00177Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×