Anderson, P., Fels, S., Harandi, N. M., Ho, A., Moisik, S., Sánchez, C. A. et al. (2017). FRANK: A hybrid 3D biomechanical model of the head and neck. In Payan, Y. and Ohayon, J., eds., Biomechanics of Living Organs. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 413–47.Google Scholar

Baer, T., Alphonso, P. J. & Honda, K. (1988). Electromyography of the tongue muscles during vowels in /əpVp/ environment. Annual Bulletin RILP, No. 22, 7–19.Google Scholar

Behrman, A., Dahl, L. D., Abramson, A. L. & Schutte, H. K. (2003). Anterior-posterior and medial compression of the supraglottis: Signs of nonorganic dysphonia or normal postures? Journal of Voice, 17(3), 403–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cattaneo, L. & Pavesi, G. (2014). The facial motor system. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 38, 135–59.Google Scholar

Chanaud, C. M., Pratt, C. A. & Loeb, G. E. (1991). Functionally complex muscles of the cat hindlimb. Experimental Brain Research, 85(2), 300–13.Google Scholar

Chang, Y., Cantelmi, D., Wisco, J. J., Fattah, A., Hannam, A. G. & Agur, A. M. (2013). Evidence for the functional compartmentalization of the temporalis muscle: A 3-dimensional study of innervation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 71(7), 1170–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cioffi, I., Gallo, L. M., Palla, S., Erni, S. & Farella, M. (2012). Macroscopic analysis of human masseter compartments assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Cells Tissues Organs, 195(5), 465–72.Google Scholar

Dang, J. & Honda, K. (1997). Acoustic characteristics of the piriform fossa in models and humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(1), 456–65.Google Scholar

Davies, J. C., Charles, M., Cantelmi, D., Liebgott, B., Ravichandiran, M., Ravichandiran, K. & Agur, A. M. (2012). Lateral pterygoid muscle: A three-dimensional analysis of neuromuscular partitioning. Clinical Anatomy, 25(5), 576–83.Google Scholar

Dayan, E. & Cohen, L. G. (2011). Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron, 72(3), 443–54.Google Scholar

Dediu, D., Janssen, R. & Moisik, S. R. (2017). Language is not isolated from its wider environment: Vocal tract influences on the evolution of speech and language. Language & Communication, 54, 9–20.Google Scholar

Delattre, P. & Freeman, D. C. (1968). A dialect study of American r’s by X-ray motion picture. Linguistics, 6(44), 29–68.Google Scholar

Delvaux, B. & Howard, D. (2014). A new method to explore the spectral impact of the piriform fossae on the singing voice: Benchmarking using MRI-based 3D-printed vocal tracts. PLoS One, 9(7), e102680.Google Scholar

De Troyer, A. D., Kirkwood, P. A. & Wilson, T. A. (2005). Respiratory action of the intercostal muscles. Physiological Reviews, 85(2), 717–56.Google Scholar

Eklund, R. (2008). Pulmonic ingressive phonation: Diachronic and synchronic characteristics, distribution and function in animal and human sound production and in human speech. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38(3), 235–324.Google Scholar

Esling, J. H. (1996). Pharyngeal consonants and the aryepiglottic sphincter. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 26(2), 65–88.Google Scholar

Ezzat, A. E. & El-Shenawy, H. M. (2015). Palatopharyngeus the missing palatal muscles: Anatomical and physiological review. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, 5(2), 226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fagel, S. (2010). Effects of smiling on articulation: Lips, larynx and acoustics. In Esposito, A., Campbell, N., Vogel, C., Hussain, A. & Nijholt, A. N., eds., Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 294–303.Google Scholar

Gick, B., Wilson, I. & Derrick, D. (2013). Articulatory Phonetics. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Guenther, F. H. (2016). Neural Control of Speech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hiiemae, K. M., Palmer, J. B., Medicis, S. W., Hegener, J., Jackson, B. S. & Lieberman, D. E. (2002). Hyoid and tongue surface movements in speaking and eating. Archives of Oral Biology, 47(1), 11–27.Google Scholar

Hirano, M. (1981). Clinical examination of voice. Disorders of Human Communication, 5, 1–99.Google Scholar

Hoit, J. D., Plassman, B. L., Lansing, R. W. & Hixon, T. J. (1988). Abdominal muscle activity during speech production. Journal of Applied Physiology, 65(6), 2656–64.Google Scholar

Honda, K., Murano, E. Z., Takano, S., Masaki, S. & Dang, J. (2013). Anatomical considerations on the extrinsic tongue muscles for articulatory modeling. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 133(5), 3607.Google Scholar

Hong, K. H., Ye, M., Kim, Y. M., Kevorkian, K. F. & Berke, G. S. (1997). The role of strap muscles in phonation: In vivo canine laryngeal model. Journal of Voice, 11(1), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, D. (2018). An Outline of English Phonetics, 9th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kakita, Y., Fujimura, O. & Honda, K. (1985). Computation of mapping from muscular contraction patterns to formant patterns in vowel space. In Fromkin, V., ed., Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged. Orlando FL: Academic Press, pp. 133–44.Google Scholar

Komisaruk, B. R., Mosier, K. M., Liu, W., Criminale, C., Zaborszky, L., Whipple, B. et al. (2002). Functional localization of brainstem and cervical spinal cord nuclei in humans with fMRI. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 23(4), 609–17.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. & Loeb, G. (2002). Preliminary studies on respiratory activity in speech. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 101, 50–60. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1qf5f44k.Google Scholar

Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leanderson, R., Persson, A. & Öhman, S. (1971). Electromyographic studies of facial muscle activity in speech. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 72(1–6), 361–9.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Magen, H. S., Kang, A. M., Tiede, M. K. & Whalen, D. H. (2003). Posterior pharyngeal wall position in the production of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(1), 241–51.Google Scholar

Mathieson, L. (2001). Greene and Mathieson’s the Voice and Its Disorders, 6th ed. London: Whurr.Google Scholar

McMicken, B., Salles, F., Berg, S. V., Vento-Wilson, M., Rogers, K., Toutios, A. et al. (2017). Bilabial substitution patterns during consonant production in a case of congenital aglossia. Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids, 5(2), e1000175Google Scholar

Minifie, F. D., Abbs, J. H., Tarlow, A. & Kwaterski, M. (1974). EMG activity within the pharynx during speech production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 17(3), 497–504.Google Scholar

Miyawaki, K., Hirose, H., Ushijima, T. & Sawashimi, M. (1975). A preliminary report on the electromyographic study of the lingual muscles. Annual Bulletin RILP, 9, 91–106.Google Scholar

Moll, K. L. (1962). Velopharyngeal closure on vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 5(1), 30–7.Google Scholar

Mu, L. & Sanders, I. (2010). Human tongue neuroanatomy: Nerve supply and motor endplates. Clinical Anatomy, 23(7), 777–91.Google Scholar

Ogata, S., Mine, K., Tamatsu, Y. & Shimada, K. (2002). Morphological study of the human chondroglossus muscle in Japanese. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, 184(5), 493–9.Google Scholar

Perkell, J. S. (1969). Physiology of Speech Production: Results and Implications of a Quantitative Cineradiography Study. MIT research monograph, no 53.Google Scholar

Perrier, P., Payan, Y., Buchaillard, S., Nazari, M. A. & Chabanas, M. (2011). Biomechanical models to study speech. Faits De Langues, 37, 155–71.Google Scholar

Saito, H. & Itoh, I. (2003). Three-dimensional architecture of the intrinsic tongue muscles, particularly the longitudinal muscle, by the chemical-maceration method. Anatomical Science International, 78(3), 168–76.Google Scholar

Saito, H. & Itoh, I. (2007). The three-dimensional architecture of the human styloglossus especially its posterior muscle bundles. Annals of Anatomy, 189(3), 261–7.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Y. (2018). Structural arrangement of the intrinsic muscles of the tongue and their relationships with the extrinsic muscles. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 40(6), 681–8.Google Scholar

Seaver, E. J. 3rd, & Kuehn, D. P. (1980). A cineradiographic and electromyographic investigation of velar positioning in non-nasal speech. The Cleft Palate Journal, 17(3), 216–26.Google Scholar

Stark, J., Ericsdotter, C., Branderud, P., Sundberg, J., Lundberg, H. & Lander, J. (1999). The APEX model as a tool in the specification of speaker-specific articulatory behavior. Proceedings from the XIVth ICPhS, San Francisco, 2279–82.Google Scholar

Takemoto, H. (2001). Morphological analyses of the human tongue musculature for three-dimensional modeling. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(1), 95–107.Google Scholar

Terada, S. & Sato, T. (1982). Nerve supply of the medial and lateral pterygoid muscles and its morphological significance. Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica, 59(4), 251–64.Google Scholar

Tuller, B., Harris, K. S. & Gross, B. (1981). Electromyographic study of the jaw muscles during speech. Journal of Phonetics, 9, 175–88.Google Scholar

Wilhelms-Tricarico, R. (1995). Physiological modeling of speech production: Methods for modeling soft-tissue articulators. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3085–98.Google Scholar

Wood, S. (1979). A radiographic analysis of constriction locations for vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 25–43.Google Scholar

Zagzebski, J. A. (1975). Ultrasonic measurement of lateral pharyngeal wall motion at two levels in the vocal tract. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 18(2), 308.Google Scholar

Adank, P., Smits, R. & van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3099–107.Google Scholar

Avelino, H. (2018). Mexico City Spanish (illustrations of the IPA). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 48(2), 223–30.Google Scholar

Barreda, S. (2015). phonTools: Tools for Phonetic and Acoustic Analyses (for R), retrieved from https://rdrr.io/cran/phonTools/, 9 October 2018.Google Scholar

Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.37, www.praat.org/.Google Scholar

Carignan, C., Shosted, R. K., Fu, M., Liang, Z. P. & Sutton, B. P. (2015). A real-time MRI investigation of the role of lingual and pharyngeal articulation in the production of the nasal vowel system of French. Journal of Phonetics, 50, 34–51.Google Scholar

Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Clopper, C. (2009). Computational methods for normalization acoustic vowel data for talker differences. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(6), 1430–42.Google Scholar

Cohn, A. C. (1993). Nasalization in English: Phonology or phonetics? Phonology, 10(1), 43–81.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English, 8th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Czaplicki, B. (2008). Decomposition of nasal vowels in Polish. In Marusic, F. and Zaucer, R., eds., Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 55–73.Google Scholar

Deterding, D. (1997). The formants of monophthong vowels in Standard Southern British English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 27, 47–55.Google Scholar

Esling, J. H. (2005). There are no back vowels: The laryngeal articulator model. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 50, 13–44.Google Scholar

Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. Vol. 2 of Description and Analysis of Contemporary Standard Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Gick, B., Wilson, I. & Derrick, D. (2013). Articulatory Phonetics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1166–83.Google Scholar

Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (1999). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. & Watson, C. I. (2000). Does the Queen speak the Queen’s English? Nature, 408, 927–8.Google Scholar

Hawkins, S. & Midgley, J. (2005). Formant frequencies of RP monophthongs in four age groups of speakers. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(2), 183–99.Google Scholar

Heselwood, B. (2013). Phonetics from ancient times up to the IPA. In Jones, M. J. & Knight, R.-A., eds., The Bloomsbury Companion to Phonetics. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 5–15.Google Scholar

Jacewicz, E., Fox, R. A. & Salmons, J. (2011). Cross-generational vowel change in American English. Language Variation and Change, 23, 45–86.Google Scholar

Jassem, W. (2003). Polish (illustrations of the IPA). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33(1), 103–7.Google Scholar

Jones, D. (1940). An Outline of English Phonetics, 6th ed. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar

Jones, D. (1972). An Outline of English Phonetics, 9th ed. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar

Jones, D. (2011). Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary, 18th ed., ed. by Roach, P., Setter, J. and Esling, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Joos, M. (1948). Acoustic phonetics. Language Monographs, 23, suppl. 1.Google Scholar

Kemp, J. A. (2001). The development of phonetics from the late 18th to the late 19th century. In Auroux, S., ed., History of the Language Sciences / Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften / Histoire des sciences du langage, vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1468–79.Google Scholar

Labov, W., Boberg, C. & Ash, S. (2005). Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. & Ferrari Disner, S. (2012). Vowels and Consonants, 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lindsey, G. (2012). The British English vowel system. http://englishspeechservices.com/blog/british-vowels/, accessed 11 August 2020.Google Scholar

Lindsey, G. (2013). The vowel space. http://englishspeechservices.com/blog/the-vowel-space/, accessed 11 August 2020.Google Scholar

Loehr, D. & van Guilder, L. (2012). Using the Internet for collecting phonological data. In Cohn, A. C., Fougeron, C. & Huffman, M. K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 441–9.Google Scholar

MacMahon, M. K. C. (2013). Orthography and the early history of phonetics. In Allan, K., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–22.Google Scholar

Mielke, J. (2015). An ultrasound study of Canadian French rhotic vowels with polar smoothing spline comparisons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137, 2858–69.Google Scholar

Morrison, G. S. & Assmann, P. F., eds. (2012). Vowel-Inherent Spectral Change. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Peterson, G. E. & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175–84.Google Scholar

Pike, K. L. (1943). Phonetics: A Critical Analysis of Phonetic Theory and a Technique for the Practical Description of Sounds, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Proctor, M., Lo, C. Y. & Narayanan, S. (2015). Articulation of English vowels in running speech: A real-time MRI study. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Glasgow, The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015, Paper# 220.Google Scholar

Recasens, D. &. Rodríguez, C. (2017). Lingual articulation and coarticulation for Catalan consonants and vowels: An ultrasound study. Phonetica, 74, 125–56.Google Scholar

Reddy, S. & Stanford, J. (2015). Toward completely automated vowel extraction: Introducing DARLA. Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenfelder, I., Fruehwald, J., Evanini, K., Seyfarth, S., Gorman, K., Prichard, H. et al. (2014). FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction) Program Suite v 1.2.2.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Miret, F. (1998). Some reflections on the notion of diphthong. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 34, 27–51.Google Scholar

Schwartz, G., Aperliński, G., Kaźmierski, K. & Weckwerth, J. (2016). Dynamic targets in the acquisition of L2 English vowels. Research in Language, 14(2), 181–202.Google Scholar

Šimáčková, Š., Podlipský, V. J. & Chládková, K. (2012). Czech spoken in Bohemia and Moravia. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42(2), 225–32.Google Scholar

Song, J. Y. (2017). The use of ultrasound in the study of articulatory properties of vowels in clear speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 31(5), 351–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teixeira, A., Martins, P., Oliveira, C., Ferreira, C., Silva, A. & Shosted, R. (2012). Real-time MRI for Portuguese. Database, methods and applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language. Berlin: Springer, pp. 306–17.Google Scholar

Upton, C., Kretzschmar, W. & Konopka, R. (2001). Oxford Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wells, J. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wells, J. (2008). Longman English Pronunciation Dictionary, 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar

Williams, D. & Escudero, P. (2014). A cross-dialectal acoustic comparison of vowels in Northern and Southern British English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(5), 2751–61.Google Scholar

Wissing, D. (2017). Afrikaans phonology: Segment inventory. www.taalportaal.org/taalportaal/topic/pid/topic-14610909940908011, last accessed 11 August 2020.Google Scholar

SPAN: Speech Production and Articulation Knowledge Group. The real-time MRI IPA charts, http://sail.usc.edu/span/rtmri_ipa/index.html. These include Cardinal Vowel charts with audio and fMRI video by four leading phoneticians.Google Scholar

Pink Trombone: Bare-handed speech synthesis, https://dood.al/pinktrombone/. An interactive vocal tract simulation, allowing the user to experiment with the effect of tongue position on the resulting sound.Google Scholar

Sound Comparisons, www.soundcomparisons.com. An interactive map-based website comparing lexical items diachronically and across related dialects and languages. Vowels constitute one of the major areas of comparison.Google Scholar

NORM: The vowel normalisation and plotting suite, http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/. A suite of software with an easy online interface for plotting and normalising vowel data.Google Scholar

FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction), http://fave.ling.upenn.edu/index.html. A comprehensive suite for forced alignment of audio and text data, and for automated analysis of vowel formants.Google Scholar

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Abramson, A. S. (1986). The perception of word-initial consonant length: Pattani Malay. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 16(1), 8–16.Google Scholar

Allen, W. S. (1981). The Greek contribution to the history of phonetics. In Asher, R. E. & Henderson, E. J., eds., Towards a History of Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 115–22.Google Scholar

Alwan, A., Narayanan, S. & Haker, K. (1997). Toward articulatory–acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part II. The rhotics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(2), 1078–89.Google Scholar

Aoki, H. (1970). A note on glottalized consonants. Phonetica, 21(2), 65–74.Google Scholar

Ball, M. J. (1990). The lateral fricative: Lateral or fricative? In Ball, M. J., Fife, J., Poppe, E. & Rowland, J., eds., Celtic Linguistics/Ieithyddiaeth Geltaidd. Readings in the Brythonic Languages: Festschrift for T. Arwyn Watkins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 109–25.Google Scholar

Barry, W. J. (1997). Another r-tickle. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 27(1–2), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, A. M. (1863). The Principles of Speech and Vocal Physiology, and Dictionary of Sounds, Etc. London: Hamilton & Adams.Google Scholar

Bird, S., Caldecott, M., Campbell, F., Gick, B. & Shaw, P. A. (2008). Oral–laryngeal timing in glottalised resonants. Journal of Phonetics, 36(3), 492–507.Google Scholar

Blevins, J. (2003). The phonology of Yurok glottalized sonorants: Segmental fission under syllabification. International Journal of American Linguistics, 69(4), 371–96.Google Scholar

Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (1988). Some notes on syllable structure in Articulatory Phonology. Phonetica, 45(2–4), 140–55.Google Scholar

Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. M. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6(2), 201–51.Google Scholar

Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. M. (1990). Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics, 18(3), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. M. (1992). Articulatory Phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49(3–4), 155–80.Google Scholar

Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (1995). Dynamics and Articulatory Phonology. In van Gelder, T. & Port, B., eds., Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 175–93.Google Scholar

Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. M. (2000). Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Bulletin de la Communication Parlée, 5, 25–34.Google Scholar

Brown, L. (2001). A Grammar of Nias Selatan. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Brücke, E. (1856). Grundzüge der Physiologie und Systematik der Sprachlaute für Linguisten und Traub-Stummenlehrer. Vienna: Carl Gerold.Google Scholar

Butcher, A. (2004). ‘Fortis/lenis’ revisited one more time: The aerodynamics of some oral stop contrasts in three continents. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18(6–8), 547–57.Google Scholar

Byrd, D., Tobin, S., Bresch, E. & Narayanan, S. (2009). Timing effects of syllable structure and stress on nasals: A real-time MRI examination. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 97–110.Google Scholar

Carignan, C., Shosted, R. K., Fu, M., Liang, Z.-P. & Sutton, B. P. (2015). A real-time MRI investigation of the role of lingual and pharyngeal articulation in the production of the nasal vowel system of French. Journal of Phonetics, 50, 34–51.Google Scholar

Catford, J. & Esling, J. (2006). Phonetics, articulatory. In Brown, K., ed., Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 425–42.Google Scholar

Catford, J. C. (1939). On the classification of stop consonants. Le Maître Phonétique, 65, 2–5.Google Scholar

Catford, J. C. (1964). Phonation types: The classification of some laryngeal components of speech production. In Abercrombie, D., ed., In Honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman, pp. 26–37.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. L. (1960). Seneca morphology I: Introduction. International Journal of American Linguistics, 26(1), 11–22.Google Scholar

Chen, W.-R., Chang, Y.-C. & Iskarous, K. (2015). Vowel coarticulation: Landmark statistics measure vowel aggression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 1221–32.Google Scholar

Chiba, T. & Kajiyama, M. (1941). The Vowel: Its Nature and Structure. Tokyo: Kaseikan.Google Scholar

Chitoran, I. (2002). A perception-production study of Romanian diphthongs and glide-vowel sequences. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 32/2, 203–22.Google Scholar

Cho, T., Jun, S.-A. & Ladefoged, P. (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics, 30(2), 193–228.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Cohn, A. C., Ham, W. H., & Podesva, R. J. (1999). The phonetic realization of singleton-geminate contrasts in three languages of Indonesia. In In J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville & A. C. Bailey, eds., Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 587–590). Berkeley, CA: ICPhS.Google Scholar

Colarusso, J. (1992). How many consonants does Ubykh have? In Hewitt, G., ed., Caucasian Perspectives. Munich: Lincom Europa, pp. 145–56.Google Scholar

Cooke, M., Barker, J., Cunningham, S. & Shao, X. (2006). An audio-visual corpus for speech perception and automatic speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 2421–4.Google Scholar

Coulmas, F., ed. (1999). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, F. & Fletcher, J. (2017). Australian English Pronunciation and Transcription. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dart, S. N. (1987). An aerodynamic study of Korean stop consonants: Measurements and modeling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(1), 138–47.Google Scholar

De Jong, K. (1998). Stress-related variation in the articulation of coda alveolar stops: Flapping revisited. Journal of Phonetics, 26(3), 283–310.Google Scholar

Delattre, P. & Freeman, D. C. (1968). A dialect study of American r’s by X-ray motion picture. Linguistics, 44, 29–68.Google Scholar

Demolin, D. (1995). The phonetics and phonology of glottalized consonants in Lendu. In Connell, B., Arvaniti, A., Kingston, J., Connell, B., Arvaniti, A. & Kingston, J., eds., Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 368–85.Google Scholar

Derrick, D. & Gick, B. (2011). Individual variation in English flaps and taps: A case of categorical phonetics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 56(3), 307–19.Google Scholar

DiCanio, C. T. (2012). The phonetics of fortis and lenis consonants in Itunyoso Trique. International Journal of American Linguistics, 78(2), 239–72.Google Scholar

Diehl, R. (1989). Remarks on Steven’s quantal theory of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17(1–2), 71–8.Google Scholar

Elliott, R. W. V. (1954). Isaac Newton as phonetician. The Modern Language Review, 49(1), 5–12.Google Scholar

Ernestus, M. (2014). Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua, 142, 27–41.Google Scholar

Esling, J. H. (2010). Phonetic notation. In Hardcastle, W. J., Laver, J. & Gibbon, F. E., eds., The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 678–702.Google Scholar

Esling, J. H. & Harris, J. G. (2005). States of the glottis: An articulatory phonetic model based on laryngoscopic observations. In Hardcastle, W. J. and & Beck, J. M., eds., A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Esling, J. H., Fraser, K. E. & Harris, J. G. (2005). Glottal stop, glottalized resonants, and pharyngeals: A reinterpretation with evidence from a laryngoscopic study of Nuuchahnulth (Nootka). Journal of Phonetics, 33(4), 383–410.Google Scholar

Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Jackson, M., Narayanan, S. & Alwan, A. (2000). Acoustic modeling of American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(1), 343–56.Google Scholar

Everett, D. L. (1986). Pirahã. In Derbyshire, D. C. & Pullum, G. K., eds., Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 200–326.Google Scholar

Ewan, W. G. & Krones, R. (1974). Measuring larynx movement using the thyroumbrometer. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 327–35.Google Scholar

Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic Theory of Speech Production, with Calculations Based on X-ray Studies of Russian Articulations. s’Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar

Firchow, I. & Firchow, J. (1969). An abbreviated phoneme inventory.Anthropological Linguistics, 11, 271–6.Google Scholar

Flemming, E., Ladefoged, P. & Thomason, S. (2008). Phonetic structures of Montana Salish. Journal of Phonetics, 36(3), 465–91.Google Scholar

Fletcher, S. G. & Newman, D. G. (1991). [s] and [ʃ] as a function of linguapalatal contact place and sibilant groove width. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 850–8.Google Scholar

Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 409–38.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A. (1994). Invariants, specifiers, cues: An investigation of locus equations as information for place of articulation. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 55(6), 597–610.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A. (2005). Parsing coarticulated speech in perception: Effects of coarticulation resistance. Journal of Phonetics, 33(2), 199–213.Google Scholar

Fu, M., Zhao, B., Carignan, C., Shosted, R. K., Perry, J. L., Kuehn, D. P. et al. (2015). High-resolution dynamic speech imaging with joint low-rank and sparsity constraints. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 73(5), 1820–32.Google Scholar

Fu, M., Barlaz, M. S., Holtrop, J. L., Perry, J. L., Kuehn, D. P., Shosted, R. K. et al. (2017). High-frame-rate full-vocal tract 3D dynamic speech imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 77(4), 1619–29.Google Scholar

Gick, B. (2002). The use of ultrasound for linguistic phonetic fieldwork. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 32(2), 113–21.Google Scholar

Gick, B. & Campbell, F. (2003). Intergestural timing in English /r/. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 1911–14.Google Scholar

Gick, B., Iskarous, K., Whalen, D. H. & Goldstein, L. M. (2003). Constraints on variations in the production of English /r/. In Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Speech Production, Sydney: ISSP, pp. 73–78.Google Scholar

Gick, B., Wilson, I. & Derrick, D. (2012). Articulatory Phonetics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Giles, S. B. & Moll, K. L. (1975). Cinefluorographic study of selected allophones of English /l/. Phonetica, 31(3–4), 206–27.Google Scholar

Gobl, C. (2010). Voice source variation and its communicative functions. In Hardcastle, W. J., Laver, J. & Gibbon, F. E., eds., The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 1, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 378–423.Google Scholar

Gobl, C. & Chasaide, A. N. (2003). The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude. Speech Communication, 40, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, L. & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Articulatory Phonology: A phonology for public language use. In Schiller, N. O. and & Meyer, A. S., eds., Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 159–207.Google Scholar

Goldstein, L., Chitoran, I. & Selkirk, E. (2007). Syllable structure as coupled oscillator modes: Evidence from Georgian vs. Tashlhiyt Berber. In Proc. XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 241–4.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. & Ladefoged, P. (2001). Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics, 29(4), 383–406.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. K. (2016). Phonological Typology, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grawunder, S., Simpson, A. P. & Khalilov, M. (2010). Phonetic characteristics of ejectives–samples from Caucasian languages. In Fuchs, S., Toda, M. & Żygis, M., eds., Turbulent Sounds: An Interdisciplinary Guide. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 209–44.Google Scholar

Guenther, F. H. (2016). Neural Control of Speech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guenther, F. H., Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Matthies, M. L., Zandipour, M. & Perkell, J. S. (1999). Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(5), 2854–65.Google Scholar

Güldemann, T. (2001). Phonological regularities of consonant systems across Khoisan lineages. University of Leipzig Papers on Africa, 16, 1–50.Google Scholar

Hagiwara, R. (1994). Three types of American /r/. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, pp. 55–62.Google Scholar

Ham, W. H. (2001). Phonetic and Phonological Aspects of Geminate Timing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hankamer, J., Lahiri, A. & Koreman, J. (1989). Perception of consonant length: Voiceless stops in Turkish and Bengali. Journal of Phonetics, 17(4), 283–98.Google Scholar

Hanson, H. M., Stevens, K. N., Kuo, H.-K. J., Chen, M. Y. & Slifka, J. (2001). Towards models of phonation. Journal of Phonetics, 29(4), 451–80.Google Scholar

Harrison, K. D. (2008). When Languages Die: The Extinction of the World’s Languages and the Erosion of Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hay, J. (2004). Causes and Consequences of Word Structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hay, J. & Drager, K. (2007). Sociophonetics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 89–103.Google Scholar

Henton, C., Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I. (1992). Stops in the world’s languages. Phonetica, 49(2), 65–101.Google Scholar

Hermes, A., Grice, M., Mücke, D. & Niemann, H. (2008). Articulatory indicators of syllable affiliation in word initial consonant clusters in Italian. In Sock, R., Fuchs, S. & Laprie, Y., eds., Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production. Strasbourg, France: INRIA, pp. 433–6.Google Scholar

Heselwood, B., Hassan, Z. M. & Jones, M. J. (2013). Historical overview of phonetics. In Jones, M. J. and Knight, R.-A., eds., The Bloomsbury Companion to Phonetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 5–20.Google Scholar

Hoole, P. (1998). Do airstream mechanisms influence tongue movement paths? Phonetica, 55(3), 131–46.Google Scholar

Hoole, P. & Pouplier, M. (2017). Öhman returns: New horizons in the collection and analysis of imaging data in speech production research. Computer Speech & Language, 45 (Supplement C), 253–77.Google Scholar

Hualde, J. I. (2005). The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hueber, T., Aversano, G., Cholle, G., Denby, B., Dreyfus, G., Oussar, Y. et al. (2007). Eigentongue feature extraction for an ultrasound-based silent speech interface. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing – ICASSP07, I-1245– I-1248.Google Scholar

Idemaru, K. & Guion, S. G. (2008). Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38(2), 167–86.Google Scholar

Iskarous, K. (2006). The articulation of the palatal gesture in American English [r]. In Yehia, H., Demolin, D. & Laboissiere, R., eds., Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP), Ubatuba. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, pp. 341–8.Google Scholar

Iskarous, K., Fowler, C. A. & Whalen, D. H. (2010). Locus equations are an acoustic expression of articulator synergy. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), 2021–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Iskarous, K., Shadle, C. H. & Proctor, M. I. (2011). Articulatory–acoustic kinematics: The production of American English /s/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(2), 944–54.Google Scholar

Israel, A., Proctor, M., Goldstein, L., Iskarous, K. & Narayanan, S. S. (2012). Emphatic segments and emphasis spread in Lebanese Arabic: a Real-time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. In Proc. Int’l Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology, Portland, OR, pp. 2178–81.Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. (1889). The Articulations of Speech Sounds Represented by Means of Analphabetic Symbols. Marburg in Hessen: NG Elwert.Google Scholar

Johnson, K. (2011). Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. W. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: AN exemplar model. In Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. W., eds., Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 145–66.Google Scholar

Kang, Y. (2014). Voice Onset Time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics, 45, 76–90.Google Scholar

Katsamanis, A., Black, M., Georgiou, P., Goldstein, L. & Narayanan, S. (2011). SailAlign: Robust long speech-text alignment. In Proc. Workshop on New Tools and Methods for Very-Large Scale Phonetics Research. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, pp. 44–7.Google Scholar

Kelso, J. S., Tuller, B. & Harris, K. S. (1983). A ‘dynamic pattern’ perspective on the control and coordination of movement. In MacNeilage, P. F., ed., The Production of Speech. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 137–73.Google Scholar

Kemp, J. A. (2006). Phonetic transcription: History. In Brown, K., ed., Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 396–410.Google Scholar

Khan, S., Esposito, C. M. & Hurst, A. (2007). Breathy nasals and /Nh/ clusters in Bengali, Hindi, and Marathi. Indian Linguistics, 68, 275.Google Scholar

Kim, C.-W. (1965). On the autonomy of the tensity feature in stop classification (with special reference to Korean stops). Word, 21(3), 339–59.Google Scholar

Kim, H., Honda, K. & Maeda, S. (2005). Stroboscopic-cine MRI study of the phasing between the tongue and the larynx in the Korean three-way phonation contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 33(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. (1991). Economy and the construction of the Sivasutras. In Deshpande, M. & Bhate, S., eds., Paninian Studies. S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for South Asian Studies, University of Michigan, pp. 239–61.Google Scholar

Kirchner, R. (2000). Geminate inalterability and lenition. Language, 76(3), 509–45.Google Scholar

Krakow, R. A. (1999). Physiological organization of syllables: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 27(1), 23–54.Google Scholar

Kühnert, B., Hoole, P. & Mooshammer, C. (2006). Gestural overlap and C-center in selected French consonant clusters. In Yehia, H., Demolin, D. & Laboissiere, R., eds., Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP). Ubatuba. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, pp. 327–34.Google Scholar

Kuperman, V., Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M. & Baayen, H. (2007). Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2261–71.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (1968). A Phonetic Study of West African Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (2005). Vowels and Consonants, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. & Johnson, K. (2014). A Course in Phonetics, 7th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. & Traill, A. (1994). Clicks and their accompaniments. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 33–64.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P., Williamson, K. & Elugbe, B. U. (1976). The stops of Owerri Igbo. Studies in African Linguistics, 7, 147–63.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P., Cochran, A. & Disner, S. (1977). Laterals and trills. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 7(2), 46–54.Google Scholar

Lammert, A., Goldstein, L., Narayanan, S. & Iskarous, K. (2013). Statistical methods for estimation of direct and differential kinematics of the vocal tract. Speech Communication, 55(1), 147–61.Google Scholar

Lancia, L., Voigt, D. & Krasovitskiy, G. (2016). Characterization of laryngealization as irregular vocal fold vibration and interaction with prosodic prominence. Journal of Phonetics, 54(Supplement C), 80–97.Google Scholar

Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Laver, J. D. (1968). Voice quality and indexical information. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3(1), 43–54.Google Scholar

Lepsius, C. R. (1863). Standard Alphabet for Reducing Unwritten Languages and Foreign Graphic Systems to a Uniform Orthography in European Letters, 2nd ed. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar

Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74(6), 431.Google Scholar

Lindau, M. (1984). Phonetic differences in glottalic consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 147–55.Google Scholar

Lindblom, B. & Engstrand, O. (1989). In what sense is speech quantal? Journal of Phonetics, 17(1–2), 107–21.Google Scholar

Lindblom, B. & Maddieson, I. (1988). Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In Hyman, L. M. & Li., C. N., eds., Language, Speech, and Mind: Studies in Honour of Victoria A. Fromkin. London: Routledge, pp. 62–78.Google Scholar

Lindblom, B. & Sussman, H. M. (2012). Dissecting coarticulation: How locus equations happen. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Lindblom, B., MacNeilage, P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1983). Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals. Linguistics, 21(1), 181–204.Google Scholar

Lingala, S. G., Zhu, Y., Kim, Y.-C., Toutios, A., Narayanan, S. & Nayak, K. S. (2017). A fast and flexible MRI system for the study of dynamic vocal tract shaping. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 77(1), 112–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.Google Scholar

Loos, E. E., Anderson, S., Day, D. H., Jordan, P. C. & Wingate, J. D. (2004). Glossary of Linguistic Terms, vol. 29. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. (1980). Phonological generalizations from the UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database (UPSID). UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 50, 57–68.Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. (1992). UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. (2013a). Consonant inventories. In Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M., eds., The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/1, accessed on 11 August 2020).Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. (2013b). Glottalized consonants. In Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M., eds., The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/7, accessed on 11 August 2020.Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. & Emmorey, K. (1984). Is there a valid distinction between voiceless lateral approximants and fricatives? Phonetica, 41(4), 181–90.Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. & Emmorey, K. (1985). Relationship between semivowels and vowels: Cross-linguistic investigations of acoustic difference and coarticulation. Phonetica, 42(4), 163–74.Google Scholar

Marin, S. & Pouplier, M. (2010). Temporal organization of complex onsets and codas in American English: Testing the predictions of a gestural coupling model. Motor Control, 14(3), 380–407.Google Scholar

Marin, S. & Pouplier, M. (2014). Articulatory synergies in the temporal organization of liquid clusters in Romanian. Journal of Phonetics, 42, 24–36.Google Scholar

McDonough, J. & Wood, V. (2008). The stop contrasts of the Athabaskan languages. Journal of Phonetics, 36(3), 427–49.Google Scholar

McGowan, R. S. (1992). Tongue-tip trills and vocal-tract wall compliance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(5), 2903–10.Google Scholar

McGowan, R. S. & Howe, M. S. (2007). Compact green’s functions extend the acoustic theory of speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 35(2), 259–70.Google Scholar

McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A. & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1113–26.Google Scholar

Mielke, J. (2007). P-base. http://pbase.phon.chass.ncsu.edu/.Google Scholar

Mielke, J. (2008). The Emergence of Distinctive Features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mielke, J., Baker, A. & Archangeli, D. (2016). Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /r/. Language, 92(1), 101–40.Google Scholar

Miller, A. (2010). Tongue body and tongue root shape differences in N|uu clicks correlate with phonotactic patterns. In Fuchs, S., Toda, M. & Żygis, M., eds., Turbulent sounds. An interdisciplinary guide. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 245–80.Google Scholar

Miller, A. L. (2011). The representation of clicks. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E. & Rice, K., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, vol. 1, chap. 18. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 416–39.Google Scholar

Mohammed, M. A. (2001). Modern Swahili Grammar. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers.Google Scholar

Moisik, S. R. & Esling, J. H. (2014). Modeling the biomechanical influence of epilaryngeal stricture on the vocal folds: A low-dimensional model of vocal–ventricular fold coupling. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(2), S687–S704.Google Scholar

Moisik, S. R., Esling, J. H. & Crevier-Buchman, L. (2010). A high-speed laryngoscopic investigation of aryepiglottic trilling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3), 1548–58.Google Scholar

Monnot, M. & Freeman, M. (1972). A comparison of Spanish single-tap /r/ with American /t/ and /d/ in post-stress intervocalic position. In Valdman, A., ed., Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 409–16.Google Scholar

Moran, S., McCloy, D. & Wright, R., eds. (2019). PHOIBLE Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://phoible.org, accessed on 11 August 2020.Google Scholar

Muller, J. S. (2002). On the theoretical implications of Cypriot Greek initial geminates. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 3(1), 115–37.Google Scholar

Munhall, K. G., Ostry, D. J. & Parush, A. (1985). Characteristics of velocity profiles of speech movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(4), 457.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, H. (2006). Aspects of the Phonetic and Phonological Structure of the G|ui language, PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar

Nam, H., Goldstein, L., Browman, C., Rubin, P., Proctor, M. & Saltzman, E. (2006). TADA (TAsk Dynamics Application) Manual. Available online at https://haskinslabs.org/research/features-and-demos/tada-task-dynamic-model-inter-articulator-speech-coordination, accessed on 11 August 2020.Google Scholar

Narayanan, S., Byrd, D. & Kaun, A. (1999). Geometry, kinematics, and acoustics of Tamil liquid consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(4), 1993–2007.Google Scholar

Narayanan, S., Toutios, A., Ramanarayanan, V., Lammert, A., Kim, J., Lee, S. et al. (2014). Real-time magnetic resonance imaging and electromagnetic articulography database for speech production research (TC). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(3), 1307–11.Google Scholar

Nash, D. (1980). Topics in Warlpiri Grammar. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, T. R. & Huyghues-Despointes, C. M. J. I. (2009). Muscular stiffness. In Binder, M. D., Hirokawa, N. & Windhorst, U., eds., Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Berlin: Springer, pp. 2515–19.Google Scholar

Niebergall, A., Zhang, S., Kunay, E., Keydana, G., Job, M., Uecker, M. et al. (2013). Real-time MRI of speaking at a resolution of 33 ms: Undersampled radial FLASH with nonlinear inverse reconstruction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 69(2), 477–85.Google Scholar

Nieto-Castanon, A., Guenther, F. H., Perkell, J. S. & Curtin, H. D. (2005). A modeling investigation of articulatory variability and acoustic stability during American English /r/ production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(5), 3196–212.Google Scholar

Nolan, F., Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, et al. (1999). Introduction to the IPA. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 25(1), 3–33.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. (1975). Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns. In Ferguson, C. A., Hyman, L. M. & Ohala, J. J., eds., Nasalfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization. Stanford, CA: Language Universals Project, pp. 289–316.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A. & Miller, M. F., eds., Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, Chicago Linguistic Society, May 1–2, 1981. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 178–203.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. (1983). The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In MacNeilage, P. F., ed., The Production of Speech, chap. 9. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 189–216.Google Scholar

Olson, K. (2004). Acoustic Correlates of the Labial Flap. Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, January 2004, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Oquendo, L. (2004). La vibrant uvular y la approximate labiodental en la lengua japreria como cultura fonológica. Opción, 20(45), 60–74.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Bybee, J. L. and & Hopper, P., eds., Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137–57.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N., eds., Laboratory Phonology, vol. 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 101–39.Google Scholar

Pinho, C. M., Jesus, L. M. & Barney, A. (2012). Weak voicing in fricative production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(5), 625–38.Google Scholar

Pinkerton, S. (1986). Quichean (Mayan) glottalized and nonglottalized stops: A phonetic study with implications for phonological universals. In Ohala, J. & Jaeger, J., eds., Experimental Phonology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 125–39.Google Scholar

Podesva, R. J. & Callier, P. (2015). Voice quality and identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 173–94.Google Scholar

Pouplier, M. & Beňuš, Š. (2011). On the phonetic status of syllabic consonants: Evidence from Slovak. Laboratory Phonology, 2(2), 243–73.Google Scholar

Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (2008). Syllable structure typology: The CV theory. In McCarthy, J. J., ed., Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 105–18.Google Scholar

Proctor, M. & Walker, R. (2012). Articulatory bases of English liquids. In Parker, S., ed., The Sonority Controversy, vol. 18 of Studies in Generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 285–312.Google Scholar

Proctor, M. I., Shadle, C. H. & Iskarous, K. (2010). Pharyngeal articulation differences in voiced and voiceless fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3), 1507–18.Google Scholar

Proctor, M., Bresch, E., Byrd, D., Nayak, K. & Narayanan, S. (2013). Paralinguistic mechanisms of production in human ‘beatboxing’: A realtime magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(2), 1043–54.Google Scholar

Proctor, M., Zhu, Y., Lammert, A., Toutios, A., Sands, B., Hummel, U. & Narayanan, S. (2016). Lingual consonant production in Khoekhoe: A real-time MRI study. In Shah, S. & Brenzinger, M., eds., Khoisan Languages and Linguistics – Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium, July 13–17, 2014, Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, pp. 337–66.Google Scholar

Ramanarayanan, V., Parrell, B., Goldstein, L., Nagarajan, S. & Houde, J. (2016). A new model of speech motor control based on task dynamics and state feedback. In Proc. Int’l Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology, pp. 3564–8.Google Scholar

Recasens, D. (1983). Place cues for nasal consonants with special reference to Catalan. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73(4), 1346–53.Google Scholar

Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Pisoni, D. B. & Carrell, T. D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212(4497), 947–9.Google Scholar

Remijsen, B. & Gilley, L. (2008). Why are three-level vowel length systems rare? Insights from Dinka (Luanyjang dialect). Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 318–44.Google Scholar

Ridouane, R. (2008). Syllables without vowels: Phonetic and phonological evidence from Tashlhiyt Berber. Phonology, 25(2), 321–59.Google Scholar

Ridouane, R. (2010). Geminates at the junction of phonetics and phonology. Laboratory Phonology, 10, 61–90.Google Scholar

Roon, K., Gafos, A. I., Hoole, P. & Zeroual, C. (2007). Influence of articulator and manner on stiffness. In Proc. Int’l. Congress on Phonetic Sciences, pp. 409–12.Google Scholar

Saltzman, E. L. & Munhall, K. G. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1(4), 333–82.Google Scholar

Schutz, A. J. (1980). A reanalysis of the Hawaiian vowel system. Oceanic Linguistics, 20, 1–43.Google Scholar

Scobbie, J. M. & Pouplier, M. (2010). The role of syllable structure in external sandhi: An EPG study of vocalisation and retraction in word-final English /l/. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 240–59.Google Scholar

Shadle, C. H. (1990). Articulatory–acoustic relationships in fricative consonants. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A., eds., Speech Production and Speech Modelling, vol. 55. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 187–209.Google Scholar

Shadle, C. (1999). The aerodynamics of speech. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Laver, J., eds., The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 33–64.Google Scholar

Shaw, J., Gafos, A., Hoole, P. & Zeroual, C. (2009). Temporal evidence for syllabic structure in Moroccan Arabic: Data and model. Phonology, 26(1), 187–215.Google Scholar

Shosted, R. K. (2006). The Aeroacoustics of Nasalized Fricatives, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Simons, G. F. & Fennig, C. D., eds. (2017). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 20th ed. Dallas: SIL International, www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar

Smith, C. L. (1993). The Timing of Vowel and Consonant Gestures. PhD thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar

Snyman, J. W. (1975). Zhu/’hõasi fonologie & woordeboek. Cape Town: A.A. Balkema; University of Cape Town.Google Scholar

Solé, M.-J. (2002). Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning. Journal of Phonetics, 30(4), 655–88.Google Scholar

Son, M.-J., Kim, S.-H. & Cho, T.-H. (2011). Supralaryngeal articulatory characteristics of coronal consonants in Korean. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 3(4), 33–43.Google Scholar

Sproat, R. & Fujimura, O. (1993). Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics, 21(3), 291–311.Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. (1971). Airflow and turbulence noise for fricative and stop consonants: Static considerations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 50(4B), 1180–92.Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. (1977). Physics of laryngeal behavior and larynx modes. Phonetica, 34(4), 264–79.Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17(1–2), 3–45.Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. (2004). Invariance and variability in speech: Interpreting acoustic evidence. In Slifka, J., Manuel, S. & Mathies, M., eds., From Sound to Sense: 50+ Years of Discoveries in Speech Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 77–B85.Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. & Blumstein, S. E. (1978). Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(5), 1358–68.Google Scholar

Sussman, H. M. & Shore, J. (1996). Locus equations as phonetic descriptors of consonantal place of articulation. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 58(6), 936–46.Google Scholar

Sweet, H. (1877). A Handbook of Phonetics, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Tillmann, H. (2006). Experimental and instrumental phonetics: History. In Brown, K., ed., Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 374–89.Google Scholar

Tilsen, S. & Goldstein, L. (2012). Articulatory gestures are individually selected in production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(6), 764–79.Google Scholar

Titze, I. R. & Story, B. H. (1997). Acoustic interactions of the voice source with the lower vocal tract. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2234–43.Google Scholar

Toda, M. & Honda, K. (2003). An MRI-based cross-linguistic study of sibilant fricatives. In Palethorpe, S. & Tabain, M., eds., Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Speech Production. Sydney: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, pp. 290–5.Google Scholar

Tourville, J. A. & Guenther, F. H. (2011). The diva model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 952–81.Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1969). Principles of Phonology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Turpin, M., Ross, A. & Staff, I. P. (2012). Kaytetye to English Dictionary. Alice Springs: IAD Press.Google Scholar

Viswanathan, N., Magnuson, J. S. & Fowler, C. A. (2014). Information for coarticulation: Static signal properties or formant dynamics? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 1228.Google Scholar

Vogt, H. (1963). Dictionnaire de la langue oubykh: avec introduction phonologique, index français-oubykh, textes oubykhs. Oslo: Universitets forlaget.Google Scholar

Volney, Constantin-Fran (1795). Simplification des langues orientales. Paris: L’imprimerie de la République.Google Scholar

Wagner, K. O. C. & Baker-Smemoe, W. (2013). An investigation of the production of ejectives by native (L1) and second (L2) language speakers of Q’eqchi’ Mayan. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 453–67.Google Scholar

Westbury, J. R., Hashi, M. & Lindstrom, M. J. (1998). Differences among speakers in lingual articulation for American English /r/. Speech Communication, 26(3), 203–26.Google Scholar

Wilkins, J. (1668). An Essay Towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: Sa. Gellibrand.Google Scholar

Zawadzki, P. A. & Kuehn, D. P. (1980). A cineradiographic study of static and dynamic aspects of American English /r/. Phonetica, 37, 253–66.Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S., Tiede, M., Holland, C. & Choe, A. (2008). A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of ‘retroflex’ and ‘bunched’ American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 4466–81.Google Scholar

Zhu, Y., Kim, Y.-C., Proctor, M. I., Narayanan, S. & Nayak, K. S. (2013). Dynamic 3D visualization of vocal tract shaping during speech. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, 32(5), 838–48.Google Scholar

Zue, V. W. & Laferriere, M. (1979). Acoustic study of medial /t, d/ in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(4), 1039–50.Google Scholar

Alfonso, P. J. & Baer, T. (1982). Dynamics of vowel articulation. Language and Speech, 25(2), 151–73.Google Scholar

Bell, A. (1867). Visible Speech: Universal Alphabetics or Self-Interpreting Physiological Letters for the Writing of all Languages in One Alphabet. London: Simpkin & Marschall.Google Scholar

Bell-Berti, F. & Harris, K. (1981). A temporal model of speech production. Phonetica, 38, 9–20.Google Scholar

Bell-Berti, F., Krakow, R. A., Gelfer, C. E. & Boyze, S. E. (1995). Anticipatory and carryover effects: Implications for models of speech production. In F. Bell-Berti & L. J. Raphael, eds., Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues (for Katherine Stafford Harris). College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar

Benguerel, A. P. & Cowan, H. A. (1974). Coarticulation of upper lip protrusion in French. Phonetica, 30, 41–55.Google Scholar

Bird, S. & Klein, E. (1990). Phonological events. Journal of Linguistics, 26(1), 33–56.Google Scholar

Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, J., ed., The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 206–44.Google Scholar

Bombien, L., Mooshammer, C., Hoole, P. & Kühnert, B. (2010). Prosodic and segmental effects on EPG contact patterns of word-initial German clusters. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 388–403.Google Scholar

Bombien, L., Mooshammer, C. & Hoole, P. (2013). Articulatory coordination in word-initial clusters of German. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 546–61.Google Scholar

Bradlow, A. R. (2002). Confluent talker-and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N., eds., Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

Broad, D. & Clermont, F. (1987). A methodology for modelling vowel formant contours in CVC context. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 155–65.Google Scholar

Broad, D. & Clermont, F. (2010). Target-locus scaling methods for modelling families of formant transitions. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 337–59.Google Scholar

Broad, D. & Clermont, F. (2014). A method for analyzing the coarticulated CV & VC components of vowel-formant trajectories in CVC syllables. Journal of Phonetics, 47, 47–80.Google Scholar

Broad, D. & Clermont, F. (2017). Target-locus scaling for modeling formant transitions in vowel + consonant + vowel contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141, 192.Google Scholar

Broad, D. & Fertig, R. (1970). Formant frequency trajectories in selected CVC syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 47, 1572–82.Google Scholar

Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (1988). Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology. Phonetica, 45, 140–55.Google Scholar

Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6(2), 201–51.Google Scholar

Browman, C. P. &. Goldstein, L. (1991). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston, J. & Beckman, M. E., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 341–76.Google Scholar

Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (2000). Competing constraints on intergestural coordination & self-organization of phonological structures. Les Cahiers de l’ICP, 5, 25–34.Google Scholar

Brücke, E. (1856). Grundzüge der Physiologie und Systematik der Sprachlaute für Linguisten und Taubstummenlehrer. Vienna: Gerold.Google Scholar

Brunner, J., Fuchs, S. & Perrier, P. (2011). Supralaryngeal control in Korean velar stops. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 178–95.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. (2012). Patterns of lexical diffusion and articulatory motivation for sound change. In Solé, M.-J. & Recasens, D., eds., The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production and Social Factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 211–34.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. & Scheibman, J. (1999). The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, 37(4), 575–96.Google Scholar

Byrd, D. & Choi, S. (2010). At the juncture of prosody, phonology & phonetics: The interaction of phrasal & syllable structure in shaping the timing of consonant gestures. Laboratory Phonology, 10, 31–59.Google Scholar

Byrd, D. & Saltzman, E. (1998). Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 26(2), 173–99.Google Scholar

Byrd, D. & Saltzman, E. (2003). The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics, 31(2), 149–80.Google Scholar

Byrd, D., Kaun, A., Naranyanan, S. & Saltzman, E. (2000). Phrasal signatures in articulation. Laboratory Phonology, 5, 70–87.Google Scholar

Byrd, D., Krivokapić, J. & Lee, S. (2006). How far, how long: On the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(3), 1589–99.Google Scholar

Byrd, D., Tobin, S., Bresch, E. & Narayanan, S. (2009). Timing effects of syllable structure and stress on nasals: a real-time MRI examination. Journal of Phonetics, 37(1), 97–110.Google Scholar

Chen, W., Chang, Y. & Iskarous, K. (2015). Vowel coarticulation: Landmark statistics measure vowel aggression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 4167–89.Google Scholar

Cho, T. (2016). Prosodic boundary strengthening in the phonetics–prosody interface. Language & Linguistics Compass, 10(3), 120–41.Google Scholar

Coker, C. H. (1976). A model of articulatory dynamics and control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 64, 452–60.Google Scholar

Ernestus, M., Lahey, M., Verhees, F. & Baayen, R. H. (2006). Lexical frequency and voice assimilation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(2), 1040–51.Google Scholar

Fougeron, C. (2001). Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 109–35.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A. (1980). Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing control. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113–33.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A. (1996). Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(3), 1730–41.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A. & Brown, J. M. (2000). Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information for vowels. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 62(1), 21–32.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A. & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers’ signaling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory & Language, 26(5), 489–504.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A. & Saltzman, E. (1993). Coordination and coarticulation in speech production. Language and Speech, 36(2–3), 171–95.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A. & Turvey, M. T. (1978). Skill acquisition: An event approach with special reference to searching for the optimum of a function of several variables. In Stelmach, G. E., ed., Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A., Rubin, P., Remez, R. & Turvey, M. (1980). Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In Butterworth, B., ed., Language Production, Vol.1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press, pp. 373–420.Google Scholar

Fujimura, O. (1986). Relative invariance of articulatory movements: An iceberg model. In Perkell, J. S. & Klatt, D. H., eds., Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 226–42.Google Scholar

Geng, C. (2010). A Cross-Linguistic Study on the Phonetics of Dorsal Obstruents. Doctoral dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philosophische Fakultät II.Google Scholar

Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1166–83.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Maldon, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goldstein, L., Chitoran, I. & Selkirk, E. (2007). Syllabic structure as coupled oscillator modes: Evidence from Georgian vs. Tashlhiyt Berber. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Germany: Saarbrücken, pp. 241–4.Google Scholar

Green, J. R., Moore, C. A. & Reilly, K. J. (2002). The sequential development of jaw and lip control for speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 66–79.Google Scholar

Harrington, J., Fletcher, J. & Roberts, C. (1995). Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction: Evidence from jaw movement data. Journal of Phonetics, 23(3), 305–22.Google Scholar

Harrington, J., Kleber, F. & Reubold, U. (2008).Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(5), 25–2835.Google Scholar

Holt, L. L. & Kluender, K. R. (2000). General auditory processes contribute to perceptual accommodation of coarticulation. Phonetica, 57(2–4), 170–80.Google Scholar

Hombert, J. M., Ohala, J. J. & Ewan, W. G. (1979). Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language, 55, 37–58.Google Scholar

Hoole, P., Munhall, K. & Mooshammer, C. (1998). Do airstream mechanisms influence tongue movement paths? Phonetica, 55(3), 131–46.Google Scholar

Houde, R. (1968). A Study of Tongue Body Motion During Selected Speech Sounds. Speech Communications Research Laboratory, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar

Iskarous, K. (2016). Compatible dynamical models of environmental, perceptual, and sensory systems. Ecological Psychology, 28, 295–311.Google Scholar

Iskarous, K. (2017). The relation between the continuous and the discrete: A note on the first principles of speech dynamics. Journal of Phonetics, 64, 8–20.Google Scholar

Iskarous, K. & Kavitskaya, D. (2018). Sound change and the structure of synchronic variability: Phonetic and phonological factors in Slavic palatalization. Language, 94(1), 43–83.Google Scholar

Iskarous, K., Shadle, C. H. & Proctor, M. I. (2011). Articulatory–acoustic kinematics: The production of American English /s/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(2), 944–54.Google Scholar

Iskarous, K., Mooshammer, C., Hoole, P., Recasens, D., Shadle, C. H., Saltzman, E. & Whalen, D. H. (2013). The Coarticulation/Invariance Scale: Mutual information as a measure of coarticulation resistance, motor synergy, and articulatory invariance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 1271–84.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R., Fant, G. & Halle, M. (1952). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates. Technical Report 13. Massachusetts, MA: Acoustics Laboratory, MIT.Google Scholar

Jones, D. (1932). Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Katsika, A., Whalen, D. H., Tiede, M. & King, H. (2015). Articulatory measures of planned and unplanned coarticulation. In Proceedings of the International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow.Google Scholar

Keating, P. A. (1990). The window model of coarticulation: articulatory evidence. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I, 26, 451–70.Google Scholar

Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C. & Hsu, C. S. (2004). Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI, 143–61.Google Scholar

Kim, J., Erickson, D., Lee, S. & Narayanan, S. (2014). A study of invariant properties and variation patterns in the Converter/Distributor model for emotional speech. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH, 2014, ISCA, Singapore, pp. 413–17.Google Scholar

Kühnert, B. & Nolan, F. (1999). The origin of coarticulation. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Newlett, N., eds., Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–30.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary?. Cognition, 50(1–3), 239–269.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.Google Scholar

Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A., eds., Speech Production and Speech Modelling. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 402–39.Google Scholar

Löfqvist, A. (1999). Interarticulator phasing, locus equations, and degree of coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(4), 2022–30.Google Scholar

Lotto, A. J. & Kluender, K. R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(4), 602–19.Google Scholar

Malécot, A. (1956). Acoustic cues for nasal consonants. Language, 32, 274–84.Google Scholar

Mattingly, I. G. (1981). Phonetic representation and speech synthesis by rule. In Myers, T., Laver, J. & Anderson, J., eds., The Cognitive Representation of Speech. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 415–20.Google Scholar

Menzerath, P. & de Lacerda, A. (1933). Koartikulation, Steuerung und Lautabgrenzung. Berlin u. Bonn: Fred. Dümmlers.Google Scholar

Moll, K. L. & Daniloff, R. G. (1971). Investigation of the timing of velar movements during speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 50(2B), 678–84.Google Scholar

Mooshammer, C. & Fuchs, S. (2002). Stress distinction in German: Simulating kinematic parameters of tongue-tip gestures. Journal of Phonetics, 30(3), 337–55.Google Scholar