Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Abercrombie, D. (1976). Stress and some other terms. Work in Progress, 9, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University, 51–3.Google Scholar

Allen, G. D. (1972). The location of rhythmic stress beats in English: An experimental study II. Language and Speech, 15(2), 179–95.Google Scholar

Arvaniti, A. (2009). Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 46–63.Google Scholar

Arvaniti, A. (2012). The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 351–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Athanasopoulou, A. & Vogel, I. (2014). Compounds in Modern Greek. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 22(1).Google Scholar

Auer, P. & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1994). Rhythmus und tempo in konversationeller Alltagssprache. In Schlieben-Lange, B., ed. Rhythmus, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 24(96), 78–106.Google Scholar

Auer, P., Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Müller, F. (1999). Language in Time: The Rhythm and Tempo of Spoken Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bååth, R. (2012). A new look at subjective rhythmisation. In Perspectives on Rhythm and Timing (PoRT): Book of Abstracts. University of Glasgow. www.sumsar.net/papers/rasmus_baath_PoRT_abstract.pdf.Google Scholar

Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beňuš, Š., Gravano, A. & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Pragmatic aspects of temporal accommodation in turn-taking. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 3001–27.Google Scholar

Bertinetto, P. M. (1989). Reflections on the dichotomy ‘stress’ vs. ’syllable-timing’. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 1989, 99–130Google Scholar

Bertinetto, P. M. & Bertini, C. (2010). Towards a unified predictive model of natural language rhythm. In Russo, M., ed., Prosodic Universals. Comparative Studies in Rhythmic Modeling and Rhythm Typology. Rome: Aracne, pp. 43–78.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1955). Intersections of stress and intonation. WORD, 11(2), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1981). Two Kinds of Vowels, Two Kinds of Rhythm. Bloomington, IN: The Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and Its Parts: Melody in Spoken English, Palo Alto. CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bunta, F. & Ingram, D. (2007). The acquisition of speech rhythm by bilingual Spanish- and English-speaking 4- and 5-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 999–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, N. & Beckman, M. (1997). Stress, prominence, and spectral tilt. In Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications. Proceedings of an ESCA Workshop. www.isca-speech.org/archive_open/int_97/inta_067.html.Google Scholar

Cauldwell, R. (2002). The functional irrhythmicality of spontaneous speech: A discourse view of speech rhythms. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 2(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Li, C., ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25–55.Google Scholar

Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2), 239–97.Google Scholar

Clark, J., Yallop, C. & Fletcher, J. (2007). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Classe, A. (1939/1978). The Rhythm of English Prose. London: Norwood Editions.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1991). A rhythm-based metric for turn-taking. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1, 275–8.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English Speech Rhythm: Form and Function in Everyday Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014). Prosody as dialogic interaction. In Barth-Weingarten, D. & Szczepek Reed, B., eds., Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion – Prosody and Phonetics in Interaction. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, pp. 229–59.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Auer, P. (1991). On the contextualizing function of speech rhythm in conversation: Question–answer sequences. In Verschueren, J., ed., Levels of Linguistic Adaptation: Selected Papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, 1987. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Cowley, S. (1994). Conversational functions of rhythmical patterning. Language and Communication, 14(4), 353–76.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. (1993). The de-accenting and re-accenting of repeated lexical items. In ESCA Workshop on Prosody. www.isca-speech.org/archive_open/archive_papers/prosody_93/pro3_016.pdf.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cummins, F. (2002). Speech rhythm and rhythmic taxonomy. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002. www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2002/sp02_121.html.Google Scholar

Cummins, F. (2009). Rhythm as an affordance for the entrainment of movement. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 15–28.Google Scholar

Cummins, F. & Port, R. (1998). Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English. Journal of Phonetics, 26(2), 145–71.Google Scholar

Cutler, A. & Clifton, C. E. (1984). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. G., eds., Attention and Performance X. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 183–96.Google Scholar

D’Ausilio, A., Bartoli, E. & Maffongelli, L. (2015). Grasping synergies: A motor-control approach to the mirror neuron mechanism. Physics of Life Reviews, 12(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51–62.Google Scholar

Dauer, R. M. (1987). Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 447–50.Google Scholar

de Jong, K. J. (1995). The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(1), 491–504.Google Scholar

Dell, F. (1984). L’accentuation dans les phrases en français. In Dell, F., Hirst, D. J. & Vergnaud, J. R., eds., Forme Sonore Du Langage. Paris: Herman, pp. 65–122.Google Scholar

Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for∆C. In Karnowski, P. & Szigeti, I., eds., Language and Language-Processing. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 231–41.Google Scholar

Deterding, D. (2001). The measurement of rhythm: A comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 217–30.Google Scholar

Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M., eds. (2013). WALS Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar

Echols, C. H., Crowhurst, M. J. & Childers, J. B. (1997). The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(2), 202–25.Google Scholar

Efron, D. (1941). Gesture and Environment: A Tentative Study of Some of the Spatio-temporal and Linguistic Aspects of the Gestural Behavior of Eastern Jews and Southern Italians in New York City, Living Under Similar as Well as Different Environmental Conditions. Columbia, NY: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1999). Emotional and conversational nonverbal signals. In Messing, L. S. & Campbell, R., eds., Gesture, Speech, and Sign. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–50.Google Scholar

Erickson, F. (1992). They know all the lines: Rhythmic organization and contextualization in a conversational listing routine. In Auer, P. & di Luzio, A., eds., The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 365–97.Google Scholar

Eriksson, A. & Heldner, M. (2015). The acoustics of word stress in English as a function of stress level and speaking style. In 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2015). Dresden, pp. 41–5.Google Scholar

Féry, C. (2016). Intonation and Prosodic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Féry, C. & Krifka, M. (2008). Information structure: Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In van Sterkenburg, P., ed., Unity and Diversity of Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 123–35.Google Scholar

Fletcher, J. (2010). The prosody of speech: Timing and rhythm. In Hardcastle, W. J., Laver, J. & Gibbon, F. E., eds., The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences. London: Blackwell, pp. 521–602.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A. (1979). ‘Perceptual centers’ in speech production and perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 25(5), 375–88.Google Scholar

Fox, A. (2000). Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fraisse, P. (1963). The Psychology of Time. Translated by Jennifer Leith, New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar

Fraisse, P. (1978). Time and rhythm perception. In Carterette, E. C. & Friedman, M. P., eds., Perceptual Coding. New York: Academic Press, pp. 203–54.Google Scholar

Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 765–8.Google Scholar

Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1(2), 126–52.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. (2011). Stress: Phonotactic and phonetic evidence. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E. V. & Rice, K., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 2. London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 924–48.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. (2014). Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, M. & Roettger, T. (2017). Acoustic correlates of word stress: A cross-linguistic survey. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1), 404.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. & van der Hulst, H. (in press). Word stress system. In Gussenhoven, C. & Chen, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goedemans, R. W., Heinz, J. & van der Hulst, H. (2015). StressTyp2, version 1. http://st2.ullet.net.Google Scholar

Grabe, E. & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 515–46.Google Scholar

Graham, C. (1978). Jazz Chants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grahn, J. A. (2012). Neural mechanisms of rhythm perception: current findings and future perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 585–606.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, C. (1984). On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1987). An Essay on Stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Harlig, J. & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1988). Accentuation typology, word order and theme-rheme structure. In Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E. A. & Wirth, J., eds., Studies in Syntactic Typology, Vol. 17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 125–46.Google Scholar

Hayes, B. (1984). The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(1), 33–74.Google Scholar

Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253–306.Google Scholar

Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heinz, J., Goedemans, R. & van der Hulst, H. (2016). Dimensions of Phonological Stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hickok, G., Farahbod, H. & Saberi, K. (2015). The rhythm of perception: Entrainment to acoustic rhythms induces subsequent perceptual oscillation. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1006–13.Google Scholar

Hirst, D. & Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hyman, L. M. (2006). Word-prosodic typology. Phonology, 23(2), 225–57.Google Scholar

Hyman, L. M. (2014). Do all languages have word accent? In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–82.Google Scholar

Inkelas, S. (2011). The interaction between morphology and phonology. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J. & Yu, A. C. L., eds., The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 68–102.Google Scholar

James, A. L. (1940). Speech Signals in Telephony. London: Sir Pitman & Sons Limited.Google Scholar

Jassem, W. & Gibbon, D. (1980). Re-defining English accent and stress. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 10(1–2), 2–16.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tagpositioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47–96.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In D’Urso, V. & Leonardi, P., eds., Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric. Padua: Cleup Editore, pp. 11–38.Google Scholar

Jones, D. (1967). The Phoneme: Its Nature and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kager, R. (2007). Feet and metrical stress. In de Lacy, P., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–227.Google Scholar

Kingdon, R. (1958). The Groundword of English Stress. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981, 3–91.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. R. (1978). The Structure of Intonational Meaning, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P., Draper, M. H. & Whitteridge, D. (1958). Syllables and stress. Le Maître Phonétique, 36(73), 1–14.Google Scholar

Langus, A., Mehler, J. & Nespor, M. (2017). Rhythm in language acquisition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Pt B), 158–66.Google Scholar

Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lehiste, I. (1973). Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(5), 1228–34.Google Scholar

Lehiste, I. (1977). Isochrony reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics, 5(3), 253–63.Google Scholar

Leonard, T. & Cummins, F. (2011). The temporal relation between beat gestures and speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1457–71.Google Scholar

Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.Google Scholar

Lieberman, P. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(4), 451–4.Google Scholar

Loehr, D. (2007). Aspects of rhythm in gesture and speech. Gesture, 7(2), 179–214.Google Scholar

Loukina, A., Kochanski, G., Rosner, B., Keane, E. & Shih, C. (2011). Rhythm measures and dimensions of durational variation in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(5), 3258–70.Google Scholar

McClave, E. (1994). Gestural beats: The rhythm hypothesis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23(1), 45–66.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mohanan, K. P. (2012). The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

Morton, J. & Jassem, W. (1965). Acoustic correlates of stress. Language and Speech, 8(3), 159–81.Google Scholar

Morton, J., Marcus, S. & Frankish, C. (1976). Perceptual centers (P-centers). Psychological Review, 83(5), 405–8.Google Scholar

Mukai, M. (2006). A Comparative Study of Compound Words in English, Japanese and Mainland Scandinavian. PhD thesis Newcastle University. Retrieved from https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/dspace/handle/10443/243.Google Scholar

Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J. & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 756–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nespor, M. (1990). On the rhythm parameter in phonology. In Roca, I., ed., The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 157–75.Google Scholar

Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (1989). On clashes and lapses. Phonology, 6(1), 69–116.Google Scholar

Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (2007). Prosodic Phonology: With a New Foreword. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Newman, S. S. (1946). On the stress system of English. WORD, 2(3), 171–87.Google Scholar

Nolan, F. & Asu, E. L. (2009). The Pairwise Variability Index and coexisting rhythms in language. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 64–77.Google Scholar

Nolan, F. & Jeon, H. S. (2014). Speech rhythm: A metaphor? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130396.Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of Colloquial English: A Practical Handbook. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Ogden, R. & Hawkins, S. (2015). Entrainment as a basis for co-ordinated actions in speech. In Proceedings of International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. University of Glasgow. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/88780/.Google Scholar

Ordin, M. & Polyanskaya, L. (2014). Development of timing patterns in first and second languages. System, 42, 244–57.Google Scholar

Ortiz Lira, H. (1998). Word Stress and Sentence Accent. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de La Educación.Google Scholar

Palmer, H. E. (1924). English Intonation with Systematic Exercises. London: W. Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar

Payne, E., Post, B., Astruc, L., Prieto, P. & Vanrell, M. del M. (2012). Measuring child rhythm. Language and Speech, 55(Pt 2), 203–29.Google Scholar

Pike, K. L. (1945). The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Publications.Google Scholar

Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–225.Google Scholar

Port, R. F., Dalby, J. & O’Dell, M. (1987). Evidence for mora timing in Japanese.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(5), 1574–85.Google Scholar

Poser, W. J. (1984). The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/15169/14709025-MIT.pdf?sequence=2.Google Scholar

Prince, A. (1989). Metrical forms. In Kiparsky, P. & Youmans, G., eds., Rhythm and Meter. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 45–80.Google Scholar

Ramus, F., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73(3), 265–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ramus, F., Dupoux, E. & Mehler, J. (2003). The psychological reality of rhythm classes: Perceptual studies. Cogprints. http://cogprints.org/3079/.Google Scholar

Roach, P. (1982). On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. In Crystal, D., ed., Linguistic Controversies, London: Edward Arnold, pp. 73–9.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In Atkinson, J. H. J., ed., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 266–95.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41(3/4), 235–63.Google Scholar

Schmerling, S. F. (1976). Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Scott, S. K. (1998). The point of P-centres. Psychological Research, 6, 1–4.Google Scholar

Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Selkirk, E. (2011). The syntax–phonology interface. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J. & Yu, A. C. L., eds., The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 435–83.Google Scholar

Sluijter, A. (1995). Phonetic Correlates of Stress and Accent. PhD thesis, Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10022502005/.Google Scholar

Sluijter, A. M. & van Heuven, V. J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(4 Pt 1), 2471–85.Google Scholar

Stetson, R. H. (1928). Motor Phonetics: A Study of Speech Movements in Action, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Szczepek Reed, B. (2006). Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Szczepek Reed, B. (2009). Prosodic orientation: A practice for sequence organization in broadcast telephone openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1223–47.Google Scholar

Szczepek Reed, B. (2010). Speech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-cultural talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1037–59.Google Scholar

Szczepek Reed, B. (2011). Analysing Conversation: An Introduction to Prosody, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Szczepek Reed, B. (2012a). Beyond the particular: Prosody and the coordination of actions. Language and Speech, 55(1), 12–33.Google Scholar

Szczepek Reed, B. (2012b). A conversation analytic perspective on teaching English pronunciation: The case of speech rhythm. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 67–87.Google Scholar

Teschner, R. V. & Whitley, M. S. (2004). Pronouncing English: A Stress-Based Approach. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Thaut, M. H., Trimarchi, P. D. & Parsons, L. M. (2014). Human brain basis of musical rhythm perception: common and distinct neural substrates for meter, tempo, and pattern. Brain Sciences, 4(2), 428–52.Google Scholar

Tilsen, S. & Arvaniti, A. (2013). Speech rhythm analysis with decomposition of the amplitude envelope: characterizing rhythmic patterns within and across languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(1), 628–39.Google Scholar

Trager, G. L. & Smith, H. L. (1951). An Outline of English Structure. Oklahoma, OK: Battenberg Press.Google Scholar

Trouvain, J. & Gut, U., eds. (2007). Non-Native Prosody: Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Van der Hulst, H. (2014a). Representing rhythm. In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–65.Google Scholar

Van der Hulst, H. (2014b). The study of word accent and stress: past, present, and future. In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–55.Google Scholar

Vaughan-Rees, M. (2010). Rhymes and Rhythm: A Poem-based Course for English Pronunciation. Reading: Garnet Education.Google Scholar

Vos, P. G., Mates, J. & van Kruysbergen, N. W. (1995). The perceptual centre of a stimulus as the cue for synchronization to a metronome: Evidence from asynchronies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 48(4), 1024–40.Google Scholar

White, L. & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), 501–22.Google Scholar

Wiget, L., White, L., Schuppler, B., Grenon, I., Rauch, O. & Mattys, S. L. (2010). How stable are acoustic metrics of contrastive speech rhythm? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3), 1559–69.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. & Wilson, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 957–68.Google Scholar

Woodrow, H. (1951). Time perception. In Stevens, S. S., ed., Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 1224–36.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, T. P. & West, D. H. (1986). The structure of silence between turns in two-party conversation. Discourse Processes, 9, 375–90.Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M. L. & Vergnaud, J. R. (2006). Phrasal stress and syntax. In Everaert, M. & Riemsdijk, H. van, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 522–68.Google Scholar

Abberton, E. R. M. & Fourcin, A. J. (1997). Electrolaryngography. In Ball, M. J. & Code, C., eds., Instrumental Clinical Phonetics. London: Whurr, pp. 119–48.Google Scholar

Abramson, A. S., Luangthongkum, T. & Nye, P. W. (2004). Voice register in Suai (Kuai): An analysis of perceptual and acoustic data. Phonetica, 61, 147–71.Google Scholar

Alzaidi, M. S., Xu, Y. & Xu, A. (2019). Prosodic encoding of focus in Hijazi Arabic. Speech Communication, 106, 127–49.Google Scholar

Arantes, P. (2015). Time-normalization of fundamental frequency contours: A hands-on tutorial. In Meireles, A. R., ed., Courses on Speech Prosody. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 98–123.Google Scholar

Archangeli, D. B., Yip, J. C.-K., Qin, L. & Lee, A. (2017). Phonological and phonetic properties of nasal substitution in Sasak and Javanese. Laboratory Phonology, 8(21), 1–27.Google Scholar

Bates, D. M., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.Google Scholar

Bauer, R. S., Cheung, K. H. & Cheung, P. M. (2003). Variation and merger of the rising tones in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 15(2), 211–25.Google Scholar

Bidelman, G. M. & Krishnan, A. (2010). Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians. Brain Research, 1335, 112–25.Google Scholar

Bidelman, G. M., Gandour, J. T. & Krishnan, A. (2011). Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch. Brain and Cognition, 77, 1–10.Google Scholar

Brunelle, M. (2009). Tone perception in Northern and Southern Vietnamese. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 79–96.Google Scholar

Brunelle, M. & Kirby, J. P. (2016). Tone and phonation in Southeast Asian languages. Linguistics and Language Compass, 10(4), 191–207.Google Scholar

Brunelle, M., Nguyễn, D. D. & Nguyễn, K. H. (2010). A laryngographic and laryngoscopic study of Northern Vietnamese tones. Phonetica, 67(3), 147–69.Google Scholar

Cao, J. & Maddieson, I. (1992). An exploration of phonation types in Wu dialects of Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 77–92.Google Scholar

Chao, Y.-R. (1980). A system of tone letters. Fangyan [方言], (2), 81–3.Google Scholar

Chen, M. Y. (2000). Tone Sandhi: Patterns across Chinese Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chen, S., Wiltshire, C. R. & Li, B. (2017a). Statistical modeling of Mandarin tone sandhi: Neutralization of underlying pitch targets. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(5), 1119–24.Google Scholar

Chen, S., Zhang, C., McCollum, A. G. & Wayland, R. P. (2017b). Statistical modelling of phonetic and phonologised perturbation effects in tonal and non-tonal languages. Speech Communication, 88, 17–38.Google Scholar

Chen, Y. & Xu, Y. (2006). Production of weak elements in speech: Evidence from f₀ patterns of neutral tone in Standard Chinese. Phonetica, 63(1), 47–75.Google Scholar

Cheng, C., Xu, Y. & Gubian, M. (2010). Exploring the mechanism of tonal contraction in Taiwan Mandarin. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2010, Makuhari, Japan, pp. 2010–13.Google Scholar

Cheng, C., Chen, J.-Y. & Gubian, M. (2013). Are Mandarin sandhi Tone 3 and Tone 2 the same or different? The results of Functional Data Analysis. In Proceedings of the 27th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC-27), Taipei, pp. 296–301.Google Scholar

Collier, R. (1975). Physiological correlates of intonation patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58(1), 249–56.Google Scholar

Colton, R. H. & Conture, E. G. (1990). Problems and pitfalls of electroglottography. Journal of Voice, 4(1), 10–24.Google Scholar

Connell, B. (2002). Tone languages and the universality of intrinsic f₀: Evidence from Africa. Journal of Phonetics, 30(1), 101–29.Google Scholar

Connell, B. (2011). Downstep. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E. & Rice, K. D., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 824–47.Google Scholar

Connell, B. & Ladd, D. R. (1990). Aspects of pitch realisation in Yoruba. Phonology, 7(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Cooper, A. & Wang, Y. (2013). Effects of tone training on Cantonese tone-word learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(2), EL133–EL139.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 6th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K. & Losardo, D. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(2), 121–36.Google Scholar

Davidson, L. S. (2006). Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(1), 407–15.Google Scholar

Deutsch, D., Henthorn, T., Marvin, E. & Xu, H. (2006). Absolute pitch among American and Chinese conservatory students: Prevalence differences, and evidence for a speech-related critical period. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(2), 719–22.Google Scholar

Diehl, R. L. & Kluender, K. R. (1989). On the objects of speech perception. Ecological Psychology, 1(2), 121–44.Google Scholar

Docherty, G. J., González Ochoa, S. D. & Mitchell, N. (2015).Static vs. dynamic perspectives on the realization of vowel nuclei in West Australian English. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015), Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar

Esposito, C. M. (2012). An acoustic and electroglottographic study of White Hmong tone and phonation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 466–76.Google Scholar

Faaborg-Andersen, K. & Buchthal, F. (1956). Action potentials from internal laryngeal muscles during phonation. Nature, 177, 340–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Franich, K. (2015). The effect of cognitive load on tonal coarticulation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015), Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar

Fujisaki, H. & Hirose, K. (1984). Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours for declarative sentences of Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan [日本音響学会誌], 5(4), 233–42.Google Scholar

Fujisaki, H., Wang, C., Ohno, S. & Gu, W. (2005). Analysis and synthesis of fundamental frequency contours of Standard Chinese using the Command-Response Model. Speech Communication, 47(1–2), 59–70.Google Scholar

Gandour, J. T. (1977). On the interaction between tone and vowel length: Evidence from Thai dialects. Phonetica, 34, 54–65.Google Scholar

Gandour, J. T., Potisuk, S. & Dechongkit, S. (1994). Tonal coarticulation in Thai. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 477–92.Google Scholar

Gick, B. W. (2002). The use of ultrasound for linguistic phonetic fieldwork. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 32(2), 113–21.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. K. & Ladefoged, P. N. (2001). Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 383–406.Google Scholar

Gu, C. (2014). Smoothing spline ANOVA models: R package gss. Journal of Statistical Software, 58(5), 1–25.Google Scholar

Gu, W. & Lee, T. (2009). Effects of tone and emphatic focus on f₀ contours of Cantonese speech: A comparison with Standard Chinese. Chinese Journal of Phonetics, 2, 133–47.Google Scholar

Gu, W., Hirose, K. & Fujisaki, H. (2007). Analysis of tones in Cantonese speech based on the Command-Response Model. Phonetica, 64(1), 29–62.Google Scholar

Gubian, M., Torreira, F. & Boves, L. (2015). Using Functional Data Analysis for investigating multidimensional dynamic phonetic contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 16–40.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, C. H. M. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hallé, P. A. (1994). Evidence for tone-specific activity of the sternohyoid muscle in Modern Standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 37(2), 103–24.Google Scholar

’t Hart, J., Collier, R. & Cohen, A. (1990). A Perceptual Study of Intonation: An Experimental-Phonetic Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Herbst, C. T. & Ternström, S. (2006). A comparison of different methods to measure the EGG contact quotient. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 31, 126–38.Google Scholar

Herman, R., Beckman, M. E. & Honda, K. (1996). Subglottal pressure and final lowering in English. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1996), Philadelphia, PA, pp. 145–8.Google Scholar

Hombert, J.-M. (1977a). Consonant types, vowel height and tone in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics, 8(2), 173–90.Google Scholar

Hombert, J.-M. (1977b). Development of tones from vowel height? Journal of Phonetics, 5, 9–16.Google Scholar

Honda, K. (1995). Laryngeal and extra-laryngeal mechanisms of f₀ control. In Bell-Berti, F. & Raphael, L. J., eds., Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues. New York: American Institute of Physics, pp. 215–32.Google Scholar

Honda, K., Hirai, H., Masaki, S. & Shimada, Y. (1999). Role of vertical larynx movement and cervical lordosis in f₀ control. Language and Speech, 42(4), 401–11.Google Scholar

Huckvale, M. A. (2016). Using web audio to deliver interactive speech tools in the browser. Phonetician, 111, 70–85.Google Scholar

Huckvale, M. A., Brookes, D. M., Dworkin, L. T., Johnson, M. E., Pearce, D. J. & Whitaker, L. (1987). The SPAR speech filing system. In European Conference on Speech Technology, Edinburgh, pp. 1305–8.Google Scholar

Hyman, L. M. & Schuh, R. G. (1974). Universals of tone rules: Evidence from West Africa. Linguistic Inquiry, 5(1), 81–115.Google Scholar

Kaisse, E. M. (2006). Sandhi. In Brown, K., ed., Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 740–1.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. P. (2011). Illustrations of the IPA: Vietnamese (Hanoi). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(3), 381–92.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. P. & Ladd, D. R. (2016a). Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel f₀: Evidence from ‘true voicing’ languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(4), 2400–11.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. P. & Ladd, D. R. (2016b). Tone–melody correspondence in Vietnamese popular song. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL 2016), Buffalo, NY, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

Kong, Q. (1987). Influence of tones upon vowel duration in Cantonese. Language and Speech, 30(4), 387–400.Google Scholar

Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3), 243–76.Google Scholar

Kuang, J. (2013). The tonal space of contrastive five level tones. Phonetica, 70(1–2), 1–23.Google Scholar

Kwon, K.-K. (2003). Prosodic change from tone to vowel length in Korean. In Fikkert, J. P. M. & Jacobs, H., eds., Development in Prosodic Systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 67–89.Google Scholar

Laniran, Y. O. (1992). Intonation in Tone Languages: The Phonetic Implementation of Tones in Yoruba. PhD thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Laniran, Y. O. & Clements, G. N. (2003). Downstep and high raising: Interacting factors in Yoruba tone production. Journal of Phonetics, 31(2), 203–50.Google Scholar

Laniran, Y. O. & Gerfen, C. (1997). High raising, downstep and downdrift in Igbo. Paper presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Law, S.-P., Fung, S. Y. R. & Kung, C. (2013). An ERP study of good production vis-à-vis poor perception of tones in Cantonese: Implications for top-down speech processing. PLOS ONE, 8(e54396), 1–9.Google Scholar

Lee-Kim, S.-I. (2014). Revisiting Mandarin ‘apical vowels’: An articulatory and acoustic study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 44(3), 261–82.Google Scholar

Lee, A. & Xu, Y. (2016). Effect of speech rate on pre-low raising in Cantonese. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL 2016), Buffalo, NY, pp. 75–9.Google Scholar

Lee, A., Prom-on, S. & Xu, Y. (2017). Pre-low raising in Japanese pitch accent. Phonetica, 74(4), 231–46.Google Scholar

Lee, Y.-C., Wang, T. & Liberman, M. Y. (2016). Production and perception of tone 3 focus in Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1058), 1–13.Google Scholar

Li, Y., Tao, J., Lai, W. & Xu, X. (2017). Quantitative intonation modeling of interrogative sentences for Mandarin speech synthesis. Speech Communication, 89, 92–102.Google Scholar

List, G. (1961). Speech melody and song melody in Central Thailand. Ethnomusicology, 5(1), 16–32.Google Scholar

Liu, F. (1925). Étude expérimentale sur les tons du chinois. Paris: Société d’édition Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Liu, F., Jiang, C., Thompson, W. F., Xu, Y., Yang, Y. & Stewart, L. (2012). The mechanism of speech processing in congenital amusia: Evidence from Mandarin speakers. PLOS ONE, 7(e30374), 1–11.Google Scholar

Liu, M., Chen, Y. & Schiller, N. O. (2016). Online processing of tone and intonation in Mandarin: Evidence from ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 91, 307–17.Google Scholar

Liu, S. & Samuel, A. G. (2004). Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when f₀ information is neutralized. Language and Speech, 47(2), 109–38.Google Scholar

Loucks, T. M. J., Poletto, C. J., Saxon, K. G. & Ludlow, C. L. (2005). Laryngeal muscle responses to mechanical displacement of the thyroid cartilage in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99, 922–30.Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. (2005). Tone. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie, B., eds., The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 58–61.Google Scholar

Miller, A. L. & Finch, K. B. (2011). Corrected high-frame rate anchored ultrasound with software alignment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 471–86.Google Scholar

Mirman, D. (2014). Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Moisik, S. R., Lin, H. & Esling, J. H. (2014). A study of laryngeal gestures in Mandarin citation tones using simultaneous laryngoscopy and laryngeal ultrasound (SLLUS). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 44(1), 21–58.Google Scholar

Mok, P. K. P. & Zuo, D. (2012). The separation between music and speech: Evidence from the perception of Cantonese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(4), 2711–20.Google Scholar

Mok, P. K. P., Zuo, D. & Wong, W. Y. P. (2013). Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 25(3), 341–70.Google Scholar

Myers, J. T. & Tsay, J. S.-C. (2008). Neutralization in Taiwan Southern Min tone sandhi. In Hsiao, Y. E., Hsu, H.-C., Wee, L.-H. & Ho, D.-A., eds., Interfaces in Chinese Phonology: Festschrift in Honor of Matthew Y. Chen on his 70th birthday [漢語音韻介面：陳淵泉先生七秩壽慶論文集]. Taipei: Academia Sinica, p. 2411.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. (1978). Production of tone. In Fromkin, V. A., ed., Tone: A Linguistic Survey. New York: Academic Press, pp. 5–39.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. & Eukel, B. (1987). Explaining the intrinsic pitch of vowels. In Channon, R. & Shockey, L., eds., In Honor of Ilse Lehiste, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 207–15.Google Scholar

Ohde, R. N. (1984). Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(1), 224–30.Google Scholar

Payne, J. K., Higenbottam, T. W. & Guindi, G. M. (1980). A surface electrode for laryngeal electromyography. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 43, 853–4.Google Scholar

Peng, S.-H. (2000). Lexical versus ‘phonological’ representations of Mandarin sandhi tones. In Broe, M. B. & Pierrehumbert, J. B., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–67.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The Finnish possessive suffixes. Language, 56(3), 603–21.Google Scholar

Pike, K. L. (1948). Tone Languages. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Prom-on, S., Xu, Y. & Thipakorn, B. (2009). Modeling tone and intonation in Mandarin and English as a process of target approximation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(1), 405–24.Google Scholar

Prom-on, S., Liu, F. & Xu, Y. (2012). Post-low bouncing in Mandarin Chinese: Acoustic analysis and computational modeling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(1), 421–32.Google Scholar

Prom-on, S., Xu, Y., Gu, W., Arvaniti, A., Nam, H. & Whalen, D. H. (2016). The Common Prosody Platform (CPP): Where theories of prosody can be directly compared. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Speech Prosody (SP2016), Boston, MA, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar

Ramsay, J. O. & Silverman, B. W. (2005). Functional Data Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Rialland, A. (1981). Le système tonal du gurma (langue gur de Haute-Volta). Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 3, 39–64.Google Scholar

Rialland, A. (2009). The African lax question prosody: Its realisation and geographical distribution. Lingua, 119(6), 928–49.Google Scholar

Sagart, L., Hallé, P. A., de Boysson-Bardies, B. & Arabia-Guidet, C. (1986). Tone production in Modern Standard Chinese: An electromyographic investigation. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale, 15(2), 205–21.Google Scholar

Saitou, T., Unoki, M. & Akagi, M. (2005). Development of an f₀ control model based on f₀ dynamic characteristics for singing-voice synthesis. Speech Communication, 46(3–4), 405–17.Google Scholar

Sapir, S. (1989). The intrinsic pitch of vowels: Theoretical, physiological, and clinical considerations. Journal of Voice, 3(1), 44–51.Google Scholar

Schellenberg, M. H. (2009). Singing in a tone language: Shona. In Ojo, A. & Moshi, L., eds., Selected Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: Linguistic Research and Languages in Africa, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 137–44.Google Scholar

Schellenberg, M. H. (2012). Does language determine music in tone languages? Ethnomusicology, 56(2), 266–78.Google Scholar

Shadle, C. H. (1985). Intrinsic fundamental frequency of vowels in sentence context. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78(5), 1562–7.Google Scholar

Silverman, D. D., Blankenship, B., Kirk, P. & Ladefoged, P. N. (1995). Phonetic structures in Jalapa Mazatec. Anthropological Linguistics, 37(1), 70–88.Google Scholar

Snider, K. L. (1998). Phonetic realisation of downstep in Bimoba. Phonology, 15, 77–101.Google Scholar

Srisuwan, N., Phukpattaranont, P. & Limsakul, C. (2012). Feature selection for Thai tone classification based on surface EMG. Procedia Engineering, 32, 253–9.Google Scholar

Steele, S. A. (1986). Interaction of vowel f₀ and prosody. Phonetica, 43, 92–105.Google Scholar

Stepp, C. E. (2012). Surface electromyography for speech and swallowing systems: Measurement, analysis, and interpretation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1232–47.Google Scholar

Talkin, D. (1995). A robust algorithm for pitch tracking (RAPT). In W. B. Kleijn and K. K. Paliwal, eds., Speech Coding and Synthesis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 495–518.Google Scholar

Titze, I. R., Baken, R. J., Bozeman, K. W., et al. (2015). Toward a consensus on symbolic notation of harmonics, resonances, and formants in vocalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(5), 3005–7.Google Scholar

Tsanas, A., Zañartu, M., Little, M. A., Fox, C., Ramig, L. O. & Clifford, G. D. (2014). Robust fundamental frequency estimation in sustained vowels: Detailed algorithmic comparisons and information fusion with adaptive Kalman filtering. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(5), 2885–901.Google Scholar

Ullah, S. & Finch, C. F. (2013). Applications of functional data analysis: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(43), 1–12.Google Scholar

Vieira, M. N. (2015). Electroglottography. In Meireles, A. R., ed., Courses on Speech Prosody. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 52–97.Google Scholar

Whalen, D. H. & Levitt, A. G. (1995). The universality of intrinsic f₀ of vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 349–66.Google Scholar

Wong, P. C. M. & Diehl, R. L. (2002). How can the lyrics of a song in a tone language be understood. Psychology of Music, 30, 202–9.Google Scholar

Wong, P. C. M. & Diehl, R. L. (2003). Inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 413–22.Google Scholar

Wong, W. Y. P., Chan, M. K. M. & Beckman, M. E. (2005). An Autosegmental-Metrical analysis and prosodic annotation conventions for Cantonese. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Vol. C, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 271–300.Google Scholar

Wu, W.-L. (2013). Cantonese Prosody: Sentence-Final Particles and Prosodic Focus. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar

Xu, C. X. & Xu, Y. (2003). Effects of consonant aspiration on Mandarin tones. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33(2), 165–81.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (1993). Contextual Tonal Variations in Mandarin. PhD thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (1997). Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 25(1), 61–83.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (1999). Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f₀ contours. Journal of Phonetics, 27(1), 55–105.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (2005). Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication, 46(3–4), 220–51.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (2013). ProsodyPro: A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013), Aix-en-Provence, France, pp. 7–10.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. & Sun, X. (2002). Maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(3), 1399–413.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. & Wang, Q. E. (2001). Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication, 33(4), 319–37.Google Scholar

Xu, Y., Chen, S.-W. & Wang, B. (2012). Prosodic focus with and without post-focus compression: A typological divide within the same language family? Linguistic Review, 29(1), 131–47.Google Scholar

Yip, M. J. W. (2002). Tone. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yu, K. M. & Lam, H. W. (2014). The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(3), 1320–33.Google Scholar

Yu, S., Lee, T. & Ng, M. L. (2016). Surface electromyographic activity of extrinsic laryngeal muscles in Cantonese tone production. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 82(2), 287–94.Google Scholar

Yung, B. (1983). Creative process in Cantonese opera I: The role of linguistic tones. Ethnomusicology, 27(1), 29–47.Google Scholar

Zhang, J. (2004). The role of contrast-specific and language-specific phonetics in contour tone distribution. In Hayes, B. P., Kirchner, R. M. & Steriade, D., eds., Phonetically Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–90.Google Scholar

Zhu, X. & Wang, C. (2015). Tone. In Wang, W. S.-Y. & Sun, C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 503–15.Google Scholar

Arvaniti, A. (2016). Analytical decisions in intonation research and the role of representations: Lessons from Romani. Laboratory Phonology, 7(1), 6.Google Scholar

Arvaniti, A., Ladd, D. R. & Mennen, I. (1998). Stability of tonal alignment: The case of Greek prenuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 3–25.Google Scholar

Astruc, L., Prieto, P., Payne, E., Post, B. & Vanrell, M. d. M. (2009). Acquisition of tonal targets in Catalan, Spanish, and English. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 5, 1–14.Google Scholar

Atterer, M. & Ladd, D. R. (2004). On the phonetics and phonology of ‘segmental anchoring’ of f₀: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 177–97.Google Scholar

Bänziger, T. & Scherer, K. (2005). The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication, 46, 252–67.Google Scholar

Beckman, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–310.Google Scholar

Beckman, M., Hirschberg, J. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–54.Google Scholar

Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [computer program]. Version 6.1.30, www.praat.org/.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1978). Intonation across languages. In Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A. & Moravcsik, E. A., eds., Universals of Human Language. Volume II: Phonology. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 471–524.Google Scholar

Breen, M., Fedorenko, E., Wagner, M. & Gibson, E. (2010). Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 1044–98.Google Scholar

Bruce, G. (1977). Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar

Bruce, G. & Gårding, E. (1978). A prosodic typology for Swedish dialects. In Gårding, E., Bruce, G. & Bannert, R., eds., Nordic Prosody. Lund: Gleerup, pp. 219–28.Google Scholar

Brugos, A., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Veilleux, N. (2006). Transcribing Prosodic Structure of Spoken Utterances with ToBI. MIT Open Courseware. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-911-transcribing-prosodic-structure-of-spoken-utterances-with-tobi-january-iap-2006/.Google Scholar

Büring, D. (2009). Towards a typology of focus realization. In Féry, C. & Zimmermann, M., eds., Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 177–205.Google Scholar

Calhoun, S. (2007). Information Structure and the Prosodic Structure of English: a Probabilistic Relationship. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar

Calhoun, S. (2010). The centrality of metrical structure in signaling information structure: A probabilistic perspective. Language, 86(1), 1–42.Google Scholar

Calhoun, S. (2015). The interaction of prosody and syntax in Samoan focus marking. Lingua, 165(B), 205–29.Google Scholar

Calhoun, S. & Schweitzer, A. (2012). Can intonation contours be lexicalised? Implications for discourse meanings. In Elordieta, G. & Prieto, P., eds., Prosody and Meaning (Interface Explorations 25). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 271‒327.Google Scholar

Chen, Y. & Gussenhoven, C. (2008). Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 724–46.Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Lee, P. P.-L. & Pan, H. (2016). Topic and focus marking in Chinese. In Féry, C. & Ishihara, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clifton, C., Carlson, K. & Frazier, L. (2002). Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech, 45(2), 87–114.Google Scholar

Cole, J. (2015). Prosody in context: A review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(1–2), 1‒31.Google Scholar

Cole, J. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2016). New methods for prosodic transcription: Capturing variability as a source of information. Laboratory Phonology, 7(1).Google Scholar

Cole, J., Mo, Y. & Hasegawa-Johnson, M. (2010). Signal-based and expectation-based factors in the perception of prosodic prominence. Laboratory Phonology, 1(2), 425–52.Google Scholar

Cooper, W., Eady, S. & Mueller, P. (1985). Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question–answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 2142–56.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cruz, M., Swerts, M. & Frota, S. (2017). The role of intonation and visual cues in the perception of sentence types: Evidence from European Portuguese varieties. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 23.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cutler, A. (1990). Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation. In Altmann, G. T. M., ed., Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 105–21.Google Scholar

D’Imperio, M., Nguyen, N. & Munhall, K. G. (2003). An articulatory hypothesis for the alignment of tonal targets in Italian. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J., eds., Proceedings of 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Rundle Mall: Causal Productions, pp. 253–6.Google Scholar

D’Imperio, M., Cangemi, F. & Grice, M. (2016). Introducing advancing prosodic transcription. Laboratory Phonology, 7(1), 4.Google Scholar

Dalton, M. & Ní Chasaide, A. (2005). Tonal alignment in Irish dialects. Language and Speech, 48, 441‒64.Google Scholar

Dominguez, M., Farrus, M. & Wanner, L. (2016). An automatic prosody tagger for spontaneous speech. In COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Osaka, Japan: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 377–86.Google Scholar

Downing, L. J. & Pompino-Marschall, B. (2013). The focus prosody of Chichewa and the Stress-Focus constraint: a response to Samek-Lodovici (2005). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 31(3), 647–81.Google Scholar

Eady, S. & Cooper, W. (1986). Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80(2), 402–15.Google Scholar

Eady, S., Cooper, W., Klouda, G., Mueller, P. & Lotts, D. (1986). Acoustical characteristics of sentential focus: Narrow vs. broad and single vs. dual focus environments. Language and Speech, 29, 233–51.Google Scholar

Elfner, E. (2012). Syntax–Prosody Interactions in Irish. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA.Google Scholar

Féry, C. (2013). Focus as prosodic alignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(3), 683–734.Google Scholar

Féry, C. & Schubö, F. (2010). Hierarchical prosodic structures in the intonation of center-embedded relative clauses. The Linguistic Review, 27, 289–313.Google Scholar

Frota, S. (2002). Tonal association and target alignment in European Portuguese nuclear falls. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N., eds., Laboratory Phonology 7, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 387–418.Google Scholar

Fujisaki, H. (1983). Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. In MacNeilage, P. F., ed., The Production of Speech. New York: Springer, pp. 39–55.Google Scholar

Grabe, E. (1998). Pitch accent realization in English and German. Journal of Phonetics, 26(2), 129‒43.Google Scholar

Grice, M., Ladd, D. R. & Arvaniti, A. (2000). On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology. Phonology, 17, 143‒85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gussenhoven, C. (1984). On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, C. (2002). Intonation and interpretation: Phonetics and phonology. In Bel, B. & Marlien, I., eds., Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage, pp. 47‒57.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and Grammar in British English. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

Hanssen, J. (2017). Regional Variation in the Realisation of Intonation Contours in the Netherlands. Utrecht: LOT dissertations.Google Scholar

’t Hart, J., Collier, R. & Cohen, A. (1990). A Perceptual Study of Intonation: An Experimental-Phonetic Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hermes, D. J. (2006). Stylization of pitch contours. In Sudhoff, S., Lenertova, D., Meyer, R., Pappert, S., Augurzky, P., Mleinek, I., Richter, N. & Schließer, J., eds., Methods in Empirical Prosody Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 29–62.Google Scholar

Himmelmann, N. & Ladd, D. R. (2008). Prosodic description: An introduction for fieldworkers. Language Documentation & Conservation, 2(2), 244–74.Google Scholar

Hirschberg, J. & Ward, G. (1992). The influence of pitch range, duration, amplitude and spectral features on the interpretation of the rise-fall-rise intonation contour in English. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 241–51.Google Scholar

Hirst, D. J. (2005). Form and function in the representation of speech prosody. Speech Communication, 46(3–4), 334–47.Google Scholar

Hirst, D. J. & Di Cristo, A. (1998). A survey of intonation systems. In Hirst, D. J. & Di Cristo, A., eds., Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar

Hualde, J. I. (1999). Basque accentuation. In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 947–93.Google Scholar

Hualde, J. I. & Prieto, P. (2016). Towards an International Phonetic Alphabet (IPrA). Laboratory Phonology, 7(1), 5.Google Scholar

Ipek, C. (2015). The Phonology and Phonetics of Turkish Intonation. PhD thesis, University of Southern California, USA.Google Scholar

Ito, K., Turnbull, R. & Speer, S. (2017). Allophonic tunes of contrast: Lab and spontaneous speech lead to equivalent fixation responses in museum visitors. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 6.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jespersen, A. (2016). A first look at declarative rises as markers of ethnicity in Sydney. In Barnes, J., Brugos, A., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Vieilleux, N., eds., Speech Prosody 2016. Boston, MA, pp. 143–7.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A. (1998). The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15, 189–226.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A. (2005a). Korean intonational phonology and prosodic transcription. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–29.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A., ed. (2005b). Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A. (2014a). Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody and macro-rhythm. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 520–40.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A., ed. (2014b). Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jun, S.-A. & Kim, H.-S. (2007). VP focus and narrow focus in Korean. In Trouvain, J. & Barry, W. J., eds., Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, pp. 1277–80.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A. & Lee, H.-J. (1998). Phonetic and phonological markers of corrective focus in Korean. In Mannell, R. H. & Robert-Ribes, J., eds., Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP-98). Sydney: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association, pp. 1295–8.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A. & Prieto, P. (2018). Usages and advantages of categorical phonetic transcription of prosody: Toward the development of an IPrA (International Prosodic Alphabet). In Speech Prosody 2018, Poznań, Poland. https://linguistics.ucla.edu/ipra_workshop/.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A., Hualde, J. & Prieto, P. (2015). Workshop on Developing an International Prosodic Alphabet (IPrA) within the AM framework., International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. https://linguistics.ucla.edu/ipra_workshop/.Google Scholar

Kakouros, S. & Räsänen, O. (2016). Perception of sentence stress in speech correlates with the temporal unpredictability of prosodic features. Cognitive Science, 40(7), 1739–74.Google Scholar

Kim, S., Broersma, M. & Cho, T. (2012). The use of prosodic cues in learning new words in an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 415–44.Google Scholar

Krivokapić, J., Tiede, M. K. & Tyrone, M. E. (2017). A kinematic study of prosodic structure in articulatory and manual gestures: Results from a novel method of data collection. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 3.Google Scholar

Kügler, F. & Calhoun, S. (2020). Prosodic encoding of information structure: a typological perspective. In Gussenhoven, C. & Chen, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 454–467.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational Phonology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liberman, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Aronoff, M. & Oerhle, R., eds., Language Sound Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 157–233.Google Scholar

Mattys, S., White, L. & Melhorn, J. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 477–500.Google Scholar

Mo, Y. (2010). Prosody Production and Perception with Conversational Speech. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/18560.Google Scholar

Möhler, G. & Conkie, A. (1998). Parametric modeling of intonation using vector quantization. In Proceedings of the 3rd ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, pp. 311–16.Google Scholar

Nenkova, A., Brenier, J., Kothari, A., Calhoun, S., Whitton, L., Beaver, D. & Jurafsky, D. (2007). To memorize or to predict: Prominence labelling in conversational speech. In Human Language Technologies: NAACL, Rochester, NY, pp. 9–16.Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F. (1961). The Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. (1983). Cross-language use of pitch: An ethological view. Phonetica, 40, 1‒18.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of f₀ in voice. Phonetica, 41, 1‒16.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic use of voice of pitch. In Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J. J., eds., Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–47.Google Scholar

Peng, S.-H., Chan, M. K. M., Tseng, C.-Y., Huang, T., Lee, O. J. & Beckman, M. E. (2005). Towards a Pan-Mandarin system for prosodic transcription. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD thesis, MIT, published by Indiana Linguistics Club, 1987.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. (2000). Tonal elements and their alignment. In Horne, M., ed., Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Studies Presented to Gösta Bruce. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 11‒36.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. (2016). Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J. & Pollack, M. E., eds., Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 271‒311.Google Scholar

Pike, K. L. (1945). The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational meaning. WIREs Cognitive Science, 6(4), 371–81.Google Scholar

Prieto, P., D’Imperio, M. & Gili Fivela, B. (2005). Pitch accent alignment in Romance: Primary and secondary associations with metrical structure. Language and Speech, 48, 359–96.Google Scholar

Queen, R. M. (2001). Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish–German bilingual children. Language in Society, 30(1), 55–80.Google Scholar

Reichel, U. D. & Salveste, N. (2015). Pitch elbow detection. In Wirsching, G., ed., Elektronische Sprachverarbeitung. Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation, 78, Dresden: TUDpress, pp. 143–9.Google Scholar

Rogerson-Revell, P. (2011). English Phonology and Pronunciation Teaching. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

Roy, J., Cole, J. & Mahrt, T. (2017). Individual differences and patterns of convergence in prosody perception. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 22.Google Scholar

Samek-Lodovici, V. (2005). Prosody–syntax interaction in the expression of focus. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 687–755.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, K., Walsh, M., Calhoun, S., Schütze, H., Möbius, B., Schweitzer, A. & Dogil, G. (2015). Exploring the relationship between intonation and the lexicon: Evidence for lexicalised storage of intonation. Speech Communication, 66, 65–81.Google Scholar

Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Selkirk, E. (2011). The syntax–phonology interface. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J. & Yu, A., eds., The Handbook of Phonological Theory. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd ed., pp. 435–84.Google Scholar

Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Turk, A. E. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 193–247.Google Scholar

Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P. et al. (1992). ToBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Banff, Canada, pp. 867‒70.Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Lin, P. M. S. (2017). Production of ambiguous idioms in English: A reading aloud study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1) 58–70.Google Scholar

Skopeteas, S., Fielder, I., Hellmuth, S., Schwarz, A., Fanselow, G., Féry, C. & Krifka, M. (2006). Questionnaire on Information Structure (QUIS): Reference Manual, Potsdam, Germany: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar

Speer, S. R., Warren, P. & Schafer, A. J. (2011). Situationally independent prosodic phrasing. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 39‒98.Google Scholar

Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and the syntax–phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649–89.Google Scholar

Syrdal, A. K., Hirschberg, J., McGory, J. & Beckman, M. (2001). Automatic ToBI prediction and alignment to speed manual labeling of prosody. Speech Communication, 33, 135–51.Google Scholar

Taylor, P. (2000). Analysis and synthesis of intonation using the Tilt model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1697–714.Google Scholar

Trager, G. & Smith, H. (1951). An Outline of English Structure. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar

Turk, A. (2011). The temporal implementation of prosodic structure. In Cohn, A., Fougeron, C. & Huffman, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–53.Google Scholar

Vroomen, J., Tuomainen, J. & de Gelder, B. (1998). The roles of word stress and vowel harmony in speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(2), 133–49.Google Scholar

Wagner, M. (2015). Phonological evidence in syntax. In Kiss, T. & Alexidou, A., eds., Syntax – Theory and Analysis: An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter, Vol. 2, pp. 1154–98.Google Scholar

Wagner, M. & Watson, D. G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 905–45.Google Scholar

Wakefield, J. C. (2010). The English Equivalents of Cantonese Sentence-Final Particles: A Contrastive Analysis. PhD thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Wakefield, J. C. (2012). A floating tone discourse morpheme: The English equivalent of Cantonese ‘lo1’. Lingua, 122(14), 1739–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, G. & Hirschberg, J. (1985). Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language, 61, 747–76.Google Scholar

Warren, P. (2005a). Issues in the study of intonation in language varieties. Language and Speech, 48(4), 345‒58.Google Scholar

Warren, P. (2005b). Patterns of late rising in New Zealand English: Intonational variation or intonational change? Language Variation and Change, 17(2), 209‒30.Google Scholar

Warren, P. (2016). Uptalk: The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Warren, P. (2017). The interpretation of prosodic variability in the context of accompanying sociophonetic cues. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 11.Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. (2006). English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (1999). Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f₀ contours. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 55–105.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (2005). Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication, 46, 220–51.Google Scholar

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Abercrombie, D., Fry, D. B., McCarthy, P. A. D., Scott, N. C. & Trim, J. L. M., eds. (1964). In Honour of Daniel Jones: Papers Contributed on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday 12 September 1961. London: Longmans, Green & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar

Ball, M. J., Esling, J. H. & Dickson, B. C. (1995). The VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 25, 71–80.Google Scholar

Ball, M. J., Esling, J. H. & Dickson, B. C. (2000). The transcription of voice quality. In Kent & Ball, pp. 49–58.Google Scholar

Ball, M. J., Esling, J. H. & Dickson, B. C. (2018). Revisions to the VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 28, 165–71. doi:10.1017/S0025100317000159.Google Scholar

Benner, A. (2009). Production and Perception of Laryngeal Constriction in the Early Vocalizations of Bai and English Infants. Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria.Google Scholar

Benítez, A., Ramanarayanan, V., Goldstein, L. & Narayanan, S. S. (2014). A real-time MRI study of articulatory setting in second language speech. In Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Singapore, pp. 701–5.Google Scholar

Bruyninckx, M., Harmegnies, B., Llisterri, J. & Poch, D. (1994). Language-induced voice quality variability in bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 19–31.Google Scholar

Catford, J. C. (1964). Phonation types: The classification of some laryngeal components of speech production. In Abercrombie et al., pp. 26–37.Google Scholar

Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar